In a medical X-ray diagnostic installation and a method for operating same, an X-ray source has a filter means optionally introducible into its beam path and emits X-rays which strike a detector having individual pixel elements and which generates image signals pixel-by-pixel dependent on the received radiation. The detector is followed by a signal processing chain which includes processing meansfor image generation and output, first and only image exposure of the examination subject initially ensues without the filter means introduced into the beam path, after which the image signals obtained from one or more picture element regions of the received image are processed pixel-by-pixel for generating a calculated image corresponding to the image of those regions which would be obtained with the filter means in the beam path, using signals which identify a position of the filter means in the beam path. The processed signals are combined with the unprocessed signals for the remainder of the original image to produce a calculated image, which is supplied as an output for display. The production of a second, actual exposure employing X-rays with the filter means in the beam path is thus avoided, thereby saving time and reducing the patient's overall X-ray dose.
|
12. An X-ray diagnostic installation comprising:
an X-ray source which emits X-rays along a beam path; filter means selectively introducible into said beam path; an X-ray detector on which said X-ray are incident, said X-ray detector comprising a plurality of pixels and generating image signals pixel-by-pixel dependent on X-rays incident on the respective pixels; processing means for processing said image signals to produce a visible image; means for activating said X-ray source in a first exposure, said detector producing image signals during said first exposure; and said processing means comprising means for processing image signals for pixels of said detector effected by said filter means in said beam path for producing a calculated image comprising the process image data signals and the image signals from a remainder of said pixels not effected by said filter means in said beam path.
1. A method for operating a medical X-ray diagnostic installation having an X-ray source which emits an X-ray beam in a beam path, filter means introducible into said beam path, a detector, comprised of a plurality of pixels, which receives said X-ray beam and which emits pixel-by-pixel image signals dependent on incident X-rays, and means for processing the image signals, said method comprising the steps of:
activating said X-ray source to emit said X-ray beam in a first image exposure without said filter means introduced into said beam path, said detector producing image signals during said first exposure; defining one or more pixel areas of said detector identified by the position of said filter means relative to said detector, when said filter means is placed in said beam path for a second exposure; processing the said produced pixel-by-pixel image signals of said one or more pixel areas of said detector which will be effected by said filter means in said beam path without re-activating said X-ray source; and generating a calculated image from the said processed image signals for said pixels effected by said filter means and the image signals of a remainder of said pixels which are unaffected by said filter means.
2. A method as claimed in
3. A method as claimed in
4. A method as claimed in
5. A method as claimed in
obtaining an apparatus component-specific parameter of at least one of said apparatus components; and employing said at least one apparatus-specific component in the processing of said image signals of said pixels effected by said filter means.
6. A method as claimed in
7. A method as claimed in
for each pixel, calculating a correction value from the image signal obtained during said first image exposure; using said correction value, computationally operating on the image signal from which said correction value was obtained to produce a computational result; and for each pixel, using said computational result in said calculated image.
8. A method as claimed in
9. A method as claimed in
obtaining filter-specific data identifying a parameter associated with said filter means; obtaining apparatus component-specific data identifying a parameter of one of said apparatus components; calculating a first attenuation value dependent on said filter-specific data; calculating a second attenuation value dependent on said apparatus-specific data; and calculating said correction value by multiplying said first attenuation value with said second attenuation value.
10. A method as claimed in
11. A method as claimed in
13. An X-ray diagnostic installation as claimed in
14. An X-ray diagnostic installation as claimed in
15. An X-ray diagnostic installation as claimed in
16. An X-ray diagnostic installation as claimed in
17. An X-ray diagnostic installation as claimed in
18. An X-ray diagnostic installation as claimed in
19. An X-ray diagnostic installation as claimed in
|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed to a medical X-ray diagnostics installation and a method for operating same, the installation being of the type having an X-ray source, with a filter optionally introducible into the beam path, and a detector that receives the X-radiation having individual picture elements and which supplies image signals pixel-by-pixel dependent on the received radiation, and a computer for image generation and output.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The exposure of an X-ray image usually ensues by first making a fluoroscopic exposure of the examination subject in order to obtain information in view of, among other things, the illumination distribution of the X-ray exposure. If it turns out that regions of excessively great illumination exist within the exposure, which can be the case due to subject locations of different density and thus different absorbency, then these can be largely eliminated by introducing a corresponding filter, for example a wedge filter or a graduated filter, into the beam path. The radiation dose applied to the subject in this region, and thus the dose ultimately reaching the detector as well thus being reduced, i.e. filtered. The positioning of the filter, for example semi-transparent diaphragm lamellae, is thereby manually carried out by the operator, who inserts the filter into the beam path in conformity with the knowledge about the over-irradiated regions. A further fluoroscopic exposure is required in order to know the correct position of the filter and its filtering effect and in order to decide whether the positioning is adequate, i.e. another radiation image must be registered. This, however, is extremely disadvantageous, particularly since the patient must be exposed to a radiation dose again. Further, the implementation of the second fluoroscopic exposure is disadvantageous for the overall examination sequence itself, particularly in view of time.
PCT Application 84/04878 A1 discloses a method as well as an apparatus for the production of filters that are subsequently introduced into the beam path. The production ensues such that a filter is arranged in the beam path in the framework of a first fluoroscopic exposure. Dependent on the transmission signals identified with a pick-up unit, a filter material is then deposited on the filter with an appropriate device. After the production of this filter, it is subsequently placed into the beam path, after which the actual second exposure ensues.
An object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus which, given adequate knowledge of the effect of the filter on a radiation exposure, enable a minimization of the applied radiation dose and an acceleration of the examination sequence.
This object is achieved in a method and apparatus of the invention wherein a first and only image exposure of the examination subject initially ensues without a filter introduced into the beam path. After this single exposure, information identifying a position of the filter in the beam path is supplied to a computer and image signals for those pixels which will be covered when the filter is introduced into the beam path are processed pixel-by-pixel in the computer and a calculated image is generated from these processed signals and from the remainder of the image signals in the single exposure, which will not be effected by the introduction of the filter into the beam path. The calculated image thus represents the same type of image which is produced in the aforementioned conventional systems, with the filter introduced into the beam path, but there is no necessity to again activate the x-ray source in order to produce the calculated image.
With particular advantage, thus, the inventive method creates the possibility of pre-calculating the image which would be obtained if the second conventional fluoroscopic exposure were made, i.e. it is possible for the physician to obtain knowledge about the position and the effect of the filter which will be introduced into the beam path, without actually implementing a second radiation exposure. In this way, only the implementation of a single (i.e. the first) fluoroscopic exposure is required; a second exposure is no longer required for obtaining knowledge of the filtering effect. The X-ray dose applied to the patient is thus advantageously considerably reduced and the examination sequence is significantly accelerated.
It has proven especially expedient from a processing-oriented point of view to process the gray scale values of the respective picture elements in the framework of the overall signal processing. The processing expediently ensues dependent on specific filter data which may relate to one or more parameters of one or more apparatus components, the number of filters, the geometry of the filter and/or the absorption properties of the filter. The parameters may be normed (normalized) to a reference material thickness dependent, for example, on the X-ray tube voltage. All specific filter data ultimately influence the nature of the filtering as well as the image regions covered by the filter are employed and within the signal processing so that knowledge and incorporation of these influences in the processing leads to adequately exact and diagnostically relevant calculated images. In addition to the specific filter data, the processing can ensue dependent on specific parameters of at least one apparatus component, the generator-side tube operating voltage with which the first radiation image was exposed being particularly relevant. Further, taking specific parameters of all image-generating and output components into consideration is meaningful since these also ultimately enter into the image shown at the respective output means, i.e. processing-specific parameters are to be taken into consideration. The voltage of the X-ray source selected in the framework of the first image exposure and/or specific parameters of the components following the X-ray apparatus can be inventively employed as such specific parameters. Expediently, all component-specific or filter specific parameters are stored in the form of a table, from which the respective parameters are selected for a given situation.
From a processing-oriented point of view, it has proven expedient in the framework of the signal processing, for example of the gray scale values, to first determine correction value based on the signal obtained in the framework of the first exposure and to subsequently computationally operated on this value with the obtained signal, particularly subtracted therefrom, for generating the signal employed in the calculated image. For example in the case of the gray scale value processing, a gray scale attenuation value is identified that is then subtracted from the actual initial value in order to obtain the calculated image value. The correction value itself can be inventively determined by computational operation, particularly multiplication, of an attenuation value determined dependent on the specific filter means data and an attenuation value determined dependent on the apparatus component, the specific attenuation value for the apparatus component is preferably a multiplication coefficient.
As already set forth, a pre-calculation of an anticipated X-ray image is possible with the inventive method. In an embodiment of the inventive method and apparatus the position of the filter is continuously acquired, and the calculated image is generated dependent on the position or on a change in position. It is thus possible in this embodiment to already define the region within which the processing should ensue by automatic acquisition of the filter position, so that completely automatic operation is achieved. An "on-line" operation that leads to a continuous generation and output of the calculated image can also be enabled with this embodiment for generating a calculated image given a change in the filter position. When the operator readjusts and displaces the filter, for example after output of a first calculated image, then the change in position of the filter is automatically acquired according to this inventive embodiment and a second calculated image is subsequently produced so that the operator can immediately see the effect of the manual modification, for example at the monitor. An "on-line" simulation of the X-ray image is thus possible.
The inventive method X-ray diagnostics installation for implementation of the above-described method includes an X-ray source, with a filter optionally introducible into its beam path, a detector that receives the X-radiation, having individual picture elements and which produces image signals pixel-by-pixel dependent on the received radiation, and a computer for image generation and output of the image to an output device, such as a display. The computer generates the aforementioned calculated image that corresponds to an image as would be expected if a further image exposure with the filter introduced in the beam path were made. The calculated image is based on the signals obtained without the filter in a first (and only) image exposure of the examination subject.
An arrangement can be provided for acquiring the position of the filter, with the computer generating the calculated image dependent on this position data. The computer can undertake generation of the calculated image dependent on specific filter data, particularly the number of filters, the geometry of the filter, the material of the filter and/or the absorption properties of the filter. Moreover, the computer can generate the calculated image dependent on specific parameters of at least one apparatus component, particularly the voltage of the X-ray source, selected in the framework of the first image exposure, and/or dependent on specific parameters of the components following the detector. In this way, it is possible to virtually take all parameters entering into the attenuation and processing of the respective signals into consideration in the generation of the calculated image.
In an embodiment of the invention the acquisition of the position of the filter can be done continuously, and that the computer then can generate the calculated image dependent on a change of the position data in order to enable a continuous display of the calculated image, and thus a tracking of the result which occurs due to a positional change of the filter. Since a computational transition from the signals of the first image exposure ensues to the calculated signals, a modification of the filter position in this "on-line" image generating mode would result in the original signals (before the change in filter position) being lost. Therefore, a memory for the signals obtained in the first image exposure is provided in order to be able to have been able to retrieve these signals in the calculation of a further calculated image. This allows the original signals (for the regions that are no longer covered by the filter in its changed position) to be used in the new calculated image. These original signals would otherwise have to be generated by a back-calculation.
The single FIGURE is a block diagram of an X-ray diagnostic installation constructed and operating in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
The FIGURE shows an inventive X-ray diagnostic installation for the implementation of the inventive method. An X-ray source 2 driven via a high-voltage generator 1 and emits an X-ray beam 3 that penetrates a subject 4 and strikes a detector 5, for example a matrix detector or an image intensifier. The detector 5 is followed by a signal processing chain including a computer 6 for image generation and output and a display 7, for example a monitor. A filter arrangement 8 that effect a pre-filtering of the X-rays is arranged in the X-ray beam of the X-ray source 2. The filter arrangement 8 can, for example, be one or more wedge filters. A number of such filters can be provided in the filter arrangement 8 in order to allow an optimally exact matching to the current conditions.
For implementing the inventive method, the X-ray diagnostic installation first is operated to produce a fluoroscopic exposure, the subject 4 being transirradiated with low-dose X-radiation during the course thereof in order to obtain information about the positioning of the subject 4 and about the exposure quality on the basis of the exposure. The X-rays attenuated by the subject 4 strike the detector 5 and are converted therein into radiation-dependent signals that are supplied to the computer 6. This computer 6 contains (or has access to) a memory 9 in which the signals obtained during the course of the first exposure are stored. After processing the supplied signals in the computer 6, the fluoroscopic image is supplied as an output to the display 7.
With reference to the output fluoroscopic image, the operator can now determine whether there are over-exposure regions that are to be compensated with the filter arrangement 8. When this is the case, the filter arrangement 8 is placed into the beam path 3 dependent on the position of the over-exposure regions recognizable at the display 7. A position sensor 10 for recognizing the position of the filter arrangement 8 are allocated to the filter arrangement 8, the position of the filter arrangement 8 relative to the detector 7, and thus relative to the image visible at the display 7, being automatically determined therewith. The introduction of the filter arrangement 8 thereby occurs without the production of X-rays. In order to then generate the fluoroscopic image which would (will) exist after introduction of the filter arrangement 8, a number of processing parameters are supplied to the computer 6, particularly the operating parameters of the high-voltage generator 1 that serve as criterion for the quality of the emitted X-radiation. Further, the position data of the filter arrangement 8 identified by the position sensor 10 are supplied to the computer 6, (arrow b).
Two tables T1 and T2 that are accessible by the computer 6 (arrows c, d) are also allocated to the computer 6. The table T1 contains absorption values of the filters of the filter arrangement 8 dependent on the operating voltage of the X-ray source 2. This makes it possible to determine the appertaining absorption value for every source operating voltage. This absorption value is specific to each filter, i.e. it takes into account the required filter data such as, for example, the material of the filter, the geometry of the filter, etc. By contrast, correction values, that serve for taking signal variations and fluctuations which occur within the computer 6 into consideration, are stored in table T2. Dependent on the nature of the computer 6 and of the display 7 employed, of course, different influences on the signal processing occur that in turn influence the respective signals which are produced.
The calculation of the expected image with the filter arrangement in the X-ray beam ensues pixel-by-pixel. Only the picture elements that are "affected" by the filter arrangement 8, i.e. whose signal would change if a further fluoroscopic exposure were made with the filter arrangement 8 in the beam path 3, are taken into consideration in the processing. These picture elements are known from the knowledge of the position of the filter arrangement 8 obtained from the position sensor 10. These picture elements are now calculated as follows in terms of their gray scale values, this calculation ensuing for every individual picture element:
First, the calculation of the filter attenuation SImage ensues in two steps:
1. Attenuation of the detector entry dose SDose :
SDose =value from absorption table T1 dependent on the source voltage.
2. Attenuation of the gray scale value SImage :
SImage =SDose ×correction value from table T2.
The image attenuation SImage obtained in this way is subsequently subtracted from the respective gray scale value in order to obtain the calculated gray scale value:
GCalculate =GTransirradiation -SImage
The calculation for the next picture element ensues after determination of the calculated gray scale value GCalculate until all picture elements in the overexposed region are processed. Subsequently, the computational gray scale values are operated on the other, non-processed gray scale values of the regions that are not overexposed (and thus not covered by the filter arrangement 8) in order to obtain the overall calculated image, which is subsequently supplied as an output. With reference thereto, the operator can then recognize and if necessary correct the pre-filtering which ensues due to the manual introduction of the filter arrangement 8. When such a correction is required, then the filter arrangement 8 is correspondingly shifted, and a new generation of the calculated image ensues due to the renewed position acquisition. In this case, the computer 6 accesses the first fluoroscopic image signals stored in the memory 9 and produces the new calculated image based thereon.
Although various minor modifications might be suggested by those skilled in the art, it should be understood that I wish to embody within the scope of the patent warranted hereon all such modifications as reasonably and properly come with the scope of my contribution to the art.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10925569, | Mar 30 2016 | SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG | Device and method for creating a panoramic x-ray recording using a first semi-transparent x-ray screen and a second semi-transparent x-ray screen |
11064958, | Jan 25 2017 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | X-ray imaging apparatus and control method thereof |
6182913, | Jan 25 1999 | Interface, Inc. | Method and apparatus for reclaiming carpet components |
6263044, | Dec 08 1998 | U S PHILIPS CORPORATION | X-ray examination apparatus having an object absorption dependent brightness control |
6611578, | Dec 27 2000 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V | X-ray examination apparatus |
6650930, | Oct 20 2000 | BEST THERATRONICS, LTD | Computer assisted radiotherapy dosimeter system and a method therefor |
6920203, | Dec 02 2002 | General Electric Company | Method and apparatus for selectively attenuating a radiation source |
7072447, | Nov 08 2001 | Siemens Healthcare GmbH | Device for filtering an x-ray beam |
8605861, | Jun 05 2009 | Siemens Healthcare GmbH | System for medical image display and image filter selection |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4497062, | Jun 06 1983 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Digitally controlled X-ray beam attenuation method and apparatus |
5663998, | Aug 29 1995 | J. Morita Manufacturing Corporation | X-ray imaging apparatus and automatic density correction method |
5680435, | Sep 22 1995 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | X-ray diagnostic apparatus with a filter device |
WO8404878, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 02 1998 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Apr 01 1998 | SOUKAL, PETER | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 009150 | /0023 | |
Jun 10 2016 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Siemens Healthcare GmbH | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 039271 | /0561 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Dec 11 2002 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jan 11 2003 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Dec 12 2006 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Dec 07 2010 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jul 13 2002 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jan 13 2003 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 13 2003 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jul 13 2005 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jul 13 2006 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jan 13 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 13 2007 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jul 13 2009 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jul 13 2010 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jan 13 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 13 2011 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jul 13 2013 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |