A method and a device reduces the vibration generated on the structure 17 of a helicopter 2 by the flow of air through the main rotor 5 and by the flow of air along the fuselage 3. The device 1 includes: at least one sensor 18, 19, 20 measuring the vibration generated on the structure 17; and computer element 30 responsive to the vibration measurements to determine variation in the angle of incidence of a tail fin 9 of the helicopter 2 suitable for generating an opposing force {right arrow over (T1)}, {right arrow over (T2)} for opposing the vibration, and transmitting the variation in angle of incidence as determined in this way to a control system 10 for controlling the angle of incidence of the tail fin 9.
|
1. A method of reducing vibration in a structure of a helicopter having a main rotor and a tail boom with a steerable tail fin and a tail rotor, comprising the steps of:
exciting a lateral vibration in the tail boom of the helicopter with a downward flow of air from the main rotor onto the structure of the helicopter, the downward flow of air having a diameter substantially equal to a diameter of the main rotor and having varying pressure and speed;
measuring the lateral vibration on at least one location of the helicopter;
determining a variation of an angle of incidence of a movable control surface of the tail fin that generates a force opposing the measured lateral vibration; and
varying the angle of incidence of the movable control surface of the tail fin the determined variation to generate the force opposing the measured lateral vibration without applying alternating variation to a pitch of blades of the tail rotor.
2. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
6. The method of
8. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
11. The method of
|
The present invention relates to a method and to a device for reducing the vibration generated on the structure of a helicopter both by the flow of air coming from the main rotor which serves to provide lift and propulsion to the helicopter and by the flow of air along its fuselage.
It is known that when the main rotor turns, it sucks in air from upstream and blows it out downstream like a propeller, thereby allowing the helicopter to fly up and down. When flying forwards, the rotor acts both as a propeller and as a wing. As a propeller it accelerates the mass of air that passes through it so as to create a moving slipstream, with the pressure and the speed of the air varying along said slipstream. Acting as a wing, the rotor causes the slipstream to be deflected.
The stream of air downstream from the main rotor, commonly referred to as the “slipstream”, is disturbed in part by the main elements for rotating the main rotor and by certain fairings, or indeed the helicopter fuselage itself, in particular when carrying external loads or during special flight configuration.
The main rotor is set into rotation by a driving force applied to its shaft. For this purpose, the engine on board the helicopter drives the shaft via an appropriate mechanical assembly. This leads to equal and opposite torque being applied to the fuselage, and this torque needs to be compensated by means of an auxiliary device such as a tail rotor, which is generally also driven by the same engine.
In addition the fuselage and the rotors, it is also known that a helicopter also includes one or more substantially horizontal stabilizers and one more substantially vertical tail fins. These elements are for the most part located at the rear of the fuselage and serve to provide the helicopter with control, stability, and the ability to maneuver about two perpendicular axes. It should be observed that the horizontal stabilizers and the tail fin may sometimes be constituted in the form of a single assembly of T-shape or of cross-shape (+). Similarly, the vertical tail fin may be formed by a single aerodynamic surface or it may be in the form of two aerodynamic surfaces forming a V-shape, for example. Another solution consists in placing a substantially vertical tail fin at the outside end of a substantially horizontal stabilizer. Nevertheless, these examples are not limiting.
The tail fin and the stabilizer are generally stationary and are consequently located at the rear end of the fuselage (in a zone referred to as the “tail boom” by the person skilled in the art), and they are to be found in a zone which is subjected at least in part to the air flow or slipstream coming from the main rotor and from the fuselage.
In practice, the main rotor acts like an aerodynamic exciter. Thus, its slipstream is turbulent. Turbulence corresponds to variations in pressure, speed, and angle of incidence of the aerodynamic flow that are distributed over quite a broad range of relatively high frequencies.
The slipstream behind the main rotor of a helicopter is pulsed at a fundamental frequency equal to the product b×Ω where b is the number of blades of the main rotor and Ω is the speed of rotation of said rotor.
Nevertheless, frequencies which are harmonics of b×Ω can sometimes also appear.
Under such conditions, the tail fin and the stabilizer are subjected simultaneously to said aerodynamic excitation which leads directly to exciting resonant modes of the helicopter structure. This phenomenon is generally known as “tail shake”.
Furthermore, during certain stages of flight (e.g. during quartering flight), it is possible that the “tail shake” phenomenon is caused not by the slipstream from the main rotor but by the slipstream from the fuselage. A helicopter fuselage often carries external items (winches, missiles, torpedoes, auxiliary tanks, . . . ) which have the effect of spoiling (increasing drag and turbulence) the air flow from the fuselage itself. The turbulence which is the main cause of said tail shake can be small or negligible during nominal flight (cruising flight in a calm atmosphere), but can become much stronger during certain stages of flight (quartering flight, flight in a turbulent atmosphere, . . . ).
Even if the aerodynamic excitation is relatively small, it can lead to a level of vibration that is disagreeable in the cockpit and in the passenger cabin and that is harmful for the structure as a whole and for the mechanical elements of the helicopter.
The vibration as generated in this way can be distributed over the various axes of the structure as a function of where the slipstream strikes. For example, if it is applied to the vertical tail fin, that will generate an effect that is mainly lateral, and in particular it will excite a first mode of resonance in lateral bending of the tail boom. Conversely, if the slipstream reaches the horizontal stabilizer, then the vibration will be mainly vertical, thereby exciting the first resonant mode of the tail boom in vertical bending.
The various kinds of vibration due to the first lateral and/or vertical bending mode of the structure of the helicopter, and possibly also to a resonant mode in twisting of the helicopter, all present numerous drawbacks, including the following:
In an attempt to provide a solution to this problem, documents FR 2 737 181 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,816,533 disclose a method and a device for generating an effect that opposes vibration by applying alternating variation to the pitch of the blades of the tail rotor of the helicopter.
Nevertheless, it has been found that the solution according to those patents FR 2 737 181 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,816,533 presents a first drawback associated with the fact that the aerodynamic excitation leads to excitation of resonant modes of the fuselage structure, and the blades of the tail rotor are controlled in order to reduce the vibration that results therefrom at certain particular points of the helicopter. Unfortunately, that action tends to shift the vibration nodes and anti-nodes along the structure, but without thereby eliminating excitation of the resonant modes of said structure.
As a result, the tail fin and the horizontal stabilizer, in particular, are subjected to the bending of the structure where they are attached thereto, depending on the way the structure responds to the excitation.
A second drawback of the system described in those patents lies in an increase in the level of noise that is generated because of the variations in the characteristic parameters (speed, pressure, . . . ) of the air flow through the tail rotor as generated by varying the angle of incidence of its blades. These effects are harmful for the environment and raise severe problems in terms of regulations.
It should also be observed, by way of example, that another drawback due to changing the angle of incidence of the blades of the tail rotor for opposing the above-mentioned vibration lies in said variations in the angle of incidence of the blades of said rotor generally generating alternating forces and moments which reduce the lifetime of the assembly of parts constituting the rotor and the means for driving it in rotation.
An object of the present invention is to remedy those drawbacks. It provides a method making it possible to reduce or even eliminate in simple and effective manner the vibration that is generated on the structure of a helicopter by the air flow or slipstream through the main rotor for providing lift and propulsion to said helicopter, and/or by the air flow along the fuselage, said helicopter including at least one tail fin that is steerable, at least in part, a fuselage, a main lift and propulsion rotor, and where appropriate a tail rotor with variable pitch blades.
To this end, said method of the invention is remarkable in that it comprises:
a) measuring the generated vibration at at least one location on the structure of the helicopter;
b) on the basis of said measurements, determining a variation in the angle of incidence of at least a portion of the tail fin that is suitable for generating an opposing force for opposing said vibration; and
c) applying said variation in the angle of incidence as determined in this way to a control system for controlling the angle of incidence of at least a part of said tail fin, without applying alternating variation to the pitch of the blades of the tail rotor.
Thus, by generating said opposing force, it is possible in simple and effective manner to reduce said vibration having the drawbacks as mentioned above.
It should also be observed that the method of the invention is particularly effective in that it enables the effect of the aerodynamic excitation to be eliminated at source, i.e. at the tail fin itself, because of the way the angle of incidence of the tail fin is controlled. Consequently, the resonant modes of the fuselage can no longer be excited merely by interference between the pulsed and turbulent slipstream from the main rotor and from the air flow along the fuselage.
In addition, it should be observed that since the frequency of said vibration generally lies in the vicinity of a range extending from 5 hertz (Hz) to 6 Hz, or in said range, the frequency of the system for controlling variation in the angle of incidence of the tail fin can reach 20 Hz for example, in which case it is much higher than the frequency at which the tail rotor is maneuvered by the pilot (generally below 1 Hz) for yaw control, so that implementing the method of the invention has no consequences on yaw control of the helicopter.
In order to avoid applying control continuously and in order to take account only of the most important and most harmful part of the vibration, it is advantageous to apply frequency filtering to the vibration measurements, and in step b) of the method of the invention to take account only of the vibration measurements as filtered.
To this end, it is preferable to use a lowpass filter having a cutoff frequency situated in a range of about 20 Hz to 30 Hz.
In addition, for reasons of stability and safety, the amplitude of the opposing force is advantageously limited to a predefined value.
In addition, for reasons of maneuverability, and also in order to detect any degradation in the unbalance of the main rotor of the helicopter, the application of the method of the invention for reducing vibration can be interrupted so long as said helicopter is on the ground.
Similarly, application of the method can be deactivated while the helicopter is subjected to particular flight conditions.
When the method of the invention is applied to a helicopter having a tail fin that is substantially parallel to the plane of symmetry containing the longitudinal axis and the vertical axis of the helicopter, advantageously:
Under such circumstances, the tail fin may present one of the following characteristics:
When there are two tail fins, the helicopter may also include a tail fin that is substantially vertical and that lies in the above-mentioned plane of symmetry.
When at least one tail fin is inclined at least in part relative to said plane of symmetry, then advantageously:
In which case, the tail fin presents at least one of the following characteristics:
Furthermore, in order to minimize any possible additional vertical vibration, at least one substantially horizontal stabilizer that is tiltable in angle of incidence is used to generate a vertical opposing force for opposing said vertical vibration. Consequently, this substantially horizontal stabilizer serves to counter the effects of vertical vibration either completely if none of the tail fins is inclined, or else in part when said vertical vibration is already reduced to some extent by means of at least one inclined tail fin.
The stabilizer is substantially horizontal and is remarkable in that it includes at least one of the following characteristics:
Advantageously, the method is also implemented to vary the angle of incidence of a portion only of a tail fin or of a stabilizer, i.e. of a flap located at the trailing edge of said tail fin or said stabilizer, with the span of said flap possibly being smaller than the span of said tail fin or of said stabilizer. Under such circumstances, the upstream portion of said tail fin or of said stabilizer is stationary.
It should also be observed that said lateral and/or horizontal vibration can be measured specifically on each tail fin and/or each substantially horizontal stabilizer so as to move each of those aerodynamic surfaces in such a manner as to avoid any excitation of resonant modes of the fuselage or of the tail boom under the effect of slipstream excitation.
The present invention also provides a device for reducing or even eliminating the vibration that is generated on the structure of a helicopter by the aerodynamic flow or slipstream through the main rotor for providing lift and propulsion to said helicopter, and/or by the air flow over the fuselage, said helicopter including at least one steerable tail fin at the rear end of the fuselage having an angle of incidence that is controlled by a control system.
According to the invention, said device is remarkable in that it comprises:
In a particular embodiment, said device advantageously additionally includes at least one substantially horizontal stabilizer that is tiltable and that has an angle of incidence that can be varied under the control of said computer means in order to generate a vertical opposing force for opposing said additional vertical vibration.
Said sensor may be constituted in particular by one of the following variants:
Advantageously, said sensor is disposed on the stationary portion of the steerable tail fin, and optionally on the stationary portion of the tiltable stabilizer.
The invention may be applied to a helicopter that does not have an (anti-torque) tail rotor.
The accompanying figures show clearly how the invention can be implemented. In the figures, identical references are used to designate elements that are similar.
The device 1 of the invention and shown diagrammatically in
As can be seen in
Said tail fin 9 used for providing said helicopter 2 with yaw stability can be steered in incidence by means of a control system 10 which comprises:
In order to provide lift and forward drive for the helicopter 2, it is known that the main rotor 5 sucks in air from a space E1 situated above the helicopter and discharges it into a space E2 situated beneath it, with the air being accelerated. This establishes a slipstream A of moving air with varying pressure and speed, of a diameter at the helicopter 2 that is substantially equal to the diameter of the rotary wing V, as shown in
This vibration is mainly, but not exclusively, lateral vibration, and it is due mainly to the aerodynamic flow exciting resonant modes of the structure 17 of the helicopter 2, and in particular exciting the first lateral bending mode of the tail boom 4 of the helicopter 2.
The vibration due to this first lateral bending mode generally presents a frequency of a few hertz, and it is particularly troublesome.
The various kinds of vibration as generated in this way present drawbacks in particular in respect of the following:
The device 1 of the invention is intended to reduce said lateral vibration in order to remedy those drawbacks.
To this end, the device 1 comprises:
Thus, existing vibration is reduced by the opposing force {right arrow over (T1)} generated by controlling the angle of incidence of the tail fin 9.
Since the frequency of said opposing force {right arrow over (T1)} is at least equal to the frequency of the vibration in question, i.e. 5 Hz to 6 Hz as mentioned above, the operation of the device 1 of the invention has no effect on controlling the helicopter 2 in yaw, where such control takes place at frequencies that are much lower, generally less than 1 Hz.
In addition, the device 1 of the invention makes it possible to limit the resonance of one or more resonant modes of the structure that are situated close to a harmonic of the frequency of rotation of the main rotor, and at which deformation of the tail boom of the helicopter 2 becomes large.
Furthermore, it is important to observe that by having at least one of the sensors 18, 19, and 20 on the tail fin itself, the excitation of the tail boom 4 can be cancelled since the corrective effect takes place at the tail fin 9 itself, which fin is subjected to the excitation produced by the slipstream. As a result, the structure of the helicopter as a whole is not subjected to the aerodynamic disturbances exerted on said tail fin 9.
As can be seen more clearly in
Under such circumstances, when the helicopter is subjected to vertical vibration in addition to said lateral vibration, the invention makes it possible to use a substantially horizontal stabilizer 39 (shown in
Naturally, the present invention also applies to a helicopter 2 in which at least one of the tail fins slopes relative to the plane of symmetry P of the helicopter, as shown in
To this end, variation in the angle of incidence of the tail fin 9 is determined suitable for generating an opposing force {right arrow over (T2)} that presents a lateral component {right arrow over (TY2)} and a component {right arrow over (TZ2)} such that:
Furthermore, said computer means 30 may incorporate filter means for frequency filtering the measured vibration so as to retain only vibration at a frequency that is below a determined frequency of the order of 20 Hz to 30 Hz. This serves in particular to avoid controlling said tail fin and/or said stabilizer on a quasi-continuous basis, by ignoring certain kinds of vibration that are negligible.
Alternatively, a bandpass filter could be used.
In a particularly advantageous embodiment, said computer means 30 may also be connected to means (not shown) serving to indicate when the helicopter 2 is on the ground so that said computer means 30 then transmits no control orders to the control device 15, for as long as said helicopter 2 remains on the ground. The device 1 of the invention is thus made inactive while on the ground, thus making it possible in particular to detect any possible degradation in the unbalance of the helicopter, where such detection would be impossible were the device 1 to be in operation.
Furthermore, in another particular embodiment that is not shown, it is also possible to provide for the device 1 of the invention to made inactive while in flight, on the appearance of particular flight conditions.
Naturally, and as shown diagrammatically in
It will also be understood that the invention can be implemented in variants such as the following, for example:
Furthermore, it is also possible to control the angle of incidence of a complete tail fin 50 located at each end of a stabilizer 39, for example, or the angle of incidence of flaps 51 fitted to such tail fins 50, in which case the upstream portions 51′ are then stationary, as shown in
Naturally, these tail fins 50 may also be in a V-shape (not shown) taking the place of the tail fin 9 or in addition to the tail fin 9.
Similarly, it will be understood that varying the angle of incidence of a tail fin 9, 40, 50, 51, and possibly also varying the angle of incidence of a substantially horizontal stabilizer 39, 45 needs to be adapted to each configuration of tail fin and stabilizer and to each flight configuration.
For this purpose, the computer means 30 make use of information relating to each flight configuration, namely, for example: the vertical and horizontal speeds and the attitudes and positions of the helicopter. This information is picked up by sensors 60 for sensing flight configuration (or stage) parameters and delivered to the computer means 30, with the sensors 60 being connected via a connection 61 to said computer means 30.
Under such conditions, said sensors 18, 19, 20 may advantageously be fixed to said tail fin 9, 40, 50, 51 that is steerable, at least in part, and to said tiltable stabilizer 39, 45; said sensor(s) is (are) advantageously fixed to a stationary part of said tail fin and of said stabilizer.
In a preferred embodiment, the travel speed of the helicopter through the air is measured using an indicated air speed (IAS) sensor; and the gain with which changes in the angle of incidence of the tail fin, and where appropriate of the horizontal stabilizer, is caused to vary as a function of the measured speed.
In a particular embodiment, when the air speed exceeds a predetermined threshold value, said gain G is inversely proportional to the square of the air speed, in particular in application of the following equation:
where k is a constant, M is the (filtered) measured vibration, and φ is a phase offset that is selected or continuously modified in order to minimize the amplitude of the measured vibration.
Naturally, the present invention is capable of numerous variations as to its implementation. Although several embodiments are described above, it will readily be understood that it is not conceivable to identify all possible embodiments in exhaustive manner. Naturally, it is possible to envisage replacing any of the means described by equivalent means without thereby going beyond the ambit of the present invention.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10167079, | Oct 01 2014 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Main rotor rotational speed control for rotorcraft |
10400851, | Oct 01 2014 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Tip clearance measurement of a rotary wing aircraft |
10443674, | Oct 01 2014 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Noise modes for rotary wing aircraft |
10443675, | Oct 01 2014 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Active vibration control of a rotorcraft |
10527123, | Oct 01 2014 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Rotorcraft footprint |
10619698, | Oct 01 2014 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Lift offset control of a rotary wing aircraft |
10654565, | Oct 01 2014 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Collective to elevator mixing of a rotary wing aircraft |
10717521, | Oct 01 2014 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Hub separation in dual rotor rotary wing aircraft |
10822076, | Oct 01 2014 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Dual rotor, rotary wing aircraft |
11021241, | Oct 01 2014 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Dual rotor, rotary wing aircraft |
11040770, | Oct 01 2014 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Single collective stick for a rotary wing aircraft |
11440650, | Oct 01 2014 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Independent control for upper and lower rotor of a rotary wing aircraft |
8061962, | Jan 30 2008 | Airbus Helicopters | Method of optimizing a ducted anti-torque rotor of a rotorcraft, in particular a helicopter, to minimize acoustic annoyance, and a ducted anti-torque rotor obtained thereby |
8583295, | Apr 27 2010 | Airbus Helicopters | Method of controlling and regulating the deflection angle of a tailplane in a hybrid helicopter |
8882024, | Jun 24 2013 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Rotorcraft anti-torque rotor and rudder system |
8960594, | Nov 02 2010 | SKYWORKS GLOBAL INC | Use of auxiliary rudders for yaw control at low speed |
9611037, | Nov 02 2010 | SKYWORKS GLOBAL INC | Use of auxiliary rudders for yaw control at low speed |
9725164, | Dec 10 2013 | Airbus Helicopters | Method for controlling rotorcraft airfoil to minimize auxiliary rotor noise and enhance rotorcraft performance |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2832551, | |||
2985409, | |||
2998210, | |||
3721404, | |||
4213584, | Oct 04 1978 | United Technologies Corporation | Helicopter hover stability and cruise gust effect alleviation |
4462559, | Sep 07 1982 | Means for controlling lateral movement of a helicopter | |
4598887, | Aug 24 1982 | Technische Gerate-u,Entwicklungsgesellschaft m.b.H. | Rotary wing flying craft |
4814764, | Sep 30 1986 | The Boeing Company | Apparatus and method for warning of a high yaw condition in an aircraft |
5072893, | May 28 1987 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft modal suppression system |
5082207, | Feb 04 1985 | Rockwell International Corporation | Active flexible wing aircraft control system |
5108044, | Apr 11 1991 | United Technologies Corporation | Shroud-fin integration shelf for a helicopter empennage structure |
5224667, | Jan 29 1991 | Airbus Operations SAS | System enabling the flutter behavior of an aircraft to be improved |
5316240, | Sep 28 1991 | Aerospatiale Societe Nationale Industrielle | Method and device for filtering the vibratory excitations transmitted between two parts especially between the rotor and the fuselage of a helicopter |
5375794, | Sep 24 1990 | The Boeing Company | Apparatus and method for reducing aircraft loads resulting from atmospheric turbulence and gusts |
5388785, | Apr 14 1992 | Societe Anonyme Dite: Eurocopter France | Single-rotor helicopter having a compound anti-torque system, and a method of countering the torque induced by said single rotor |
5669582, | May 12 1995 | The Boeing Company | Method and apparatus for reducing unwanted sideways motion in the aft cabin and roll-yaw upsets of an airplane due to atmospheric turbulence and wind gusts |
5816533, | Jul 27 1995 | Airbus Helicopters | Method and device for reducing the vibration generated on the structure of a helicopter |
5895012, | Apr 04 1996 | Airbus Helicopters | Method and device for reducing the effect of the vibration generated by the driveline of a helicopter |
6416017, | Sep 11 1998 | DaimlerChrysler AG | System and method for compensating structural vibrations of an aircraft caused by outside disturbances |
6915989, | May 01 2002 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft multi-axis modal suppression system |
6986483, | Apr 08 2002 | Airbus Operations SAS | Inertial reference system for an aircraft |
7017857, | Sep 16 2002 | Foster-Miller, Inc | Active vibration control system |
FR2678578, | |||
FR2737181, | |||
FR2747099, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 23 2004 | Eurocopter | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jan 04 2005 | EGLIN, PAUL | Eurocopter | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 015576 | /0540 | |
Jan 07 2014 | Eurocopter | Airbus Helicopters | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 034663 | /0976 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
May 25 2012 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Nov 09 2015 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
May 31 2016 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
May 29 2020 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 09 2011 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 09 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 09 2012 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 09 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 09 2015 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 09 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 09 2016 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 09 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 09 2019 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 09 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 09 2020 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 09 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |