An annular parts assembly for mounting onto a shaft of an aircraft engine is provided. The assembly comprises a first annular body having a surface defining a plurality of pulling features extending from a remainder of the surface, the pulling features circumferentially spaced apart on the surface. The assembly comprises a second annular body defining a balancing ring, the balancing ring concentric with the first annular body, the balancing ring having a plurality of protrusions and circumferential spaces between adjacent ones of the plurality of protrusions, the circumferential spaces accommodating the pulling features such that the pulling features of the first annular body and the protrusions intercalate.
|
1. A rotary parts assembly for an aircraft engine comprising:
an annular body configured to be removably secured to a shaft of the aircraft engine, the annular body extending radially from the shaft, the annular body having a plurality of pulling features disposed circumferentially therealong;
wherein the pulling features are tabs extending radially inwardly, wherein the tabs each define a pulling face extending radially inwardly, the pulling face is configured to engage axially a pulling tool; and
a balancing ring configured to be removably mounted to the shaft, the balancing ring being concentric with the annular body, the balancing ring having a periphery and portions along said periphery that intercalate with the plurality of pulling features, the pulling features received within circumferential spaces defined between the portions of the balancing ring.
12. An assembly for mounting onto a shaft of an aircraft engine, the assembly comprising:
a balancing ring having a peripheral surface defining a plurality of adjacent protrusions along said peripheral surface, circumferential spaces defined between said protrusions, the balancing ring defining a first annular volume envelope corresponding to a volume of the protrusions and the circumferential spaces of the balancing ring;
an annular body extending radially from the shaft, the annular body having a portion radially aligned with the balancing ring, the annular body having a peripheral surface defining a plurality of adjacent tabs along said peripheral surface, circumferential spaces defined between said tabs, the annular body defining a second annular volume envelope corresponding to a volume of the tabs and the circumferential spaces of the annular body, the balancing ring and the annular body mounted relative to each other such that at least part of the first and second annular volume envelopes overlap and such that the protrusions of the balancing ring are received within the circumferential spaces of the annular body; and
wherein the pulling features are tabs extending radially inwardly, wherein the tabs each define a pulling face extending radially inwardly, the pulling face is configured to engage axially a pulling tool.
2. The rotary parts assembly as defined in
3. The rotary parts assembly as defined in
4. The rotary parts assembly as defined in
5. The rotary parts assembly as defined in
6. The rotary parts assembly as defined in
7. The rotary parts assembly as defined in
8. The rotary parts assembly as defined in
9. The rotary parts assembly as defined in
10. The rotary parts assembly as defined in
11. The rotary parts assembly as defined in
13. The assembly as defined in
14. The assembly as defined in
15. The assembly as defined in
16. The assembly as defined in
17. The assembly as defined in
18. The assembly as defined in
|
The application relates generally to aircraft engines and, more particularly, to rotor balancing assemblies for aircraft engines.
Aircraft engines of various types have rotor assemblies or part subassemblies that include components mounted for rotation about an axis. For instance, aircraft engines often have components coupled together for mutual interaction and/or supporting or interconnecting other components of the engines. These complex assemblies may require proper balancing to limit rotational vibrations during operation of the engines. Balancing of such assemblies and sub-assemblies with suitable balancing components to do so within a limited space of the engine volume envelope may be tedious.
In one aspect, there is provided a rotary parts assembly for an aircraft engine comprising: an annular body configured to be removably secured to a shaft of the aircraft engine, the annular body having a plurality of pulling features disposed circumferentially therealong; and a balancing ring configured to be removably mounted to the shaft, the balancing ring being concentric with the annular body, the balancing ring having a periphery and portions along said periphery that intercalate with the plurality of pulling features.
In another aspect, there is provided an assembly for mounting onto a shaft of an aircraft engine, the assembly comprising: a balancing ring having a peripheral surface defining a plurality of adjacent protrusions along said peripheral surface, circumferential spaces defined between said protrusions, the balancing ring defining a first annular volume envelope corresponding to a volume of the protrusions and the circumferential spaces of the balancing ring; and an annular body having a portion radially aligned with the balancing ring, the annular part having a peripheral surface defining a plurality of adjacent tabs along said peripheral surface, circumferential spaces defined between said tabs, the annular part defining a second annular volume envelope corresponding to a volume of the tabs and the circumferential spaces of the annular part, the balancing ring and the annular part mounted relative to each other such that at least part of the first and second annular volume envelopes overlap.
In a further aspect, there is provided an annular parts assembly for mounting onto a shaft of an aircraft engine, the assembly comprising: a first annular body having a surface defining a plurality of pulling features extending from a remainder of the surface, the pulling features circumferentially spaced apart on the surface; and a second annular body defining a balancing ring, the balancing ring concentric with the first annular body, the balancing ring having a plurality of protrusions and circumferential spaces between adjacent ones of the plurality of protrusions, the circumferential spaces accommodating the pulling features such that the pulling features of the first annular body and the protrusions intercalate.
Reference is now made to the accompanying figures in which:
Aircraft engines, such as the gas turbine engine 10 of
Shafts or other rotary parts mounted for rotation about a rotational axis in an aircraft engine may be mounted within the engine via bearing(s). Rotary parts imbalance may desirably be avoided or limited. Imbalance of rotary parts assemblies may be due to manufacturing capabilities, tolerances, or variabilities, for instance. Assemblies of rotary parts may thus require balancing to reduce and/or limit such imbalance. Referring to
In the depicted embodiment, the rotary part assembly 20 includes a bearing 30 stacked axially between annular bodies 40 along a shaft S. As shown, the bearing 30 includes an inner ring 31 and an outer ring 32 radially spaced apart from each other and rolling elements 33 (e.g. rollers, balls), with a cross-section of one rolling element 33 shown in
The shaft S, which may be one of the engine shafts 19 shown in
The balancing ring 50 is mounted about the shaft S via a spacer SP that interfaces with the shaft S and the balancing ring 50. As shown, the balancing ring 50 and the spacer SP are concentric and are both connected to the shaft S. In other embodiments, the balancing ring 50 may be in direct contact with the shaft S, i.e. without the intermediary spacer SP. Limited space within the engine may require compactness of the assembly 20′. A number of parts have to fit within a limited space inside the engine. This may be due to the tendency to design more compact engines. Accordingly, radial compactness of rotary part assemblies, or sub-assemblies, such as the rotary parts assembly 20′ may be desirable. The annular body 40 and the balancing ring 50 may be shaped to limit the radial footprint of the assembly 20′ once installed in the engine. As will be described later, portions of the annular body 40 and the balancing ring 50 are adapted to intercalate such as to save radial space within a given volume envelope. The geometry of the balancing ring 50 is adapted to interact with the one of the annular bodies 40, as will be discussed later.
The geometry of the annular bodies 40 may vary depending on the embodiments. In the depicted embodiment, the annular bodies 40 form part of a seal runner assembly. The annular bodies 40 are front and rear runners 40F, 40R of such seal runner assembly. The front and rear runners 40F, 40R are named with respect to their relative position along the axis X in the engine orientation. As shown, the front and rear runners 40F, 40R define walls of the bearing cavity BC. The front runner 40F and the rear runner 40R are disposed on opposite sides of the bearing 30, along the axis X.
As shown, the front and rear runners 40F, 40R may limit axial movement of the bearing 30 relative to the shaft S. Front runner 40F is mounted in axial abutment with a radial stopper RS of the shaft S. The radial stopper RS may be a radial wall integral with the shaft S or a separate component secured to the shaft S. The front runner 40F is shown in direct axial contact with the radial stopper RS. Intermediary parts between the radial stopper RS and front runner 40F may be contemplated in other embodiments. In some embodiments, the front runner 40F is mounted in a tight fit relationship with the shaft S to block the axial position of the front runner 40F with respect to the shaft S. The rear runner 40R abuts axially against the bearing 30, in this case its inner ring 31. There may be an intermediary part between the rear runner 40R and the inner ring 31 of the bearing 30 in other embodiments. In some embodiments, the rear runner 40R is mounted in a tight fit relationship with the shaft S.
As shown, the front and rear runners 40F, 40R form walls of a bearing cavity BC. As shown, the bearing 30 is disposed in the bearing cavity BC. The bearing cavity BC may contain lubricant for cooling and/or lubricating purposes. As shown, at least the rotating elements 33 of the bearing 30 are in fluid communication with the lubricant of the bearing cavity BC. The bearing cavity BC is sealed to limit leakage of lubricant outside the bearing cavity BC. Although the bearing cavity BC defines a sealed cavity enclosing the bearing 30, lubricant may be channeled through one or more canals defined through walls of components surrounding the bearing cavity BC.
During assembly, the front and rear runners 40F, 40R may be heated to thermally expand. The front and rear runners 40F, 40R may be mounted about the shaft S while being in a heated state, such that when cooled down, the front and rear runners 40F, 40R may be tight fitted on the shaft S. To facilitate disassembly of the front and/or rear runners 40F, 40R from the shaft S, for instance for maintenance or for replacement of parts on the shaft S (e.g. replacement of bearing 30), the front runner 40F and/or rear runner 40R have pulling features 41. Such pulling features 41 may have different configurations, which will be discussed with reference to some embodiments and the following figures.
Referring to
As shown in
As illustrated in
The tabs 41A may have different shapes or be identical, depending on the embodiments. For instance, one or more of the tabs 41A may be shaped differently than others. In the depicted embodiment, the tabs 41A have a trapezoidal shape. The tabs 41A have a top surface extending between opposite chamfered surfaces when viewed in plane P (see
It may be desirable to reduce a radial distance RD between the pulling feature 41 and the shaft S radially underneath the pulling feature 41. Limiting such radial distance may facilitate disengagement of the tight fitted annular body 40 from the shaft S, without (or with limited) deformation of the annular body 40 due to the pulling force exerted thereon. The radial distance RD may be from 20% to 90% of the radial foot print RFP. In a particular embodiment, such radial distance RD is no more than 50%±10% of the radial foot print RFP of the annular body 40. This may help maintaining a limited distance between the tight fit interface and the axial pulling force, which in turn may help limit deformation of the annular body 40 during pull.
As mentioned above, portions of the annular body 40 and the balancing ring 50 are adapted to intercalate within a given volume envelope. Referring to
As shown, portions of the pulling features 41 intercalate with portions of the balancing ring 50. In the depicted embodiment, and referred to with respect to additional figures later, the balancing ring 50 has a periphery 50′, and portions along said periphery 50′ adapted to intercalate with the pulling features 41. In the depicted embodiment, the balancing ring 50 defines a plurality of protrusions 51 extending radially outwardly, here along the outer periphery, though protrusions 51 could be along the inner periphery in other embodiments. The protrusions 51 may be referred to as tabs, teeth, crenellations, etc. The plurality of protrusions 51 are spaced apart circumferentially. A circumferential space 52 is defined between adjacent protrusions 51. In
Similar to that discussed above with respect to the pulling features 41, the balancing ring 50 may define an annular volume envelope, shown as V2 (see also on
In some embodiments, the geometry of a pulling feature 41 may correspond to the shape of a circumferential space 52. In other words, their respective contour lines may have the same relief in some embodiments. The pulling features 41 may thus register or mate within the circumferential spaces 52. The geometry of the pulling features 41 may not correspond to the shape of the circumferential spaces 52 in other embodiments. Yet, the geometry of the pulling features 41 and/or protrusions 51 and/or the shape of a circumferential spaces 52 may be different from that shown. For instance, their respective contour lines may be curved or rounded, such as to define a wave profile.
The radial overlapping (or partial overlapping in some embodiments) of the volume envelopes V1, V2 of the pulling features 41 and the balancing ring 50 may allow more radial compactness, which may reduce the overall diameter of the outermost part, here being the annular body 40. Reducing the overall diameter of the outermost part may result in a radial space gain within a given volume envelope inside the aircraft engines. Such radial space gain may in turn be beneficial on weight savings and/or overall volume decrease of part subassembly 20′. In some instances, such radial space gain may allow creating more empty space, thereby increasing an engine internal volume that may be dedicated to cooling zones. In some instances, such radial space gain may allow having a balancing ring 50 with a greater diameter than that if pulling features 41 and intercalating configuration were absent.
Referring to
In some embodiments, at least one of the protrusions 51 may have a different shape than other ones. In the depicted embodiment, the balancing ring 50 includes three differently shaped protrusions 51, which are referred to as elements 53. As shown, in an embodiment, these differently shaped protrusions 53 are different in that their respective top surfaces 51E have a greater arc length AL than the other ones of the protrusions 51. In other embodiments, their arc length AL may be shorter than that of the other ones of the protrusions 51. As another possibility, these differently shaped protrusions 53 may be curved or rounded, whereas the other ones of the protrusions 51 may have the configuration shown in
Counterweights may be coupled to the balancing ring 50 at desired locations along its circumference to balance/counterbalance a measured imbalance of the subassembly 20′, for instance. Imbalance measurement methods will not be further described herein. Suffice it to say that imbalance of a rotor assembly 20 or part subassembly 20′ may be experimentally or numerically determined. Counterweights may then be installed on the balancing ring 50 to compensate (at least partially) such imbalance. Coupling of counterweights, such as counterweight 60 shown in
The embodiments described in this document provide non-limiting examples of possible implementations of the present technology. Upon review of the present disclosure, a person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described herein without departing from the scope of the present technology. For instance, the balancing ring may be mounted radially outward relative to the annular bodies, such as the intercalated features discussed above may be inverted radially compared to that shown in the figures.
It is observed that the intercalating can be described as the smallest diameter defined jointly by the inward pulling features of the various embodiments that is smaller than the largest diameter defined jointly by the outward protrusions of the balancing ring. A reverse arrangement is also possible, namely the smallest diameter defined jointly by the inward protrusions of the balancing ring that is smaller than the largest diameter defined jointly by the outward pulling features.
The present disclosure may be applied to any annular parts concentrically mounted relative to each other. For instance, a first annular part and a second annular part may be concentric with each other, the first part having an outer periphery shape adapted to accommodate or intercalate with portions of the inner periphery of the second part, such that an outermost portion of the first part may penetrate in the volume envelope of the second part and/or vice versa. Yet further modifications could be implemented by a person of ordinary skill in the art in view of the present disclosure, which modifications would be within the scope of the present technology.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10392953, | Jun 15 2017 | RTX CORPORATION | Ring seal arrangement |
3964342, | Jul 22 1974 | General Motors Corporation | Turbine shaft balancing |
4130399, | Oct 06 1976 | Aktiebolaget SKF | Dismantling tool |
4220055, | Sep 23 1977 | Societe Nationale d'Etude et de Construction de Moteurs d'Aviation | Device to balance a rotor |
4776763, | Dec 02 1987 | Sundstrand Corporation | Mechanical damping of turbine wheel blades |
7334980, | Mar 28 2005 | RTX CORPORATION | Split ring retainer for turbine outer air seal |
7661928, | Jun 24 2005 | SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES | Device for rotationally locking a clamping nut for a component on a shaft, clamping nut and shaft comprising it, and aircraft engine equipped therewith |
7775723, | Jul 15 2004 | SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES | Assembly including a rotary shaft and a roller bearing |
7912587, | Jul 25 2007 | Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp | Method of balancing a gas turbine engine rotor |
8579538, | Jul 30 2010 | RTX CORPORATION | Turbine engine coupling stack |
8888458, | Mar 12 2012 | RTX CORPORATION | Turbomachine rotor balancing system |
9920626, | May 19 2014 | SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES | Balanced rotor disc, and balancing method |
9989083, | May 26 2015 | Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp.; Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp | Seal and bearing assembly for a gas turbine engine and method of assembling same |
20020134191, | |||
20050244272, | |||
20110081253, | |||
20170370224, | |||
EP1817227, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 19 2020 | PELLERIN, HUGUES | Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 052806 | /0255 | |
Jun 02 2020 | Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 02 2020 | BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code). |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 25 2025 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 25 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 25 2026 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 25 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 25 2029 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 25 2030 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 25 2030 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 25 2032 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 25 2033 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 25 2034 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 25 2034 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 25 2036 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |