A hypereutectic aluminum silicon alloy having an improved distribution of primary silicon in the microstructure. The alloy is composed by weight of 20% to 30% silicon, 0.4% to 1.6% magnesium, up to 1.4% iron, up to 0.3% manganese, 0.25% copper maximum and the balance aluminum. With this composition the aluminum silicon alloy system exhibits near zero shrinkage on solidification, a similarity of the liquid aluminum-silicon alloy and the primary silicon during the early stages of primary silicon precipitation, and thereby minimizes floatation of the precipitated primary silicon and to provide a more uniform distribution of the primary silicon in the microstructure and increase the wear resistant characteristics of the alloy.

Patent
   4969428
Priority
Apr 14 1989
Filed
Apr 14 1989
Issued
Nov 13 1990
Expiry
Apr 14 2009
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
26
15
all paid
5. A cast component for a marine engine, comprising a casting consisting essentially by weight of 20% to 30% of silicon, 0.4% to 1.6% of magnesium, less than 0.25% copper and the balance aluminum, said alloy having a substantially uniform distribution of primary silicon particles in the microstructure of the cast component.
1. A hypereutectic aluminum silicon casting alloy consisting essentially by weight of 20% to 30% of silicon, 0.4% to 1.6% of magnesium, less than 0.25% copper and the balance aluminum, said alloy having a substantially uniform distribution of primary silicon in the microstructure of the cast alloy and said alloy having a coefficient of variation of primary silicon volume fraction of less than 40%.
7. A hypereutectic aluminum silicon casting alloy consisting essentially by weight of 25% to 28% silicon, 0.8 to 1.3% magnesium, less than 0.2% iron, less than 0.3% manganese, less than 0.2% copper and the balance aluminum, said alloy containing precipitated primary silicon crystals, the density of said silicon crystals being substantially similar to the density of the liquid-aluminum-silicon alloy during early stages of precipitation of said crystals to minimize flotation of the silicon particles and provide a more uniform distribution of primary silicon in the cast alloy.
2. The alloy of claim 1, wherein the silicon is present in the amount of 25% to 28% by weight.
3. The alloy of claim 1, and also containing by weight up to 1.4% iron and up to 0.3% manganese.
4. The alloy of claim 2 and characterized by having a substantially zero shrinkage rate on solidification.
6. The component of claim 5, wherein said component comprises an engine block having a plurality of cylinder bores, said engine block having said primary silicon particles substantially uniformly distributed throughout said block and including the area bordering said bores.

In the past aluminum alloys, due to their light weight, have been used for engine blocks for internal combustion engines. To provide the necessary wear resistance for the cylinder bores, it has been customary to chromium plate the cylinder bores, or alternately, to use cast iron liners in the bores. It is difficult to uniformly plate the bores, and as a result, plating is an expensive operation. The use of cast iron liners increases the overall cost of the engine block as well as the weight of the engine.

Hypereutectic aluminum silicon alloys containing from about 16% to 19% by weight of silicon possess good wear resistant properties achieved by the precipitated primary silicon crystals. The conventional aluminum silicon alloy usually contains a substantial amount of copper, generally in the range of 4.0% to 5.0%. Because of the high proportion of copper, the alloy has a relatively wide solidification temperature range in the neighborhood of about 250° F. to 300° F. which severely detracts from the castability of the alloy. The copper also reduces the corrosion resistance of the alloy in salt water environments and thus prevents its use for marine engines.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,603,665 describes an improved hypereutectic aluminum silicon casting alloy having particular use in casting engine blocks, or other components, for marine engines. The alloy of that patent contains by weight from 16% to 19% silicon, up to 1.4% iron, 0.4% to 0.7% magnesium, up to 0.3% manganese, less than 0.37% copper and the balance aluminum. As the copper content is minimized, the aluminum-silicon-copper eutectic is correspondingly eliminated, with the result that the alloy has a relatively narrow solidification range less than 150° F.

Normally the solid phase in a "liquid plus solid" field has either a lower or higher density, but almost never the same density, as the liquid. If the solid phase is less dense than the liquid phase, floatation of the solid phase will result. On the other hand, if the solid phase is more dense, settling of the solid phase will occur. In either case, an increased or widened solidification range will increase the time period for solidification and accentuate the phase separation. With an aluminum silicon alloy the floatation condition prevails and the alloy solidifies with a large mushy zone because of its high thermal conductivity and the absence of the skin formation typical of steel castings. This leads to liquid feeding problems at the micron level during solidification and can also result in significant amounts of microporosity.

When casting large components, such as engine blocks, floatation of primary silicon into the risers of sand castings results in a non-uniform distribution of primary silicon and therefore detracts from the wear resistance of the alloy. For yet unknown reasons, there is a non-uniform distribution of primary silicon in die cast engine blocks.

It is recognized that increasing the silicon content beyond the 16% to 19% range correspondingly widens the solidification range, and as a widening of the solidification range would normally be expected to increase the floatation and contribute to non-uniformity of primary silicon, alloys of higher silicon content have not been candidates for casting engine blocks or engine components.

The invention is directed to a hypereutectic aluminum silicon alloy containing in excess of 20% by weight of silicon and having an improved distribution of primary silicon in the microstructure.

In general the alloy contains by weight from 20% to 30% of silicon, and preferably from 25% to 28%, 0.5% to 1.3% magnesium, up to 1.4% iron, up to 0.3% manganese, 0.25% copper maximum and the balance aluminum.

Most metals, including aluminum, exhibit a volume increase during the solid-liquid phase transition, i.e. melting, and correspondingly exhibit a volume decrease on solidification. Silicon, on the other hand, acts oppositely and exhibits the largest known volume decrease on melting.

It has been discovered that with the alloy of the invention utilizing 20% to 30% by weight of silicon, the shrinkage of the aluminum on solidification tends to be balanced by the expansion of the silicon on solidification, so that the aluminum-silicon alloy system exhibits near zero shrinkage. This near zero shrinkage, and the similarity of the densities of the liquid aluminum-silicon alloy and the primary silicon during the early stages of primary silicon precipitation are believed to minimize floatation and result in a more uniform distribution of the primary silicon in the microstructure of the cast alloy.

Due to the high silicon content along with the uniform distribution of the primary silicon in the microstructure, improved wear resistance is achieved, making the alloy particularly suitable for use as engine components, such as engine blocks.

As the copper content is maintained at a minimum, the alloy has improved resistance to salt water corrosion, so that it is particularly useful for casting blocks and other components for marine engines. With the elimination of the functional need for copper, the alloy's age hardening response is obtained with magnesium, an element that does not adversely affect the corrosion-resistance.

The hypereutectic aluminum silicon casting alloy of the invention has the follow general composition in weight percent:

______________________________________
Silicon 20% to 30%
Magnesium 0.4% to 1.6%
Iron Up to 1.4%
Maganese Up to 0.3%
Copper Up to 0.25%
Aluminum Balance.
______________________________________

The alloy has the following preferred composition in weight percent:

______________________________________
Silicon 25% to 28%
Magnesium 0.8% to 1.3%
Iron Up to 1.0%
(For die casting and permanent mold
applications)
Iron Up to 0.2%
(For premium strength alloys)
Manganese Up to 0.3%
Copper Up to 0.2%
Aluminum Balance.
______________________________________

Iron is virtually insoluble in the alloy and occurs as an intermediate compound. If the iron is less than 0.6%, the compound occurs as small needles and plates in the eutectic; at higher values it occurs in a massive form and causes brittleness. Die casting and permanent mold casting use the higher concentration of iron to prevent soldering of the aluminum alloy to the steel dies. Manganese presented as an impurity, or as an alloying element, combines with the silicon and iron to form a constituent, which is tough rather than brittle and therefore tends to reduce the deleterious effect of high iron.

It has been recognized that by increasing the silicon content in a hypereutectic aluminum silicon alloy, the solidification temperature range is correspondingly increased or widened. It has been further recognized that an increased solidification range contributes to phase separation either by floatation, if the solid phase is less dense then the liquid phase as in an aluminum silicon alloy, or by settling if the solid phase is more dense than the liquid phase. Phase separation caused by floatation will result in a less uniform distribution of the primary silicon in the solidified alloy which will detract from the desired wear resistance of the alloy even though the increased silicon content would normally be expected to increase the hardness.

The invention is based on the discovery that there is a specific relationship between the silicon and aluminum contents which results in a similarity in densities of the liquid aluminum-silicon alloy and the primary silicon, and a near zero shrinkage on solidification, thus minimizing floatation of the primary silicon and resulting in a more uniform distribution of primary silicon in the microstructure.

Most pure metals exhibit a volume increase of about 4% during melting or during the solid-liquid phase transition, and conversely exhibit a volume decrease on solidification. The volume change on melting for aluminum is somewhat higher, showing an increase in volume of about 6.9%. Silicon, on the other hand, acts oppositely during the solid-liquid phase transition and exhibits the largest known volume decrease on melting, a decrease of about 9.5%. It is believed that for silicon, the rigid and directional bonds of the solid are apparently broken on melting and the atoms thus behave in a more spherical manner and pack closely together.

As aluminum and silicon exhibit opposite volume changes on melting and solidification, it has been found that a composition exists in the aluminum silicon alloy system that will exhibit near zero shrinkage on solidification. It has been discovered that above the eutectic composition, the shrinkage of aluminum-silicon alloys decreases linearly with increasing silicon content, arriving at a near zero shrinkage at a 25% to 28% silicon content. As the liquids temperature increases with increasing silicon content, the density of the liquid aluminum-silicon decreases, both because of the composition change and the temperature change. While the density of the liquid is changing both due to composition and temperature, the density of the pure silicon phase does not change to the same degree because the composition is fixed at 100% silicon and because the phase is solid and more resistant to change, due to temperature, than the liquid. Since silicon phase embryos do not rise through the melt as rapidly, due to the similarity of densities of the solid and liquid phase, it is believed that primary phase growth is inhibited and contributes to more nucleation which results in a smaller sized primary that, of course, floats out of the melt more slowly. It is believed that this near zero shrinkage and the density similarity of the liquid and solid phases during the early stages of solidification are the primary reasons for the improved uniformity of distribution of primary silicon in the microstructure of the alloy.

If the silicon content is below 20% by weight a minimal affect is achieved on floatation and little improvement is shown in the distribution of primary silicon in the microstructure. If the silicon content is increased beyond approximately 30% by weight, the agglomeration of silicon becomes objectionable, the machinability becomes increasingly more difficult, and the ductility decreases. Thus, there is a practical limit for usefulness of an alloy having more than 30% silicon.

The following table illustrates the improvement in distribution of primary silicon achieved through the alloy of the invention. The uniformity of primary silicon is measured with the values obtained for the coefficient of variation of the silicon volume fraction. This is determined by measuring individual cross-sections 5.86 mm2 with at least 25 fields of view being measured. The measurement is done with a microscope interfaced to a computer for quantitative analysis with the field of view magnified 50× and containing, on average, at least 50 primary silicon particles in each field of view.

Using this method, a comparison was made between a hypereutectic aluminum silicon alloy containing 17.0% silicon, 0.2% manganese, 0.1% iron, 0.6% magnesium, 0.15% copper and the balance aluminum and an alloy of the invention containing 25% by weight of silicon, 0.1% iron, 0.1% manganese, 0.8% magnesium, 0.14% copper and the balance aluminum.

The results of the comparison are shown in the following table for two properly phosphorous modified alloys cast under identical casting conditions into evaporable polymeric foam backed up with sand.

TABLE 1
______________________________________
Coefficient of Variation
Alloy Silicon Volume Fraction
______________________________________
1. 17% silicon 47.1%
2. 25% silicon 34.5%
______________________________________

The above comparison shows that the coefficient of variation of the silicon volume fraction was reduced from 47.1% with a 17% silicon alloy to 34.5% with the 25% silicon alloy of the invention, thus the primary silicon phase distribution is 36.5% more uniform for the 25% silicon alloy than for the 17% silicon alloy. In general, the alloy exhibits a coefficient of variation less than 40%.

In the alloy of the invention, the copper content is maintained below 0.25% and preferably at a minimum. By minimizing the copper content, the corrosion resistance of the alloy to salt water environments is greatly improved, making the alloy particularly useful for engine blocks for marine engines and other components requiring strength, wear resistance, and corrosion resistance.

The magnesium allows the alloy to obtain age hardening properties. In general, the heat treatment consists of heating the alloy to a solution temperature in the range of about 950° to 1010° F., and preferably 1000° F., quenching the alloy in boiling water, and then aging at a temperature in the range of 300° F. to 350° F. and preferably about 310° F. for a period of 3 to 6 hours. With this heat treatment the ultimate tensile strength can be raised from about 13,600 psi, in the as cast condition, to about 23,000 psi in the heat treated condition. Designing a higher tensile strength in an alloy with limited ductility, such as a high silicon hypereutectic aluminum-silicon alloy, requires the elastic strain capability to be built into the copper-free matrix of the alloy since stress is proportional to strain. Copper dissolved in the matrix of hypereutectic alloys decreases the elastic strain capability. The alloy in both the as cast and heat treated condition has an elongation in two inches of 0.2 %.

In addition to the improved uniformity of the primary silicon distribution, the alloy is capable of withstanding a larger fracture strain in the matrix due to the minimum copper content. The modulus of silicon is greater than that of aluminum and thus in the aluminum-silicon composite, the silicon will carry a greater fraction of the load since the aluminum-silicon matrix and the silicon particles are under equal strain during tensile or compression loading. The load carrying limitation of the alloy composite is the fracture strain limit that the matrix can sustain.

Due to the high silicon content, the solidification range of the alloy of the invention is in the range of about 250° F. to 300° F., which is greater than that of the alloy described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,603,665. But because of the near zero shrinkage rate of the alloy system and the similarity of the densities of the liquid aluminum-silicon and the primary silicon during the early stages of primary silicon precipitation, the increased solidification range does not correspondingly increase the non-uniformity of distribution of primary silicon, as would be expected.

Due to the uniform distribution of silicon particles in the microstructure, the minimum copper content and specific magnesium composition range, the alloy of the invention has particular use in casting engine blocks for marine engines. Because of the excellent wear resistance, the necessity of plating the cylinder bores or using cast iron liners is eliminated.

Various modes of carrying out the invention are contemplated as being within the scope of the following claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which is regarded as the invention.

Cleary, Terrance M., Donahue, Raymond J., Hesterberg, William G.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10370742, Mar 14 2013 Brunswick Corporation Hypereutectic aluminum-silicon cast alloys having unique microstructure
10633724, Sep 06 2013 Arconic Technologies LLC Aluminum alloy products and methods for producing same
5129378, Sep 27 1991 Brunswick Corporation Two-cycle marine engine having aluminum-silicon alloy block and iron plated pistons
5165464, Sep 27 1991 Brunswick Corporation Method of casting hypereutectic aluminum-silicon alloys using a salt core
5178686, Dec 20 1988 Metallgesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft Lightweight cast material
5234514, May 20 1991 Brunswick Corporation Hypereutectic aluminum-silicon alloy having refined primary silicon and a modified eutectic
5253625, Oct 07 1992 Brunswick Corporation Internal combustion engine having a hypereutectic aluminum-silicon block and aluminum-copper pistons
5290373, Apr 23 1993 Brunswick Corporation Evaporable foam casting system utilizing an aluminum-silicon alloy containing a high magnesium content
5303682, Oct 17 1991 Brunswick Corporation Cylinder bore liner and method of making the same
5355930, Sep 04 1992 Brunswick Corporation Method of expendable pattern casting of hypereutectic aluminum-silicon alloys using sand with specific thermal properties
5355931, Sep 04 1992 Brunswick Corporation Method of expendable pattern casting using sand with specific thermal properties
5383429, Feb 23 1994 Brunswick Corporation Hypereutectic aluminum-silicon alloy connecting rod for a two-cycle internal combustion engine
5755271, Dec 28 1995 Copeland Corporation Method for casting a scroll
5960851, Aug 04 1998 Brunswick Corporation Method of lost foam casting of aluminum-silicon alloys
6024157, Nov 21 1997 Brunswick Corporation Method of casting hypereutectic aluminum-silicon alloys using an evaporable foam pattern and pressure
6329021, Sep 11 1998 DaimlerChrysler AG Method for producing a surface coating on a substrate using a material wire
6332907, Aug 30 1997 Honsel GmbH & Co. KG Alloy for producing metal foamed bodies using a powder with nucleating additives
6531089, Aug 30 1997 Honsel GmbH & Co. KG Alloy and method for producing objects therefrom
6923935, May 02 2003 Brunswick Corporation Hypoeutectic aluminum-silicon alloy having reduced microporosity
6973954, Dec 20 2001 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT Method for manufacture of gray cast iron for crankcases and cylinder heads
7100669, Apr 09 2003 Brunswick Corporation Aluminum-silicon casting alloy having refined primary silicon due to pressure
7347905, May 02 2003 Brunswick Corporation Aluminum-silicon alloy having reduced microporosity and method for casting the same
7666353, May 02 2003 Brunswick Corp Aluminum-silicon alloy having reduced microporosity
9109271, Mar 14 2013 Brunswick Corporation Nickel containing hypereutectic aluminum-silicon sand cast alloy
9650699, Mar 14 2013 Brunswick Corporation Nickel containing hypereutectic aluminum-silicon sand cast alloys
9903007, Sep 25 2012 JOSHO GAKUEN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION Hypereutectic aluminum-silicon alloy die-cast member and process for producing same
Patent Priority Assignee Title
1947121,
2357452,
3092744,
3726672,
3881879,
4147074, Feb 05 1977 Toyota Jidosha Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Aluminum alloy rocker-arm
4297976, May 31 1978 Associated Engineering, Italy, S.p.A. Piston and cylinder assemblies
4603665, Apr 15 1985 Brunswick Corp. Hypereutectic aluminum-silicon casting alloy
GB1437144,
GB2167442,
JP31530,
JP208443,
JP208444,
JP228646,
JP5439311,
///////////////////////////////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Apr 13 1989DONAHUE, RAYMOND J BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, A CORP OF DEASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0050770910 pdf
Apr 13 1989HESTERBERG, WILLIAM G BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, A CORP OF DEASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0050770910 pdf
Apr 13 1989CLEARY, TERRANCE M BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, A CORP OF DEASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0050770910 pdf
Apr 14 1989Brunswick Corporation(assignment on the face of the patent)
Dec 19 2008Brunswick Bowling & Billiards CorporationJPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0220920365 pdf
Dec 19 2008Lund Boat CompanyJPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0220920365 pdf
Dec 19 2008LAND N SEA DISTRIBUTING, INC JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0220920365 pdf
Dec 19 2008BRUNSWICK LEISURE BOAT COMPANY, LLCJPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0220920365 pdf
Dec 19 2008BRUNSWICK FAMILY BOAT CO INC JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0220920365 pdf
Dec 19 2008BRUNSWICK COMMERCIAL & GOVERNMENT PRODUCTS, INC JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0220920365 pdf
Dec 19 2008BOSTON WHALER, INC JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0220920365 pdf
Dec 19 2008Attwood CorporationJPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0220920365 pdf
Dec 19 2008TRITON BOAT COMPANY, L P JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0220920365 pdf
Dec 19 2008Brunswick CorporationJPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0220920365 pdf
Aug 14 2009TRITON BOAT COMPANY, L P THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0231800493 pdf
Aug 14 2009Brunswick Bowling & Billiards CorporationTHE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0231800493 pdf
Aug 14 2009Lund Boat CompanyTHE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0231800493 pdf
Aug 14 2009LAND N SEA DISTRIBUTING, INC THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0231800493 pdf
Aug 14 2009BRUNSWICK LEISURE BOAT COMPANY, LLCTHE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0231800493 pdf
Aug 14 2009Brunswick CorporationTHE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0231800493 pdf
Aug 14 2009Attwood CorporationTHE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0231800493 pdf
Aug 14 2009BOSTON WHALER, INC THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0231800493 pdf
Aug 14 2009BRUNSWICK COMMERCIAL & GOVERNMENT PRODUCTS, INC THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0231800493 pdf
Aug 14 2009BRUNSWICK FAMILY BOAT CO INC THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0231800493 pdf
Mar 21 2011JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTLund Boat CompanyRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0260260001 pdf
Mar 21 2011JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTLAND N SEA DISTRIBUTING, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0260260001 pdf
Mar 21 2011JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTBRUNSWICK LEISURE BOAT COMPANY, LLCRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0260260001 pdf
Mar 21 2011JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTBRUNSWICK FAMILY BOAT CO INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0260260001 pdf
Mar 21 2011JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTBRUNSWICK COMMERICAL & GOVERNMENT PRODUCTS, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0260260001 pdf
Mar 21 2011JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTBOSTON WHALER, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0260260001 pdf
Mar 21 2011JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTAttwood CorporationRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0260260001 pdf
Mar 21 2011JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTTRITON BOAT COMPANY, L P RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0260260001 pdf
Mar 21 2011JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTBrunswick CorporationRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0260260001 pdf
Mar 21 2011JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTBrunswick Bowling & Billiards CorporationRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0260260001 pdf
Jul 17 2013The Bank of New York MellonBrunswick CorporationRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0319730242 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
May 06 1991ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Apr 27 1994M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Jun 20 1994RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned.
Apr 30 1998M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Apr 29 2002M185: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.
May 20 2002ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Nov 13 19934 years fee payment window open
May 13 19946 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Nov 13 1994patent expiry (for year 4)
Nov 13 19962 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Nov 13 19978 years fee payment window open
May 13 19986 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Nov 13 1998patent expiry (for year 8)
Nov 13 20002 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Nov 13 200112 years fee payment window open
May 13 20026 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Nov 13 2002patent expiry (for year 12)
Nov 13 20042 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)