A fuel dispensing nozzle having a valve for controlling the flow of fuel to a spout attached to the nozzle. The nozzle spout includes three or more spaced apart protrusions that extend from an outer surface of the spout. If the outer spout surface is made from a non-electrically conductive material, the plurality of protrusions may be made from a electrically conductive material, and thus, provide electrical grounding to the nozzle. If the outer spout surface is made from a material having less than ideal wear properties, the plurality of protrusions may be used to provide wear protection to the outer surface.
|
13. A method of providing grounding to a non-metallic outer surface of a generally tubular fuel spout, said method comprising: manufacturing said spout to have three or more spaced apart metallic protrusions continuously extending from said outer surface, said protrusions projecting axially with respect to said spout from a proximal end located at the discharge of said spout and towards a distal end located at the inlet of said spout.
1. A fuel dispensing nozzle comprising:
a generally tubular spout attached to said nozzle for directing a fuel supply from a valve within said nozzle to a discharge end of said spout, said spout having an exterior surface; and,
wherein said spout has three or more spaced apart and fixed protrusions extending from said exterior surface and projecting axially with said generally tubular spout from said discharge end and towards said valve.
7. A fuel dispensing apparatus comprising:
a generally tubular spout having a first end for receiving a supply of fuel and a second end for discharging said supply of fuel, said spout having an exterior surface connecting said first end and said second end; and
said spout having three or more spaced apart ribs protruding from said exterior surface, said three or more ribs continuously attached to said exterior surface and extending from said second end and projecting axially with respect to said spout towards said first end.
2. The fuel dispensing nozzle of
3. The fuel dispensing nozzle of
4. The fuel dispensing nozzle of
5. The fuel dispensing nozzle of
6. The fuel dispensing nozzle of
8. The fuel dispensing apparatus of
9. The fuel dispensing apparatus of
10. The fuel dispensing apparatus of
11. The fuel dispensing apparatus of
12. The fuel dispensing apparatus of
14. The method of
15. The method of
16. The method of
|
The present invention is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/693,183 filed Oct. 24, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,854,491, entitled “Low Surface Energy Fuel Nozzle”. The patent application Ser. No. 10/693,183 is incorporated herein by this reference.
Not applicable to this application.
This invention relates to a fuel nozzle and more particularly to a fuel dispensing nozzle that has three or more spaced apart protrusions extending from an exterior surface of the nozzle spout.
Fuel dispensing nozzles are widely used and understood in the field. Early fuel nozzles are mainly comprised of a manual actuated valve and a metallic spout for directing fuel into a desired container. Many improvements have been made to fuel nozzles, including U.S. Pat. No. 4,453,578, which provide the means of automatically stopping fuel flow when the fuel reaches a desired level.
In addition, many design improvements have been made regarding nozzle spouts. U.S. Pat. No. 5,765,609 describes a method for manufacturing an aluminum spout that removably attaches to a nozzle body. Removable spouts enable them be replaced in shorter intervals than the more expensive nozzle body. Replacing a spout may be desirable when a nozzle is left in a motor vehicle after drive-away, upon considerable wear, or as improved spouts become available.
Recently, significant attention has been directed to the adverse environmental effects caused by fuel dispensing nozzles. One such effect is caused by fuel vapors displaced from a container as heavier liquid fuel is dispensed into the container. The displaced vapors contain volatile organics that chemically react with nitrogen oxides to form ground level ozone, often called “smog”. Ground level ozone can potentially cause irritation to the nose, throat, lungs and bring on asthma attacks. In addition, gasoline vapors are suspected to contain other harmful toxic chemicals, such as benzene.
In an effort to reduce the amount of harmful vapors that reach the atmosphere, a vapor recovery nozzle has been developed; one version of the spout is best described by U.S. Pat. No. 4,351,375. This version of a vapor recovery nozzle is comprised of a coaxial tube that both dispense fuel through a main tube and vacuum vapors through a secondary channel. A large percentage of the captured vapors are treated and safely released in the atmosphere. Vapor recovery systems are required by the laws of many states, especially at high volume stations or stations located in densely populated areas. California's Air Resource Board (CARB) is largely responsible for setting forth new standards for fuel dispensing nozzles.
Although vapor recovery has significantly reduced the amount of volatile organics that reach the atmosphere during fueling, there are several other sources of fuel vapors that contribute to the problem of “smog”. One such source is fuel dripped from a nozzle spout after fueling. Typically, when a nozzle is deactivated there is a delay before the user removes the nozzle spout from the container to be filled. If the delay is sufficient, drops from the spout will fall into the container. If the delay is insufficient, drops fall onto the ground or the local filling equipment. Spilt fuel evaporates into the atmosphere and contaminates the ground. Even waiting a significant amount of time before removing the nozzle will not ensure that drips will not occur. Some users try to supplement waiting by tapping the nozzle spout on the fill tube of the container prior to removing it.
Another source of “smog” is caused by fuel residing on the nozzle after fueling. Residual fuel is caused by adhesive forces between the nozzle surfaces and the fuel. Fuel can reside on both the inside and outside surfaces of a spout. As with dripping, residual fuel evaporates into the atmosphere.
In an effort to reduce sources of “smog” not directly addressed through vapor recovery, many new nozzle requirements and laws have been implemented. Many new nozzle designs are directed towards the goals of further reducing fuel vapor sources, such as U.S. Pat. No. 6,520,222, U.S. Pat. No. 5,603,364, U.S. Pat. No. 4,213,488, U.S. Pat. No. 5,645,116, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,620,032. Although the aforementioned patents may potentially serve in the direction of their intended purposes, most are unlikely to reliably provide true “dripless” performance. None of the aforementioned patents address the issue of residual fuel on the outside surface of a nozzle, caused by splashing. Many of the aforementioned patents are not compatible with both, standard type nozzles and vapor recovery type systems. Many of the aforementioned patents require substantial change over costs.
In these respects, the low surface-energy, fuel-dispensing nozzle according to the present invention substantially departs from conventional concepts of the prior art, and in doing so provides an apparatus primarily designed for the purpose of reducing the amount of vapor that reaches the atmosphere during a fueling cycle.
The present invention therefore aims at providing a nozzle that reduces the amount of residual fuel on the spout after a fueling cycle is completed. In addition, the present invention aims at reducing the number of drips that occur after the nozzle is removed from a container. The present invention is comprised of a fuel dispensing nozzle housing a valve for regulating fuel flow. Downstream of the valve is a tubular spout for directing the fuel towards or into a container. One or more of the surfaces of the tubular spout have a surface energy less than that of aluminum. The low surface energy surfaces cause the fuel to bead up rather than wet-out, as is the case with aluminum and aluminum alloys. Beading of droplets results in more drops falling into the container and less fuel to reside on the spout surfaces after fueling. The nozzle spout of the present invention may include three or more spaced apart protrusions that extend from a discharge end and towards the nozzle body. The three or more spaced apart protrusions provide electrical grounding to the nozzle and allow non-conductive spout materials to be used for the spout. Separately, or in addition, the spaced apart protrusions provide wear protection to the materials on the exterior surface of the spout. The protrusions are in a spaced apart relationship that ensures nozzle contact with the container to be filled.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are described below with the reference to the following accompanying drawings:
Many of the fastening, connection, manufacturing and other means and components utilized in this invention are widely known and used in the field of the invention are described, and their exact nature or type is not necessary for a person of ordinary skill in the art or science to understand the invention; therefore they will not be discussed in detail.
The term “rib” as used herein includes, without limitation, any protrusion from a surface, as well as any protrusion resulting from the removal of material into the surface.
As used herein, any surface X that is later referred to as X′ (prime) indicates that X has been improved, according to the present invention, to X′.
Applicant hereby incorporates by reference the following U.S. patents: U.S. Pat. No. 5,765,609; U.S. Pat. No. 5,603,364; U.S. Pat. No. 4,453,578 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,213,142.
Referring now to the drawings,
In many fuel nozzles, spout 20 is removably attached to nozzle body 11. Spout 20 is inserted into nozzle body 11 and the assembly is secured by means of a spout screw 19 (only hole shown). Spout 20 is sealed through the use of one or more o-rings (not shown). As shown in
As described by U.S. Pat. No. 5,765,609, a 6005-T5 aluminum material is viewed as an ideal choice for high volume spout production. It can be extruded, turned on a lathe, punched, bent, drilled and formed. In addition, aluminum is lightweight, relatively inexpensive compared to other lightweight materials, and provides the required rigidity and strength. Aluminum, and aluminum allows, are typically inert to the fuels they dispense and are electrically conductive. It can be easily seen why aluminum and aluminum alloys constitutes all, or nearly all, spouts in use today.
A significant drawback to the use of aluminum in spouts, and the direction of the present invention, is that aluminum causes unnecessary fuel dripping and liquid retention. Although the use of aluminum facilitates manufacturing low cost spouts, it is at the expense of releasing fuel vapors into the atmosphere. While many are designing “dripless” nozzles, the root cause has gone unsolved and unimproved.
The interaction of a liquid droplet and a surface is subject to physical laws and formulas. When a drop is placed onto a surface it can either wet-out into a very thin dispersed film, or it can bead up on the surface. The determination on whether a drop will wet-out or bead up is a function of the relative difference between the surface tension of the liquid in the drop, and the surface energy of the surface on which the drop is placed. A typical bead is shown in
With a horizontal surface (not shown) drop 50 will be symmetrical. In the case of a vertical surface, drop 50 is likely to deform in the direction of gravity, as shown by the arrow marked “G”. Thus,
In the case of aluminum spouts used for dispensing fuel, aluminum has a much higher surface energy than the surface tension of gasoline or diesel. Aluminum typically has a surface energy close to 45 dynes per centimeter and gasoline has a surface tension close to 21.6 dynes per centimeter. Diesel has a larger surface tension than gasoline at roughly 30 dynes per centimeter. Thus, it can easily be seen that with aluminum, a spout is easily wet-out by both gasoline and diesel. This creates a highly undesirable situation in terms of fuel drips, fuel retention, and vapors released into the atmosphere.
The present invention has been tested and shown to significantly reduce residual fuel on spout 20, in comparison to aluminum and other wet-able surfaces, such as an anodized aluminum, nylon, and ABS material. As a preferred embodiment of the invention, standard 6005-T5 aluminum surfaces from a commercially available OPW 11 series nozzle (a trademark of the Dover Resource Corporation) were coated with a fluoropolymer coating. PFA (perfluoroalkoxy), a member of the Teflon family (a trademark of DuPont), was chosen due to its ability to be applied at a low cost, its low surface energy (roughly 18 dynes per centimeter), its low porosity, and its chemical resistance to fuels. Using gasoline, improved inside direct contact surface 22′ was shown to reduce residual fuel by roughly 33% over unimproved direct contact surface 22. Further surface treatments and surface preparations, such as removing all burrs and scratches prior to coating are likely to make an increased improvement.
Now referring to
Although
It should be appreciated that reductions of drips and residual fuel on spouts is not limited to just standard (non-vapor recovery) nozzles as shown. Although providing the means to improve the environmental performance of non-vapor recovery nozzles is a significant feature of the present invention, the present invention can be applied to vapor recovery systems and new “dripless” nozzles. Wherein vapor recovery systems and “dripless” nozzles may eliminate a pound of gasoline vapor for dollars of equipment costs, the present invention can remove a pound of vapor for pennies in cost. The present invention can be incorporated in all types of nozzles with very little cost impact.
A “dripless” spout, similar to one described by U.S. Pat. No. 5,603,364, is shown in
In addition to “dripless” nozzles, the present invention is applicable to balance and assist vapor recovery systems. Although a vapor assist nozzle has not been tested, the present invention is likely to improve the environmental performance of such nozzles due to the fact that vapor assist nozzles typically use coaxial spouts and added features and orifices which all increase the surface areas subject to direct or indirect contact fuel. Any of such surfaces may be improved by the present invention, including vapor recovery passages made from nylon. In addition, vapor recovery offers improved performance due to the airflow it creates. As shown in
Even though a thin PFA coating has been disclosed as the best mode of the present invention, it is not limited to such and the present invention should not be construed to be limited to a fluorocarbon, a fluoropolymer, or a Teflon coating (trademark of Dupont). Many other materials may be applied, or used, to provide low surface energy surfaces. This includes materials which may be deposited by CVD, dipped, sprayed, and electrostatically deposited. In addition, the spout may be manufactured from a material that has a low surface energy, such as from a molding process for example. All fall within the spirit of the present invention.
Since many low surface energy materials are not electrically conductive,
While the low liquid retention fuel nozzle systems herein described constitute preferred embodiments of the invention, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to these precise form of assemblies, and that changes may be made therein without departing from the scope and sprit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Knight, Paul A., Takisaki, Walt D.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10669149, | Aug 02 2016 | OPW FUELING COMPONENTS, LLC | Dispensing nozzle with drip reduction |
11235966, | Aug 02 2016 | OPW FUELING COMPONENTS, LLC | Dispensing nozzle with self draining shutoff device |
11554949, | Aug 02 2016 | OPW FUELING COMPONENTS INC. | Nozzle with seal |
11673793, | Aug 02 2016 | OPW FUELING COMPONENTS, LLC | Fluid dispensing device with tapered nozzle |
11745999, | Aug 02 2016 | OPW FUELING COMPONENTS, LLC | Fuel dispensing device with expansion chamber |
9126820, | Feb 12 2013 | OPW FUELING COMPONENTS INC | Dispensing nozzle with fluid recapture |
9656851, | Mar 30 2012 | DRAM INNOVATIONS, INC | Method and apparatus for reducing residual fuel in a dispensing nozzle |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3224472, | |||
3946771, | Apr 23 1975 | Gasoline nozzle assembly | |
5327945, | Aug 11 1993 | Wayne Fueling Systems LLC | Fuel dispensing spout |
5813443, | Dec 07 1992 | DELAWARE CAPITAL FORMATION, INC , A CORP OF DELAWARE | Vapor recovery fuel nozzles |
6854491, | Oct 24 2003 | KnuBox Technologies | Low surface energy fuel nozzle |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 02 2004 | KnuBox Technologies | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Dec 02 2004 | KNIGHT, PAUL A | KnuBox Technologies | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016054 | /0007 | |
Dec 02 2004 | TAKISAKI, WALT D | KnuBox Technologies | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016054 | /0007 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 21 2009 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Feb 11 2010 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Feb 11 2010 | M2554: Surcharge for late Payment, Small Entity. |
Sep 27 2013 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Feb 14 2014 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Feb 14 2009 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Aug 14 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 14 2010 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Feb 14 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Feb 14 2013 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Aug 14 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 14 2014 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Feb 14 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Feb 14 2017 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Aug 14 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 14 2018 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Feb 14 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |