A method of using removable opaque coating for accurate optical topography measurements on top surfaces of transparent films includes: depositing a highly reflective coating onto a top surface of a wafer, measuring topography on the highly reflective coating, and removing the highly reflective coating from the wafer. The highly reflective coating includes an organic material. The highly reflective coating comprises a refractive index value between one and two. The highly reflective coating comprises a complex wavelength greater than one at six-hundred and thirty-five nanometers. The highly reflective coating reflects at least twenty percent of incident light. The highly reflective coating when deposited maintains an underlayer pattern topography at a resolution of forty by forty micrometers. The highly reflective coating does not cause destructive stress to the wafer.
|
1. A method, comprising:
depositing a layer of opaque coating onto a wafer;
measuring topography on the layer of opaque coating; and
after measuring the topography, removing the layer of opaque coating from the wafer.
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
6. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
11. The method of
12. The method of
13. The method of
14. The method of
15. The method of
16. The method of
17. The method of
18. The method of
|
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 from U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/748,300, entitled “REMOVABLE OPAQUE COATING FOR ACCURATE OPTICAL TOPOGRAPHY MEASUREMENTS ON TOP SURFACES OF TRANSPARENT FILMS,” filed on Oct. 19, 2018, the subject matter of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The described embodiments relate generally to optical topography measurement and more particularly to improved optical topography measurements on top surfaces of transparent films using removable opaque coating.
Optical topography measurements on transparent films on semiconductor wafers are impacted by transparent films effects affecting the accuracy of the measurement. Existing techniques used to compensate for transparent films effects are based on correction models which require additional information about the optical properties and thickness of the film(s). If this additional information about films properties is incorrect or incomplete, the correction will be inaccurate. While correction models may be useful in experimental or engineering analysis with well-known actual optical films properties, they are too complex and too time consuming for production metrology in high volume manufacturing environments with varying actual films properties.
In a first novel aspect, a method of using removable opaque coating for accurate optical topography measurements on top surfaces of transparent films includes: depositing a highly reflective coating onto a top surface of a wafer, measuring topography on the highly reflective coating, and removing the highly reflective coating from the wafer.
In a second novel aspect, the highly reflective coating includes an organic material.
In a third novel aspect, the highly reflective coating comprises a refractive index value between one and two.
In a fourth novel aspect, the highly reflective coating comprises a complex wavelength greater than one at six-hundred and thirty-five nanometers.
In a fifth novel aspect, the highly reflective coating reflects at least twenty percent of incident light.
In a sixth novel aspect, the highly reflective coating when deposited maintains an underlayer pattern topography at a resolution of at least forty by forty micrometers.
In a seventh novel aspect, the highly reflective coating does not cause shape changing stress to the wafer.
Further details and embodiments and techniques are described in the detailed description below. This summary does not purport to define the invention. The invention is defined by the claims.
The accompanying drawings, where like numerals indicate like components, illustrate embodiments of the invention.
Reference will now be made in detail to background examples and some embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. In the description and claims below, relational terms such as “top”, “down”, “upper”, “lower”, “top”, “bottom”, “left” and “right” may be used to describe relative orientations between different parts of a structure being described, and it is to be understood that the overall structure being described can actually be oriented in any way in three-dimensional space.
Wafer shape and topography metrology is an important area and is gaining increasing importance in semiconductor industry. Many inline wafer processing steps comprise the use of one or more transparent layers. Wafers often are fabricated on top of a substrate that is also at least partially transparent. When using optical metrology to measure characteristics of an at least partially transparent layer, not all of the incident light reflects from the top surface. The light that does not reflect from the top surface of the at least partially transparent layer, travels through the at least partially transparent layer and then reflects from other subsequent surfaces. These reflections from subsequent surfaces cause inaccurate optical measurements of the top surface of the at least partially transparent layer. The reason for the inaccuracy is that the light reflecting from the top surface cannot be differentiated from the light reflecting from the bottom surface of the at least partially transparent layer. Therefore, what is a contour on the bottom surface of the at least partially transparent layer may appear as a contour on the top surface of the at least partially transparent layer.
A new method is illustrated in
In one example, the highly reflective coating is an organic material, such as a type of photoresist.
In another example, the highly reflective coating has a refractive index value between one and two.
In another example, the highly reflective coating comprises a complex wavelength greater than one at six-hundred and thirty-five nanometers.
In another example, the highly reflective coating reflects at least twenty percent of incident light.
In another example, the highly reflective coating when deposited maintains an underlayer pattern topography at a resolution of forty by forty micrometers.
In another example, the highly reflective coating does not cause destructive stress to the top transparent layer top surface.
In another example, the highly reflective coating does not cause destructive stress to the top transparent layer.
In another example, the highly reflective coating does not cause destructive or shape or topography changing stress to the wafer.
In another example, the highly reflective coating does not comprise metal.
In another example, the highly reflective coating is opaque.
In step three, topography of the top surface of the wafer coated in highly reflective coating is measured. Measuring top surface topography after coating the wafer provides a more accurate optical topography measurement in the presence of transparent films since transparent films effects such as distortion of the reflected phase or loss of variation of reflected light intensity are avoided.
In step four, the highly reflective coating is removed. The highly reflective coating can be removed using various methodologies. In one example, the highly reflective coating is removed using a solvent. Solvents include, but are not limited to, propylene glycol methyl ether, ethyl lactate, tetramethylammonium hydroxide.
In step 103, once the stop surface topography measurements are completed, the highly reflective coating is removed from the wafer without damaging the wafer. In one example, the reflective coating is removed using solvents, such as propylene glycol methyl ether, ethyl lactate, tetramethylammonium hydroxide. In step 104, the wafer is is further processed for final use.
This method of using removable opaque coating for accurate optical topography measurements on top surfaces of transparent films allows:
Although certain specific embodiments are described above for instructional purposes, the teachings of this patent document have general applicability and are not limited to the specific embodiments described above. Accordingly, various modifications, adaptations, and combinations of various features of the described embodiments can be practiced without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims.
Mueller, Dieter, Saito, Jason, Dighe, Prasanna, Shen, Xiaomeng
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10180316, | Aug 25 2015 | Brodmann Technologies GmbH | Method and device for the contactless assessment of the surface quality of a wafer |
5004340, | Apr 27 1988 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Calibration target for surface analysis scanner systems |
5710069, | Aug 26 1996 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc | Measuring slurry particle size during substrate polishing |
7001642, | Apr 23 1999 | SDC TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Composition for providing an abrasion resistant coating on a substrate with a matched refractive index and controlled tintability |
20030131536, | |||
20100112730, | |||
20120211081, | |||
20160086819, | |||
20180090307, | |||
20180195855, | |||
20190085209, | |||
20200298368, | |||
WO2018067677, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 08 2019 | DIGHE, PRASANNA | KLA Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 050665 | /0341 | |
Oct 08 2019 | SHEN, XIAOMENG | KLA Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 050665 | /0341 | |
Oct 08 2019 | SAITO, JASON | KLA Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 050665 | /0341 | |
Oct 09 2019 | KLA Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jun 09 2021 | MUELLER, DIETER | KLA Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 056490 | /0761 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 09 2019 | BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code). |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jun 29 2024 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Dec 29 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 29 2025 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jun 29 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jun 29 2028 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Dec 29 2028 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 29 2029 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jun 29 2031 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jun 29 2032 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Dec 29 2032 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 29 2033 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jun 29 2035 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |