A method of color conversion includes preserving a 0% density for a particular color in the pre-conversion state to maintain a 0% density after conversion is provided via a translation table. density gradation methods include a gradient value structure such that the highlight and shadow regions of the density are more finely represented in comparison to non-highlight and non-shadow regions. A further density correction method includes supplying an amount of energy to a non-image area when printing using a first color, wherein the amount of energy will not produce a dot in the non-image area upon application of a second color. A printer may employ one or more of the above methods in the form of a translation table or a density correction patch.
|
11. A color printer comprising:
a density-calibration patch having a structure such that calibrations in a vicinity of a highlight portion and in a vicinity of a shadow portion are finely spaced in comparison with a non-highlight portion and a non-shadow portion.
17. A density gradient correction method comprising the step of:
supplying weak energy to a head corresponding to a non-image portion in a case of a primary color such that the intensity of a weak energy also does not cause a dot to be printed in the non-image portion in a case of a secondary or color.
20. A color printer comprising:
a density gradient translation table for supplying weak energy to a head corresponding to a non-image portion in a case of a primary color such an intensity of the weak energy also does not cause a dot to be printed in the non-image portion in a case of a secondary color.
10. A density gradient correction method comprising the step of:
performing density calibration by using a density calibration patch having a structure such that calibrations in a vicinity of a highlight portion and in a vicinity of a shadow portion are finely spaced in comparison with a non-highlight portion and a non-shadow portion.
24. A color printer comprising:
a translation table with which multidimensional color conversion is performed such that when at least one color of coloring materials has a halftone dot percentage of 0%, the energy for 0% gradient of the at least one color is fixed, wherein multidimensional coordinates correspond to X1, X2, . . ., and Xn axes of a Cartesian coordinate system, said n being an integer no less than three. 8. A printer comprising:
a halftone-dot area converting means for converting a first image information into a second image information having a set of halftone-dot areas which provide a gradation information of said first image information; a gradation correction table for correcting said gradation information in which a difference in energy corresponding to a solid gradient of a shadow portion is larger than that corresponding to other gradients.
23. A color converting method comprising:
performing three or more dimensional color conversion such that when at least one color of coloring materials has a halftone dot percentage of 0% in a state before the conversion, the at least one color keeps a halftone dot percentage of 0% after conversion, wherein a multidimensional coordinate correspond to X1, X2, . . ., and Xn axes of a Cartesian coordinate system, said n being an integer no less than three.
14. A density gradient correction method comprising the step of:
providing a margin width for a highlight portion and a margin width for a shadow portion, wherein the margin width for the highlight portion includes a first number of gradient values between a minimum gradient value and a gradient value corresponding to production of a 0% density, and wherein the margin width for the shadow portion includes a second number of gradient values between a maximum gradient value and a gradient value corresponding to production of a 100% density.
4. A color printer comprising:
a translation table with which color conversion is performed such that when at least one color of coloring materials has a halftone dot percentage of 0%, the energy for 0% gradient of the at least one color is fixed, wherein first X1, second X2 and third X3 coordinates correspond to axes of a Cartesian coordinate system, and wherein a fourth coordinate X4 corresponds to a K value and wherein fifth X5 and sixth X6 coordinates correspond to reference axes lying in a plane of the Cartesian coordinate system, said color conversion applied to at least three of said first through sixth coordinates.
1. A color converting method comprising the step of:
performing three or more dimensional color conversion such that when at least one color of coloring materials has a halftone dot percentage of 0% in a state before the conversion, the at least one color keeps a halftone dot percentage of 0% after conversion, wherein first X1, second X2 and third X3 coordinates correspond to axes of a Cartesian coordinate system, and wherein a fourth coordinate X4 corresponds to a K value and wherein fifth X5 and sixth X6 coordinates correspond to reference axes lying in a plane of the Cartesian coordinate system, said conversion applied to at least three of said first through sixth coordinates.
2. The method of
3. The method of
5. The color printer according to
6. The method of
7. The method of
9. The printer according to
12. A printer according to
a translation table with which color conversion is performed such that when at least one of color of coloring materials has a halftone dot percentage of 0%, the energy for a 0% gradient of the at least one color is fixed.
13. The color printer according to
15. The density gradient correction method according to
16. A method according to any of claims 10 and 14-15 further comprising:
performing three or more dimension color conversion such that when at least one color of coloring materials has a halftone dot percentage of 0% in a state before the conversion, the at least one color keeps 0% after conversion.
18. A method according to any of claims 1, 10, 14, 15, and 17, further comprising forming an image using a thin-film thermal transfer method.
19. A method according to
performing three or more dimensional color conversion such that when at least one color of coloring materials has a halftone dot percentage of 0% in a state before the conversion, the at least one color keeps a halftone dot percentage of 0% after conversion.
21. The printer according to any one of claims 4, 11 and 20 further including a thin-film thermal transfer imaging device.
22. A printer according to
|
The present invention relates to a color conversion method and a density gradient correction method for a printer for mainly producing a color proof for forming a color image and a printer capable of performing the methods
When a color proof is produced by using a color conversion (hereinafter called "color matching") technology for matching a color print to printed matter, a color matching method similar to a conventional method is employed. That is, yellow (Y), magenta (M), cyan (C) and black (K) data items are first converted into data of chromaticity, and then converted into C, M, Y and K data peculiar to the printing system by using a translation table. The above-mentioned method is a known and marketed color matching method as "Color Sync" (trade name).
A density calibration technology for correcting the sensitivity difference of a material and a machine is disclosed in Japanese Patent Application No. Hei. 9-126108 applied by the applicant of the present invention. The density calibration technology has the structure that the intervals of the instructed halftone % are made to be constant.
The two conventional methods have the following problems. When a color proof is produced by using the conventional color matching technology, color matching of pure colors, such as red (R), blue (B), green (G), Y, M and C, sometimes causes a highlight of another color to slightly be mixed with the pure color even if the hue of the coloring material is slightly shifted from a required hue. When a user performs an operation for confirming the produced color proof by using a magnifier in order to confirm the correctness of image data, halftone-dot gradient (the following fact cannot easily visually be confirmed in a case of density gradient) encounters the following problem: although, for example, red (R) is composed of only magenta (M) and yellow (Y), cyan (C) is sometimes mixed if the hue of the coloring material is slightly shifted from a required hue after the conventional color matching operation has been performed. In this case, there arises a problem in that a user incorrectly determines that original data has an error if mixture of cyan (C) is detected when the user confirms that data is composed of only magenta (M) and yellow (Y) by using a magnifier. Although original data is free from an error, color matching sometime causes another color to sometimes be mixed with the pure color.
The second conventional technology using the density calibration has the following problem.
(1) In a case of the halftone dot gradient, whether the gradient is solid (that is, a shadow having a gradient of 100%) or 99% can easily be determined by using a magnifier. That is, white missing in a solid image can easily be detected. When a user looks the image to confirm that the image is a solid image by using a magnifier, the user detects some white missing portions. In this case, there arises a problem in that the user misunderstands that original data has an error and thus checking cannot be performed.
(2) If original data is black data, solid characters are frequently used and thicknesses must strictly be correct. If an end of a character becomes faint, it appears that a thin character has been formed. To prevent this, a gradient of 99% is insufficient. In this case, the gradient must reliably be made to be 100%.
(3) The above-mentioned problems must always be solved even if the sensitivity of the material and the machine is changed. Therefore, density calibration for compensating the difference in the sensitivity of the material and the machine must be performed.
In a case of the halftone dot gradient, (1) whether or not a dot is included in the highlight and (2) whether or not the solid image is deformed are of extreme importance. Even if intermediate gradients are somewhat shifted, larger shift is permitted as compared with the highlight and shadow. Therefore, the accuracy for density-calibrating the highlight and the shadow must be improved.
(4) The sensitivity of a recording material for a second color is sometimes higher than that for a primary color. In this case, there arises a problem in that the margin for continuously reproducing the gradient in the secondary or higher color becomes insufficient for the highlight portions when the density calibration of the primary color is performed.
Since the sensitivity performance is different because of the difference in the material and the machine, shadow cannot sometimes be formed if the material and the machine have low sensitivity. When the material and machine have high sensitivity, highlight cannot sometimes be formed.
(5) Hitherto, weak energy has been supplied to a head to heat a non-image portion so as to prevent mixture of a dot with the highlight from taking place. In this case, a dot is undesirably added to even a non-image portion if the color is secondary or higher color and a highlight image is formed.
The present invention attempts to solve the above-mentioned problems and an object of the present invention is to provide a density gradient correction method with which a user does not misunderstand that original data has an error and which is capable of forming highlight to shadow regardless of the difference in the material and the machine and whether or not the color is a secondary or higher color.
To achieve objects, according to first aspect of the present invention, three or more dimensional color conversion is performed such that when at least one color of coloring materials, that is, a specific color such as C, M, Y, K, R, G, B or gold, is 0%, the at least one color is 0%.
According to a second aspect of the invention, the difference in energy is enlarged for only a solid gradient of a shadow portion as compared with that for a usual gradient.
According to a third aspect of the invention, the density gradient correction method of the second aspect is arranged in such a manner that the difference of only K is enlarged as compared with the differences of C, M and Y.
According to a fourth aspect of the invention, a method comprises the step of performing density calibration by using a density calibrating patch having a structure that calibrations in the vicinity of a highlight portion and a shadow portion are fine.
According to a fifth aspect of the invention, there is provided with a density-calibrating patch having a structure that calibrations in the vicinity of a highlight portion and a shadow portion are fine.
According to a sixth aspect of the invention, a method comprises the step of: providing a margin width for a highlight portion and a shadow portion. In this case, the margin width for the highlight portion is wider than that for the shadow portion.
According to a seventh aspect of the invention, a method comprises the step of also supplying weak energy to a head corresponding to a non-image portion in a case of a primary color such that the intensity of the weak energy does not cause a dot to be printed in the non-image portion in a case of-a secondary or higher color.
FIGS. 7(A) and 7(B) are graphs showing the relationship between an original image and reproduced dot percent, in which
FIGS. 8(A) and 8(B) are graphs showing the relationship between applied energy and reproduced dot percent;
A density gradient correction method for a printer incorporating a thermal head for forming a color image and a color printer adapted to the method according to the present invention will now be described with-reference to the drawings. Firstly, the structure according to a first embodiment in which color conversion is performed such that when at least one color of C, M, Y and K is 0%, the at least one color is 0% will now be described. In an example case where color is composed of Y, M and C, a three-dimensional lookup table as shown in
Therefore, when the three or higher dimensional lookup table obtained by actual measurement is used, mixture of a color except for a pure color sometimes causes the chromaticity near the pure color to be obtained in a case where a required pure color is printed by a color printer.
If a color includes C by 0% and a color including C by 1% is closer to a required color as compared with a color including C by 0% when the color including C by 0% is printed by a color printer, a color proof is undesirably produced in which C is included by 1%. In this case, a user having a magnifier easily detects mixture of C in a color proof in which C is not mixed (if C is included by 17% in a portion in which C must be included by 16%, the user does not hardly detect this). Thus, the user misunderstands that data is incorrect. Therefore, if a color proof in which at least one color of C, Y, M and K is 0% is printed (even in a case where more satisfactory matching of the hue can be realized when the color included by 0% is mixed), the at least one color is made to be 0% in the present invention. In the example of the cube, the fact that at least one color of C, M and Y is included by 0% is, for example, the three ridge lines of C, M and Y, the three diagonals B, R, G of the cube, a color (for example, orange) on the plane Y-M, a color (for example, blue purple) on the plane M-C and a color (for example, yellow green) on the plane C-Y. If at least one of C, M and Y is included by 0%, the above-mentioned arrangement is employed.
Specifically, the translation table for use to perform the density calibration is arranged in such a manner that when at least one of C, M and Y or C, M, Y and K obtained by adding K is 0%, energy for the 0% gradient of the color is fixed. When the above-mentioned translation table is used to produce a color proof, a user does not make a misunderstanding. If the hue of the pigment is made to be significantly close to the ink for printing, a problem that the hue is changed considerably can be prevented.
The density gradient correction according to a second embodiment will now be described.
A graph shown in FIG. 7(A) shows a curve indicating an object of reproduction of single-color gradient. The axis of abscissa stand for dot percents of an original image, while the axis of ordinate stands for dot percents obtained by performing measurement by using a reflection-type density measurement apparatus. The reflection density is reproduction of dot percent (dot %) by a Murray-Davis's equation. That is, since the reflection density is determined by using a densitometer in place of a special measurement, such as an image analysis, an assumption is made that the amount of an optical dot gain of the color proof is similar to that of color art CR-T manufactured by Fuji Film or the like. In accordance with the reflection density of the color art, the dot percent obtained in accordance with the Murray-Davis's equation is employed as an object of the reproduction. It is ideal (an object) that reproduced area of halftone dot area of the color proof after transference of an output image from a color printer to paper coincides with original image (supplied digital data).
To achieve the above-mentioned object of reproduction in any case, the present invention has a structure that installation to a color printer for making a color proof is performed in such a manner that compression and movement of ends of the gradient shown in a graph shown in FIG. 7(B);and according to the present invention are performed. The obtained results are formed into a reproduction curve of a single-color. That is, the graph shown in FIG. 7(B) has a structure in such a manner that the axis of abscissa stands for the designed gradient which is equally divided into 256 sections from 0 in a direction from right to left. The right-hand end indicates the largest gradient value (recording energy) for a color printer engine, while the left-hand end indicates a gradient value of zero for the color printer engine. The above-mentioned graph is characterized in that the figure 244 of the axis of abscissa stands for solid black having a dot reproduction value of 100. Moreover, the figure 39 of the axis of abscissa stands for highlight having a dot reproduction value of 0. That is, the highlight having the dot percent reproduction value of 0 starts at about 39 in place of starting at 0. Moreover, the solid black having the dot percent reproduction value of 100 is realized when the figure is about 244 on the axis of abscissa. The regions on the axis of abscissa from 0 to 39 and from 244 to 255 are called margins in this embodiment.
The necessity of the margin will now be described with reference to a graph shown in FIG. 8(A) with which a conventional density calibration method is shown and a graph shown in FIG. 8(B) showing the present invention.
FIG. 8(A) shows an ideal (object) curve shown in FIG. 7(A) with a solid line. FIG. 8(B) shows an ideal (object) dot percent curve shown in FIG. 7(B) with a solid line. A high-sensitivity graph (alternate long and short dash line) obtained when sensitive material and machine are used is drawn on the left of each of the above-mentioned two graphs. Moreover, a low-sensitivity graph (alternate long and two short dashes line) obtained when low-sensitive material and machine are used is drawn on the right of each of the above-mentioned two graphs. The dot percent is also called a halftone dot % which is an area ratio of printed ink.
As shown in FIG. 8(A), the ideal solid-line curve has a form that the dot reproduction % is zero when the applied energy is 0%. When applied energy is 100%, also the dot reproduction % is 100. However, the graph shown in FIG. 8(A) sometimes encounters undesirable change in the dot percent even if the same energy is supplied in a case where the materials and machine have differences. If the right- and left-hand margins are too small when shadow or highlight is formed, there arises the following problem: if the sensitivity of the material and the machine are too low, the alternate long and two short dashes line on the right of the ideal solid-line curve is employed. In this case, the dot reproduction % is not 100 when the applied energy is 100%. The dot reproduction % is terminated at about 97%. That is, there sometimes occurs a case in which the dot percent of 100% which is the full gradient in the shadow portion cannot be realized. If a sensitive material or a sensitive machine is employed, the alternate long and dash line on the left of the ideal solid-line curve is employed. Thus, the dot percent cannot be made to be 0 when the applied energy is 0%. The dot percent is terminated at about 3%. That is, there sometimes occurs a case in which highlight of 0% cannot be realized.
Moreover, there is a tendency that a high sensitivity of the material is realized in the secondary or higher color as compared with a single color (a primary color) (that is, higher dot percent is realized in the secondary color as compared with the primary color even if the same energy is applied). A graph indicating the above-mentioned tendency is shown in FIG. 8(A) with a dashed line. Also in this case, there is the same tendency as that realized when the sensitive material and the machine. Thus, the conventional method cannot express highlight.
The correction method according to the present invention having the margins as shown in FIG. 8(B) is able to reproduce dot percent of 0% to 100% even in the case where (1) the low sensitive material and machine are used, (2) the sensitive material and machine are used and (3) a secondary color is printed.
Density calibration tables according to the correction method according to the present invention are shown in
When density calibration which is a first step for adjusting the color density is performed, the color printer corrects machine difference in the color printer or dispersion of the color density occurring as time elapses or confirms the correction by producing an output of a density calibration chart.
Referring to
On the other hand, the density calibration is performed as follows: the density of a density calibration chart (see FIG. 6 and to be described later) output from the color printer 30 is measured by a densitometer 90. A result of the measurement of the color density is supplied to the editing unit 10 comprising a personal computer. Image data supplied to the editing unit 10 is converted in accordance with the result of the measurement. If image data required to be printed is supplied from, for example, a color scanner 99 to the editing unit 10, the editing unit 10 converts image data in accordance with the result of the measurement, and then corrected data is supplied to the color printer 30.
The color printer 30 shown in
Referring to
Referring to
A density calibration chart for performing the density calibration is shown in FIG. 6. As shown in
Referring to tables shown in
The density calibration according to the present invention are summarized as follows:
(1) Provision of Margin for Highlight Portion for Correcting Characteristic of Higher-Order Colors (Sensitization of Secondary, Tertiary and Quaternary Colors)
In a heat sensitive recording system, an insensitive region in which a satisfactory density (dots cannot be formed) cannot be obtained even if energy is supplied exists.
In a color printer adapted to a thin-film transfer method, the foregoing region is large (energy with which dots are formed is high) in a case of a single color (which is recorded on a receiver sheet). In a case of a secondary or higher color (which is recorded on the previously recorded dot or recorded adjacent to the previously recorded dot), the foregoing is small as compared with the single color (energy with which dots are formed is low) (see FIG. 8(B)).
Therefore, if reproduction of applied energy-dot percent of a color printer is designed by using the characteristic of a single color, dots are rapidly formed in the highlight portion in a case of the secondary or higher color. Thus, color jump takes place and thus disorder takes place (see FIG. 8(A)).
When the margin in the vicinity of the highlight is previously enlarged as shown in FIG. 7(B) when the gradient is designed, the disorder of the secondary or higher colors can be prevented, as shown in FIG. 8(B).
Separation between the primary color and the secondary or higher colors is compensated by performing conversion by using a color table.
(2) Provision of Density Calibration Margin:
In a color printer, the sensitivity of a single color is sometimes undesirably changed because of the difference in the machine, the sensitive material and the lot difference.
If the reproduction of the applied energy-dot % of the printer is designed by using a mean combination, 100% (solid) is deformed and eliminated if the low sensitivity factors are combined with each other (see FIG. 8(A)).
When the margin in the vicinity of the shadow is, in the gradient design, provided as shown in FIG. 7(B), reproduction of a solid can be realized even if the sensitivity is low as shown in FIG. 8(B) (since the margin in the vicinity of the highlight is enlarged in (1) in the case of the high sensitivity, the reproduction can be realized).
The foregoing problem is corrected by printing a wedge in single color, by measuring the density and by calculating a correction curve (density calibration).
(1) 1-Heat
To prevent addition of a dot to highlight (in an initial stage) and deformation of a solid portion having a small area, the output-side gradient point is assigned to original data of 0%. In this case, the phenomena 1-(1) and 1-(2) are considered, dot addition is prevented even if sensitive factors are combined and even if a higher-order color is printed.
Design is performed in such a manner that energy is applied, the magnitude of which does not cause a tail (addition of a small dot) even after the solid image has been printed.
If small energy is supplied to the head to previously heat the head in a case where a non-image portion is printed, the addition of a dot to the highlight (in the initial stage) and deformation of a solid portion having a small area can be prevented.
(2) Movement of Solid Point (Improvement in Deformation of Solid and Generation of White Missing Portion):
In the central portion of the patch for measuring the density (about 1 cm x 1 cm), the solid portion of a solid point (having a gradient value of 244 in the print engine shown in
Therefore, only the point of input 100% for C, M, Y and K is shifted toward the large energy portion by six gradients (/255) from the solid point (having a gradient value of 244 in the print engine shown in
Moreover, the point of input 100% is moved to the point of the maximum energy (having a gradient value of 255 in the print engine shown in
The reason why the maximum energy point is not employed and the variable method is employed for C, M, Y and K will now be described. If excessively large energy is supplied, the color printer sometimes encounters overheat which is a phenomenon in which a white missing portion is formed in the central portion of the dot. Therefore, both of the overheat and the deformation of the solid portion must be prevented.
Since excessive missing does not take place in K, reproduction (prevention of deformation) of hair lines and characters is given priority. Thus, the shift to the maximum energy is employed.
The foregoing method was adapted to a color printer according to the following embodiment so as to confirm the effect of the present invention.
Condition
Printer: Digital Color Proof FIRST PROOF Printer manufactured by Fuji Film
Laminator: Digital Color Proof FIRST PROOF Laminator manufactured by Fuji Film
Receiving Sheet: Receiver Sheet A3W for Digital Color Proof FIRST PROOF manufactured by Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.
Thermal Transfer Ribbon: Proof Ribbon Adjacent for Digital Color Proof FIRST PROOF manufactured by Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.
Main Paper: Tokubishi Art Paper
The receiving sheet and the thermal transfer ribbon were those for the thin-layer thermal transfer process. The material adapted to the foregoing method incorporates a coloring material layer having a thickness of 1 μm or smaller, preferably about 0.3 μm or smaller. Since the thickness is very small, a higher resolution can be obtained as compared with the other thermal transfer method. Therefore, fine dots can stably be formed.
Other purposes, as well as the thermal transfer method, the method according to the present invention is effective for electronic photographic, ink jet, color heat sensitive, Toner Jet and ion flow printers.
As described above, according to the present invention, mixture of another color with the primary color can be prevented. Therefore, an unsatisfactory portion cannot be detected even if the dot is observed with a magnifier. The solid image can be formed without any gap. Characters in K can be clearly formed. The accuracy of the density calibration can be improved. Even if the sensitivity of the secondary color is raised as compared with the primary color, any problem that an undesirable dot is printed additionally can be prevented.
If the above-mentioned methods are employed simultaneously, all of the following checking items for color proof can be performed:
(1) checking whether or not data of another color is mixed with data to be printed;
(2) checking whether or not a complete solid portion in the data to be printed has been formed;
(3) checking of the thickness of characters; and
(4) checking of continuity of gradient of highlight and shadow, in particular, gradation.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6606167, | Jun 01 1999 | Adobe Inc | Calibrating a printer using a self-printed chart |
6891649, | Jul 28 1999 | FUJIFILM Corporation | Method of and apparatus for generating color conversion table and apparatus for generating proof using color conversion table |
6912370, | Nov 30 2000 | Ricoh Company, LTD | Dual sided image printing device and method |
7139010, | Mar 12 2003 | AGFA NV | Thermal head printer and process for printing substantially light-insensitive recording materials |
7239745, | Sep 30 2002 | Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Color-converting apparatus |
7256912, | Jun 25 2003 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Adaptive generation of perceptually uniform samples for printer characterization |
7595906, | Jan 17 2001 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Calibration method for density in image forming apparatus |
7633646, | Oct 30 2003 | Konica Minolta Business Technologies, Inc. | Image forming method and apparatus |
8009324, | Sep 30 2003 | DIGIMARC CORPORATION AN OREGON CORPORATION | Methods and apparatuses for printer calibration |
8149458, | Sep 30 2003 | DIGIMARC CORPORATION AN OREGON CORPORATION | Methods and apparatuses for printer calibration |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4926251, | Apr 07 1987 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Color image processing apparatus with image corrector |
5255085, | Oct 25 1991 | Eastman Kodak Company | Adaptive technique for providing accurate tone reproduction control in an imaging system |
5410335, | Jul 02 1991 | FUJIFILM Corporation | Method and apparatus for recording an image on a multicolor thermal recording material |
5528339, | Aug 26 1994 | Intellectual Ventures Fund 83 LLC | Color image reproduction of scenes with color enhancement and preferential tone mapping |
5574544, | Aug 29 1994 | Konica Corporation | Image forming apparatus having image density gradation correction means |
5680230, | Sep 09 1993 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image processing method and apparatus thereof |
5689590, | Apr 30 1992 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Background noise removing apparatus and method applicable to color image processing apparatus |
5740502, | Jan 19 1995 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image forming apparatus and image forming method for forming adjacent images |
5856876, | Apr 06 1995 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image processing apparatus and method with gradation characteristic adjustment |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jul 29 1998 | Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Aug 14 1998 | SAWANO, MITSURU | FUJI PHOTO FILM CO , LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 009521 | /0287 | |
Aug 14 1998 | SHIRAI, SHU | FUJI PHOTO FILM CO , LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 009521 | /0287 | |
Jan 30 2007 | FUJIFILM HOLDINGS CORPORATION FORMERLY FUJI PHOTO FILM CO , LTD | FUJIFILM Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 018904 | /0001 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Dec 13 2002 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Dec 02 2005 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Nov 25 2009 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Nov 27 2013 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jun 25 2005 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Dec 25 2005 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 25 2006 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jun 25 2008 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jun 25 2009 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Dec 25 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 25 2010 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jun 25 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jun 25 2013 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Dec 25 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 25 2014 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jun 25 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |