The present invention is directed to a process comprised of a controllably variable liquid quenching means for metal alloys at or above the Leidenfrost temperature without metal alloy distortion.
|
1. A process for the manufacture of a metal alloy wherein said metal alloy is subjected to a heat treatment and then is cooled with a controllably variable liquid quenching means to rapidly cool the metal alloy at or above the Leidenfrost temperature for said metal alloy, and then is cooled with an air quenching means, whereby said metal alloy is quenched without metal alloy distortion providing a metal with superior tensile strength properties.
2. The process of
5. The process of
7. The process of
9. The process of
11. The process of
12. The process of
13. The process of
14. The process of
15. The process of
16. The process of
18. The process of
|
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Applilcation No. 60/041,540 filed Mar. 25, 1997.
The present invention is directed to a process and the product of that process wherein a quenching means is employed that is controllably variable and provides a metal alloy with increased strength imparted to the alloy during finishing of the alloy manufacture. The quenching means is through the use of a liquid after the alloy has been worked and/or heat treated, followed by an air quench.
It is well known by those skilled in the metal alloy art that working and/or heating an alloy, and subsequently following that worked and/or heated alloy with a quenching step, may impart enhanced properties. A problem in the manufacture of thinner sheet alloy is that quenching a thin sheet alloy can cause multi-directional thermal distortion in the final product. What was a flat unwavering product becomes a bent, uneven, and/or physically distorted sheet alloy. While this problem is particularly troublesome in the thin sheet alloy art, it is also a problem in the forged and cast alloy art.
Heat treatable alloys contain soluble alloying constituents in amounts which exceed their room temperature solubility limits. The solution heat treating process involves heating the alloy to a sufficient temperature to permit desired constituents to go into solid solution. The resultant supersaturated solid solution can be sustained at room temperature if cooled or quenched rapidly enough to prevent precipitation. Constituents in an alloy system mean those minor metal components in the alloy that can have a significant impact on properties if present in the right place in the alloy and in the right amount. Room temperature mechanical and physical properties can depend on the extent to which the alloy constituents remain in solid solution.
Elevated temperature quenching can also result in undesirable physical distortion of the metal strand due to thermal contraction of the alloy. A strand can be sheet, slab, extrusion or other worked and/or heat treated metal alloy based in an iron, magnesium, titanium, and/or aluminum system, preferably aluminum alloy. In a continuous or semi-continuous process, the magnitude of distortion is proportional to the rate the strand is cooled. Achieving desirable mechanical properties by solution heat treatment followed by a quenching step then involves competing interests between enhanced mechanical properties and thermally induced physical distortion.
The present invention is useful for the high speed manufacture of metal alloys with higher strength values. These alloys may then be used to make articles of manufacture.
A process for the manufacture of metal alloys wherein a controllably variable liquid quenching means is used to rapidly cool the metal alloy at or above the Leidenfrost temperature prior to and in combination with an air quenching means and alter heat treatment whereby the metal alloy is quenched without metal alloy distortion providing a metal alloy with superior tensile strength properties. The process is comprised of finishing metal alloy on a horizontal bed, translation of said metal alloy sequentially through a solution heat treating furnace, a liquid quench chamber with a single and/or a plurality of controllably variable spray orifices, followed by a gas quench chamber. The spray orifices create a spray or mist in order to wet the metal alloy. While the preferred finishing bed is on a horizontal translation, the underlying invention is not planar dependent in the horizontal direction and embraces all directional translations, such as vertically. The invention hereof is specifically directed to the effective length of the liquid quench chamber, the enablement of which is the use of multiple zones of liquid flow through orifices. By zones it is meant an area within the liquid quench chamber whereby a plurality of separate orifices may be individually controlled within the liquid quench chamber. The number of zones and/or the time spent in a zone for a metal alloy, preferably aluminum alloy, may be controlled in consideration of the composition of the alloy being processed, the size of the strand, the speed of the translation and the liquid treatment or application means operating parameters, such as orifice type, pressure, the physical properties of the liquid, and flow rate. The gas is preferably air; however, any inert or benign gas will be sufficient to cool the strand.
The desired cooling rate is also dependent upon the kinetics of precipitation. The kinetic rate is temperature and solute dependent. The kinetic rate constant is temperature dependent. The rate constant is nearly zero at high and low temperatures. Accordingly, the loss of strength associated with a loss of solute from solution approaches zero at these high and low temperatures. For temperatures in a certain regime, near what is called the critical temperature, the kinetic constant is of sufficient magnitude to effect losses of solute from solution and lead to decreased strength potential in the alloy. The importance of the quench is to minimize the loss of solute from the solution. Therefore, an understanding of the cooling rates, particularly in the critical temperature range, provides insight into how the cooling rate can be maximized. To determine how to vary the controllable or tunable quench, it is important to know the temperature regime near the critical temperature. The rapid cooling of metals leads to undesirable residual stresses and distortion in the metal alloy. Increased cooling rates are accompanied by increases in thermally induced stresses. If these stresses occur at elevated strand temperatures, they can become permanent plastic deformations in the alloy. Thermally induced residual stress and physical distortion can be minimized by reducing product cooling rates. Distortion is also influenced by the thickness of the metal alloy which may be within a range of 0.01 to 8 inches thick. The thicker or metal alloy slabs will be less sensitive to the distortion than the thinner strips or slabs.
The challenge is to provide cooling rates which are sufficiently high to retain solute in solid solution but not in excess of those which lead to permanent plastic distortion. The magic of the present invention is the advantage that is taken by spraying liquid, preferably water, onto the surfaces of the metal alloy at elevated temperatures. Other liquids, such as water/glycol combinations or other organic liquids such as alcohols may be used if they have the appropriate sprayability and viscosity to exit the orifices and quench the strand. Additionally, dissolved gases such as CO2 may be used in the liquid coolant. The liquid quench cools the metal through the critical temperature at a rate that can be controllably varied from each metal alloy composition and can increase or at least maintain the strength potential of the alloy without physical distortion. Heretofore, the air quench was believed to provide the highest strength characteristics with minimum metal alloy distortion.
For the cooling of continuous and/or semi-continuous strands or metal alloy, the present invention makes use of an array of zoned water flow-through spray orifices in order to control the time which the strand remains above the critical temperature. While the inventors hereof do not want to be held to any particular theory of operability of the present invention, some theory may aid in the understanding of these teachings for those skilled in this art. The heat flux of a heat treated strand can undergo a rapid order of magnitude increase as the alloy is cooled below the temperature TL known as the Leidenfrost temperature, which may be between about 350°C to 700°C F., depending upon the metal alloy. Above TL, the alloy is blanketed by a vapor film which limits the heat removal. When the temperature drops below TL, the vapor film breaks down, the surface is wetted by the water droplets, and the heat flux can increase dramatically. TL is functionally and operatively related to the specific spray orifice, flow rate, physical and chemical properties of the liquid, and pressure used to apply the liquid, the liquid preferably being water. TL is also related to the momentum of the droplets which contact the strand surface. Droplet momentum can be increased by increasing droplet size or increasing its impact velocity. High momentum droplets more easily penetrate the vapor film, thereby increasing TL. For a given liquid, spray orifice or nozzle configuration, flow rate, and pressure, TL is constant.
Important for the operability of the present invention is the operation of the water quench mechanism in order to maximize the time the strand remains above TL. Maintaining the temperature above TL delays the rapid increase in the cooling rate until the strand is sufficiently rigid to resist plastic distortion. Contemplated within the reach of the present invention is that for certain alloys and/or strand sizes, the desired mechanical properties can be achieved by operating the water quench exclusively above TL. For certain alloys and strand sizes, no liquid cooling is required, and sufficient strengths can be achieved by gas cooling.
Aluminum alloys, especially those heat treatable alloys of the 6XXX, 2XXX, and 7XXX series known also as the 6000, 2000, and 7000 series aluminum alloys, preferably Aluminum Association registered alloys, 2008, 6022, and 6111, are particularly advantaged by the use of liquid quenching followed by a gas, preferably air, quench.
With reference to
In the practice of the present invention, it is important to understand some of the properties of the strand or alloy that is to be heat treated and quenched. For example, it is preferred to maximize the time the strand remains above the temperature TL. This residence time above TL delays the rapid increase in cooling rate until the strand is sufficiently strong to resist plastic distortion. It is contemplated within the metes and bounds of the present invention that cooling partially above TL and partially below TL will provide an advantage by the liquid quenching step.
The TL or Leidenfrost temperature can be determined experimentally. Time and temperature curves can be generated as is shown in FIG. 3. The TL temperature is defined at the sharp break in the time-temperature curve. A plot of heat flux versus temperature as shown in
Also important is the Tcrit or the critical temperature. The impact of precipitation on strength can be expressed in equation form as
where a is the strength potential, σmin(T) is the minimum strength potential, t is time and K(T) is a temperature dependent kinetic rate constant.
To obtain the necessary data to determine both the TL and Tcrit, experiments were conducted by performing an elevated temperature quench on a thin sample fitted with a thermocouple using a uniformly distributed droplet type spray nozzle.
To cool continuous and/or semi-continuous strands, the present invention employs an array of zoned water spray orifices to controllably vary the time wherein the strand remains above the critical wetting temperature TL.
It is noted that with no water used and the metal alloy air quenched, the strength potential of the metal alloy drops off from 20,100 psi to 19,650 psi within about 16 feet from the furnace exit. With single spray orifice, the loss of strength potential is quicker but reaches approximately the same strength potential as with no liquid quench. Surprisingly, adding the second spray orifice drops the strength potential of the alloy a little quicker, but the strength potential drop off is about 19,900 psi. This is an improvement of about 56% less strength potential loss over the single spray orifice and the air quench. A third spray orifice improves the increase in strength potential by an additional 40% over the two spray orifice and 78% over a single spray orifice and air quench. This improvement is made without the physical distortion to the metal alloy strip that it is desired to avoid. The strip in this instance was a 6111 series aluminum alloy, as designated by the Aluminum Association registration system, it was 0.04 inches thick, with a horizontal translation of 100 fpm. The temperature of heat treatment was approximately 1060°C F.
In order to better understand the invention hereof, the experimental data was modeled to produce the curves of
It is noted, then, that quench rates can be affected by several different variables which can be used to design a different apparatus 1 and be applied to different worked and/or heated alloys. For example, residence time can be varied by changing the length of the run and/or by changing the time of the run. Instead of 100 fpm for 4 feet of quenching chamber, the length of the run could be, for example, varied to 8 feet of quenching chamber at a run speed of 50 fpm. It is entirely conceivable within the practice of the present invention that the liquid quenching is performed in a stationary mode to a forged or cast product. This dependence can also be varied by the number of orifices, although a fourth orifice in the above illustration in
Moulton, Daniel T., Bennon, William D., Jones, James P., Walker, Gene R.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10308993, | Jun 12 2015 | CONSOLIDATED ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC | System and method for improving quench air flow |
10385413, | Sep 18 2014 | Consolidated Engineering Company, Inc. | System and method for quenching castings |
11035016, | Jul 27 2015 | Consolidated Engineering Company, Inc. | System and method for improving quench air flow |
9951396, | Sep 18 2014 | CONSOLIDATED ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC | System and method for quenching castings |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3533261, | |||
4073332, | Sep 26 1974 | Centre de Recherches Metallurgiques Centrum Voor Research in de | Method of controlling continuous casting of a metal |
4610735, | Sep 29 1983 | Cegedur Societe de Transformation de l'Aluminium Pechiney | Method of modulated cooling to minimize deformation of flat metallurgical products |
5112412, | Nov 23 1989 | Alusuisse-Lonza Services Ltd. | Cooling of cast billets |
5382306, | Jun 19 1992 | Alusuisse-Lonza Services Ltd. | Spray unit for cooling extruded sections |
5447583, | Apr 29 1992 | Alcoa Inc | Extrusion quenching apparatus and related method |
5496423, | Jun 23 1992 | Alcoa Inc | Method of manufacturing aluminum sheet stock using two sequences of continuous, in-line operations |
5697169, | Nov 12 1996 | BUSCH CO | Apparatus for cooling strip and associated method |
5820705, | May 18 1993 | Alcoa Inc | Spray quenching of metal with liquid coolant containing dissolved gas |
DE1508432, | |||
EP334803, | |||
FR2571384, | |||
JP61189845, | |||
RE34442, | Jul 20 1987 | Norsk Hydro a.s | Method for producing an aluminum alloy |
WO9426939, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 19 1999 | JONES, JAMES P | Aluminum Company of America | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010432 | /0313 | |
Oct 19 1999 | MOULTON, DANIEL T | Aluminum Company of America | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010432 | /0313 | |
Oct 19 1999 | WALKER, GENE R | Aluminum Company of America | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010432 | /0313 | |
Nov 16 1999 | BENNON, WILLIAM D | Aluminum Company of America | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010432 | /0313 | |
Nov 18 1999 | Alcoa Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Oct 31 2016 | Alcoa Inc | ARCONIC INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 040599 | /0309 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 27 2005 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jan 15 2008 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Oct 22 2009 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 22 2009 | M1555: 7.5 yr surcharge - late pmt w/in 6 mo, Large Entity. |
Oct 07 2013 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 09 2005 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 09 2005 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 09 2006 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 09 2008 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 09 2009 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 09 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 09 2010 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 09 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 09 2013 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 09 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 09 2014 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 09 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |