This patent covers the concept of putting a previously sintered carbide tool or part back through the sintering process. This resintering, heals stress related microcracks which, when allowed to progress, could ultimately be a cause of the failure for the object. This produces a longer life, better quality cemented carbide tool to be used for cyclically applying pressure and/or heat.
|
6. A method of repairing internal cracks in a cemented carbide tool made using a predetermined sintering process, where such cracks have not yet reached the surface of the tool, comprising resintering the tool using substantially the same predetermined process.
1. A method of healing internal microcracks and internal fatigue flaws in a previously sintered cemented carbide object comprising resintering said object for a predetermined period of time at about the same as the original sintering temperatures and heating cycles.
2. A method as in
3. A method as in
4. A method as in
5. A method as in
7. A method as in
8. A method as in
|
1. Field of the Invention
In the industrialized world, production equipment is becoming more and more complicated and expensive. Customers have become, increasingly, more demanding of high quality cemented carbide necessary for competitive production. The life of a piece of equipment mostly depends upon the durability of a few vital components exposed to wear, fatigue or corrosion. This is an important reason for concentrating on the improvement of these few expensive components.
Cemented carbide has greater wear resistance and strength than tool steels. This is why there are many tungsten carbide applications in industry today. In spite of the five to ten times additional cost, the performance justifies the additional expense. Still these carbides can be very expensive to replace. This invention relates to the process of resintering cemented carbide products to make them more durable and to prolong their life. Specifically, it is related to sintered carbide products that are loaded and unloaded cyclically and ultimately crack in a type of fatigue failure.
2. Prior Art
The process of sintering carbide has been known in the industry for over 30 years. Sintering consists of bonding powdered carbide with a binder metal from the iron group (iron, nickel, or cobalt) under high temperatures (around 1400 degrees Centigrade), in a controlled atmosphere, and with a controlled heat cycle. This forms a product with extremely high hardness and compressive strength. The strength and hardness can be varied with different amounts and types of binder metal, additives and sizes of the powdered carbide grains. Small amounts of Tantalum and Titanium are sometimes added to change the properties of the final product. After sintering, the cemented carbide tooling has a rough, and slightly irregular, surface which needs be ground to finished dimensions.
Cemented carbide has, among other things, high strength at elevated temperatures and is very resistant to wear. This makes sintered carbide valuable in cutting tool applications, metal forming tooling, and in the high pressure, high temperature industry.
It has been a major objective of the high pressure, high temperature industry to increase the life of their cemented carbide tooling. In that industry, cemented carbide tooling represents a significant expense of operation. The problem is that the tooling fails under the necessary operating conditions after a limited number of cycles. The carbide fails due to internal cracks which begin with the first cycle and are propagated exponentially with each successive cycle. Complete failure occurs when these cracks, reach the surface of the carbide and the tooling can no longer withstand the operational loads. Upon fracture, the carbide tool is no longer of use and must be replaced. The scrap value is a small portion of the original cost.
Cemented carbide users have tried to prolong the life of their tooling by various post sintering processes with mixed results. One of these processes is grinding or lapping the surface of the part, after some use, to remove some surface defects and adverse chemistry. Others have tried heat treating cemented carbide parts short of resintering temperatures with some success. But historically, the resintering of cemented carbide has been unexplored and considered an unlikely area for improving product. The conventional wisdom was that nothing could be done to heal internal cracks once they had started.
It is, therefore, the object of this invention to provide a method of improving the life of such cemented carbide parts through a resintering process and thereby reducing the cost of operating with cemented carbide.
The present invention provides a method for significantly reducing the aforesaid problem by treating the carbide part or tool utilizing a resintering process to minimize residual stresses and eliminated micro-cracking. The useful life of the sintered carbide object can be significantly improved by resintering.
Sometime after the time that the cemented carbide tooling is ground and before the time that the it fails, the part is resintered using any sintering process commonly used in the industry to sinter tungsten carbide. The part is put through a process not limited to but including the following:
The carbide object is placed in a standard sintering furnace. A vacuum or hydrogen atmosphere is used to control the environment. Then, according to the type of furnace used, the operational sequence of outgasing, heat up, soak, and cool down is determined. The object is then brought to the sintering temperature of about 1350 C. or higher depending on the composition. The resintering temperature and heat cycle is the same as the original sintering temperatures and heating cycles.
In the original sintering process, the carbide grade and composition is determined and components are mixed. Typically, the components are milled for several days in a ball mill or several hours in an attriter. The mix is then weight out and prepressed into the desired shape. In this green unfired state the carbide has little strength and low density.
These green parts are then placed in a sintering furnace and are brought up, slowly, to the desired temperature. When the sintering temperature is reached, the carbide is partially dissolved into the cobalt. The cobalt melts and the part shrinks. When fully cooled the carbide becomes solid, the resulting material is very hard and sometimes ready for application in its sintered state. More often, the parts are finished by grinding or lapping.
The resintering process takes an already dense, and hard piece of carbide and puts it back into the sintering furnace to go through, essentially, the same cycle again. But, instead of getting shrinkage and a more density, as in the first sintering operation, the part remains very nearly the same in physical properties. The same phase changes occur as in the original sinter, that is, cobalt dissolves some carbide and the cobalt goes liquid. But with repeat sintering, the internal stresses are relieved and the internal micro cracks are healed. Larger grains of carbide, that occur on the surface of some parts, migrate and tend to mix uniformly through out the part. If sintered properly, the part actually comes out of the furnace with many improved properties making the part, in many respects, better than the original.
It should be noted that internally the part is clean from contaminants because cracks have not reached the surface and, therefore, have not been exposed to outside air and other contaminants. Any cracks which have come to the surface will not mend in the same way by this process and will produce inferior parts if resintered.
Sintering carbide products is not a new process. The practice of resintering is a new idea that can make carbide objects used for cyclical loading last longer. Experimental results show that the effective life of cemented carbide tooling used in the diamond synthesis industry can be more than doubled. Even though failure of carbide objects is a costly, time consuming problem, no one has successfully applied the idea of resintering the cemented carbide tooling to lengthen life. Generally, cemented carbide tooling is used until failure occurs, then the part cannot be further used. Upon failure the tooling must be removed and scrapped. In the high pressure high temperature industry the cost of the cemented carbide is a very significant portion of the overall costs. The application of this patent can have a dramatic economic impact on many cemented carbide users.
Carbide parts can be sometimes unpredictable in their fatigue patterns. When one part goes catastrophically, it will sometimes cause the failure of parts near by. If, by practice, these parts were taken out, periodically, and sent through a resintering process, they could be healed of many precarious but not fatal, fatigue cracks. The life of that part would then be lengthened. The loss of other parts by proximity failure could be controlled by not allowing a neighbor part to approach the failure stage as frequently. By this, down time would be reduced and the possibility of major damage being done to the whole apparatus also diminished.
High pressure presses, using tungsten carbide tooling, apply the ultra-high pressures needed for synthesizing diamond products. This tooling fails regularly. Each tungsten carbide anvil, belt or punch costs thousands of dollars and requires a lengthy and costly labor process to replace.
If this invention is applied, the tooling is removed before complete failure and is replaced by new or resintered tooling. The removed tooling is then put through the resintering process. It has been shown that this tooling will be useful for several thousand more cycles and that it is possible to repeat the process of resintering over and over again.
A group of forty six tungsten carbide anvils, used on a cubic 2000 ton press, were monitored until failure. All of the anvils had at least 1000 cycles. Nineteen were resintered one to three times. Twenty seven were allowed to run until failure with no resinter. After the failure of both groups of anvils, the total cycles of each anvil was recorded.
The results were surprising. The conventional wisdom of the sintering industry disclosed that: First, the anvils would not survive the resinter furnace and second, the original physical properties would be substantially diminished. Instead, the anvils not only survived the ovens but the properties actually improved. A single resinter more than doubled the average life of the anvils. Three resinters more than tripled the average life. Overall, the nineteen anvils that had been resintered at least once had an average cycle life of 4303 runs. Of the 27 single sintered anvils, the average cycle life was 1758 runs.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10029391, | Oct 26 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | High impact resistant tool with an apex width between a first and second transitions |
10265813, | Mar 15 2013 | SANDVIK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY | Method of joining sintered parts of different sizes and shapes |
10378288, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Downhole drill bit incorporating cutting elements of different geometries |
7320505, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Attack tool |
7338135, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Holder for a degradation assembly |
7384105, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Attack tool |
7387345, | Aug 11 2006 | NOVATEK IP, LLC | Lubricating drum |
7390066, | Aug 11 2006 | NOVATEK IP, LLC | Method for providing a degradation drum |
7396086, | Mar 15 2007 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Press-fit pick |
7401863, | Mar 15 2007 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Press-fit pick |
7410221, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Retainer sleeve in a degradation assembly |
7413256, | Aug 11 2006 | Caterpillar SARL | Washer for a degradation assembly |
7413258, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Hollow pick shank |
7419224, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Sleeve in a degradation assembly |
7445294, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Attack tool |
7464993, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Attack tool |
7469971, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Lubricated pick |
7469972, | Jun 16 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Wear resistant tool |
7475948, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Pick with a bearing |
7568770, | Jun 16 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Superhard composite material bonded to a steel body |
7588102, | Oct 26 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | High impact resistant tool |
7600823, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Pick assembly |
7628233, | Jul 23 2008 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Carbide bolster |
7635168, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Degradation assembly shield |
7637574, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Pick assembly |
7648210, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Pick with an interlocked bolster |
7661765, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Braze thickness control |
7712693, | Aug 11 2006 | NOVATEK IP, LLC | Degradation insert with overhang |
7717365, | Aug 11 2006 | NOVATEK IP, LLC | Degradation insert with overhang |
7740414, | Mar 01 2005 | NOVATEK IP, LLC | Milling apparatus for a paved surface |
7832808, | Oct 30 2007 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Tool holder sleeve |
7832809, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Degradation assembly shield |
7871133, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Locking fixture |
7926883, | May 15 2007 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Spring loaded pick |
7946656, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Retention system |
7946657, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Retention for an insert |
7950746, | Jun 16 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Attack tool for degrading materials |
7963617, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Degradation assembly |
7976238, | Dec 01 2006 | NOVATEK IP, LLC | End of a moldboard positioned proximate a milling drum |
7976239, | Dec 01 2006 | NOVATEK IP, LLC | End of a moldboard positioned proximate a milling drum |
7992944, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Manually rotatable tool |
7992945, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Hollow pick shank |
7997661, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Tapered bore in a pick |
8007050, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Degradation assembly |
8007051, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Shank assembly |
8028774, | Oct 26 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Thick pointed superhard material |
8029068, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Locking fixture for a degradation assembly |
8033615, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Retention system |
8033616, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Braze thickness control |
8038223, | Sep 07 2007 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Pick with carbide cap |
8061457, | Feb 17 2009 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Chamfered pointed enhanced diamond insert |
8109349, | Oct 26 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Thick pointed superhard material |
8118371, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Resilient pick shank |
8123302, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Impact tool |
8136887, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Non-rotating pick with a pressed in carbide segment |
8201892, | Aug 11 2006 | NOVATEK INC | Holder assembly |
8215420, | Aug 11 2006 | HALL, DAVID R | Thermally stable pointed diamond with increased impact resistance |
8250786, | Jun 30 2010 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Measuring mechanism in a bore hole of a pointed cutting element |
8261471, | Jun 30 2010 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Continuously adjusting resultant force in an excavating assembly |
8262168, | Sep 22 2010 | NOVATEK IP, LLC | Multiple milling drums secured to the underside of a single milling machine |
8292372, | Dec 21 2007 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Retention for holder shank |
8322796, | Apr 16 2009 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Seal with contact element for pick shield |
8342611, | May 15 2007 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Spring loaded pick |
8365845, | Feb 12 2007 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | High impact resistant tool |
8403595, | Dec 01 2006 | NOVATEK IP, LLC | Plurality of liquid jet nozzles and a blower mechanism that are directed into a milling chamber |
8414085, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Shank assembly with a tensioned element |
8434573, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Degradation assembly |
8449039, | Aug 16 2010 | NOVATEK IP, LLC | Pick assembly with integrated piston |
8449040, | Aug 11 2006 | NOVATEK, INC | Shank for an attack tool |
8453497, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Test fixture that positions a cutting element at a positive rake angle |
8454096, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | High-impact resistant tool |
8485609, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Impact tool |
8485756, | Dec 01 2006 | NOVATEK IP, LLC | Heated liquid nozzles incorporated into a moldboard |
8500209, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Manually rotatable tool |
8500210, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Resilient pick shank |
8534767, | Aug 11 2006 | NOVATEK IP, LLC | Manually rotatable tool |
8540037, | Apr 30 2008 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Layered polycrystalline diamond |
8567532, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Cutting element attached to downhole fixed bladed bit at a positive rake angle |
8590644, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Downhole drill bit |
8622155, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Pointed diamond working ends on a shear bit |
8646848, | Dec 21 2007 | NOVATEK IP, LLC | Resilient connection between a pick shank and block |
8668275, | Jul 06 2011 | Pick assembly with a contiguous spinal region | |
8714285, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method for drilling with a fixed bladed bit |
8728382, | Mar 29 2011 | NOVATEK IP, LLC | Forming a polycrystalline ceramic in multiple sintering phases |
8931854, | Apr 30 2008 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Layered polycrystalline diamond |
8960337, | Oct 26 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | High impact resistant tool with an apex width between a first and second transitions |
9051794, | Apr 12 2007 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | High impact shearing element |
9051795, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Downhole drill bit |
9068410, | Oct 26 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Dense diamond body |
9366089, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Cutting element attached to downhole fixed bladed bit at a positive rake angle |
9498824, | Mar 15 2013 | SANFVIK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AB | Method of joining sintered parts of different sizes and shapes |
9540886, | Oct 26 2006 | NOVATEK IP, LLC | Thick pointed superhard material |
9708856, | Aug 11 2006 | Smith International, Inc. | Downhole drill bit |
9915102, | Aug 11 2006 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Pointed working ends on a bit |
D554162, | Mar 27 2007 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Diamond enhanced cutting element |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3595484, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 17 1991 | U.S. Synthetic Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Feb 15 1991 | POPE, LOUIS MC CONKIE | U S SYNTHETIC CORPORATION | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST | 005642 | /0667 | |
Feb 22 1991 | POPE, LOUIS MC CONKIE | GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, 6325 HUNTLEY ROAD, WORTHINGTON, OH | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 005620 | /0860 | |
Feb 22 1991 | US Synthetic Corporation | GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, 6325 HUNTLEY ROAD, WORTHINGTON, OH | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 005620 | /0860 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 08 1996 | M283: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Aug 07 2000 | M284: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity. |
Aug 11 2004 | M2553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Yr, Small Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Feb 16 1996 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Aug 16 1996 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 16 1997 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Feb 16 1999 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Feb 16 2000 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Aug 16 2000 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 16 2001 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Feb 16 2003 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Feb 16 2004 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Aug 16 2004 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 16 2005 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Feb 16 2007 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |