In the proposed method of radio satellite localization of points on the surface of the earth:

a pseudolite transmitter (1) is placed on a masked point (P);

the antenna (3) of radio localization means (2) is placed successively in a plurality of arbitrary points (Pi) where reception of the signals transmitted by the satellite is satisfactory, and the phase of the signal transmitted by the pseudolite transmitter (1) and received by the antenna at said points is measured; and

the coordinates of the masked point (P) is determined as a function of said measurements and as a function of the coordinates of the points (Pi).

The apparatus includes a pseudolite transmitter (1) and a radio localization mobile receiver (2) having one of its channels allocated to receiving the signal (Sp) transmitted by the pseudolite transmitter (1).

Patent
   5757314
Priority
Jun 06 1995
Filed
Jun 06 1996
Issued
May 26 1998
Expiry
Jun 06 2016
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
25
9
all paid
8. Apparatus for radio satellite localization of points on a surface of the earth, the apparatus comprising:
a radio localization mobile receiver including both an antenna for receiving radio signals transmitted to the earth by a constellation of satellites, and a unit for processing said radio signals,
a pseudolite transmitter a masked point where the reception of radio signals emitted by the satellites is unsatisfactory,
one of the channels of the radio localization mobile receiver that is usually dedicated to receiving radio satellite signals being allocated to receiving a pseudolite signal transmitted by the pseudolite transmitter, processing means for enabling coordinates of the masked point to be determined as a function of a measured phase of the pseudolite signal transmitted by the pseudolite transmitter at various points where the antenna is successively positioned, and on the basis of the coordinates of said various points as determined by the unit.
1. A method of radio satellite localization of points on the surface of the earth to locate a masked point where a reception of signals transmitted by satellites is insufficient, the method comprising the steps of:
configuring an antenna of a radio localization mobile receiver to be freely movable in the vicinity of the masked point is positioned on a plurality of arbitrary points where the signals transmitted by the satellites are received satisfactorily;
placing a pseudolite transmitter at the masked point;
determining by radio localization at each of the arbitrary points where the mobile receiver antenna is successively positioned, coordinates of said arbitrary points, and measuring a phase of a pseudolite signal transmitted by the pseudolite transmitter and received at each of said arbitrary points by said antenna; and
determining coordinates of the masked point as a function of said chase measurements and as a function of the coordinates of said arbitrary points.
2. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the steps of:
determining parameters of a linear equation relating to the coordinates of the masked point and a phase shift between the pseudolite transmitter and the radio localization mobile receiver at a reference time for each arbitrary point where the antenna is successively positioned, said parameters being a function of the phase measurement of the pseudolite signal and of the coordinates of said arbitrary points; and
determining the coordinates of the masked point by solving a system of linear equations.
3. A method according to claim 2, wherein for an ith point where the antenna is successively positioned and i is an integer;
determining a relative phase slip ΔHj of a clock of the pseudolite transmitter and a clock of the processing unit of the radio localization mobile receiver that occurs between said ith arbitrary point and the preceding (i-1)th arbitrary point is determined;
computing a following phase value: ##EQU4## where Ri is the measured phase of the pseudolite signal at said ith arbitrary point, and relative slip values ΔHj relating to preceding points having been stored for this purpose; and
computing the parameters Ki, ai, bi, ci, and di of the following linear equation:
(1)R' i2 -R02 +Ki =aiX =biY +ciZ +diH0
where X, Y, and Z are coordinates of the masked point,
H0 is a phase shift between the pseudolite transmitter and the radio localization mobile receiver at the reference time,
ai, bi, ci and di are respectively equal to 2(Xi-X0), 2(Yi-Y0), 2(Zi-Z0), and 2(R' i-R0), where Xi, Yi, and Zi are coordinates of ith arbitrary point, X0, Y0, and Z0 are coordinates of the arbitrary point where the antenna is located at the reference time, R0 being the phase measurement of the pseudolite signal at the reference time, and where Ki is equal to X02 -Xi2 +Y02 -Yi2 +Z02 -Zi 2.
4. A method according to claim 3, wherein determining the relative slip between the clocks of the pseudolite transmitter and of the processing unit of the radio localization mobile receiver is performed by taking the difference between:
a clock slip between said processing unit and a reference beacon; and
a clock slip between said reference beacon and the pseudolite transmitter.
5. A method according to claim 4, wherein the clock slip is measured by the reference beacon and transmitted to the processing unit.
6. A method according to claim 4, wherein the clock slip is nullified by locking the pseudolite transmitter clock to the clock of the reference beacon, using a modulation of a carrier emitted by said reference beacon.
7. A method as defined in claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 further comprising the steps of:
performing a stability test on the successively determined values for the coordinates of the masked point, the stability test having a predetermined threshold that is a function of accuracy required for the successively determined values of the coordinates of said masked point; and
said radio localization of the coordinates of said arbitrary points being terminated when the successively determined values of the coordinates of said masked point have reached the predetermined threshold.
9. Apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the processing means comprises:
computing means for determining, for each point of the various points at which the antenna is successively positioned, the parameters of a linear equation relating the coordinates of the masked point and a phase shift between the pseudolite transmitter and the radio localization mobile receiver with respect to a reference time, said parameters being a function of the measured phase of the pseudolite signal and of the coordinates of the various points; and
computing means for solving the linear equations to determine the coordinates of the masked point.
10. Apparatus according to claim 9, further comprising:
means for determining the relative slip between a clock of the pseudolite transmitter and a clock of the unit of the radio localization mobile receiver between an ith point where the antenna is successively positioned and the preceding (i-l)th point;
means for computing the following phase value ##EQU5## where Ri is the measured phase of the pseudolite signal at said ith point with the value for relative slip relating to preceding points having been stored for this purpose; and
means for computing parameters Ki, ai, bi, ci, and di for the following linear equation
(1)R' i2 -R02 +Ki =aiX =biY +ciZ +diH0
where X, Y, and Z are the coordinates of the masked point,
H0 is a phase shift between the pseudolite transmitter (1) and the radio localization mobile receiver at the reference time,
ai, bi, ci and di are respectively equal to 2(Xi -X0), 2(Yi -Y0), 2(Zi -Z0), and 2(R'i -R0),
where Xi, Yi, and Zi are the coordinates of ith point, X0, Y0, and Z0 are the coordinates of the point where the antenna is located at the reference time, R0 being the phase measurement of the pseudolite signal at the reference time, and
where Ki is equal to X0 2 -Xi2 +Y02 -Yi2 +Zi2 -Zi 2.
11. Apparatus according to claim 10, wherein the means for determining relative slip between the clocks of the pseudolite transmitter and of the unit includes means for taking the difference between a clock slip between the unit and a reference beacon, and a clock slip between said reference beacon and the pseudolite transmitter.
12. Apparatus according to any one of the claims 8, 9, 10 or 11, further comprising:
means for testing the stability of the values successively determined for the coordinates of the masked point, the stability means having a predetermined threshold that is a function of accuracy required for the successively determined values of coordinates of the masked point; and
said radio localization of the coordinates of points being terminated when the successively determined values of coordinates of the masked have reached the predetermined threshold.

The present invention relates to methods and systems for satellite radio localization of points on the surface of the earth.

Over the last ten years, the use of radio signals transmitted by satellites has found a vast field of applications concerning navigation, geodesics, and topography.

Specifically, the global positioning system (GPS) is now used worldwide, and makes it possible to obtain, in real time, centimeter accuracy for determining the positions of points on the surface of the globe. Such great accuracy is essential for topographers in numerous terrestrial positioning applications.

The techniques implemented for reaching this result are said to be "real-time-kinematic" techniques. They have been used since 1993-94 and they are illustrated in particular in the Applicants' French patent filed under the number 94/00523.

For a general description of such techniques, reference may also be made to the following publication "GPS Vermessung mit Real-Time-Kinematic Technische Untersicht" [GPS surveying with the real-time-kinematic sighting technique], Verwendungen & Technische Angaben, B 1-7, Trimble, 1993.

With these techniques, it is possible, provided only that signals can be received simultaneously from at least five satellites, to produce high quality work and to achieve fixing accuracies of the order of one centimeter when measuring or setting points. Consequently, in numerous applications, satellite radio locating techniques have replaced earlier locating techniques that made use of optical instruments for measuring angles or distances (distance meters and tachymeters).

Nevertheless, some points on the ground are not always sufficiently clear or suitably situated to enable satellite signals to be received properly. This constitutes a brake on the development of satellite radio localization techniques, and in particular on their use by topographers for ordinary everyday work.

This limitation can clearly be seen when it applies to determining the position of a point that is under plant cover, or that is at the foot of a wall, or that is under a bridge or a hopper, and more generally, that is in an environment that is relatively unsuited to proper reception of satellite signals.

So far, the solution provided for this type of situation consists in determining, with all the required accuracy, the coordinates of one or more "intermediate" points situated in clear surroundings close to a masked target point, and then in using conventional techniques for measuring angles and distances (surveyors' chain, tachymeter, distance meter, etc.) to situate the target point relative to the intermediate points.

This combination of different techniques gives rise to a large amount of equipment, to procedures that are complex, and to considerable risks of error; in practice, it greatly limits the advantage of using satellite techniques, since in any event conventional techniques and the associated equipment remain essential in very many applications.

An object of the invention is to increase considerably the field in which radio satellite techniques can be applied. To this end, the invention provides a method and a system of radio localization based on using satellite signals, and enabling the accurate positions of masked points to be found even when reception of radio satellite signals at said points is impossible or inadequate.

According to the method of the invention:

the antenna of a radio localization mobile receiver capable of moving freely in the vicinity of the masked point is positioned on a plurality of arbitrary points where the signals transmitted by the satellites are received satisfactorily;

the coordinates of said points are determined by radio localization; and

the coordinates of the masked point are determined as a function of said coordinates;

the method being characterized in that, for this purpose,

a pseudolite transmitter is placed at the masked point;

at each of the points where the mobile receiver antenna is successively positioned, the phase of the signal transmitted by the pseudolite transmitter and received at said points by said antenna is measured; and

the coordinates of the masked point are determined as a function of said measurements and as a function of the coordinates of said points.

Thus, according to the invention, use is made of phase measurements of the signal transmitted by the pseudolite transmitter and of the satellite measurements enabling successive positions of the localizing mobile receiver to be computed, thereby enabling the coordinates of the masked point to be computed.

FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of the invention.

The term "pseudolite" or "pseudo-satellite" is used to mean a ground transmitter unit which transits encoded pseudo-random radio signals analogous to those emitted by satellites in the radio localization system used (satellites in the NAVSTAR constellation for GPS systems).

Pseudolites are conventionally known to the person skilled in the art.

They are mainly used in aviation for guiding aircraft relative to landing ground or for removing absolute phase ambiguities.

In this respect, reference may advantageously be made to the following patents: U.S. Pat. No. 5,177,489 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,311,194, and to the following publications:

Real time flight testing using integrity beacons for GPS, category III precision landing, Clark Cohen et al., Revue Navigation, Vol. 41, No. 2, Summer 94-Institute of Navigation; and

Integrity monitoring for precision approach using kinematic GPS and a ground-based pseudolite, Boris Pervan et al., Revue Navigation, Vol. 41, No. 2, Summer 94.

In particular, in an advantageous variant of the method of the invention:

for each point where the antenna is successively positioned, the parameters are determined of a linear equation relating the coordinates of the masked point and the phase shift between the pseudolite transmitter and the radio localization mobile receiver at a reference time, said parameters being a function of the phase measurement of the pseudolite signal and of the coordinates of said points; and

the coordinates of the masked point are determined by solving the system of linear equations obtained in this way.

The invention also provides apparatus including a pseudolite transmitter for placing at a point to be localized where reception of the signals transmitted by satellites is insufficient, one of the channels of the radio localization means that would normally be dedicated to receiving radio satellite signals, being allocated for receiving the signal transmitted by the pseudolite transmitter, said apparatus including processing means for determining the coordinates of the point to be localized as a function of measuring the phase of the signal transmitted by the pseudolite transmitter at various points where the antenna is successively positioned and as a function of the coordinates of said points as determined by the unit.

Other characteristics and advantages appear further from the following description. This description is purely illustrative and non-limiting. It should be read with reference to the sole accompanying figure which is a diagram showing the principle on which the method of the system of the invention is based.

The figure shows a masked point P whose coordinates are to be found, which point is situated in a sheltered zone ZC in which radio satellite signals S are not properly received.

The apparatus used for measuring the coordinates XYZ of the point P include a pseudolite transmitter 1 and a GPS radio localization mobile receiver 2.

The pseudolite 1 radiates at very low power (a few microwatts) at the GPS frequency of 1.57542 GHz (L1), or at a frequency slightly different therefrom, and its radiated signal SP is phase modulated by a pseudo-random code of the same format as GPS codes.

The mobile receiver 2 has a reception antenna 3 mounted on a pole held by the operator and a processing unit 4 carried by the operator and connected to said antenna 3.

The unit 4 processes the radio signals as received by the antenna 3 from GPS satellites, from the pseudolite 1, and from a reference beacon 5 which also receives the signals from the GPS satellites and which retransmits phase difference correction signals (signals SB in the figure).

As will have been understood, one of the channels of the radio localization mobile receiver 2 that is normally dedicated to receiving satellite radio signals is allocated to receiving the signal Sp transmitted by the pseudolite 1, such that a phase measurement which is a function of the distance between the pseudolite transmitter 1 and the mobile receiver as constituted by the mobile receiver 2 is made available to the processing unit 4.

The processing performed by the unit 4 on the GPS signals is kinematic processing in real time so that the position of the antenna is known with centimeter accuracy. Such processing may, for example, be processing of the type described in the French patent application filed by the present Applicants under the number 94/00523, to which reference may advantageously be made.

The operator moves the antenna 3 of the mobile receiver 2 over a succession of points Pi where the radio satellite signals S are suitably received.

At each of the various points Pi, the receiver 2 determines the coordinates Xi, Yi, and Zi of the point Pi at which it is located, and it performs a phase measurement Ri on the signal transmitted by the pseudolite 1 and received by the GPS receiver 2.

A knowledge of the coordinates of at least four points Pi and of the corresponding phase measurements Ri enables the unit 4 to determine the X, Y and Z coordinates of the point P.

The processing implemented for this purpose by the unit 4 is explained below.

At a point P0 of coordinates X0, Y0, and Z0, the phase measurement is:

R0 =D0 +H0

where D0 is a phase value proportional to the distance between the pseudolite 1 and the receiver 2 and where H0 is the phase difference between the clocks of the pseudolite 1 and of the receiver 2.

At a later time T1, the operator has moved to a point P1 of coordinates X1, Y1, and Z1, and the phase measurement performed by the receiver 2 is as follows:

R1 =D1 +H0 +ΔH1

where D1 is the new value of phase corresponding to the distance between the pseudolite 1 and the receiver 2, and where ΔH, is the relative slip between the clocks of the receiver 2 and of the pseudolite 1 that has occurred between times T0 and T1.

At a time T2, the operator has moved to a point P2 of coordinates X2, Y2, and Z2. The phase measurement performed is as follows:

R2 =D2 +ΔH0 +H1 +ΔH2

where D2 is the phase corresponding to the distance between the receiver 2 at said point P2 and the pseudolite 1, and

where ΔH2 is the relative slip between the clocks of the receiver 2 and the pseudolite 1 that has occurred between times T1 and T2.

The operator continues to perform measurements at a plurality of points Pi with the phase measurement at any given point Pi being as follows: ##EQU1## where Di is the phase corresponding to the distance between the receiver 2 at point Pi and the pseudolite 1, and

where ΔHi is the relative slip between the clocks of the receiver 2 and of the pseudolite 1 that has occurred between Ti-1 and Ti.

The slip values AHi are computed by the unit 4 by taking the difference between the slip ΔHi(2-5) between the receiver 2 and the beacon 5 and the slip ΔHi(5-1) between the beacon 5 and the pseudolite 1.

The slip value ΔHi(2-5) is computed by the unit 4 and is a by-product of determining the coordinates of point Pi.

The second slip value (ΔHi(5-1)) can be determined by two ways :

if the correction beacon 5 is installed in sight of the pseudolite 1, a special channel can be allocated thereto in the same manner as channel allocation for the receiver 2, thereby enabling it to receive signals transmitted by the pseudolite 1. The distance between the beacon 5 and the pseudolite 1 being constant, the phase slip measured by the beacon 5 in the signal emitted by the pseudolite 1 corresponds to relative slip between the clocks of the beacon 5 and the pseudolite 1. This information is sent by the beacon 5 to the receiver 2 ;

if beacon 5 is out of sight of a pseudolite 1, the solution is to lock the slip of the clock of pseudolite 1 on the clock of the beacon 5. Thus, the values ΔHi(2-5) are all equal to 0 and ΔHi(1-2)=ΔHi(1-5).

Being in the vicinity of the mobile receiver 2, the pseudolite 1 receives the emitted signals of beacon 5 in the same way as the mobile receiver 2. Therefore, to lock the two clock slips on each other, one can modulate the carrier emitted by beacon 5 on a frequency which is a submultiple of its clock, the pseudolite 1 being provided with means for the receiving and the decoding of this information. The techniques for the locking of a clock on another by an hertzian link are well known from the man skilled in the art.

Each of the two here-above exposed solutions presents its own advantages. The first of these two solutions is rigorous but requires the setting of the beacon 5 in the sight of the pseudolite 1, which represents an operational constraint. With the second of these two solutions, the operator is not constraint, but the preciseness is slightly degradated, the degradation being function of the quality of the locking.

Whatever solution is chosen, the unit 4 stores the successive slip values ΔHj and, for each point Pi (ith point), it computes a phase value Ri given by: ##EQU2## i.e.:

R'i =Di +H0

This value R'i satisfies the following linear equation:

R'i2 -R02 +Ki=aiX+biY+ciZ+diH0 (1)

where:

ai, bi, ci, di and Ki are parameters computed by the unit 4 and which are a function of the coordinates of the points Pi and P0.

Between Ti and T0 the following applies:

Di2 -D02 +X02 -Xi2 +Y02 -Yi2 +Z02 -Zi2 =2(Xi -X0)X+2(Yi -Y0)Y+2(Zi +Z0)Z

and the following also applies: ##EQU3##

This is the same as equation (1) with ai, bi, ci, and di respectively equal to:

2(Xi -X0), 2(Yi -YO), 2(Zi -Z0), and 2(R'i -R0)

Ki being equal to X02 -Xi2 +Y02 -Yi2 +Z02 -Zi2

As will be understood, equation (1) is a linear expression in X, Y, Z, and H0 which can be solved once measurements are available for four points Pi different from the point P0.

In practice, the least squares method is used and a stability test is applied to the successively determined values X, Y, and Z for a single point P, with measurements stopping when the stability of the values for the coordinates X, Y, and Z is satisfactory.

For example, the solution obtained is accepted when the noise on the three unknowns X, Y, and Z is less than a threshold that is predetermined as a function of the accuracy required for the work to be performed (in practice 1 cm to a few cm).

The time required for convergence of the solution is a function of the observation geometry of the pseudolite and it lies in the range 1 minute to a few minutes.

As will have been understood, the method and the apparatus described above enable the position of a point where satellite signals cannot be received to be determined without using techniques other than those of radio localization.

All of the measurements are performed at a single point (i.e. the phase center of the antenna 3), thereby eliminating problems of matching measurements coming from different systems or sensors.

It will be observed that the processing described above is performed on the basis of observations concerning variation in the phase of received signals, and not on the phase proper of those signals, thereby eliminating problems associated with determining phase absolutely.

Operationally, the method and the system of the invention have numerous advantages.

The target point can be determined while the mobile receiver is moving freely, without any constraints on initial positioning or on relay points.

The coordinates of the target point can be determined simultaneously with measuring or fixing being performed conventionally at other points.

The method can be activated or interrupted without disturbing normal operation of real time kinematic observation of said points.

The connection between the pseudolite transmitter and the mobile receiver can be temporarily interrupted, e.g. by masking, without that having any consequence on the quality of the result.

The system accumulates and processes the time measurements required for obtaining a result in application of accuracy criteria which have previously been determined by the operator.

Once the required quality has been obtained, computation is terminated automatically and the operator is informed by the unit 4.

It may also be observed that the system proposed by the invention is very simple to handle: apart from installing the pseudolite transmitter, no other manipulation is required.

Gounon, Rene-Pierre, Priou, Michel-Francis

Patent Priority Assignee Title
6100842, Feb 20 1998 Trimble Navigation Limited Chained location determination system
6101178, Jul 10 1997 SKYHOOK HOLDING, INC Pseudolite-augmented GPS for locating wireless telephones
6771625, Jul 10 1997 SKYHOOK HOLDING, INC Pseudolite-augmented GPS for locating wireless telephones
7099796, Oct 22 2001 Honeywell International Inc. Multi-sensor information fusion technique
7205939, Jul 30 2004 Trimble Navigation Limited Land-based transmitter position determination
7271766, Jul 30 2004 Trimble Navigation Limited Satellite and local system position determination
7315278, Jul 30 2004 Trimble Navigation Limited Multiple frequency antenna structures and methods for receiving navigation or ranging signals
7339524, Jul 30 2004 Trimble Navigation Limited Analog decorrelation of ranging signals
7339525, Jul 30 2004 Trimble Navigation Limited Land-based local ranging signal methods and systems
7339526, Jul 30 2004 Trimble Navigation Limited Synchronizing ranging signals in an asynchronous ranging or position system
7342538, Jul 30 2004 Trimble Navigation Limited Asynchronous local position determination system and method
7345627, Jul 30 2004 Trimble Navigation Limited Land-based local ranging signal methods and systems
7382318, Jul 30 2004 Trimble Navigation Limited Land-based local ranging signal methods and systems
7385554, Jul 30 2004 Trimble Navigation Limited Satellite and local system position determination
7532160, Jul 30 2004 Trimble Navigation Limited Distributed radio frequency ranging signal receiver for navigation or position determination
7612716, Mar 05 1999 Harris Corporation Correlation of flight track data with other data sources
7667647, Mar 05 1999 SRA INTERNATIONAL, INC Extension of aircraft tracking and positive identification from movement areas into non-movement areas
7739167, Mar 05 1999 SRA INTERNATIONAL, INC Automated management of airport revenues
7889133, Mar 05 1999 Harris Corporation Multilateration enhancements for noise and operations management
7965227, May 08 2006 ERA A S Aircraft tracking using low cost tagging as a discriminator
8072382, Mar 05 1999 ERA A S Method and apparatus for ADS-B validation, active and passive multilateration, and elliptical surveillance
8203486, Mar 05 1999 ERA SYSTEMS, LLC Transmitter independent techniques to extend the performance of passive coherent location
8446321, Mar 05 1999 ERA A S Deployable intelligence and tracking system for homeland security and search and rescue
8983685, Jul 30 2010 Deere & Company System and method for moving-base RTK measurements
9772185, Apr 14 2011 HEXAGON TECHNOLOGY CENTER GMBH Measuring system and method for determining new points
Patent Priority Assignee Title
5153598, Sep 26 1991 Global Positioning System telecommand link
5379045, Sep 01 1993 Trimble Navigation Limited SATPS mapping with angle orientation calibrator
5452211, Aug 10 1992 Caterpillar Inc. Method and system for determining vehicle position
5572218, Mar 24 1993 IntegriNautics System and method for generating precise position determinations
EP420338,
EP481307,
EP588598,
WO9000718,
WO9000719,
////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jun 06 1996Dassault Sercel Navigation-Positionnement(assignment on the face of the patent)
Jul 15 1996GOUNON, RENE-PIERREDassault Sercel Navigation-PositionnementASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0081590648 pdf
Jul 15 1996PRIOU, MICHEL-FRANCISDassault Sercel Navigation-PositionnementASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0081590648 pdf
Dec 21 2000DASSAULT SERCEL NAVIGATION POSITIONNEMENTTHALES NAVIGATION S A CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0202270440 pdf
Aug 23 2006THALES NAVIGATION S A MAGELLAN NAVIGATION S A CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0202270445 pdf
Dec 20 2006MAGELLAN NAVIGATION S A MAGELLAN NAVIGATION S A S CONVERSION OF A SOCIETE ANONYME TO A SOCIETE PAR ACTIONS SIMPLIFIEE0206380158 pdf
Jan 01 2010MAGELLAN NAVIGATION S A S ASHTECH S A S CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0252170501 pdf
Nov 12 2010ASHTECH S A S Mitac International CorpASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0256640368 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jun 22 2001ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Nov 21 2001M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Nov 04 2005M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Oct 28 2009M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
May 26 20014 years fee payment window open
Nov 26 20016 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 26 2002patent expiry (for year 4)
May 26 20042 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
May 26 20058 years fee payment window open
Nov 26 20056 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 26 2006patent expiry (for year 8)
May 26 20082 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
May 26 200912 years fee payment window open
Nov 26 20096 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 26 2010patent expiry (for year 12)
May 26 20122 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)