A radiation detector (30) for a computed tomography scanner (12) includes a support structure (62). An alignment board (60) secures to the support structure (62) and includes photolithographically defined alignment openings (70) arranged to define a spatial focal point (34) relative to the alignment board (60). An anti-scatter element (32) is disposed on the support element (62) and includes one or more protrusions (86) which mate with the alignment openings (70) of the alignment board (60) to align the anti-scatter element (32) with the spatial focal point (34). A detector board (104) includes alignment structures (106) that align the detector board (104) with the anti-scatter element (32).
|
14. A method for manufacturing a radiation detector for a computed tomography scanner, the method comprising:
photolithographically defining alignment openings in an alignment board; aligning an anti-scatter element with the alignment board by mating one or more protrusions of the anti-scatter element with a selected one or more of the alignment openings of the alignment board; and aligning and mounting a detector board with the anti-scatter element, the detector board including a substrate and an array of radiation-sensitive elements arranged thereon.
7. A two dimensional radiation detector for a radiographic scanner, the radiation detector comprising:
a support structure; an alignment board secured to the support structure; and an anti-scatter module disposed on the support structure, the anti-scatter module including a plurality of anti-scatter vanes and spacer plates arranged between the anti-scatter vanes, the spacer plates defining a selected spacing and relative tilt between the anti-scatter vanes, the spacer plates each including protrusions which mate with alignment openings of the alignment board to align the anti-scatter module with a spatial focus.
23. A method for manufacturing a radiation detector for a computed tomography scanner, the method comprising:
photolithographically defining alignment openings in two alignment boards to produce two interchangeable alignment boards each having alignment openings; and aligning an anti-scatter element with the alignment boards by arranging the two interchangeable alignment boards parallel to one another with a selected gap therebetween, and mating protrusions on opposite sides of the anti-scatter element with alignment openings of the two parallel alignment boards to align the anti-scatter element in the selected gap between the alignment boards.
1. A two-dimensional radiation detector for a radiographic scanner, the radiation detector comprising:
a support structure; an alignment board secured to the support structure and including photolithographically defined alignment openings arranged to define a spatial focus relative to the alignment board; an anti-scatter module mounted on the support structure and including one or more protrusions which mate with alignment openings of the alignment board to align the anti-scatter module with the spatial focus; and a detector board including a substrate and an array of radiation-sensitive elements arranged on the substrate for detecting radiation produced by the radiographic scanner, the detector board further including alignment structures that align the detector board with the anti-scatter module.
24. A method for manufacturing a radiation detector for a computed tomography scanner, the method comprising:
applying a photoresist film to an alignment board; exposing and developing the photoresist film to define openings in the developed photoresist film that correspond to the alignment openings; etching the alignment board with the developed photoresist to define the alignment openings; removing the developed photoresist; aligning an anti-scatter element with the alignment board by mating one or more protrusions of the anti-scatter element with a selected one or more of the alignment openings of the alignment board; and aligning and mounting a detector board with the anti-scatter element, the detector board including a substrate and an array of radiation-sensitive elements arranged thereon.
9. A two-dimensional radiation detector for a radiographic scanner, the radiation detector comprising:
two substantially planar alignment boards arranged parallel to one another; two support plates, each support plate supporting one of the two substantially planar alignment boards with the two substantially planar alignment boards arranged between the support plates; an anti-scatter module arranged between the two substantially planar alignment boards and including one or more protrusion arranged on opposite sides of the anti-scatter module which mate with alignment openings of the two substantially planar alignment boards to align the anti-scatter module with a spatial focus; and a detector board including a substrate and an array of radiation-sensitive elements arranged on the substrate for detecting radiation produced by the radiographic scanner, the detector board further including alignment structures that align the detector board with the anti-scatter module.
26. A radiographic scanner comprising:
a support frame; a radiation source mounted to the support frame which emits a diverging radiation beam from a focal region; first and second interchangeable generally symmetrical, substantially planar alignment boards arranged parallel to one another with a selected gap therebetween and secured to the support frame, each alignment board including an array of alignment openings formed therein; a plurality of anti-scatter modules each including a plurality of parallel radiation-absorbing plates, the anti-scatter module arranged between the alignment boards and aligned with respect to the radiation focal region by protrusions on opposite sides of the anti-scatter modules that mate with the alignment openings of the first and the second alignment boards; and a plurality of detector boards that mount to and align with the anti-scatter modules after the anti-scatter modules are mounted between the alignment boards and aligned with the focal spot regions.
2. The radiation detector as set forth in
a scintillator that produces scintillation events responsive to impingement of radiation produced by the radiographic scanner on the scintillator; and an array of photodetectors arranged to view the scintillator and detect the scintillation events.
3. The radiation detector as set forth in
a plurality of anti-scatter vanes, each including one or more protrusions which mate with alignment openings of the alignment board.
4. The radiation detector as set forth in
5. The radiation detector as set forth in
6. The radiation detector as set forth in
a computed tomography scanner including an x-ray source that rotates about an examination region and emits an x-ray beam that traverses the examination region and strikes the radiation detector, the radiation detector being arranged with the spatial focus substantially coinciding with the x-ray source to detect the x-rays after traversing the examination region.
8. The radiation detector as set forth in
adhesive arranged between each anti-scatter vane and adjacent spacer plates to secure the spacer plates to the anti-scatter vane.
10. The radiation detector as set forth in
a plurality of anti-scatter vanes formed of a material which is substantially absorbing for radiation produced by the radiographic scanner; and two end caps disposed on opposite sides of the anti-scatter vanes and retaining the anti-scatter vanes, each end cap including one or more protrusions which mate with alignment openings of the two substantially planar alignment boards.
11. The radiation detector as set forth in
a plurality of spacer plates arranged between the anti-scatter vanes and parallel thereto that define a selected spacing between the anti-scatter vanes, the spacer plates being formed of a material which is substantially radiation-translucent to radiation.
12. The radiation detector as set forth in
13. The radiation detector as set forth in
15. The method as set forth in
16. The method as set forth in
photolithographically defining an edge of the alignment board.
17. The method as set forth in
aligning a plurality of anti-scatter elements on the alignment board with each anti-scatter element aligned to selectively pass radiation originating at the spatial focal point.
18. The method as set forth in
mounting the radiation detector onto the computed tomography scanner, including aligning the spatial focal point defined by the alignment openings with the x-ray source.
19. The method as set forth in
repeating the steps of aligning an anti-scatter element and aligning and mounting a detector board for a plurality of anti-scatter elements and detector boards.
20. The method as set forth in
mating an alignment structure of the detector board with a corresponding alignment structure of the anti-scatter element.
21. The method as set forth in
arranging the radiation-sensitive elements between adjacent radiation-absorbing plates.
22. The method as set forth in
securing the alignment board to a support structure, the securing including aligning the alignment board with the support structure using selected alignment openings of the alignment board.
25. The method as set forth in
27. The radiographic scanner as set forth in
first a second caps that connect with opposite sides of the radiation-absorbing plates, the first cap including protrusions that mate with alignment openings of the first alignment board and the second cap including protrusions that mate with alignment openings of the second alignment board to align the anti-scatter plates with respect to the radiation focal region.
28. The radiographic scanner as set forth in
residue contamination on at least one surface left over from a photolithographic processing of the alignment boards.
29. The radiographic scanner as set forth in
a plurality of alignment opening groups, each alignment opening group defining a line aligned with an x-ray ray path.
30. The radiographic scanner as set forth in
a plurality of alignment opening groups, each alignment opening group defining a radial line, the radial lines of the plurality of alignment opening groups converging at the radiation focal region.
|
The present invention relates to the diagnostic imaging arts. It particularly relates to computed tomography imaging employing an x-ray source and a two-dimensional detector array that enables rapid acquisition of volumetric x-ray absorption imaging data, and will be described with particular reference thereto. However, the invention will also find application in other types of radiation detectors for a variety of imaging applications employing x-rays, visible light, radiation from an administered radiopharmaceutical, or other types of radiation. The invention will further find application in non-imaging radiation detectors.
Computed tomography (CT) imaging typically employs an x-ray source that generates a fan-beam, wedge-beam, or cone-beam of x-rays that traverse an examination region. A subject arranged in the examination region interacts with and absorbs a portion of the traversing x-rays. A one- or two-dimensional radiation detector including an array of detector elements is arranged opposite the x-ray source to detect and measure intensities of the transmitted x-rays.
Typically, the x-ray source and the radiation detector are mounted at opposite sides of a rotating gantry such that the gantry is rotated to obtain an angular range of projection views of the subject. In some configurations the x-ray source is mounted on the rotating gantry while the radiation detector is mounted on a stationary gantry. In either configuration, the projection views are reconstructed using filtered backprojection or another reconstruction method to produce a three-dimensional image representation of the subject or of a selected portion thereof. Typically, the reconstruction assumes that the radiation traversed a linear path from the x-ray source directly to the detector. Any scattered radiation that reaches the detector degrades the resultant image.
The detector array of the radiation detector typically includes a scintillator crystal array which produces bursts of light, called scintillation events, in response to x-rays. A two-dimensional array of photodetectors such as a monolithic silicon photodiode array are arranged to view the scintillator and produce analog electrical signals indicative of the spatial location and intensity of the scintillation event. The intensity is typically translatable into an energy of the x-ray photon that produced the scintillation event, and hence provides spectral information.
Typically, the detector array is a focus-centered array including a curved detection surface defining a focus that coincides with a focus of the x-ray beam which is typically at or near the x-ray source. Preferably, anti-scatter elements such as arrays of anti-scatter plates are mounted in front of the scintillator, and are precisely aligned with the x-ray paths to block scattered x-rays which would otherwise contribute to measurement noise. The spacing between the anti-scattering plates defines slits through which the direct or non-scattered x-rays pass unimpeded. However, scattered x-rays are angularly deviated due to the scattering and strike the anti-scatter plates which absorb the scattered x-rays.
The anti-scatter plates are preferably thin to minimize absorption of direct x-rays, and tall in the direction of the x-ray source to maximize absorption of scattered x-rays having small deviation angles. The degree of scatter rejection is improved by using plates constructed from a metal or other material with a high atomic number and by making the plates tall in the direction pointing toward the focal spot of the focus-centered detector array. In present anti-scatter elements, plates with heights of between one centimeter and four centimeters are typical.
These large anti-scatter plate heights require precise alignment of the anti-scatter elements with the spatial focal point of the detector array, and similarly precise alignment of the x-ray source at the spatial focal point. Misalignment of the anti-scatter plates can produce shadowing of the detectors by the anti-scatter plates. Shadowing, in turn, leads to reduced x-ray intensities and image artifacts which generally manifest as rings in the image reconstruction. Spatially non-uniform shadowing also leads to spectral differences in the detected x-rays and non-linear detector array characteristics. Furthermore, if the anti-scatter plates are inadequately secured, mechanical vibrations can produce temporally varying shadowing due to mechanical flexing of the tall, thin anti-scatter plates during gantry rotation which leads to a variety of image artifacts.
A conventional detector array is assembled starting with the radiation detectors, which are commonly monolithic photodiode arrays. The photodiode arrays are mounted to ceramic support substrates for rigidity, and scintillator crystals are bonded to the monolithic photodiode arrays to form detector boards. Anti-scatter elements are next mounted and aligned with the photodiodes on the detector boards. The detector boards with joined anti-scatter elements are mounted onto a mechanical base plate and manually aligned with a spatial focal spot corresponding to a convergence point of the x-ray beam. Mounting brackets for mounting the radiation detector onto the computed tomography imaging scanner are also connected to the base plate. Finally, the radiation detector is mounted onto the computed tomography scanner.
A common problem in such detector arrays is cumulative alignment stack-up errors. Accumulation of errors in alignment of the photodiode arrays, the scintillators, and the anti-scatter elements, followed by further alignment errors introduced in mounting the detector boards onto the mechanical base plate, can lead to substantial cumulative misalignment of the anti-scatter plates relative to the x-ray beam. Usually, shims, spacers, or other mechanical adjustments are provided for precisely adjusting the alignment of the anti-scatter plates of the constructed and mounted radiation detector to correct the misalignment. These mechanical adjustments are time-consuming, and the alignment accuracy of the final array is dependent upon the skill of the individual performing the anti-scatter plate adjustments.
The present invention contemplates an improved apparatus and method that overcomes the aforementioned limitations and others.
According to one aspect of the invention, a two-dimensional radiation detector is disclosed for a radiographic scanner. A support structure is provided. An alignment board secures to the support structure and includes alignment openings arranged to define a spatial focus relative to the alignment board. An anti-scatter module is disposed on the support element and includes one or more protrusions which mate with the alignment openings of the alignment board to align the anti-scatter module with the spatial focus. A detector board is provided, including a substrate and an array of radiation-sensitive elements arranged on the substrate for detecting radiation produced by the radiographic scanner. The detector board further includes alignment structures that align the detector board with the anti-scatter module.
According to another aspect of the invention, a method is provided for manufacturing a radiation detector for a computed tomography scanner. Alignment openings are defined in an alignment board. An anti-scatter element is aligned with the alignment board by mating one or more protrusions of the anti-scatter element with a selected one or more of the alignment openings of the alignment board. A detector board is aligned and mounted with the anti-scatter element. The detector board includes a substrate and an array of radiation-sensitive elements arranged thereon.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, a radiographic scanner is disclosed. A radiation source is mounted to a support frame. The radiation source emits a diverging radiation beam from a focal region. First and second generally symmetrical, substantially planar alignment boards are arranged parallel to one another and secured to the support frame. Each alignment board includes an array of alignment openings formed therein. A plurality of anti-scatter plates are arranged between the alignment boards and aligned with respect to the radiation focal region by couplings to alignment openings of both the first and the second alignment boards. A plurality of detector boards align with the anti-scatter plates.
One advantage of the present invention resides in a substantial reduction in stack-up errors in the alignment of the anti-scatter elements.
Another advantage of the present invention resides in improved accuracy in alignment of anti-scatter plates or elements.
Another advantage of the present invention resides in an improved method for manufacturing highly precise and accurate alignment plates for radiation detectors which is readily scaled to higher densities of alignment openings of various shapes and sizes.
Yet another advantage of the present invention resides in a simplified process for assembling a detector array for computed tomography imaging.
Numerous additional advantages and benefits of the present invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment.
The invention may take form in various components and arrangements of components, and in various steps and arrangements of steps. The drawings are only for the purpose of illustrating preferred embodiments and are not to be construed as limiting the invention.
With reference to
In an exemplary helical imaging mode, the rotating gantry 22 rotates simultaneously with linear advancement of the subject support 20 to produce a generally helical trajectory of the x-ray source 14 and collimator 16 about the examination region 18. However, other imaging modes can also be employed, such as a single- or multi-slice imaging mode in which the gantry 22 rotates as the subject support 20 remains stationary to produce a generally circular trajectory of the x-ray source 14 over which an axial image is acquired. After the axial image is acquired, the subject support optionally steps a pre-determined distance in the Z-direction and the axial image acquisition is repeated to acquire volumetric data in discrete steps along the Z-direction.
A radiation detector 30 is arranged on the gantry 22 across from the x-ray source 14. In the exemplary CT scanner 12, the radiation detector 30 spans a selected angular range that preferably comports with a fan angle of the x-ray beam. The radiation detector 30 includes several rows of detectors along the Z-direction for acquiring imaging data along a portion of the Z-direction in each projection view. The radiation detector 30 is arranged on the gantry 22 opposite to the x-ray source 14 and rotates therewith so that the radiation detector 30 receives x-rays that traverse the examination region 14 as the gantry 22 rotates.
A plurality of anti-scatter elements 32, such as spaced anti-scatter plates, are arranged on the radiation detector 30 and are oriented with respect to a spatial focal point 34 generally corresponding to an origin or convergence point of the x-ray beam. The spatial focal point 34 is typically on the anode of the x-ray source 14. The detector 30 is a focus-centered detector centered on the spatial focal point 34.
Instead of the arrangement shown in
With continuing reference to
A reconstruction processor 42 reconstructs the acquired projection data, using filtered backprojection, an n-PI reconstruction method, or other reconstruction method, to generate a three-dimensional image representation of the subject or of a selected portion thereof which is stored in an image memory 44. The image representation is rendered or otherwise manipulated by a video processor 46 to produce a human-viewable image that is displayed on a graphical user interface (GUI) 48 or another display device, printing device, or the like for viewing by an operator.
Preferably, the GUI 48 is additionally programmed to interface a human operator with the CT scanner 12 to allow the operator to initialize, execute, and control CT imaging sessions. The GUI 48 is optionally interfaced with a communication network such as a hospital or clinic information network via which image reconstructions are transmitted to medical personnel, a patient information database is accessed, or the like.
With continuing reference to FIG. 1 and with further reference to
With continuing reference to FIG. 2 and with further reference to
In the embodiment of the alignment plate 60 shown in
With continuing reference to
Although the anti-scatter plates or vanes 80 are generally parallel to one another, those skilled in the art will recognize that precisely parallel plates do not exactly align with the spatial focal point 34. That is, precisely parallel planes do not contain any points in common, and hence cannot contain the spatial focal point 34 in common. Preferably, the generally parallel anti-scatter plates or vanes 80 are each aligned with a plane that intersects the spatial focal point 34. Such planes are close to, but not exactly, parallel over a length L of the anti-scatter plate 80 since L is short compared a distance between the anti-scatter module 32 and the spatial focal point 34.
In a preferred embodiment for obtaining the preferred generally parallel arrangement of anti-scatter plates 80 in the module 32, the sides of the spacer plates 82 that contact the anti-scatter plates 80 are preferably slightly non-parallel. An angle of the non-parallel sides is selected to provide a slight tilt of the contacting anti-scatter plates 80 relative to one another to closely align each anti-scatter plate 80 with a plane that intersects the spatial focal point 34.
The anti-scatter plates or vanes 80 are preferably formed of a material with a high atomic number that is highly absorbing for radiation produced by the x-ray source 14, such as tantalum, tungsten, lead, or the like. The spacer plates 82 are formed of a material that is substantially translucent to radiation produced by the x-ray source 14, and are suitably formed of a plastic material. In a preferred embodiment, the spacer plates 82 are substantially hollow molded plastic frames, rather than full molded plastic slabs, to further reduce radiation absorption in the spacer plates 82.
The arrangement of generally parallel anti-scatter plates 80 and spacer plates 82 is secured at the sides by two end caps 841, 842. Each end cap 84 includes alignment pins or other alignment protrusions 86 that are aligned along the radial line or plane 72, as best seen in FIG. 5A. In a preferred embodiment, the protrusions 86 of one end cap 842, align with the protrusions 86 of the other end cap 842, as best seen in
With continuing reference to
In the preferred illustrated embodiment the two alignment plates 601, 602 cooperate in aligning the anti-scatter modules 32. However, it is also contemplated to employ only a single alignment plate 60.
With reference to
With continuing reference to FIG. 9 and with further reference to
The alignment of the photodetector array module 104 to the anti-scatter module 32 arranges the detector elements 114 in the gaps between the anti-scatter plates 80 as shown in FIG. 10. The detector elements 114 view between the anti-scatter plates 80, i.e. view through the spacer plates 82 such that scattered radiation which angularly deviates from the unscattered radiation is substantially absorbed by the anti-scatter plates 80 and does not reach the detector elements 114.
With continuing reference to
In a step 124, the anti-scatter elements or modules 32 are aligned with the anti-scatter alignment openings 70 by coupling the alignment projections 86 with the anti-scatter alignment openings 70 of the alignment plates 601, 602, and the anti-scatter modules 32 are secured to the support elements 621, 622 using the fasteners 100. In a step 126, each photodetector array module 104 is aligned to each corresponding anti-scatter module 32 using the mating alignment pins 102 and openings 106, and the photodetector array module 104 is secured to the anti-scatter module 32, the support elements 62, or another suitable support.
It will be appreciated that if the photodetector array modules 104 are secured to corresponding anti-scatter modules 32, then the alignment steps 124, 126 are optionally reversed. That is, the step 126 of aligning the photodetector array modules 104 to the anti-scatter modules 32 can be performed first, with each photodetector array module 104 aligned and secured to a corresponding anti-scatter module 32, followed by alignment of the anti-scatter modules 32 with attached photodetector array modules 104 to the alignment plates 60 in the step 124.
In a step 128, the assembled radiation detector 30 is aligned and mounted to the computed tomography scanner gantry 22. The aligned anti-scatter modules 32 of the radiation detector 30 cooperatively define a spatial focal spot 34, as best seen in
The assembly method 120 described with particular reference to
The alignment openings 70, 76 are precisely and accurately positioned. Furthermore, for manufacturing purposes, the alignment plates 601, 602 are preferably mass-produced with close tolerances in the positioning and sizing of the alignment openings 70, 76. In a preferred embodiment, the alignment plates 601, 602 are interchangeable, so that a single part is mass-produced for manufacturing quantities of the radiation detector 30.
With reference to
In one suitable embodiment, the stock metal plate 152 is cut mechanically to define the shape of the alignment plate 60. In a preferred embodiment, however, the mechanical cutting of the stock metal plate is limited to defining a rectangular or other regular shape whose dimensions exceed the outer dimensions of the desired alignment plate 60. In this latter embodiment, the photolithographic method 150 described below precisely defines the outer dimensions of the alignment plate simultaneously with formation of the openings 70, 74, 76.
A selected photoresist film is applied to both sides of the metal plate 152. The photoresist is preferably applied using evaporation, a spin-on photoresist application method, or other method that produces a uniform and well-controlled thickness of photoresist on both sides of the stock metal plate 152.
The photoresist film is exposed to a selected light using a pattern mask in a step 156. As is known in the art, photoresist is a light-sensitive substance whose resistance to certain types of etching chemicals is altered by exposure to light. With positive photoresists, exposure to light weakens resistance to the chemical etching. With negative photoresists, exposure to light strengthens resistance to the chemical etching.
Interposing the pattern mask between the light and the photoresist film during the exposure step 156 causes selective exposure of the photoresist film. For a positive photoresist, the pattern mask blocks exposure except in the areas to be etched, i.e. the openings 70, 74, 76. For a negative photoresist, the mask blocks exposure only in the areas to be etched, i.e. the openings 70, 74, 76.
The pattern mask is preferably constructed from a computer-assisted drawing (CAD) design using known methods. The pattern mask can also be generated by photographic replication and optional reduction or enlargement of a precise and accurate manual drawing of the target light exposure pattern.
The exposed photoresist is developed in a step 158. The developing step 158 includes optional annealing or other curing of the exposed photoresist to optimize etching characteristics of the light-exposed and unexposed regions, followed by chemical etching in a developer chemical that selectively removes the light-exposed regions of the photoresist film (for positive photoresist) or the regions of the photoresist film which were not exposed to light (for negative photoresist). The developing step 158 causes the photoresist to be patterned such that those areas of the metal plate 152 which are to be removed, i.e. the openings 70, 74, 76, are not covered by photoresist, while the remainder of the metal plate 152 remains covered.
The metal plate 150 with the patterned photoresist is etched in a step 160 using an etchant that etches the metal plate 150 but leaves the developed photoresist substantially unaffected. Hence, the exposed regions of the patterned photoresist corresponding to the openings 70, 74, 76 are etched, while the photoresist-coated remainder of the metal plate 150 is left substantially unaffected.
For the preferred embodiment in which the photolithography process 150 defines the outer dimensions of the desired alignment plate 60, the photoresist pattern preferably additionally includes a continuous contour exposed region through which the etchant can cut out the alignment plate 60 in a precise and accurate fashion. Similarly, the through-holes 74 for the fasteners 100 or other features of the alignment plate 60 are suitably incorporated into the photoresist pattern and hence formed in the metal plate 150 during the etching step 160.
After the etching step 160, the developed photoresist 162 is removed in a step 162. Typically a solvent such as acetone or the like suitably removes the developed photoresist while leaving the metal substantially unaffected. It will be appreciated that a small amount of residual photoresist contamination will typically remain after the cleaning step 162. Since small amounts of residual contamination do not affect the functional use of the alignment plate 60, the photoresist removal step 162 preferably uses a solvent exposure which leaves small amounts of residue contamination remaining on one or more surfaces of the alignment plate 60. Such residual contamination can be detected, for example, using sensitive chemical surface analysis techniques such as Auger electron spectroscopy, x-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS), or the like.
The photoresist application, exposure, developing, metal etching, and photoresist removal steps 154, 156, 158, 160, 162 are well-known in the photolithographic arts, and the skilled artisan can select an appropriate photoresist, metal etchant, and photoresist solvent, and corresponding appropriate photolithographic parameters such the photoresist thickness, exposure time, etching time, and the like to optimize the method 150 for selected types of stock metal plates, for available photolithography facilities, and so forth.
In one suitable embodiment, although the photoresist is applied to both sides of the metal plate 152 in the step 154, the pattern-defining step 156 is applied to only one side of the metal plate 152. In this case the developed photoresist has openings only on the exposed side, and the etching step 160 etches the openings 72, 74, 76 from the exposed side.
In another suitable embodiment, the pattern-defining step 156 is applied to both sides of the metal plate 152 so that the etching step 160 etches the openings 72, 74, 76 simultaneously from both sides of the metal plate 152. This embodiment beneficially reduces the etching time by about a factor of two. However, precise relative alignment of the exposed patterns on the two sides should be achieved using known pattern mask alignment techniques, so that during the etching step 160 the simultaneously etched openings from the two opposite sides line up and properly join.
In actually constructed embodiments, the alignment plate 60 has an accuracy in hole placement that is better than 0.0025 cm across a 100 cm area. However, undercutting or other imperfections introduced during the etching step 160 may produce openings 72, 76 which are not optimally defined with respect to circularity and diameter. To improve circularity and diameter accuracy of the openings 72, 76, the openings 72, 76 are optionally mechanically reamed in a step 164 to more precisely define the shape and size of the openings. The starting stock metal plate has been found to have an optimal thickness of about 0.025 centimeters for stainless steel. Thicker plates result in reduced hole diameter accuracy, while thinner plates result in reduced mechanical strength of the alignment plate 60.
In addition to high precision and accuracy in the placement of alignment openings, those skilled in the art will recognize substantial additional advantages in using photolithography to define the alignment openings and other structures of the alignment plates 60. One particular advantage is that the manufacturing cost of the alignment plate is generally independent of the number of alignment openings formed therein. Hence, the conventional arrangement of a restricted number of anti-scatter modules which each include a plurality of anti-scatter plates is not necessary. Rather, the anti-scatter plates 80 and spacer plates 82 can be directly installed without the module-defining end caps 84.
With reference to
With reference to
In the various anti-scatter elements 32, 32', 32', it is to be appreciated that the alignment protrusions, nubs, pins, or extensions 86, 86', 86" can be cylindrical extensions, slots, or the like. The extensions 86', 86" can be correspond to extensions of the spacer plate 82' or the anti-scatter plate 80", respectively, to a length greater than the separation of the alignment plates 60', 60", such that the extensions 86', 86" are planar tabs substantially spanning a length of a side of the spacer plate 82' or the anti-scatter plate 80". In this arrangement the alignment openings of the alignment plates 60', 60" corresponding to each spacer plate 82' or anti-scatter plate 80" are single long slots each receiving a planar tab.
Although the radiation detector 30 has been described with reference to a computed tomography imaging scanner, it is readily modified for use in other imaging systems. For example, a gamma camera for nuclear medical imaging typically includes detector arrays substantially similar to the detector array 110 with scintillators suitable for converting radiation produced by an administered radiopharmaceutical to light detectable by the detector array. Gamma cameras further typically include radiation collimators that define radial directions or narrow viewing cones corresponding to each detector element. Those skilled in the art can readily adapt the alignment plates 60, 60', 60" to precisely and accurately align collimators on a gamma camera. In such an adaptation, since the collimators of a gamma camera preferably define precisely parallel projections, the spatial focal point 34 described herein is suitably located at mathematical infinity, corresponding to precisely parallel radial lines 72. Analogously, these techniques can be applied to conventional x-ray, digital x-ray, fluoroscopy, and the like.
The invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the invention be construed as including all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
Brunnett, William C., Mattson, Rodney A., Luhta, Randall P.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10646176, | Sep 30 2015 | General Electric Company | Layered radiation detector |
7283605, | Jan 14 2006 | General Electric Company | Methods and apparatus for scatter correction |
7375338, | Mar 07 2007 | General Electric Company | Swappable collimators method and system |
7382043, | Sep 25 2002 | Data Device Corporation | Method and apparatus for shielding an integrated circuit from radiation |
7564940, | Jul 22 2003 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Radiation mask for two dimensional CT detector |
7573035, | Oct 29 2004 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | GOS ceramic scintillating fiber optics x-ray imaging plate for use in medical DF and RF imaging and in CT |
7769128, | Dec 19 2002 | General Electric Company | Support structure for z-extensible CT detectors and methods of making same |
7869573, | Dec 27 2007 | MORPHO DETECTION, LLC | Collimator and method for fabricating the same |
8018739, | Jul 16 2003 | Data Device Corporation | Apparatus for shielding integrated circuit devices |
8525119, | May 20 2009 | Koninklijke Philips N. V. | Detector array with pre-focused anti-scatter grid |
9076563, | Jun 03 2013 | SUZHOU BOWING MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CO , LTD | Anti-scatter collimators for detector systems of multi-slice X-ray computed tomography systems |
9078569, | Aug 20 2012 | SUZHOU BOWING MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CO , LTD | Configurable data measurement and acquisition systems for multi-slice X-ray computed tomography systems |
9285327, | Feb 06 2013 | SUZHOU BOWING MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES CO , LTD | Adjustable photon detection systems for multi-slice X-ray computed tomography systems |
9949702, | Feb 21 2014 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | X-ray grid structure and X-ray apparatus including the same |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4338521, | May 09 1980 | GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, A CORP OF NY | Modular radiation detector array and module |
4429227, | Dec 28 1981 | General Electric Company | Solid state detector for CT comprising improvements in collimator plates |
4607164, | Jul 28 1982 | Hitachi, Ltd.; Hitachi Medical Corporation | Radiation detecting apparatus |
5293417, | Dec 06 1991 | General Electric Company | X-ray collimator |
5357553, | Feb 28 1994 | Radiographic grid | |
5487098, | Feb 03 1994 | Analogic Corporation | Modular detector arrangement for X-ray tomographic system |
6055296, | Sep 20 1996 | Radiographic grid with reduced lamellae density artifacts | |
6134301, | Dec 26 1996 | General Electric Company | Collimator and detector for computed tomography systems |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Sep 17 2002 | LUHTA, RANDALL P | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013325 | /0762 | |
Sep 17 2002 | MATTSON, RODNEY A | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013325 | /0762 | |
Sep 18 2002 | BRUNNETT, WILLIAM C | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013325 | /0762 | |
Sep 20 2002 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 30 2008 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 22 2011 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Feb 10 2016 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 17 2007 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Feb 17 2008 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 17 2008 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 17 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 17 2011 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Feb 17 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 17 2012 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 17 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 17 2015 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Feb 17 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 17 2016 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 17 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |