The invention relates to a investment casting shell molds and their method of manufacture. The method entails mixing fiber and refractory filler to form a dry blend; mixing the dry blend with a binder sol to form a refractory slurry, and employing the refractory slurry to produce an investment casting shell mold.
|
1. A method of manufacturing an investment casting shell mold comprising:
providing first and second refractory coat slurries wherein at least one of said slurries is formed from a dry blend including fiber and refractory filler, said dry blend being mixed with a binder sol to form said slurry;
applying one of said first and second refractory coat slurries over an expendable pattern to produce a coated preform;
optionally, applying a stucco of refractory material onto the coated preform;
drying the optionally stuccoed, coated preform sufficiently to apply another of said first or second refractory coat slurries over the preform;
repeating the application of refractory slurry and optionally stuccoing as many times as necessary to build a preform of desired thickness, provided said preform includes at least one layer of refractory coat slurry formed from said dry blend;
drying the multi-layered preform to produce a green investment casting shell mold; and
heating the green shell mold to a temperature sufficient to produce a fired investment casting shell mold.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
6. The method of
7. The method of
8. The method of
9. The method of
11. The method of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/750,425 filed on Dec. 30, 2003 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/005,881 filed Nov. 8, 2001 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,814,131) which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/247,935 filed Nov. 10, 2000. The disclosures of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to improved methods and compositions for investment casting technology.
Investment casting by the lost wax process can be traced to ancient Egypt and China. The process as practiced today, however, is a relatively new technology dating to the 1930's and represents a rapidly growing business and science. Investment casting technology simplifies production of complex metal shapes by casting molten metal into expendable ceramic shell molds formed around disposable wax preforms which duplicate the desired metal shape. “Precision Investment Casting”, i.e., PIC, is the term in the art that refers to this technology.
The conventional PIC process employs six major steps:
1. Preform Preparation:
A disposable positive preform of the desired metal casting is made from a thermoplastic material such as wax that will melt, vaporize or burn completely so as not to leave contaminating residues in the de-waxed ceramic shell mold. The positive preform is prepared by injecting the thermoplastic material into a negative, segmented, metal die or “tool” designed to produce preforms of the shape, dimension and surface finish required for the metal casting. Single or multiple preforms can be assembled by fusing them to a disposable wax “sprue system” that feeds molten metal to fill the shell mold;
2. Shell Mold Construction by:
3. Dewaxing—The disposable wax preform is removed from the “green” air dried shell mold by steam autoclaving, plunging the green shell mold into a flash de-waxing furnace heated to 1000° F.–1900° F., or by any other method which rapidly heats and liquefies the wax so that excessive pressure build-up does not crack the shell mold.
4. Furnacing—The de-waxed shell mold is heated at about 1600° F.–2000° F. to remove volatile residues and form stable ceramic bonds in the shell mold.
5. Pouring—The heated shell mold is recovered from the furnace and positioned to receive molten metal. The metal may be melted by gas, indirect arc, or induction heating. The molten metal may be cast in air or in a vacuum chamber. The molten metal may be poured statically or centrifugally, and from a ladle or a direct melting crucible. The molten metal is cooled to produce a solidified metal casting in the mold.
6. Casting recovery—The shell molds having solidified metal castings therein are broken apart and the metal castings are separated from the ceramic shell material. The castings can be separated from the sprue system by sawing or cutting with abrasive disks. The castings can be cleaned by tumbling, shot or grit blasting.
Investment casting shell molds tend to be fragile and prone to breakage. In an effort to improve the strength of investment casting shell molds, small amounts of chopped refractory fibers and or in combination with chopped organic fibers have been added to aqueous refractory slurries. Refractory slurries which include these small amounts of chopped refractory fibers enable application of thicker coatings to a preform. These slurries, however, require significant additions of polymer to achieve satisfactory green strength and flow properties of the slurry.
A need therefore exists for materials and methods which provide investment casting shell molds which have improved strength and avoids the disadvantages of the prior art.
The invention relates to rapidly forming a ceramic shell mold on an expendable preform, and to the ceramic shell molds obtained thereby. Generally, the present invention relates to compositions used to form investing cast shell molds comprising a refractory dry blend including-fiber and a refractory filler and a suitable binder sol which is mixed with dry blend to form a refractory coat slurry.
Thus, the invention teaches the technique of blending fiber with refractory filler to form a dry blend and then mixing that dry blend with colloidal silica or other suitable sol to form an investment casting slurry. That slurry is then employed in the investment casting process in the production of shell molds; the shell molds are “dewaxed,” fired and cast as is known in the art. Fibers can be inorganic or organic, chopped or milled. Refractory fillers such as fused silica, zircon, alumina, alumina silica, or others can be used. The refractory filler can contain a variety of particle sizes ranging from micro fines of a few microns or less to fines of −120 to −325 mesh to coarse aggregate of 10 to 40 mesh. The dry blends containing fiber and refractory filler are easy and convenient to use and help assure slurry uniformity. Shells made by the methods described herein are shown to have significant advantages over those produced with slurries absent the above-noted dry blend.
With regard to the various methods described herein, most generally the methods of manufacturing include the steps of providing first and second refractory coat slurries wherein at least one of said slurries is formed from a dry blend including fiber and refractory filler, said dry blend being mixed with an aqueous colloidal sol to form said slurry; applying one of said first and second refractory coat slurries over an expendable pattern to produce a coated preform; optionally, applying a stucco of refractory material onto the coated preform; drying the optionally stuccoed, coated preform sufficiently to apply another of said first or second refractory coat slurries over the preform; repeating the application of refractory slurry and optionally stuccoing as many times as necessary to build a preform of desired thickness, provided said preform includes at least one layer of refractory coat slurry formed from said dry blend; drying the multi-layered preform to produce a green investment casting shell mold; and heating the green shell mold to a temperature sufficient to produce a fired investment casting shell mold.
The filler may have a particle size of between about 20 mesh to about 600 mesh, preferably about −120 mesh to about −325 mesh. The filler may be employed in admixture with calcined coke.
The first dry blend is mixed with a first colloidal sol to form a first slurry. The second dry blend is mixed with a second colloidal sol which may be the same or different from the first colloidal sol to form a second slurry which may be the same or different from the first slurry. Useful colloidal sols include but are not limited to colloidal silica sol, colloidal silica sol modified by latex, ethyl silicate, ionic silicates, or mixtures thereof, preferably colloidal silica.
A coating of the first slurry is applied onto an expendable preform such as plastic or wax to produce a preform. The preform then is stuccoed with refractory material and dried. A coating of the second slurry then is applied onto the stuccoed preform. Stucco of refractory material is applied to the second layer to build up the preform which then is dried. The expendable preform is removed to produce a green shell mold which is fired to produce a ceramic shell mold.
In yet another aspect of the invention, a first slurry is applied to an expendable preform which is stuccoed and dried. At least one additional layer of the first slurry is then applied, stuccoed and dried to produce a preform that has multiple layers formed from the first slurry. A second slurry is then applied, stuccoed and dried. A plurality of layers of the second slurry may also be applied. The expendable preform is removed and the resulting green shell mold is fired to produce a ceramic shell mold. The first prime coat slurry may be formed by mixing one or more ceramic fillers with a colloidal sol. A dry blend of one or more ceramic fillers with fibers such as ceramic fibers or organic fibers such as nylon and polypropylene also may be mixed with a colloidal sol to form the first slurry. The second slurry may be formed by mixing a dry blend of one or more ceramic fillers with fibers such as ceramic fibers or organic fibers such as nylon and polypropylene. Colloidal sols employed in the slurries may be the same or different. Useful colloidal sols include but are not limited to colloidal silica sol, colloidal silica sol modified by latex, ethyl silicate, ionic silicates, and mixtures thereof, preferably colloidal silica sol and colloidal silica sol modified by latex.
In still another aspect of the invention, one or more ceramic fillers are admixed with a colloidal sol to produce a first slurry that is substantially free of fiber. A second slurry is formed by mixing a blend of fiber and ceramic filler admixed with a colloidal sol. Fibers which may be used in the second slurry include but are not limited to ceramic fibers, glass fibers, and organic fibers. Useful organic fibers include but are not limited to nylon and polypropylene. The ceramic filler used in the second slurry may be the same or different from any of the ceramic fillers used in the first slurry. Colloidal sols used in the first and second slurries also may be the same or different. Colloidal sols which may be used in the first and second slurries include, but are not limited to, colloidal silica sol, and colloidal silica sol modified by polymers such as latex, ethyl silicate, ionic silicates, and mixtures thereof, preferably colloidal silica sol and colloidal silica sol modified by latex.
In this aspect of the invention, the first slurry is applied onto an expendable preform that is stuccoed and dried to produce a stuccoed preform. The second slurry is then applied, stuccoed and dried to build up the preform. A plurality of layers formed from the second slurry may be applied. The expendable preform then is removed and the resulting green shell mold is fired to produce a ceramic shell mold.
The invention offers a number of advantages for the manufacture of ceramic shell molds over the prior art. For example, forming dry blends of fibers and ceramic filler enables easy addition of ceramic filler and fibers to the colloidal sol binder without the need to continuously mix or re-mix the colloidal sol and fiber pre-blend prior to use. Another advantage is that the fibers do not need to be pre-dispersed in a liquid binder or combined with a polymeric addition prior to adding ceramic filler. A further advantage is that use of polymeric binder additives to achieve improved green strength is not required. Another advantage is that the invention avoids the prior art problem of fiber agglomeration under high shear mixing. A further advantage is that the slurries which use dry blends which include fiber build thicker coatings. Use of slurries which employ dry blends which include fiber also build more uniform shells of greater thickness compared to slurries which employ blends that do not include fiber.
Dry Blends
Dry blends which may be used in the various aspects of the invention include one or more ceramic fillers, and one or more ceramic fillers with fibers such as ceramic fibers and organic fibers by way of non-limiting example. Ceramic fillers which may be employed include but are not limited to fused silica, alumina, and aluminosilicates such as mullite, kyanite, and molochite, zircon, chromite, rice hull ash, calcined coke and mixtures thereof. The ceramic filler typically is about 20 mesh to about 600 mesh, preferably −120 mesh to about −325 mesh.
Ceramic fibers which may be employed typically have but are not limited to those which have an aspect ratio of length to width of about 20:1. Examples of useful ceramic fibers include but are limited to Orleans One fiber of Wollastonite from the Orleans Resource Group, located in Quebec, Canada, NIAD G fiber of Wollastonite from NYCO Minerals Co. in Willsboro, N.Y., metal fibers, aramid fibers, carbon fibers, as well as chopped or milled ceramic fibers such as aluminosilicates such as mullite, oxides such as alumina and zirconia, nitrides such as silicon nitride, carbon, and carbides such as silicon carbide, and mixtures thereof. Chopped and milled ceramic fibers are commercially available from numerous sources such as Thermal Ceramics Corp.
Glass fibers which may be employed in the dry blends include but are not limited to chopped and milled glass fibers. Chopped glass fibers which may be employed include but are not limited to E-glass fibers and S-glass fibers and mixtures thereof. Examples of E-glass fibers which may be employed include but are not limited to those which measure about 3 mm to about 6 mm long and have a diameter of about 10 microns such as those from PPG Industries, Shelby, N.C. under the trade name Chop Vantage 8610. Chopped S-glass fibers which may be employed include but are not limited to those which measure about 3 mm to about 6 mm long and have a diameter of about 10 microns such as those available from AGY Inc. Aiken, S.C. Examples of useful milled E-glass fibers include but are not limited to 731ED 3 mm floccular fibers which have a length of about 0.125 inch, an average diameter of 15.8 microns and a bulk density of 0.17 gm/cm3 from Owens Corning Co.
Organic fibers which may be employed in the dry blends include but are not limited to olefins, amides, aramids, polyesters and cellulose fibers. Examples of olefins which may be used include but are not limited to polyethylene and polypropylene such as those from Minifibers, Inc. Examples of amide fibers include nylon fibers such as those from Wex Chemical Co. Examples of aramid fibers which may be used include but are not limited to Kevlar from DuPont and Twaron from Akzo Nobel. Examples of polyester fibers which may be used include those from Wex Chemical Co. Examples of cellulose fibers include those from Interfibe Corp.
In the dry blends, the amount of fiber may be varied over a wide range. Where a dry blend includes an admixture of ceramic fiber, glass fiber and ceramic filler, ceramic fiber may be about 1 wt. % to about 10 wt. % by weight of the dry blend, glass fiber may be about 0.5 wt. % to about 10 wt. % by weight of the dry blend, and ceramic filler may be about 80 wt. % to about 98.5 wt. % by weight of the dry blend.
Where a dry blend includes an admixture of ceramic fiber, glass fiber, ceramic filler, and organic fiber, ceramic fiber may be about 1 wt. % to about 10 wt. % by weight of the dry blend, glass fiber may be about 0.5 wt. % to about 10 wt. % by weight of the dry blend, and ceramic filler may be about 76 wt. % to about 98 wt. % by weight of the dry blend, and organic fiber may be about 0.3 wt. % to about 4 wt. % by weight of the dry blend.
Where a dry blend includes an admixture of ceramic fiber, ceramic filler, and organic fiber, the ceramic fiber may be about 0.5 wt. % to about 10 wt. % by weight of the dry blend, ceramic filler may be about 86 wt. % to about 98.2 wt. % by weight of the dry blend, and organic fiber may be about 0.3 wt. % to about 4.0 wt. % by weight of the dry blend.
Where a dry blend includes an admixture of ceramic fiber and ceramic filler, the ceramic fiber may be about 1 wt. % to about 10 wt. % by weight of the dry blend, and ceramic filler may be about 90 wt. % to about 99 wt. % by weight of the dry blend.
Where a dry blend includes an admixture of organic fiber and ceramic filler, the organic fiber may be about 0.3 wt. % to about 5 wt. % by weight of the dry blend, and ceramic filler may be about 99.7 wt. % to about 95 wt. % by weight of the dry blend.
Preparation of Refractory Slurries
A refractory slurry for use as a prime coat slurry or a backup coat slurry is prepared by mixing a dry blend with a colloidal sol. Preferably the sol is an aqueous colloidal silica sol available under the trade name Megasol® from Wesbond, Inc., Wilmington, Del. Megasol® aqueous silica sols are available in a range of pH values, titratable Na2O contents, as well as solids contents. Megasol® aqueous silica sols have an average particle size of about 40 nanometer, a particle size range of about 6 nm to about 190 nm, and a standard deviation of particle sizes of about 20 nm. The pH of the Megasol® aqueous silica sols may vary from about 8.0 to about 10.0, preferably about 9.0 to about 9.5; the titratable Na2O content can vary from about 0.02% to about 0.5%, preferably about 0.1% to about 0.25%, most preferably about 0.20% to about 0.22%, and a solids content of about 30% to about 50%, preferably about 40 to about 47% solids content, more preferably, about 45% solids content. Other aqueous colloidal silica sols such as MegaPrime from Buntrock Industries, Inc. Williamsburg, Va.; Nyacol 830 from EKA Chemical Co., Nalcoag 1130 and Nalcoag 1030 from Nalco Chemical Co., as well as Ludox SM-30 and Ludox HS-30 from W.R. Grace & Co., may be used.
The slurries are generally prepared by placing a colloidal sol, preferably a colloidal silica sol, more preferably Megasol® into a clean, water rinsed mixing tank and adding the dry blend of material while mixing. Various mixing devices known in the art may be employed in the mixing tank. These devices include, for example, propeller type mixers, jar mills, high speed dispersion mixers, and turntable fixed blade mixers. The dry blend is added while mixing until a suitable viscosity is reached.
For the first slurries, which are often used as prime coats, a suitable viscosity is typically about 18–30 seconds #5 Zahn, preferably 20–30 sec, most preferably 24–30 sec. For the second slurries, which are often used as back up coats, suitable viscosities typically are about 10–18 sec. viscosity #5 Zahn, preferably about 10–16 sec. #5 Zahn, most preferably about 12–15 sec #5 Zahn. Additional mixing of any of the slurries can be performed to remove entrapped air and to reach equilibrium. A final viscosity adjustment can be made by adding additional Megasol® colloidal silica sol binder or refractory material, as well as non-ionic surfactants and anionic surfactants.
Various refractory slurry compositions may be used as first and second slurries. The specific slurry composition is determined by the characteristics desired in the ceramic shell mold in order to produce a metal casting of desired dimensions and surface finish. For example, useful first slurries, especially when used as prime coats, employ fine size refractory grain, typically about −200 mesh to about −325 mesh. Examples of useful prime coat slurries include Megasol® together with a blend of −200 mesh fused silica and −325 mesh zircon refractory grain. The zircon refractory grain provides high resistance to molten metal. The fine particle size of the zircon also enables production of castings which have smooth, detailed surface finishes. In these types of prime coat slurries which employ a ceramic filler of both fused silica and zircon, the fused silica suitably can have sizes such as about −100 mesh, about −120 mesh, about −140 mesh, about −170 mesh, about −270 mesh and about −325 mesh, most preferably about −120 to about −200 mesh. The zircon suitably can have a particle size such as about −200 mesh, about −325 mesh and about −400 mesh, preferably, about −200 mesh, most preferably about −325 mesh.
Such first slurries also may include one or more non-ionic surfactants. A particularly useful non-ionic surfactant is PS9400 available from Buntrock Industries, Williamsburg, Va. This surfactant improves the ability of the slurry to wet a wax preform and assists in drainage. Surfactants may be added to the slurry in various amounts depending on the composition. For example, where the slurry includes a dry blend of fused silica and zircon with Megasol®, a surfactant may be used in an amount of up to about 0.2% based on the weight of the Megasol®.
The second slurries, especially when used as backup slurries, generally employ coarser refractory grain sizes than are used in the first slurries. For example, in backup slurries where fused silica is employed as a ceramic filler, the fused silica typically has a particle size of about −80 mesh to about −270 mesh, preferably about −100 mesh to about −200 mesh, most preferably, about −100 mesh to about −120 mesh. The amounts of dry blend and aqueous colloidal silica sol used to form a backup slurry may vary over a wide range. Typically, the dry blend may be about 54 wt. % to about 70 wt. % based on the total weight of the slurry, remainder aqueous silica sol.
Manufacture of refractory slurries illustrative of the invention is described below by reference to the following non-limiting examples.
This example illustrates forming refractory slurry by mixing a dry blend that includes ceramic filler, refractory fiber, and glass fiber and mixing that dry blend with an aqueous colloidal silica sol.
100 grams Orleans One refractory fiber of Wollastonite, 20 grams 731 ED ⅛″ milled E-glass fiber, and a ceramic filler that includes 715 gms fused Silica 120 (120 mesh fused silica from C-E Minerals Co., Greeneville, Tenn.) and 715 gms fused Silica 200 (200 mesh fused silica from C-E Minerals Co., Greeneville, Tenn.) are dry mixed to form a dry blend. The dry blend is mixed with 1000 gms of Megasol® that has a solids content of 45%, a pH of 9.5 and a titratable Na2O content of 0.2% to form a refractory slurry.
This example illustrates forming a refractory slurry by mixing a dry blend that includes ceramic filler, refractory fiber, glass fiber, and organic polymeric fiber and mixing that dry blend with an aqueous colloidal silica sol.
100 grams Orleans One refractory fiber of Wollastonite, 20 grams 731 ED ⅛″ milled E-glass fiber, a ceramic filler that includes 715 gms fused Silica 120 and 715 gms fused Silica 200 are dry mixed with 20 grams polyethylene fiber that has a length of 1 mm and a diameter of 25 micron to form a dry blend.
The dry blend is mixed with 1000 gms of the Megasol® of example 1 to form a refractory slurry.
This example illustrates forming a refractory slurry by mixing a dry blend that includes ceramic filler, refractory fiber and organic polymeric fiber and mixing that dry blend with an aqueous colloidal silica sol.
Polyethylene fiber that has a length of 1 mm and a diameter of 20 microns to form a dry blend.
The dry blend is mixed with 1000 gms of the Megasol® of example 1 to form a refractory slurry.
This example illustrates forming a refractory slurry by mixing a dry blend that includes ceramic filler, glass fiber and organic polymeric fiber and mixing that dry blend with an aqueous colloidal silica sol.
100 grams 731 ED ⅛″ milled E-glass fiber, 20 grams polyethylene fiber having a length of 1 mm and a diameter of 25 microns, and a ceramic filler that includes 715 gms fused Silica 120 and 715 gms fused Silica 200 are dry mixed to form a dry blend.
The dry blend is mixed with 1000 gms of the Megasol® of example 1 to form refractory slurry.
This example illustrates forming a refractory slurry by mixing a dry blend that includes refractory fiber and glass fiber and mixing that dry blend with a blend of an aqueous colloidal silica sol and ceramic filler.
100 grams Orleans One refractory fiber of Wollastonite and 20 grams 731 ED ⅛″ milled E-glass fiber mixed dry to form a dry blend.
The dry blend is admixed with a mixture that includes 1000 gms of the Megasol® of example 1 and a ceramic filler that includes 715 gms fused Silica 120 and 715 gms fused Silica 200 to form a refractory slurry.
This example illustrates forming a refractory slurry by mixing a dry blend that includes refractory fiber, glass fiber and organic polymeric fiber and mixing that dry blend with a blend of an aqueous colloidal silica sol and ceramic filler.
100 grams Orleans One refractory fiber of Wollastonite, 20 grams polyethylene fiber having a length of 1 mm and a diameter of 25 microns, and 100 grams 731 ED ⅛″ milled E-glass fiber are mixed dry to form a dry blend.
The dry blend is admixed with a mixture that includes 1000 gms of the Megasol® of example 1 and a ceramic filler that includes 715 gms fused Silica 120 and 715 gms fused Silica 200 to form a refractory slurry.
This example illustrates forming a refractory slurry by mixing a dry blend that includes ceramic filler and glass fiber and mixing that dry blend with an aqueous colloidal silica sol.
100 grams 731 ED ⅛″ milled E-glass fiber and a ceramic filler that includes 715 gms fused Silica 120 and 715 gms fused Silica 200 are dry mixed to form a dry blend.
The dry blend is mixed with 1000 gms of the Megasol® of example 1 to form a refractory slurry.
This example illustrates forming refractory slurry by mixing a dry blend that includes ceramic filler and refractory fiber with an aqueous colloidal silica sol.
100 grams Orleans One refractory fiber of Wollastonite and a ceramic filler that includes 715 gms fused Silica 120 and 715 gms fused Silica 200 are dry mixed to form a dry blend.
The dry blend is mixed with 1000 gms of the Megasol® of example 1 to form a refractory slurry.
This example illustrates forming a refractory slurry by mixing a dry blend that includes ceramic filler and glass fiber with an aqueous colloidal silica sol.
20 grams 731 ED ⅛″ milled E-glass fiber and a ceramic filler that includes 715 gms fused Silica 120 and 715 gms fused Silica 200 are dry mixed to form a dry blend.
The dry blend is mixed with 1000 gms of the Megasol® of example 1 to form a refractory slurry.
Ceramic Shell Mold
In forming a ceramic shell mold, a disposable preform, preferably a wax preform such as filled or unfilled paraffin based investment casting grade wax or microcrystalline wax, is dipped into a first slurry to coat the surface of the preform with a continuous layer. Typically, one to three coatings are applied. The coat(s) applied can have thicknesses of about 0.02″ to 0.2″, preferably 0.04″ to 0.2″, most preferably 0.04″ to 0.1″. The coated preform is drained thoroughly to remove excess slurry, and then stuccoed with fine grained, refractory stucco to produce a stuccoed perform. The perform is then dried prior to application of any additional coats of either the first slurry or the second slurry. Preferably, the perform will include a plurality of layers such that the perform includes at least one coat of both the first and second slurries. As should be appreciated, stuccoing followed by some degree of drying may occur with each successive application of a first or second slurry to the perform.
The drying time between successive slurry coats depends on the complexity of the shape of the disposable preform. Disposable preforms which have deep cavities where airflow is minimal take longer to dry between coats. Drying can be performed at about 60° F. to about 90° F., preferably about 70° F. to about 75° F. Drying may be performed under accelerated conditions of low humidity and high temperature with rapid air movement. A thickness of ceramic shell mold of about 0.20 inch to about 0.5 inch is sufficient for most castings. Thus, the application of two coats of the first slurry to five coats of the second slurry, with stuccoing generally, yield a 0.25 inch thick ceramic shell mold that has a strength sufficient to withstand dewaxing and furnacing.
A wide variety of refractory grains may be used as stucco for application to the slurry coats. Examples of useful refractory grains include but are not limited to mullite, calcined china clay and other aluminosilicates, vitreous and crystalline silica, alumina, zircon and chromite. The refractory grains preferably are free of ionic contaminants in amounts that can contribute to instability of the refractory grains and to thermally induce phase changes during metal casting. As is known in the art, refractory grains which are free from contaminants in amounts that can contribute to instability of the refractory grains can be produced by purification with or without calcining.
Refractory grains for application as stucco to the first slurry when used as a prime coat include but are not limited to zircon sand of about −70 mesh to about 200 mesh, preferably about −70 to about 140 mesh. The refractory grains which may be used as stucco on the coats of the second slurry when used as backup coats may vary from about −10 mesh to about 200 mesh, preferably about −20 mesh to about 50 mesh. Most preferably, the refractory grains have a size of about −30 mesh to about 50 mesh.
In an alternative embodiment, a transitional stucco refractory material, preferably zircon or an alumino silicate which has a grain size intermediate between the fine and coarse grained stucco, such as a grain size of about −50 mesh to about +100 mesh, may be applied after the application of a second slurry coat over a first slurry coat. The transitional stucco can be used to add strength and to minimize the possibility of delamination between slurry coating layers of varied composition.
Dewaxing
The ceramic shell molds may be dewaxed by methods such as immersion into boiling water, steam autoclaving, and flash dewaxing as is known in the art. Steam autoclaving may be performed by:
1. Using as high a steam pressure as possible, preferably about 60 PSI or higher, more preferably about 80–90 PSI.
2. Closing and pressurizing the autoclave as rapidly as possible, preferably in less than about 15 to 20 seconds.
3. Exposing the air dried green shell to the steam for about 10 to 15 minutes.
4. Slowly depressurizing the autoclave over about 30 to 60 seconds.
Flash dewaxing may be performed by plunging the air dried green shell mold into a furnace heated to about 1000° F. to about 1900° F. At these temperatures, the wax next to the wall of the ceramic shell rapidly melts so that the pressure due to expansion of the wax does not crack the ceramic shell. The ceramic shell may then be removed to a cooler temperature zone of about 200° F. to 600° F. to complete the removal of the wax. The melted wax can drain through a bottom opening in the melting chamber into a water bath or reservoir for recovery.
Furnacing
Furnacing entails heating the dewaxed ceramic shell mold to about 1600° F. to about 2000° F. to remove volatile residues and to produce a high strength, fired ceramic shell mold. The dewaxed ceramic shell mold is held in the furnace to attain thermal equilibrium, after which it is retrieved from the furnace and cast with the desired molten metal.
Manufacture of ceramic shell molds is illustrated below by reference to the following non-limiting examples:
An 8 inch by ⅞ inch by ⅜ inch wax bar preform 1 as shown in
Wax preform 1 is dipped into the refractory slurry for 8 seconds, removed, and allowed to drain for 10 seconds to form a first coat. Zircon sand that has a particle size range of −70 to 140 mesh available from DuPont Corp. is applied as stucco to the first coat. The resulting, stuccoed, coated wax preform is dried for 30 minutes at 75° F., and then again dipped into the refractory slurry for 8 seconds to form a second coat and again stuccoed with the zircon sand of −70 to 140 mesh.
Wax preform 1 having two coats then is dipped into the refractory slurry for eight seconds and drained for ten seconds. The coated product is stuccoed with Tecosil −50+100 mesh fused silica available from C-E Minerals to form an intermediate stuccoed preform. The intermediate stuccoed preform then is dried for 30 minutes at 75° F. The intermediate stuccoed preform is dipped into the refractory slurry and stuccoed with Tecosil −30+50 mesh fused silica. The stuccoed, backup coated preform then is dried at 75° F. This cycle of dipping, draining, stuccoing, and drying is repeated to provide a total of five additional coats.
After formation of each coat or layer, portions of vertical sides 5 and lateral sides 1B of preform 1 are scraped to remove the coats and the stucco to produce a ceramic shell mold 10 as shown in
A section of ceramic shell 20 that measures 1 inch wide by 6 inches long by 0.3 inches thick is evaluated for strength by loading a 2 inch span of the section to failure in flexure to determine the modulus of rupture. The modulus of rupture (MOR) of the ceramic shell is calculated using the formula:
R = (3WI)/(2bd2) where:
R=
modulus of rupture in lbs/in2
W=
load in pounds at which the specimen
failed
I=
distance (span) in inches between the
center-lines of the lower bearing edges
b=
width of specimen in inches
d=
depth of specimen in inches
The modulus of rupture for the green shell is 1,018 PSI. The green shell is fired at 1850° F. for one hour. The modulus of rupture of the resulting fired shell mold is 1044 PSI.
The process of example 9 is repeated except that the slurry of example 8 is employed. The modulus of rupture for the green shell is 688 PSI. The green shell is fired at 1850° F. for one hour. The modulus of rupture of the resulting fired shell mold is 941 PSI.
The process of example 9 is repeated except that the slurry of example 8A is employed. The modulus of rupture for the green shell mold is 645 PSI. The shell mold is fired at 1850° F. for one hour. The modulus of rupture of the resulting fired mold is 694 PSI.
In another aspect of the invention, refractory slurry that includes rice hull ash is employed. Preferably, the rice hull ash is about 95+% amorphous silica, remainder carbon. This type of rice hull ash is available from Agrilectric Power, Inc., Houston, Tex. MegaPrime silica sol binder, available from Buntrock Industries, Inc. is employed. Use of rice hull ash with dry blends of refractory materials is illustrated in the following non-limiting examples:
The process of example 9 is repeated except that the refractory slurry used includes 1000 grams MegaPrime silica sol binder that has a pH of 10.5, a solids content of 40%, a titratable Na2O content of 0.33%, an average particle size of about 40 nm, a particle size distribution of about 6 nm to about 190 nm, and a standard deviation of particle size of about 20 nm, and the dry blend is 1430 grams of fused Silica 200 ceramic filler. The MOR of the green shell is 621 PSI.
The process of example 9 is repeated except that the refractory slurry used includes 1000 grams of the MegaPrime silica sol binder of example 12, and the dry blend is 1430 grams of fused Silica 200 ceramic filler, and 200 grams of rice hull ash. The MOR of the green shell is 804 PSI.
The process of example 9 is repeated except that the refractory slurry used includes 1000 grams MegaPrime silica sol binder of example 12, and the dry blend is 1430 grams fused Silica 200, 200 grams of rice hull ash, and 16 grams of 731 ED ⅛″ milled E-glass fiber. The MOR of the green shell mold is 833 PSI.
The process of example 9 is repeated except that the refractory slurry used includes 1000 grams of the MegaPrime silica sol binder of example 12, the dry blend is 1430 grams fused Silica 200, 100 grams of rice hull ash, and 16 grams of 731 ED ⅛″ milled E-glass fiber, and 4 grams Chop Vantage 8610 chopped ⅛″ E-glass fiber. The MOR of the green shell is 1161 PSI.
The process of example 9 is repeated except that the refractory slurry used includes 1000 grams Megasol® silica sol binder that has a pH of 9.5, a solids content of 45% and a titratable Na2O content of 0.2%, and the dry blend is 1300 grams of fused Silica 200 and 100 grams rice hull ash. The MOR of the green shell is 831 PSI.
The process of example 9 is repeated except that the refractory slurry used includes 875 grams of the MegaPrime sol binder of example 12, and the dry blend is 1485 grams fused Silica 120, 100 grams rice hull ash and 100 grams of polyethylene fiber that has a length of 1 mm and a denier of 1.8.
The process of example 9 is repeated except that the refractory slurry used includes 1000 grams MegaPrime silica sol binder that has a pH of 10.5, a solids content of 40%, a titratable Na2O content of 0.33%, an average particle size of about 40 nm, a particle size distribution of about 6 nm to about 190 nm, and a standard deviation of particle size of about 20 nm, and the dry blend of 1430 grams of fused Silica 200 ceramic filler and 100 grams rice hull ash.
The process of example 9 is repeated except that the refractory slurry used includes 1000 grams MegaPrime silica sol binder that has a pH of 10.5, a solids content of 40%, a titratable Na2O content of 0.33%, an average particle size of about 40 nm, a particle size distribution of about 6 nm to about 190 nm, and a standard deviation of particle size of about 20 nm, and the dry blend is 1430 grams of ceramic filler that includes 50% 325 mesh fused silica, 25% 120 mesh fused silica, and 25% 50 mesh fused silica.
The process of example 19 is repeated except that 100 grams of rice hull ash also is included in the dry blend used to prepare the refractory slurry.
The process of example 9 is repeated except that the refractory slurry used includes 1000 grams Megasol® silica sol binder that has a solids content of 45%, a pH of 9.5 and a titratable Na2O content of 0.2%, an average particle size of about 40 nm, a particle size distribution of about 6 nm to about 190 nm, and a standard deviation of particle size of about 20 nm, and the dry blend is a mixture of 100 grams ceramic fiber and 1500 grams ceramic filler. The ceramic fiber is Wollastonite One fiber. The ceramic filler includes 700 gram fused silica 120, 700 gram fused silica 200, 100 gram Mullite 100 Mesh. The MOR is 910 PSI.
The process of example 21 is repeated except that 100 grams of rice hull ash also is included in the dry blend used to prepare the refractory slurry.
This example illustrates manufacture of ceramic shell molds without the use of stucco.
An 8 inch by ⅞ inch by ⅜ inch wax bar preform 1 as shown in
Wax preform 1 is dipped into the refractory slurry for 8 seconds, removed, and allowed to drain for 10 seconds to form a first coat. The coated wax preform is dried for 30 minutes at 75° F., and then again dipped into the refractory slurry for 8 seconds to form a second coat.
Wax preform 1 having two coats then is dipped into the refractory slurry for eight seconds and drained for ten seconds. The coated preform then is dried for 30 minutes at 75° F. This cycle of dipping, draining and drying is repeated to provide a total of five additional coats.
After application of each coat or layer, portions of vertical sides 5 and lateral sides 1B of preform 1 are scraped to remove the coats to produce a ceramic shell mold 10 as shown in
The procedure of example 23 is repeated except that the dry blend includes 213 grams of E-glass fiber.
The procedure of example 23 is repeated except that the dry blend includes 100 grams of rice hull ash.
The procedure of example 24 is repeated except that the dry blend includes 100 grams rice hull ash.
In Examples 27–32 ceramic shells are formed by applying a first slurry to form a coat which does not have fibers onto an expendable wax preform. Subsequent coat(s), each of which are formed by admixing a dry blend that includes fibers and filler with colloidal sol, then are applied to the preform to produce a ceramic coated preform.
The wax preform employed is in the shape of an equilateral, triangular bar that measures 1.25 inches per side, 8 inches long, and has a radius of curvature of 0.070 inches on each corner. The triangular wax preform is available from Buntrock Industries, Inc. Prior to use, the wax preform typically is treated by cleaning it with a solvent such as trichloroethane and alcohol (about a 50:50 blend), Freon, acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, water based detergent solution or a water emulsion containing d-limonene. An especially good method of preparing the wax preform is to treat it with a colloidal alumina suspension as found in Pattern Wetting Solution from Buntrock Industries, Inc.
A shell is prepared by dipping the treated, triangular wax preform into a first slurry, stuccoing, drying and dipping into a second slurry, stuccoing and drying. Application of the second slurry, stuccoing, and drying is repeated until achieving a shell of desired thickness. The wax preform then is melted out to produce a green ceramic shell. The thicknesses of the center and of the corners of the shell are measured and compared to assess uniformity. Measurements show that the thickness of each of the corners of the shell is increased and that the uniformity of the shell is significantly improved by utilizing slurries produced from dry blends which include fibers. The use of these slurries also achieves superior material utilization and minimizes crack formation at high stress points such as the corners of the shell.
This example shows use of a first coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers with a colloidal silica sol, and a second slurry formed by mixing a blend of a ceramic fillers and nylon fiber with a colloidal silica sol.
A first slurry is formed by mixing 75 parts of a dry blend of two ceramic fillers with 25 parts Nyacol 830 colloidal silica sol (available from Eka Chemical) that is diluted with water to a 25% silica concentration. Nyacol 830 has 30 wt. % silica particles of an average diameter of 10 nm. The pH of the slurry is 10.5 and has a viscosity at 25° C. of 8 cps. The density of the sol is 10 LBS/gal., and has a Na2O content of 0.55 wt. %. The dry blend includes 20 parts fused silica 200f and 80 parts zircon 325 mesh. The viscosity of the slurry is adjusted to 20 seconds on a #5 Zahn cup by addition of water.
The second slurry is prepared by mixing 825 parts BI-2010 and 550 parts TMM-30. BI-2010 from Buntrock Industries, Inc. is a dry blend that includes fused silica and rice hull ash together with nylon fiber. TMM-30 is a 30% colloidal silica sol available from Buntrock Industries, Inc. The backup coat slurry is diluted with water to a viscosity of 17 seconds on a #5 Zahn cup.
A triangular wax preform, treated as described above, is dipped into the first slurry, stuccoed with 115 AFS zircon sand, and air dried at room temperature for 2 hr. to form a preform. The preform is then dipped into the second slurry, stuccoed with −30+50 mesh fused silica (available from CE Minerals, Inc.), and air dried at room temperature for 4 hr. This step is repeated two additional times to produce a total of three stuccoed coats of the second slurry. The resulting preform is seal coated by dipping it once into the second slurry and air drying at room temperature for 8 hr.
The preform is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to yield a green shell. Shell thickness and uniformity are measured. The average shell thickness of the green shell was 0.368 inches on centers and 0.316 inches on corners for uniformity of 85.9%.
This example shows use of a first slurry formed by mixing a ceramic filler with a colloidal silica sol, and a second slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers and nylon fiber with a colloidal silica sol.
The method of example 27 is followed except that 65 parts fused silica is substituted for the 75 parts of the dry blend of ceramic fillers and then mixed with the 25 parts Nyacol 830 in the first slurry.
This example shows use of first slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers with a colloidal silica sol, and a second slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers and nylon fiber with a colloidal silica sol modified by latex.
The procedure of example 27 is followed except that five coats of the second slurry are applied. Each coat formed by using the second slurry includes 15 parts of the BI-2010 dry blend employed in example 27, and 10 parts of TMM-30 silica sol that is modified by addition of 6 wt. % QDA latex polymer based on the weight of the TMM-30 sol. QDA latex polymer is available from Buntrock Industries, Inc. The second slurry has a viscosity of 15–16 seconds on a #5 Zahn cup.
The resulting preform is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to form a green shell. Shell thickness and uniformity are measured. Average shell build on centers is 0.404 inches and 0.311 inches on corners for a uniformity of 77.0%.
This example shows use of a first slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers with a colloidal silica sol, and a second slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers and polypropylene fiber with a colloidal silica sol.
The procedure of example 27 is used except that the second slurry is formed by substituting Gray Matter from Ondeo Nalco for the BI-2010 dry blend. Gray Matter is a dry blend of fused silica, fumed silica and polypropylene fibers which have an average length of 3.2 mm. The viscosity of the second slurry is 15–16 seconds on a #5 Zahn cup. The coated preform is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to form a green shell. The average shell thickness on centers is 0.374 inches and 0.286 inches on corners for uniformity of 76.5%.
This example shows use of a first slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers with a colloidal silica sol, and a second slurry formed by mixing a blend of a plurality of ceramic fillers and polypropylene fiber with a colloidal silica sol.
The first slurry is prepared by mixing 35 parts of a first dry blend of ceramic fillers with 10 parts Nyacol 1430 colloidal silica sol from Eka Chemical. The first dry blend of ceramic fillers includes 75 parts zircon (−325 mesh), and 25 parts fused silica 200f. The viscosity of the first slurry is adjusted with water to 24 seconds on a #5 Zahn cup.
A second slurry is prepared by mixing 24 parts of a second dry blend with 10 parts Nyacol 830 colloidal silica sol. The second dry blend includes 1 wt. % of 3.3 mm length polypropylene fibers, 60 wt. % fused silica 120f, 35% fused silica 200f and 4 wt. % fumed silica (available from CE Minerals, Inc.), all amounts based on total weight of the second dry blend. The second slurry is diluted with water to achieve a silica concentration of 25% and a viscosity of 16 seconds on a #5 Zahn cup. Shells are prepared as in example 27.
This example shows use of a first slurry formed from a single ceramic filler and a colloidal silica sol, and a second slurry formed from a blend of ceramic fillers and nylon fiber with a colloidal silica sol.
The first slurry is prepared using 80 wt. % −200 mesh zircon flour (Continental Minerals) and 20 wt. % Nyacol 830. A wax preform prepared as in example 27 is dipped into the first slurry, stuccoed with 115 AFS zircon sand (Continental minerals), and air dried. A second slurry is prepared from 10 parts TMM30 and 15 parts BI 2010 dry blend. The coated preform is dipped into the second slurry, stuccoed with SS30 fused silica (available from Buntrock Industries, Inc) and air dried to build the preform. This step is repeated four additional times to produce a preform that has five coats of the second slurry.
The resulting stuccoed preform is seal coated by dipping it once into the second slurry. The stuccoed preform is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to form a green shell. Average shell build on centers is 0.528 inches and 0.482 inches on corners for uniformity of 91.3%.
This example shows use of a first slurry formed from a single ceramic filler and a colloidal silica sol, and a second slurry formed from a blend of ceramic fillers and nylon fiber with a colloidal silica sol modified with latex.
The procedure of example 31 is followed except that TMM-30 silica sol that is modified by addition of 6 wt. % QDA latex polymer is substituted for the TMM-30 silica sol.
This example shows use of a first slurry formed from a single ceramic filler with a colloidal silica sol, and a second slurry formed from a blend of ceramic fillers and nylon fiber with a colloidal silica sol.
The first slurry is prepared by mixing 78 parts −325 mesh zircon flour (available from Continental Minerals) and 20 parts TMM30 silica sol to achieve a viscosity of 22 seconds on a #5 Zahn cup. The second slurry is prepared from 150 parts BI 2010 and 100 parts TMM30. The second slurry has a viscosity of 15 seconds on a #5 Zahn cup.
A triangular wax preform as in example 27 is dipped into the first slurry, stuccoed with 110 to 125 AFS zircon sand and air dried to produce a stuccoed preform. The stuccoed preform is again dipped into the first slurry, stuccoed with −50+100 fused silica (CE Minerals) and air dried. The resulting stuccoed preform is dipped into the second slurry, stuccoed with SS-30 fused silica (Buntrock Industries, Inc.), and air dried. This step is repeated two additional times to produce a preform that has a total of three stuccoed coats of the second slurry. The preform is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to form a green shell. Shell build is 0.372 inches on centers and 0.307 inches on corners for uniformity of 82.5%.
Examples 33 and 34 are comparative examples which show use of first and second slurries which include ceramic filler but without fiber.
This example shows use of a first slurry formed by mixing a single ceramic filler with a colloidal silica sol, and a second slurry formed by mixing a blend of a plurality of ceramic fillers and colloidal silica sol.
Shell specimens are prepared as in example 31, except that the second slurry is formed by mixing a dry blend of 490 parts 120f fused silica and 1122 parts 200f fused silica (CE Minerals) with 790 parts Nyacol 830 and 98 parts water, and also that the stucco applied to the second slurry is −30+50 fused silica (CE Minerals). The preform is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to form a green shell. Average shell build on centers was 0.418 inches and 0.327 on corners for a uniformity of 78.2%.
This example shows use of a first slurry formed by mixing a single ceramic filler and a colloidal silica sol, and a second slurry formed by mixing a single ceramic filler and colloidal silica sol.
Shell specimens are prepared as in example 31, except that the second slurry is prepared from 70 parts fused silica 200f (CE Minerals) and 30 parts Nyacol 830, and that each of the second slurry coats is stuccoed with −30+50 fused silica (CE Minerals). A total of four coats of the second slurry with stuccoing are applied, as well as a seal coat. The seal coat employs the second slurry. The preform is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to form a green shell. Shell build is 0.285 on centers and 0.229 on corners for a uniformity of 80.5%.
Examples 35–41 show the versatility of slurries formed from dry fiber blends in shell construction. In examples 35–37, dry blends 1 to 4 and Slurries AA to DD are employed. The designation of slurries AA to DD is adopted to demonstrate that numerous slurries employing different combinations of dry blends with colloidal sols are feasible. Further, the various slurries may be employed in either a prime coat or a back up coat capacity as will be understood from the examples below.
Dry blend No. 1 is prepared by mixing 0.5 wt. % Wex nylon fibers which have an average length of 0.5 mm., 50 wt. % fused silica 200f (available from CE Minerals), and 49.5 wt. % zircon 325 mesh (available from Continental Minerals, Inc.), all amounts based on the total weight of the blend. Slurry AA is formed by mixing 75 parts dry blend No. 1 with 30 parts Nyacol 830 where the Nyacol 830 is diluted with water to achieve a silica concentration of 25%. The viscosity of slurry AA is adjusted with water to 22 seconds on a #5 Zahn cup.
Dry blend No. 2 is prepared by mixing a blend of 50 wt. % fused silica 200f (available from CE Minerals), and 50 wt. % zircon 325 mesh (available from Continental Minerals, Inc.), all amounts based on the total weight of the blend. Slurry BB is prepared in the same manner as described above with Slurry AA except that dry blend 2 is substituted for dry blend 1. The viscosity of Slurry BB is adjusted to 22 seconds on a number #5 Zahn cup by addition of water.
Dry blend No. 3 is BI-2010 (available from Buntrock Industries, Inc.). Slurry CC is prepared using 15 parts of BI-2010 and 10 parts TMM-30 colloidal silica binder. The viscosity of slurry CC is adjusted to 16 seconds on a #5 Zahn cup by addition of water.
Dry blend No. 4 is prepared by mixing 1 wt. % Wex nylon fiber that measures 1.6 mm long and 99 wt. % Mulgrain M60 200ICC (available from CE Minerals, Inc.), all amounts based on the total weight of the blend. Slurry DD is made with 40 parts Megasol® (available from Buntrock Industries) and 60 parts dry blend No. 4. Slurry DD is adjusted to a viscosity of 14 seconds on a #5 Zahn cup by addition of water.
This example shows use of a prime coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers and nylon fiber with colloidal silica sol, as well as a backup coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers and nylon fiber with colloidal silica sol.
A triangular wax preform as in example 31 is dipped into a Pattern Wetting Solution (Buntrock Industries) that contains colloidal alumina and wetting agent. The resulting treated preform is dipped once into slurry AA, stuccoed with zircon sand and air dried to form a prime coated, stuccoed preform. The prime coated preform again is dipped into slurry AA, stuccoed with SS-30 fused silica to produce a stuccoed, backup coated preform, and then air dried. This step is repeated three times to produce a total of four stuccoed, backup coats. The stuccoed preform is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to form a green shell.
This example shows use of a first prime coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers with colloidal silica sol, a second prime coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers and nylon fiber with colloidal silica sol, and a backup coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of a single ceramic filler and nylon fiber with colloidal silica sol.
A wax preform is prepared as in example 35, coated with the Pattern Wetting Solution and air dried. The wax preform is dipped into Slurry BB, and stuccoed with zircon sand and air dried to form a first prime coat, stuccoed preform. The prime coat, stuccoed preform then is dipped into Slurry CC, stuccoed with −50+100 fused silica and air dried to produce a bilayer, prime coat, stuccoed preform. The bilayer, stuccoed preform is dipped into slurry DD, and stuccoed with Mulgrain M47 22S (available from CE Minerals, Inc.) and air dried to produce a stuccoed, backup coated preform. This step is repeated twice to produce a preform that has a total of three backup, stuccoed coats. The preform is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to form a green shell.
This example shows use of a first prime coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers with colloidal silica sol, a second prime coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic filler and ceramic fiber with colloidal silica sol, and a backup coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic filler and ceramic fiber with colloidal silica sol.
The process of example 36 is followed except that Wollastonite ceramic fiber is substituted for nylon in each of blends 3 and 4 for use in slurry CC applied as a second prime coat and slurry DD applied as a backup coat.
This example shows use of a prime coat formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers with colloidal silica sol and a backup coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of a ceramic fillers and nylon fiber with colloidal silica sol.
A triangular wax preform as in example 35 is treated with Pattern Wetting Solution and air dried as in example 35. The preform is dipped into slurry BB, stuccoed with Mulgrain M47 105AFS (available from CE Minerals, Inc.) and air dried to produce a stuccoed, prime coated preform. The stuccoed, prime coated preform is dipped into slurry CC, stuccoed with Mulgrain M47 22S and air dried to produce a stuccoed backup coated preform. This step is repeated three times to produce a preform that has four stuccoed, backup coats. The preform is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to form a green shell.
This example shows use of a first prime coat formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers with colloidal silica sol, a second prime coat formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers with colloidal silica sol having a latex modifier, and a backup slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers with colloidal silica sol having a latex modifier. This example shows the difference in shell construction and breaking load when slurries are employed which do not include fiber.
A wax bar measuring 8 inches long by 1.25 inches wide by 0.25 inches thick is dipped in Pattern Wetting Solution from Buntrock Industries. The resultant, treated wax bar is air dried to produce a coated bar bearing a hydrophilic film of dried colloidal alumina. The bar then is dipped into a first prime coat slurry formed by mixing 2000 gms of a blend that includes 75 wt. % zircon 200 and 25 wt. % fused silica 120 f with 625 grams Nyacol 830. The viscosity of this first prime coat slurry is 20 seconds on a #4 Zahn cup. The bar bearing the first prime coat then is air-dried.
The air dried bar is wetted with TMM-30 silica sol diluted with water to 15% concentration prior to application of second prime coat slurry. The resulting, pre-wetted bar, without drying, is dipped into a second slurry that is formed by mixing a 50:50 blend of 120 f fused silica and 200 f fused silica with TMM-30 aqueous silica sol that has been modified to include 10 wt. % latex polymer, based on the TMM-30 sol. The second prime coat slurry has a viscosity of 15 seconds on a BI#5 cup. The BI#5 cup is available from Buntrock Industries.
The second prime coat is stuccoed with Zircon sand to form a stuccoed, prime coated bar and air dried. The dried, stuccoed, prime coated bar again is dipped into the second slurry and then stuccoed with −30+50 fused silica (CE Minerals) and air dried to produce a stuccoed backup coated bar. This step is repeated three times to produce a bar that bears four stuccoed backup coats. A seal coat is applied by dipping the resulting bar into the second slurry and then air-drying without applying stucco.
Using this procedure, two stuccoed bars are produced. Each bar is air dried, and then heated to 200° F. to melt out the wax to produce green ceramic shells. The shell thickness on the first bar is 0.229″, and the shell thickness on the second bar is 0.244″. Each shell measures 6.5 inches long and 1.25 inches wide. The first shell is evaluated for dry green breaking load and MOR as described above. The first shell has a dry green breaking load of 16.23 LB, and a dry green MOR of 733 PSI.
The second shell is soaked for two minutes in boiling water and then removed. This second shell, while hot and moist, is tested using the procedures described above to obtain breaking load and MOR. The breaking load for the hot, moist second shell is 4.74 LB, and its MOR is 189 PSI.
This example shows use of a first prime coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of a ceramic fillers with colloidal silica sol, a second prime coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers and polypropylene fiber with a colloidal silica sol having a latex modifier, and a backup coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers and polypropylene fiber with a colloidal silica sol having a latex modifier.
The procedure of example 38 is followed except that Gray Matter dry blend from Ondeo Nalco is substituted for the 50:50 blend of 120 f fused silica and 200 f fused silica used to form the second slurry. The second slurry has a viscosity of 15 seconds on a BI#5 cup. Gray Matter dry blend includes fused silica, fumed silica, and polypropylene fiber. A first shell of 0.263″ thickness and a second shell of 0.260″ thickness are produced. The first shell has a dry green breaking load of 13.60 LB and a dry green MOR of 478 PSI. The second shell, after having been soaked in boiling water for two minutes, is tested as above to determine breaking load and MOR. The shell has a hot, moist breaking load of 6.64 LB and a hot, moist MOR of 239 PSI.
This example shows use of a first prime coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers with colloidal silica sol, a second prime coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers and nylon fiber with a colloidal silica sol, and a backup coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers and nylon fiber with a colloidal silica sol.
The procedure of example 38 is followed except that in the second slurry, BI-2010 dry blend available from Buntrock Industries is substituted for the 50:50 blend of 120 f fused silica and 200 f fused silica and TMM-30 silica sol is substituted for the TMM-30 silica sol modified by latex. The second slurry has a viscosity of 15 seconds on a BI#5 cup. A first shell of 0.332″ thickness and a second shell of 0.370″ thickness are produced. The first shell has a dry green breaking load of 20.61 LB and a dry green MOR of 443 PSI. The second shell, after having been soaked in boiling water for two minutes, has a hot, moist breaking load of 13.24 LB and a hot, moist MOR of 230 PSI.
This example shows use of a first prime coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers with colloidal silica sol, a second prime coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers and nylon fiber with a colloidal silica sol, and a backup coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic filler and polypropylene fiber with a colloidal silica sol.
Following the procedure of example 38, a first prime coat is applied to the wax bar, air-dried, and then wetted with the diluted TMM-30 silica sol. Before drying, a second prime coat is applied to the bar by dipping it into the second slurry used in example 40 and air dried. The resulting prime coated bar then is dipped into a backup coat slurry formed from Gray Matter dry blend and TMM-30 colloidal silica sol. The backup coat slurry has a viscosity of 15 seconds on a BI#5 cup. The backup coated bar is then stuccoed with −30+50 fused silica (CE Minerals) and air dried to produce a stuccoed, backup coated bar. This step is repeated three times to produce a bar that bears four stuccoed backup coats. A final seal coat is applied by dipping the bar into the backup coat slurry and air dried without applying stucco.
Using this procedure, two stuccoed bars are produced. Each bar is air dried, and then de-waxed as Example 38. The shell thickness on the first bar is 0.287″, and the shell thickness on the second bar is 0.288″. The first shell has a dry green breaking load of 18.68 lb., and a dry green MOR of 547 PSI. The second shell, after having been soaked in boiling water for two minutes, has a hot, moist breaking load of 8.91 lb., and a hot moist MOR of 261. PSI.
This example shows use of prime coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic filler and ceramic fiber with colloidal silica sol and a backup coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic filler and ceramic fiber with a colloidal silica sol.
A triangular wax preform as in example 35 is dipped once into a slurry that is formed by mixing a 20 parts of a blend of 98% fused silica ceramic filler and 2% Wollastonite ceramic fiber with 12 parts TMM-30 sol. The resulting coated preform is stuccoed with zircon sand and air dried to form a prime coated, stuccoed preform. The prime coated preform again is dipped into the slurry, stuccoed with SS-30 fused silica to produce a stuccoed, backup coated preform, and then air dried. This step is repeated three times to produce a total of four stuccoed, backup coats. The stuccoed preform then is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to form a green shell.
This example shows use of a prime coat formed by mixing a blend of a ceramic filler and ceramic fibers with colloidal silica sol and a backup coat formed by mixing a blend of a ceramic filler and a plurality of ceramic fibers with colloidal silica sol.
A triangular wax preform as in example 35 is dipped once into a slurry that is formed by mixing 24 parts of a blend formed of 97 parts of fused silica ceramic filler and 3 parts of a mixture formed of 50 parts Kaowool ceramic fiber and 50 parts Saffil ceramic fiber, with 10 parts Nyacol 830 silica sol. The resulting coated preform is stuccoed with zircon sand and air dried to form a prime coated, stuccoed preform. The prime coated preform again is dipped into the slurry, stuccoed with SS-30 fused silica to produce a stuccoed, backup coated preform, and then air dried. This step is repeated three times to produce a total of four stuccoed, backup coats. The stuccoed preform then is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to form a green shell.
This example shows use of a prime coat formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers and polypropylene fiber with colloidal silica sol and a backup coat formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers and polypropylene fiber with colloidal silica sol.
A triangular wax preform as in example 35 is dipped once into a slurry that is formed by mixing 28 parts of a blend formed of 50 parts of Zircon ceramic filler and 50 parts of a mixture formed of 96 parts fused silica and 4 parts polypropylene fiber, with 10 parts Nalcoag 1130 silica sol. The resulting coated preform is stuccoed with zircon sand and air dried to form a prime coated, stuccoed preform. The prime coated preform again is dipped into the slurry, stuccoed with SS-30 fused silica to produce a stuccoed, backup coated preform, and then air dried. This step is repeated three times to produce a total of four stuccoed, backup coats. The stuccoed preform then is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to form a green shell.
This example shows use of a prime coat formed by mixing a blend of a ceramic filler, ceramic fiber and nylon fiber with silica sol and a backup coat formed by mixing a blend of a ceramic filler, ceramic fiber and nylon fiber with silica sol.
A triangular wax preform as in example 35 is dipped once into a slurry that is formed by mixing 25 parts of a blend formed of 98 parts of fused silica ceramic filler and 2 parts of a mixture formed of 4 parts Wollastonite ceramic fiber and 1 part nylon fiber, with 10 parts TMM-30 sol. The resulting coated preform is stuccoed with zircon sand and air dried to form a prime coated, stuccoed preform. The prime coated preform again is dipped into the slurry, stuccoed with SS-30 fused silica to produce a stuccoed, backup coated preform, and then air dried. This step is repeated three times to produce a total of four stucco, backup coats. The stuccoed preform then is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to form a green shell.
This example shows use of a prime coat formed of a blend of ceramic fillers and ceramic fiber and a backup coat formed of a blend of ceramic fillers and ceramic fiber.
A triangular wax preform as in example 35 is dipped once into a slurry that is formed by mixing 30 parts of a blend formed of a mixture of 50 parts zircon ceramic filler, 45 parts fused silica ceramic filler and 5 parts Wollastonite ceramic fiber, with 10 parts Megasol®. The resulting coated preform is stuccoed with zircon sand and air dried to form a prime coated, stuccoed preform. The prime coated preform again is dipped into the slurry, stuccoed with SS-30 fused silica to produce a stuccoed, backup coated preform, and then air dried. This step is repeated three times to produce a total of four stucco, backup coats. The stuccoed preform then is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to form a green shell.
This example shows use of a prime coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers and ceramic fibers with colloidal silica sol and a backup coat formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers and of ceramic fibers with colloidal silica sol.
A triangular wax preform as in example 35 is dipped once into a slurry that is formed by mixing 29 parts of a blend formed of a mixture of 48 parts fused silica ceramic filler and 48 parts Mulgrain ceramic filler with 4 parts of a mixture of 30 parts Kaowool ceramic fiber and 70 parts Mineral wool ceramic fiber, with 10 parts TMM-30 sol. The resulting coated preform is stuccoed with zircon sand and air dried to form a prime coated, stuccoed preform. The prime coated preform again is dipped into the slurry, stuccoed with SS-30 fused silica to produce a stuccoed, backup coated preform, and then air dried. This step is repeated three times to produce a total of four stuccoed, backup coats. The stuccoed preform then is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to form a green shell.
This example shows use of a prime coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers with polypropylene fiber with colloidal silica sol and a backup coat by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers with polypropylene fiber with colloidal silica sol.
A triangular wax preform as in example 35 is dipped once into slurry that is formed by mixing 32 parts of a blend of a mixture of 33 parts fused silica ceramic filler and 33 parts Mulgrain ceramic filler, and 34 parts of a mixture of 90 parts Kyanite ceramic filler and 10 parts polypropylene fiber, with 10 parts Megasol®. The resulting coated preform is stuccoed with zircon sand and air dried to form a prime coated, stuccoed preform. The prime coated preform again is dipped into the slurry, stuccoed with SS-30 fused silica to produce a stuccoed, backup coated preform, and then air dried. This step is repeated three times to produce a total of four stucco, backup coats. The stuccoed preform then is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to form a green shell.
This example shows use of a prime coat slurry formed by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers with nylon fiber with colloidal silica sol and a backup coat by mixing a blend of ceramic fillers and nylon fiber with colloidal silica sol.
A triangular wax preform as in example 35 is dipped once into a slurry that is formed by mixing 35 parts of a blend formed of a mixture of 75 parts of Zircon ceramic filler and 20 parts tabular alumina ceramic filler, and 5 parts of a mixture of 2 parts Saffil ceramic fiber and 2 parts nylon fiber, with 10 parts TMM-30 sol. The resulting coated preform is stuccoed with zircon sand and air dried to form a prime coated, stuccoed preform. The prime coated preform again is dipped into the slurry, stuccoed with SS-30 fused silica to produce a stuccoed, backup coated preform, and then air dried. This step is repeated three times to produce a total of four stuccoed, backup coats. The stuccoed preform then is heated to 200° F. to remove the wax preform to form a green shell.
The description of the invention is merely exemplary in nature and, thus, variations that do not depart from the gist of the invention are intended to be within the scope of the invention. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Vandermeer, John, Buntrock, Kermit A, Branscomb, Thomas M, Davis, Arlen G
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 10179364, | Apr 12 2012 | REL, Inc. | Thermal isolation for casting articles |
| 10434568, | Apr 12 2012 | REL, INC | Thermal isolation spray for casting articles |
| 10610922, | Sep 08 2017 | GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGY LLC | Ceramic slurry compositions and methods of use thereof |
| 10953460, | Oct 10 2016 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Method of making investment casting mold |
| 11873218, | Mar 02 2018 | PÖRNER INGENIEURGESELLSCHAFT M B H | Sustainable silicates and methods for their extraction |
| 8087450, | Jan 29 2007 | Evonik Operations GmbH | Fumed metal oxides for investment casting |
| 8834622, | Jul 11 2011 | Investment casting | |
| 9180511, | Apr 12 2012 | REL, INC | Thermal isolation for casting articles |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 2806270, | |||
| 2829060, | |||
| 3396775, | |||
| 3455368, | |||
| 3654984, | |||
| 3679446, | |||
| 3748157, | |||
| 3751276, | |||
| 3878034, | |||
| 4196769, | Mar 20 1978 | Remet Corporation | Ceramic shell mold |
| 4352390, | Dec 04 1978 | Sherwood Refractories, Inc. | Precision silica cones for sand casting of steel and iron alloys |
| 4427611, | Feb 04 1980 | Mitsubishi Kasei Corporation | Process for preparing calcium silicate shaped product |
| 4531705, | Apr 22 1983 | Sinto Kogio, Ltd. | Composite and durable forming model with permeability |
| 4659679, | Jan 25 1985 | KEYSTONE SENSORS LLC | Insulative composition and method of making articles therefrom |
| 5198006, | Apr 07 1989 | Asahi Glass Company Ltd | Ceramic filter for a dust-containing gas and method for its production |
| 5535811, | Jan 28 1987 | REMET PIC, INC | Ceramic shell compositions for casting of reactive metals |
| 5617912, | Apr 14 1904 | Process for preparing and using a ceramic shell as a casting mold with reducing properties | |
| 5738819, | Jan 28 1987 | REMET PIC, INC | Method for making ceramic shell molds and cores |
| 5766686, | Mar 01 1996 | North American Refractories Co. | Spray insulating coating for refractory articles |
| 5944888, | Mar 01 1996 | North American Refractories Co. | Spray insulating coating for refractory articles |
| 5950702, | Apr 11 1997 | ASK CHEMICALS L P | Consumable pattern coating for lost foam castings |
| 6000457, | Jun 26 1998 | Buntrock Industries, Inc.; BUNTROCK INDUSTRIES | Investment casting mold and method of manufacture |
| 6450243, | Mar 17 2000 | Buntrock Industries, Inc | Investment casting |
| 6540013, | Jun 07 2001 | Ecolab USA Inc | Method of increasing the strength and solids level of investment casting shells |
| 6769475, | Mar 17 2000 | Buntrock Industries, Inc | Investment casting |
| 6770699, | Aug 27 2001 | Ecolab USA Inc | Investment casting binders for making molds having high green strength and low fired strength |
| DE4203904, | |||
| EP502580, | |||
| EP207864, | |||
| EP244133, | |||
| EP763392, | |||
| GB943488, | |||
| GB976617, | |||
| GB1005351, | |||
| GB1278473, | |||
| GB1300954, | |||
| GB1410634, | |||
| GB1575124, | |||
| GB2294232, | |||
| GB2350810, | |||
| JP1075139, | |||
| JP11156482, | |||
| JP2164778, | |||
| JP3150241, | |||
| JP48043779, | |||
| JP52095533, | |||
| JP54028293, | |||
| JP54134732, | |||
| JP55064945, | |||
| JP56017157, | |||
| JP57206548, | |||
| JP61202744, | |||
| JP6277795, | |||
| WO5009, | |||
| WO168291, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Mar 23 2005 | BRANSCOMB, THOMAS M | Buntrock Industries, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016448 | /0598 | |
| Mar 23 2005 | DAVIS, ARLEN G | Buntrock Industries, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016448 | /0598 | |
| Mar 25 2005 | BUNTROCK, KERMIT A | Buntrock Industries, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016448 | /0598 | |
| Mar 28 2005 | VANDERMEER, JOHN | Buntrock Industries, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016448 | /0598 | |
| Mar 31 2005 | Buntrock Industries, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Oct 29 2009 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
| May 30 2013 | M2552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity. |
| Sep 14 2017 | M2553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Yr, Small Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| May 23 2009 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Nov 23 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| May 23 2010 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| May 23 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| May 23 2013 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Nov 23 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| May 23 2014 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| May 23 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| May 23 2017 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Nov 23 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| May 23 2018 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| May 23 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |