An apparatus is disclosed for testing easy-open can ends. The apparatus orients the ends, opens the ends, tests the ends to assure that opening has occurred and separates defective ends which have not successfully opened from acceptable ends.
|
1. Apparatus for testing sequentially a plurality of non-detachable easy-open beverage can ends for proper opening thereof comprising an entry station for said ends, a station for optically orienting said ends into a proper position for opening, a station for opening said ends and subsequently optically testing said ends for proper opening thereof, means for opening and closing said stations and means for transporting said ends through said stations.
2. The apparatus of
3. The apparatus of
4. The apparatus of
5. The apparatus of
6. The apparatus of
7. The apparatus of
8. The apparatus of
9. The apparatus of
10. The apparatus of
11. The apparatus of
12. The apparatus of
13. The apparatus of
14. The apparatus of
15. The apparatus of
16. The apparatus of
17. The apparatus of
18. The apparatus of
19. The apparatus of
20. The apparatus of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 808,552 filed Dec. 13, 1985, now abandoned.
Non-detachable easy-open metallic can ends are routinely employed in the packaging of beer and soft drinks in metallic cans. In order that quality be maintained, samples of ends are removed during production and tested to assure that these ends operate satisfactorily. Thus, for example, a sample about four ends for every package or "sleeve" of approximately 408 ends is tested.
Traditionally, the testing of these ends was accomplished manually. A quality control person would hold the end in one hand while lifting the tab with the other end, checking to see that the end opened satisfactorily. This test did not, however, always produce consistent results. Differences in the amount of force applied by different operators, or by even the same operator to different ends, uneven handling of the ends, such as pulling on the tab at an angle other than perpendicular to the tab, and other like differing handling characteristics could result in ends being considered unsatisfactorily opened when, in fact, the ends were fully satisfactory or in ends that were considered satisfactorily opening which, under normal circumstances, would not have opened properly. There is, therefore, a need for automating the testing of can ends so that each end is given equal treatment and consistent test results are obtained.
By means of the present invention, the desired goal of consistent testing of non-detachable easy-open can ends has been obtained. The present invention comprises an apparatus which orients the ends, opens the ends, tests the ends for satisfactory opening and isolates unacceptable ends found during the testing operation. The apparatus is capable of testing ends without operator interference and with consistency.
The can end tester of the present invention will be more fully described with reference to the drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a side elevational view of the can end tester of the present invention, illustrating the various stations of the apparatus;
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view taken along line 2--2 of FIG. 1, illustrating the test station; and
FIG. 3 is a front elevational view of the exit chute which is employed to separate satisfactory and unsatisfactory ends.
The can end tester 1 of the present invention is illustrated in side elevational view in FIG. 1. The tester 1 includes an entry station 2, an orienting station 3, an opening and testing station 4, a holding station 5 and an exit chute 72. The stations 2, 3, 4 and 5 comprise upper die portions which are fixedly mounted on an upper frame member 11 and lower die portions which are mounted for vertical oscillation on lower frame member 7. Lower frame member 7 oscillates vertically along side posts 9 through bushings 8. Vertical oscillation of lower frame member 7 is accomplished through means of an air cylinder 6 which is fixedly mounted to bottom frame member 13.
At each of the stations 2, 3, 4 and 5, separate activities take place. The activities of each station will now be more fully described.
Can ends enter the tester 1 through a traditional entry chute 10 formed by a plurality of rail-like members 11. A sensor 12, such as a fiber optic sensor, assures presence of ends in entry chute 10 and to entry station 2.
Ends are conveyed from station to station by means of feed bars 14. When the lower frame member 7 is in its downward-most position, the ends rest on feed bars 14. An air cylinder 16, which is controlled by solenoid valve 31 receiving input from input lines 38 and 40, actuates piston 18, moving piston 18 toward the tester stations and, through connector 20, moving feed bars 14 through the stations.
At infeed station 2, stripper knives 13, as are common in the can end conveying art, strip individual ends from the stack of ends formed by infeed 10 and move a single end to orienting station 3. At the same time, single ends are moved from station 3 to station 4, from station 4 to station 5 and from station 5 to exit chute 72, unless, of course, there are not yet ends at one or more of these stations.
Once the ends have been moved from one station to the next, air cylinder 6, which is controlled by solenoid valve 32 receiving input from lines 34 and 36, moves piston 42 upwardly, raising lower frame member 7 and closing the die stations. Once the ends have been lifted off of feed bars 14 by the lower die members of the stations, solenoid valve 31 acts to reverse air cylinder 16, moving piston 18 away from the die stations and, accordingly, pulling feed bars 14 back to the position as shown in FIG. 1.
Easy-open can ends include a finger-operable tab attached to the end and an openable panel defined by a scoreline in the end which is opened by the tab. As the ends are received at station 2 from infeed 10, these tabs are randomly positioned. However, in order to properly open and test the ends, they must be oriented identically. Station 3 accomplishes this orienting function.
After an end arrives at station 3, lower frame member 7 is again raised by air cylinder 6. The end is lifted off of feed bars 14 by die 24. Die 24 is rotably mounted by means of shaft 25 connected to motor 26. A pair of sensors 28 mounted on upper frame member 11 by means of bracket 30 look at the end. The sensors 28 may be, for example, fiber optic sensors. Each sensor looks for an edge of the tab. The end is rotated, along with die 24, by motor 26 until each of the sensors 28 sees a tab edge, when a signal is given through lines 32 to stop motor 26. At this point, the end is oriented such that the tab of the end is, as seen in FIG. 1, to the left and the panel is to the right, and its axis is along the axis of feed bar 14. At this point, lower frame member 7 is again lowered and the end returned to feed bars 14 for feeding to the next station 4.
Station 4 is the opening and testing station. It is shown in side view in FIG. 1 and in end view in cross-sectional view 2--2 of FIG. 2. Station 4 includes upper die member 46 and lower die member 52.
As lower frame member 7 is again raised, the end is captured by lower die member 52 and held firmly between lower die member 52 and upper supporting member 48 of upper die 46. At this point, air cylinder 62, which is controlled by solenoid valve 68 receiving input signals from lines 67 and 69, pulls piston 60 toward it. Attached to piston 60 is a cam 56 mounted upon mounting means 57 and 58 for vertical sliding movement and held between brackets 63 and 65 for reciprocating horizontal movement. Attached to bracket 54 is finger 50. As piston 60 moves toward air cylinder 62, cam follower 56 follows the path of cam 57. This action is also followed by finger 50. Finger 50 is initially positioned adjacent the rearward end of the tab of the can end. As finger 50 moves toward the front of the end and upwardly, finger 50 provides opening force to the end by pulling on the tab of the end. Due to the ability to control air cylinder 62, consistent force application by finger 50 can be assured, thus eliminating human error in the testing of the can ends.
Once finger 50 has completed its opening action, transmitter 55 is activated. When the tab of the end is pulled upwardly, the opening panel of the end should move downwardly, if the end is successfully opened. The panel of a property opened end will block the signal from transmitter 55, which may be, for example, a visual signal, such as a light signal, so that no signal is received by receiver 59. Should receiver 59 receive a signal from transmitter 55, the end has not opened properly. Should this occur, any of numerous actions may be initiated by receiver 59. For example, receiver 59 could initiate an audible alarm, a light and/or a counter to determine the number of improperly opened ends. At this point, lower frame member 7 is again lowered, and the end is transferred to holding station 5 by feed bars 14.
Holding station 5 is not a required station. It is merely a holding station for the ends prior to their exit through exit chute 72. The station does permit, however, other actions to be implemented by the apparatus of the present invention, should a future need arise. At station 5, the end is held by die member 70 until a final reciprocation of feed bars 14 direct the end to exit chute 72.
Looking at FIG. 3, exit chute 72 includes a pair of rail members 90 and 92 therein. As the ends exit feed bars 14 and enter chute 72, properly opened ends, as previously mentioned, will have an opening panel protruding beneath them. This protruding panel passes between rails 90 and 92, guiding the end to a recovery bin (not shown). If, however, the end was not properly opened, the opening panel will not protrude therebeneath, will not be held by rails 90 and 92 and will fall generally vertically downwardly to a separate storage (not shown) where these ends are isolated so that they can be more further studied.
Frame members 80 and 82 limit the vertical recriprocation of lower frame member 7, so that jamming of the apparatus will not occur. Finally, solenoid valve 84, receiving its input from lines 83 and 85, is a master solenoid control, which may act as an overall shutoff for the system.
From the foregoing, it is clear that the present invention provides a simple, yet effective means for consistently opening and testing can ends. While the invention has been described with reference to a certain specific embodiment thereof, it is not intended to be so limited thereby, except as set forth in the accompanying claims.
Jackson, John M., Gilliam, Edward C., Lamie, Billy J.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 4850230, | Sep 19 1988 | COORS GLOBAL PROPERTIES, INC | Pull tab force measuring apparatus |
| 5086653, | Mar 22 1991 | Ball Corporation | Can end testing |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 1694828, | |||
| 2321331, | |||
| 2411991, | |||
| 2749744, | |||
| 2803343, | |||
| 2905318, | |||
| 3261465, | |||
| 3415350, | |||
| 3559471, | |||
| 3688567, | |||
| 3700101, | |||
| 3941070, | Apr 09 1975 | The Stolle Corporation | Product transfer system |
| 4016968, | Sep 05 1975 | The Continental Group, Inc. | Method and apparatus for orienting can ends |
| 4044891, | Jan 12 1976 | DUN-Rite Erectors, Inc. | Can testing conveyor |
| 4107541, | Mar 04 1977 | Workpiece hole presence and absence inspector | |
| 4110493, | Oct 06 1975 | Gerber Products Company | System and method for coating container seams |
| 4315688, | Aug 08 1979 | GREAT LAKES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LTD | Electro-optical sensor systems for thread and hole inspection |
| 4390098, | Nov 06 1980 | Ball Corporation | Automatic closure reject from upstacking device |
| 4495797, | Jun 27 1983 | Reynolds Metals Company | Can end tester |
| 4497409, | Dec 27 1982 | Seam inspection apparatus | |
| 4511044, | Feb 24 1982 | The West Company | Seal force monitor apparatus, system, and method for in-process determination of integrity of sealed containers |
| 4519489, | Jun 27 1983 | Reynolds Metals Company | Can end sampler |
| JP47902, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Aug 14 1986 | Reynolds Metals Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Aug 21 1990 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
| Jan 20 1991 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Jan 20 1990 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Jul 20 1990 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Jan 20 1991 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Jan 20 1993 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Jan 20 1994 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Jul 20 1994 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Jan 20 1995 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Jan 20 1997 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Jan 20 1998 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Jul 20 1998 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Jan 20 1999 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Jan 20 2001 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |