An optical device comprising a transparent plate having planar first reflecting surface and second reflecting surface, a reflector and a screen for forming interference fringes thereon. When a beam is incident on the transparent plate, a portion of the beam is reflected from the first reflecting surface, while the other portion of the beam enters the interior of the plate and is reflected at the second reflecting surface. The beam reflected from the first reflecting surface and further reflected from the reflector and the beam reflected at the second reflecting surface are superposed on the screen to produce interference fringes. The period of the interference fringes is easily variable by rotating the reflector and the screen around the line of their intersection.
|
1. An optical device comprising a transparent plate having planar first and second reflecting surfaces for causing a beam incident on the first reflecting surface of the plate at a predetermined angle to be partially reflected as a first divided beam and partially transmitted to the second reflecting surface and reflected therefrom to the first reflecting surface, said reflected beam being partially reflected and partially transmitted by the first reflecting surface, the transmitted portion of said reflected beam being a second divided beam, a mirror for reflecting one of the first and second divided beams and a screen for superimposing the divided beam reflected from the mirror with the other divided beam so as to form interference fringes on the screen, said mirror and screen being relatively fixed in a predetermined angular relationship and being mounted for conjoint rotation so that the predetermined angular relationship of said mirror and screen is maintained as the mirror and screen are rotated.
2. An optical device as defined in
|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an optical device which is used for the production of wavelength controlled semiconductor lasers typical of which are distributed feedback lasers and distributed Bragg reflector lasers, and more particularly to an optical device which is useful for forming on the semiconductor substrate of such a laser a diffraction grating acting as a resonator.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Optical devices of this type heretofore proposed include one which employs a two-beam interference system as disclosed, for example, in N. Tsukada et al., "Grating Formation on Gallium Arsenide by One-step Laser-photochemical Etching" (IEE Conf. Publ. (Inst. Electr. Eng.) No. 227, 1983). With reference to FIG. 2 showing the two-beam interference system, a monochromatic coherent laser beam 1 of highly parallel rays, for example, from a He-Cd laser is divided by a beam splitter 2 into two beams 1-a and 1-b, which are reflected at mirrors 3-1 and 3-2, respectively, and then made coincident on the surface of a screen 4 again at a predetermined angle to produce on the screen 4 interference fringes in the form of periodic vertical stripes. The period P of the interference fringes is given by:
P=λ/2 sin (θ/2) (1)
wherein λ is the wavelength of the beam 1, and θ is the angle between the beams 1-a and 1-b incident on the screen 4. Thus, if the wavelength is constant, the angle θ between the beam 1-a and the beam 1-b needs to be altered in order to vary the period P of the interference fringes. With the system shown in FIG. 2, however, it is then necessary to adjust the mirrors 3-1 and 3-2, and the screen 4 at the same time. The system therefore has the drawback of making the device complex and large-sized.
The present invention provides an optical device characterized in that the device comprises a transparent plate having planar first reflecting surface and second reflecting surface for causing a beam incident on the plate at a predetermined angle to emerge therefrom as divided into two beams by reflecting a portion of the incident beam at the first reflecting surface and by reflecting the other portion of the incident beam at the second reflecting surface after allowing the beam portion to pass through the first reflecting surface and the interior of the transparent plate, a mirror for reflecting one of the two divided beams, and a screen for forming thereon interference fringes by superposing said one divided beam reflected from the mirror and the other divided beam incident on the screen from the transparent plate.
Preferably, the mirror and the screen are fixed at a specified angle with each other and are mounted on a rotary support.
Further preferably, the optical device has the following construction. The first and second reflecting surfaces of the transparent plate are arranged substantially in parallel to cause the two beams to emerge from the plate in parallel with each other, while the mirror and the screen are arranged at an angle of 90 degrees therebetween, with the line of intersection of the mirror and the screen in coincidence with the axis of rotation of the rotary support, the line of intersection being at equal distances from the center lines of the two parallel beams.
The main object of the present invention is to provide an optical device which is compact and simple in construction for producing interference fringes having a readily variable period. Thus, the present invention contemplates provision of an optical device which is very useful for fabricating distributed feedback semiconductor lasers and distributed Bragg reflector semiconductor lasers which often involve the necessity of varying the period of interference fringes.
FIG. 1 is a diagram schematically showing the construction of an embodiment of the present invention; and
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a conventional twobeam interference system for producing interference fringes.
FIG. 3 is an elevated perspective view showing the rotation of the mirror and screen.
The present invention will be described below in detail with reference to the illustrated embodiment.
Referring to FIG. 1, indicated at 5 is a coherent laser beam of highly parallel rays, e.g., a He-Cd laser beam having a wavelength of 4416 angstroms. A transparent plate 6 of fused quartz has a first reflecting surface 6-a and a second reflecting surface 6-b which are parallel with each other. The laser beam 5 is incident on the first reflecting surface 6-a at a specified angle.
The first reflecting surface 6-a of the transparent plate 6 is provided, for example, with an unillustrated multi-layer dielectric film formed by vacuum evaporation and is given a reflectivity of 38% to divide the single beam 5 into two beams, i.e., a reflected beam 5-a and a refracted beam 5-b. On the other hand, the second reflecting surface 6-b of the transparent plate 6 has, for example, an aluminum film formed by vacuum evaporation and is given a reflectivity of 100%. The plate 6 has a side surface 6-c having a multi-layer dielectric film formed by vacuum evaporation and is given a transmittance of 100%. The refracted beam 5-b divided at the first reflecting surface 6-a is totally reflected at the second reflecting surface 6b and then further divided by the first reflecting surface 6-a into a reflected beam 5-c and a refracted beam 5-d. Because the first reflecting surface 6-a is parallel with the second reflecting surface 6-b, the refracted beam 5-d is parallel with the beam 5-a. The reflected beam 5-c passes through the side surface 6-c and impinges on a power meter 7 for monitoring the output of the laser.
A mirror 8 and a screen 9 are fixedly mounted on an unillustrated rotary support. The line of intersection, O, between the mirror 8 and the screen 9 is in coincidence with the axis of rotation of the rotary support, and the distance d1 of the center line C1 of the beam 5-a from the intersection line O is equal to the distance d2 of the center line C2 of the beam 5-d from the line O. Thus, the line of intersection O is positioned at equal distances from the center lines C1 and C2. The angle between the mirror 8 and the screen 9 is 90 degrees. In FIG. 1, the triangle OV1 H1, the triangle V2 OH2 and the triangle V2 V1 O are therefore similar to one another. Accordingly, even if the angle of incidence of the beam 5-a on the mirror 8 is changed to any value by rotating the rotary support, the point of intersection of the center line C1 ' of the beam 5-a reflected from the mirror 8 and the center line C2 of the beam 5-d is present on the screen 9.
With the above arrangement, the beam 5 incident on the transparent plate 6 at the specified angle is divided into the two beams 5-a and 5-b by the first reflecting surface 6-a. Thus, the plate 6 serves as a beam splitter. The beam 5-b is totally reflected at the second reflecting surface 6-a and further divided into the two beams 5-d and 5-c by the first reflecting surface 6-a. Because the first reflecting surface 6-a is parallel with the second reflecting surface 6-b, the beam 5-a is parallel with the beam 5-d. The beam 5-a and the beam 5-d are equal in intensity, because the first reflecting surface is set to a reflectivity of 38%. The beam 5-a as reflected from the mirror 8 and the beam 5-d are superposed on the screen 9, forming interference fringes in the form of vertical stripes on the screen 9. The interference fringes have the highest contrast since the beams 5-a and 5-d are equal in intensity.
Assuming that the angle formed between the beam 5-a and the mirror 8 is φ, the angle θ between the two superposed beams 5-a and 5-d incident on the screen 9 is 2φ because the mirror 8 and the screen 9 are arranged to intersect each other at a right angle at the line O which is at equal distances from the center lines C1 and C2 of the two beams 5-a and 5-d. From Equation (1), therefore, the period P0 is given by:
P0 =λ/2 sin φ (2)
The relation of Equation (2) remains unchanged when the mirror 8 and the screen 9 are rotated through the same angle by rotating the rotary support. Further the beam 5-a and the beam 5-d incident on the screen 9 are superposed on the screen 9 as already described. Therefore, the period P0 is easily variable according to Equation (2) by rotating the rotary support fixedly carrying the mirror 8 and the screen 9 to alter the angle φ, as illustrated in FIG. 3.
For example, when the laser beam used has a wavelength λ of 4416 angstroms and the angle φ between the beam 5-a and the mirror 8 is 75 degrees, the interference fringes in the form of vertical stripes and produced on the screen 9 have a period P0 of 2286 angstroms as determined from Equation (2).
The present invention is not limited to the foregoing embodiment but can be altered without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, the transparent plate need not be a flat plate having precisely parallel surfaces, while the mirror 8 and the screen 9 need not intersect each other precisely at a right angle. Such relationship can be altered within the scope of the invention insofar as no problem is encountered in actual use.
Because of the foregoing construction, the optical device of the present invention is compact, simple, inexpensive and yet capable of producing interference fringes having a readily variable period.
Yoshida, Toshihiko, Takiguchi, Haruhisa, Kaneiwa, Shinji
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
1792766, | |||
2687670, | |||
3695749, | |||
4093338, | Jan 12 1976 | Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated | Apparatus for piecewise generation of grating-like patterns |
DE444673, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Aug 29 1985 | YOSHIDA, TOSHIHIKO | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004455 | /0608 | |
Aug 29 1985 | TAKIGUCHI, HARUHISA | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004455 | /0608 | |
Aug 29 1985 | KANEIWA, SHINJI | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 004455 | /0608 | |
Sep 09 1985 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 25 1992 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 28 1995 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Sep 20 1996 | M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 25 2000 | M185: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 11 1992 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 11 1992 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 11 1993 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 11 1995 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 11 1996 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 11 1996 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 11 1997 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 11 1999 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 11 2000 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 11 2000 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 11 2001 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 11 2003 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |