A reflective surface behind an image to be scanned on an optical image scanner, copier, facsimile machine or similar device. Preferably, the reflective surface has a reflectance less than 90% with a preferred reflectance range of 60% to 75%. This reflective surface is substantially integral with the scanner, copier or facsimile lid surface and substantially reduces image bleed-through while resulting in an acceptable level of color shift and an acceptable loss of dynamic range relative to a white surface. In a second embodiment, the reflective surface is interchangeable by the end user in order to optimize the reflectance of the reflective surface for any given document to be scanned, copied, or faxed.
|
1. An image processing device for transforming an image into an electronic signal, said image processing device comprising:
a surface for supporting an original; a lid for covering a back side of the original supported on the surface of said supporting member, said lid having a light reflecting surface opposed to the supporting surface, said reflecting surface being of the same material as said lid, said light reflecting surface being easily removed and replaced by a user of said image processing device, such that said user is able to interchange reflecting surfaces of varying reflectance in said lid, so that the reflecting surface may be changed to optimize the reflectance of the reflecting surface for any document to be processed by said image processing device; a light source for illuminating the original supported on the support surface; photodetector for producing an electric signal in response to light reflected by the original; and means for processing said electric signal produced by said photodetector.
2. The image processing device according to
3. The image processing device according to
4. The image processing device according to
5. The image processing device of
6. The image processing device of
|
This application is a continuation-in-part of 08/610,032, filed Mar. 4, 1996, now abandon.
This invention relates generally to scanners, copiers, facsimile machines and other devices used for transforming an optical image of a document into a electronic signal and more specifically to a reflective surface used behind a document to be imaged.
Electronic document scanners, copiers, and facsimile machines transform an optical image of a document into an electric signal suitable for storing, displaying, printing or electronic transmission. Documents to be scanned may generally be classified as either transparent or opaque. For opaque documents, light is reflected off an image on the surface of the document onto a photosensitive transducer, typically a photoconductive drum or an array of photosensitive sensor elements. However, documents are rarely completely opaque. In a typical device, some light passes through the document to a secondary reflective surface, for example a lid or automatic document feeder. Some light then reflects off the secondary reflective surface and passes back through the document a second time. The light that passes through the document twice may also be detected by the photosensitive transducer. If the document has an image on both sides, the image adjacent to the secondary reflective surface may be partially imaged onto the photosensitive transducer. For example, when copying double sided documents, sometimes an image on the back of the document partially appears in the resulting copy. This undesirable result is often called "bleed-through." There is a need for reduction of bleed-through in copiers, scanners, facsimile machines and similar devices.
An improved document lid and secondary reflective surface is provided that minimizes bleed-through and other image parameters of interest, such as brightness, contrast and color shift. The document lid and secondary reflective surface also permits a cost and labor savings in the lid and permits the lid to be recycled.
The
The figure is also simplified in that it shows only the specularly reflected light (light reflected from an object at a reflection angle equal to the incident angle) and not the scatteredly reflected light (all light reflected from an object at reflection angles not equal to the incident angle, sometimes referred to as diffuse light) which is also present. The amount of reflected light (specularly reflected light plus scatteredly reflected light) is substantially equal to the amount of incident light 108 less the amount of light absorbed by reflecting objects 100 and 104. The "reflectance" of an object is the ratio of its reflected light to its incident light. As is well known in the art, sensor 118 of an optical scanner may be positioned as shown in
The secondary reflected light rays 116 are of particular concern when scanning or copying color images, where accurate (as perceived by the human visual system) color reproduction is needed. One way to eliminate secondary reflected light rays and resulting bleed-through is to make surface 114 non-reflective (black). However, a black surface may create other undesirable effects as follows. First, consider dynamic range (or contrast) of an image, which is the difference in reflectance between the darkest part of the image (sometimes called shadow) and the lightest part of the image (sometimes called highlight). Document 100 is typically paper. If light is permitted to reflect back through the light areas of an image, the light areas appear to be whiter, increasing the effective dynamic range. For an extreme example, consider an image on thin tissue paper. When viewed on a white background, the light areas of the image will appear white. When viewed on a black background, the light areas will shift toward gray, reducing the dynamic range of the image. Second, a black background can cause a color shift. White paper typically acts as an optical filter, suppressing short wavelengths and passing long wavelengths. That is, white paper typically has a higher transmission for red and green wavelengths than for blue wavelengths. Again, using the extreme example of an image on thin tissue paper, when viewed on a white background, reds and greens appear relatively saturated and bright. When viewed on a black background, reds and greens appear less saturated. Subjectively, red tends to appear relatively dull or brick colored. Therefore, for both dynamic range and color shift reasons, a completely non-reflective surface 114 is not preferred.
In general, a secondary reflectance below about 30% may result in perceptible color shift and reduced dynamic range in typical color images on typical white paper. Preferably, the secondary reflectance should be at least 60% for subjectively acceptable color shift and dynamic range. At the other extreme, a reflectance greater than 90% may result in noticeable bleed-through on typical double-sided paper documents. A reflectance of less than 75% is desirable to reduce bleed-through. Therefore, a preferred range is reflectance in the range from 60% to 75% as an acceptable compromise, substantially reducing bleed-through but resulting in an acceptable reduction in dynamic range and an acceptable shift in perceived color.
Many commercial products are made from molded plastic in a tan or gray color that falls in the range of 60%-75% reflectance. Typically, copier lids and scanner lids have a separate white surface or are painted white. In accordance with the discussion above, in many cases it may be preferable to simply use the product plastic color with no modification, eliminating additional manufacturing cost. In addition, in scanners and other devices using arrays of charge-coupled devices, there is often a calibration strip used to measure sensor non-uniformity. The primary requirement for these calibration strips is for uniformity along the strip (and perhaps a consistent reflectivity among different strips). The cosmetic color requirements for plastic cases are often sufficient to permit use of the plastic case with no modification as a sensor uniformity calibration strip. Therefore, an unpainted lid may also provide uniformity calibration. As stated in the background, plastic copier or scanner lids are typically manufactured by means of injection molding. Then, layers of foam, adhesive, reflective film and transparent protective films are then attached to the surface of the copier or scanner lid adjacent the object surface.
As shown in
If the plastic scanner or copier lid 200 is reformed and used as the secondary reflective surface 202, there is substantial savings in terms of parts, materials and labor in the manufacturing of the scanner or copier, especially as the typical foam/film/adhesive reflector assembly is generally complicated to align and install on the underside of the scanner or copier lid. Moreover, the scanner lid 200 according to the present invention is recyclable, as a single plastic part. Whereas, scanner lids of the prior art are generally not recyclable as the foam/film/adhesive reflector assembly is generally not removable from the scanner lid or is very expensive and labor intensive to remove. Accordingly, the scanner or copier lid with a secondary reflective surface according to the present invention is capable of being recycled and prior art scanner or copier lids are not.
The Applicant has discovered that typically, a secondary reflective surface of substantially white is best for scanning/coping transparencies, a secondary reflective surface of substantially black is best for scanning/copier for OCR purposes, and a secondary reflective surface of substantially gray or 60%-75% reflectance is best for scanning/coping color documents. Accordingly, it would be optimum for the end user to be able to change the color of the secondary reflective surface based on the document to be scanned/copied.
It is relatively easy and straight forward to manufacture plastic reflective surfaces 302 of different predetermined colors to optimize the scanning/coping conditions for any given document. However, at the present time, it is believed that having reflective surfaces 302 in 3 colors (i.e., black, white, and gray/tan or putty) would meet the scanning/copying requirements for most documents. Thus, if the end user determines that he must scan or copy a transparency, he will merely slide or snap a white reflective surface 302 into the scanner/copier lid 300. If the end user determines that he needs to scan or copy a color document, he will merely slide or snap a gray, tan, putty of like color reflective surface 302 into the scanner/copier lid 300. If the end user determines that he needs to scan or copy a document for OCR purposes, he will merely slide or snap a black reflective surface 302 into the scanner/copier lid 300.
The scanner/copier according to this embodiment of the present invention permits the optimum scanning/copying conditions for almost all documents. It reduces manufacturing costs due to parts and labor. It permits the end user to determine which reflective surfaces 302 he will need. As the reflective surfaces 302 and the scanner/copier lid 300 are made entirely of injection molded plastic, rather than the typical layers of plastic, adhesive, foam, metal/plastic film, and plastic film, both the scanner/copier lid 300 and the reflective surface are able to be recycled.
The foregoing description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. For example, the reflective surface may be attached to the lid by any means available, such as screws or Velcro, not merely by means of a snap or sliding fit. Although it would be preferable that the attachment means be readily removed and refitted by any end user. It is a primary concept of the present invention that the reflective surface is capable of being recycled either by itself or with the integral scanner/copier lid. The foregoing description is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and other modifications and variations may be possible in light of the above teachings. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the appended claims be construed to include other alternative embodiments of the invention except insofar as limited by the prior art.
Graham, James J., Veazey, Judson, Batten, Patrick, Thelen, John, Dawe, Julie T.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4455577, | Aug 21 1981 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Original reader |
4623938, | Jun 07 1983 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Original image processing apparatus with improved cover |
4849793, | May 19 1986 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Image reading apparatus |
5278674, | Jan 25 1990 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Method and apparatus for providing illumination compensation in a document scanner |
5574542, | Feb 14 1996 | Agfa Corporation | Scanner cover |
5705254, | Mar 10 1994 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Plastic molded article with a finished surface appearance |
5790211, | Sep 08 1995 | Xerox Corporation | Platen cover for a digital document scanner with electrically switchable reflectance modes |
6064395, | Dec 27 1996 | BANDAI NAMCO ENTERTAINMENT INC | Apparatus and method of synthesizing images |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 30 1998 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Mar 04 1998 | BATTEN, PATRICK | Hewlett-Packard Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 009190 | /0858 | |
Mar 04 1998 | THELEN, JOHN | Hewlett-Packard Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 009190 | /0858 | |
Mar 09 1998 | GRAHAM, JAMES J | Hewlett-Packard Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 009190 | /0858 | |
Mar 09 1998 | VEAZEY, JUDSON | Hewlett-Packard Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 009190 | /0858 | |
Mar 09 1998 | DAWE, JULIE T | Hewlett-Packard Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 009190 | /0858 | |
May 20 1998 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Hewlett-Packard Company | MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 011523 | /0469 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jun 01 2007 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Dec 01 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 01 2008 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jun 01 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jun 01 2011 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Dec 01 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 01 2012 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jun 01 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jun 01 2015 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Dec 01 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 01 2016 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jun 01 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |