There is provided a cathode-ray tube including an envelope having a neck, a funnel and a panel fused to the funnel by using frit glass, the outside of the panel being near flat, the inside of the panel having a predetermined curvature, in which 1.7≦T2/T1≦2.3 when T1 is the thickness of the center of the panel and T2 is the thickness of the diagonal corner of the panel, and a panel inside tensile stress at the fused portion of the panel and funnel is less than -1.3876x+128.24 (Kgf/cm2) when the size of the effective picture area of the cathode-ray tube is x(unit: cm). The panel inside tensile stress at the fused portion of the panel and funnel is maintained below a predetermined value to mitigate breakage inside the furnaces that occurs when the cathode-ray tube having the panel whose outside is near flat and whose inside has a predetermined curvature is reproduced, thereby improving the salvage rate.
|
4. A cathode-ray tube including an envelope having a neck, a funnel and a panel fused to the funnel by using frit glass, the outside of the panel being near flat, the inside of the panel having a predetermined curvature,
wherein 1.7≦T2/T1≦2.3 when T1 is the thickness of the center of the panel and T2 is the thickness of the diagonal corner of the panel, and a panel inside tensile stress p_in at the fused portion of the panel and funnel satisfies 13.9±1 (Kgf/cm2)≦P_n≦72.0 (Kgf/cm2).
1. A cathode-ray tube including an envelope having a neck, a funnel and a panel fused to the funnel by using frit glass, the outside of the panel being near flat, the inside of the panel having a predetermined curvature,
wherein 1.7≦T2/T1≦2.3 when T1 is the thickness of the center of the panel and T2 is the thickness of the diagonal corner of the panel, and a panel inside tensile stress at the fused portion of the panel and funnel is less than -1.3876x+128.24 (Kgf/cm2) when the size of the effective picture area of the cathode-ray tube is x (unit: cm).
2. The cathode-ray tube as claimed in
3. The cathode-ray tube as claimed in
5. The cathode-ray tube as claimed in
6. The cathode-ray tube as claimed in
7. The cathode-ray tube as claimed in
8. The cathode-ray tube as claimed in
9. The cathode-ray tube as claimed in
10. The cathode-ray tube as claimed in
11. The cathode-ray tube as claimed in
12. The cathode-ray tube as claimed in
13. The cathode-ray tube as claimed in
14. The cathode-ray tube as claimed in
|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a cathode-ray tube having a panel whose outside is flat and, more particularly, to a flat cathode-ray tube in which stress distribution at a fused portion of the panel and funnel is artificially changed to improve salvage rate of glass in a salvage process.
2. Description of the Related Art
As shown in
As shown in
The cathode-ray tube is fabricated by passing through multiple processes including a process of forming a screen on the inside of the panel, a sealing process of fusing the panel 1 and the funnel 2 to each other using frit glass to seal them, and an exhaust process for making the inside of the cathode-ray tube with high vacuum. In addition, constituent elements such as the electron gun 8, shadow mask 3, frame 4 and inner shield 7 are set inside the cathode-ray tube. There may be generated a fail in a specific element during the fabrication process or after completion of the process or generated a fail in a specific process. In this case, it is required that a poor cathode-ray tube is salvaged.
The conventional cathode-ray tube panel has the inner and outer surfaces having specific curvatures, as shown in
In case that the wedge rate of the panel is above 170%, tensile stress of the fused portion due to thermal shock in the furnaces becomes very large, to bring about "corner pull" phenomenon that means breakage at the diagonal corners of the panel when the panel and funnel are detached from each other, as shown in FIG. 4. This decreases the salvage rate of the panel and funnel that conventionally accounts for 35-45% of the cost of the FCD-type tube. To minimize this breakage rate requires improvement in complicated furnace processes such as Stabi process, frit sealing process, exhaust process, etc. and, especially, management of the stress in the frit sealing process for fusing the panel and funnel to each other in fabrication of the cathode-ray tube. However, this needs exorbitant investment for improvement of temperature of the furnace and deteriorates productivity to increase the cost of products.
It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to provide a cathode-ray tube capable of being manufactured with high productivity without requiring an additional investment.
To accomplish the object of the present invention, there is provided a cathode-ray tube including an envelope having a neck, a funnel and a panel fused to the funnel by using frit glass, the outside of the panel being near flat, the inside of the panel having a predetermined curvature, in which 1.7≦T2/T1≦2.3 when T1 is the thickness of the center of the panel and T2 is the thickness of the diagonal corner of the panel, and a panel inside tensile stress at the fused portion of the panel and funnel is less than -1.3876x+128.24 (Kgf/cm2) when the size of the effective picture area of the cathode-ray tube is x(unit: cm).
When the size of the effective picture area of the cathode-ray tube is x (unit: cm), the panel inside tensile stress at the fused portion of the panel and funnel is preferably less than -1.4625x+119.88 and more preferably less than -1.487x+117.1.
Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
The inventor carried out a test for finding out key factors affecting salvage of cathode-ray tubes according to a variation in the temperature inside the frit sealing furnace on the basis of the fact that considerable irregular temperature distribution generates at the fused portion of the diagonal corner of the panel due to a thickness difference caused by wedge rate thereat.
TABLE 1 | ||||
Sealing temperature profile analysis | ||||
Test#1 | Test#2 | Test#3 | Test#4 | |
Heating rate(°C C./min) | 14.1 | 10.9 | 11.1 | 10.8 |
Keeping time(min) | 27.7 | 35.0 | 32.9 | 29.6 |
Cooling rate(°C C./min) | 6.1 | 6.0 | 5.7 | 5.8 |
Peak temperature(°C C.) | 454.8 | 451.0 | 445.3 | 443.0 |
Salvage rate(%) | 5 | 100 | 75 | 90 |
Referring to Table 1, it can be known that the salvage rate is previously determined by the heating rate, keeping time, cooling rate and peak temperature in the sealing furnace.
TABLE 2 | |||||||
Analysis of correlation by stresses | |||||||
Variable | P_out | P_cent | P_in | F_out | F_cent | F_in | Salvage rate |
P_out | 1.000 | 0.5989 | 0.4194 | 0.0331 | -0.6696 | 0.1796 | 0.3779 |
P_cent | 0.5989 | 1.0000 | 0.8917 | -0.7277 | 0.1486 | -0.1279 | 0.9304 |
P_in | 0.4194 | 0.8917 | 1.0000 | -0.8861 | 0.3900 | -0.5630 | 0.9863 |
F_out | 0.0331 | -0.7277 | -0.8861 | 1.0000 | -0.7642 | 0.6157 | -0.9119 |
F_cent | -0.6696 | 0.1486 | 0.3900 | -0.7642 | 1.0000 | -0.5885 | 0.4328 |
F_in | 0.1796 | -0.1279 | -0.5630 | 0.6157 | -0.5885 | 1.0000 | -0.4631 |
Salvage rate | 0.3779 | 0.9304 | 0.9863 | -0.9119 | 0.4328 | -0.4631 | 1.0000 |
As shown in the Table 2, the correlation of the salvage rate and the stresses by positions of the fused portion of the panel and funnel has the highest value of 0.9863 of the panel inside tensile stress (P_in). Consequently, the panel inside tensile stress (P_in) has the greatest influence on the salvage rate.
Next, relationships between the panel inside tensile stress (P_in) at the fused portion of the panel and funnel and the heating rate, keeping time, cooling rate and peak temperature in the sealing furnace was analyzed by a statistical analysis method.
The result is shown in the following table 3.
TABLE 3 | ||||
Analysis of key factors by stresses | ||||
Equation | R-square | F-ratio | Correlation | |
Heating rate | P_in = | 0.9 | 0.04 | O |
(°C C./min) | 155.1 - 16.2*heat | |||
Keeping time | P_in = | 0.4 | 0.3 | x |
(min) | 204.1 - 9.6*keep | |||
Cooling rate | P_in = | 0.3 | 0.5 | x |
(°C C./min) | 401.1 - 74*cool | |||
Peak temperature | P_in = | 0.4 | 0.4 | x |
((°C C.) | 1237.5 - 4*peak | |||
Referring to Table 3, the heating rate having R-square of 0.9 and F-ratio of 0.04 has discriminative correlation from the other factors. In general, a factor having R-square of above 0.5 and F_ratio of below 0.05 is considered to have correlation according to the statistical analysis method. Consequently, since the heating rate among the factors in the sealing furnace has the highest correlation with the panel inside tensile stress (P_in) at the fused portion of the panel and funnel, the panel inside tensile stress (P_in) can be managed by managing the index time including the heating rate in the sealing furnace. For instance, the sealing furnace index time of 29" FCD cathode-ray tube is 18-19 seconds, approximately. It was confirmed that the panel inside tensile stress (P_in) at the fused portion of the panel and funnel becomes smaller as the index time becomes longer but becomes larger as it becomes shorter.
The inventor tested salvage rates by inside tensile stresses with respect to 17" (406 mm), 19" (457 mm), 21" (508 mm), 25" (590 mm) and 29" (676 mm) FCD cathode-ray tubes in order to confirm the relation between the panel inside tensile stress (P_in) and the salvage rate. The tested results are shown in Table 4 and
TABLE 4 | |||||
Relationship between the panel inside tensile stress and salvage | |||||
rate with respect to 17" FCD | |||||
Panel inside tensile stress (Kgf/cm2) | 56.9 | 60.4 | 72.0 | 92.9 | 95.0 |
Salvage rate (%) | 90 | 85 | 70 | 30 | 10 |
TABLE 5 | |||||
Relationship between the panel inside tensile stress and salvage | |||||
rate with respect to 19" FCD | |||||
Panel inside tensile stress (Kgf/cm2) | 49.3 | 53.1 | 63.7 | 90.5 | 93.4 |
Salvage rate (%) | 90 | 85 | 70 | 30 | 10 |
TABLE 6 | |||||
Relationship between the panel inside tensile stress and salvage | |||||
rate with respect to 21" FCD | |||||
Panel inside tensile stress (Kgf/cm2) | 36.7 | 45.9 | 57.1 | 88.4 | 91.6 |
Salvage rate (%) | 90 | 85 | 70 | 30 | 10 |
TABLE 7 | |||||
Relationship between the panel inside tensile stress and salvage | |||||
rate with respect to 25" FCD | |||||
Panel inside tensile stress (Kgf/cm2) | 29.5 | 33.8 | 46.6 | 76.7 | 88.2 |
Salvage rate (%) | 90 | 85 | 70 | 30 | 10 |
TABLE 8 | |||||
Relationship between the panel inside tensile stress and salvage | |||||
rate with respect to 29" FCD | |||||
Panel inside tensile stress (Kgf/cm2) | 13.9 | 27.1 | 32.5 | 68.3 | 82.6 |
Salvage rate (%) | 90 | 85 | 70 | 30 | 10 |
The salvage rate is 70% approximately when the panel inside tensile stress (P_in) of the fused portion of the panel and funnel is 72.0 (Kgf/cm2) and it abruptly decreases when the tensile stress is above 72.0 (Kgf/cm2) in case of 17" FCD (406 mm) as shown in Table 4 and FIG. 7. The salvage rate is 70% approximately when the panel inside tensile stress (P_in) is 63.7 (Kgf/cm2) and it abruptly decreases when the tensile stress is larger than 63.7 (Kgf/cm2) in case of 19" FCD (457 mm) as shown in Table 5 and FIG. 8. The salvage rate is 70% approximately when the panel inside tensile stress (P_in) 57.1 (Kgf/cm2) and it abruptly decreases when the tensile stress is above 57.1 (Kgf/cm2) in case of 21" FCD (508 mm) as shown in Table 6 and FIG. 9.
In case of 25" FCD (590 mm), the salvage rate is 70% approximately when the panel inside tensile stress (P_in) of the fused portion of the panel and funnel is 46.6 (Kgf/cm2) and it abruptly decreases when the tensile stress exceeds 46.6 (Kgf/cm2) as shown in Table 7 and FIG. 10. In case of 29" FCD (676 mm), the salvage rate is 70% approximately when the panel inside tensile stress (P_in) is 32.5 (Kgf/cm2) and it abruptly decreases when the tensile stress is larger than 32.5 (Kgf/cm2) as shown in Table 8 and FIG. 11.
To manage the panel inside tensile stress (P_in) at the fused portion of the panel and funnel according to the present invention, the index time in the sealing furnace should be managed substantially as described above. In this case, the panel inside tensile stress (P_in) becomes smaller as the index time becomes longer and the critical tensile stress of the material of the fused portion is also decreased. However, it is not preferable to lengthen the index time in order to lower the tensile stress in case of the salvage rate of 90-100% in terms of yield. Accordingly, it is preferable that the minimum tensile stress of the fused portion of the panel and funnel is 56.9±5 (Kgf/cm2) in case of 17" FCD cathode-ray tube, 49.3±3 (Kgf/cm2) in case of 19" FCD, 36.7±2 (Kgf/cm2) in case of 21" FCD, 29.5±3 (Kgf/cm2) in case of 25" FCD, and 13.9±1 (Kgf/cm2) in case of 29" FCD. Here, the error range of 5-10% approximately was given because the optimal panel inside tensile stress (P_in) at the fused portion of the panel and funnel was obtained when the salvage rate is 90-95%.
According to the present invention, as described above, the panel inside tensile stress at the fused portion of the panel and funnel is maintained below a predetermined value to mitigate breakage inside the furnaces that occurs when the cathode-ray tube having the panel whose outside is near flat and whose inside has a predetermined curvature is reproduced, thereby improving the salvage rate.
Although specific embodiments including the preferred embodiment have been illustrated and described, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, which is intended to be limited solely by the appended claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5925977, | Oct 30 1996 | Asahi Glass Company Ltd | Strengthened glass bulb for a cathode ray tube |
6232712, | Nov 13 1998 | Samsung Display Devices Co., Ltd. | Cathode ray tube having specific thickness ratio |
6388373, | Aug 17 1998 | LG Electronics Inc | Semi-flat CRT panel |
RE36838, | Nov 16 1993 | Asahi Glass Company Ltd | Glass bulb for a cathode ray and a method of producing the same |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jul 18 2001 | JEONG, SEONG-HAN | LG ELECTRONICS, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012084 | /0870 | |
Aug 15 2001 | LG Electronics Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 10 2005 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Dec 29 2006 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Feb 28 2011 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jul 22 2011 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jul 22 2006 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jan 22 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 22 2007 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jul 22 2009 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jul 22 2010 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jan 22 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 22 2011 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jul 22 2013 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jul 22 2014 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jan 22 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 22 2015 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jul 22 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |