A method and system for ejection operation in an aircraft are provided. The system allows selection of one of two modes of ejection: ejecting through the canopy; and jettisoning the canopy before ejection. The system includes an ejection mode selector for selecting one of a canopy shattering ejection mode and a canopy jettison ejection mode, canopy shattering components, canopy jettison components, and an ejection actuator. The ejection actuator activates one of the canopy shattering components or the canopy jettison components based on the selected ejection mode.
|
1. A system for ejection from an aircraft, the system comprising:
an ejection mode selector for selecting one of a canopy shattering ejection mode or a canopy jettison ejection mode; canopy shattering components; canopy jettison components; and an ejection actuator for activating one of the canopy shattering components or the canopy jettison components based on the selected ejection mode.
10. An aircraft cockpit, the cockpit comprising:
a canopy; and an ejection seat including: an ejection mode selector for selecting one of a canopy shattering ejection mode or a canopy jettison ejection mode; canopy shattering components; canopy jettison components; and an ejection actuator for activating one of the canopy shattering components or the canopy jettison components based on the selected ejection mode. 19. A method for ejecting from an aircraft, the method comprising:
selecting one of a canopy shattering mode or a canopy jettison mode of ejection; performing canopy removal based on the selected mode; shattering the canopy and ejecting through the shattered canopy when the canopy shattering mode is selected; and jettisoning the canopy and ejecting through space previously occupied by the jettisoned canopy when the canopy jettison mode is selected.
2. The system of
5. The system of
7. The system of
8. The system of
9. The system of
11. The cockpit of
13. The cockpit of
14. The cockpit of
16. The cockpit of
17. The cockpit of
18. The cockpit of
20. The method of
21. The method of
|
This invention relates to copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/366,949, filed Feb. 13, 2003, U.S. patent application 10/367,024, filed Feb. 13, 2003, U.S. patent application 10/367,064, filed Feb. 13, 2003, U.S. patent application 10/367,404, filed Feb. 13, 2003, and U.S. patent application 10/367,062, filed Feb. 13, 2003, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
This invention was made with Government support under U.S. Government contract F33615-97-2-3407 awarded by the U.S. Air Force. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
This present invention relates to aircraft seats and, more specifically, to aircraft ejection seats.
At the U.S. Military's request, common-design aircraft are being developed for the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Marine Corps, and the U.S. Air Force. The Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force further modify the common-design aircraft.
One example of further modification of the common design is an ejection system for emergency escape from an aircraft. The Navy and Marine Corps traditionally favor ejecting from an aircraft as quickly as possible because of the hazards of carrier operations. The quickest ejection method is ejecting through the canopy. The U.S. Air Force prefers jettisoning the canopy prior to seat ejection. Because of these desires for two different ejection methods, two separate canopy systems are manufactured. This greatly increases costs over a common design aircraft that has not been modified.
Also, once a canopy system is installed in an aircraft, the ejection method is set. The customer can not easily alter the aircraft to allow for a different ejection method.
Therefore, there exists an unmet need to allow a customer to select and operate an ejection system in its preferred format without incurring great production or alteration costs.
The present invention provides a method and system for ejection operation in an aircraft. The present invention allows selection of one of two modes of ejection: ejecting through the canopy; and jettisoning the canopy before ejection.
The present invention provides a method and system for ejection operation in an aircraft. The system allows selection of one of two modes of ejection: ejecting through the canopy; and jettisoning the canopy before ejection. The system includes an ejection mode selector for selecting one of a canopy shattering ejection mode and a canopy jettison ejection mode, canopy shattering components, canopy jettison components, and an ejection actuator. The ejection actuator activates one of the canopy shattering components or the canopy jettison components based on the selected ejection mode.
In one aspect of the invention, the canopy shattering components include an explosive device within the canopy or a piercing device attached to an ejection seat.
In another aspect of the invention, the canopy jettison components include one or more force generating devices, such as explosive devices, located between the canopy and the aircraft.
In still another aspect of the invention, the ejection mode selector is located within a cockpit of the aircraft.
The preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings.
The present invention provides a method and system for ejection operation in an aircraft. The present invention allows selection of one of two modes of ejection: ejecting through the canopy; and jettisoning the canopy before ejection.
A non-limiting example of the ejection seat actuators 22 are ejection handles located above and below the ejection seat 32. The canopy shattering components 28 suitably include a mechanism for shattering the canopy, thereby allowing the ejection seat 32 to pass through the now-shattered canopy without causing harm to the occupant of the ejection seat 32. Non-limiting examples of canopy shattering mechanisms include explosive devices, such as a detonation cord, on the canopy or a puncturing device on the ejection seat 32.
The canopy jettison components 30 suitably include force generating devices, such as without limitation explosive charges or mechanical actuators, for forcing the canopy and supporting structures of the canopy into a wind stream 60.
The canopy shattering components 28 include, in one non-limiting example, a detonation cord 56 that is attached to the canopy 46. Referring now to
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiment. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10384788, | Apr 18 2016 | Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation; GOODRICH CORPORATION | Multiple aircraft seat ejection mode selector |
10837747, | Feb 15 2018 | GOODRICH CORPORATION | High explosive firing mechanism |
11345458, | Jul 24 2020 | AMI Industries, Inc.; AMI Industries, Inc | Deployable overhead protection assembly and methods of use for canopy fragilization system |
6845947, | Oct 09 2003 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy; NAVY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE | Aircraft canopy jettison apparatus with airbag |
7143979, | May 30 2003 | The Boeing Company | Vehicle windshield |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2258724, | |||
2511168, | |||
2699305, | |||
2829850, | |||
2853258, | |||
2970793, | |||
3618881, | |||
3670998, | |||
3729154, | |||
4004388, | Feb 21 1974 | PPG Industries, Inc. | Window panel edge construction |
4301707, | Oct 29 1979 | McDonnell Douglas Corporation | Embedded explosive severance of non-metallic materials |
451, | |||
4570879, | Mar 14 1983 | Avions Marcel Dassault-Breguet | Pyrotechnical process and device for bailing out of an aircraft |
4570880, | Apr 10 1982 | Dornier GmbH | Arrangement of devices to sever and remove canopy wall sections from aircraft cockpits |
4580745, | Apr 14 1983 | British Aerospace Public Limited Company | Aircraft cockpit canopy |
4721272, | Jan 23 1987 | SCOT, INCORPORATED, A CORP OF DE | Emergency remover device for ejecting aircraft canopies |
4982916, | Jun 07 1988 | Avions Marcel Dassault-Breguet Aviation | Ejector seat security device for aircraft |
5072896, | May 14 1990 | BF Goodrich Company | Powered canopy breakers |
5085383, | Apr 29 1988 | SHORT BROTHERS PLC, P O BOX 241, AIRPORT ROAD, BELFAST BT3 9DZ, NORTHERN IRELAND, UNITED KINGDOM | Canopy assembly |
5104067, | May 14 1990 | BF Goodrich Company | Detonating cord powered canopy breakers |
5289996, | Apr 07 1993 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air | Aircraft windshield system with frangible panel for aircrew emergency escape |
5301904, | Mar 17 1993 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | Canopy breaking device |
H451, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 31 2001 | WOOD, JEFFREY H | Boeing Company, the | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013788 | /0953 | |
Feb 13 2003 | The Boeing Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
May 19 2004 | The Boeing Company | United States Air Force | CONFIRMATORY LICENSE SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 015658 | /0551 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Dec 26 2007 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Dec 31 2007 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Sep 23 2011 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jan 29 2016 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jun 22 2016 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jun 22 2007 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Dec 22 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 22 2008 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jun 22 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jun 22 2011 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Dec 22 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 22 2012 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jun 22 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jun 22 2015 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Dec 22 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 22 2016 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jun 22 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |