In a hdd, the flush queue (cache) command is transformed into a memory barrier command. The hdd thus has an operation mode in which flush commands do not cause the pending commands to be executed immediately, but instead simply introduces a constraint on the command reordering algorithms that prevents commands sent after the flush command from being executed before commands sent prior to the flush command. The constraint may be applied only on write commands.
|
1. A device for storing data, comprising:
a data storage medium; and
a controller controlling the medium, the controller executing logic comprising:
in response to a flush command to flush a command queue, not immediately executing pending commands in the queue and constraining a command reordering algorithm to prevent non-flush commands received after the flush command from being executed prior to commands received before the flush command, wherein the act of not immediately executing pending commands in the queue and constraining a command reordering algorithm is executed only if a flag indicates a first binary state, the flag assuming the first binary state in response to a flush command, the flag assuming a second binary state when a counter is at zero, wherein the logic comprises incrementing the counter in response to receiving at least one non-flush command only while the flag is in the second binary state and decrementing the counter in response to executing at least one non-flush command.
7. A computer-implemented method executed by a processor accessing a tangible computer readable memory to cause the processor to execute the method, the method comprising:
in the presence of a flush cache command to flush a cache of a hdd, temporarily delaying execution of non-flush cache commands received after the flush cache command is received until commands awaiting execution in the cache and received prior to the flush cache command have been executed, wherein the act of temporarily delaying is executed only if a flag indicates a first binary state, wherein the flag assumes the first binary state in response to a flush command, wherein the flag assumes the second binary state when a counter is at zero, wherein if the flag is in the first binary state and the counter is at zero, the flag is flipped to the second binary state after servicing a command, and if a barrier register is not empty, a next command is executed from the register, and if the next command is a flush command, the flag is flipped to the first binary state, and otherwise the command is processed and the counter incremented.
10. processor executing logic embodied on a computer readable memory, the logic executed by the processor comprising:
receiving a command;
determining whether the command is a write command;
if the command is a write command, determining whether flush cache is active;
if flush cache is active, sending the write command to a barrier data structure, and if flush cache is not active, processing the write command in accordance with cache command processing and incrementing a queue counter;
if the command is not a write command, determining whether the command is a flush command and if it is, determining whether an indication of flush cache is active and if not, indicating that flush cache is active;
sending the flush command to the barrier data structure; and
executing post-command service routine logic including:
in response to determining that a command in the barrier data structure is a write, decrementing the queue counter;
after decrementing the counter or when the command in the barrier data structure is a flush cache command, determining whether flush cache is active;
only if flush cache is active, determining whether the queue counter is at zero and only if it is setting flush cache to inactive;
while flush cache is inactive and the barrier data structure is not empty, executing a DO loop in which a next command from the barrier data structure is extracted and if the next command is a flush cache command, indicating that flush cache is active flag and otherwise, if the next command is not a flush cache command, processing the command and incrementing the queue counter.
3. The device of
5. The device of
9. The method of
|
The present invention relates generally to disk drives.
In hard disk drives and other storage media, there are many applications that require a certain ordering of commands to be respected. An example of this is a journaling file system. In these systems a set of operations is performed in an atomic manner to guarantee that the file system is always in a consistent state. To do this the file system first writes a record of the operations to be performed, then performs the operations, and at the end writes a confirmation to the journal that the operations were completed. In this way, if the system crashes before the confirmation is written, the system knows it has to redo the operations. The problem here is that the queuing (or write cache) will reorder the commands and therefore may write the confirmation to the journal before all commands are completed.
The current solution to this problem is to flush the queue before sending the update write operation to the HDD. The drawback of this solution is that constant flushing of the queue (and/or the cache) adversely affects performance (throughput). The present invention recognizes the need to address this problem without necessarily requiring a new type of queuing infrastructure that could require a new interface to the HDD and consequently would require the file systems to be rewritten.
Having made this critical observation, the invention disclosed herein is provided.
A device for storing data includes a data storage medium and a controller controlling the medium and executing logic. The logic includes, in response to a flush command to flush a command queue, not immediately executing pending commands in the queue. The logic constrains a command reordering algorithm to prevent non-flush commands (such as write commands) that are received after the flush command from being executed prior to commands received before the flush command.
The above-summarized constraint may be implemented only if a flag indicates a first binary state, referred to in non-limiting implementations as a “flush active” state. The flag can assume the first binary state in response to a flush command. Also, the flag may assume the opposite (second) binary state when a counter is at zero. The counter can be incremented in response to receiving a write command while the flag is in the second binary state. The counter can be decremented after executing the write command.
In one non-limiting implementation, if the flag is in the first binary state and the counter is at zero, the flag is flipped to the second binary state after servicing a command. If a barrier register is not empty, a next command is executed from the register. If the next command is a flush command, the flag is flipped to the first binary state, and otherwise the command is processed and the counter incremented.
In another aspect, a hard disk drive (HDD) includes means for indicating whether a flush cache feature is active, and means, responsive for the means for indicating, for sending non-flush commands to a command barrier storage.
In still another aspect, a method is disclosed for managing a command queue. In the presence of a flush cache command to flush a cache of a HDD, execution of non-flush cache commands received after the flush cache command is received is temporarily delayed until commands awaiting execution in the cache and received prior to the flush cache command have been executed.
This solution has the advantage of being applicable to current systems that use the flush command to guarantee consistency. Instead of immediately performing all the pending operations, a memory barrier simply is set, guaranteeing that the journal confirmation write operation is performed after all the write commands in the atomic set are performed. But, at the same time it does not require the HDD to immediately perform all the pending commands and therefore does not degrade performance as much as a true flush command. This is particularly true when the memory barrier is imposed only on the write commands. Performance is thus enhanced without the need for changing current systems.
The details of the present invention, both as to its structure and operation, can best be understood in reference to the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals refer to like parts, and in which:
Referring initially to
The controller 18 may receive input signals at an input/output terminal 20 from a host computer 22. The data input interface may be, in the case of hard disk drive implementations, serial ATA. The input signals may include read and write requests from the host computer 22. A data input and output path 24 which includes servo components 26 is provided between the controller 18 and the storage medium 12.
Moreover, the command preprocessing routine 32 can flip the binary state of a flag 36, referred to herein as a “flush active” flag. The preprocessing routine 32 may also increment a counter 38, referred to herein as a “numWritesInQueueOrCache” counter, in accordance with disclosure below. A post command service routine 40, described further in reference to
It is to be understood that in some implementations, the invention described below can be enabled or disabled by appropriately setting a binary flag, which might be termed a “use command barrier” flag. If the flag is in one state, flush cache commands are executed in accordance with conventional principles, but flipping the flag enables the present invention to be enabled.
Now referring to
If the test at decision diamond 44 is positive, the logic flows to decision diamond 46 to determine whether the flush active flag shown in
In contrast, when it is determined at decision diamond 44 that the command is not a write, the logic moves to decision diamond 53 to determine if the command is a flush. If it is a flush command, the logic flows to decision diamond 54 to determine whether the flush active flag indicates the false state, and if so the flag is flipped to “true” at block 56. The flush command is then sent to the write barrier FIFO at block 58. In contrast, when it is determined at decision diamond 54 that the flush active flag is not “false” the logic flows directly to block 58. Returning to decision diamond 53, as shown when it is determined at decision diamond 53 that the command is not a flush, the command is processed normally at block 60.
Now referring to
While the particular TRANSFORMING FLUSH QUEUE COMMAND TO MEMORY BARRIER COMMAND IN DISK DRIVE as herein shown and described in detail is fully capable of attaining the above-described objects of the invention, it is to be understood that it is the presently preferred embodiment of the present invention and is thus representative of the subject matter which is broadly contemplated by the present invention, that the scope of the present invention fully encompasses other embodiments which may become obvious to those skilled in the art, and that the scope of the present invention is accordingly to be limited by nothing other than the appended claims, in which reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless explicitly so stated, but rather “one or more”. Moreover, it is not necessary for a device or method to address each and every problem sought to be solved by the present invention, for it to be encompassed by the present claims. Furthermore, no element, component, or method step in the present disclosure is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether the element, component, or method step is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element herein is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. §112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or, in the case of a method claim, the element is recited as a “step” instead of an “act”. Absent express definitions herein, claim terms are to be given all ordinary and accustomed meanings that are not irreconciliable with the present specification and file history.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10162534, | Apr 07 2014 | Western Digital Technologies, Inc. | Ordering commitment of data from a data cache to nonvolatile memory using ordering commands |
11741010, | Jan 12 2018 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Storage device storing data in order based on barrier command |
11861216, | Dec 20 2021 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Data recovery using barrier commands |
8606987, | Dec 07 2007 | PHISON ELECTRONICS CORP. | Data writing method for flash memory and controller using the same |
8904160, | Nov 02 2009 | Wistron Corporation | Electronic device which automatically sets up multiple operating systems for a test system by generating an emptied boot record status and loading a target operating system according to the emptied boot record status |
9412455, | Sep 11 2013 | Kioxia Corporation | Data write control device and data storage device |
9632711, | Apr 07 2014 | Western Digital Technologies, INC | Processing flush requests by utilizing storage system write notifications |
9645752, | Apr 07 2014 | Western Digital Technologies, INC | Identification of data committed to non-volatile memory by use of notification commands |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5990913, | Jul 30 1997 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for implementing a flush command for an accelerated graphics port device |
6038646, | Jan 23 1998 | Oracle America, Inc | Method and apparatus for enforcing ordered execution of reads and writes across a memory interface |
6378037, | Jun 29 1999 | TWITTER, INC | Write-twice method of fail-safe write caching |
6609192, | Jun 06 2000 | GOOGLE LLC | System and method for asynchronously overlapping storage barrier operations with old and new storage operations |
6895482, | Sep 10 1999 | International Business Machines Corporation | Reordering and flushing commands in a computer memory subsystem |
7353301, | Oct 29 2004 | TAHOE RESEARCH, LTD | Methodology and apparatus for implementing write combining |
20040128470, | |||
20050080981, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 12 2006 | DE SOUZA, JORGE CAMPELLO | HITACHI GLOBAL STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES NETHERLANDS B V | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 017295 | /0742 | |
Jan 13 2006 | Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands B.V. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jul 23 2012 | HITACHI GLOBAL STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES NETHERLANDS B V | HGST NETHERLANDS B V | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 029341 | /0777 | |
Aug 31 2016 | HGST NETHERLANDS B V | Western Digital Technologies, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 040821 | /0550 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jul 22 2009 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Jan 30 2013 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 24 2017 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Sep 11 2017 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 11 2012 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Feb 11 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 11 2013 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 11 2015 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 11 2016 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Feb 11 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 11 2017 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 11 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 11 2020 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Feb 11 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 11 2021 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 11 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |