A method of forming a balanced rotor blade assembly includes measuring a weight of a plurality of sub-components of the rotor blade assembly excluding a core. A configuration of a core of the rotor blade assembly is determined. In combination, the core and the plurality of sub-components achieve a target weight distribution and moment. The core is then fabricated and assembled with the plurality of sub-components to form a rotor blade sub-assembly.
|
1. A method of forming a balanced sub-assembly of a rotor blade assembly comprising:
measuring a weight of a plurality of sub-components of the rotor blade assembly excluding a core;
determining, by a processor, responsive to the measured weight of the plurality of sub-components of the rotor blade assembly excluding the core, a configuration of a plurality of cells, based on a weight distribution of the plurality of sub-components, the plurality of cells including a first plurality of cells having a first density creating a first weight in a first area of the core and including a second plurality of cells having a second density creating a second weight in a second area of the core to form the core such that in combination the core having the first weight in the first area and the second weight in the second area and the plurality of sub-components achieve a target weight distribution and moment for the rotor blade assembly, each cell including a cell opening bounded by at least one cell wall;
determining, by the processor, a first anticipated stress in the first area and a second anticipated stress in the second area, the second anticipated stress being lower than the first anticipated stress;
fabricating, via an additive manufacturing process, the core based at least in part on the configuration of the plurality of cells determined by the processor and the first anticipated stress and the second anticipated stress determined by the processor, wherein (1) the second density is lower than the first density and (2) the core is a unitary core; and
assembling the plurality of sub-components and the core to form a rotor blade sub-assembly having the target weight distribution and moment for the rotor blade assembly.
2. The method according to
4. The method according to
determining a weight distribution based of the plurality of sub-components;
determining a weight distribution of the core necessary to achieve a target weight distribution and moment of the sub-assembly.
5. The method according to
determining at least one of a shape, density, wall thickness, and material of the core.
6. The method according to
7. The method according to
8. The method according to
9. The method according to
forming the plurality of cells, each cell including a cell opening bounded by at least one cell well, wherein at least one cell of the plurality of cells includes end flange connected to a cell wall.
10. The method according to
12. The method according to
determining an optimized configuration of the core panel.
|
This application claims the benefit of Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/375,087, filed Aug. 15, 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The subject matter disclosed herein generally relates to rotor blades, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for providing a properly balanced rotor blade.
In order to operate properly in a dynamic environment, the rotor blade on a rotary wing aircraft must be properly balanced to avoid an increased level of vibration. The rotor blades are typically manufactured using a plurality of components. As a result, the weight can vary between what are intended to be identically balanced blades.
In order for the rotor blades to perform properly, the weight distribution and the resultant moments of the blade must meet predetermined criteria which define target distribution and moments along the length or span of the blade from root to tip, and also chordally, from the leading edge to the trailing edge thereof. Achieving the predetermined weight distribution criteria will result in a “balanced” rotor blade that will operate properly for its intended application. Thus, each rotor blade must be individually checked for weight distribution and must be brought into balance. The conventional procedures for balancing a rotor blade assembly are time-consuming.
In one embodiment, a method of forming a balanced rotor blade sub-assembly includes measuring a weight of a plurality of sub-components of the rotor blade assembly excluding a core. A configuration of a core of the rotor blade assembly is determined. In combination, the core and the plurality of sub-components achieve a target weight distribution and moment. The core is then fabricated and assembled with the plurality of sub-components to form a rotor blade sub-assembly.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the core is fabricated via an additive manufacturing process.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments at least one property of the core varies across at least one of a span, chord, and thickness of the rotor blade assembly.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the core comprises a core panel including a plurality of cells, each cell including a cell opening bounded by at least one cell wall.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments determining a configuration of the core further includes determining a weight distribution based of the plurality of sub-components and determining a weight distribution of the core necessary to achieve a target weight distribution and moment of the sub-assembly.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments determining a configuration of the core further comprises determining at least one of a shape, density, wall thickness, and material of the core.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments determining a configuration of the core in response to the weight of the plurality of sub-components is performed automatically via an algorithm executed by a processor.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments anticipated stresses of the rotor blade assembly are provided as an input to the algorithm.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments structural and dimensional requirements of the core panel are provided as an input to the algorithm.
According to another embodiment, a rotor blade sub-assembly includes a plurality of sub-components and a core. In combination, the core and the plurality of sub-components achieve a target weight distribution and moment such that the rotor blade sub-assembly is balanced.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments a weight distribution of the core corresponds to a weight distribution of the plurality of sub-components.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the rotor blade sub-assembly does not require adhesive to achieve the target weight distribution and moment.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the core is formed from a core panel including a plurality of cells, each cell including a cell opening bounded by at least one cell wall.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments at least one property of the core varies across at least one of a span, chord, and thickness of the rotor blade sub-assembly.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the core is formed via an additive manufacturing process.
These and other advantages and features will become more apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the drawings.
The subject matter is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other features, and advantages of the present disclosure are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
The detailed description explains embodiments of the present disclosure, together with advantages and features, by way of example with reference to the drawings.
Referring to
The rotor blade sections define a span R of the main rotor blade assembly 20 between the axis of rotation A and a distal end 30 of the tip cap 28 such that any radial station may be expressed as a percentage in terms of a blade radius x/R. The rotor blade assembly 20 defines a longitudinal feathering axis P between a leading edge 32 and a trailing edge 34. The distance between the leading edge 32 and the trailing edge 34 defines a chord length.
An example of a rotor blade assembly 20 of a rotary wing aircraft 10 is illustrated in more detail in
The tip assembly 42 generally includes a tip spar 48T, a tip core 46T, a tip leading edge assembly 68 and the tip cap 28. The tip cap 28 may be removably attached to the tip spar 48T though hardware 70 in a cap interface to close-out the end of the tip assembly 42. The tip leading edge assembly 68 may also include a splice cap laminate 54T and a tip erosion strip 72 to provide abrasion protection. The tip cap 28 also includes an erosion cap 76. The tip erosion strip 72 and the erosion cap 76 may include AM355, titanium, nickel, or a variety of other wear-resistant materials or combinations thereof. The rotor blade assembly 20 illustrated and described herein is intended as an example only, and it should be understood that other rotor blade constructions are within the scope of the disclosure.
With reference now to
The core panel 47 may be formed to have engineered non-uniform properties along at least one of a panel length 86, panel width 88, and/or panel thickness 90 (shown in
In other embodiments, such as shown in
Referring to the cross-sectional view of
In another embodiment, shown in
It is to be appreciated that while for clarity of the description and drawings, the core cell 47 modifications or non-uniformities are presented separately, one skilled in the art will readily recognize that the non-uniformities shown in
During the manufacture of a conventional rotor blade assembly, at least a portion of the sub-components of the assembly is weighed. As the sub-components are connected to one another, adhesive is added to one or more portions of the assembly. The adhesive is intended to add weight to the assembly where needed such that the weight distribution and the resultant moments of the rotor blade assembly meet the predetermined criteria necessary for the rotor blade to be considered “balanced.”
A method 200 of forming a balanced rotor blade assembly 20 is illustrated in
The configuration of the core panel 47 is customized in view of the weight distribution of the other sub-components such that when the rotor blade is fully assembled, the assembly 20 has a desired weight distribution and moment. As a result, the need to include adhesive at various portions of the assembly to achieve a “balanced” rotor blade assembly 20 is eliminated.
In an embodiment, an algorithm may be used to determine an optimized configuration of the core panel 47 in view of one or more inputs. The algorithm may be implemented through any suitable means, such as for example, in a computing environment with a processor such as a CPU. The inputs provided to the algorithm may include the structural and dimensional requirements of the core panel 47 and also the weight distribution of the sub-components of the rotor blade assembly excluding the core panel 47. Accordingly, the algorithm is configured to determine a corresponding weight distribution of the core panel 47 necessary to achieve a target weight distribution and moment to achieve a balanced rotor blade. In view of the required weight distribution of the core panel 47, and in further view of the stresses at each region of the rotor blade assembly 20, a cell structure 80, including shape, density, and material, is determined for the entire core panel 47. In an embodiment, the algorithm is configured to perform a finite element analysis or use other design and analysis tools. Accordingly, the design configuration of the core panel 47 may be modified or iterated until the plurality of requirements associated with the core panel 47 are met.
Once the design of the core panel 47 has been established, the core panel 47 is manufactured by one or more manufacturing methods based on the material utilized and/or the desired structure of the core panel 47. These manufacturing methods may include additive manufacturing methods such as material deposition, 3-D printing, laser sintering, or the like. Such manufacturing processes allow for the formation of a unitary core panel 47 having locally varied properties and dimensional features as described above. Additive manufacturing methods used in formation of the core panel 47 provide a high degree of flexibility in fabrication options enabling local optimization.
It should be understood that although the method of forming a balanced rotor blade assembly is illustrated and described with respect to a main rotor blade assembly, blades of a tail rotor assembly or thrust generation system are also contemplated herein. In addition, the method of forming a rotor blade described herein may be used in numerous applications, including but not limited to rotary wing aircraft, fixed wing aircraft, turbines, wind mills, and marine propellers for example.
A core panel 47 as described herein may be engineered with non-uniform properties to achieve the precise mechanical properties required by design. Those properties can be tailored to continuously change across one or more of the span, chord, and thickness of the rotor blade. In an embodiment, the core panel may be customized based on the weight of the other sub-components of a rotor blade assembly to form a rotor blade assembly with a balanced weight and moment. As a result, the dynamic balancing of the rotor blade assembly 20 may be improved, or alternatively, eliminated.
While the present disclosure has been described in detail in connection with only a limited number of embodiments, it should be readily understood that the present disclosure is not limited to such disclosed embodiments. Further, the present disclosure can be modified to incorporate any number of variations, alterations, substitutions or equivalent arrangements not heretofore described, but which are commensurate in spirit and/or scope. Additionally, while various embodiments have been described, it is to be understood that aspects of the present disclosure may include only some of the described embodiments. Accordingly, the present disclosure is not to be seen as limited by the foregoing description, but is only limited by the scope of the appended claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2793718, | |||
2814717, | |||
3072225, | |||
4078422, | Jun 24 1975 | Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH | Adjusting the static moment of a rotor blade |
4095322, | Aug 30 1976 | The Boeing Company | Method of fabricating a composite aerodynamic rotorblade assembly |
4968367, | Sep 08 1987 | STAMICARBON B.V. | Process for producing formed article of tubular elements |
5475622, | Aug 31 1994 | United Technologies Corp.; United Technologies Corporation | Method and apparatus for balancing helicopter rotor blades |
8360733, | Sep 09 2011 | LM WIND POWER US TECHNOLOGY APS | Rotor blade for a wind turbine and methods of manufacturing the same |
8851856, | Aug 06 2010 | ROHR, INC | Rotor blade comprising structural elements |
8870547, | Aug 24 2010 | Airbus Operations GmbH | Structural element for an aircraft and spacecraft and method for producing a structural element of this type |
9217331, | Feb 27 2015 | Borgwarner Inc. | Impeller balancing using additive process |
20090252608, | |||
20130000247, | |||
20130149166, | |||
20130189086, | |||
20140199175, | |||
20140341746, | |||
20140377076, | |||
20150003970, | |||
20150190981, | |||
20180044002, | |||
20180045174, | |||
20180169993, | |||
CA2859329, | |||
DE102012016309, | |||
DE2738895, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Aug 16 2016 | DANIELS, AARON | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 043207 | /0620 | |
Jul 26 2017 | COTTON, ERIC | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 043207 | /0620 | |
Aug 04 2017 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jan 10 2026 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jul 10 2026 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 10 2027 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jan 10 2029 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jan 10 2030 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jul 10 2030 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 10 2031 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jan 10 2033 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jan 10 2034 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jul 10 2034 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 10 2035 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jan 10 2037 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |