A frequency selective improved directivity of a return loss bridge is achieved by generating a counteractive reflected energy vector to cancel a reflected energy vector caused by imperfections, such as parasitic effects and an unbalanced balun, in the return loss bridge. The counteractive reflected energy vector of equal magnitude, but opposite in phase, to the undesired reflected energy vector may be induced into a transmission path between a test port and a coupled port. An open circuit stub in the transmission path between the test port and the coupled port may be used to provide the counteractive reflected energy vector. Alternatively a path across a coupling resistor in a return loss path coupled from the test port to the coupled port may be used to provide the counteractive reflected energy vector, with PIN diodes in the coupled path being used for tunability if desired.
|
1. A return loss bridge having improved directivity in the presence of imperfections, the return loss bridge having a transmission port with a balun coupled to a test port to form a transmission path and a coupled port coupled to the test port through a coupling resistor, comprising:
means coupled in the transmission path between the test port and the coupled port for counteracting reflected energy at the coupled port due to the imperfections to produce the improved directivity.
2. The return loss bridge as recited in
means in the transmission path between the coupling resistor and the test port for inducing a counteractive reflected energy vector having a magnitude equal to the magnitude of an apparent directivity vector for the return loss bridge; and means in the transmission path between the coupling resistor and the test port for adjusting the phase of the counteractive reflected energy vector to be opposite to the phase of the apparent directivity vector.
3. The return loss bridge as recited in
4. The return loss bridge as recited in
5. The return loss bridge as recited in
6. The return loss bridge as recited in
a pair of directional couplers, one coupled in the transmission path between the test port and the coupling resistor and the other coupled to the coupled port, having a coupling coefficient such that the magnitude of the counteractive reflected energy vector at the coupled port is equal to the magnitude of the apparent directivity vector; and a transmission line coupled between the directional couplers having a length such that the phase of the counteractive reflected energy vector at the coupled port is opposite to the phase of the apparent directivity vector.
7. The return loss bridge as recited in
8. The return loss bridge as recited in
a PIN diode used as a variable resistance to control the magnitude of the counteractive reflected energy vector at the coupled port to be equal to the magnitude of the apparent directivity vector; and a PIN diode phase adjustor in a load path for the coupling means to control the phase of the counteractive reflected energy vector at the coupled port to be opposite to the phase of the apparent directivity vector.
9. The return loss bridge as recited in
|
The present invention relates to a frequency domain instrument, and more particularly to frequency selective improvement of the directivity of a return loss bridge.
A return loss bridge is a three-port device in which a coupled port directionally couples a fixed amount of radio frequency (RF) energy from a transmission path between a transmission port and a test port, i.e., the bridge couples some energy to the coupled port from an energy wave traveling along the transmission path in a reverse direction and rejects energy from an energy wave traveling in a forward direction. Therefore the return loss bridge may be used to measure the return loss--reflected power relative to incident power--of a load terminating the energy wave in the forward direction at the test port. There is a finite difference between the coupled and rejected energy at the coupled port as there is not perfect rejection of the energy wave in the forward direction. This is a figure of merit of the bridge known as "directivity." Directivity is defined as the difference, usually in dB, in the power at the coupled port when the test port is terminated in a fully reflected load--open or shorted--and in a perfect nonreflective load of the same characteristic impedance or at least a load that is much better than the directivity of the bridge.
A schematic for an ideal bridge (without parasitic effects) is shown in FIG. 1. The coefficient k is a trade-off chosen depending upon the amount of coupling desired at the coupled port P3 versus the loss incurred in the transmission path between the transmission port P1 and the test port P2. Energy in the forward direction travels from port P1 to port P2, and energy in the reverse direction travels from port P2 to port P1 with a portion coupled to port P3 by a coupling resistor R0/k. A measurement instrument receiver is connected to port P3 while a measurement instrument transmitter is connected to port P1 and a system under test is connected to port P2. A representative value of k=0.2 provides about -17 dB of coupling (S22) and about -2 dB of loss (S21), as shown in FIG. 2. With an ideal balun and no parasitic effects in the circuit the directivity is infinite, i.e., none of the energy wave in the forward direction is coupled to port P3. However a ferrite encased coaxial balun does not provide a perfectly balanced output and causes the directivity to be finite. This finite directivity is defined as an inherent directivity. The inherent directivity is primarily determined by the unbalance provided by the balun formed by the ferrite encased coaxial line assuming no other parasitic effects in the rest of the circuit. If the parasitic effects are kept to a minimum by compact part placement and short line lengths, in particular the length and transitions between port P2 and the coupling resistor R0/k, an inherent directivity of >30 dB up to very high frequencies, such as 3 GHz, may be achieved.
However there are situations where, in order to fit the bridge into a specific package, an implementation of the bridge is built that introduces significant parasitic effects. For example where the bridge is built on a circuit board having both sides etched, having via hole transitions, and having a right angle SNA to N cable placed between port P2 and resistor R0/k, all of these discontinuities conspire to degrade the measured or apparent directivity of the bridge. This occurs because the discontinuities in the characteristic impedance of the line cause reflections of the energy wave in the forward direction between port P1 and port P2 before it has a chance to dissipate in the perfect termination at port P2. These reflections couple to port P3 and sum with the energy which is at port P3 due to the inherent directivity caused by imbalance (see FIG. 11). Together the two vectors representing the undesired reflected energy due to parasitic effects and the inherent directivity due to the unbalance of the balun sum to the apparent directivity vector.
To improve the directivity where there are significant parasitic effects, the parasitic effects could be tuned out, depending upon the highest frequency for which the bridge is specified. However at high frequencies, such as 2.5 GHz, it is difficult, if not impossible, to tune two right angle transitions for a return loss on the order of >30 dB. If it were possible, the apparent directivity would return to the inherent directivity without the discontinuities. Therefore the directivity of the bridge is still limited to the inherent directivity.
What is desired is a method of improving the apparent or inherent directivity of a return loss bridge when there are imperfections introduced by the implementation architecture, especially in a frequency region of interest.
Accordingly the present invention provides a method of frequency selective improvement of the directivity of a return loss bridge by creating a counteractive reflected energy vector at a coupled port that cancels an apparent directivity vector over a desired frequency range. The counteractive reflected energy vector is the vector sum of an inherent directivity vector due to unbalance of a balun and a reflected energy vector from undesired energy reflections caused by parasitic effects in a transmission path between a transmission port and a test port of the bridge. One embodiment inserts an open circuit stub between a coupling resistor and the test port together with a length of transmission line to induce the counteractive reflected energy vector in the transmission path. The magnitude of the counteractive reflected energy vector is determined by the size of the open circuit stub and is made equal to the magnitude of the apparent directivity vector, and the phase is 180°C opposed to that of the apparent directivity vector as determined by the length of the transmission line between the coupling resistor and the open circuit stub. Alternatively to avoid degrading the return loss of the test port--another figure of merit of the bridge--caused by the first embodiment, energy may be coupled from the transmission path between the coupling resistor and the test port to the coupled port with directional couplers. The coupling coefficient of the couplers determines the magnitude of the counteractive reflected energy vector at the coupled port, which magnitude is set to be equal to that of the apparent directivity vector. The path between the couplers includes a transmission line, the length of which determines the phase of the counteractive energy vector at the coupled port to be in opposition to the phase of the apparent directivity vector. The transmission line and couplers may be enhanced with PIN diodes to provide tunability. In this case the coupling coefficient provides a counteractive vector whose magnitude is greater than the apparent directivity vector, and the PIN diodes are tuned to adjust the counteractive reflected energy vector magnitude and phase at the coupled port to provide improved directivity over the desired frequency range.
The objects, advantages and other novel features of the present invention are apparent from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the appended claims and attached drawing.
Referring now to
One solution is to induce an opposing parasitic effect 12 along the line between the coupling resistor R0/k and port P2 which induces a counteractive reflected energy vector that has the same magnitude but is opposite in phase to the apparent directivity vector at port P1 due to the significant parasitic effects. The magnitude and phase may be controlled by the amount and type--capacitive or inductive or both--of the induced opposing parasitic effect 12 to create a null in the apparent directivity at a desired frequency. For example as shown in
There is a drawback to this implementation, as shown in
The coupling embodiment is a simplified version.
Thus the present invention provides frequency selective improved apparent or inherent directivity for a return loss bridge having imperfections by inducing or coupling energy of equal magnitude and opposite phase in the path between a test port and a coupled port to counteract the reflected energy caused by such imperfections.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11157057, | May 28 2020 | OVH | Systems and methods for electric systems monitoring and/or failure detection |
11281267, | Jun 08 2018 | OVH | Methods and systems for identifying a connection path between a power source and a load |
11489553, | Apr 13 2021 | OVH | System and method for identifying a connection between a power distribution unit and an electric device |
7126347, | Dec 30 2005 | Anritsu Company | Precision wideband 50 Ohm input and 50 Ohm output or 100 Ohm output differential reflection bridge |
9823284, | May 03 2012 | ROHDE & SCHWARZ GMBH & CO KG | Ultra-wide band measurement bridge |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2778993, | |||
3611123, | |||
4644260, | Aug 05 1985 | Motorola, Inc. | Coupler with coupled line used to cancel finite directivity |
4962359, | Jun 29 1989 | Agilent Technologies Inc | Dual directional bridge and balun used as reflectometer test set |
6049212, | Jul 20 1995 | Anritsu Company | Connector saving adapters and SWR bridge configuration allowing multiple connector types to be used with a single SWR bridge |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 28 2002 | DELEBROUX, DONALD J | Tektronix, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 014809 | /0887 | |
Mar 01 2002 | Tektronix, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jul 13 2007 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jul 19 2007 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Feb 15 2011 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Feb 15 2011 | RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned. |
Aug 04 2011 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 18 2015 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Feb 10 2016 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Feb 10 2007 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Aug 10 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 10 2008 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Feb 10 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Feb 10 2011 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Aug 10 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 10 2012 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Feb 10 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Feb 10 2015 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Aug 10 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 10 2016 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Feb 10 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |