A method, computer program product and data processing system for identifying non-externalized strings that are not hard-coded. In one embodiment, a method comprises the step of scanning a code, e.g., Java, line by line until a pair of string delimiters is identified. Once a pair of string delimiters is identified, the method further comprises the step of determining whether the string within the pair of string delimiters identified is a path name to a resource file, e.g., resource bundle. If the string is a path name to the resource file, then the string is a non-externalized string that is not hard-coded. If the string is not a path name to the resource file, then the string may be identified as a possible hard-coded string.
|
1. A method for identifying hard-coded strings that require conversion, the method comprising the computer-implemented steps of:
scanning programming code for a first pair of string delimiters that are used to delimit text strings;
determining whether a text string within said first pair of string delimiters is a path name to a resource file;
if said text string is not a path name to said resource file then flagging said string as a possible hard-coded string; and
wherein said text string is not flagged as a possible hard-coded string if said text string is a path name to said resource file.
8. A computer program product in a computer readable medium for identifying hard-coded string that require conversion, comprising:
programming operable for scanning programming code for a first pair of string delimiters that are used to delimit text strings;
programming operable for determining whether a text string within said first pair of string delimiters is a path name to a resource file;
programming operable for flagging said text string as possible hard-coded string if said string is not a path name to said resource file; and
wherein said text string is not flagged as a possible hard-coded string if said text string is a path name to said resource file.
15. A data processing system, comprising:
a processor; and
a memory unit for storing instructions of said processor;
an input mechanism;
an output mechanism;
a bus system for coupling the processor to the memory unit, input mechanism, and output mechanism;
means for scanning programming code for a first pair of string delimiters that are used to delimit text strings;
means for determining whether a text string within said first pair of string delimiters is a path name to a resource file;
means for flagging said string as a possible hard-coded string if said text string is not a path name to said resource file; and
means for not flagging said text string is not flagged as a possible hard-coded string if said text string is a path name to said resource file.
2. The method as recited in clam 1, wherein said programming code comprises platform-independent byte code.
5. The method as recited in clam 1, wherein said text string within said first pair of string delimiters is a path name to said resource file if said text string is in a dot delimited notation.
6. The method as recited in clam 1, wherein said programming code is scanned line by line until said first pair of string delimiters is identified.
7. The method as recited in clam 6, wherein if there is any more programming code to be scanned after said first pair of string delimiters is identified, then the method further comprises the step of:
continuing to scan said programming code for a second pair of delimiters.
9. The computer program product as recited in
10. The computer program product as recited in
11. The computer program product as recited in
12. The computer program product as recited in
13. The computer program product as recited in
14. The computer program product as recited in
programming operable for continuing to scan said programming code for a second pair of delimiters.
16. The data processing system as recited in
17. The data processing system as recited in
18. The data processing system as recited in
19. The data processing system as recited in
20. The data processing system as recited in
21. The data processing system as recited in
means for continuing to scan said programming code for a second pair of delimiters.
|
The present invention is related to the following U.S. patent applications which are incorporated herein by reference:
Ser. No. 09/697,448 entitled “Detection of Resource Exceptions” filed Oct. 26, 2000.
Ser. No. 09/697,445 entitled “Pre-Processing Code to Identify and Modify Format of Keys” filed Oct. 26, 2000.
The present invention relates to the field of internationalization, and more particularly to a scanning program that identifies non hard-coded text strings.
Internationalization is a process of enabling a program, e.g., Java™, to run internationally. That is, an internationalized program has the flexibility to run correctly in any country. An internationalized program must be able to read, write and manipulate localized text. Furthermore, an internationalized program must conform to local customs when displaying dates and times, formatting numbers and sorting strings.
Internationalization is becoming increasingly important with the explosive growth of the Internet and the World Wide Web where an ever increasing number of computer users are from various locales. A locale represents a geographic, cultural or political region. One of the problems with internationalization involves the use of text strings that may be hard-coded in the program, e.g., Java™. Hard-coded text strings refer to text that will not vary with the locale. That is, the text strings may appear in English even when the program is run on the French locale. Various object-oriented languages such as Java™ have developed tools to assist in developing internationalized programs and allowing text strings to appear in the language of the locale. A discussion of object-oriented programming languages and in particular Java is deemed appropriate.
In an object-oriented programming language such as Java™, a class is a collection of data and methods that operate on that data. The data and methods taken together describe the state and behavior of what is commonly referred to as an object. An object in essence includes data and code where the code manipulates the data. Hence a software application may be written using an object-oriented programming language such as Java™ whereby the program's functionality is implemented using objects.
Unlike many programming languages, Java™ is compiled into machine independent code commonly referred to as bytecodes instead of machine dependent code, i.e. executable code. Bytecodes are stored in a particular file format commonly referred to as a “class file” that includes bytecodes for methods of a class. In addition to the bytecodes for methods of a class, the class file includes a symbol file as well as other ancillary information.
A computer program embodied as Java™ bytecodes in one or more class files is platform independent. The computer program may be executed, unmodified, on any computer that is able to run an implementation of what is commonly referred to as a Java™ virtual machine. The Java™ virtual machine is not an actual hardware platform, but rather a low level software emulator that can be implemented on many different computer processor architectures and under many different operating systems. The Java™ virtual machine reads and interprets each bytecode so that the instructions may be executed by the native processor. Hence a Java™ bytecode is capable of functioning on any platform that has a Java™ virtual machine implementation available. However, bytecode interpretation detracts from processor performance since the microprocessor has to spend some of its processing time interpreting bytecode instructions. Compilers commonly referred to as “just in time (JIT)” were developed to improve the performance of Java virtual machines. A JIT compiler translates Java™ bytecodes into the processor's native machine code during runtime. The processor then executes the compiled native machine code.
As stated above Java™ has developed tools to assist in developing internationalized programs and allowing text strings to appear in the language of the locale. One such tool is the use of resource files commonly referred to in Java™ as resource bundles. A resource bundle class may be used for externalizing text strings, i.e. not hard-coding strings in the program. The resource bundle class represents a bundle of resources that may be looked up by name. The resources may include appropriate text strings for a given locale that are indexed by what are commonly referred to as keys. Keys are free formatted strings that appear in the program code as well as in the resource bundle thereby allowing the program to access the externalized string. By having resource bundles associated with particular locales, e.g., a resource file with resources associated with the US English locale, a resource file with resources associated with the French locale and so forth, appropriate text strings associated with the particular locale may be loaded at runtime.
However, software developers may still hard-code their strings into their application instead of externalizing them and loading them from the resource bundle. Various scanning programs have been developed which attempt to detect hard-coded strings. Unfortunately, these scanning programs simply detect as hard-coded strings all text enclosed within double quotes (“ ”) which are used as string delimiters in Java™ (as well as other programming languages). However, not all text enclosed within double quotes are hard-coded strings. The text enclosed within the double quotes may be a path name to a resource file, e.g., resource bundle.
It would therefore be desirable to develop a scanning program that identifies non-externalized strings, e.g., path names to resource files, that are not hard-coded but that are enclosed within string delimiters.
The problems outlined above may at least in part be solved in some embodiments by a scanning program that scans a code, e.g., Java™, line by line until a pair of string delimiters is identified. Once a pair of string delimiters is identified, the scanning program determines whether the string within the pair of string delimiters identified is a path name to a resource file, e.g., resource bundle. If the string is a path name to the resource file, then the string is not a hard-coded string. If the string is not a path name to the resource file, then the string may be identified as a possible hard-coded string.
In one embodiment, a method for identifying non-externalized strings that are not hard-coded comprises the step of scanning a code for a pair of string delimiters. The method further comprises the step of determining whether the string within the pair of string delimiters identified is a path name to a resource file. If the string is a path name to the resource file, then the string is a non-externalized string that is not hard-coded. If the string is not a path name to the resource file, then the string may be identified as a possible hard-coded string.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention.
A better understanding of the present invention can be obtained when the following detailed description is considered in conjunction with the following drawings, in which:
The present invention comprises a method, computer program product and data processing system for identifying non-externalized strings that are not hard-coded. In one embodiment of the present invention a scanning program scans a code, e.g., Java™, line by line until a pair of string delimiters is identified. Once a pair of string delimiters is identified, the scanning program determines whether the string within the pair of string delimiters identified is a path name to a resource file, e.g., resource bundle. If the string is a path name to the resource file, then the string is a non-externalized string that is not hard-coded. If the string is not a path name to the resource file, then the string may be identified as a possible hard-coded string. It is noted that the even though the following discusses the present invention in conjunction with a Java™ programming environment the present invention may be implemented in any type of programming environment where the programming language has the capability of externalizing text strings in resource files.
FIG. 1—Computer System
Preferred implementations of the invention include implementations as a computer system programmed to execute the method or methods described herein, and as a computer program product. According to the computer system implementations, sets of instructions for executing the method or methods are resident in the random access memory 14 of one or more computer systems configured generally as described above. Until required by the computer system, the set of instructions may be stored as a computer program product in another computer memory, for example, in disk drive 20 (which may include a removable memory such as an optical disk or floppy disk for eventual use in disk drive 20). Furthermore, the computer program product can also be stored at another computer and transmitted when desired to the user's work station by a network or by an external network such as the Internet. One skilled in the art would appreciate that the physical storage of the sets of instructions physically changes the medium upon which it is stored so that the medium carries computer readable information. The change may be electrical, magnetic, chemical or some other physical change.
FIG. 2—Method for Identifying Non-Externalized Strings that are not Hard-Coded
In step 210, a scanning program scans the code of an application program 42 line by line for string delimiters until the scanning program identifies a pair of string delimiters. String delimiters refers to the quotes (“ ”) that mark the beginning and end of a text string. For example, in the classic Hello World program written in Java™ as shown below
A determination is then made in step 220 as to whether the scanning program has identified a pair of string delimiters that mark the beginning and end of a text string. If the scanning program has not identified a pair of string delimiters, then method 200 is terminated at step 230. If the scanning program has identified a pair of string delimiters, the scanning program determines whether the string within the string delimiters is a path name to the resource file in step 240. As stated in the Background Information section, a resource file is commonly referred to as a resource bundle in Java™. It is further noted that a path name to a resource file, e.g., resource bundle, is a non-externalized string that is not hard-coded but is enclosed within double quotes within a program, e.g., Java™. For example, in the Java™ code shown below
rbCal=ResourceLoader.getBundle(“com.tivoli.uif.Resources.CalendarResources”);
setTitle(ResourceLoader.getString(rbCal, “Holiday Title”);
the string “com.tivoli.uif.Resources.CalendarResources” is a path name to a resource bundle. Path names to resource bundles are commonly referred to as uniform resource locator (URL). URL's are commonly identified by their dotted signature. It is noted that rbCal is a resource bundle where the method ResourceLoader retrieves calender resources from the URL “com.tivoli.uif.Resources.CalendarResources.” It is further noted that the second line of the above written Java™ code sets the title to the window to an externalized string “Holiday Title” located in the resource bundle, rbCal. That is, the method ResourceLoader will retrieve the proper string associated with the language of the locale. For example, if the locale is an American locale, then the holiday title on the window may appear as “Christmas.” If the locale is a Spanish locale, then the holiday title on the window may appear as “Navidad.”
Referring to the above example of Java™ code, the scanning program may identify the string delimiters that mark the beginning and end of the text string “com.tivoli.uif.Resources.CalendarResources” in step 220. In step 240, a determination is made by the scanning program as to whether the string within the string delimiters identified in step 220 is a non-externalized string that is not hard-coded. If the scanning program determines that the string within the string delimiter is a non-externalized string that is not hard-coded, then the scanning program will not flag the string as a possible hard-coded string in step 250. As stated above, the scanning program will identify the string within the string delimiters as a non-externalized string that is not hard-coded if the string is a URL identified from its dotted signature, e.g., “com.tivoli.uif.Resources.CalendarResources.” A determination is then made in step 260 as to whether there is any more code to scan by the scanning program. If there is no more code to scan by the scanning program, then method 200 is terminated at step 230. If there is more code to scan by the scanning program, then method 200 proceeds to scan the remaining code for string delimiters in step 210. It is noted for clarity that if the scanning program has identified a pair of string delimiters in a particular line of code in step 220 and there is more code within that particular line, then the scanning program may continue to scan the remainder of that particular line of code and the remaining line(s) of code until the scanning program identifies a pair of string delimiters.
If the scanning program determines in step 240 that the string within the string delimiter is not a path name to a resource file, e.g., resource bundle, then the scanning program identifies, i.e. flags, the string as a possible hard-coded string in step 270. For example, in the second line of code of the above example, the string “Holiday Title” may not be identified as a path name in step 240 because “Holiday Title” does not exhibit a dotted signature. Therefore, the string “Holiday Title” may be identified as a possible hard-coded string in step 270. A determination is then made in step 260 as to whether there is any more code to scan by the scanning program. If there is no more code to scan by the scanning program, then method 200 is terminated at step 230. If there is more code to scan by the scanning program, then method 200 proceeds to scan the remaining code for string delimiters in step 210. It is noted for clarity that if the scanning program has identified a pair of string delimiters in a particular line of code in step 220 and there is more code within that particular line, then the scanning program may continue to scan the remainder of that particular line of code and the remaining line(s) of code until the scanning program identifies a pair of string delimiters.
It is noted that the scanning program may reside in disk unit 20 or application 42. It is further noted that the scanning program of the present invention may be implemented to detect non-externalized strings that are not hard-coded in any type of programming language that has the capability of externalizing text strings in resource files.
Although the method, computer program product and data processing system of the present invention is described in connection with several embodiments, it is not intended to be limited to the specific forms set forth herein, but on the contrary, it is intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, as can be reasonably included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. It is noted that the headings are used only for organizational purposes and not meant to limit the scope of the description or claims.
Kumhyr, David Bruce, Chung, Dae-Suk
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11636211, | Jun 27 2019 | BlackBerry Limited | Binary static analysis of application structure to identify vulnerabilities |
8707172, | Nov 12 2009 | International Business Machines Corporation | Internationalization technology |
9047104, | Nov 12 2009 | International Business Machines Corporation | Internationalization technology, including associating a text string in a target computer program with an attribute of a user-interface element |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5012405, | Oct 17 1986 | Hitachi, Ltd. | File management system for permitting user access to files in a distributed file system based on linkage relation information |
5115490, | Jul 15 1988 | Casio Computer Co., Ltd. | Variable length data processing apparatus with delimiter location-based address table |
5222225, | Oct 07 1988 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus for processing character string moves in a data processing system |
5357431, | Jan 27 1992 | Fujitsu Limited | Character string retrieval system using index and unit for making the index |
5414841, | Oct 19 1992 | International Business Machines Corporation; INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES, INC | Computerized system for representing data items using token identifiers |
5423032, | Oct 31 1991 | International Business Machines Corporation; INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION A CORP OF NEW YORK | Method for extracting multi-word technical terms from text |
5495604, | Aug 25 1993 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Method and apparatus for the modeling and query of database structures using natural language-like constructs |
5530794, | Aug 29 1994 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Method and system for handling text that includes paragraph delimiters of differing formats |
5544048, | Dec 17 1992 | International Business Machines | Method and apparatus for marking text between paired delimiters |
5657447, | Aug 31 1995 | International Business Machines Corporation | Platform-transparent registration and build of stored procedures and user-defined functions |
5704060, | May 22 1995 | RPX Corporation | Text storage and retrieval system and method |
5706496, | Mar 15 1995 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Full-text search apparatus utilizing two-stage index file to achieve high speed and reliability of searching a text which is a continuous sequence of characters |
5893134, | Oct 30 1992 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Aligning source texts of different natural languages to produce or add to an aligned corpus |
5913214, | May 30 1996 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology; MADNICK, STUART E ; SIEGEL, MICHAEL D | Data extraction from world wide web pages |
5930508, | Dec 16 1996 | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO , LTD | Method for storing and decoding instructions for a microprocessor having a plurality of function units |
5974256, | Sep 29 1997 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for translating graphical user interface (GUI) resource data into native java code |
5974372, | Feb 12 1996 | DST Systems, Inc. | Graphical user interface (GUI) language translator |
6041323, | Apr 17 1996 | International Business Machines Corporation | Information search method, information search device, and storage medium for storing an information search program |
6055538, | Dec 22 1997 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP | Methods and system for using web browser to search large collections of documents |
6076084, | Jan 03 1994 | Norton-Lambert Corp. | File transfer method and apparatus utilizing delimiters |
6094649, | Dec 22 1997 | HANGER SOLUTIONS, LLC | Keyword searches of structured databases |
6120552, | May 27 1998 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method to exhibit parallelism for computer implementation of computational processing |
6275978, | Nov 04 1998 | Agilent Technologies Inc | System and method for term localization differentiation using a resource bundle generator |
6304870, | Dec 02 1997 | BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, THE | Method and apparatus of automatically generating a procedure for extracting information from textual information sources |
6363392, | Oct 16 1998 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Method and system for providing a web-sharable personal database |
6442598, | Oct 27 1997 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | System and method for delivering web content over a broadcast medium |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 19 2000 | KUMHYR, DAVID B | International Business Machines Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 011283 | /0494 | |
Oct 23 2000 | CHUNG, DAE-SUK | International Business Machines Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 011283 | /0494 | |
Oct 26 2000 | International Business Machines Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 17 2006 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Jun 21 2010 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Nov 14 2010 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Nov 14 2009 | 4 years fee payment window open |
May 14 2010 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 14 2010 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Nov 14 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Nov 14 2013 | 8 years fee payment window open |
May 14 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 14 2014 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Nov 14 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Nov 14 2017 | 12 years fee payment window open |
May 14 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 14 2018 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Nov 14 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |