Embodiments of a method for detection of plurality of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in volumetric data are disclosed. In some embodiments, a three-dimensional matrix is developed by stacking of volumetric data and the bony structure is segmented through thresholding. Initially a seed point is searched for initializing the process of landmark detection. Two three-dimensional distance vectors are used to define and obtain the volume of Interest (voi). first 3-D distance vector helps to identify empirical point and consecutively second gives dimensions of the voi. Three-dimensional contours of anatomical structure are traced in the estimated voi. cephalometric landmarks are identified on the boundaries of traced anatomical geometry, based on corresponding mathematical entities. Detected landmark can be used as a reference point for further detection of landmarks. Estimating the voi and detection of points continues till all desired landmarks are detected. The detection procedure gives three-dimensional coordinate locations of the landmarks.
|
1. A computer-implemented method for fully automatic detection of a plurality of 3d cephalometric landmarks on anatomical structures in volumetric data comprising of prior knowledge derived from mathematical entities and steps, wherein the method comprises:
receiving three dimensional model data, wherein the three dimensional model data includes one or more of: computed tomography data (ct) produced by a ct scanner, cone beam computed tomography (cbct) data produced by a cbct scanner, or magnetic resonance imaging (mri) data produced by an mri scanner generating scan volumetric data of the skull of a patient;
detecting a reference point in a given volume in the three dimensional model data;
estimating an empirical point in the given volume based on a first vector distance from the reference point, wherein the empirical point comprises a point of maximum distance from the reference point;
estimating a voi (volume of Interest) in the given volume based on a second vector distance from the empirical point, wherein the voi comprises a subset of the given volume;
cropping the three dimensional model data for the voi;
detecting structural three-dimensional contours in the cropped voi using the mathematical entities applied individually on each 2D slice stacked as three dimensional model data;
detecting a landmark on one of the detected structural three-dimensional contours by performing a hierarchical search of a plurality of mathematical entities that includes:
identifying a first point based on a first mathematical entity from the reference point, wherein the identifying includes identifying a point on the one of the detected structural three-dimensional contours from the reference point in Y-axis direction as the first point;
identifying a second point based on a second mathematical entity from the first point, wherein the identifying includes identifying a point on the one of the detected structural three-dimensional contours from the first point in the Z-axis direction as the second point; and
identifying the landmark based on a third mathematical entity from the second point, wherein the identifying includes identifying a mid-point between the second point and a third point as the landmark; and
transmitting the landmark to a display for displaying the first point, the second point, and the detected landmark on the three dimensional model data to a user in order to facilitate 3-D cephalometric analysis of the anatomical structure, wherein the display is configured to display a plurality of two-dimensional slices of volumetric data stacked into a three-dimensional model and further display the first point, the second point, and the landmark within the three-dimensional model.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
6. The method of
7. The method of
8. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
11. The method of
12. The method of
13. The method of
14. The method of
15. The method of
detection of a peak point among a group of contour points;
detection of a deepest point among the group of contour points;
computing a mid-point of already detected two reference points;
detecting a point of inflection among corresponding contour points;
determining a point among the group of contour points with a minimum slope made with a reference point;
determining a point among the group of contour points with a maximum slope made with a reference point;
determining a centroid of a contour from the group of contour points;
determining a junction point of a plurality of contours;
determining a point among contour points which is nearest to the reference point; or
determining a point among contour points which is farthest to the reference point.
16. The method of
17. The method of
18. The method of
19. The method of
|
This application claims the benefit of the Indian Application No. 94/DEL/2015, which was filed on Jan. 13, 2015, and which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to the field of cephalometric analysis in orthodontics. More particularly, the disclosure relates to the method of automated cephalometric landmark detection on volumetric data, used by orthodontic specialists in cephalometric analysis for diagnosis and treatment planning of their patients.
Description of the Related Art
In dentistry, Orthodontic specialists use cephalometric analysis for diagnosis and treatment planning of patient's dento-maxillofacial and craniofacial deformity. In case of surgery, growth prediction or evaluation, monitoring treatment outcome cephalometric analysis is needed. It is based on geometrical measurements such as distances and angle. These measurements are recorded among standardly defined anatomical points called as landmarks. Calculated measurements of a patient are compared with standardly existing normal values according to the patient's race and ethnicity.
In the past, measurements, calculation and analysis were conducted manually by placing tracing sheets on the X-Ray film, which was error prone. Currently, computerized analysis is in clinical practice. Analysis is performed using plotted cephalometric landmarks on scanned/digital 2-D X-Ray films or 3-D CT/CBCT scan volumetric data of the skull. Plotting of landmarks takes time and efforts of an orthodontic specialist thus being tedious and time consuming. Also repeatability and reproducibility may be affected. Hence, computerized 2-D cephalometric analysis software is available for helping orthodontist. Analysis on three-dimensional frame is used to avoid the problems in two-dimensional radiographs. But, manual marking and plotting of landmarks on 3-D data is more difficult and exhausting with the appearance of third dimension. Thus, a method is proposed for searching landmarks automatically on 3-D volumetric data for assisting orthodontic surgeons.
The prior art uses marginal space learning geometrical model for localization of 3-D landmarks. It requires a training set for correct position and orientation. Hence, accuracy is not promising due to localization of points on the basis of distance learning based training. Another approach aligns patient image and training image of already localized points, using positional scaling and rotation. Then, correct position of a point is searched using similarity search for a feature. As the patient geometry is variable, results from similarity search are not promising. Another approach uses image adaptive transformation with already traced cephalometric image for anatomical landmark detection. This approach is similar as registration of two images.
At least some of the disclosed embodiments do not use any training set or registration procedure. In some embodiments, clustering of certain landmarks in a group and corresponding region is identified using Empirical Point calculated from a reference point. Corresponding Mathematical. Entity on detected contour gives the location of cephalometric landmark.
In contrast, prior art suffers from at least the following drawbacks.
This patent discloses converting sample image into patient image, by transforming anatomical structure of sample data into anatomical structure of patient data using morphing and image fusion algorithms. Similarly, cephalometric landmarks are identified on patient image by transformation of a sample image.
The transformation of sample image to a patient image is the drawback of this patent. By transformation of a standard image cannot promise for accurate results on the patient image.
This patent discloses detecting first landmark using Marginal Space Learning (MSL) and remaining landmarks based on geometrical model. Geometrical model is trained with manual cephalometric landmarks on various datasets.
The drawback of this system is that it has to calculate object position, position orientation and similarity transformation factors for transforming learned geometrical model to patient three-dimensional model. The estimation of these factors from trained model does not promise for accurate measure of cephalometric landmark position,
This patent discloses detecting anatomical landmarks in medical images and verifies its locations through spatial statistics.
The system is made for detecting anatomical landmarks using training database classifiers. The approach of the patent is generic for whole body anatomical landmarks. It comments neither for 2D or 3D landmarks nor for cephalometric landmarks in specific.
This patent discloses detecting anatomical landmarks in heart Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) using joint context. This method cannot be applied for cephalometric landmark detection.
This patent discloses detecting anatomical landmarks in brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and a combination of steps cannot be applied for cephalometric landmark detection.
This patent discloses detecting anatomical landmarks in brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and a combination of steps cannot be applied for cephalometric landmark detection.
This patent discloses detecting anterior and posterior commissure landmarks in brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and a combination of steps cannot be applied for cephalometric landmark detection.
This work proposed a method of automatic landmark detection based on the registration of test image over training image dataset. Registration is based on translation, rotation and scaling of training image and test image in all three axes. Translation is based on the center of gravity and principal axes of the 3D image,
The anatomy of each patient has a unique geometrical structure; therefore it cannot be overlapped properly over the anatomy of training data. Hence, the translation of landmarks from training to test image is error prone and promising results cannot be obtained.
This work explained a method of 3-D semi-automatic cephalometric landmark detection. A small region of points is detected manually which is a group of points where every point may be the landmark with a greater error. To find the most accurate point and identify it as a landmark from the group of points is performed automatically. It is difficult to identify the landmark accurately from the group of points manually. Hence, for increasing accuracy, one point is selected from the group of points by use of the definition of that particular landmark.
In the disclosed embodiments, these drawbacks have been removed and is based on the knowledge derived from the human anatomy. The anatomical definitions are transformed into mathematical entities for the detection of the landmarks which may be different or common for most of the landmarks. The knowledge is derived for each new landmark on the basis of its anatomical structure.
According to some embodiments, disclosed is a method of automatic landmark detection in three-dimensional data.
According to some embodiments, disclosed is a method of automatic landmark detection in three-dimensional data based on knowledge of human anatomy.
Yet according to some embodiments, disclosed is initialization of the detection of the landmark from a seed point which is a definite point to start search in anatomical geometry.
Still according to some embodiments, disclosed is reduction of search space in every step of the method so that every landmark can be defined in single mathematical entity.
Yet according to some embodiments, disclosed is searching landmark on patient data directly rather than sample image.
Still according to some embodiments, disclosed is providing a more accurate method for automatic cephalometric landmark detection.
Yet according to some embodiments, disclosed is providing a three-dimensional framework for diagnosis and treatment planning of patients.
In an embodiment, a method for detecting a plurality of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks automatically is disclosed. Said detection is based on Reference Point and two three-dimensional distance vectors calculated from the Reference Point. Selection of corresponding contour and Mathematical Entity are the steps for extracting 3-D coordinate of landmarks.
In another embodiment, a method for automatic detection of plurality of cephalometric anatomical landmarks in volumetric data is disclosed. Said method comprising steps of:
In yet another embodiment, said method includes a template comprising hard-tissues and teeth of lower mandible jaw for searching of seed point
In still another embodiment, said method includes searching of Reference seed Point in volumetric data.
In yet another embodiment, said method includes the estimation of Empirical Point using vector distance from Reference Point for detection of VOL
In still another embodiment, said method includes the estimation of VOI using vector distance from Empirical Point.
In yet another embodiment, said method includes the detection of contours by traversing of VOI through Sagittal, Coronal and Axial plane in the direction of X-axis, Y-axis and Z-axis respectively.
In still another embodiment, said method includes the detection of contours by traversing of VOI through the combination of Sagittal, Coronal and Axial plane in the direction of X-axis, Y-axis and Z-axis respectively.
In yet another embodiment, the method of contour identification is prominent point detection on a plane.
In still another embodiment, the method of contour identification is boundary point detection on a plane.
In yet another embodiment, said method includes detection of contour on projected XY-plane, projected YZ-plane and projected XZ-plane of 3-D VOI where coordinate of remaining dimension such as Z, X and Y can be zero respectively.
In still another embodiment, said method includes detection of 3-D landmark comprising of the detection of landmark on plane based on contour followed by detection of corresponding third coordinate.
In yet another embodiment, said method includes contour detection in plurality of VOI.
In still another embodiment, the plurality of three-dimensional points is detected automatically by traversing of volumetric data through Sagittal, Coronal and Axial plane.
In yet another embodiment, the detection of plurality of points by traversing of volumetric data through Sagittal, Coronal and Axial plane is the method of detection of cephalometric anatomical curve.
In still another embodiment, the plurality of three-dimensional points are detected automatically on detected contours of anatomical structure.
In yet another embodiment, the method includes detection of landmarks and reference points by using contour points on the basis of at least one of the following entities:
In still another embodiment, said method includes dividing the volumetric data in plurality of VOI for searching plurality of landmark.
In yet another embodiment, said method includes dividing the volumetric data in plurality of VOI for searching plurality of contour.
Table 1 illustrates required information for searching landmark automatically according to some embodiments.
TABLE 1
Distance to
Empirical
Region
Ref.
Point (mm ×
VOI size (mm ×
Corresponding
Mathematical
No.
Point
mm × mm)
mm × mm)
Contour(s)
Entity
Landmark(s)
Region-1
Seed
0 × 0 × 0
50 × 20 × 42
Contour made by
Deepest point in
B-Point
Point
the initial
Y-axis direction
boundary
Peak point in Y-
Pogonion
detection of
axis direction
geometrical
after location of
structure while
the B-point
traversing XZ-
Farthest point in
Menton
plane sequentially
negative Z-axis
from origin to Y-
direction
axis direction
Mid-Point of
Gnathion
Pogonion and
Menton on
contour
Region-2
Seed
−40 × 30 × 0
40 × 65 × 97
First geometrical
Deepest Point on
R3 (Right)
Point
contour by
contour
traversing XY-
Peak point in
Coronoid
plane in Z-axis
decreasing Y-axis
(Right)
direction from mid
direction
of the VOI
Peak point in
Condylion
increasing Y-axis
(Right)
direction
Based on R3 point
Projection point
R4 (Right)
of R3 on
geometry in
negative Z-axis
direction
First geometrical
Deepest Point on
R1 (Right)
contour by
contour
traversing XZ-
plane in negative
Y-axis direction
from mid of the
VOI
Based on R1 point
Projection point
R2 (Right)
of R1 on
geometry in
negative Y-axis
direction
Geometrical
A point from
Gonion
contour between
group of contour
(Right)
R2 and R4 point
points which has
minimum
distance on YZ-
Plane from
nearest vertex of
the same plane
Region-3
Seed
40 × 30 × 0
40 × 65 × 97
First geometrical
Deepest Point on
R3 (Left)
Point
contour by
contour
traversing XY-
Peak point in
Coronoid
plane in Z-axis
decreasing Y-axis
(Left)
direction from mid
direction
of the VOI
Peak point in
Condylion
increasing Y-axis
(Left)
direction
Based on R3 point
Projection point
R4 (Left)
of R3 on
geometry in
negative Z-axis
direction
First geometrical
Deepest Point on
R1 (Left)
contour by
contour
traversing XZ-
plane in negative
Y-axis direction
from mid of the
VOI
Based on R1 point
Projection point
R2 (Left)
of R1 on
geometry in
negative Y-axis
direction
Geometrical
A point from
Gonion (Left)
contour between
group of contour
R2 and R4 point
points which has
minimum
distance on YZ-
Plane from
nearest vertex of
the same plane
Region-4
Seed
0 × 0 × 50
50 × 65 × 40
Contour made by
Sharp peak point
ANS
Point
the initial
on contour in
boundary
negative Y-axis
detection of
direction
geometrical
Deepest point on
A-Point
structural points
contour after
while traversing
ANS in negative
XZ-plane
Z-axis direction
sequentially in Y-
axis direction
Contour made by
Peak point in Y-
PNS
the farthest point
axis direction
in Y-axis while
traversing YZ-
plane sequentially
in X-axis direction
Region-5
Seed
0 × 0 × 90
50 × 35 × 40
Contour made by
Deepest Point on
Nasion
Point
the initial
contour in Y-axis
boundary
direction
detection of
geometrical
structural points
while traversing
XZ-plane
sequentially in Y-
axis direction
Region-6
Nasion
−60 × 0 × −40
50 × 25 × 30
Contour made by
Deepest Point on
Orbitale
the initial
contour in
(Right)
boundary
negative Z-axis
detection of
direction
geometrical
structural points
while traversing
XY-plane
sequentially in Z-
axis direction
Region-7
Nasion
10 × 0 × −40
50 × 25 × 30
Contour made by
Deepest Point on
Orbitale (Left)
the initial
contour in
boundary
negative Z-axis
detection of
direction
geometrical
structural points
while traversing
XY-plane
sequentially in Z-
axis direction
Region-8
Nasion
−20 × 45 × −30
40 × 40 × 35
Contour made by
Midpoint of two
Sella
the anatomical
largest sequential
boundary in
gradients on YZ-
projected YZ-
plane contour (2-
plane (2-D) of
D) for y-and z-
VOI
axis coordinates;
and midsagittal
plane is referred
for corresponding
x-axis coordinate
Region-9
A-Point
−60 × 10 × −10
40 × 25 × 30
Contour made by
A point from
Jugal (right)
the anatomical
group of contour
boundary in
points which has
projected XZ-
maximum
plane (2-D) of
distance on XZ-
VOI
plane (for x- and
z-axis coordinate)
from the origin of
the VOI and
corresponding
midpoint of the
width of the Jugal
process of maxilla
is referred for x-
axis coordinate
Region-10
A-Point
20 × 10 × −10
40 × 25 30
Contour made by
A point from
Jugal (Left)
the anatomical
group of contour
boundary in
points which has
projected XZ-
maximum
plane (2-D) of
distance on XZ-
VOI
plane (for x- and
z-axis coordinate)
from the origin of
the VOI and
corresponding
midpoint of the
width of the Jugal
process of maxilla
is referred for x-
axis coordinate
A three-dimensional model can be visualized by stacking of two-dimensional slices of volumetric data. The examples of these data are Computed Tomography (CT), Cone Beam CT (CBCT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). These types of data are used in medical diagnosis and treatment planning. Data is uploaded in computer system and a computer program is run over the data and visualizes 2-D slices as well as 3-D anatomy which can be seen in any orientation. In clinical practice, orthodontists used to mark cephalometric landmarks on 3-D volume rendered model and 2-D slices, of volumetric data for cephalometric analysis of the patient. Cephalometric landmarks are the 3-D coordinates of established anatomical location in skull for establishing relationship with standard framework of measurements. Each landmark is plotted manually on either 3-D model or 2-D slices. It takes time and effort to search exact location of landmark.
According to an embodiment, a seed Point is searched in volumetric data. It is an initial Reference point to start searching for landmark detection. Seed point is dependent on distinct geometry in data. Thus, an approach of template matching is adopted for searching a distinguishable region in skull. A template with seed point is developed as shown in
Table 1 shows information for searching of cephalometric landmarks based on a seed Point according to some embodiments. Landmarks are searched in groups and each group is searched in a particular region. First region search is initialized from the seed point, and other regions are searched from either the seed point or the detected landmark. The seed point or detected landmark used for region searching is called as a Reference Point. For a particular region searching, two types of distance vectors are estimated. First distance vector is from Reference Point to Empirical Point, and second distance vector is from Empirical Point for VOI (Volume of Interest) size. Distance vector estimated from Reference Point to Empirical Point makes sure that there is no corresponding landmark belonging to the region existing in between. Distance covered with this vector gives coordinate of Empirical Point, Thus, the geometry between Reference Point and Empirical Point does not have landmark belonging to particular region which has to be found. Then again, distance vector is estimated from the Empirical Point which makes sure that the corresponding group of landmark exists in between. VOI is designed from Empirical Point of the size of estimated distance vector such that anatomical geometry of corresponding landmarks is accommodated, Contours are identified on the detected anatomical geometry of the VOL Corresponding Mathematical Entity is applied to the relevant contour to detect coordinates of landmark as shown in Table 1.
Thus, Table 1 provides VOI, Reference Point, distance vector for Empirical Point estimation, VOI size, corresponding contour and Mathematical Entity for particular landmark search. This information can be used for certain landmark searching. However, the scope of this disclosure is not limited to this information. For example, such type of information can be generated for further landmark detection.
Present embodiment is composed of certain steps which are performed on patient's volumetric data.
Three-dimensional matrix is simply thresholded hard-tissue data of skull. It does not have a point of reference for understanding the anatomical geometry. Thus, a template is made for searching a seed point in unknown anatomical geometry for initializing the process of searching. This point is referred to as a seed Point. It may exist anywhere in volumetric data. This is an initializing point of the search process as a Reference Point. At step 208, a seed point is searched in segmented data of stage 206. Seed point is a known anatomical geometrical point from where Empirical Point is estimated. Some embodiments use template matching method for searching of seed point. A template comprising lower mandible region is used for searching a seed point in volumetric data as shown in
At step 210, Empirical Point is found using distance vector from the reference of seed point. This is the maximum distance from Reference Point which does not contain belonging landmark of the particular region. At step 212, again a distance vector is estimated from the empirical point for accommodating a desired group of landmarks. This distance vector develops a Volume of Interest (VOI), VOI is sufficient in size that corresponding group of landmarks exists in it.
At step 214, vector distance is cropped and obtains a volume of interest (VOI). At step 216, three-dimensional contours are detected by tracing anatomical structure of VOI. Contours are detected by traversing of VOI either one or in combination of Sagittal, Coronal and Axial plane in the direction of X-axis, Y-axis and Z-axis respectively. Prominent point detection on a plane and boundary point detection on a plane are other methods for detecting contours in VOI. It is not necessary to trace all contours of the VOL For reducing complexity of the method, only required contours can be traced where desired landmark resides.
Returning to
a) Searching peak point; b) Searching deepest point; c) Calculating a mid-point of reference points; d), Searching a point of inflection among corresponding contour Points; e) Determining a point with minimum slope made with a reference point; f) Determining a point with maximum slope made with a reference point; g) Determining a centroid of contour; h) Determining a junction point of plurality of contours; i) Determining a point among contour points which is nearest to the reference point; j) Determining a point among contour points which is farthest to the reference point.
At step 220, coordinates of the desired cephalometric landmarks are obtained using the Mathematical Entity in stage 218, Obtained landmarks are stored in program variable and can be used as a reference point for further detection of landmarks. Detected landmarks can be used as a Reference Point for input of stage 210 for further detection of landmarks in next iteration. Similarly, the same process as described earlier is processed for further detection of remaining landmarks. This process is in a loop till all the desired landmarks are detected. A Reference Point can also be used to make plurality of VOIs at different times. Additionally plurality of Reference Points can be used to define one VOI.
The above described method is run with the computer program. Patient data is stored in computer memory or external memory attached to the computer system. At stage 222, coordinates for all desired detected landmarks are obtained through the computer program. These coordinates of landmarks can be input into any other software or computer program, and visualized the landmark on patient's data. This process can be helpful for assisting orthodontist for cephalometric analysis. Time for landmark plotting and corresponding efforts can be reduced for the same.
Some embodiments relate to the process of landmark detection for cephalometric analysis. While these and other embodiments have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the protection. Indeed, the novel methods and systems described herein may be embodied in a variety of other forms. Furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes in the form of the methods and systems described herein may be made without departing from the spirit of the protection. The accompanying claims and their equivalents are intended to cover such forms or modifications as would fall within the scope and spirit of the protection. For example, embodiments of the automatic landmark detection method can be used in other volumetric data also for detecting landmarks. Various processes and/or components illustrated in the figures may be implemented as software and/or firmware on a processor, ASIC/FPGA, or dedicated hardware, which can include logic circuitry. The software and/or firmware can be stored on a non-transitory computer readable storage, such as for example in internal or external memory. Additional system components can be utilized, and disclosed system components can be combined or omitted. The actual steps taken in the disclosed processes, such as the process illustrated in
The following examples are for illustration purposes only and do not cover or reflect the full scope of present disclosure, which is defined by the claims.
A three-dimensional matrix is developed with sectional slices of CBCT data. This matrix contains HU values of geometrical anatomy of skull. Bony structure of the skull is segmented using thresholding HU value as 226. A seed point is searched using template searching method with correlation measurement. It is identified towards origin of the best searched region and anatomically available below chin. This seed point is considered as reference point for initializing the searching of landmarks. Empirical point is found at 0×0×0 distance from the reference point. A volume of interest (VOI) of size 50 mm×20 mm×42 mm is picked out from empirical point. This is the first region for detection of B-Point, Menton, Pogonion, Gnathion landmarks. A contour is made in VOI by the detection of initial boundary of geometrical structure while traversing XZ-plane sequentially from origin in Y-axis direction. Corresponding mathematical entity is selected for obtaining the coordinates of particular landmark. Deepest point in the Y-axis direction is identified as B-point. Peak point in Y-axis direction after location of the B-point is identified as Pogonion point. Farthest point in negative Z-axis direction is identified as the Menton point, Mid-point of Pogonion and Menton on contour is identified as Gnathion.
Empirical point is identified at −40 mm×30 mm×0 distance vector from the seed reference point and VOI is designed a size of 40 mm×65 mm×97 mm. First geometrical contour is selected by traversing XY-plane in Z-axis direction from mid of the VOI. The deepest point on the contour is identified as right R3 point, peak point in decreasing Y-axis direction is identified as right Coronoid point and peak point in increasing Y-axis direction is identified as right Condylion point. Projection point of R3 on geometry in negative Z-axis direction is identified as right R4 point. First geometrical contour is selected by traversing XZ-plane in the negative Y-axis direction from mid of the VOI. The deepest point on contour is identified as right R1 point and projection point of R1 on geometry in negative Y-direction is identified as right R2 point. Geometrical contour between R2 and R4 point is selected and a point is detected from group of contour points which has minimum distance on YZ-Plane from nearest vertex of the same plane is known as right Gonion point.
Empirical point is identified at 0×0×50 mm from the seed point and VOI is designed of size 50 mm×65 mm×40 mm. First contour is made by the initial boundary detection of geometrical structural points while traversing XZ-plane sequentially in Y-axis direction. A sharp peak point on contour in negative Y-axis direction is identified as ANS point and deepest point on contour after ANS in negative Z-direction is identified as A-point. A contour is made by selecting the farthest point in Y-axis while traversing YZ-plane sequentially in X-axis direction. PNS point is identified as a peak point in Y-axis direction on this contour.
Empirical point is identified at 0×0×90 mm vector distance from the seed point and designed a VOI of size 50 mm×35 mm×40 mm. A contour is made by the initial boundary detection of geometrical structural points while traversing XZ-plane sequentially in Y-axis direction. The deepest point on the contour in Y-axis direction is identified as Nasion point.
One advantage is that it uses a seed point to initialize the search process which is a definite and unique point for identification of anatomical geometry.
Another advantage is that it proposes the hierarchical search method which reduces the search space in each stage.
Another advantage is that it is based on the knowledge generated from human anatomy.
Another advantage is that it searches the landmark by traversing each slice which is the smallest transaction unit.
Another advantage is that it provides assistance for 3-D cephalometric analysis for orthodontists.
Another advantage is that it saves time for 3-D cephalometric analysis.
Gupta, Abhishek, Sardana, Harish Kumar, Kharbanda, Om Prakash, Sardana, Viren
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5760778, | Aug 15 1995 | Algorithm for representation of objects to enable robotic recongnition | |
6078688, | Aug 23 1996 | NEC Corporation | Method for image segmentation by minimizing the ratio between the exterior boundary cost and the cost of the enclosed region |
6674883, | Aug 14 2000 | Siemens Corporation | System and method for the detection of anatomic landmarks for total hip replacement |
7783090, | Nov 19 2003 | Agency for Science, Technology and Research | Automatic identification of the anterior and posterior commissure landmarks |
8023706, | Dec 07 2006 | Brainlab AG | Automatically determining landmarks on anatomical structures |
8116544, | Apr 03 2008 | FUJIFILM Corporation | Apparatus, method, and program for detecting three dimensional abdominal cavity regions |
8126240, | Feb 16 2005 | BIOCLINICA, INC | Vertebral fracture quantification |
8150498, | Sep 08 2006 | Medtronic, Inc | System for identification of anatomical landmarks |
8160322, | Aug 02 2007 | Siemens Healthcare GmbH | Joint detection and localization of multiple anatomical landmarks through learning |
8160323, | Sep 06 2007 | Siemens Healthcare GmbH | Learning a coarse-to-fine matching pursuit for fast point search in images or volumetric data using multi-class classification |
8160677, | Sep 08 2006 | Medtronic, Inc | Method for identification of anatomical landmarks |
8218849, | Sep 04 2008 | SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG | Method and system for automatic landmark detection using discriminative joint context |
8363918, | Nov 12 2008 | SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG | Method and system for anatomic landmark detection using constrained marginal space learning and geometric inference |
9078621, | Nov 09 2012 | SCOTT & WHITE HEALTHCARE | Method and system of measuring anatomical features in subcutaneous images to assess risk of injury |
9084629, | Oct 02 2012 | Image guided atlas correction | |
9153022, | Sep 16 2010 | MOR RESEARCH APPLICATIONS LTD | Method and system for analyzing craniofacial complex images |
9218542, | Aug 09 2013 | SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG | Localization of anatomical structures using learning-based regression and efficient searching or deformation strategy |
9480439, | Nov 01 2012 | Virginia Commonwealth University | Segmentation and fracture detection in CT images |
9554868, | Aug 07 2009 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Method and apparatus for reducing malalignment of fractured bone fragments |
20160063720, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 12 2016 | Council of Scientific and Industrial Research | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jan 12 2016 | National Informatics Centre Department of Electronics and Information Technology | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Apr 03 2019 | GUPTA, ABHISHEK | Council of Scientific and Industrial Research | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 048974 | /0440 | |
Apr 03 2019 | KHARBANDA, OM PRAKASH | NATIONAL INFORMATICS CENTRE-DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 048974 | /0440 | |
Apr 03 2019 | KHARBANDA, OM PRAKASH | Council of Scientific and Industrial Research | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 048974 | /0440 | |
Apr 03 2019 | GUPTA, ABHISHEK | NATIONAL INFORMATICS CENTRE-DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 048974 | /0440 | |
Apr 09 2019 | SARDANA, VIREN | Council of Scientific and Industrial Research | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 048974 | /0440 | |
Apr 09 2019 | SARDANA, VIREN | NATIONAL INFORMATICS CENTRE-DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 048974 | /0440 | |
Apr 18 2019 | SARDANA, HARISH KUMAR | NATIONAL INFORMATICS CENTRE-DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 048974 | /0440 | |
Apr 18 2019 | SARDANA, HARISH KUMAR | Council of Scientific and Industrial Research | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 048974 | /0440 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 30 2023 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jul 17 2023 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jun 11 2022 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Dec 11 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 11 2023 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jun 11 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jun 11 2026 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Dec 11 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 11 2027 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jun 11 2029 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jun 11 2030 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Dec 11 2030 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 11 2031 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jun 11 2033 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |