This patent covers the concept of putting a previously sintered carbide tool or part back through the sintering process. This resintering, heals stress related microcracks which, when allowed to progress, could ultimately be a cause of the failure for the object. This produces a longer life, better quality cemented carbide tool to be used for cyclically applying pressure and/or heat.

Patent
   5186892
Priority
Jan 17 1991
Filed
Jan 17 1991
Issued
Feb 16 1993
Expiry
Jan 17 2011
Assg.orig
Entity
Small
95
1
all paid
6. A method of repairing internal cracks in a cemented carbide tool made using a predetermined sintering process, where such cracks have not yet reached the surface of the tool, comprising resintering the tool using substantially the same predetermined process.
1. A method of healing internal microcracks and internal fatigue flaws in a previously sintered cemented carbide object comprising resintering said object for a predetermined period of time at about the same as the original sintering temperatures and heating cycles.
2. A method as in claim 1 wherein said object is made of materials selected from the group consisting of cemented tungsten carbide, cemented titanium carbide and cemented tantalum carbide.
3. A method as in claim 1 wherein said resintering is carried out for substantially the same period of time and at substantially the same temperature as the initial sintering of the object.
4. A method as in claim 3 wherein the initial sintering of the object is the process for sintering green tungsten carbide, and wherein said resintering comprises said process for sintering green tungsten carbide.
5. A method as in claim 1 further comprising repeating the resintering step at selected intervals, after use of the object.
7. A method as in claim 6 further comprising resintering said tool at selected intervals after use of the tool, using substantially the same predetermined process.
8. A method as in claim 6 wherein said tool is made of material selected from the group consisting of cemented tungsten carbide, cemented titanium carbide and cemented tantalum carbide.

1. Field of the Invention

In the industrialized world, production equipment is becoming more and more complicated and expensive. Customers have become, increasingly, more demanding of high quality cemented carbide necessary for competitive production. The life of a piece of equipment mostly depends upon the durability of a few vital components exposed to wear, fatigue or corrosion. This is an important reason for concentrating on the improvement of these few expensive components.

Cemented carbide has greater wear resistance and strength than tool steels. This is why there are many tungsten carbide applications in industry today. In spite of the five to ten times additional cost, the performance justifies the additional expense. Still these carbides can be very expensive to replace. This invention relates to the process of resintering cemented carbide products to make them more durable and to prolong their life. Specifically, it is related to sintered carbide products that are loaded and unloaded cyclically and ultimately crack in a type of fatigue failure.

2. Prior Art

The process of sintering carbide has been known in the industry for over 30 years. Sintering consists of bonding powdered carbide with a binder metal from the iron group (iron, nickel, or cobalt) under high temperatures (around 1400 degrees Centigrade), in a controlled atmosphere, and with a controlled heat cycle. This forms a product with extremely high hardness and compressive strength. The strength and hardness can be varied with different amounts and types of binder metal, additives and sizes of the powdered carbide grains. Small amounts of Tantalum and Titanium are sometimes added to change the properties of the final product. After sintering, the cemented carbide tooling has a rough, and slightly irregular, surface which needs be ground to finished dimensions.

Cemented carbide has, among other things, high strength at elevated temperatures and is very resistant to wear. This makes sintered carbide valuable in cutting tool applications, metal forming tooling, and in the high pressure, high temperature industry.

It has been a major objective of the high pressure, high temperature industry to increase the life of their cemented carbide tooling. In that industry, cemented carbide tooling represents a significant expense of operation. The problem is that the tooling fails under the necessary operating conditions after a limited number of cycles. The carbide fails due to internal cracks which begin with the first cycle and are propagated exponentially with each successive cycle. Complete failure occurs when these cracks, reach the surface of the carbide and the tooling can no longer withstand the operational loads. Upon fracture, the carbide tool is no longer of use and must be replaced. The scrap value is a small portion of the original cost.

Cemented carbide users have tried to prolong the life of their tooling by various post sintering processes with mixed results. One of these processes is grinding or lapping the surface of the part, after some use, to remove some surface defects and adverse chemistry. Others have tried heat treating cemented carbide parts short of resintering temperatures with some success. But historically, the resintering of cemented carbide has been unexplored and considered an unlikely area for improving product. The conventional wisdom was that nothing could be done to heal internal cracks once they had started.

It is, therefore, the object of this invention to provide a method of improving the life of such cemented carbide parts through a resintering process and thereby reducing the cost of operating with cemented carbide.

The present invention provides a method for significantly reducing the aforesaid problem by treating the carbide part or tool utilizing a resintering process to minimize residual stresses and eliminated micro-cracking. The useful life of the sintered carbide object can be significantly improved by resintering.

Sometime after the time that the cemented carbide tooling is ground and before the time that the it fails, the part is resintered using any sintering process commonly used in the industry to sinter tungsten carbide. The part is put through a process not limited to but including the following:

The carbide object is placed in a standard sintering furnace. A vacuum or hydrogen atmosphere is used to control the environment. Then, according to the type of furnace used, the operational sequence of outgasing, heat up, soak, and cool down is determined. The object is then brought to the sintering temperature of about 1350 C. or higher depending on the composition. The resintering temperature and heat cycle is the same as the original sintering temperatures and heating cycles.

In the original sintering process, the carbide grade and composition is determined and components are mixed. Typically, the components are milled for several days in a ball mill or several hours in an attriter. The mix is then weight out and prepressed into the desired shape. In this green unfired state the carbide has little strength and low density.

These green parts are then placed in a sintering furnace and are brought up, slowly, to the desired temperature. When the sintering temperature is reached, the carbide is partially dissolved into the cobalt. The cobalt melts and the part shrinks. When fully cooled the carbide becomes solid, the resulting material is very hard and sometimes ready for application in its sintered state. More often, the parts are finished by grinding or lapping.

The resintering process takes an already dense, and hard piece of carbide and puts it back into the sintering furnace to go through, essentially, the same cycle again. But, instead of getting shrinkage and a more density, as in the first sintering operation, the part remains very nearly the same in physical properties. The same phase changes occur as in the original sinter, that is, cobalt dissolves some carbide and the cobalt goes liquid. But with repeat sintering, the internal stresses are relieved and the internal micro cracks are healed. Larger grains of carbide, that occur on the surface of some parts, migrate and tend to mix uniformly through out the part. If sintered properly, the part actually comes out of the furnace with many improved properties making the part, in many respects, better than the original.

It should be noted that internally the part is clean from contaminants because cracks have not reached the surface and, therefore, have not been exposed to outside air and other contaminants. Any cracks which have come to the surface will not mend in the same way by this process and will produce inferior parts if resintered.

Sintering carbide products is not a new process. The practice of resintering is a new idea that can make carbide objects used for cyclical loading last longer. Experimental results show that the effective life of cemented carbide tooling used in the diamond synthesis industry can be more than doubled. Even though failure of carbide objects is a costly, time consuming problem, no one has successfully applied the idea of resintering the cemented carbide tooling to lengthen life. Generally, cemented carbide tooling is used until failure occurs, then the part cannot be further used. Upon failure the tooling must be removed and scrapped. In the high pressure high temperature industry the cost of the cemented carbide is a very significant portion of the overall costs. The application of this patent can have a dramatic economic impact on many cemented carbide users.

Carbide parts can be sometimes unpredictable in their fatigue patterns. When one part goes catastrophically, it will sometimes cause the failure of parts near by. If, by practice, these parts were taken out, periodically, and sent through a resintering process, they could be healed of many precarious but not fatal, fatigue cracks. The life of that part would then be lengthened. The loss of other parts by proximity failure could be controlled by not allowing a neighbor part to approach the failure stage as frequently. By this, down time would be reduced and the possibility of major damage being done to the whole apparatus also diminished.

High pressure presses, using tungsten carbide tooling, apply the ultra-high pressures needed for synthesizing diamond products. This tooling fails regularly. Each tungsten carbide anvil, belt or punch costs thousands of dollars and requires a lengthy and costly labor process to replace.

If this invention is applied, the tooling is removed before complete failure and is replaced by new or resintered tooling. The removed tooling is then put through the resintering process. It has been shown that this tooling will be useful for several thousand more cycles and that it is possible to repeat the process of resintering over and over again.

A group of forty six tungsten carbide anvils, used on a cubic 2000 ton press, were monitored until failure. All of the anvils had at least 1000 cycles. Nineteen were resintered one to three times. Twenty seven were allowed to run until failure with no resinter. After the failure of both groups of anvils, the total cycles of each anvil was recorded.

The results were surprising. The conventional wisdom of the sintering industry disclosed that: First, the anvils would not survive the resinter furnace and second, the original physical properties would be substantially diminished. Instead, the anvils not only survived the ovens but the properties actually improved. A single resinter more than doubled the average life of the anvils. Three resinters more than tripled the average life. Overall, the nineteen anvils that had been resintered at least once had an average cycle life of 4303 runs. Of the 27 single sintered anvils, the average cycle life was 1758 runs.

Pope, Louis M.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10029391, Oct 26 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High impact resistant tool with an apex width between a first and second transitions
10265813, Mar 15 2013 SANDVIK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Method of joining sintered parts of different sizes and shapes
10378288, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Downhole drill bit incorporating cutting elements of different geometries
7320505, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Attack tool
7338135, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Holder for a degradation assembly
7384105, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Attack tool
7387345, Aug 11 2006 NOVATEK IP, LLC Lubricating drum
7390066, Aug 11 2006 NOVATEK IP, LLC Method for providing a degradation drum
7396086, Mar 15 2007 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Press-fit pick
7401863, Mar 15 2007 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Press-fit pick
7410221, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Retainer sleeve in a degradation assembly
7413256, Aug 11 2006 Caterpillar SARL Washer for a degradation assembly
7413258, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Hollow pick shank
7419224, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Sleeve in a degradation assembly
7445294, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Attack tool
7464993, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Attack tool
7469971, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Lubricated pick
7469972, Jun 16 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Wear resistant tool
7475948, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Pick with a bearing
7568770, Jun 16 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Superhard composite material bonded to a steel body
7588102, Oct 26 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High impact resistant tool
7600823, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Pick assembly
7628233, Jul 23 2008 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Carbide bolster
7635168, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Degradation assembly shield
7637574, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Pick assembly
7648210, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Pick with an interlocked bolster
7661765, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Braze thickness control
7712693, Aug 11 2006 NOVATEK IP, LLC Degradation insert with overhang
7717365, Aug 11 2006 NOVATEK IP, LLC Degradation insert with overhang
7740414, Mar 01 2005 NOVATEK IP, LLC Milling apparatus for a paved surface
7832808, Oct 30 2007 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Tool holder sleeve
7832809, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Degradation assembly shield
7871133, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Locking fixture
7926883, May 15 2007 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Spring loaded pick
7946656, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Retention system
7946657, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Retention for an insert
7950746, Jun 16 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Attack tool for degrading materials
7963617, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Degradation assembly
7976238, Dec 01 2006 NOVATEK IP, LLC End of a moldboard positioned proximate a milling drum
7976239, Dec 01 2006 NOVATEK IP, LLC End of a moldboard positioned proximate a milling drum
7992944, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Manually rotatable tool
7992945, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Hollow pick shank
7997661, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Tapered bore in a pick
8007050, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Degradation assembly
8007051, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Shank assembly
8028774, Oct 26 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Thick pointed superhard material
8029068, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Locking fixture for a degradation assembly
8033615, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Retention system
8033616, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Braze thickness control
8038223, Sep 07 2007 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Pick with carbide cap
8061457, Feb 17 2009 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Chamfered pointed enhanced diamond insert
8109349, Oct 26 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Thick pointed superhard material
8118371, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Resilient pick shank
8123302, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Impact tool
8136887, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Non-rotating pick with a pressed in carbide segment
8201892, Aug 11 2006 NOVATEK INC Holder assembly
8215420, Aug 11 2006 HALL, DAVID R Thermally stable pointed diamond with increased impact resistance
8250786, Jun 30 2010 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Measuring mechanism in a bore hole of a pointed cutting element
8261471, Jun 30 2010 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Continuously adjusting resultant force in an excavating assembly
8262168, Sep 22 2010 NOVATEK IP, LLC Multiple milling drums secured to the underside of a single milling machine
8292372, Dec 21 2007 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Retention for holder shank
8322796, Apr 16 2009 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Seal with contact element for pick shield
8342611, May 15 2007 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Spring loaded pick
8365845, Feb 12 2007 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High impact resistant tool
8403595, Dec 01 2006 NOVATEK IP, LLC Plurality of liquid jet nozzles and a blower mechanism that are directed into a milling chamber
8414085, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Shank assembly with a tensioned element
8434573, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Degradation assembly
8449039, Aug 16 2010 NOVATEK IP, LLC Pick assembly with integrated piston
8449040, Aug 11 2006 NOVATEK, INC Shank for an attack tool
8453497, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Test fixture that positions a cutting element at a positive rake angle
8454096, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High-impact resistant tool
8485609, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Impact tool
8485756, Dec 01 2006 NOVATEK IP, LLC Heated liquid nozzles incorporated into a moldboard
8500209, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Manually rotatable tool
8500210, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Resilient pick shank
8534767, Aug 11 2006 NOVATEK IP, LLC Manually rotatable tool
8540037, Apr 30 2008 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Layered polycrystalline diamond
8567532, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Cutting element attached to downhole fixed bladed bit at a positive rake angle
8590644, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Downhole drill bit
8622155, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Pointed diamond working ends on a shear bit
8646848, Dec 21 2007 NOVATEK IP, LLC Resilient connection between a pick shank and block
8668275, Jul 06 2011 Pick assembly with a contiguous spinal region
8714285, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method for drilling with a fixed bladed bit
8728382, Mar 29 2011 NOVATEK IP, LLC Forming a polycrystalline ceramic in multiple sintering phases
8931854, Apr 30 2008 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Layered polycrystalline diamond
8960337, Oct 26 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High impact resistant tool with an apex width between a first and second transitions
9051794, Apr 12 2007 Schlumberger Technology Corporation High impact shearing element
9051795, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Downhole drill bit
9068410, Oct 26 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Dense diamond body
9366089, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Cutting element attached to downhole fixed bladed bit at a positive rake angle
9498824, Mar 15 2013 SANFVIK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AB Method of joining sintered parts of different sizes and shapes
9540886, Oct 26 2006 NOVATEK IP, LLC Thick pointed superhard material
9708856, Aug 11 2006 Smith International, Inc. Downhole drill bit
9915102, Aug 11 2006 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Pointed working ends on a bit
D554162, Mar 27 2007 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Diamond enhanced cutting element
Patent Priority Assignee Title
3595484,
////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jan 17 1991U.S. Synthetic Corporation(assignment on the face of the patent)
Feb 15 1991POPE, LOUIS MC CONKIEU S SYNTHETIC CORPORATIONASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST 0056420667 pdf
Feb 22 1991POPE, LOUIS MC CONKIEGENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, 6325 HUNTLEY ROAD, WORTHINGTON, OHSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0056200860 pdf
Feb 22 1991US Synthetic CorporationGENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, 6325 HUNTLEY ROAD, WORTHINGTON, OHSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0056200860 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Apr 08 1996M283: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity.
Aug 07 2000M284: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity.
Aug 11 2004M2553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Yr, Small Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Feb 16 19964 years fee payment window open
Aug 16 19966 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 16 1997patent expiry (for year 4)
Feb 16 19992 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Feb 16 20008 years fee payment window open
Aug 16 20006 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 16 2001patent expiry (for year 8)
Feb 16 20032 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Feb 16 200412 years fee payment window open
Aug 16 20046 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 16 2005patent expiry (for year 12)
Feb 16 20072 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)