An improved device for sampling signals to minimize the errors introduced in the stored samples includes first and second sampling elements whose respective sampling and holding periods are offset with respect to each other, an amplifier applying a gain G to the difference between the input voltage and the sample stored by the first element, before transmitting it to the second element, and a summing circuit for adding to the samples stored by the first element a fraction of the samples stored by the other element. The sampling errors are reduced by a factor G equal to the gain value.
|
4. A sampling circuit comprising:
a first sampling element for sampling an input signal and providing an output signal indicative thereof; a differential amplifier for providing a differential signal indicative of the difference between the input signal and the first sampling element output signal; a second sampling element for sampling the differential signal and providing an output signal indicative thereof; a summing amplifier for providing as the sampling circuit output the sum of the first sampling element output signal and a fraction of the second sampling element output signal.
1. An improved device for sampling an input signal with a reduced error rate, said device comprising:
a first sampling element having a determined acquisition time for sampling the device input signal; a second sampling element having the determined acquisition time; means for applying a first control signal to said first sampling element to cause said first sampling element to have alternately a first sampling period and a first holding period; means for applying a second control signal to said second sampling element to cause said second sampling element to have alternately a second sampling period and a second holding period, the second sampling period extending beyond the first sampling period by a time interval greater than the determined acquisition time; amplifying means for amplifying the difference between the device input signal and the output signal of said first sampling element; means connecting the output of said amplifying means to the input of said second sampling element; and adding means for adding to the output signal of said first sampling element a fraction of the output signal of said second sampling element, thereby reducing errors applied to signal samples by said second sampling element.
2. A device as claimed in
said amplifying means comprises a first differential amplifier; and said adding means comprises means for amplifying the output of said first and second sampling elements, the output of said second sample element being amplified less than the output of said first sampling element.
3. A device as claimed in
|
The present invention relates to an improved sampling device for minimizing errors affecting successively stored signal samples.
Acquisition of a signal by a digitization chain generally comprises the application to the input of an analog-to-digital converter of signal samples taken from the signal with a given sampling frequency and storage of each of samples during a time interval sufficient for conversion of the samples into a digital word. The signal samples are taken and stored by electronic circuits well known by specialists and designated as sample-and-hold circuits.
For different reasons related to the imperfections of the component elements of sample-and-hold circuits, the amplitudes of the stored samples are affected by errors. There may be systematic errors or dynamic errors, depending on the magnitude of the magnitude variations of the successive signal samples. In this case, it can be observed that the amplitude of a signal sample is not independent of the stored value of the preceding sample. The separating power of a sample-and-hold circuit is defined by a so-called cross-talk rate whose usual values are of the order of -80 dB. In some cases, particularly in the field of seismic prospection where precise digitization of the stored samples is carried out, the cross-talk rate between samples must be very much less than these usual values.
From French patent No. 2,453,471 (corresponding to the U.S. Pat. No. 4,352,070), a sample-and-hold circuit is known comprising a capacitor for storing electric voltage samples and means for applying the voltage to be stored to the storage capacitor during sampling periods and for isolating the storage capacitor during holding periods. This sample-and-hold circuit comprises a passive compensation circuit having a second capacitor, adapted for reproducing the real characteristics of the storage capacitor, this circuit being connected between the output of the sample-and-hold circuit and ground, means for intermittently short-circuiting the second capacitor and means for subtracting a fraction of the voltage applied to the terminals of the second capacitor from the value of the voltage applied to the storage capacitor.
This sample-and-hold circuit is particularly adapted to the compensation of faults inherent in its storage capacitor.
The device of the present invention is adapted for sampling any signal with a reduced error rate. It comprises a first sampling element to which the signal to be sampled is applied and a second sampling element whose sampling period is delayed, with respect to that of the first sampling element, by a time interval less than the acquisition time of the sampling elements, amplification means for applying an amplification gain to the difference between the amplitude of the signal at the input of the first element and of the signal at the output thereof, the output of the amplification means being connected to the input of the second element, and summation means for adding to the signal from the first element a fraction of the signal coming from the second element so as to reduce the errors applied to the signal samples by the second element.
The device of the invention greatly reduces all the faults introduced by a sample-and-hold circuit, whether the faults are due to the storage capacitor or to the electronic elements associated with this capacitor. The invention avoids the need for sample-and-hold circuits of hybrid manufacture, which are costly and which consume much electric current and thus, which are not compatible with the manufacture of complex acquisition systems in which a multiplicity of acquisition boxes including such sample-and-hold circuits are distributed along a seismic streamer of very great length.
The advantages of the invention will be better understood from the following description concerning one embodiment, given by way of non-limitative example, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 shows one known example of a sample-and-hold circuit;
FIG. 2 shows a timing diagram of the control voltage of a sample-and-hold circuit, for intermittently storing a signal to be sampled;
FIG. 3 shows the respective variations of a signal applied to the input of a sample-and-hold circuit and of the corresponding signals at the terminals of the storage capacitor thereof;
FIG. 4 shows, in an approximate way, the variation of the error introduced by a sample-and-hold circuit as a function of the difference of amplitude between two successive signal samples;
FIG. 5 shows a preferred embodiment of the device of the invention; and
FIGS. 6 and 7 shows respectively the timing diagrams of the control signals of two sample-and-hold circuits included in the device of FIG. 5.
The sample-and-hold circuit of known type illustrated in FIG. 1 comprises two operational amplifiers A and A' disposed in series, the output of the first one being connected by a switch I, preferably an electronic switch, to the non inverting input of the second amplifier A', which is also connected to ground through a capacitor C. The output impedance of the first amplifier A is small whereas the input impedance of the second is very high. The first amplifier A is an isolating amplifier with unity gain whose output signal reproduces the signal Ve applied to its non inverting input.
During a holding time interval TH ending at time t1 (FIGS. 2, 3), switch I is open. The input impedance of amplifier A' being very high, the voltage Vc on capacitor c is kept practically at a constant value VH during this so-called holding time interval. That voltage corresponds to the value of the sample taken at time t1. It is assumed that, during this holding time interval TH, the input signal Ve has decreased very rapidly because it has high variation dynamics. At time t1 and up to the subsequent time t2, a control signal VI (FIG. 2) is applied to switch I so as to close it. The time interval (t1, t2) defines a sampling period TS. The voltage Vc decreases until it reaches the input voltage Ve and follows it in its variations. But at time t2 when switch I is again opened, initiating a new rolding period TH, voltage Vc, and consequently voltage VS at the output of amplifier A 2, instead of maintaining the value Vc2 reached at the end of the sampling period TS, undergoes a sudden variation and is held at a value VH2. It can also be seen that the difference VHS between the voltages VH2 and Vc2 depends on the amplitude variation ΔV. undergone by the input signal from the preceding sampling time. In general, this variation ΔV is substantially linear (FIG. 4).
The error VHS results from several different causes. The most notable relates to the imperfections of the storage capacitor C which is equivalent to a theoretical capacitor without loss connected in parallel with a circuit comprising a resistor in series with a capacitor. The error VHS is also due to the non-linearity of the amplifying stages, such as A, or A', as well as to the defects inherent in the electronic switche I. The reduction of this error becomes necessary when an analog-to-digital converter is used with high dynamics (delivering for example 15 bit digital words). The sampling and holding assembly shown in FIG. 5 reduces very greatly the differences VHS, whether they are due to the storage capacitors or to the associated electronic elements.
The assembly of FIG. 5 comprises a first sample-and-hold circuit EB1 capable of providing, during all its holding phases, correct storage of the voltage Ve which is applied thereto. The signal at the input e of the element EB1 and the signal available at the outputs of the same element are applied respectively to the non-inverting input eni1 and to the inverting input ei1 of a differential amplifier A1 whose gain has a predetermined value G. The application of these two signals is provided through a conventional network of four electric resistors. Two of them (R1, R2), disposed in series connect the input e to ground. The middle point of resistors R1, R2 is connected to the non-inverting input eni1 of amplifier A1. The other two resistors (R3, R4), disposed in series, connect the output s to the output s1 of amplifier A1, and their middle point is connected to the inverting input ei1 of that amplifier.
The output s1 of amplifier A1 is connected to the input e2 of a second sample-and-hold circuit EB2 whose errors are to be corrected. The output of element EB1 is also connected to the inverting input ei2 of a second amplifier A2 through a resistor R. This same input ei2 is also connected to the output of element EB2 through a resistor of value GR, G being the gain of the first amplifier A1.
A control signal VI1 is applied to the control input of the first sample-and-hold circuit EB1 so as to alternately cause closure of its internal switch I (FIG. 1) at times ts1 (beginning of the sampling period) and opening of that switch I at times th1 (beginning of the storage and holding period). Similarly, a control signal VI2 is applied to the control input of the second sample-and-hold circuit EB2, so as to alternately cause closure (at time ts2) and opening (at time th2) of its internal switch I. The control signals are such that the time th2 of control signal VI2 offset in time with respect to time th1 by an interval dt greater than the acquisition time proper of each sample-and-hold circuit.
The device operates in the following way:
VeH designates the value of the input voltage Ve1 stored at any holding time th1 of the sample-and-hold circuit EB1, and VHS1 designates the amplitude of the error introduced thereby. From this time th1, the voltage applied to the inverting input ei1 of amplifier A1 is equal to (VeH +VHS1). The input voltage Ve1 is continually variable. By (VeH +u) is designated the value of Ve1 at the subsequent time th2 when holding of the sample-and-hold circuit EB2 is initiated. Since this value is then applied to the non inverting input eni1 of amplifier A1, the voltage VS1 at the output s1 thereof, amplified with a gain equal to G is:
VS1 =G[(VeH +u)-(VeH +VHS1)]
or VS1 =G(u-VHS1) (1)
The voltage VS1 is stored by the sample-and-hold circuit EB2 which applies thereto an error which is designated by VHS2.
To the inverting input ei2 of amplifier A2 are therefore applied (a) the voltage (VeH +VHS1) and (b) the voltage (VS1 +VHS2) divided in a ratio G. The voltage measurable at the output VS2 of the second amplifier A2 is therefore expressed: ##EQU1## which, by simplifying becomes ##EQU2## (VeH +u) represents the input value Ve1 at the time th2, and so, it can be seen that the final the output of the device: is only affected by an error amplitude VHS2/G which is divided in a ratio G with respect to the error which would be experienced at the output of the sample-and-hold circuit EB2 if it were used alone. This reduction affects the errors introduced whatever their cause.
The maximum value which is available to give to gain G for minimizing the error voltages as much as possible, is determined as a function of the maximum frequency of the signal Ve1 applied to the input of the device and as a function of the acquisition time τ proper to the sample-and-hold circuits, so that the voltage VS1 (equation 1) never exceeds the maximum voltage that can be stored by element EB2. The reduction of the error voltage provided by the device will be better if the frequency of sampling of the signals is not too high. This is the case, for example, for the multiplexed acquisition of the signals delivered by seismic receivers.
Without departing from the scope of the invention, a different value could be given to the product of the gain G of amplifier A1 multiplied by the factor reducing the amplitude of the samples coming from the second sample-and-hold circuit.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3641563, | |||
4004239, | Jul 20 1974 | Ferranti, Limited | Discrimination circuit for isolating disturbance signals which are superimposed on D.C. pedestals |
4352070, | Apr 06 1979 | Institut Francais du Petrole; Compagnie Generale de Geophysique | Sample-and-hold unit |
4691125, | Oct 03 1986 | Motorola, Inc. | One hundred percent duty cycle sample-and-hold circuit |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 02 1988 | Institut Francais du Petrole | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Oct 18 1990 | BEAUDUCEL, CLAUDE | Institut Francais du Petrole | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 005475 | /0064 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 24 1994 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Aug 05 1994 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Aug 04 1998 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jan 10 1999 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jan 08 1994 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jul 08 1994 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 08 1995 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jan 08 1997 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jan 08 1998 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jul 08 1998 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 08 1999 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jan 08 2001 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jan 08 2002 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jul 08 2002 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 08 2003 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jan 08 2005 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |