A hybrid digital electronic tuner (HDET) uses a modified forward signal power injection technique, a variance of a prior art Gamma Boosting Unit (GBU) technique, cascaded with a digital, PIN diode based, electronic tuner, all integrated in the same low loss parallel plate airline (slabline) to create a compact hybrid tuner unit able of generating thousands of high reflection factors (|Gamma|≥1) at millisecond tuning speed.
|
1. A hybrid digital electronic impedance tuner (HDET) comprising two modules,
a) an active tuner module, and
b) a passive tuner module,
wherein
the active module comprises two ports, an input (test) port and an output (idle) port, and
a slotted airline (slabline) between the ports, two directional signal couplers (wave-probes) and an amplifier;
wherein
the slabline comprises metallic, grounded sidewalls, a center conductor between the ports and the two wave-probes, of which one is fixed and one is mobile,
and wherein
each wave-probe comprises a coupled port and an isolated port,
and wherein
the mobile wave-probe is attached on an adjustable vertical axis of a mobile carriage, said the vertical axis controlling the penetration of the mobile wave-probe into the slot of the slabline,
and wherein
the carriage slides across the length of the slabline;
and wherein
the passive tuner module comprises a multitude of rf electronic switches (PIN diodes), and is incorporated in the section of the slabline between the active module and the output port.
2. The tuner of
3. The tuner of
5. The tuner of
wherein
the isolated ports of both wave-probes are terminated with characteristic impedance.
6. The tuner of
7. The tuner of
8. A calibration method for the tuner of
a) the tuner is connected to a pre-calibrated vector network analyzer (VNA);
b) the mobile wave-probe is withdrawn, all electronic switches are set to OFF (open circuit) and s-parameters of the tuner are measured and saved in a matrix [S0];
c) the mobile wave-probe is gradually inserted into the slabline and the carriage moved horizontally creating a multitude of active module states and the s-parameters of the tuner are measured and saved;
d) the mobile wave-probe is withdrawn and s-parameters of the tuner for all permutations of electronic switches between ON and OFF states are measured and saved;
e) the s-parameters of step d) are de-embedded (cascaded with the inverse matrix [S0]−1);
f) the s-parameters of steps c) and e) are cascaded in computer memory and saved in calibration file for later use.
|
This application claims priority on provisional application 62/443,168, titled: Active Digital Electronic Tuner, filed on Jan. 6, 2017.
This invention relates to high power (nonlinear) testing of microwave transistors (DUT). When the transistors are driven in their nonlinear operation regime their internal output impedance is very low. An impedance tuner used to match the transistor must also conjugate-match this impedance, i.e. the reflection factor presented by the tuner to the DUT must have the same amplitude and the opposite phase: Γtuner=Γ*DUT. Passive impedance tuners can reach maximum reflection factors |Γtuner| of the order of 0.95, corresponding (in a 50Ω system) to impedances of 2.4Ω. The insertion loss, created by RF cables, test fixtures etc. between the DUT and the tuner reduces the available tuning range at the DUT reference plane and thus the capacity of the passive tuner to match the transistor. The only unconditional remedy to this limitation is using active systems, i.e. test systems whereby a signal, coherent with the signal which is injected into the input and exits from output of the DUT, is reverse-injected simultaneously into the output of the DUT, coming from the load, and creates a “virtual” load. This additional signal can be the only one injected, in which case we speak of purely “active” load pull, or it can be superimposed to signal reflected by a passive tuner, in which case we speak of “hybrid” load pull; obviously, if only a (mechanical or electronic) tuner is present, we speak of “passive” load pull. In both active injection cases (pure active and hybrid) the objective is to reach and conjugate match the internal impedance of the transistor; in general terms a standard requirement is a dynamic tuning range reaching a reflection factor |Γ|=1 at the DUT reference plane (corresponding to an internal DUT impedance close to 0Ω); because of the above mentioned insertion losses between DUT and tuner, however, it is necessary that, at the tuner reference plane the generated reflection factor Γtuner be |Γtuner|>1. The objective of this invention is a hybrid (active plus passive) tuner apparatus, combining a forward signal injection mechanism with a passive electronic tuner, allowing |Γ|≥1. It must be clarified at this point that “electronic” does not mean “active”. Electronic tuners, as disclosed here, are passive, but not electro-mechanical.
Passive automatic (remotely controlled) tuners are either electromechanical (see ref. 5) or electronic (see ref. 6). Electromechanical tuners cover high frequency bandwidth (are wideband), generate high reflection factor (Gamma), are linear, have high tuning resolution, but they are slow, because of the mechanical movement. Electronic tuners use PIN diodes (see ref. 7), and have smaller bandwidth, lower maximum reflection factor Gamma, lower linearity and resolution than mechanical tuners, but they are extremely fast (they switch states in milli-seconds versus seconds of mechanical tuners); so in essence we are talking about an increased speed ratio (or reduced tuning time) of 1000:1. For a number of applications electronic tuners, if enhanced with active modules, as in this invention, can reach maximum reflection factor |Gamma|≥1 and can exploit their high tuning speed. And as modern test technologies evolve into automatic testing a large number of on-wafer chips, speed is of essence and may overcome other, above mentioned, comparative weaknesses of electronic tuners.
There have been several attempts at active load pull systems, starting back in the 70'ies (see ref. 1 and 2). Such load pull techniques use the so called “virtual load” method. The virtual load method consists in injecting into the output of the DUT RF coherent signal power at the same frequency as traversing the DUT from the input to the output, but with statically controlled phase and amplitude. Knowing that the reflection factor “seen” by the DUT is equal to the ratio of returned (reflected) power wave <a> to primary output power wave <b>: (Γ=<a>/<b>,
The concept used in this invention to create the active part of the load is the forward injection technique, also called Gamma Boosting Unit (GBU),
The invention and its mode of operation will be more clearly understood from the following detailed description when read with the appended drawings in which:
The concept of the Hybrid Digital Electronic Tuner (HDET) is shown in
In
The active module unit comprises two wave probes 707 and 77. One wave-probe, 77, is attached to a fixed support 76 and is adjusted to provide a fixed coupling factor S31 at any given frequency (
The tuning mechanism is shown in
The signal flow inside the active digital electronic tuner is represented, schematically, in
Depending on the actual value of C1, C2, G and Γtuner the magnitude of |Γload| can be equal or larger than 1. The need to reach values >1 is dictated by the fact that connections between the DUT and the tuner introduce insertion loss, which reduces the reflection factor at the DUT reference plane and must be compensated. Considering that all above coefficients are complex, having a real and imaginary part and backwards travelling waves are re-reflected forward, creating multiple reflections, it becomes obvious that such a situation cannot be handled analytically with a simple equation as above. It can only be processed with actually measured calibration data numerically, in which case only the net values of the various signal vectors, including the relative amplitudes and phases, as they arrive at the test port, after being coupled, amplified, injected and reflected, are taken into account.
The tuner must be calibrated before being used. This is done, at a user defined frequency, in linear operation of the amplifier (and assuming that the amplifier does not become non-linear in actual operation) using a test setup which comprises (i) a pre-calibrated vector network analyzer (VNA), (ii) the tuner and (iii) a control computer connected operationally with the VNA. The tuner is connected with the test ports of the VNA using flexible RF cables. The VNA measures the four scattering parameters (s-parameters) S11, S12, S21 and S22, of the tuner for a multitude of horizontal and vertical positions of the wave-probes and the setting permutations of the diodes at selected frequencies. The wave-probe 1 positions are selected such that the created reflection factors cover a full circle area of the Smith chart (
Obvious alternative embodiments are imaginable but shall not impede on the originality of the idea of using slabline based phase and amplitude adjustable signal coupling structure to create a hybrid (active-passive) electronic load pull tuner.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10520541, | Oct 21 2016 | TSIRONIS, CHRISTOS | Hybrid electronic tuner |
10725094, | Oct 05 2017 | TSIRONIS, CHRISTOS | Active electronic tuner |
11863163, | Apr 02 2020 | Digital hybrid load pull system |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5034708, | May 16 1989 | Automatic Testing and Networking, Inc. | Programmable broadband electronic tuner |
7282926, | Jun 05 2006 | Keysight Technologies, Inc | Method and an apparatus for characterizing a high-frequency device-under-test in a large signal impedance tuning environment |
9331670, | Aug 07 2013 | TSIRONIS, CHRISTOS | Gamma boosting unit (GBU) for hybrid load and source pull |
9660607, | May 31 2013 | Maury Microwave, Inc. | Solid state impedance tuners |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 05 2018 | TSIRONIS, CHRISTOS | FOCUSMW IP INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 044541 | /0275 | |
Feb 27 2019 | FOCUSMW IP INC | TSIRONIS, CHRISTOS | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 048449 | /0245 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 05 2018 | BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code). |
Jan 29 2018 | SMAL: Entity status set to Small. |
Feb 27 2023 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Aug 14 2023 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jul 09 2022 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jan 09 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 09 2023 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jul 09 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jul 09 2026 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jan 09 2027 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 09 2027 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jul 09 2029 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jul 09 2030 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jan 09 2031 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 09 2031 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jul 09 2033 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |