screens for conical mills and an improved gearbox and housing for such conical mills are shown and described. The screens are frusto-conically-shaped and include a tapered sidewall with a plurality of openings in the sidewall that may be of uniform size. Each opening is separated from adjacent openings by spacing distances which are shorter at the top of the tapered sidewall and longer at the bottom of the tapered sidewall to thereby reduce the residence time of the powder being milled at the top of the tapered sidewall and to increase the residence time of the powder being milled at the bottom of the tapered sidewall.
|
6. A screen for a mill, the screen comprising: a tapered sidewall having a wider top and a narrower bottom, the sidewall including a plurality of openings of a uniform size, the plurality of openings disposed in a plurality of rows arranged insets of rows from the top to the bottom, wherein each set of rows comprises one or more rows; each opening separated from adjacent openings by spacing distances, the spacing distances between each opening in a row being substantially equidistant to each other, the spacing distances at the top of the sidewall being less than the spacing distances at the bottom of the sidewall, wherein the spacing distances of adjacent openings of one set of rows is less than the spacing distances of adjacent openings of a successive set of rows, the successive set of rows being towards the bottom; wherein the sidewall includes a total surface area interrupted by the openings that cumulatively provide an open area percentage, and wherein the open area percentage is about 40% at the top of the sidewall, the open area percentage is about 25% at the bottom of the sidewall, and the openings disposed between the top and the bottom of the sidewall provide an open area percentage ranging from less than 40% to greater than 25%; wherein the screen is configured to receive an impeller, the impeller configured to rotate within the screen at a rotational speed; and wherein the open area percentages of the top and the bottom of the sidewall compensate for the rotational speed of the impeller to promote an even particle size distribution of a material passing through the openings of the tapered sidewall, wherein lower rotational speeds of the impeller near the bottom of the sidewall are compensated for with a lower open area percentage, and higher rotational speeds of the impeller near the top of the sidewall are compensated for with a higher open area percentage.
1. A screen for a mill, the screen comprising: a tapered sidewall having a wider top and a narrower bottom, the sidewall including a plurality of openings of a uniform size, the plurality of openings disposed in a plurality of rows arranged in sets of rows from the top to the bottom, wherein each set of rows comprises one or more rows; each opening separated from adjacent openings by spacing distances, the spacing distances between each opening in a row being substantially equidistant to each other, the spacing distances at the top of the sidewall being less than the spacing distances at the bottom of the sidewall, wherein the spacing distances of adjacent openings of one set of rows is less than the spacing distances of adjacent openings of a successive set of rows, the successive set of rows being towards the bottom; wherein the sidewall further includes a total surface area interrupted by the openings, the sidewall also comprising an upper section, an upper middle section, a lower middle section, and a lower section, the openings in the upper section provide an open area percentage ranging from about 30% to about 50% of the total surface area of the sidewall in the upper section, the openings in the upper middle section provide an open area percentage ranging from about 25% to about 45% of the total surface area of the sidewall in the upper middle section, the openings in the lower middle section provide an open area percentage ranging from about 20% to about 40% of the total surface area of the sidewall in the lower middle section, the openings in the lower section provide an open area percentage ranging from about 15% to about 35% of the total surface area of the sidewall in the lower section; wherein the screen is configured to receive an impeller, the impeller configured to rotate within the screen at a rotational speed; and wherein the open area percentages of the upper section, upper middle section, lower middle section, and lower section compensate for the rotational speed of the impeller to promote an even particle size distribution of a material passing through the openings of the tapered sidewall, wherein lower rotational speeds of the impeller near the bottom of the sidewall are compensated for with a lower open area percentage, and higher rotational speeds of the impeller near the top of the sidewall are compensated for with a higher open area percentage.
3. The screen of
4. The screen of
5. The screen of
|
This application is a national phase application of and claims priority to International Application No. PCT/162016/001130 filed Jul. 12, 2016, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/208,281 filed Aug. 21, 2015, which are hereby all incorporated herein by reference.
This disclosure relates to conical mills used to reduce the particle size of granular materials. More specifically, this disclosure relates to the conical screens used in such conical mills, which include a hole pattern that varies from the top to the bottom of the sidewall for narrower particle size distributions, reduced heat generation and increased capacity. The disclosed conical mills may be cleaned without disassembly and the disclosed conical mills feature lubricant-free gearboxes, which reduce the risk of product contamination.
Conical mills are widely used in the production of powders used in pharmaceuticals, food and cosmetics. Powders are typically manufactured as solid or granular materials before being size-reduced into the desired final powder particle size distribution or form. For example, the manufacture of pharmaceutical tablets requires milling (or size-reduction) of the granular material to a milled powder that can easily flow and be pressed into a tablet.
Conical mills of the prior art include an impeller or rotor disposed within a conical or frusto-conically-shaped classifying screen located between an input and an output, all of which is disposed within a milling chamber. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,759,507, 5,282,579, 5,330,113 and 5,607,062, all commonly assigned to Quadro Engineering. These conical mills employ various screen and impeller combinations to reduce the particle size of the incoming granular material. The choice of the screen and impeller combination depends on the desired particle size distribution (PSD) and the type of granular product being processed. While the openings of each screen are of a uniform size and shape, various screens are available with openings of different sizes and shapes that help determine the PSD of the milled powder product.
Prior art screens used by various milling technologies have the same size openings (holes) and open area percentage throughout the entire surface of the screen, as they are made from blanks by punching, chemically etching or laser cutting the openings. For conical mills, these screens have about a 60-degree profile (larger diameter at the top, tapering down towards the bottom), with the impeller matching the profile of the screen. When the impeller rotates, the velocity of the impeller arms is higher near the wider top of the screen than at the narrower bottom of the screen. As a result, the energy imparted to the solid product or powder is not consistent from the top to the bottom of the screen. Due to the varying speeds of the impeller arms, uneven milling forces are applied to the solid product, resulting in a wider PSD range because powder near the top of the sidewall experience more energy in the form of faster arm speeds and therefore is more size-reduced than the powder near the bottom of the sidewall.
From a mechanical process perspective (assuming the formulation is stable), the strength and durability of a tablet pressed from milled powder is highly dependent on the PSD, the bulk density and the flowability of the milled powder. Excessive amounts of particles falling above or below the target PSD can cause tableting defects and are sometimes removed or discarded, resulting in waste. Further, the disposal of at least some pharmaceutical products requires special handling due to environmental regulations that increase the cost of the product or the loss associated with the production of particles that fall outside of the target PSD. Hence, conical mills that can provide narrow PSDs of powders with less waste are in demand.
Because pharmaceutical, food and cosmetic industries have very strict sanitary standards for operation and production, conical mills must be capable of full sanitization. Further, because the production of powders may create an inhalation hazard, and a particularly acute hazard when it comes to some pharmaceutical compounds, the milling chamber must provide adequate containment of the milled powder and any dust created by the milling process. Because of the potentially hazardous nature of some powders, the pharmaceutical industry is trending toward equipment that does not require manual cleaning, but rather equipment that can be cleaned automatically without operator exposure to the milled powder or dust, and without the need to move the equipment, which is also characterized as “clean-in-place” or CIP designs. Therefore, any improved conical mill should also be a CIP design.
Finally, conical mills can generate substantial noise during operation, which requires operators to wear ear protection. With a manufacturer operating several or dozens of conical mills in one area of facility, noise generation from conical mills can be problematic. Hence, improved conical mills that generate less noise are in demand.
In order to meet the demands of the pharmaceutical, food, chemical and cosmetics industries, this application discloses improved conical mills with one or more improvements in the form of redesigned screens, impellers, housings and/or gearboxes. The disclosed screens and/or the disclosed screens in combination with the disclosed impellers provide narrower PSDs, reduced heat generation and improved throughput. The disclosed housings and gearboxes of the disclosed conical mills eliminate or substantially reduce sound generation, the possibility of product contamination from the gearbox and the disclosed conical mills may be cleaned in place (CIP design).
Disclosed herein are new “progressive open area percentage” screens that counter the uneven impeller forces from top to bottom, by varying the percentage of open area of the screens from top to bottom (or by varying the spacing distances between the openings). By changing the open area percentage, the slower impeller speeds near the bottom of the sidewall are compensated for with a lower open area percentage and longer spacings between openings, thereby giving the powder at the bottom of the screen exposure to more impeller rotations (i.e., longer residence times) before it passes through the openings. Further, the top or upper portion of the screen has more openings or a greater open area percentage because the higher rotational speed of the impeller at the top of the screen requires less exposure of the powder to the impeller and, hence, the need for a higher open area percentage and shorter spacings between openings. As a result, milling forces seen by the powders inside the milling chamber are evenly distributed across the entire height or length of the screen, resulting in more particles having similar sizes once milled and therefore narrower PSDs. The redesigned screen opening (hole) patterns increase the open area percentage near the top of the sidewall by up to 50% over traditional conical screens, thereby reducing the residence time inside the milling chamber, reducing heat generation and improving capacity.
In addition, to address the clean-in-place (CIP) requirement, the disclosed conical mills incorporate an impeller with a captured O-ring configuration and redesigned impeller cross arms ensuring full cleaning coverage of all powder-contact surfaces without the need to open the equipment to clean manually. Furthermore, complete containment of powders and cleaning solution is achieved inside the milling chamber via two O-rings, located above and below the screen's contact points with the feed chute and the housing. This ensures that powders during milling are only present in the internal contact surface areas and cleaning solutions cannot escape or be trapped in crevices after a cleaning cycle.
The disclosed conical mill employs non-metallic gears inside the gearbox, eliminating the need to use grease to lubricate. The gearbox is isolated from the product contact zone with the use of seals. These seals make positive contact with the rotating shaft to ensure that no product can penetrate the gearbox and no grease/lubricant can escape the gearbox and contaminate the powders being milled. To avoid the use of grease or lubricant in the gearbox altogether, the gearbox may employ non-metallic composite gears.
The gearbox disclosed herein may house high strength composite material gears, which can be operated reliably and consistently without the need to add any lubrication or grease. Therefore, even if a shaft seal is inadvertently compromised, the product will not be contaminated from the gearbox. In the pharmaceutical and food industries where a large percentage of these machines are sold, eliminating this potential source of contamination is deemed critical. In contrast, prior art gearboxes currently used for size-reduction apparatuses employ steel, stainless steel or bronzed gears—with FDA approved lubricant. Nevertheless, should this lubricant contaminate a batch of product, the batch will need to be discarded
In one aspect, a screen for a mill includes a tapered sidewall having a wider top and a narrower bottom. The sidewall includes a plurality of openings that may be of a uniform size. Each opening is separated from adjacent openings by spacing distances. The spacing distances at the top of the sidewall being shorter than the spacing distances at the bottom of the sidewall. As a result, the open area percentage at the top of the sidewall is greater than the open area percentage at the bottom of the sidewall.
In any one or more of the embodiments described above, a mill includes a housing that accommodates a frusto-conically shaped screen that includes a tapered sidewall having a wider top and a narrower bottom. The sidewall includes a plurality of openings of a uniform size. Each opening is separated from adjacent openings by a spacing distance. The spacing distances at the top of the sidewall being shorter than the spacing distances at the bottom of the sidewall (and, consequently, the open area percentage at the top of the sidewall is greater than the open area percentage at the bottom of the sidewall). The sidewall accommodates an impeller mounted coaxially within the sidewall of the screen. The impeller includes a lower base disposed at the bottom of the sidewall of the screen and the lower base may be connected to an output shaft that extends through the bottom of the sidewall of the screen. The base connects to at least one milling member that extends from the top to the bottom and along the sidewall. The output shaft of the impeller connects to an output gear. The output gear meshes with an input gear. The input gear may connect to an input shaft, which may connect to a motor. In an embodiment, non-metallic composite materials may be used to fabricate the input gears.
In yet another aspect, a method for size-reducing a flowable solid material may include providing a mill that includes a housing that accommodates a screen between a top and a bottom of the housing. The screen includes a frusto-conically shaped sidewall having a wider top and a narrower bottom. The sidewall screen includes a plurality of openings of a uniform size. However, each opening is separated from adjacent openings by spacing distances. The spacing distances between openings at the top of the sidewall of the screen are shorter than the spacing distances between the openings at the bottom of the sidewall of the screen (and, consequently, the open are percentage at the top of the screen exceeds the open area percentage at the bottom of the screen). Further, the sidewall accommodates an impeller mounted coaxially within the sidewall. The impeller comprises at least one milling member that extends parallel to the sidewall from the top to the bottom of the sidewall. The method further includes rotating the impeller, delivering flowable solid material through the top of the housing and through the top of the sidewall of the screen, pressing the flowable solid material through the openings in the sidewall of the screen with the rotating impeller to produce size-reduced material, and collecting the size-reduced material.
In any one or more of the embodiments described above, an open area percentage provided by the openings in the sidewall of the screen is greater at the top of the sidewall of the screen than at the bottom of the sidewall of the screen.
In any one or more of the embodiments described above, the sidewall of the screen is frusto-conically shaped.
In any one or more of the embodiments described above, the openings in the sidewall of the screen have a shape selected from the group consisting of round, square and rectangular.
In any one or more of the embodiments described above, the sidewall, at each opening, includes an inwardly extending dimple or rasp.
In any one or more of the embodiments described above, the sidewall of the screen includes a total surface area interrupted by the openings. The sidewall also includes an upper section, an upper middle section, a lower middle section and a lower section. The openings in the upper section provide an open area percentage ranging from about 30% to about 50% of the total surface area of the sidewall in the upper section, the openings in the upper middle section provide an open area percentage ranging from about 25% to about 45% of the total surface area of the sidewall in the upper middle section, the openings in the lower middle section provide an open area percentage ranging from about 20% to about 40% of the total surface area of the sidewall in the lower middle section and the openings in the lower section provide an open area percentage ranging from about 15% to about 35% of the total surface area of the sidewall in the lower section.
In any one or more of the embodiments described above, the sidewall of the screen includes a total surface area interrupted by the openings that accumulatively provide an open area percentage. The open area percentage may range from about 30% to about 50% at the top of the sidewall while the open area percentage may range from about 15% to about 35% at the bottom of the sidewall and the openings disposed between the top and bottom of the sidewall may provide an open area percentage ranging from less than about 40% to greater than about 25%.
In any one or more of the embodiments described above, at least part of the output shaft, the output shaft and at least part of the input shaft are disposed within a gearbox. The gearbox is sealably connected to the housing. Further, the gearbox contains no lubricant.
In any one or more of the embodiments described above, the impeller includes a lower base disposed at the bottom of the sidewall of the screen, which connects to an output shaft that extends through the bottom of the sidewall of the screen. The base connects to at least one milling member that extends from the top to the bottom of the sidewall of the screen. The output shaft connects to an output gear. The output gear meshes with an input gear. The input gear connects to an input shaft and the input shaft connects to a motor. In such an embodiment, the input gears are fabricated from non-metallic composite materials. In a further refinement of this concept, the output shaft and at least part of the input shaft are disposed within a gearbox, which sealably connects to the housing of the conical mill. Further, the gearbox includes no lubricant because the use of non-metallic composite materials for the input gears eliminates the need for lubricant.
Other advantages and features will be apparent from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the attached drawings.
For a more complete understanding of the disclosed methods and apparatuses, reference should be made to the embodiments illustrated in greater detail in the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The drawings are not necessarily to scale and may illustrate the disclosed embodiments diagrammatically and in partial views. In certain instances, the drawings omit details which are not necessary for an understanding of the disclosed methods and apparatuses or which render other details difficult to perceive. Further, this disclosure is not limited to the particular embodiments illustrated herein.
Each section includes a plurality of openings 54 that may be of a uniform size. However, the spacing distances between the openings 54 vary from the upper section 64 to the lower section 67. The upper section 64 engages to the upper portions of the milling members 71, 72 of the impeller 57, which travel at a faster rotational velocity than lower portions of the milling members 71, 72. Therefore, the upper sections 64 of the screen 50a are exposed to a greater amount of energy from the impeller 57 while the lower section 67 of the screen 50a is exposed to a lower amount of energy from the rotating impeller 57. Generally, the energy delivered by the rotating impeller 57 decreases along the tapered sidewall 51a from the upper section 64 to the bottom section 67. As a result, more openings 54 are required for the upper section 64 in order to reduce the residence time because the flowable material that is being milled in the upper section 64 will be reduced to within the target PSD before the flowable material being milled in the upper middle section 65, lower middle section 66 or lower section 67. In contrast, because the lower section 67 is engaged by the lower portions of the milling members 71, 72 of the impeller 57, which are traveling at the lowest rotational velocity, the flowable material being milled at the lower section 67 is exposed to less energy, and therefore requires a higher residence time to achieve the target PSD. Thus, the lower section 67 has fewer openings 54, longer spacings between openings 54 and a lower open area percentage.
Accordingly, in
In the embodiment shown, the angle γ between the openings 54 for the hole patterns illustrated in
The open area percentage for the four distinct sections 64, 65, 66, 67 of the screen 50a may range from about 30% to about 50% for the upper section 64, from about 25% to about 45% for the upper middle section 65, from about 20% to about 40% for the lower middle section 66 and from about 15% to about 35% for the lower section 67. However, the open area percentages as well as the spacing distances D1-D4 may vary greatly, as will be dependent on the material being milled, the desired PSD, operating conditions and other factors as will be apparent to those skilled in the art. In one non-limiting example, the open area percentages for the sections 64-67 may be 40%, 35%, 30% and 25% respectively.
Turning to
Turning to
Turning to
In addition to the captured O-ring 76 sealing the bottom 56 of the impeller 57 against the output shaft 78, the gearbox 80 also includes a seal assembly 84 that further prevents any cross-contamination between the gearbox 80 and the milling chamber 85 provided by the housing 61 (see
A conical mill 62, an improved gearbox 80 for a conical mill 62, improved frusto-conical screens 50, 50a, 50b, 50c, 50d, 50e and an improved impeller 57 are disclosed herein and are suitable for use in many pharmaceutical, food, chemical or cosmetics applications.
The disclosed conical mills 62, with improved screens 50, 50a, 50b, 50c, 50d, 50e, impeller 57 and gearbox 80, may provide any or all of the following benefits: from about 15% to greater than 50% improvement in narrowing PSDs; up to about 50% reduction in heat generation; from about 30% to greater than about 50% in increased capacity or throughput; reduced sound generation by up to 5 dBs; and the ability to clean the conical mill 62 without the need of opening the milling chamber 85 and without exposing the operator to the milled powder or dust.
While only certain embodiments have been set forth, alternatives and modifications will be apparent from the above description to those skilled in the art. These and other alternatives are considered equivalents and within the spirit and scope of this disclosure and the appended claims.
Watson, Barry, Watson, Sean, Sanguesa, Wilf, Verberne, Jeff
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4759507, | Apr 04 1985 | QUADRO ENGINEERING, BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER QUADRO GP INC | Size reduction machine having an external gap adjustment |
5282579, | Jan 25 1993 | QUADRO ENGINEERING, BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER QUADRO GP INC | Apparatus for adjusting the gap of a size reduction machine |
5330113, | Mar 29 1993 | QUADRO ENGINEERING, BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER QUADRO GP INC | Underdriven size reduction machine |
5405094, | Jan 31 1994 | QUADRO ENGINEERING INC | Multi-staged size reduction machine |
5607062, | Aug 18 1995 | QUADRO ENGINEERING, BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER QUADRO GP INC | Screen module for preparing cosmetics nested screens of different mesh sizes |
5765767, | Aug 11 1995 | Fukae Powtec Corporation | Apparatus for grinding and uniformizing grains and screen with annular working space for use in the apparatus |
6367723, | Feb 07 2000 | The Fitzpatrick Company | Size reduction machine having an adjustable impeller and screen holder |
8900415, | Nov 30 2007 | IFP | Process and device for fluidized bed torrefaction and grinding of a biomass feed for subsequent gasification or combustion |
CN2002981523, | |||
GB609757, | |||
JP2002192017, | |||
JP57500093, | |||
JP7846, | |||
JP889831, | |||
JP9108585, | |||
KR1000934435, | |||
WO2004050249, | |||
WO8102398, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jul 12 2016 | Quadro Engineering Corp. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Feb 05 2018 | SANGUESA, WILF | QUADRO ENGINEERING CORP | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 044986 | /0609 | |
Feb 05 2018 | WATSON, BARRY | QUADRO ENGINEERING CORP | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 044986 | /0609 | |
Feb 07 2018 | VERBERNE, JEFF | QUADRO ENGINEERING CORP | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 044986 | /0609 | |
Feb 07 2018 | WATSON, SEAN | QUADRO ENGINEERING CORP | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 044986 | /0609 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Feb 20 2018 | BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code). |
Oct 16 2024 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 27 2024 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 27 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 27 2025 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 27 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 27 2028 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 27 2028 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 27 2029 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 27 2031 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 27 2032 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 27 2032 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 27 2033 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 27 2035 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |