A system is provided for pro-actively suggesting communication features to users, comprising a tuple space for facilitating collaboration among software agents, a plurality of device agents for controlling operation of associated communication devices for respective ones of the users, and a plurality of user agents representing a plurality of users, each of the user agents (i) facilitating creation, by a user desirous of communicating, of groups of users to be communicated with, (ii) poking tuples to the tuple space indicative of each user's availability for communication; (iii) peeking anti-tuples to the tuple space for eliciting communication availability of respective ones of the users in the groups of users to be communicated with and in response causing associated device agents to display via respective ones of the devices the aforementioned availability to the user desirous of communicating, and to effect communication between the user desirous of communicating and a selected one of the respective users who is indicated as being available for communication.
|
6. A method of pro-actively presenting communication features to users, comprising:
facilitating creation by an associated user of groups of other ones of said users to communicate with;
posting tuples to said tuple space indicative of user availability for communication;
peeking anti-tuples to said tuple space for eliciting said user availability for a selected one of said groups and in response causing said device agents to display said availability via associated ones of said devices and to effect communication between said associated user and a selected one of the available users from the selected group.
1. A system for pro-actively suggesting communication features to users, comprising:
a tuple space for facilitating collaboration among software agents;
a plurality of device agents for controlling operation of associated communication devices for respective ones of said users; and
a plurality of user agents representing a plurality of users, each of said user agents (i) facilitating creation, by a user desirous of communicating, of groups of users to be communicated with, (ii) poking tuples to said tuple space indicative of each user's availability for communication; (iii) peeking anti-tuples to said tuple space for eliciting communication availability of respective ones of said users in said groups of users to be communicated with and in response causing associated device agents to display via respective ones of said devices said availability to said user desirous of communicating, and to effect communication between said user desirous of communicating and a selected one of said respective users who is indicated as being available for communication.
2. The system of
3. The system of
4. The system of
5. The system of
|
This invention relates generally to communication systems such as PBXs, and more particularly to a system for pro-actively suggesting beneficial communication to a user in a communication system.
Traditional PBX features are ‘reactive’ in the sense that they are triggered by user actions and take no action otherwise. Reactive features facilitate communications directed by a user. A user must take the initiative with all calls under the reactive feature model. Pro-active features, on the other hand, take the initiative and suggest communications that may be of benefit to the user.
Pro-active features are known in the art of computer science but are relatively new to the field of telephony. As discussed above, the initiation of communication has traditionally been left to the initiative of the user. Call-back is the only telephony feature that comes close to the idea of pro-active features. With Call-back, a user can ask the system to notify him/her when a busy line becomes free, and create a call between the user's telephone and the newly freed line. The system generates a special ring to the originating telephone and sets up the call upon the user going off-hook. In the context of pro-active features, the telephony Call-back feature suffers from a number of disadvantages. Firstly, the user is required to actively intervene in the process (i.e. go off-hook in response to the special ringing). Secondly, the feature accommodates only one user at a time. Lastly, the feature is temporary in the sense that it needs to be invoked by the user every time it is used, or after a daily timer expires (required to prevent confusion by removing long delayed call backs).
The inventor has recognized the desirability of a system for allowing a user to establish groups of people that he/she may wish to have voice collaboration with while working on a project or problem, pro-actively identifying a selected group based on the user's activity, and suggesting communication with available members of the group.
Currently ‘buddy lists’ are used on instant messaging systems like ICQ and AOL to indicate the availability status of other users that the user may wish to communicate with. These systems provide only one list per user and do not provide the capability of multiple lists or the selection of one of multiple lists depending on user needs. Thus, it is an object of an aspect of the present invention to extend the capability and enhance the usefulness of such “buddy lists” by providing the capability of selecting between lists either by direct user selection or by autonomous system action.
Busy lamp fields (BLFs) are also well-known for use in telephone systems to provide attendants with knowledge of the current busy/idle status of telephones in the system. BLFs are expensive and so are reserved for specialized attendant positions. They also indicate only the busy status of the users' telephones and not actual availability. Furthermore, BLFs show all users and the display is not in any way limited to those persons of current interest to a particular user.
According to the present invention, a system is provided for pro-actively suggesting features to a user based on information regarding the user's activities. For example, communication with available members of a user-defined group may be suggested by the system on the basis of a project or problem the user is working on. Thus, in operation the user can create a group which lists the people with whom the user is closely collaborating and with whom the user may wish to consult on a quick ad hoc basis on issues that arise out of work in progress. The user either selects a group to ascertain member availability or the system automatically selects a group based on the user's current activities (e.g. location of the user, electronic document the user is working on, etc.) Rather than consultation with a specific person, the system invites the user to consult with any available member of a group who has knowledge of what the user is working on at a particular time. Preferably, the system creates a display on the user's telephone or PC of the current availability of members of the group.
Thus, the user is not required to make a series of provisional calls to find someone that he/she can quickly consult with. Instead, the system pro-actively suggests immediate communication with available ones of his/her collaborators. This improves group activities and so improves enterprise efficiency. Improved communication is thereby facilitated within the enterprise, which encourages the forms of trust (competence, integrity and inter-personal) that are needed to allow people to cooperate in an enterprise. It has been demonstrated in sociological research that the encouragement of such trust in an organization improves both execution and innovation.
The system according to the present invention also provides services for multiple groups with which the user is collaborating. As indicated above, the user may either select a particular group or the system can suggest a group based on the user's activities, in response to which the display changes to reflect the availability of members in that group. This greatly increases the efficiency of the user in a work environment involving multiple contemporaneous projects with multiple teams. These teams or groups can be created on an ad-hoc basis since the required information is easy to enter into the system.
A detailed description of the invention is set forth herein below, with reference to the following drawings, wherein:
Before discussing the invention is detail, a brief introduction is set forth below of the basic structure and operation of a tuple space.
A tuple space is a set of type/value ordered pairs called ingles. Each ingle consists of a type (e.g. Name) and a value (e.g. John Doe). Thus, a tuple which describes an employee for a company could, for example, be:
The tuple space enables coordination by allowing queries based on the matching of tuples by anti-tuples. An anti tuple is a tuple that can be used as a query in the tuple space. In form, it is identical to a tuple except that the value of any or all fields may be replaced by a ‘?’ which indicates a ‘don't care’ condition. Tuple spaces are set up to match tuples with anti-tuples which agree in all fields except for the one(s) indicated by the ? query, which acts as a “wild card”. Thus the anti tuple:
Additional operations may be provided such as disclosed in UK Mitel Patent Application No. Mitel #520 entitled ‘Tuple Space Operations for Fine Grained Control’.
Turning to
Each of the user agents 1 places a tuple in the tuple space to indicate the user's current availability (e.g. the user may directly communicate user availability to his/her agent or the agent may gather information from the user's current work status, calendar entries, location, etc.) The method of gathering this information is outside of the scope of the present invention but would be well understood be a person of ordinary skill in the art having regard to existing prior art such as disclosed in Ferguson and Davlouros (Ferguson, Innes A. and Davlouros, James D. 1995. PeopleFinder: A Multimodal Multimedia Communications Tool for Interconnecting Network Users. Also, the Working Notes of the IJCAI-95 Workshop on Intelligent Multimedia Information Retrieval, Montreal, PQ, August) describe a system where user location and activity is surmised from their activity (or lack thereof) on a computer network.
The tuple used to indicate the user's current availability is of the form:
<Application>
<pro-active>
<User_Name>
<Doris_Leafloof@mitel.com>
{ unique user name
<Available>
<Yes>
{ Yes or No
Any user can create multiple groups of other users (referred to herein as ‘Pro-active Feature Groups’ (PFGs)) with whom he/she wishes to have periodic ad hoc communication. Each PFG is identified by a Group_Name, Project_ID and a list of unique user names. Thus, with reference to the group shown in
<Group_Name>< Switch Group>
<Project_ID>
<X01-704-2X59-262>
<User>
<Doris_Leafloor@mitel.com>
<User>
<Judy_Weirich@mitel.com>
<User>
<Helmuth_Krausbar@mitel.com>
<User>
<Nick_Tsiakas@mitel.com>
<User>
<Bryan_Mcconnell@mitel.com>
<User>
<Ernst_Munter@mitel.com>
<User>
<Lee_Cox@mitel.com>
<User>
<Janet_Bell@mitel.com>
Thus, the file consists of a unique name for the group, <Group_Name>, a field to indicate which project this group is associated with, <Project_ID> and unique names for the users whose availability is to be monitored <User>. In common with standard practice, an Email address format is used for the unique user name, although other formats may be used.
Once the user has programmed in various desired groups, he/she can then communicate with his/her user agent 1 to indicate which group of the programmed multiple groups he/she wishes to work with. Alternatively, the user agent 1 can suggest a group to the user based on information derived from other sources. For example, the user agent 1 may determine what project a user is working on by noting his/her physical location, the computer files he/she is using, information in his/her electronic calendar or by other pertinent information. This information can be used to relate the user's activities to a group via information contained in the <Project_ID> field of the PFG. The user agent 1 uses this information to determine which group the user wishes to communicate with.
Once a group has been selected, the user agent 1 initially determines the current status of each of the members of the group by peeking anti-tuples into the tuple space 7, where each anti-tuple is of the form:
<Application>
<pro-active>
<User_Name>
<Doris_Leafloor@mitel.com>
<Available>
<?>
The user agent 1 is then provided with information on availability of all users whose agents have registered their availability in the tuple space 7. Any user agent 1 who has not registered its user's availability is therefore deemed to be unavailable. The user agent 1 then conveys the user availability information to the user in an appropriate format (e.g. the format of
<Button> <0>
<User> <Doris_Leafloor@mitel.com>
<Available> <No>
The associated device agent 3 uses this information to properly update the user's communication device 5 in order to display the necessary information and implement call set up, as shown in
Variations and modifications of the invention are contemplated. All such alternative embodiments are believed to fall within the sphere and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5197096, | Jun 23 1989 | Hitachi, Ltd.; Hitachi Microcomputer Engineering Ltd. | Switching method and apparatus having subscriber state management function |
5963947, | Jan 27 1998 | International Business Machines Corporation | Technique of dynamically adding functionality from a client to manipulated data at a server |
5974420, | Jan 27 1998 | International Business Machines Corporation | Information exchange operator for a tuplespace |
5987113, | Dec 23 1996 | RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC | Long distance phone tag service |
20020146097, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 05 2002 | Mitel Knowledge Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 25 2009 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 25 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 25 2010 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 25 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 25 2013 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 25 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 25 2014 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 25 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 25 2017 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 25 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 25 2018 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 25 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |