A communications system including an over-voltage and over-current surge protection circuit is provided that passes high frequency signals between transmitting and receiving devices with low attenuation. The protection circuit includes a current limiter and over-voltage protection device. The over-voltage protection device includes a diode device comprising a set of anti-parallel diodes, which is connected in series with a shunt device. The over-voltage protection device is coupled between a signal transmission line and ground. The current limiter is coupled between the transmitting and receiving devices.
|
1. A high-frequency signal transmission system, comprising:
a remote unit configured to transmit and receive high-frequency signals over a first transmission medium; a network interface device (NID) coupled to the remote unit through the first transmission medium and configured to couple the first transmission medium to a second transmission medium; a customer premises equipment (CPE) coupled to the NID through the second transmission medium; and a surge protection circuit coupled to the first transmission medium, wherein the surge protection circuit comprises: a current limiting device coupled in series with the first transmission medium; an over-voltage protection shunt device coupled between the first transmission medium and ground; and a diode device coupled in series with the over-voltage protection shunt device in order to reduce signal attenuation in the high-frequency signals. 11. A high-frequency signal transmission system, comprising:
a remote digital terminal (RDT) configured to transmit and receive high-frequency signals over an optical fiber transmission medium; an optical network unit (ONU) coupled to the RDT through the optical fiber transmission medium and configured to coupled the optical fiber transmission medium to a first local transmission medium; a network interface device (NID) coupled to the ONU through the first local transmission medium and including an isolation transformer configured to couple the first local transmission medium to a second local transmission medium; a customer premises equipment (CPE) coupled to the NID through the second local transmission medium; a first surge protection circuit located in or in close proximity to the NID and coupled to the first local transmission medium; and a second surge protection circuit located in or in close proximity to the ONU and coupled to the first local transmission medium; wherein the first and second surge protection circuits each comprise: a current limiting device coupled in series with the first local transmission medium; an over-voltage protection shunt device coupled between the first local transmission medium and ground; and a diode device coupled in series with the over-voltage protection shunt device in order to reduce signal attenuation in the high-frequency signals.
2. The high-frequency signal transmission system of
3. The high-frequency signal transmission system of
4. The high-frequency signal transmission system of
5. The high-frequency signal transmission system of
6. The high-frequency signal transmission system of
7. The high-frequency signal transmission system of
8. The high-frequency signal transmission system of
9. The high-frequency signal transmission system of
10. The high-frequency signal transmission system of
|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the field of electronic surge protection circuits. More specifically, the invention relates to a surge protection circuit for communication networks that carry high-speed digital signals.
2. Description of the Related Art
In a typical communication network, telephone lines carry voice and data signals from a remote unit to a local unit. For example, in the context of a digital loop carrier ("DLC") system for extending fiber optic cable into the local-loop between a central office location and a plurality of subscribers, the remote unit could be a remote digital terminal ("RDT") or an optical network unit ("ONU"), and the local unit could be a network interface device ("NID"). The NID further couples the signals to the subscriber's telephony and data devices, which are referred to as customer premises equipment ("CPE").
The connections between the local units and the CPE usually include unshielded twisted pair ("UTP") wire. There is a first twisted pair used for incoming signals that travel from the network towards the CPE and a second twisted pair used for outgoing signals that travel away from the CPE towards the network. These UTP wires are susceptible to voltage and current surges often caused by lightning strikes or AC power (60 Hz) crosses. Therefore, surge protection devices or circuits are typically coupled to the UTP wires to protect the remote and local units, and the CPE, from being damaged by over-voltage and over-current conditions. For signal lines that carry high speed signals, such as 10Base-T Ethernet signals, such surge protection devices must have a low insertion-loss in order to avoid attenuation of the signals at high frequencies.
A communications system including an over-voltage and over-current surge protection circuit is provided that passes high frequency signals between transmitting and receiving devices with low attenuation. The protection circuit includes a current limiter and over-voltage protection device. The over-voltage protection device includes a diode device comprising a set of anti-parallel diodes, which is connected in series with a shunt device. The over-voltage protection device is coupled between a signal transmission line and ground. The current limiter is coupled between the transmitting and receiving devices.
As will be appreciated, the invention is capable of other and different embodiments, and its several details are capable of modifications in various respects, all without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and description of the preferred embodiments are to regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.
The present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following description in view of the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The NIDs 24 are preferably mounted on the exterior of a subscriber's house or building 26, although they could be mounted internally to this structure. From the NID 24, a second pair of wires 30, 32 couple the NID to the CPE 28. The protection circuit of the present invention 22 is preferably mounted within the ONU 20 and the NID 24, although it could be installed in just one of these two devices, or it could be installed external to these devices. Moreover, in the alternative embodiment in which the RDT 12 is connected directly to the NIDs 24, the protection circuit 22 would be mounted within or nearby the RDT 12.
In this system 10, a signal is transmitted from the remote unit 12 along the fiber optic connection 14 to the ONU 20. At the ONU 20, the signal is coupled through the protection device 22 onto one of the UTP wires 16, and is then coupled to the NID 24. At the NID 24, the signal is preferably coupled through a second protection device 22, onto the internal wiring 30 and then to the CPE 28. Similarly, signals from the CPE 28 are coupled to the RDT 12 through the NID 24, UTP wires 18, ONU 20, and the two protection devices 22. The protection circuit 22 provides over-voltage and over-current protection for the ONU 20 and the CPE 28, while also permitting high-frequency signals to pass through the circuit 22 with low signal attenuation.
A more detailed view of a protection circuit 22 according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 2. As seen here, the protection circuit 22 includes current limiters 22A and 22C, i.e., over-current protection devices, and over-voltage protection devices 22B and 22D. The current limiters 22A and 22C are connected in series with first and second lines 16A and 16B of the incoming twisted pair, and the over-voltage protection devices 22B and 22D are connected between the lines 16A and 16B and ground. Each of the current limiters 22A and 22C is preferably a bi-directional device that limits the amount of current that can pass through the device, e.g., resistance or inductance based devices. Various commercially available solid-state devices can be used for current limiters 22A and 22C.
Due to the long distance signals must travel along lines 16A, 16B, 18A, and 18B, a ground voltage potential can build up that may affect the function of the system 10. Also this ground potential can vary along a wire of this length. The transformers 34 and 36 isolate this ground potential and decouple the CPE from the loop.
As seen in
In contrast, in the second embodiment shown in
Each of the solid-state shunt devices 46 and 46' is a bi-directional device designed to limit the voltage across the device to a particular threshold voltage. Preferably, these devices utilize transient voltage supressor ("TVS") clamping or thyristor "crow bar" devices. Other devices could also be used in place of the TVS clamp or crow bar device. Various commercially available solid state devices can be used for the over-voltage shunting devices.
The sets of anti-parallel diodes 42 and 44, and 42' and 44' are connected in series with the shunt devices 46 and 46' between line 16A and ground to reduce the overall capacitance of the protection device. High capacitance in such a protection device causes attenuation of signals at high frequencies.
In operation, the protection circuits 22 and 38 shunt any voltage surge or over-voltage signal to ground. The diode devices 40 and 40' connected in series with the shunt device 46 and 46' between line 16A and ground reduce the overall capacitance Ceq of the over-voltage protection device 22B and 22B'. The capacitance value Ceq is reduced by placing the intrinsic capacitances of the solid-state devices in series, e.g., the shunt devices 46 and 46' and the diode devices 40 and 40'. When capacitors are connected in series the overall capacitance Ceq is reduced according to the formula [1]:
Thus, with a lower capacitance (Ceq,) high frequency signals pass through the protection devices 22 and 38 with low signal loss, i.e., low attenuation.
The invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments. Those skilled in the art will perceive improvements, changes, and modifications. Such improvements, changes and modifications are intended to be covered by the appended claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6982860, | Nov 13 2002 | Adtran, Inc. | Technique for fault isolation and transient load isolation for multiple electrical loads connected to a common electrical power source |
7136270, | Jan 28 2003 | Gateway Inc.; Gateway, Inc | Surge protector including data pass-through |
7230811, | Jul 11 2000 | MAGNOLIA LICENSING LLC | Modular power line network adapter |
8243412, | Apr 25 2008 | ADTRAN, INC | Surge protection systems and methods for outside plant ethernet |
8358492, | Apr 25 2008 | Adtran, Inc. | Surge protection systems and methods for ethernet communication equipment in outside plant environments |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4314304, | Mar 27 1980 | RELIANCE COMM TEC CORPORATION | Line protector for a communications circuit |
4325100, | Jun 12 1980 | RELIANCE COMM TEC CORPORATION | Line protector for a communications circuit |
4422121, | May 28 1982 | RELIANCE COMM TEC CORPORATION | Line protector for a communications circuit |
4876621, | Dec 08 1988 | BOURNS, INC | Line protector for a communications circuit |
4907120, | Dec 08 1988 | BOURNS, INC | Line protector for a communications circuit |
4958253, | Oct 25 1989 | BOURNS, INC | Line protector for a communications circuit |
4964140, | Jul 08 1987 | Fanuc Ltd. | Digital differential signal transmission apparatus |
5050210, | Mar 10 1989 | TELLABS BEDFORD, INC | Metallic current limiter |
5113186, | Dec 28 1990 | SIEMENS ENTERPRISE COMMUNICATIONS, INC | Apparatus for converting an alternate mark inversion signal to unipolar signals with frequency dependent amplification |
5195015, | Mar 07 1991 | BOURNS, INC | Line protector for a communications circuit |
5245412, | Feb 18 1992 | General Instrument Corporation; GENERAL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC | Low capacitance silicon transient suppressor with monolithic structure |
5311114, | Oct 27 1992 | LSI Corporation | Apparatus and method for full-duplex ethernet communications |
5570263, | Dec 27 1994 | CASCABEL RESEARCH, LLC | Communications bus surge protector |
5670799, | Jul 18 1991 | Intersil Corporation | High voltage protection using SCRs |
5706157, | Feb 26 1996 | EMERSON NETWORK POWER, ENERGY SYSTEMS, NORTH AMERICA, INC | Power distribution system with over-current protection |
5706303, | Apr 09 1996 | Laser diode coupling and bias circuit and method | |
5757599, | Jan 16 1996 | Converteam UK Ltd | Protection arrangement for a switching device |
5790363, | Dec 03 1997 | TII Industries, Inc. | Ethernet overvoltage/overcurrent protection system |
5815389, | Oct 03 1996 | EMERSON NETWORK POWER, ENERGY SYSTEMS, NORTH AMERICA, INC | System level current limiting |
5877534, | Oct 19 1994 | Siliconix Incorporated | Method of forming electrostatic discharge protection device for integrated circuit |
6005477, | Apr 17 1997 | ABB Research LTD | Method and apparatus for information transmission via power supply lines |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 07 1999 | YANCEY, GLENN | MARCONI COMMUNICATIONS, INC , A CORP OF DELAWARE | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010316 | /0917 | |
Oct 07 1999 | SZEWCZUL, MARK | MARCONI COMMUNICATIONS, INC , A CORP OF DELAWARE | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010316 | /0917 | |
Oct 08 1999 | Marconi Communications, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Oct 28 2003 | MARCONI COMMUNICATIONS, INC | MARCONI INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RINGFENCE INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 014646 | /0607 | |
Feb 20 2004 | MARCONI INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RINGFENCE , INC | Advanced Fibre Access Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 014532 | /0723 | |
Dec 08 2004 | Advanced Fibre Access Corporation | TELLABS BEDFORD, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016269 | /0577 | |
Dec 30 2016 | TELLABS ENTERPRISE, INC F K A TELLABS BEDFORD, INC | BANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 041233 | /0618 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Nov 28 2005 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 10 2008 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Feb 27 2009 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Feb 27 2009 | RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned. |
Aug 04 2009 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 24 2013 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
May 28 2005 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Nov 28 2005 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 28 2006 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
May 28 2008 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
May 28 2009 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Nov 28 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 28 2010 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
May 28 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
May 28 2013 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Nov 28 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 28 2014 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
May 28 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |