The invention relates to the simultaneous determination of the distance and the speed of a target in a radar system that operates according to the HPRF (High pulse repetition frequency) method. A target spectrum group is determined in the doppler domain and the distance of the target is then determined from the group delay.
|
1. A method for simultaneously determining the distance and speed of a target in a radar system operating according to the high pulse repetition frequency method, comprising:
if a target is reported, determining the group delay of a target spectrum in the doppler domain; and determining the distance of the target from the group delay;
wherein: a transmitted signal is employed which contains pulses that include an alternating voltage signal component at a transmitting frequency; a predetermined number of pulses are combined into a burst; bursts are transmitted at a burst repetition duration; a demodulated signal is sampled precisely once within a pulse repetition duration so that a sampled signal results; the sampled signal is processed with a fast fourier transformation operation; the fourier transform is formed in each case from a reflected burst and thus from a burst that is shifted in time relative to the transmitted signal; a phase curve of the fourier transform is determined at a frequency point equal to a doppler frequency; the phase curve is differentiated according to the frequency and the group delay at the frequency point; and the distance of the target is determined from the group delay. 2. A method according to
3. A method according to
4. A method according to
|
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a method for the simultaneous determination of the distance and the speed of a target in a radar system.
2. Background Information
In radar systems operating according to the (High Pulse Repetition Frequency) method, the speed can be determined unequivocally up to a maximum speed of approximately Mach nine. The higher the unambiguity range for the determination of the speed, however, the smaller is the unambiguity range in the distance direction for a determination of the distance of a target. Typically, this unambiguity range is presently limited to a maximum distance of approximately one kilometer.
It is the object of the invention to improve a method of this type in that, while maintaining an unambiguous speed range up to a maximum speed of at least Mach nine, it becomes possible to unambiguously determine the distance of a target in a distance range whose maximum distance limit is substantially greater than one kilometer.
This is accomplished by determining the group delay of the target spectrum in the Doppler domain and determining the distance of the target from the group delay.
One advantage of the invention is that even if a target travels at a maximum speed of Mach nine, its distance can still be unequivocally determined up to a maximum distance of approximately 400 km.
The invention is based on the fact that in an HPRF method the transmitted signals put out by the radar antenna and reflected by a moving target are evaluated in the Doppler domain. For this purpose, the group delay of the target spectrum associated with the moving target is initially determined for the received signal, which essentially corresponds to the reflected transmitted signal, and then the desired distance is determined from the group delay.
The invention will now be described in greater detail with reference to one embodiment thereof in conjunction with the drawings in which:
FIG. 1 shows the real component of a transmitted signal versus time;
FIG. 2 shows a typical arrangement of an aircraft equipped with a radar system;
FIG. 3 shows a processing of radar signals;
FIG. 4 shows a phase ranging process; and
FIG. 5 shows a non-fluctuating received signal.
In the example below it is assumed that a pulse modulated Doppler radar system is available in an airborne vehicle, for example an aircraft, and operates at a high pulse repetition rate, called the "HPRF mode" in the English-language literature. Such a radar system suitable for an airborne vehicle is also called "airborne radar". The HPRF mode is usually employed as a search mode in an airborne radar system.
The real component Re{s(t)} (ordinate) of the transmitted signal s(t) of such a search mode is plotted in FIG. 1 over the time t (abscissa). This transmitted signal s(t) is composed of pulses having a time duration τ. The pulses are repeated periodically in time after a pulse repetition time T. The pulses include an alternating voltage signal at a transmitting frequency fO. The points in FIG. 1 indicate that pulses are transmitted successively in time.
The transmitted signal s(t) can be described mathematically as follows: ##EQU1## where rr (t) is the normalized amplitude of the transmitted signal.
FIG. 2 shows a typical arrangement of an aircraft F equipped with a radar system operating in the HPRF mode and a target Z which, for the description below, is considered to be dot shaped.
From such a dot-shaped target Z, which moves from a distance r at a relative speed vr toward the antenna, the following reflected received signal sr (t) is obtained: ##EQU2##
In Equation (2) it is not considered that the antenna is directed toward target Z only for a finite time and that the amplitude a of the received signal may fluctuate for real targets. In Equation (2), tr is the delay of the signal and fD the Doppler shift. Taking c as the speed of light, the following applies for these two parameters: ##EQU3##
The signals are processed in the HPRF search mode as described below. First, the received signal sr (t) is demodulated with transmitting frequency fO and then it is sampled exactly once within a pulse repetition period T. Then the DFT (FFT) is formed section by section from the sampled signal y(1) for N points (N=2048) as shown in FIG. 3 according to the following formulas: ##EQU4##
The starting point N1 for the first FFT ("Fast Fourier Transformation") is arbitrary. The starting points Nx of the subsequent FFTs then depend on the pause times between the FFTs, the length of the preceding FFTs (in this case, this is always constant =N) and the original starting point N1.
In the so-called "phase ranging" process according to FIG. 4, the transmitted signal is not composed of a pulse train of infinite length but of bursts of a length NB T. The transmitted signal is further characterized by the burst repetition duration Tx. From this it results that the received signal is also divided into bursts. Such a received signal is shown in FIG. 5 for a non-fluctuating target (non-fluctuating received signal). In this case, according to Equation (3a), the delay tr of the bursts is directly proportional to the distance r of the target. However, if there is a lot of noise interference, the parameter tr can no longer be determined directly from the time signal. Therefore the delay tr is estimated with the aid of the phase curve in the FFT. The length N of the FFT must here be selected to be less than the burst repetition duration Tx. The following condition results:
NT+TP <TX (5)
where
NT=length of the FFT
TP =pause time
TX =burst repetition duration
with TP being the pause time between the individual FFTs.
In such a phase ranging process the transmitted signal can be described by the following formula: ##EQU5## where ##EQU6## with * representing the convolution operator.
In contrast to Equation (2), for a non-fluctuating target an associated received signal sr (t) results according to the following formula: ##EQU7##
This received signal is demodulated with the aid of transmitting frequency fO so that a demodulated signal y(t) results according to the following formula: ##EQU8##
If now the Fourier transform is formed for only one burst from this reflected signal which is shifted in time with respect to the transmitted signal, according to the following formulas: ##EQU9## the delay tr is contained in all phase curves ψX (f) proportional to the frequency f, according to the following formulas:
ψX (f)=Im{logYX (f)}
ψx (f)=2πftr +φX (11)
The phase derivation according to the frequency yields the group delay tgx (f) as follows: ##EQU10## which is then directly proportional to the distance r of the target.
For lower signal to noise ratios (S/N<30 dB), tgx (f) is advantageously estimated at frequency point f=fO.
If a radar system operates, for example, in an HPRF mode which employs the following data:
pulse repetition duration T (=1 /pulse repetition rate) =5.0 μsec=1/(200 kHz);
duty cycle τ/T: 0.1≦τ/T ≦0.4;
FFT length N: 2048;
burst repetition duration Tx : 11 msec>2048 T+TP ;
such a radar system is able to unequivocally determine the distance of a target, e.g., an aircraft, moving at a high speed up to a maximum distance of approximately 400 km.
The invention is not limited to the described embodiment but can be applied in the same sense for others. For example, such a radar system may also be employed in a stationary or mobile surveillance system on the ground.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5659320, | Dec 01 1994 | Societe Nationale Industrielle Aerospatiale | Method and device for determining the speed of a moving object by means of a pulse-compression radar or sonar |
6686871, | Nov 24 2001 | Eads Deutschland GmbH | Method for HPRF-radar measurement |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4338604, | Jul 31 1979 | Le Materiel Telephonique Thomson-CSF | Pulsed coherent doppler radar with frequency agility |
4382258, | Oct 26 1979 | Thomson-CSF | Airborne frequency-modulation radar and its application to a missile homing head |
4916452, | Nov 16 1985 | Telefunken Systemtechnik GmbH | Process for range measurement with a pulse radar of high pulse repetition frequency |
4920347, | May 07 1988 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Pulse doppler radar system |
EP336273A3, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 12 1993 | NAGEL, DIETER | Deutsche Aerospace AG | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 006572 | /0920 | |
Feb 12 1993 | Deutsche Aerospace AG | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Aug 07 1997 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Apr 14 2000 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Aug 22 2001 | M184: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 08 2005 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Mar 15 1997 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Sep 15 1997 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 15 1998 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Mar 15 2000 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Mar 15 2001 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Sep 15 2001 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 15 2002 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Mar 15 2004 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Mar 15 2005 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Sep 15 2005 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 15 2006 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Mar 15 2008 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |