Protecting the devices of a charge pump includes the connection of a high-voltage transistor between the output node of the charge pump and the load being supplied, and in controlling this transistor with a fraction of the output voltage of the charge pump. This control is accomplished by connecting the control node of the high-voltage transistor to a node of connection between two stages of the multi-stage charge pump onto which a fraction of the controlled output voltage of the multi-stage charge pump is produced. The high-voltage output transistor protects the low voltage devices of the multi-stage charge pump, by preventing the controlled output voltage from undergoing excessively abrupt variations, that could damage the transistors of the last stage of the charge pump.
|
11. A method of protecting low-voltage transistors of a negative voltage multi-stage charge pump from abrupt variations of the output voltage upon coupling a load to the charge pump, the method comprising:
connecting an output high-voltage NMOS transistor between an output node of the negative voltage multi-stage charge pump and the load; and
controlling the output high-voltage NMOS transistor based upon a voltage present on a connection node between two stages of said negative voltage multi-stage charge pump.
4. A method of protecting low-voltage transistors of a positive voltage multi-stage charge pump from abrupt variations of the output voltage upon coupling a load to the charge pump, the method comprising:
connecting an output high-voltage PMOS transistor between an output node of the positive voltage multi-stage charge pump and the load; and
controlling the output high-voltage PMOS transistor based upon a voltage present on a connection node between two stages of said positive voltage multi-stage charge pump.
8. A boosted voltage generator for connection to a load, comprising:
a negative voltage multi-stage charge pump including at least two stages with a connection node therebetween, and generating a boosted negative voltage on an output node; and
an output high-voltage NMOS transistor having conduction terminals connected between the output node of said negative voltage multi-stage charge pump and the load, and having a control terminal connected to the connection node between the at least two stages of said negative voltage multi-stage charge pump.
1. A boosted voltage generator for connection to a load, comprising:
a positive voltage multi-stage charge pump including at least two stages with a connection node therebetween, and generating a boosted positive voltage on an output node; and
an output high-voltage PMOS transistor having conduction terminals connected between the output node of said positive voltage multi-stage charge pump and the load, and having a control terminal connected to the connection node between the at least two stages of said positive voltage multi-stage charge pump.
2. The generator of
3. The generator of
5. The method of
6. The method of
7. The method of
9. The generator of
10. The generator of
12. The method of
13. The method of
14. The method of
|
The present invention relates to boosted voltage generators and more particularly to a multi-stage charge pump having a protection circuit for protecting the devices of the last stage of the multi-stage charge pump.
Charge pump voltage generators are widely used for powering certain electronic circuits at a specified boosted voltage VOut (higher than the supply voltage) that must remain substantially constant notwithstanding variations of the current absorbed by the load currently connected to the output of the boosted voltage generator. Keeping the output boosted voltage VOut of a charge pump substantially constant for ensuring the correct operation of the powered electronic circuits may be difficult in certain situations.
As depicted in
Especially in memory devices, charge-pump generators must power loads of relatively large capacitance. If for example the load capacitance is practically discharged when a certain load is switched to the output node of the powering boosted voltage generator, the charge pump circuit may be momentarily unable to provide the specified voltage, and the output voltage VOut may even drop to zero.
Problems may arise when a load is disconnected from the output node Out of the charge pump and a different load is connected thereto, as shown in
However, there is a penalty in using high-voltage transistors for the charge pump circuit because of the increased silicon area required. For this reason, very often the transistors of the charge pump are “normal” low-voltage transistors, as shown in the latch charge pump circuit of
To prevent these risks that may be determined by a large and abrupt variation of the voltage VOut, it is known to interpose two protection circuits between the output node of the charge pump and the array of switches HV MANAGEMENT, as depicted in
As shown in
A circuit for protecting the charge pump devices acts substantially as a voltage limiter, by preventing the voltage VOutIntto decrease below a minimum value VOutmin. A voltage limiter may be realized by inserting a high-voltage PMOS between the output node of the charge pump and the switches HV MANAGEMENT, as shown in
VOutmin=VRef+VTh (1)
VTh being the threshold voltage of the PMOS transistor.
Preferably, the voltage VOutmin is close to the maximum admissible boosted voltage VXMax on a load, for limiting as much as possible the range of the output voltage VOutExt within which it may vary without turning off the PMOS. A limit condition is:
VOutmin=VXMax (2)
In so doing the voltage VOutInt remains constant
VOutInt=VOutmin=VXMax (3)
and the charge pump is protected.
Unfortunately, a constant voltage VOutInt implies that the current IOut delivered by the charge pump be constant and this is a drawback both in transient as well as in steady state conditions. To better understand why this is a drawback, consider first the case of steady state functioning and model the loads Li to be powered by the charge pump with current generators ILi. For dimensioning the charge pump it is necessary to determine its total capacitance CTot, given by the following equation:
wherein f is the frequency of the clock signal used by the charged pump. To evaluate the maximum total capacitance, in the above equation (4), the current IOut is substituted with the maximum current IXMax that the loads Li may absorb, while the voltage VOutInt is the maximum possible voltage VXMax. The maximum capacitance CTotLim is
The voltage on the load is always smaller than or equal to the voltage VXMax.
If the voltage on the load is VXMax, then the voltage limiter does not introduce any loss of efficiency, while if it is smaller than VXMax, the voltage limiter causes inefficiency by not allowing the voltage VOutInt to become smaller than the voltage VXMax. By contrast, without the limiter, the voltage VOutInt would decrease to a desired voltage VXDes and this would allow the charge pump to deliver to the load a current IXDes larger than the maximum current that it may deliver in presence of the voltage limiter. This situation is illustrated by the diagram of
Alternatively, a charge pump without voltage limiter for delivering a certain maximum current IXMax, at a certain voltage VXDes<VXMax, could be designed with a smaller capacitance than that CTotLim required when the voltage limiter is present. Therefore, the presence of the voltage limiter in steady state conditions implies increasing the design capacitance CTot of the charge pump and thus the silicon area requisite.
The graph of
By summarizing, the drawback of using the voltage limiter is that of fixing the voltage VOutmim. If VOutmin is smaller than VXMax the charge pump may be damaged. If VOutmin equals VXMax the charge pump is protected but the silicon area occupied by the charge pump is increased.
To avoid the drawbacks determined by the presence of a voltage limiter, it is necessary to use a circuit capable of varying the voltage VOutInt, in particular a circuit capable of reducing it from its maximum value (for instance VXMax) to zero, for adapting it as necessary. This circuit should also let the voltage VOutInt decrease slowly in respect to a clock period for permitting the internal nodes Int of the charge pump to fall in line with the gradual voltage reduction.
Referring to
ILim=IOut (6)
The possibility of VOutInt dropping to zero must be contemplated, therefore the current ILim must be larger than or equal to the current IOut that would be obtained with a null voltage VOutInt, that is:
ILim≧IOut|VOutInt=0 (7)
This is inconvenient. In fact the current IOut when VOutInt is null is two or three times larger than the current IOut when the voltage VOutInt is equal to VXMax.
IOut|VOutInt=0≅2÷3IOut|VOutInt=steady
In turn, the current ILim must be larger than or equal to IOut|VOutInt= and this may determine an excessively fast decreasing of the voltage VOutInt. For example, for a charge pump that must provide a steady state current IOut|VOutInt=steady
Therefore, in a half-period of 25 ns of the clock, the voltage VOutInt would drop by about 25-50V, and this is very risky for the charge pump integrity.
To prevent this, it is a common practice to connect a relatively large additional capacitor CAdd in parallel with the capacitance COutInt, as shown in
Unfortunately, the required additional capacitor occupies a relatively large silicon area.
This invention provides an efficient and effective approach to the problem of protecting a multi-stage charge pump from abrupt reductions of the output voltage required by a certain load to be supplied by the charge pump that significantly reduces the silicon area requirement compared to the above discussed known approaches.
It has been found that the problem of protecting the devices that compose the charge pump is more efficiently solved by connecting a high-voltage transistor, that is a transistor capable of withstanding a voltage drop across its current terminals equal to the maximum voltage that must be supplied to a load, between the output node of the charge pump and the load being supplied, and in controlling this transistor with a fraction of the output voltage of the charge pump. This is accomplished by connecting the control node of the high-voltage transistor to a node of connection between two stages of the multi-stage charge pump onto which a fraction of the controlled output voltage of the multi-stage charge pump is produced.
In practice, the high-voltage output transistor protects the low voltage devices of the multi-stage charge pump, by preventing the controlled output voltage from undergoing excessively abrupt variations, that could damage the transistors of the last stage of the charge pump.
The various aspects and advantages of the invention will become even more evident through the following description of a preferred embodiment, referring to the attached drawings, wherein:
According to this invention, the output voltage VOutInt of the charge pump is effectively limited and forced to decrease gradually while using a circuit architecture with similar features to that of
ΔVf=VOutInt−VOutmin=VOutInt−(VRef+VTh) (11)
By connecting the control node of the added high voltage PMOS output transistor to an intermediate node Int of the charge pump, that is to the connection node of two stages of the multi-stage charge pump, as shown in
This feature may be better understood by modeling the charge pump with an equivalent circuit. As depicted in
wherein f is the clock frequency.
The equivalent circuit of
if the source-gate voltage VSG of the PMOS is negligible by realizing the transistor with a sufficiently wide channel. The current ILim is substantially the same current output by the charge pump when the voltage VOutInt is null:
wherein N>>1.
The control node of the high-voltage PMOS may be connected to any intermediate node (1, 2, . . . , N in
In the embodiment described, a high-voltage PMOS has been used as voltage and current limiter, but a skilled person would immediately recognize that this choice was done because the boosted voltage of the generator was implicitly assumed to be positive. If instead, the charge pump generates a negative boosted voltage, a high-voltage NMOS would be used in place of the PMOS.
By summarizing, the generator of this invention behaves as a voltage limiter during same half-periods, thus protecting the charge pump, and as a current limiter over several clock periods for allowing the voltage VOutInt to decrease gradually, even down to zero, if the voltage drop on the supplied load becomes practically null. These objectives are achieved by adding a high voltage PMOS and thus with a very limited added requisite of silicon area compared to the known approaches.
Ucciardello, Carmelo, Palumbo, Gaetano, Pappalardo, Domenico, Di Mauro, Rosa, Sorrentino, Francesco, Maganuco, Giuseppe
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10033271, | Dec 30 2016 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Multi-stage charge pump |
10651800, | Feb 10 2017 | CIRRUS LOGIC INTERNATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR LTD | Boosted amplifier with current limiting |
10826452, | Feb 10 2017 | CIRRUS LOGIC INTERNATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR LTD | Charge pump with current mode output power throttling |
11152906, | Feb 10 2017 | Cirrus Logic, Inc. | Charge pump with current mode output power throttling |
11270177, | Oct 02 2019 | NXP B.V. | RFID transponder and corresponding operating method |
11593603, | Nov 20 2020 | NXP B.V. | Rectifier circuits and corresponding methods for RFID devices |
7583132, | Jul 19 2006 | STMicroelectronics S.r.l. | Charge pump circuit |
7710195, | Feb 15 2008 | International Business Machines Corporation | Two stage voltage boost circuit with precharge circuit preventing leakage, IC and design structure |
7724073, | Oct 12 2007 | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO , LTD | Charge pump circuit |
7733161, | Feb 15 2008 | International Business Machines Corporation | Voltage boost system, IC and design structure |
7737766, | Feb 15 2008 | International Business Machines Corporation | Two stage voltage boost circuit, IC and design structure |
8000152, | Jun 13 2006 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Charge pump operation in a non-volatile memory device |
8194466, | Jun 13 2006 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Charge pump operation in a non-volatile memory device |
8258758, | Jul 01 2008 | International Business Machines Corporation | System to improve a multistage charge pump and associated methods |
8547754, | Jun 13 2006 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Charge pump operation in a non-volatile memory device |
8598945, | Jun 21 2010 | Qorvo US, Inc | High voltage charge-pump with a feedback control loop |
8729950, | May 30 2012 | Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC | High voltage clamp circuit |
8860500, | Jul 20 2012 | Analog Devices International Unlimited Company | Charge transfer apparatus and method |
8981843, | May 31 2012 | Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC | Translator including overstress protection |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4839787, | May 20 1987 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Integrated high voltage generating system |
5898335, | Mar 15 1993 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | High voltage generator circuit |
6278315, | Jan 23 1998 | HYUNDAI ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES CO , LTD | High voltage generating circuit and method for generating a signal maintaining high voltage and current characteristics therewith |
6476666, | May 30 2001 | ADVANCED DATA ACCESS LLC | Bootstrapped charge pump |
20030214346, | |||
20050093614, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 03 2005 | STMicroelectronics S.r.l. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Mar 17 2005 | UCCIARDELLO, CARMELO | STMICROELECTRONICS S R L | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016493 | /0357 | |
Mar 17 2005 | DI MAURO, ROSA | STMICROELECTRONICS S R L | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016493 | /0357 | |
Mar 17 2005 | PAPPALARDO, DOMENICO | STMICROELECTRONICS S R L | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016493 | /0357 | |
Mar 17 2005 | SORRENTINO, FRANCESCO | STMICROELECTRONICS S R L | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016493 | /0357 | |
Mar 17 2005 | MAGANUCO, GIUSEPPE | STMICROELECTRONICS S R L | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016493 | /0357 | |
Mar 17 2005 | PALUMBO, GAETANO | STMICROELECTRONICS S R L | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016493 | /0357 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 25 2011 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jan 28 2015 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jan 28 2019 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 14 2010 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Feb 14 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 14 2011 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 14 2013 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 14 2014 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Feb 14 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 14 2015 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 14 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 14 2018 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Feb 14 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 14 2019 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 14 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |