An e-plane waveguide is provided comprising a housing having opposed walls defining a waveguide channel. The waveguide includes at least two elements spaced apart in a direction along the waveguide channel and disposed between and spaced from the opposed walls, and which define a resonant cavity therebetween with the waveguide channel. At least one of the walls has first and second protrusions which are spaced apart in a direction along the waveguide channel and protrude into the waveguide channel. The spacing between the protrusions is less than half a wavelength of the resonant frequency of the resonant cavity.
|
20. A resonator for resonating an rf wave having a predetermined frequency and wavelength, the resonator comprising a resonant cavity having opposed walls and first and second elements disposed between said walls and displaced therefrom and spaced apart in a direction along said walls, and wherein at least one of said walls has first and second regions spaced apart in a direction of the spacing between said elements, and a third region between said first and second regions, wherein said first and second regions extend into said cavity relative to said third region, and the spacing between said first and second regions in a direction along said wall is such as to prevent resonance between said first and second regions of said predetermined frequency.
23. A waveguide comprising a channel for receiving electromagnetic waves and having opposed walls, the surface of at least one of said opposed walls being defined by at least two projections spaced apart in a direction along the length of said channel, wherein the spacing between the projections in a direction along the length of the channel is less than half a predetermined resonant wavelength of electromagnetic waves to be passed by said waveguide, and
an element between said opposed walls and extending in a direction along the length of said channel and defining an aperture through said element, the dimension of said aperture in a direction along the length of said channel defining said predetermined resonant wavelength, and wherein at least a portion of at least one of said projections is positioned opposite said aperture.
14. A housing section for an e-plane waveguide comprising a first wall and a second wall for forming part of said waveguide and for defining part of a waveguide channel, said first wall adjoining said second wall, and said first wall spacing said second wall from a septum of said e-plane waveguide, and wherein the side of said second wall which faces the waveguide channel has first and second regions spaced apart in a direction along said housing section, and a third region positioned between said first and second regions, said first and second regions protruding from said second wall relative to said third region, and wherein the spacing between said first and second regions in a direction along the waveguide housing section is such that resonance between said first and second regions of the frequency to be resonated within a cavity of an e-plane waveguide formed by said housing section is prevented.
1. An e-plane waveguide comprising a housing having opposed walls and defining a waveguide channel therebetween,
at least two elements spaced apart in a direction along the waveguide channel and defining an aperture therebetween, said elements being disposed between and spaced from said opposed walls and defining a resonant cavity therebetween with said waveguide channel, wherein at least one of said opposed walls has both respective first and second regions separated in a direction along said waveguide channel, at least one of said first and second regions being disposed opposite said aperture defined between said elements, and a respective third region between said first and second regions, and wherein said first and second regions protrude into said waveguide channel relative to said third region, and the spacing between said first and second regions in a direction along said waveguide channel is less than half a wavelength of the resonant frequency of said resonant cavity.
2. An e-plane waveguide as claimed in
3. An e-plane waveguide as claimed in
4. An e-plane waveguide as claimed in
5. An e-plane waveguide as claimed in
6. An e-plane waveguide as claimed in
(a) the distance which said first and second regions extend into said waveguide channel relative to said third region, (b) the dimension of said first and second regions in a direction along the length of said waveguide channel, and (c) the dimension of said first and second regions in a direction transverse to said waveguide channel.
7. An e-plane waveguide as claimed in
9. An e-plane waveguide as claimed in
10. An e-plane waveguide as claimed in
11. An e-plane waveguide as claimed in
12. An e-plane waveguide as claimed in
13. An e-plane waveguide as claimed in
15. A housing section as claimed in
16. A housing section as claimed in
17. A housing section as claimed in
18. A housing section as claimed in
19. A housing section as claimed in
21. A resonator as claimed in
22. A resonator as claimed in
24. A waveguide as claimed in
25. An e-plane waveguide as claimed in
|
This application claims the benefit of Provisional Application No. 60/241,000, filed Oct. 18, 2000.
The present invention relates to waveguide filters and in particular, but not limited to waveguide filters for RF waves.
Radio transmitters and receivers require filters to remove or suppress unwanted frequencies from being transmitting or received. The transmitter portion of the radio may generate frequencies which will interfere with the radio system, or which may be prohibited by the radio frequency spectrum governing body. The receiver may need to suppress unwanted signals at different frequencies generated by the transmitter, or received from an external source, which would adversely affect the performance of the receiver.
At millimeter-wave frequencies sources of unwanted frequencies include the local oscillator frequency, image frequencies from the mixer, and the transmitter frequencies (in the case of the receiver). The frequencies generated by the mixer and the local oscillator are functions of the selected radio architecture. The closer the oscillator frequency (or its harmonics) is to the transmitter frequencies, the more difficult it is to remove the undesired frequency. However, wider spaced frequencies may result in more complex circuitry resulting in a more expensive radio implementation. A small separation between the transmit and receive frequencies can result in unwanted high power transmit frequencies leaking into the receiver. The separation between the transmit and receive frequencies is usually specified by the licensing bodies and the system operators. The radio designer may not have control over this specification.
To suppress the unwanted frequencies below an acceptable power level, a filter element is required in the signal path. The filter element discriminates between the desired and undesired frequencies based on the wavelengths of the signals. At millimeter-wave frequencies the difference between the wavelengths is very small, resulting a in very high manufacturing tolerances.
A common millimeter-wave filter is based on the metal rectangular waveguide, an example of which is shown in
For the filter to discriminate between closely spaced frequencies, the physical dimensions must be extremely accurate. In practice it is difficult and costly to achieve the required dimensional accuracy. Historically many millimeter-wave applications did not require high volume production, and thus the investment to achieve the necessary accuracy was not warranted. Adjustable tuning screws were included in the design and after manufacture and assembly each filter was individually tuned, manually or automatically, to achieve the desired frequency response.
The use of tuning screws results in increased costs when compared to machined or case filters due to the more complicated assembly and tuning steps in the manufacturing process. Examples of these filters are disclosed in the publications of commercial millimeter-wave waveguide filter or diplexer component manufacturers, such as Microwave Development Company Inc., Lark Engineering, or X&L Microwave Inc.
A typical metal insert or E-plane filter is shown in
A benefit of the metal insert filter is that the same housing can be used for different filters at different frequencies. Only the metal insert piece needs to be changed, and there is not a significant setup charge for changes in the metal insert piece.
To achieve the tight filtering requirements for closely spaced local oscillator and transmit frequencies, or between transmit and receive frequencies, for LMDS (Local Multipoint Distribution Service) radio applications the accuracy of the depth of the waveguide housing needs to be better than +/-1 mil. This level of accuracy can be achieved with quality machining, but is expensive to achieve for volume production.
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided an E-plane waveguide comprising a housing having opposed walls and defining a waveguide channel therebetween, at least two elements spaced apart in a direction along the waveguide channel and disposed between and spaced from said opposed walls and defining a resonant cavity therebetween with said waveguide channel, wherein at least one of said walls has first and second regions separated in a direction along said waveguide channel, at least one of said first and second regions being disposed opposite the aperture formed between said elements, and a third region between said first and second regions, and wherein said first and second regions protrude into said waveguide channel relative to said third region, and the spacing between said first and second regions in a direction along said waveguide channel is less than half a wavelength of the resonant frequency of said resonant cavity.
Advantageously, the inventors have found that providing the cavity wall with a structured surface having protrusions which extend into the cavity can significantly reduce the frequency shift of a waveguide filter due to errors in the width of the waveguide channel caused by the manufacturing process.
In one embodiment, at least one of the first and second regions comprises a discrete protrusion extending into the cavity relative to the third region.
In one embodiment, at least one dimension of the first region or protrusion is different from at least one corresponding dimension of the second region or protrusion. Advantageously, this feature may promote statistical variations in the manufacturing error by increasing the chance that protrusions having different dimensions will be subjected to slightly different manufacturing process conditions.
In one embodiment, the maximum dimension of the or each discrete protrusion transverse to a line perpendicular to the plane of the wall from which the or each protrusion extends is less than or equal to the spacing between itself and the other region or protrusion. Advantageously, this feature allows the protrusions to be rotated, for example for the purpose of adjusting their height and is particularly advantageous in the design and testing of a template of a waveguide housing section, which may be used to produce a cast or mold.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a housing section for an E-plane waveguide comprising a first wall and a second wall for forming part of said waveguide, said first wall adjoining said second wall, and in use, said first wall spacing said second wall from a septum of said E-plane waveguide, and wherein the side of said second wall which, in use, faces the waveguide channel, has said first and second regions spaced apart in a direction along said housing section, and a third region being positioned between said first and second regions, said first and second regions protruding from said second wall relative to said third region, and wherein the spacing between said first and second regions in a direction along the waveguide housing section is such that resonance of the frequency to be resonated within a cavity of an E-plane waveguide formed by said housing section is prevented.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a cast for manufacturing a waveguide housing section, the cast of having a form adapted to form a waveguide housing section as described herein.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of forming a cast for manufacturing a waveguide housing section, comprising the steps of: forming a template waveguide housing section, the waveguide housing section comprising a waveguide channel wall having a plurality of projections extending from the wall and being spaced apart along the wall, and forming a cast which conforms to the shape of said wall containing said projections.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a waveguide filter having a opposed walls and defining a channel therebetween, wherein the surface of at least one of the walls defining the channel defines a plurality of projections spaced apart in a direction along the length of the channel, wherein the spacing between adjacent projections is less than half a wavelength of the RF signal intended to be passed by the filter.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a resonator for resonating an RF wave having a predetermined frequency and wavelength, the resonator comprising a resonant cavity having a wall, the wall having first, second and third regions, the third region being positioned between the fist and second regions, wherein the first and second regions protrude into the cavity relative to the third region wherein the distance between the first and second regions is less than half said predetermined wavelength.
In one embodiment, at least one of said first and second regions comprises a discrete protrusion extending into the cavity relative to the third region.
One embodiment further comprises one or more spaced apart further regions which protrude into said cavity relative to said third region, wherein the closest separation between adjacent projecting regions is less than half said predetermined wavelength.
In one embodiment, the closest separation between at least two projecting regions is one third of said predetermined wavelength or less.
According to the present invention there is further provided a resonator for resonating an RF wave having a predetermined frequency and wavelength comprising a resonant cavity having at least two spaced apart projections on the same side of said cavity, the ends of said projections defining part of the wall of said cavity, the distance between said projections being less than half said predetermined wavelength.
According to the present invention, there is also provided a waveguide comprising a channel for receiving electromagnetic waves and having opposed walls, the inside surface of at least one of said opposed walls being defined by at least two projections, spaced apart in a direction along the length of said channel, wherein the distance between the projections in a direction along the length of the channel is less than half the predetermined wavelength of electromagnetic waves to be passed through said waveguide.
In one embodiment the maximum dimension across the end of at least one projection defining the wall of the channel, in direction along the length of the channel is less than a half of said predetermined wavelength.
In one embodiment a portion a portion of each of said opposed walls of said channel are defined by at least two said projections.
One embodiment further comprises an element between said opposed walls and extending in a direction along the length of said channel and defining an aperture therethrough, the dimension of said aperture in direction along the length of said channel defining said predetermined resonant wavelength of said RF wave, at least a portion of at least one of said projections being positioned opposite said aperture.
In one embodiment the element comprises a plurality of apertures positioned successively along the length of said channel, a dimension of each aperture along the length of said channel defining a resonant wavelength of an RF wave to be passes through said waveguide.
In one embodiment at least one aperture defines a different resonant wavelength to another said aperture.
Examples of embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to drawings, in which:
Referring to
Generally, in manufacturing known waveguide housings in which the inner walls of the housing are flat, any error in the depth of the waveguide channel, caused by manufacturing tolerances, is likely to be constant along the length of the waveguide channel, and produces a frequency shift dependent on the size of the error. For example, depending on the intended pass frequency, an error of 0.001 inches can cause a frequency shift of 70 MHz.
In embodiments of the present invention, the provision of projections along the waveguide channel wall which wall determines the pass or operating frequency, allows statistical variations, caused by the manufacturing process, to be introduced in the height "h" of the projections (i.e. the extent to which the projections extend from the wall) and therefore in the depth of the waveguide channel that determines the operating frequency. The depth of the waveguide channel will therefore not be constant along the waveguide due to the statistical independence of feature dimensions for manufacturing processes such as casting and molding. The height of some projections will be less than the desired height, and therefore the depth "d" of the waveguide channel will be greater than desired, while the height "h" of other projections will be greater than the desired height and therefore the depth "d" of the waveguide channel will be less than desired. The inventors have found that the operating frequency is dependent on the average depth of the waveguide channel, so that the variations in the height of the projections causes an averaging effect with the result that the average depth more closely approaches the desired depth for the particular operating frequency. The magnitude of the frequency shift of the filter is a function of the average height of the projections, and the averaging effect has been found to produce significantly less frequency shift than the relatively uniform error that results when manufacturing a flat surface waveguide housing.
The structured surface waveguide housing is easier and cheaper to mass produce than a typical flat surface waveguide because the manufacturing tolerances are reduced.
By way of example, the tolerance on the depth of a flat surface waveguide needs to be 1% to achieve a frequency response within a specified range. To achieve the same maximum shift of the frequency response within this specified range using a structured surface waveguide housing with four ribs per resonator section (i.e. two on each side of the cavity), the required tolerance on the depth of the waveguide channel (measured from the ends of the ribs) can be relaxed to 2%. This is due to the statistically independent nature of the variance of the depth of each rib. If there are 5 resonator sections in the filter, then for the same example the manufacturing tolerance can be relaxed further to 4.5%. Distortion in the frequency response or limited statistical independence between adjacent ribs may limit the required tolerance to less than 4.5%.
For high volume precision metal casting or plastic molding, the averaging affect of the statistical variation of the height of the ribs results in lower accuracy requirements for the manufacture of the waveguide housing. The manufacturing of the complete filter unit incorporating the invention has a higher yield for a lower cost than standard waveguide manufacturing technology.
The specific height of the ribs does not significantly impact the frequency of the filter. However, in one embodiment, the height of the projections should be sufficient to allow statistical variations in the height between different projections to be introduced by the manufacturing process. The likelihood of introducing such variations may be increased by increasing the height of the projections so that the ends are further away from the surface of the wall from which they extend. By way of example, the height of the projections may be at least 0.03 inches, for example in the range of 0.03 and 0.1 inches or more.
In one embodiment, the same height may be selected for all projections. In another embodiment, different heights may be selected for different projections to increase the probability that different projections will be subjected to different manufacturing conditions, so that the process-induced error in the projection height will be different for different projections. For example, different heights may be deliberately selected for adjacent projections which, due to their proximity, are more likely otherwise to be subjected to the same manufacturing conditions and therefore to the same process-induced height error. In casting or molding, process-induced errors in the height of the projections may be caused by differences in temperature, rate of change of temperature, pressure or rate of change of pressure between different positions of the waveguide housing. By imposing a variation in the height of different projections, some projections will have parts which are further away from the waveguide wall from which they extend than other projections, and therefore may be subjected to different manufacturing conditions such as temperature and pressure.
The spacing between the ribs or other projections should be less than one half of the guide wavelength at the frequency of operation. For example, the spacing between adjacent projections along the length of the waveguide may be in the range of ⅕ to ⅓ of the waveguide length at the frequency of operation. Generally, the minimum spacing between adjacent projections should be sufficient to enable the projection to be manufactured by the desired manufacturing process.
The width of the projections i.e. their dimension in a direction along the length of the waveguide should also be less than half the wavelength of the operating frequency. Preferably the width is sufficient to allow the projections to be formed by the manufacturing process with sufficient strength and integrity for the intended use.
The dimension of the projections in a direction transverse to their width, i.e. their length, can be any suitable size. The length generally is not critical or required to prevent resonance in that direction, since the height of the waveguide channel is usually less than half the wavelength of the operating frequency. However, preferably the length of its projections is sufficient to provide the desired or requisite strength. For example, the ratio of the height to the length of the projections may be 1:1.
The presence of the gap between adjacent projections may have an effect on the value of the operating frequency and may have to be considered in determining the critical transverse distance between the channel walls or the depth of the waveguide channel. Generally, the critical transverse dimension of the waveguide channel that determines the frequency of operation is the distance between the opposed channel walls. If projections are provided on both walls, and for a given wall are selected to have a constant height, the critical dimension may be measured between the two planes containing the end of the projections on both walls. If the projections on one or both walls have different selected heights, the position from which the critical dimension is measured may be the plane containing the average selected height of the projections. If one wall of the waveguide channel is flat, the critical dimension may be measured from the appropriate plane containing projections, as defined above, and the opposed flat wall.
One method which may be employed to determine the required dimension between the channel walls and therefore the height of the projections for a desired operating frequency is firstly to determine the distance between opposite sides of a waveguide with flat sides for the desired operating frequency and then to reduce this distance slightly to compensate for the effect of the gap between adjacent projections. In the case of an embodiment having projections on both sides of the waveguide housing, the compensated distance is the distance between two planes containing the ends of projections having an average height on each side of the waveguide housing, and in the case of an embodiment with projections on one side of the waveguide housing only, the compensated distance is the distance between a plane containing the ends of projections having an average height over the projections on one side of the housing and the flat wall on the opposite side of the housing.
Advantageously, the use of posts may facilitate the manufacture of a cast or mold for forming the or each waveguide housing section. In the original template of the waveguide housing section used to form the cast, the posts may be screwed into the waveguide wall which allows their height to be easily adjusted by turning the posts. The performance of the template itself may be tested in one or more implementations of a waveguide, and its performance finally tuned by adjusting the height of the projections. Once the tuning process is complete, a cast can be made directly from the template.
In other embodiments of the present invention, at least one the shape, size and placement of projections along one side of the waveguide channel can be different from that of projections along the other side of the waveguide channel. An example of such an embodiment is illustrated in
A plurality of projections 217, 219, 221, are provided along one of the waveguide channel walls 203, and a plurality of projections 223, 225, are provided along the other waveguide channel wall 205. In this embodiment, the spacing "s1" between the projections 217, 219, 221 on one side of the waveguide channel is different from the spacing "s2" of the projections 223, 225 on the other side of the waveguide channel. Both spacings, "s1" and "s2" are less than half the wavelength of the resonant frequency to prevent resonance of this frequency between the projections. In this embodiment, the width of the projections (i.e. the dimension of the projections along the length of the waveguide channel) "w1" of the projections 217, 219, 221, on one side of the waveguide channel is different from the width "w2" of the projections 223, 225, along the other side of the waveguide channel. Also, in this embodiment, the position of the projections 217, 219, 221, along one side of the waveguide channel are offset in a direction along the waveguide channel relative to the projections 223, 225, along the other side of the waveguide channel.
The height of the projections along one side of the waveguide channel may be different from the height of the projections along the other side of the waveguide channel, and/or the shape of projections along one side of the waveguide channel may vary relative to one another.
Further examples of projection arrangements which may implemented in embodiments of the present invention are shown in
Embodiments of a waveguide housing section may incorporate one or more projections having any one or a combination of any two as in one of the features of the projection arrangements described above. In other embodiments, a projection, or its upper surface may be discontinuous between the first and third walls of the waveguide channel.
As described above, equivalent implementations of the structured waveguide surface that achieve the same or similar results include, but are not limited to, varying the rib height, varying the height along each rib (e.g. sawtooth pattern), using posts in place of the ribs, using multiple posts in the place of the ribs, varying the post height, and varying the post placement as well as others.
Advantages of embodiments of the invention over conventional, flat waveguide surfaces are the cost savings of avoiding post-assembly tuning and the enabling of the use of mass production casting or molding processes for the manufacturing of frequency specific components, such as filter, at millimeter-wave frequencies.
The uses and applications of embodiments of the invention include but are not limited to frequency or dimensionally sensitive components such as waveguide filters, for example to band pass and band stop filters as well as others, and waveguide diplexers, as well as other applications. Embodiments of the invention are particularly applicable at millimeter-wave frequencies due to the short wavelengths and high dimensional accuracy requirements.
Any of the features of the embodiments described herein may be combined with any other features.
Modifications to the embodiments described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art,
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11462810, | Jan 05 2017 | Intel Corporation | Multiplexer and combiner structures embedded in a mmwave connector interface |
6917266, | Oct 11 2000 | Microwave waveguide | |
7023302, | Jan 14 2004 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Slow-wave structure for ridge waveguide |
7132909, | Oct 11 2000 | Paul, Mack | Microwave waveguide |
7263760, | Jan 14 2004 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Method for making a slow-wave ridge waveguide structure |
7288944, | Jul 11 2005 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | Evanescent waveguide apparatus and method for measurement of dielectric constant |
8928433, | Jun 23 2008 | NEC Corporation | Waveguide filter |
9799937, | Apr 02 2013 | TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET L M ERICSSON PUBL | Waveguide E-plane filter structure |
9899716, | Mar 01 2015 | TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON PUBL | Waveguide E-plane filter |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3271706, | |||
3587008, | |||
3597710, | |||
3949327, | Aug 01 1974 | Sage Laboratories, Inc. | Waveguide low pass filter |
4800349, | Sep 18 1986 | ALCATEL THOMSON FAISCEAUX HERTZIENS, 55 RUE GREFFULHE 92301 LEVALLOIS PERRET CEDEX, FRANCE | E-plane type wide band composite filter |
4833428, | Dec 04 1986 | EMS Technologies Canada, LTD | 14/12 GHz Duplexer |
6181224, | Nov 21 1997 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Waveguide filter with a resonator cavity having inner and outer edges of different lengths |
6392508, | Mar 28 2000 | Apple Inc | Tuneable waveguide filter and method of design thereof |
6476696, | Oct 02 2000 | Waveguide for microwave manipulation | |
JP57041702, | |||
JP57070942, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 18 2001 | Dragonwave, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Oct 18 2001 | COOPER, MICHAEL | DRAGONWAVE, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012265 | /0543 | |
Mar 31 2005 | DRAGONWAVE INC | COMERICA BANK | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 023220 | /0567 | |
Apr 14 2008 | DRAGONWAVE INC | 4472314 CANADA INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023882 | /0101 | |
Feb 29 2012 | 4472314 CANADA INC | DRAGONWAVE INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027784 | /0448 | |
Jun 01 2012 | DRAGONWAVE INC | COMERICA BANK, A TEXAS BANKING ASSOCIATION AND AUTHORIZED FOREIGN BANK UNDER THE BANK ACT CANADA , AS AGENT | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 028342 | /0462 | |
Oct 24 2017 | DRAGONWAVE INC | DRAGONWAVE-X CANADA, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 048532 FRAME: 0237 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT | 050479 | /0422 | |
Oct 24 2017 | DRAGONWAVE INC | TRANSFORM-X, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 048532 | /0237 | |
Sep 24 2019 | DRAGONWAVE-X CANADA, INC | DRAGONWAVE-X, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 050476 | /0639 | |
Jul 14 2022 | DRAGONWAVE-X, LLC | COMS IP HOLDINGS, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 060713 | /0728 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 13 2004 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
May 09 2007 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Jan 31 2011 | M2552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity. |
May 26 2015 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
May 26 2015 | STOL: Pat Hldr no Longer Claims Small Ent Stat |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 02 2006 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 02 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 02 2007 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 02 2009 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 02 2010 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 02 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 02 2011 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 02 2013 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 02 2014 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 02 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 02 2015 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 02 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |