A CMOS Active pixel image sensor is formed by only two transistors. The sensor may be fabricated with very small pixel sizes, which have only two metal contacts in them, have in-pixel offset non-uniformity correction, and bootstrapped reset lines. These features are achieved by employing the transistor body effect as the main photo-generated charge sensing means. The bootstrapped reset lines allow the sensor to operate at low bias voltages. Additional embodiments of the invention include: single line for addressing the pixels, column-clamping circuits to prevent the forward biasing of pixel's p-n junctions and trench isolation to minimize the pixel size.
|
1. An Active pixel CMOS image sensor device including at least one pixel circuit, comprising:
at least one transistor of a first conductivity type; and
at least one transistor of a second conductivity type, said transistor of the second conductivity type being used for resetting the body of the transistor of the first conductivity type.
2. The Active pixel CMOS image sensor according to
3. The device according to
4. The device according to
5. The device according to
6. The device according to
|
The present invention relates to solid-state image sensors and specifically to Active Pixel CMOS image sensors that have only two transistors in each pixel.
State of the art CMOS image sensors have typically three or more transistors per pixel and are addressed and reset with two or more row lines. The pixels are also supplied with a power supply line and the output is obtained through a column sense line.
A typical circuit schematic diagram 101 of a standard CMOS pixel is shown in FIG. 1. As light impinges on the pixel photodiode 102, the diode is discharged and the resulting voltage of node 111 is supplied to the gate of the sensing transistor 103. When a particular row “Yn” is ready to be addressed, the addressing signal is applied to line 108, which turns the transistor 104 on. This connects the signal appearing on the source of the transistor 103 through the interconnect 107 to column line 112. The current source load 113 loads the column sense line “Xm”. After the sensing is completed, the reset line 109 is pulsed, which resets the node 111 through the reset transistor 105 to the original level.
The whole cycle of sensing and resetting is periodically repeated when the sensor is used in a movie mode or is terminated just after one cycle when the sensor is used in a still picture mode. The drain of the reset transistor 105 is connected together with the drain of the sense transistor 103, and further through the interconnect 106 to the Vdd bus line 110. Separate lines for the reset and Vdd are also possible. The voltage waveform that appears on the node 111 is shown in the graph 201 in FIG. 2. When the reset pulse 204 is applied to the pixel, the node voltage is reset to level 205 that corresponds to dark signal. The light impinging on the photodiode 102 gradually discharges the node causing the node voltage to follow an approximately linear line 202 assuming that the light intensity is constant. When an address pulse 203 is applied to the pixel, the source voltage is sensed and delivered to column processing circuits. The new reset pulse 204 then restores the pixel original dark level 205. More information about Active Pixel Image (APS) Sensor design and operation can be found in the paper: “CMOS Image Sensor: Electronic Camera On a Chip” Eric Fossum published in the IEDM Technical Digest 1995 pp. 17-25. Additional information is also available in the U.S. Pat. No. 5,471,575 to Fossum at al.
APS image sensors have advantages in low power consumption, high speed, require only low bias voltages, and can be produced with low cost. However, the complexity of the pixel design leads to a sacrifice of some light collecting area, which ultimately results in lower QE. Another disadvantage is in pixel-offset non-uniformities that are caused by the threshold variations of pixel transistors. The resulting pixel signal has to be processed to remove these non-uniformities. Pixels in each column can share the column processing circuitry, however, these circuits typically require at least two large capacitors for the offset subtraction and data storage, which may consume a significant portion of the chip area. Another problem resulting from the complex pixel circuitry is the need for several contacts between the transistor gates, source and drain regions, and metal busing. The pixel circuit 101, shown in
It is the purpose of this invention to teach how to overcome the above-described limitations and how to achieve, small pixel size, fewer transistors per pixel, and fewer in-pixel contacts, and to teach how to compensate pixel offset non-uniformities by storing the corrective signal in the pixel itself. The prior art does not show how to design an Active Pixel CMOS image sensor with a small pixel size that has only two transistors per pixel and only two in-pixel contacts. The prior art does not teach how to compensate for pixel offset non-uniformities by storing the error-compensating signal in the pixel itself. Finally the prior art does not teach how to improve the image sensor performance at low biasing voltages by bootstrapping the reset gate signal.
The present invention provides an Active Pixel CMOS image sensor that has only two transistors in each pixel, in-pixel offset non-uniformity correction, and bootstrapped reset lines. The reduced number of active pixel elements leads to higher Quantum Efficiency (QE) and smaller pixel size. The unique pixel row addressing and reset technique that uses only a single line further improves the sensor's QE. Separate column lines for the pixel output and reset reference allow for efficient compensation of pixel-offset non-uniformities. The pixel-offset non-uniformities are individually detected after each photo-generated signal has been read out. Special array column or array external processing circuits compute the corresponding pixel non-uniformity error-compensating signal and supply it back through the reset line to each pixel. As a result the photo-generated signal is always referenced to an absolute reference level free of any pixel-offset error. This type of non-uniformity correction thus reduces the number of column capacitors, normally needed for the standard non-uniformity correction and data storage, since the offset compensation is stored in the pixel itself. This technique significantly reduces the chip size and eventually the cost of the sensor.
These and other objects are achieved by using the body effect of p-type transistor as the main photo-signal sensing means. The n-well region containing the p-type transistor is reset to a reference voltage by a second n-type pixel transistor and then left floating. Impinging light creates electron-hole pairs and collected electrons are changing potential of the n-well. The potential changes modulate the threshold of the p-type transistor and these changes then represent the pixel output signal. The reset reference for each pixel is adjustable individually to compensate for the intrinsic p-type transistor threshold variations. This feature, when activated, effectively cancels the pixel-offset non-uniformities.
Another embodiment of the invention includes incorporation of trench isolation into each pixel. The trench isolation allows reducing the transient regions between the p-type and the n-type doping regions within the pixel and between the pixels of the array. This in turn leads to reduction of pixel size.
Yet additional embodiment of the invention includes the stacked double poly reset line that generates bootstrapped reset signal for the n-well reset transistor. This allows resetting the n-well to a higher voltage level, which increases the pixel output voltage swing and thus the overall sensor Dynamic Range. This feature is important when low bias voltages are required to operate the sensor.
The main advantage of the above-described pixel structure is that it contains only two transistors and consequently requires only two contacts to the array bus lines. The n-type transistor resets the n-well without the need for in-pixel metal interconnects and thus the pixel does not need additional contacts. This leads to an aggressive pixel size reduction without any significant sacrifice in the sensor sensitivity and QE.
The invention will be described in detail in the following description of preferred embodiments with reference to the following figures wherein:
Simplified circuit diagrams 301 and 312 for two versions of the CMOS pixel of the invention are shown in
The n-well potential change is affecting the threshold voltage of transistor 302 through the body effect phenomenon and the potential of transistor 302 source is changed accordingly starting from the reset level 407 along the line 403 as indicated by the dotted curve if it were turned on. However, the transistor is turned off, since its gate is not addressed when biased to an intermediate Vm level 404. When address pulse 406 is applied, the transistor turns on and the potential level 409 is supplied to the column sense line as the pixel output.
An example of one possible pixel layout 501 is shown in
Region 502 indicates the n-well. The P-type substrate or p-well is the region 503, which is everything outside the n-well 502. Region 507 defines a p-type transistor with its drain overlapping the n-well 502 to facilitate the drain to substrate connection as explained previously. Similarly, region 508 defines a n-type transistor with its source overlapping the n-well 502 to make the required connection. Metal bus lines 504, for reset, and 505, for signal, are slightly offset, but this is only for the purpose of drawing clarity. In practice they may be located on top of each other and elsewhere in the pixel. Transistor contacts to corresponding bus lines are indicated in the drawing by dots 509 and 510.
For more clarity a pixel cross section 601 is shown in
Another example of possible pixel layout is shown in
When CMOS image sensors are required to operate at low bias voltages, the threshold voltage of the reset transistor reduces the voltage swing of node 111 (
A simplified schematic diagram 701, shown in
For completeness a simplified block diagram 801 of a CMOS image sensor that includes the pixels of the invention is given in FIG. 8.
The horizontal switches are consecutively turned on and off by the command signals received from the horizontal scan decoder 821 via the lines 823. Sometimes it is advantageous to replace the horizontal scan decoder by a shift register. The input into the horizontal scanner is received through bus lines 824. The sequential pixel output appears on the horizontal sense line 818 and is amplified and buffered by the output amplifier 819 that drives the chip output terminal 822. The array vertical scanning is accomplished by decoder 810, which supplies the necessary control signals to line drivers 809 and finally through them to pixel address lines 807. The vertical scanner receives its input through bus 811. An important element of the array peripheral circuits is the column-clamping switch 814. The primary function of the switch is to keep the column signal lines from drifting to a high bias level, and start forward biasing the pixel's p-n junctions when there is no pixel addressed. A suitable clamping bias is supplied to all the switches via line 813, and the switches are controlled by a command signal supplied via line 812.
A simplified timing diagram 901 that includes some of the array's essential control signals is shown in FIG. 9. The pixel addressing pulse 904 connects the pixel output form one row of pixels to the corresponding column sense lines. Prior to this moment, sense lines were clamped to the level 907. The column sense lines always remain clamped to this level when no addressing pulses are applied. Addressing pulses cause the column sense lines to change their potential to a new level 908. The level 908 is subsequently sampled by pulses 916 and stored on holding capacitors 820 (
Another embodiment of the column signal processing circuitry 1001 is shown on the circuit diagram in FIG. 10. When the image sensor pixel has a small size, there is not enough room available within the column pitch to accommodate all the required pixel non-uniformity correction circuitry. The circuit schematic diagram shown in
Having described preferred embodiments of novel semiconductor Active Pixel CMOS image sensor with Two-Transistor Pixel, In-Pixel Non-uniformity Offset Correction, and Bootstrapped Reset Lines, which are intended to be illustrative and not limiting, it is noted that modification and variations can be made by persons skilled in the art in light of the teachings. It is therefore to be understood that changes may be made in the particular embodiments of the invention disclosed which are within the scope and spirit of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Having thus described the invention with the details and particularity required by the patent laws, what is claimed and desired protected by Letters Patent is set forth in the appended claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10178336, | Nov 07 2011 | The Johns Hopkins University | Flexible readout and signal processing in a computational sensor array |
7113215, | Feb 04 2002 | SOCIONEXT INC | CMOS image sensor |
7249299, | Aug 15 2003 | OmniVision Technologies, Inc | Bidirectional horizontal scan circuit with sub-sampling and horizontal adding functions |
7276748, | Feb 28 2005 | GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc | Body potential imager cell |
7538373, | Feb 28 2005 | GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc | Body potential imager cell |
8077236, | Mar 20 2008 | Aptina Imaging Corporation | Method and apparatus providing reduced metal routing in imagers |
8445829, | Jun 15 2010 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Active photosensing pixel |
8717335, | Jun 15 2010 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Active photosensing pixel |
8723096, | Jun 15 2010 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Active photosensing pixel with two-terminal photosensing transistor |
9052497, | Mar 10 2011 | KIng Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology | Computing imaging data using intensity correlation interferometry |
9099214, | Dec 11 2012 | KIng Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology; King Abdulaziz City Science and Technology | Controlling microparticles through a light field having controllable intensity and periodicity of maxima thereof |
9200954, | Nov 07 2011 | The Johns Hopkins University | Flexible readout and signal processing in a computational sensor array |
9380231, | Feb 17 2014 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Correlated double sampling circuit and image sensor including the same |
9723240, | Nov 07 2011 | The Johns Hopkins University | Flexible readout and signal processing in a computational sensor array |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5241575, | Dec 21 1989 | Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha | Solid-state image sensing device providing a logarithmically proportional output signal |
5861621, | Sep 10 1996 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Photosensor circuit having an initial setting unit |
6163023, | Dec 15 1997 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Amplified photoelectric transducer amplified solid-state image sensor and method for driving amplified photoelectric transducer |
6587146, | Nov 20 1998 | OmniVision Technologies, Inc | Three transistor active pixel sensor architecture with correlated double sampling |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jun 21 2001 | HYNECEK, JAROSLAV | Isetex, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 011945 | /0175 | |
Jun 28 2001 | ISETEC, Inc | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jun 30 2005 | Isetex, Inc | MANGACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR, LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 017701 | /0801 | |
May 14 2009 | MagnaChip Semiconductor, Ltd | Crosstek Capital, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022764 | /0270 | |
Jul 18 2011 | Crosstek Capital, LLC | Intellectual Ventures II LLC | MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 026637 | /0632 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 07 2009 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Feb 06 2009 | R2551: Refund - Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Feb 06 2009 | STOL: Pat Hldr no Longer Claims Small Ent Stat |
Feb 23 2010 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Feb 23 2010 | RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned. |
Jan 25 2013 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jan 26 2017 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 09 2008 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Feb 09 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 09 2009 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 09 2011 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 09 2012 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Feb 09 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 09 2013 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 09 2015 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 09 2016 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Feb 09 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 09 2017 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 09 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |