The present invention is a light fixture having a catadioptric lens designed to discard preselected amounts of light from a light source. The percentage of the light discarded will vary over the surface of the reflector in order to provide a predetermined output intensity distribution.
|
1. A light fixture comprising:
a housing defining an optical cavity having an optical window for allowing light to escape from said optical cavity; a light source in said optical cavity for producing light; and a lens lying in said optical window for directing light from said optical cavity through said optical window, said lens having a first surface external to said optical cavity and a second surface internal to said optical cavity, said second surface being a structured surface, said structured surface having a plurality of triangular prisms formed thereon, each said prisms having a transmissive facet and a reflective facet positioned such that light from said light source will enter said lens through one of said transmissive facets, be totally internally reflected by one of said reflective facets and exit through said first surface, where each of said transmissive facets makes a first angle with said optical window and each of said reflective facets makes a second angle with a normal to said optical window, said first and second angles for each of said prisms being selected to provide preselected light intensity distribution over said optical windown, said preselected light intensity distribution being provided by discarding a preselected percentage of said light from said light source.
3. The light fixture of
6. The light fixture of
8. The light fixture of
|
A common desire in designing a lighting fixture is to provide such a fixture such that it will provide a uniform level of illumination across its entire aperture. Various techniques have been used to accomplish this. For example, one such light fixture is shown in commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. 4,791,540. The system of that patent uses specialized film in the aperture in order to ensure that the light will undergo multiple reflections before emerging. In this way the light is evenly distributed throughout the optical cavity providing a uniform intensity output.
Another technique is shown in commonly-assigned copending application Ser. No. 192,212, filed May 10, 1988. According to the technique taught therein, a Fresnel-type reflector is provided wherein some of the Fresnel structures have multiple active faces. Some of these faces are used to direct light out of the light fixture in the intended direction, while others are used to discard excess light in areas close to the light source.
According to the invention a light fixture has a housing defining an optical cavity with an optical window for allowing light to escape from the housing. The light fixture further has a light source within the optical cavity. A lens lies in said optical window and has a first surface external to the optical cavity and a second surface internal to the optical cavity. The second surface is a structured surface. The structured surface has a plurality of triangular prisms formed thereon. Each of the triangular prisms has a transmissive facet and a reflective facet, the transmissive facets making first angles with the optical window and the reflective facets making second angles with a normal to the optical window, where the first and second angles for each prism are chosen such that the light fixture will provide a preselected light intensity distribution over the optical window.
FIG. 1 is a view of a light fixture according to the invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a light fixture according to the invention;
FIG. 3 is a side view of a first portion of a lens for use in a light fixture according to the invention; and
FIG. 4 is a side view of a second portion of a lens for use in a light fixture according to the invention.
FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of the invention. In FIG. 1 a light fixture, 10, includes a housing 12 defining an optical cavity. It also includes an optical window 14 through which the light escapes. In a preferred embodiment the optical window lies in a plane. Furthermore it includes a catadioptric lens, 16, having a structured surface and lying in optical window 14. The structures are schematically shown as 18 and are typically circular and concentric. Light fixture 10 also includes a light source, 20.
FIG. 2 schematically shows the light fixture of the invention in order to define some of the symbols to be used in the subsequent description. F is the focal length of lens 16 and represents the distance between light source 20 and lens 16. R is the radial distance from the center of lens 16 to a point under consideration. L is the distance from light source 20 to the point under consideration. The angle of incidence of a light ray on lens 16 is identified as θ.
The goal in designing a light fixture according to the invention is to provide the appearance of a uniform light intensity across the aperture. The expression appearance is used because, in most situations, some variation will not be noticeable. Typically an intensity ratio as great as three to one from the brightest to darkest region will not be noticed. Because the appearance of uniform intensity is provided by effectively discarding some of the light, allowing the actual intensity distribution to be less than totally uniform provides greater efficiency.
Thus the designer of a light fixture must specify a desired intensity profile for the aperture of the fixture. Such a profile may be expressed as shown below.
I(R)=(v-1)(Rmax -R)/(Rmax -Rmin))+1
In this expression I is the intensity of the light projected on the optical window expressed as a function of the radial distance from the center of aperture. V is the permitted variation in intensity, expressed as a ratio of the brightest to darkest region. Rmax is the distance from the center of the aperture to the outer edge. Rmin is the radius of a central zone that is excluded from the calculation. If the region of uniformity is to go to the center of the aperture, Rmin is set equal to zero.
The actual intensity profile obtained from a light fixture may be expressed as
I(R)=α(cos(θ)/L2) T(R) φ(θ)
where T is the transmission function of the lens expressed as a function of R and φ(θ) is the light source intensity as a function of incident angle. For an ideal source φ(θ) is constant, but for a real source it may be necessary to consider it. In this expression α is a proportionality constant.
Combining these equations yields:
α=Tmax (COS(θmax))/(φ(θmax)I(Rmax) Rmax2 )
where Tmax is value of the transmission function at Rmax and θmax is the value of θ at Rmax. Once the transmission function has been defined, a lens is designed to provide that transmission function. That may be done iteratively, using a ray trace model.
FIG. 3 illustrates a portion of a typical lens that may be used as lens 16. Lens 16 is of a transparent material such as polycarbonate or an acrylic material. In the embodiment of FIG. 3, lens 16 has a structured surface, 22, and a smooth surface, 24. Structured surface 22 has structures 26, 28, and 30. It should be noted that the term "smooth" as used to describe surface 24 is a relative term and the surface could have a matte finish in order that a vapor coated metal on surface 24 would provide a diffuse reflector. In other embodiments surface 24 could have structures thereon. Typical structures that might be desired would include pillow lenses such as those used to provide the desired angular distribution of light output in an automative taillight.
Structures 26 on structured surface 22 has facets 34 and 36 making it a triangular prism. A light ray, 38, from light source 20, enters lens 16 through facet 34 and is refracted. Light ray 38 then travels across structure 26 to facet 36 where it undergoes total internal reflection. Thus facet 34 may be called a transmissive facet and facet 36 may be called a reflective facet. Alternatively light ray 40 enters lens 16 through transmissive facet 34 but misses reflective surface 36. In the example of FIG. 3 it is totally internally reflected by surface 24 although in some situations it would be transmitted at a large angle to the primary output direction of the lighting element. In either case it is effectively discarded.
The shape of each of the structures on structured surface 22 is defined by the selection of two angles, identified as angles β and γ on structure 26 and by the width of the prism. Angle β is the angle between transmissive facet 34 and smooth surface 24 while angle γ is the angle between reflective facet 36 and a normal to smooth surface 24. Angle β and the groove width are chosen to provide the desired transmission function for a particular position on lens 16 and angle γ is chosen to insure that the light emerges through optical window 14 in the desired direction.
By way of contrast with the structures shown in FIG. 3, which might be designed to be positioned relatively close to light source 20, structure 42 of FIG. 4 would be intended for use at a greater val of R. As may be seen the sizes β' and γ' of structure 42 are greater than those of β and γ of structure 26 of FIG. 3.
A lens was designed for a light fixture having a focal length of 0.6 inches, an Rmin of 0.0 inch, an Rmax of 5 inches, a fall-off factor (V) of 3 and a constant source angular intensity distribution. Given these assumptions the following lens described in the table below was designed.
______________________________________ |
R β γ Groove Width |
(inches) (degrees) (degrees) |
inches |
______________________________________ |
0 30 6.088 .00005 |
.01 30 6.088 .001 |
.05 25.988 6.397 .002 |
.1 21.5 6.972 .005 |
.2 14.5 8.49 .007 |
.3 10.54 10.282 .01 |
.4 10.14 12.366 .01 |
.5 10.301 14.196 .01 |
.6 11 15.822 .01 |
.7 12 17.258 .01 |
.8 12.94 18.476 .01 |
.9 14.18 19.601 .01 |
1 15.5 20.621 .01 |
1.3 19.04 22.551 .01 |
1.5 21.683 24.454 .01 |
2 26.615 26.962 .01 |
2.5 29.658 28.522 .01 |
3 30.72 29.323 .01 |
3.5 32.5 30.166 .01 |
4 32.5 30.451 .01 |
4.5 38.5 32.214 .01 |
5 40 32.774 .01 |
______________________________________ |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5296882, | Dec 21 1992 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Overhead projector with catadioptric fresnel lens |
5317349, | Jun 29 1993 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Overhead projector with achromatic fresnel lens |
5404869, | Apr 16 1992 | Innolux Corporation | Faceted totally internally reflecting lens with individually curved faces on facets |
5469345, | Dec 08 1993 | BIRD GARD LLC | Low profile flashlight/spotlight |
5568324, | Dec 21 1992 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Overhead projector with catadioptric fresnel lens |
5577492, | Apr 16 1992 | Innolux Corporation | Collimating TIR lens with focusing filter lens |
5577493, | Apr 16 1992 | Innolux Corporation | Auxiliary lens to modify the output flux distribution of a TIR lens |
5655832, | Apr 16 1992 | Innolux Corporation | Multiple wavelength light processor |
5668913, | Oct 19 1994 | CLIO TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Light expanding system for producing a linear or planar light beam from a point-like light source |
5676453, | Apr 16 1992 | Innolux Corporation | Collimating TIR lens devices employing fluorescent light sources |
5677972, | Feb 21 1996 | Teledyne Technologies Incorporated | High efficiency direct coupling of radiant electromagnetic energy into dielectric wave guide structure |
5720543, | Jul 19 1995 | BIRD GARD LLC | Portable flashlight |
5721795, | May 17 1996 | Teledyne Technologies Incorporated | High efficiency ejection of light from optical wave guide, by holographically produced light scattering means |
5788357, | Aug 28 1996 | K. W. Muth Company, Inc. | Mirror assembly |
5806955, | Apr 16 1992 | Innolux Corporation | TIR lens for waveguide injection |
6005724, | Oct 05 1998 | K. W. Muth Company, Inc. | Mirror coating, mirror utilizing same, and a mirror assembly |
6045243, | Aug 28 1996 | Muth Mirror Systems, LLC | Mirror assembly |
6062710, | Jun 04 1998 | LIGHTEN UP TRADING COMPANY, INC | Light fixture with at least one lens or reflector as image magnifier and a diffuser for reducing glare |
6177761, | Jul 17 1996 | SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR COMPANY, LTD | LED with light extractor |
6257746, | Nov 03 1998 | Muth Mirror Systems, LLC | Signalling assembly |
6447128, | Jul 28 2000 | Lang-Mekra North America, LLC | Rearview mirror assembly for a vehicle with monitor |
6456437, | Jan 14 1999 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Optical sheets suitable for spreading light |
6642840, | Jul 28 2000 | Lang-Mekra North America, LLC | Rearview mirror assembly with monitor |
7008091, | Dec 18 2003 | K.W. Muth Company, Inc. | Electromagnetic radiation assembly |
7025486, | Apr 10 2002 | Lang-Mekra North America, LLC | Outside mirror with blinker light for vehicles |
7241037, | Mar 23 2005 | K.W. Muth Company | Signaling assembly |
7327321, | Jun 27 2005 | Muth Mirror Systems, LLC | Electromagnetic radiation assembly |
7350925, | Sep 07 2004 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Total internal reflection Fresnel lens and optical system using the same |
7563004, | Jan 17 2006 | ABL IP Holding LLC | Volumetric downlight light fixture |
9065026, | Aug 07 2013 | GE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS, LLC | Lens element for distributing light with a uniform intensity distribution and lighting device comprised thereof |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3671101, | |||
4755921, | Apr 02 1986 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | Lens |
4874228, | Mar 24 1987 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company; MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, A CORP OF DE | Back-lit display |
4989125, | May 10 1988 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company; MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, A CORP OF DE | Reflector using fresnel-type structures having a plurality of active faces |
5029060, | Jul 17 1990 | MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, A CORP OF DE | Uniform intensity profile catadioptric lens |
GB294069, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Sep 19 1990 | Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Feb 14 1991 | NELSON, JOHN C | MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, SAINT PAUL, MN A CORP OF DE | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 005618 | /0141 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 16 1996 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Dec 23 1999 | M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Feb 02 2004 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Mar 29 2004 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 29 1995 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 29 1996 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 29 1996 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 29 1998 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 29 1999 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 29 2000 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 29 2000 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 29 2002 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 29 2003 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 29 2004 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 29 2004 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 29 2006 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |