In a golf ball composed of a resilient solid core and a resin cover which encloses the core and has on an outside surface thereof numerous circular dimples, the cover has a maximum thickness of 0.5 to 1.5 mm and is made of a polyurethane elastomer having a shore d hardness of 40 to 58; the total number of dimples on the cover is from 390 to 420, of which 40 to 80 are small-diameter dimples with a diameter of 2.0 to 2.7 mm; and the dimples are arranged so that total planar surfaces circumscribed by dimple edges which delineate boundaries between individual dimples and surrounding land areas that form an outermost surface of the ball account for 74 to 84% to an imaginary sphere defined by the surface of the ball having no dimples thereon. The golf ball of the invention does not readily lose lift even near the highest point in the trajectory of the ball when it has been hit, and thus can beneficially increase the distance of travel.
|
1. A golf ball comprising a resilient solid core and a resin cover which encloses the core and has on an outside surface thereof numerous circular dimples, the golf ball being characterized in that the cover has a maximum thickness of 0.5 to 1.5 mm and is made of a polyurethane elastomer having a shore d hardness of 40 to 58; the total number of dimples on the cover is from 390 to 420, of which 40 to 80 are small-diameter dimples with a diameter of 2.0 to 2.7 mm; and the dimples are arranged so that total planar surfaces circumscribed by dimple edges which delineate boundaries between individual dimples and surrounding land areas that form an outermost surface of the ball account for 74 to 84% to an imaginary sphere defined by the surface of the ball having no dimples thereon;
wherein an intermediate layer made of resin is disposed between the solid core and the cover, and the intermediate layer has a shore d hardness of 45 to 65.
10. A golf ball comprising a resilient solid core and a resin cover which encloses the core and has on an outside surface thereof numerous circular dimples, the golf bail being characterized in that the cover has a maximum thickness of 0.5 to 1.5 mm and is made of a polyurethane elastomer having a shore d hardness of 40 to 58; the total number of dimples on the cover is from 390 to 420, of which 40 to 80 are small-diameter dimples with a diameter of 2.0 to 2.7 mm; and the dimples are arranged so that total planar surfaces circumscribed by dimple edges which delineate boundaries between individual dimples and surrounding an outermost surface of the bail account for 74 to 84% to an imaginary sphere defined by the surface of the ball having no dimples thereon,
wherein an intermediate layer made of resin is disposed between the solid core and the cover, and the shore d hardness of the intermediate layer is substantially the same as or higher than that of the cover.
3. The golf ball of
5. The golf ball of
8. The golf ball of
9. The golf ball of
12. The golf ball of
14. The golf ball of
17. The golf ball of
18. The golf ball of
|
The present invention relates to a golf ball having an excellent flight performance.
In the past, to improve both the feel of solid golf balls on impact and their controllability, such balls were optimized for properties such as core and cover hardness under high-trajectory conditions owing to a relatively high spin rate.
However, it was later found that a golf ball hit at a low spin and a high launch angle will travel a longer distance. Hence, greater effort has come to be devoted to increasing the distance of travel in a manner which is in keeping with these findings. With recent advances in golfing equipment such as balls and clubs, designs are being worked out on drivers and other golf clubs built for distance that greatly reduce the amount of backspin taken on by a golf ball when hit.
Under low-spin conditions, the ball that has been hit will have a small coefficient of drag, which tends to increase its distance of travel. Yet, when the dimples that have been used in earlier golf balls are used unchanged in these more advanced golf balls, a drop occurs due to insufficient lift in the region of diminishing speed after the highest point of the ball's trajectory, resulting in a loss of distance.
It is thus an object of the invention to provide a golf ball which, owing to the optimization of such ball characteristics as the total number of dimples arranged on a specific golf ball cover, the combination of large and small dimples, and the density of the dimple arrangement, does not readily lose lift even near the highest point in the trajectory of the ball during flight, and thus can beneficially increase the distance traveled by the ball.
We have conducted extensive investigations, as a result of which we have found that, with regard to circular dimples arranged on the surface of a golf ball, by using a plurality of dimple types of differing diameter within a fixed range in the total number of dimples and by arranging the dimples so that dimples of a relatively small diameter are included in a given amount and combined to a high density with dimples of a relatively large diameter, the distance traveled by the ball is increased and the flight performance is stabilized.
Accordingly, the invention provides the following golf balls.
The invention is described more fully below in conjunction with the diagrams.
Referring to
The cover 12 is made of a polyurethane elastomer, has a maximum thickness t1 of 0.5 to 1.5 mm, and has a Shore D hardness of 40 to 58. When the intermediate layer 13 shown in
The intermediate layer 13 in such a case may have a Shore D hardness of 45 to 65 and a thickness t2 of 1.0 to 2.0 mm. It is preferable for the Shore D hardness of the intermediate layer 13 to be about the same as or higher (harder) than that of the cover 12.
A total of 390 to 420, and preferably 396 to 416 dimples 2, of which 40 to 80 are small-diameter dimples having a diameter of 2.0 to 2.7 mm, are uniformly arranged on the outside surface of the ball. At a total number of dimples greater than 420, a ball hit with a club designed for distance, such as a driver, will have too low a trajectory and thus be unable to achieve the desired distance. On the other hand, at a total number of dimples below 390, the trajectory rises too high and the variation in the carry of the ball tends to increase.
In the practice of the invention, letting the planar surface area of the circle circumscribed by a dimple edge e which delineates the boundary between a dimple 2 and a land area (the lands are the outer portions of the ball's surface except the dimples) 3 be s, the sum S of such surface areas for all the dimples on the ball, expressed as a ratio SR relative to the surface area T of an imaginary sphere defined by the surface of the ball were it to have no dimples thereon (SR=S/T×100), is from 74 to 84%. In
Referring to
In the invention, it is preferable for a dimple margin X (a given region of the dimple that extends from the base or sidewall of the dimple to the dimple edge) connecting to surrounding land areas 3 to be formed so as to be circularly arcuate in cross-section with a radius of curvature r of from 0.3 to 2.0 mm. In
In the practice of the invention, to enable the dimples to be arranged in a good balance and to suppress the variability of flight by the ball when hit, it is preferable for the dimple diameter Dm to be from 2.0 to 4.5 mm. To improve the lift of the ball, it is desirable to include from 200 to 290 large-diameter dimples having a diameter of 3.8 to 4.5 mm.
With regard to the number of dimple types arranged on the outer surface of the ball, it is preferable to use at least 4 types but not more than 20 types of differing diameter within the above diameter range of 2.0 to 4.5 mm. With less than four dimple types of differing diameter, it is difficult to arrange the dimples on the outside surface of the ball in a good balance and to a high density (so that the ratio SR of the total surface area of the dimples to the outside surface overall is 74 to 84%). On the other hand, with more than 20 dimple types of differing diameter, the improvement in the density of the arrangement is too small to justify the additional difficulty encountered in mold fabrication.
The dimple arrangement diagrams, number of dimples, and various parameters of each type of dimple for the golf balls obtained in the respective Examples of the invention and Comparative Examples are presented in Table 1 below. The symbols representing dimple characteristics in the top line of Table 1 are explained below.
Vo
Referring to
Vs
Vs is the overall volume of a dimple space under the planar surface circumscribed by the dimple edge e. Values in parentheses are the sum of the volumes for all dimples.
r
The symbol r represents the radius of curvature at the dimple margin (
SR
SR is the area of the dimple surfaces (planar surfaces circumscribed by dimple edges e) summed over the entire outside surface of the ball and expressed as a ratio relative to the surface area of an imaginary sphere defined by the surface of the ball having no dimples thereon.
TABLE 1
Corresponding
Number of
Diameter
Depth
r
SR
diagram
dimples
(mm)
(mm)
Vo
Vs
(mm)
(%)
Example
1
FIG. 1
48
4.36
0.159
0.474
1.130
1.0
80.6
192
4.05
0.146
0.468
0.880
1.0
78
3.67
0.148
0.463
0.723
1.0
36
3.40
0.145
0.454
0.598
1.0
54
2.55
0.096
0.419
0.206
1.0
Total:
408
(0.456)
(312.3)
2
FIG. 4
12
4.36
0.172
0.475
1.220
0.5
75.1
240
3.91
0.163
0.469
0.918
0.5
54
3.67
0.158
0.455
0.760
0.5
48
3.38
0.145
0.452
0.588
0.5
48
2.52
0.095
0.425
0.201
0.5
Total:
402
(0.455)
(313.9)
Comparative Example
1
FIG. 5
150
4.02
0.152
0.468
0.903
0.5
81.4
192
3.83
0.145
0.453
0.757
0.5
60
3.22
0.138
0.448
0.503
0.5
12
2.53
0.095
0.421
0.201
0.5
Total:
414
(0.448)
(313.3)
2
FIG. 6
348
3.88
0.148
0.478
0.836
<0.1
80.3
12
2.95
0.125
0.432
0.369
<0.1
12
3.43
0.132
0.442
0.539
<0.1
60
2.48
0.092
0.421
0.187
<0.1
Total:
432
(0.443)
(313.2)
3
FIG. 7
12
4.36
0.165
0.482
1.187
0.5
75.8
240
4.05
0.161
0.465
0.964
0.5
6
3.91
0.152
0.458
0.836
0.5
84
3.58
0.138
0.452
0.628
0.5
30
2.53
0.102
0.436
0.224
0.5
Total:
372
(0.459)
(310.2)
In connection with the dimple values shown in Table 1, a dimple depth of from 0.08 to 0.25 mm is preferred, an average value Vo of 0.4 to 0.6 is preferred, and an overall dimple volume Vs of 270 to 350 mm3 is preferred.
Next, to evaluate the flight performances of the golf balls (all having a diameter of 42.7 mm) obtained in Examples 1 and 2 of the invention and in Comparative Examples 1 to 3, the distances traveled by the balls when hit were tested. All of the balls had the following materials and construction.
Solid Core
The solid core was formed as a single layer of polybutadiene rubber. The solid core had a deflection, as measured by placing the core on a hard plate, applying an initial load of 10 kg, then increasing the load from this state to 130 kg, of 2.98 mm
Cover
A thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer was used as the cover material, and the cover was formed to a thickness (t1) of 1.0 mm. The cover had a shore D hardness of 50.
Intermediate Layer
A three-layer construction was used in which one intermediate layer composed of an ionomer resin was placed between the cover and the core. The intermediate layer had a thickness (t2) of 1.7 mm and a shore D hardness of 64.
Ten balls obtained from each of Examples 1 and 2 and Comparative Examples 1 to 3 were hit at a head speed of 45 m/s with a driver (W#1) mounted on a swing robot, and the distance traveled by the ball was measured. The average values obtained in each example are shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2
Example
Comparative Example
1
2
1
2
3
Distance
Carry
221
220
216
215
220
traveled (m)
Total distance
235
232
230
228
227
Sato, Katsunori, Kasashima, Atsuki
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5601503, | Mar 06 1995 | Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. | Golf ball |
5752889, | Feb 09 1996 | Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. | Two-piece solid golf ball |
5993332, | Mar 13 1997 | Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. | Solid golf ball |
6015356, | Jan 13 1997 | Callaway Golf Company | Golf ball and method of producing same |
6346053, | Sep 16 1997 | Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. | Golf ball |
6659889, | Jul 27 2001 | Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. | Golf ball |
7083533, | Oct 26 2001 | Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. | Golf ball |
JP2003126301, | |||
JP200338681, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Nov 22 2005 | Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Dec 01 2005 | KASASHIMA, ATSUKI | BRIDGESTONE SPORTS CO , LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 017576 | /0329 | |
Dec 01 2005 | SATO, KATSUNORI | BRIDGESTONE SPORTS CO , LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 017576 | /0329 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 27 2009 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Sep 20 2011 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Nov 25 2015 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Dec 02 2019 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jun 10 2011 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Dec 10 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 10 2012 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jun 10 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jun 10 2015 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Dec 10 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 10 2016 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jun 10 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jun 10 2019 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Dec 10 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 10 2020 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jun 10 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |