An improved low cost photovoltaic cell including a sodium containing glass substrate which has been chemically treated to remove sodium ions from a surface selected for deposition of a transparent conductor.

Patent
   4510344
Priority
Dec 19 1983
Filed
Dec 19 1983
Issued
Apr 09 1985
Expiry
Dec 19 2003
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
37
8
EXPIRED
1. In a photovoltaic solar cell of the type including a glass substrate, a tin oxide transparent conductor deposited on said substrate, a thin film semiconductor layer deposited on said transparent conductor, and a second conductor deposited on said semiconductor layer, the improvement comprising:
said glass substrate containing a substantial percentage of sodium oxide, which substrate has been chemically treated, on at least the surface selected to support the transparent conductor, to:
(a) replace sodium ions with potassium ions to a depth of about 100 microns and
(b) thereafter, remove any remaining sodium ions from said surface to a depth of at least about 0.1 micron.
2. A thin film photovoltaic cell comprising:
a transparent sodium containing glass substrate having at least a first major surface which has been first chemically treated to replace sodium ions with potassium ions to a depth of about 100 microns and thereafter chemically treated to remove any remaining sodium ions from said first major surface to a depth of at least about 0.1 micron,
a thin film of transparent conductor deposited on said first major surface, said transparent conductor consisting primarily of tin oxide,
a layer of semiconductor material, including an active junction, deposited on said transparent conductor; and
a back conductor deposited on the semiconductor material.

This invention relates to thin film solar cells and more specifically to improvements in substrates for such cells which allows the use of low cost glass substrates in combination with high conductivity transparent conductors.

Considerable research and development has been directed towards development of commercially practical thin film solar cells. In such cells the semiconductor material, typically silicon, is on the order of 0.5 micron thick as compared to conventional single crystal silicon wafers having a thickness on the order of 250 microns. Thus a considerable savings in semiconductor material is achieved by use of thin film structures. Further savings are anticipated because thin film processes are usually more easily automated so that the labor costs per watt of output power should be considerably less than that required for the conventional cells.

An example of thin film solar cell structures is illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 4,292,092 issued to Hanak on Sept. 29, 1981. The Hanak structure employs a glass substrate, a transparent front conductor deposited and patterned on the glass substrate, a thin semiconductor film and a metallic back contact. The performance of such cells is quite dependent upon the sheet resistivity of the transparent conductor which forms the front contact for the active regions of the solar cell. One of the primary teachings of Hanak is a laser scribing technique used to break the sheet of semiconductor material into a series of long narrow strips which are series connected to add the voltages from the individual cells while limiting the maximum current which must be carried by the various conductors. However, scribing of the material into the individual cells results in loss of some of the active area which loss must be balanced against the power savings achieved by reduction of current levels. As the sheet resistivity of the transparent conductor is reduced, the width of the individual cells can be increased, thereby reducing inactive area resulting from scribed lines as well as reducing labor and other costs of manufacture.

U.S. Pat. No. 3,677,814 issued to Gillery on July 18, 1972 teaches a method of applying tin oxide layers to glass substrates, which methods are generally applicable to thin film solar cell processes. Gillery provides examples involving the use of soda lime glass as a substrate for formation of tin oxide transparent conductors. However Gillery also teaches that lower film resistivity can be achieved if other types of glass which can be processed at high temperatures are employed.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,146,657 issued to Gordon on Mar. 27, 1979 teaches other improvements in formation of tin oxide layers on glass, which improvements are directed towards considerable reduction in sheet resistivity of the tin oxide layers. Most of the examples provided by Gordon involve the use of Pyrex glass plate as a substrate. In example 2 Gordon notes that when a "sodium free silicon substrate" is used the sheet resistivity is about one-half that achieved with a sodium bearing substrate.

The cost of the glass substrate is a major component of the total cost of the finished product. While it is desirable to achieve the lowest sheet resistivity possible in the transparent conductive layer, the cost of high temperature glass, such as Pyrex, cannot be economically justified. While lost cost and freely available soda lime glass has proven to have quite acceptable mechanical characteristics from its use in conventional solar modules, its high sodium content increases transparent conductor sheet resistivity with the adverse results discussed above.

Thus it is seen that it is desirable to provide an improved low cost soda lime glass useful in thin film solar cells or to provide a method for treating such glass substrates to prevent the adverse effects sodium ions are known to have on resistivity of tin oxide layers.

Accordingly an object of the present invention is to provide an improved low cost thin film solar cell substrate comprising essentially soda lime glass.

Another object of the present invention is to provide improved methods for forming low resistivity transparent conductors on sodium containing glass substrates.

Yet another object of the present invention is to provide an improved, low cost thin film solar cell including a sodium containing glass substrate.

According to the present invention a thin film solar cell is formed on a low cost sodium containing glass substrate which has been pretreated to remove sodium ions from the surface selected for deposition of the transparent conductor layer. In a preferred form both major surfaces of the glass substrate are treated simultaneously in an antireflection layer generating etch process to remove sodium ions. In an alternate embodiment, sodium ions first are replaced with potassium ions in a chemical tempering process and the antireflection layer generating process is then used to remove potassium and any remaining sodium from the near surface.

The present invention may be better understood by reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment with reference to the accompanying single FIGURE which illustrates a basic thin film solar cell device in accordance with the present invention.

With reference now to the FIGURE there is illustrated a basic solar cell structure including the improvements of the present invention. The basic mechanical support for the device is provided by a glass substrate 10 formed from conventional soda lime glass about two millimeters thick. Thin layers 12 and 14 have been chemically treated as indicated by the stippling shown on the drawing. Details of the chemical treatment are discussed in more detail below. On a surface 16 of glass substrate 10 there is formed a transparent conductive layer 18. Layer 18 is typically 0.2 to 0.3 microns thick and is formed primarily of tin oxide. The tin oxide layer 18 will typically be doped with various materials such as fluorine or indium to improve conductivity as discussed in the above referenced Gillery and Gordon patents. Supported on transparent conductor 18 is a thin film semiconductor layer 20 containing a p-n junction and forming the active portion of the solar cell. Layer 20 is typically formed from silicon and may be from 0.4 to 0.5 microns thick. Layer 20 may be deposited as three distinct layers, that is a p layer, an i layer, and an n layer as discussed in the above referenced Hanak patent. However other active region structures may be employed in the present invention. A back conductor 22 is formed on the semiconductor layer 20 and may be formed from any type of high conductivity metal. For example, layer 22 may be formed by a vacuum evaporation or sputtering of aluminum to a thickness of about 0.1 micron onto the top surface of the active layer 20. External leads 24 and 26 are provided to connect the front face and back face contacts 18 and 22, respectively, to an external circuit for utilization of power generated by the semiconductor layer 20.

In the present invention improved performance is achieved by increasing the conductivity of transparent conductor 18 while costs are reduced by using a low cost soda lime glass substrate 10. We have found that this is possible by use of a glass substrate 10 which has been properly pretreated to remove sodium ions from the layer 12 on which transparent conductor 18 is deposited as illustrated in the drawing. Layer 12 is typically at least about 0.1 microns thick. In most cases the thickness of layer 12 will actually be determined by the thickness of layer 14 which will normally be formed in the same process step. Layer 14 thickness will be selected for optimum antireflection effect. Sodium ions may be removed from layers 12 and 14 by various well known processes. U.S. Pat. No. 2,486,431, issued to F. H. Nicoll et al, on Nov. 1, 1949, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,490,662 issued to S. M. Thompsen on Dec. 6, 1949 teach the use of fluosilicic acid supersaturated with silica for removing sodium and calcium from glass surfaces and are hereby incorporated by reference for such teachings.

The same or similar sodium ion removal processes are commercially available for providing an antireflective surface on glass such as that used in the preferred embodiments. Thus for example the layer 14 illustrated in the FIGURE is desirably treated in the same manner as layer 12 but for a different purpose. That is, by reducing light reflections at the surface 28, which is the light receiving face of the finished device, more power will be produced by the finished solar cell. In practice it is actually more expensive to treat only one surface, for example surface 16, that it is to treat both surfaces simultaneously. Treatment of only one surface would require an additional step to provide a protective coating to the opposite layer during the treatment process, thereby increasing the costs.

In applications where substrate 10 is the major mechanical support for the finished photovoltaic device, it is desirable that it have the maximum mechanical strength achievable. Tempered glass is quite desirable for this application. In a known chemical tempering process for such glass, the sodium ions are replaced by potassium ions. For maximum strength, this process should be applied to both layers 12 and 14 to a depth of about 100 microns. As with the sodium removal step it is, in practice, less expensive to perform the tempering process on both surfaces simultaneously rather than to attempt to treat only one surface. Commercially available ion exchange strengthening processes are carried out in molten salt baths. One method involves lowering the surface coefficient of thermal expansion, by ion exchange, while glass is at an elevated temperature, usually above the strain point. Another strengthening mechanism relies on replacement of small ions by larger ions and is carried out below the strain point. In either case, surface compression is achieved and strengthens the glass. In this embodiment, the chemical tempering process will be performed before the ion removing etch process discussed above. The etch process will then be used to remove any remaining sodium ions as well as the potassium ions from the near surface portion of the glass, that is to a depth of about 0.1 micron.

While the present invention has been illustrated and described with respect to particular structures and methods of construction, it is apparent that various modifications and changes can be made therein within the scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.

Berman, Elliot

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10059622, May 07 2012 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Anti-reflection glass with tin oxide nanoparticles
10358374, Nov 30 2009 Corning Incorporated Methods for laser scribing and separating glass substrates
4571446, May 25 1983 Semiconductor Energy Co., Ltd. Photoelectric conversion panel and assembly thereof
4625070, Aug 30 1985 SIEMENS SOLAR INDUSTRIES, L P Laminated thin film solar module
4654467, May 25 1983 Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. Photoelectric conversion panel and assembly thereof
4659867, May 25 1983 Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. Photoelectric conversion panel and assembly thereof
4758527, Aug 24 1982 Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. Method of making semiconductor photo-electrically-sensitive device
5043772, May 07 1985 SEMICONDUCTOR ENERGY LABORATORY CO , LTD , 398, HASE, ATSUGI-SHI, KANAGAWA JAPAN A CORP OF JAPAN Semiconductor photo-electrically-sensitive device
5149351, May 24 1988 Asahi Glass Company Ltd. Method for making a curved solar panel for an automobile
5252140, Jul 24 1987 Asahi Glass Company Ltd Solar cell substrate and process for its production
5271082, Feb 27 1991 CSELT - Centro Studi e Laboratori Telecomunicazioni S.p.A. Method of fabricating integrated optical guides of glass
6043105, May 07 1985 Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. Method for manufacturing semiconductor sensitive devices
6503771, Aug 22 1983 Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. Semiconductor photoelectrically sensitive device
7038238, May 07 1985 Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. Semiconductor device having a non-single crystalline semiconductor layer
7557053, Mar 13 2006 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Low iron high transmission float glass for solar cell applications and method of making same
7700869, Feb 03 2005 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Solar cell low iron patterned glass and method of making same
7700870, May 05 2005 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Solar cell using low iron high transmission glass with antimony and corresponding method
7767253, Mar 09 2007 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Method of making a photovoltaic device with antireflective coating
7893350, Mar 13 2006 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Low iron transmission float glass for solar cell applications and method of making same
8114472, Jan 08 2008 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Method of making a temperable antiglare coating, and resulting products containing the same
8153282, Nov 22 2005 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Solar cell with antireflective coating with graded layer including mixture of titanium oxide and silicon oxide
8237047, May 01 2007 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Method of making a photovoltaic device or front substrate for use in same with scratch-resistant coating and resulting product
8319095, Nov 27 2007 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Method of making an antireflective silica coating, resulting product, and photovoltaic device comprising same
8445774, Jul 26 2007 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Method of making an antireflective silica coating, resulting product, and photovoltaic device comprising same
8450594, Jul 26 2007 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Method of making an antireflective silica coating, resulting product and photovoltaic device comprising same
8450600, Mar 09 2007 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Photovoltaic device with scratch-resistant coating
8541062, Sep 28 2009 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Multi-layer anti-reflective coatings and processes therefor
8617641, Nov 12 2009 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Coated article comprising colloidal silica inclusive anti-reflective coating, and method of making the same
8637762, Nov 17 2006 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC High transmission glass ground at edge portion(s) thereof for use in electronic device such as photovoltaic applications and corresponding method
8648252, Mar 13 2006 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Solar cell using low iron high transmission glass and corresponding method
8668961, Jul 31 2008 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Titania coating and method of making same
8802216, May 05 2005 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Solar cell using low iron high transmission glass with antimony and corresponding method
8994009, Sep 07 2011 Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. Photoelectric conversion device
9181455, Dec 03 2012 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Method of making hydrophobic coated article, coated article including hydrophobic coatings, and/or sol compositions for use in the same
9272949, Jul 09 2010 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Coated glass substrate with heat treatable ultraviolet blocking characteristics
9994481, Dec 03 2012 GUARDIAN GLASS, LLC Method of making hydrophobic coated article, coated article including hydrophobic coatings, and/or sol compositions for use in the same
RE33208, May 25 1983 Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co.,Ltd. Photoelectric conversion panel and assembly thereof
Patent Priority Assignee Title
2486431,
2490662,
3677814,
3880633,
3991228, Jan 27 1975 RCA Corporation Deposition of tin oxide films on glass
4146657, Nov 01 1976 Method of depositing electrically conductive, infra-red reflective, transparent coatings of stannic oxide
4292092, Jun 02 1980 Solarex Corporation Laser processing technique for fabricating series-connected and tandem junction series-connected solar cells into a solar battery
4371740, Jul 23 1980 Eastman Kodak Company Conductive elements for photovoltaic cells
////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Dec 13 1983BERMAN, ELLIOTAtlantic Richfield CompanyASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0043530382 pdf
Dec 19 1983Atlantic Richfield Company(assignment on the face of the patent)
Feb 12 1990ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, 515 SOUTH FLOWER ST , LOS ANGELES, CA 90071, A CORP OF DE ARCO SOLAR, INC , A CORP OF DE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0052680539 pdf
Feb 28 1990ARCO SOLAR, INC SIEMENS SOLAR INDUSTRIES, L P MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS EFFECTIVE ON 02 28 1990DE0056570516 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
May 05 1988M173: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, PL 97-247.
May 11 1988ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Dec 03 1991ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Dec 03 1991RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned.
Sep 30 1992M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Nov 12 1996REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Apr 06 1997EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Apr 09 19884 years fee payment window open
Oct 09 19886 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 09 1989patent expiry (for year 4)
Apr 09 19912 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Apr 09 19928 years fee payment window open
Oct 09 19926 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 09 1993patent expiry (for year 8)
Apr 09 19952 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Apr 09 199612 years fee payment window open
Oct 09 19966 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 09 1997patent expiry (for year 12)
Apr 09 19992 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)