device for controlling by means of a current program a plurality of solenoid valves operating independently. Each solenoid is provided with a current flow control circuit having two inputs. The first input receives a first control signal which determines the duration of each actuation of the corresponding solenoid valve. The second input receives a second control signal derived from the first signal and of lesser duration. The current flow control circuit then provides a pull current to actuate the solenoid in response to these input signals.
|
1. A device for controlling a plurality of solenoid valves operating independently, wherein there is provided for each solenoid valve a current flow control circuit comprising two inputs, the first of said inputs being adapted to receive a first control signal which determines by its duration each actuation of the corresponding solenoid valve, the second of said inputs being adapted to receive a second control signal derived from said first control signal and of a lesser duration, said current flow control circuit being responsive to said first and second signals to cause the actuation of the solenoid valve with a pull current greater than the holding current and having the duration of said first control signal, said device further comprising a plurality of differentiating circuits one connected to each of said first inputs of said control circuits and responsive to the leading edge of the corresponding first control signal, a monostable multivibrator having its input connected to be responsive to the output signals of all the differentiating circuits and an output forming said second control signal, and said monostable multivibrator connected to apply said second control signal to all of said second inputs of said current flow control circuits of the solenoid valves.
2. A device as set forth in
3. A device as set forth in
4. A device as set forth in
5. A device as set forth in
6. control device as set forth in
|
The present invention relates to a device of the current-programme type for controlling a plurality of solenoid valves operating asynchronously, simultaneously or not.
Most solenoid-operated valves utilized in industrial applications are controlled in the "0 or maximum" fashion, that is, by means of an electronic switch applying or not a voltage to their terminals. However, certain high-efficiency solenoid valves designed for delivering precision-gauged fluid outputs with very short response times cannot accept such a coarse control method. This is observed notably in the case of electromagnetic fuel injectors of internal combustion engines. In fact, to be quick-acting these solenoid valves must have a very low internal resistance and withstand a relatively high initial or starting voltage. Under these conditions, to avoid excessive currents some servo means must be used for controlling the system in order to keep at a relatively constant value the current flowing through the solenoid coil, and various servo means of this type have already been proposed in the art.
However, a major shortcoming of existing systems is the considerable loss of power in the control units due to the high value of the regulation current, which is necessary for minimizing the transition time of the shutter member of the solenoid valve.
These shortcomings can be avoided by using the control device of this invention.
The present invention consists in applying a method known per se but of which the application has led up to now only to complicated and scarcely accurate solenoid valve control systems. The method applied in the control device of this invention consists in delivering a constant pull current during a constant time called pull time, and then maintaining the current at a lower value corresponding to the holding current during the subsequent or remaining time period in which the valve remains open. Preferably, the shape of the pull-current transition curve is exponential.
The device according to this invention is therefore directed to accomplish the above-defined current programme in a plurality of solenoid valves adapted to operate independently, by using simple means while meeting definite precision requirements concerning the holding current, the pull time and the pull current.
FIG. 1 of the attached drawings illustrates the current programme to be accomplished. During the control gating pulse shown in FIG. 1A the solenoid valve is open due to the absence of voltage, and current builds up according to the diagram of FIG. 1B. A first time period tA corresponds to a high-value current IA and during the remaining time period corresponding to the opening time tt of FIG. 1A the current is kept at a value IM and is finally switched off.
According to this invention, the current-programme control device for at least two solenoid-operated valves operating independently in which each solenoid valve is connected in series between the voltage U of the supply mains and a control circuit comprising notably an input for receiving the control signal and a current amplifier, is characterized in that it comprises a series of branch circuits connected to the control signal receiving inputs, respectively, and leading as inputs to an OR gate having its output connected to the input of a univibrator having a predetermined response time, and that each control circuit incorporates a JK-type flip-flop having its clock input connected to the control circuit input and its non-reversing output connected to the input of the current amplifier, the reset input being connected to the inverter output of the univibrator.
This univibrator is controlled by the trailing edge of each of the solenoid valve control signals. Thus, when any one of said solenoid valves must be opened, a signal appears at the output of said univibrator during a time tA. The current generating or control circuit of each solenoid valve is so constructed that it delivers a current equal to the holding current IM during the opening time of the solenoid valve, and that it takes into account at the beginning of each valve opening, and only at the beginning, the signal from said univibrator due to the provision of the JK type flip-flop, said signal thus causing the current to rise up to its value IA.
It is thus possible to control via the same monostable circuit a relatively great number of solenoid valves opening independently. Therefore, the degree of precision attainable in the component elements of the monostable circuit may be extremely high since only one such circuit is required. Besides, each current generator may be constructed in such a way that the current flowing through the solenoid valve be proportional to a single voltage V. Thus, the degree of precision of the current flowing through each solenoid valve is subordinate to the precision of a single voltage, a requirement easily met, so that a particularly simple, economical and accurate circuit can be obtained.
In one embodiment of the present invention the device for controlling the plurality of solenoid valves employs a current flow control circuit for each valve and wherein the control flow circuit has two inputs. The first input receives the control signal which is to be fed to the solenoid and which determines the duration of the actuation of the corresponding solenoid. The second input of the control circuit is a signal derived from the first control circuit but has a duration less than the first control circuit. These two signals are then employed in conjunction to produce a pull current signal for actuating the solenoid which is greater than the initial holding current signal but has the duration of the first control signal. The second signal is derived from the first signal by means of a differentiating circuit and the appropriate timing is provided by the use of a monostable multivibrator connected to receive the differentiated signals.
The control circuit in a preferred embodiment employs a voltage current converter for producing current flows connected to the appropriate solenoids. A voltage divider and switch means connected to the voltage divider produce the two different level control voltages which are then fed to the voltage current converter.
Moreover, according to another feature characterizing this invention, a so-called "forcing" input is provided whereby the maximum current can be applied throughout the time the valve remains open. Thus, the valves can be operated under particularly severe conditions.
Other features characterizing this invention will appear as the following description proceeds with reference to the attached drawings illustrating diagrammatically by way of example a typical form of embodiment of the invention. In the drawings:
FIG. 1, as already mentioned in the foregoing, is an explanatory diagram illustrating the programmation of control current in a solenoid valve as a function of the control voltage;
FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of the complete control device of this invention;
FIG. 3 illustrates the wiring diagram of the control circuit associated with each valve; and
FIG. 4 is a waveform diagram corresponding to the operation of the control device of this invention.
In the various Figures of the drawings, the same reference numerals and symbols designate the same component elements.
Referring now to FIG. 2, the control signals E1 . . . Ei . . . En corresponding to one of the n solenoid-operated valves EV1 . . . EVi . . . EVn are fed on the one hand to the input Ii of control circuits A1 . . . Ai . . . An of solenoid valves EVi, and on the other hand to one of the inputs of an OR function logic gate 1 via a differentiation circuit comprising a resistor Ri, a diode Di and a capacitor Ci. The output 2 of OR logic gate 1 is connected to the input 3 of a monostable univibrator circuit 4; the response time of this circuit 4 is determined by means of a resistor 6 and a capacitor 7. The inverter output 8 of this circuit is connected in parallel to the input Mi of each solenoid valve control circuit Ai via a two-input NO-AND function logic gate 9 of which the second gate receives the "forcing" signal F. Each solenoid valve EVi is connected on the one hand to the source of current delivering a voltage U and on the other hand to the output Si of its companion control circuit Ai.
As shown in FIG. 3, in a typical control circuit Ai the control signal Ei is fed to the circuit input Ii connected on the one hand to the base of a transistor 10 via a resistor 11 and on the other to the clock input 12 of a JK-type flip-flop 13 via a series-connected resistor 14 and a grounded capacitor 15.
The inputs J, 16 and K, 17 of flip-flop 13 are set to "one" and the reset input 18 is connected to the input Mi of control circuit Ai, i.e. to the output 8 of monostable univibrator 4 via gate 9 (see FIG. 2).
The output Q, 19 of flip-flop 13 is connected via a resistor 20 to the collector of transistor 10 connected in turn to the reference voltage terminal V via a resistor 21, to a capacitor 22 via a diode 23 and to the non-reversing input of an operational amplifier 24 via a resistive dividing bridge consisting of a pair of resistors 25 and 26. Connected in parallel to capacitor 22 is the collector-to-emitter gap of transistor 27 having its base connected to the base of transistor 10. The output of amplifier 24 is fed via a resistor 28 to another transistor 29 through the collector of which the solenoid coil of valve EVi is energized. The emitter of the same transistor 29 is connected on the one hand via a grounded resostir 30 and on the other hand via a resistor 31 to the inverter input of amplifier 24. Finally, a Zener diode 32 is inserted between the collector and base of transistor 29.
The mode of operations of this control device will now be explained with reference to the wiring diagrams of FIGS. 2 and 3 and to the waveform diagrams of FIG. 4, the latter corresponding to the independently operation of a pair of solenoid valves EV1 and EV2 in order to simplify the disclosure. In FIG. 4 the first waveform diagram 1 shows the waveform of the control signal at input E1, the opening of solenoid valve EV1 corresponding to the lower portion of the signal. Line 2 of FIG. 4 illustrates similarly the waveform of the signal obtaining at the control input E2 of valve EV2. These signals are differentiated by capacitor-diode-resistor circuits denoted C1, D1, R1 and C2, D2, C2 respectively. The type of circuit utilized herein corresponds to the generation, at the output 2 of OR gate 1, of a pulse at each trailing edge of one of said signals Ei, i.e., the leading edge of each signal tt, as shown in FIG. 1. The signal obtaining at the output 2 of said gate 1 is illustrated in line 3 of FIG. 4 in the case described herein. The output signal obtaining at the output 8 of monostable univibrator 4 is shown in line 4 of FIG. 4. The duration of the thus delivered pulse is proportional to the value of resistor 6 and capacitor 7, and corresponds on the other hand to the time tA of operation of the solenoid valve with a high current IA (see FIG. 1). If the forcing input F is set at "one", i.e. inoperative, the signal fed to inputs Mi of the control elements is the inverse of the signal available at the output 8 of monostable univibrator 4. This signal (Mi) is shown line 5 of the waveform diagram of FIG. 4.
The output circuit of control element Ai is a conventional current generating circuit. The assembly comprising amplifier 24, resistor 28, transistor 29 generates in the output circuit (solenoid valve EVi, transistor 29, resistor 30) a current of such value that the voltage across the terminals of resistor 30 is equal to the voltage at the input 23 of amplifier 24. Thus, this voltage Uc will monitor the current in the solenoid according to the relationship:
IEV =(Uc /R30)
wherein:
Iei is the current flowing through the solenoid coil, and
R30 is the value of resistor 30.
The Zener diode 32 protects transistor 29 against voltage surges caused by solenoid valve EVi.
When the signal obtaining at Ii is equal to one (the solenoid coil is de-energized) transistor 10 is saturated and its collector voltage, to which Ue is equal, approaches zero, irrespective of the state of flip-flop 13. The current flowing through the solenoid coil is effectively zero. When the signal appearing at Ii becomes zero, the trailing edge of the signal is transmitted with a certain time lag due to the presence of resistor 14 and capacitor 15, and also to the provision of flip-flop 13 of which the output 19 is changed to "one", i.e. to V+, since the signal at Mi was also changed to "one" a short time before. Similarly, the change to zero of input Ii is attended by the non-conducting of transistors 10 and 27. Capacitor 22 is charged through the diode 23 and the parallel-connected resistors 20 and 21, until the voltage across the capacitor terminals, except for the threshold of diode 23, reaches the value V+. In this case, the value of voltage Uc will be: ##EQU1## wherein: R26 is the value of resistor 26, and
R25 is the value of resistor 25.
This stage of the control operation corresponds to the pull current IA which is generated in an exponential manner as a function of time due to the charge of capacitor 22.
When the signal present at Mi from monostable univibrator 4 and having the shape illustrated in line 5 of FIG. 4 becomes again zero, flip-flop 13 is reset. This corresponds to the elimination of the pull current after the period defined by the monostable univibrator 4. Therefore, current IM must be programmed. In fact, voltage Uc subsequently assumes a lower value: ##EQU2## if R20, R21, R26 and R25 designate the values of resistors 20, 21, 26, 25 respectively. The presence of a diode 23 will thus neutralize the action of capacitor 22. When signal Ii resumes the "one" value, transistors 10 and 27 become again conductive causing on the one hand the suppression of current in the solenoid and on the other hand the discharge of capacitor 22.
In the specific case contemplated herein, the signals are consistant with the waveforms illustrated in FIG. 4:
line 6 for the output 19 of flip-flop 13 of control element A1,
line 7 for the current control voltage Uc, also at A1,
line 8 for the output 19 of flip-flop 13 of control element A2,
line 9 for the current control voltage Uc, also at A2.
Since the univibrator circuit is common to both valve circuits and the solenoid valves can be operated simultaneously, it may happen that an output signal from monostable univibrator 4 occurs at M1 for instance when solenoid valve 2 is released. However, due to the absence, at that time, of any signal at E1, the flip-flop is not set and reset signal M1 is inoperative. The mode of operation is the same even with a considerable number of solenoid operated valves so that these valves will neither interfere with each other nor give rise to any interaction.
It may be noted that the two currents IA and IM, through the medium of Uc, are proportional to voltage V which may be common to all the devices Ai.
A common monostable circuit and a common reference voltage obviously constitute two factors of precision combined with constructional simplicity.
When the forcing signal F is rendered operative, i.e. at zero condition, the inputs Mi of devices Ai are constantly in condition "one" corresponding to the non-resetting of flip-flops 13, and therefore to the permanence, for Uc, of the above-defined value (Uc)A corresponding to pull current IA.
The type of voltage-current transformer (amplifier 24, transistor 29, resistors 28, 30, 31 and Zener diode 32) utilized for converting Uc into a current IEV in the solenoid valve is immaterial. In fact, many other devices may be contemplated and selected among existing systems for performing the same functions without departing from the basic principles of the present invention.
The above-described device may be used for controlling the fuel injectors of an internal combustion engine. However, it may also be used in combination with an anti-lock braking circuit, with a hydrostatic transmission and, in other technical fields, in combination with any quick-operating solenoid valve system.
It is thought that the improvements provided by the present invention and many of its attendant advantages will be understood from the foregoing description and it will be apparent that various changes may be made in the form, construction and arrangement of the parts thereof described without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention or sacrificing all of its material advantages, the form hereinbefore described being merely exemplary embodiment thereof.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10527188, | Feb 24 2016 | TRUMA GERAETETECHNIK GMBH & CO. KG; TRUMA GERAETETECHNIK GMBH & CO KG | Gas valve and method for actuation thereof |
10867734, | Oct 19 2016 | ZF Friedrichshafen AG | Inductive load control |
4300508, | Sep 26 1978 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Installation for operating electromagnetic loads in internal combustion engines |
4597369, | May 25 1981 | Nissan Motor Company, Limited | Fuel cutoff apparatus for fuel injection pump for diesel engine |
4644179, | Mar 30 1984 | Etudes et Commercialisation d'Appareils Nouveaux Speciaus, ECANS | Electronically controlled electromagnetic safety battery cut-out for transport of dangerous or other materials |
4898361, | Apr 28 1989 | General Motors Corporation; Delco Electronics Corporation | Submodulation of a pulse-width-modulated solenoid control valve |
5099198, | Aug 01 1989 | Alfred Teves GmbH | Circuit configuration for monitoring the final stages of a plurality of valves |
5438489, | Sep 30 1993 | Caterpillar Inc | Solenoid driver circuit and diagnostics |
5442511, | Mar 30 1993 | Caterpillar Inc.; Caterpillar Inc | Generic solenoid driver circuit board, circuit and method of making same |
5877931, | Jul 23 1996 | C R F SOCIETA CONSORTILE PER AZIONI; C R F SOCIETA CONSORTILE PER AZIONI | Device for controlling inductive loads, in particular of injectors of an internal combustion engine injection system |
6024071, | Apr 28 1995 | BRP US INC | Process for driving the exciting coil of an electromagnetically driven reciprocating piston pump |
7746620, | Feb 22 2008 | Baxter International Inc.; Baxter Healthcare S.A. | Medical fluid machine having solenoid control system with temperature compensation |
7758015, | Dec 27 2005 | SMC Kabushiki Kaisha | Solenoid-operated valve controller |
7782590, | Feb 22 2008 | BAXTER HEALTHCARE S A | Medical fluid machine having solenoid control system with reduced hold current |
9435459, | Jun 05 2009 | BAXTER HEALTHCARE S A | Solenoid pinch valve apparatus and method for medical fluid applications having reduced noise production |
9782577, | Jun 05 2009 | Baxter International Inc.; Baxter Healthcare S.A. | Solenoid pinch valve apparatus and method for medical fluid applications having reduced noise production |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3097353, | |||
3243665, | |||
3586983, | |||
3665901, | |||
3874255, | |||
3881453, | |||
3953741, | Dec 17 1971 | Stata-Control System SCS AG | Stepwise control for two-step control with switching stages |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Nov 03 1977 | Regie Nationale des Usines Renault | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 30 1982 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 30 1983 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 30 1983 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 30 1985 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 30 1986 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 30 1987 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 30 1987 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 30 1989 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 30 1990 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 30 1991 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 30 1991 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 30 1993 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |