A device for sorting animals has a first electronic sensor for scanning animals, at least one downstream gate swingable back and forth in accordance with indicators that identify the animals detected by the first sensor to provide alternating access to one of at least two exits, and an entrance upstream of the at least one swingable gate. The entrance opens and closes in response to animal-identification indicators detected by a second sensor.
|
1. A device for sorting animals, comprising:
a first electronic sensor for scanning animals; at least one downstream gate swingable back and forth in accordance with indicators that identify the animals detected by the first sensor to provide alternating access to one of at least two exits, and an entrance upstream of the at least one swingable gate and opening and closing in response to animal-identification indicators detected by second sensor.
2. The device as in
6. The device as in
|
The invention concerns a device for sorting animals. The animals are scanned by an electronic sensor. A downstream gate swings back and forth in accordance with indicators that identify the animals and are detected by the sensor, providing alternating access to one of at least two exits.
A device of this genus is known from EP 0 499 428 A1. The number of animals traveling through the device has to be controlled to prevent one or more from traveling through too rapidly for the gate to handle and accordingly contaminating the process.
The object of the present invention is a device of the same genus that will ensure rapid and reliable sorting of even a powerful press of animals.
This object is attained by an entrance upstream of the swinging gate. The entrance opens and closes in response to animal-identification indicators detected by an additional sensor.
The entrance is initially closed and does not open when an arriving animal is scanned by the first sensor until access to the associated exit has been provided. The result is reliable sorting. The entrance remains open as long as the second sensor indicates that animals with the same indicators are traveling through the device, and closes when different indicators are detected. Since the entrance closes only occasionally, more animals can travel through in the same time.
The second sensor should be positioned at a sufficient distance upstream of the first sensor and in the vicinity of the entrance to ensure that the entrance closes at the proper time. That distance is at least 2 meters in one practical version. It should not, however, exceed 8 meters.
One practical embodiment of the device includes several swinging gates and associated exits, allowing the animals to be sorted into more than two groups.
The preliminary command for opening and closing the entrance can also derive from other areas that accommodate animals, the instantaneous coverage of a milking system for example.
One embodiment of the present invention will now be specified with reference to the accompanying drawing, which comprises a single FIGURE.
The FIGURE is a top View of a device according to the present invention.
The device for sorting animals illustrated in the FIGURE includes an intake 1 with an entrance 2 and two sensors 3 and 4. Sensors 3 and 4 are separated by a distance A, which ranges between 2 and 8 meters. Downstream of entrance 2 is an animal-sorting gate 5 that alternately opens and closes exits 6 and 7.
Second sensor 4 identifies an animal entering intake 1 and compares the data with those of the previously identified animal. Entrance 2 remains open as long as the data are identical and closes when an animal with a different indicator is detected. This animal is then identified by first sensor 3, which initiates an appropriate repositioning of sorting gate 5. Only then will entrance 2 open again and remain open until second sensor 4 detects an animal exhibiting a different indicator. At this stage the animals can travel rapidly through the device without entailing any risk of incorrect sorting. Once all the animals have been sorted out into another area of the accommodation, the preliminary command can be initiated from that area to change the state of entrance 2.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5803015, | Jan 21 1997 | DELAVAL INC | Dairy parlor entry gate |
5979365, | Apr 09 1997 | ROCKWOOD MEADOWS | Animal sorting module |
6213052, | Apr 29 1996 | GEA WestfaliaSurge GmbH | Device and method for milking animals |
6341582, | Sep 28 1998 | WESTFALIA DAIRY SYSTEMS, INC ; WESTFALIA-SURGE, INC | Livestock sorting system |
6470825, | Nov 15 1999 | Electronic livestock breeding and management system | |
8132538, | Jun 08 2006 | System and method for gestation of sows in large pen gestation facilities | |
8418660, | Apr 09 2009 | LELY PATENT N.V. | Facilities for and method of separating and sorting livestock |
8919294, | Apr 14 2008 | LELY PATENT N.V. | Facilities for and method of separating and sorting livestock |
9119373, | Apr 14 2008 | LELY PATENT N.V. | Facilities for and method of separating and sorting livestock |
9320257, | Oct 24 2008 | LELY PATENT N.V. | Gate system to grant an animal access to a space |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5183008, | Feb 11 1991 | TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS CORP | Livestock sorting system having identification sensor and gate mounted exit switch |
GB2053343, | |||
WO8704898, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 03 1995 | LOHER, ULRICH | WESTFALIA SEPARATOR AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, A GERMAN CORPORATION | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 007591 | /0191 | |
May 11 1995 | Westfalia Separator Aktiengesellschaft | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jul 14 1997 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Jun 21 2000 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Jun 21 2000 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jul 01 2000 | RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned. |
Jul 08 2004 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jul 28 2008 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jan 21 2009 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Feb 16 2009 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jan 21 2000 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jul 21 2000 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 21 2001 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jan 21 2003 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jan 21 2004 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jul 21 2004 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 21 2005 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jan 21 2007 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jan 21 2008 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jul 21 2008 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 21 2009 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jan 21 2011 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |