An EMI shield that utilzes perforated dimples or other features configured to reflect electromagnetic radiation while simultaneously permitting air flow through the shielding material.
|
2. An electromagnetic interference shield, comprising a conductive sheet and a plurality of perforated dimples in the sheet, each dimple comprising a segmented inner dimple and a banded outer dimple, the bands of the outer dimple at least partially covering gaps between segments of the inner dimple.
1. An electromagnetic interference shield, comprising conductive material having a plurality of perforated parabolic dimples formed therein, each perforated dimple comprising an inner dimple characterized by parabolic segments separated by gaps and an outer dimple characterized by parabolic bands covering the gaps between the segments of the inner dimple.
5. An electromagnetic interference shielded electronic module, comprising:
an electronic device capable of generating electromagnetic radiation; and a housing at least partially enclosing the electronic device, the housing having a plurality of walls at least one of which comprises a conductive material having a plurality of perforated dimples formed therein, each dimple comprising a segmented inner dimple and a banded outer dimple, the bands of the outer dimple at least partially covering gaps between segments of the inner dimple.
4. An electromagnetic interference shielded electronic module, comprising:
an electronic device capable of generating electromagnetic radiation; and a housing at least partially enclosing the electronic device, the housing having a plurality of walls at least one of which comprises a conductive material having a plurality of perforated dimples formed therein, each perforated dimple comprising an inner dimple characterized by parabolic segments separated by gaps and an outer dimple characterized by parabolic bands covering the gaps between the segments of the inner dimple.
3. The shield of
|
The invention relates generally to electromagnetic interference (FMI) shielding in electronic systems.
The operation of electronic circuitry used in many electronic devices is often accompanied by unwanted stray electromagnetic radiation. Stray electromagnetic radiation or "noise" can interfere with the performance of surrounding devices. Consequently, it is important to shield electronic devices to reduce electronic noise emanating from those devices.
Redundant arrays of inexpensive or independent storage devices (RAID) are being employed by the mass storage industry to provide variable capacity storage. RAID systems use interconnected disk drives to achieve the desired capacity of mass storage. With this approach, a disk drive of one capacity may be manufactured and packaged with the same or different capacity drives to provide the required storage capacity. RAID systems eliminate the need to manufacture disk drives individually designed to meet specific storage requirements. Each disk drive in a RAID system is usually housed in an individual module for handling and installation. The modules slide into and out of a larger enclosure that houses the array of disk drives and provides the sockets, plug-ins and other connections for the electrical interconnection of the drives. Controllers orchestrate the interconnection and control access to selected disk drives for data reading and writing operations.
Each module includes a plastic housing and, in most cases, some type of metal EMI shielding. Metal shielding is often constructed as metal plates, panels, partial enclosures and the like positioned within or about the housing. The metal attenuates stray electronic signals emanating from the module as well as stray signals coming from surrounding modules. The degree of attenuation increases with the amount, placement and composition of metal shielding. A closed metal box, for example, would provide excellent shielding. The housing, however, must also permit sufficient air flow to cool the device during operation. Hence, there must be adequate openings in the housing and the shielding to provide the necessary degree of cooling air flow.
The present invention is directed to an EMI shield that utilizes perforated dimples or other features configured to reflect electromagnetic radiation while simultaneously permitting air flow through the shielding material.
The details of one embodiment of dimples 14 will now be described with reference to
Referring to
"Dimple" characterizes the reflective feature as viewed from inside enclosure 10. These same features might also be characterized as "bumps" when viewed from the outside of enclosure 10. Hence, "dimple" is a relative term that refers generally to the desired reflective feature on enclosure 10 or, more generally, on any shielding material of interest.
Conventional EMI shielding relies on holes and/or waveguides in metal sheeting to permit air flow. The extent to which conventional EMI shielding attenuates stray electromagnetic radiation (i.e., "noise") depends on the cut-off frequency of the holes or waveguides and the number of holes or waveguides. The degree of electromagnetic attenuation of the dimpled structure of the present invention, by contrast, depends on the reflective properties of the electromagnetic radiation. If the electromagnetic radiation is below the cut-off frequency of a conventional waveguide, then the waveguide rapidly attenuates the signals. If, however, the electromagnetic radiation is above the cut-off frequency, then the signals pass readily through the waveguide. The dimpled structure of the present invention can be made to reflect part or all frequencies of electromagnetic radiation back into the enclosure, with the greatest reflective effect when the dimples are in the far-field for the frequency of interest. A dimple is in the far-field if the source of the electromagnetic radiation is at least λ/2 from the dimple where λ is the wavelength. The wavelength of the radiation decreases as the frequency increases according to the relationship λ=c/f, where λ is the wavelength, c is the speed of light and f is the frequency. For example, the far-field for electromagnetic radiation at a frequency of 5 GHz is about 9.5 mm and the far-field is closer than 9.5 mm for frequencies higher than 5 GHz. Hence, the dimpled construction of the present invention offers an effective alternative to conventional waveguides particularly for higher frequency radiation.
While it is expected that the parabolic dimples illustrated in
The present invention has been shown and described with reference to the foregoing exemplary embodiment in which parabolic inner and outer dimples are used. Other embodiments are possible. For example, the EMI shielding may use only an outer dimple or only an inner dimple in cases where more air flow is necessary or desired and less noise attenuation may be tolerated. Although parabolic dimples are preferred for the reasons noted above, other shapes may be adequate in some applications. It should be understood, therefore, that the invention is to be construed broadly within the scope of the following claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3898421, | |||
4127758, | Oct 13 1977 | Sheldahl, Inc. | Tactile layer having hinged dome |
4749298, | Apr 30 1987 | United Technologies Corporation | Temperature resistant fastener arrangement |
5928076, | Sep 25 1997 | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | EMI-attenuating air ventilation panel |
6252161, | Nov 22 1999 | Dell USA, L.P. | EMI shielding ventilation structure |
6297446, | Feb 26 1999 | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | High performance EMC vent panel |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Apr 20 2001 | Hewlett-Packard Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Nov 26 2005 | 4 years fee payment window open |
May 26 2006 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 26 2006 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Nov 26 2008 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Nov 26 2009 | 8 years fee payment window open |
May 26 2010 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 26 2010 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Nov 26 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Nov 26 2013 | 12 years fee payment window open |
May 26 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 26 2014 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Nov 26 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |