The operating speed of a microcreping process and the crossdeckle product uniformity can be significantly improved by tempering the primary blade at temperatures of about 850° F. or greater.
|
1. In a continuous process for softening a web wherein the web is supported on the surface of a rotating drum and lengthwise compressed in a treatment cavity defined by the surfaces of the rotating drum, a rigid primary blade which presses the web against the rotating drum, and an inclined rigid retarder blade which retards the forward movement of the web and dislodges the web from the surface of the rotating drum, the improvement comprising a high carbon steel primary blade which has been tempered at temperature of about 850° F. or greater and which has a hardness of about 45 rockwell C or greater.
2. The process of
3. The process of
|
U.S. Pat. No. 4,919,877 to Parsons et al. describes a method for softening webs commonly known as microcreping. The method described by Parsons et al. generally involves compression of the web in a cavity formed between the surface of a rotating cylinder, a retarder blade and a primary blade. While the process can be very effective in softening a web and imparting desirable properties, the speed at which the process can be operated can be a drawback from a commercial perspective. It has been found that at process speeds greater than about 1900 feet per minute caused an unacceptable variation in the quality of the creping across the deckle of the machine. Accordingly there is a need for improving the microcreping process so that higher operating speeds can be maintained while also maintaining product quality.
It has now been discovered that a cause of declining product quality at high operating speeds is the warping of the primary blade across the deckle of the machine. It is speculated that the cause of warping is a variation in localized temperatures which may reach 850° F. or greater. Even though the primary blade materials as normally purchased have already been tempered, apparently the conventional tempering treatments are insufficient for use in a high speed microcreping process. Accordingly, it has been discovered that tempering the primary blade at or above the expected high operating temperatures enables attainment of significantly higher operating speeds without loss in cross deckle product quality. At the same time, one must be careful not to over temper the primary blade to the point where the hardness of the blade is too low to maintain adequate wear longevity.
Hence the invention resides in a continuous process for softening a web wherein the web is supported on the surface of a rotating drum and lengthwise compressed in a treatment cavity defined by the surfaces of the rotating drum, a rigid primary blade which presses the web against the surface of the drum, and an inclined rigid retarder blade which retards the forward movement of the web and dislodges the web from the surface of the rotating drum, the improvement comprising a high carbon steel primary blade which has been tempered at a temperature of about 850° F. or greater and which has a hardness of about 45 Rockwell C or greater. The microcreping process for softening webs in which this invention is applicable is described in the above-mentioned Parsons et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,919,877, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The method of tempering the primary blade can be any suitable tempering method as is known in the tempering art. In essence, tempering involves a treatment in which the primary blade is subjected to a gradual increase in temperature up to the desired temperature of about 850° F. or greater followed by a decrease in temperature back to room temperature in order to modify the nature of the material of the primary blade to make it more heat resistant. The maximum tempering temperature is preferably about 1000° F. Tempering temperatures above 1000° F. tend to reduce the hardness of the primary blade to a level which adversely affects the wear resistance and longevity of the primary blade in use. For purposes herein, the maximum temperature is the highest temperature to which the primary blade is exposed for at least about 15 minutes. Exposures for shorter periods of time have a reduced effect on the tempering treatment.
A preferred tempering schedule for a primary blade of AISI 1095 spring steel is to place the primary blade in an oven and heat for one hour to 200° F. The oven temperature is increased 200° F. every hour until a final temperature of 1000° F. is reached and sustained for one hour. The primary blade is left in the oven as the oven temperature cools to room temperature, which takes about 6 hours. This heat treatment schedule can be varied in time and/or temperature to alter the characteristics of the primary blade as desired and will to some extent depend upon the steel of the primary blade. However, for this particular primary blade, the foregoing heat treatment enabled increasing the speed of the microcreping process to 3500 feet per minute or greater on a variety of basesheets without a loss in cross deckle product quality.
The type of steel used to make up the primary blade can be any high carbon steel (a steel with a carbon content greater than about 0.7 weight percent). Particular steels which are suitable include, without limitation, AISI 1075, 1078, 1080, 1084 and 1095 spring steel.
The hardness of the treated primary blades is preferably about 45 Rockwell C or greater and most preferably about 50 Rockwell C or greater. Primary blades having lower hardness values wear out too quickly to be of commercial value since it is necessary to shut the machine down to change blades. Hardness is also a function of the maximum tempering temperature, the hardness decreasing with increasing tempering temperature. Hence one must balance the desirability for high degree of hardness with the desirability for a high degree of heat stability.
The heat treatment described herein can also be applied to other microcreping hardware such as the retarder blade, back-up blades and the pressure plate to further enhance cross deckle product quality consistency and therefore speed of operation.
Ake, Todd M., Otto, Kurt T., Costello, Peter K.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5753076, | Feb 03 1997 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc | Method for creping tissue |
5849158, | Feb 03 1997 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Ion nitrided creping doctor blade |
6797226, | Oct 10 2000 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc | Process of making microcreped wipers |
7364642, | Aug 18 2003 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc | Recycling of latex-containing broke |
7815995, | Mar 03 2003 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc | Textured fabrics applied with a treatment composition |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4325758, | Oct 02 1980 | AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC , | Heat treatment for high chromium high carbon stainless steel |
4359351, | Oct 23 1979 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | Protective atmosphere process for annealing and or spheroidizing ferrous metals |
4919877, | Sep 17 1986 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc | Process for softening webs |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Mar 13 1991 | AKE, TODD M | KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, A CORP OF DE | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 005661 | /0288 | |
Mar 15 1991 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Mar 15 1991 | COSTELLO, PETER K | KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, A CORP OF DE | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 005661 | /0288 | |
Mar 15 1991 | OTTO, KURT T | KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, A CORP OF DE | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 005661 | /0288 | |
Nov 30 1996 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 008519 | /0919 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 21 1995 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
May 30 1995 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Oct 04 1999 | M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 26 2003 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 07 1995 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 07 1995 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 07 1996 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 07 1998 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 07 1999 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 07 1999 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 07 2000 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 07 2002 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 07 2003 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 07 2003 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 07 2004 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 07 2006 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |