A method for improving the precision of time domain low field H-NMR analysis, the method comprising rotating a sample within a rf coil and acquiring multiple time domain signals for the sample at multiple orientations within the rf coil.
|
9. A method for improving the precision of time domain low field H-NMR analysis, the method comprising: rotating a sample within a rf coil at a rotation rate of about 15 revolutions per minute while continuously acquiring multiple time domain signals for the sample over data acquisition windows having a duration of about 40 μsecs with a delay of about 25 seconds after acquiring the time domain signal before acquiring a subsequent time domain signal.
3. A method for improving the precision of time domain low field H-NMR analysis, the method comprising
rotating a sample within a rf coil while continuously acquiring multiple time domain signals for the sample at multiple orientations within the rf coil;
rotating one or more standards within the rf coil, acquiring multiple time domain signals for the one or more standards at multiple orientations within the rf coil, and producing an average time domain signal for the one or more standards; and
determining the hydrogen content of the sample by comparing the intensity of the average time domain signal for the sample to the intensity of the average time domain signal for the one or more standards.
5. A method for improving the precision of time domain low field H-NMR analysis, the method comprising
rotating a sample within a rf coil at a rotation rate of 1° or less per data acquisition window while continuously acquiring multiple time domain signals for the sample at multiple orientations within the rf coil
rotating one or more standards within a rf coil, acquiring multiple time domain signals for the one or more standards at multiple orientations within the rf coil, and producing an average time domain signal for the one or more standards; and,
determining the hydrogen content of the sample by comparing the intensity of the average time domain signal for the sample to the intensity of the average time domain signal for the one or more standards.
1. A method for improving the precision of time domain low field H-NMR analysis, the method comprising
rotating a sample within a rf coil and acquiring multiple time domain signals for the sample at multiple orientations within the rf coil and averaging the multiple time domain signals for the sample, producing an average time domain signal for the sample;
rotating one or more standards within the rf coil, acquiring multiple time domain signals for the one or more standards at multiple orientations within the rf coil, and producing an average time domain signal for the one or more standards;
determining the hydrogen content of the sample by comparing the intensity of the average time domain signal for the sample to the intensity of the average time domain signal for the one or more standards.
2. The method of
4. The method of
8. The method of
10. The method of
rotating one or more standards within a rf coil, acquiring multiple time domain signals for the one or more standards at multiple orientations within the rf coil, and producing an average time domain signal for the one or more standards; and,
determining the hydrogen content of the sample by comparing the intensity of the average time domain signal for the sample to the intensity of the average time domain signal for the one or more standards.
11. The method of
12. The method of
|
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 60/821,792 filed Aug. 8, 2006.
The present application is directed to a method for improving the precision of time domain low field H-NMR analysis.
Time domain low field H-NMR analysis determines the quantity of hydrogen in a sample. In a typical time domain low field H-NMR analysis, a sample is inserted into a H-NMR instrument and subjected to a static polarizing magnetic field and to one or more radio frequency (RF) fields that are generated by a RF coil. The period of RF excitation typically lasts several microseconds and is known as the RF pulse. Following the RF pulse, a H-NMR signal is acquired. The H-NMR signal is generated in the RF coil. The hydrogen content of the sample is determined by comparing the intensity of the acquired H-NMR signal to a signal from one or more standards.
Typically, multiple scans for a given sample are acquired and co-averaged to improve signal to noise. The delay between acquired scans is known as the relaxation delay time and is on the order of several seconds. Ideally, one would acquire the first data point following the RF pulse from the H-NMR signal. However, it is typical to acquire data over a small sampling window, known as the data acquisition window.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,701,705 describes a low field H-NMR apparatus for conducting NMR moisture measurements. In the apparatus, a NMR apparatus 15 cooperates with a static pipe 12 or other belt or conveyer system. A flowing material passes along the static pipe. A pulse is transmitted to the coil from the NMR apparatus 15 and an output is formed which is the transient NMR response. The output signal is applied to a peak signal detector 20. The peak signal detector and the output signal are both input to a CPU 22. The output signal is first passed through a digitizer 24 which converts the analog signal into a series of digital words. The CPU collaborates with a memory 26, and periodically forms an output which is an indication of moisture. The indicator 28 provides data which typically is expressed in the form of percentage moisture content.
In FIG. 2 of U.S. Pat. No. 4,701,705, the ordinate is the transient NMR response measured in volts. Several curves extend through about 50 microseconds. A peak first occurs (at about 5 to 7 microseconds on the graph) and decay is thereafter noted. U.S. Pat. No. 4,701,705 does not describe a method for minimizing inaccuracies which may result from assymmetry of the sample flowing through the pipe 12.
Some patents describe rotating a sample about an axis that is subtantially perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field in the gap. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,184,078 describes the use of an O-ring to couple the test tube to a motor. The motor can then be controlled to rotate the test tube at a desired speed. However, the system described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,184,078 is used to perform high field NMR. See col. 4, 11. 47-col. 5, 1. 10.
A sample is spun during high field NMR in order to reduce the effect of the inherent inhomogeneity in the static magnetic field to which the sample is exposed. In solid state high field NMR analysis, the sample also is spun in order to reduce or eliminate the effects of the inherent anisotropies of internal magnetic interactions which are typically averaged out in liquids but contribute to severe loss of spectral resolution in solids. The data acquired during sample spinning is then Fourier transformed to produce highly resolved peaks. The higher the peak resolution, the more accurate and complete is the identification and quantification of chemical structures present in the sample.
In high field NMR, the spinning period typically is shorter than the data acquisition window. In other words, the sample undergoes many rotations over the typical data acquisition window. So, in high field NMR the spinning is done in such a way as to allow all parts of the sample to experience many different orientations within the data acquisition window in such a way that all parts of the sample experience, on average, the same local field. One thus obtains NMR spectra with optimally narrowed lineshapes.
Low field NMR is not concerned with lineshapes because it does not involve a frequency domain spectrum and does not attempt to resolve spectral features. Methods are needed to improving the precision of hydrogen content determination when using time domain low field H-NMR analysis.
The present application provides a method for improving the precision of time domain low field H-NMR analysis, the method comprising rotating a sample within a RF coil and acquiring multiple time domain signals for the sample at multiple orientations within the RF coil.
The present application also provides a method for improving the precision of time domain low field H-NMR analysis, the method comprising rotating a sample within a RF coil while continuously acquiring multiple time domain signals for the sample at multiple orientations within the RF coil.
In one embodiment, the application provides a method for improving the precision of time domain low field H-NMR analysis, the method comprising: rotating a sample within the RF coil at a rotation rate of 1° or less per data acquisition window while continuously acquiring multiple time domain signals for the sample at multiple orientations within the RF coil.
In one embodiment, the application provides a method for improving the precision of time domain low field H-NMR analysis, the method comprising: rotating a sample within a RF coil at a rotation rate of about 15 revolutions per minute while continuously acquiring multiple time domain signals for the sample over data acquisition windows having a duration of about 40 μsecs.
Some time domain low field H-NMR instruments use RF coil designs with inherent axial asymmetry. An example is a loop gap RF coil. The use of an inherently asymmetric RF coil minimizes variations in tuning from sample to sample. However, if the sample has a non-uniform proton density and/or if the sample is positioned slightly off center inside the RF coil, the inherently asymmetric RF coil also may produce H-NMR signals for the same sample which have different intensities at different sample orientations in the RF coil.
A sample may have an inherently asymmetric hydrogen density for a number of reasons. For example, the sample tube may vary in size, shape, and/or wall thickness along its length and/or its diameter. The tube may be placed slightly off axis inside the RF coil. The sample itself may have a non-uniform hydrogen content. An example would be if the sample is a solid or a heterogeneous emulsion. The sample may also be subject to a temperature gradient.
The present application provides a method for improving the precision of time domain low field H-NMR analysis comprising rotating a sample within a RF coil and acquiring multiple time domain signals for the sample at multiple orientations within the RF coil. In one embodiment, one or more standards also are rotated within the RF coil and multiple time domain signals are acquired for the one or more standards at multiple orientations within the RF coil.
The multiple time domain signals for the sample and for the one or more standards, respectively, are co-added and averaged, producing an average time domain signal for the sample and an average time domain signal for the one or more standards. The hydrogen content of the sample is determined by comparing the intensity of the average time domain signal for the sample with the intensity of the average time domain signal for the one or more standards. The method improves the precision and ultimately the accuracy of the hydrogen content determination for the sample. The improvement is particularly evident where the hydrogen distribution in the sample is inherently asymmetric. The hydrogen distribution in the sample may be inherently asymmetric, for example, where the sample is positioned slightly off center, and/or where the sample is subjected to a temperature gradient which causes a non-axially symmetric magnetization profile.
The reason for rotating the sample during time domain low field H-NMR analysis is different from the reason for sample spinning at high speeds using high field NMR instruments. As explained above, in liquid state high field NMR analysis, the sample is spun in order to reduce the effect of the inherent inhomogeneity in the static magnetic field to which the sample is exposed. In solid state high field NMR analysis, the sample also is spun in order to reduce or eliminate the effects of the inherent anisotropies of internal magnetic interactions which are typically averaged out in liquids but contribute to severe loss of spectral resolution in solids. The data acquired during sample spinning is then Fourier transformed to produce highly resolved peaks. The higher the peak resolution, the more accurate and complete is the identification and quantification of chemical structures present in the sample.
In contrast, the reason for rotating the sample during time domain low field H-NMR analysis is to minimize signal intensity variations due to inherent asymmetries in RF coil design. The more repeatable and precise the intensity of the H-NMR time domain signal, the more accurate the ultimate hydrogen content determination following proper calibration against known standards.
The H-NMR signals are acquired over a period of time called the data acquisition window. In high field NMR, the spinning period typically is shorter than the data acquisition window. In other words, the sample undergoes many rotations over the typical data acquisition window. So, in high field NMR the spinning is done in such a way as to allow all parts of the sample to experience many different orientations within the data acquisition window in such a way that all parts of the sample experience, on average, the same local field. One thus obtains NMR spectra with optimally narrowed lineshapes.
In low field time domain H-NMR, the rotation period is longer than the data acquisition window. In other words, the sample does not rotate significantly during the data acquisition window. The low rate of rotation avoids fluctuation in the H-NMR signal as data is acquired during the data acquisition window. Low field NMR is not concerned with lineshapes because it does not involve a frequency domain spectrum and does not attempt to resolve spectral features.
Low field H-NMR attempts to minimize the dependence of the time domain total hydrogen signal on sample orientation. The need to minimize such dependence arises from RF coil asymmetric design coupled with sample asymmetric proton distribution and/or slight off centering of the vial in the RF probe. In low field H-NMR, the rotation is very slow so that the sample barely reorients itself during the data acquisition window. This guarantees that the time domain signal acquired during the data acquisition window is constant albeit different for different orientations. Co-adding and averaging the time domain signals from different orientations minimizes orientational effects.
In quantitative terms, if “AT” is the data acquisition window, or time, and “P” is the period of the applied rotation, then the following equation applies:
360·AT/P≦1°
Where AT equals 40 microseconds, the period P of the motion is greater than or equal to 0.0144 sec and the spinning rate (1/P) is equal to or less than 4167 RPM (revolutions per minute). In one embodiment, the spinning rate is less than 4167 RPM.
In one embodiment, the rotation rate and the data acquisition window are controlled to produce a rotation of 1° or less per data acquisition window. In an advantageous embodiment, the rotation rate and the data acquisition window produce a rotation of 0.1° or less per data acquisition window. In an advantageous embodiment, the rotation rate and the data acquisition window produce a rotation of 0.01° or less per data acquisition window.
In one embodiment, the rotation rate is about 20 revolutions per minute (RPM) or less. In one embodiment, the rotation rate is about 17 revolutions per minute (RPM) or less. In one embodiment, the rotation rate is about 15 revolutions per minute (RPM) or less. In one embodiment, the rotation rate is about 5 revolutions per minute (RPM) or more. In one embodiment, the rotation rate is about 10 revolutions per minute (RPM) or more. In one embodiment, the rotation rate is about 12 revolutions per minute (RPM) or more. In one embodiment, the rotation rate is about 15 revolutions per minute (RPM).
In order to improve the signal to noise ratio, and to reduce variations associated with orientational effects due to asymmetric coil response, it is advantageous to average multiple time domain signals for multiple orientations. The number of scans taken is not critical, and substantially any suitable number of scans may be taken as long as signal to noise ratio is acceptable. Typically, from about 10 to about 20 time domain signals are acquired per sample. In one embodiment, about 16 time domain signals are acquired per sample using a data acquisition window of about 40 μsec with a delay of about 25 seconds between scans. In this embodiment, the total experimental time per sample is 400 sec.
In an advantageous embodiment, the sample is continuously rotated at about 15 rpm, and the duration of the data acquisition window is about 40 μsec with a delay of about 25 seconds between scans. In this embodiment, about 1/100,000th (0.00001 or 1×10−5) of a revolution occurs during the data acquisition window.
The sample is rotated in the RF coil using any suitable method. The sample may be manually placed in the RF coil at multiple orientations and H-NMR signals acquired at each orientation. The sample also may be mechanically rotated to multiple orientations and H-NMR signals acquired at multiple orientations during the rotation.
In an advantageous embodiment, a low field time domain H-NMR instrument is associated with an energy source to provide continuous, relatively low RPM rotation of the sample in the RF coil. Any suitable energy source may be used to rotate the sample. For example, a suitable energy source is a low RPM motor.
In the examples, the shaft of a Pittman model GM9413G607 with 65.5:1 gear ratio operated at 5V DC was mechanically associated with sample vials in a Bruker Minispec MQ20 NMR Analyzer obtained from Bruker Optics, Inc.
The simplified illustrations of
For present purposes, the basic representation of an H-NMR spectroscopy instrument 100 in
The RF coil 114 represented in
As previously described, the present low field H-NMR method is particularly directed to H-NMR measurement techniques that employ RF coils which are inherently axially asymmetric. These include RF coils such as the loop gap resonator 114 depicted in
Commercially available H-NMR instruments are typically equipped with a sampling tube that extends downward into the sample field and in front of the loop gap resonator (or other RF coil). The sample to be measured is held near the bottom of the sampling tube in front of and generally in alignment with the loop gap resonator. As already discussed, this measurement configuration will generally provide variations in the H-NMR signals received from the sample, due to the inherent axial asymmetry of the RF coil and/or the other reasons previously discussed.
In the present embodiment, the H-NMR spectroscopy instrument 100 is equipped with a sample holder assembly 120 that provides, in one respect, an advantageous replacement for the prior art sample tube. The sample holder assembly 120 includes a dual-section shaft having a first section 126 detachably coupled with a DC motor 128 and a second section 130 that retains a sample container 132, such as a sample vial. In one embodiment, the first section 126 is a wood shaft 126 that is sized to accommodate the distance between the motor 128 and a top wall 134 of the instrument housing 110 and to transmit torque provided by the motor 128. A top or proximal end of the first section 126 is preferably detachably coupled to a shaft of the motor 128 by way of a flexible tubing connection 136 or the like. The second section 130 is preferably a plastic guide rod 130 that extends into the H-NMR housing 110. The guide rod 130 may be formed from any material having sufficient strength to handle torque and for supporting the sample container 132. The guide rod material is also advantageously a material that is not responsive or reactive to H-NMR measuring conditions. A flexible tube joint 152 is provided to couple the wood shaft 126 and guide rod 130 together, and provide for easy detachment of one section from the other section. Preferably, the joint 152 is positioned sufficiently clear of the top wall 134, so that the guide rod 130 can be readily uncoupled and be pulled from the housing 110 by handling a section of the rod 130 initially above the top wall 134.
Furthermore, it is preferred that the DC motor 128 is positioned well away from the housing 110, so that it is not affected by H-NMR measurement conditions. The DC motor 128 is, therefore, provided on a permanent support 142 well above the top wall 134. For the operation required by the present low-field H-NMR method, the DC motor may be of any design capable of low rotational speeds and continuous operation. It is further contemplated that any other suitable power source capable of providing the same automated operation may be used, if integration of such a power source can be done economically and efficiently.
Referring specifically to
In an operating mode, as shown in
The method has the advantage that it is not necessary to spend thousands of dollars on equipment required to spin the sample at a very high rate, as is necessary in high field NMR analysis. Even if the low field NMR instrument is modified to provide rotation, the required rotation rate of the sample is very low. The motor or other actuator required to induce rotation is relatively inexpensive. As a result, the precision of the hydrogen content of the sample may be significantly improved with a minor and relatively low cost modification of a standard low field unit.
The invention will be better understood with reference to the following examples, which are illustrative only:
A vial filled with a heavy gas oil sample was mounted, off-axis, in the coil of a Bruker Minispec MQ20 NMR Analyzer. The vial was maintained off center in order to exaggerate the effects of the non-axial symmetry of the proton density inside the coil. The sample was manually placed in the coil at four different orientations (referred to as 0, 90, 180 and 270, in the table below). The data acquisition window was set at 40 μsec per scan and 16 scans were collected with a 25 second delay between successive scans. For each static “off-axis” orientation, the time domain signal at the various orientations, the time domain average, and the standard deviation and % standard deviation are shown below:
Off Center Vial
NMR Signal
Location 0
13.6492
Location 90
11.8655
Location 180
14.0239
Location 270
15.9404
Average
13.8698
Standard Deviation
1.6710
% Standard Deviation
12.0480
Relatively large variability in the NMR signals was seen depending upon the orientation of the sample in the instrument.
The vial from the comparative example was run off-center four times under mechanical rotation using the Bruker analyzer connected to the shaft of the low RPM motor. The rotation rate was 15 revolutions per minute. Each run was initiated at a different starting orientation. The data acquisition window was set at 40 μsec per scan and 16 scans were collected with a 25 second delay between successive scans.
The rotation was slow compared to the data sampling window and thus the sample was essentially “static” during each scan. Over the 16 scans, the vial rotated roughly 100 revolutions. Time domain signals were acquired for four different starting positions of the sample. The results are shown in the following Table:
Off Center Vial Rotated
NMR Signal
Rotation 1
13.9220
Rotation 2
13.8273
Rotation 3
14.0991
Rotation 4
13.8481
Average
13.9241
Standard Deviation
0.1235
% Standard Deviation
0.8871
A significant improvement in the % Standard Deviation was seen even in the off center vial when the sample in the comparative example was rotated. Rotation of the off center sample decreased the standard deviation by roughly a factor of ten (from about 12% to 1%).
A second sample-filled vial was properly centered in the RF coil at different orientations, designated “0, 90, 180, and 270.” The results are shown in the following Table:
On Center Vial Static
NMR Signal
Location 0
70.6312
Location 90
70.6732
Location 180
70.4163
Location 270
70.7852
Average
70.6265
Standard Deviation
0.1545
% Standard Deviation
0.2187
Proper centering reduced the variability of the NMR signals, as seen by the % standard deviation of 0.2187. This was expected since proper on axis centering greatly reduces the asymmetry in the hydrogen distribution as viewed by the inherently non axially symmetric RF loop gap resonator coil.
Example 2 was repeated, but the sample was rotated as in Example 1. The results are shown in the following Table:
On Center Vial Rotated
NMR Signal
Rotation 1
70.6159
Rotation 2
70.6435
Rotation 3
70.6406
Rotation 4
70.6543
Average
70.6386
Standard Deviation
0.0162
% Standard Deviation
0.0230
Rotation of the centered vial of Example 2 produced a factor of 10 improvement in % standard deviation.
Persons of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that many modifications may be made to the foregoing description. The embodiments described herein are meant to be illustrative only and should not be taken as limiting the invention, which will be defined in the claims.
Tutunjian, Pierre Nazareth, Smith, Thomas Riddel
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4453147, | Mar 25 1982 | Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc. | Modular lumped circuit resonator |
5184078, | Mar 08 1991 | FOXBORO NMR, LTD | Apparatus for rotating an NMR test tube |
5194811, | Aug 02 1990 | Fox Chase Cancer Center | Radio frequency volume resonator for nuclear magnetic resonance |
5212450, | Oct 25 1990 | Fox Chase Cancer Center | Radio frequency volume resonator for nuclear magnetic resonance |
5258710, | Mar 27 1992 | General Electric Company | Cryogenic probe for NMR microscopy |
5371464, | Mar 08 1991 | QUALION LTD | Apparatus for in-line analysis of flowing liquid and solid materials by nuclear magnetic resonance |
5424644, | Jun 25 1993 | Bruker Analytische Messtechnik GmbH | Probehead for the measuring of magnetic resonance |
5886525, | Mar 17 1997 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy; NAVY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY | Apparatus and method for performing NMR spectroscopy on solid sample by rotation |
6583622, | Apr 18 1998 | Institute of Food Research | NMR field-cycling spectrometer in which the sample is conveyed on a circular path at a predetermined angular velocity |
6941018, | Mar 23 2001 | GLORY LTD | Method of and apparatus for searching corresponding points between images, and computer program |
6984980, | Feb 14 2002 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for NMR sensor with loop-gap resonator |
7199581, | May 16 2003 | Bruker Biospin GmbH | Magnetic resonance measuring system determining the mass of samples in a production line with monitored drift compensation |
7352179, | Oct 29 2004 | GREEN IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Methods and apparatus for measuring capillary pressure in a sample |
20080174309, | |||
20090146658, | |||
20090149736, | |||
DE102004050737, | |||
WO3102615, | |||
WO2004104600, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Aug 06 2007 | Shell Oil Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Aug 09 2007 | SMITH, THOMAS RIDDELL | Shell Oil Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019912 | /0494 | |
Aug 13 2007 | TUTUNJIAN, PIERRE NAZARETH | Shell Oil Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019912 | /0494 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 13 2013 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Feb 02 2014 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Feb 02 2013 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Aug 02 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 02 2014 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Feb 02 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Feb 02 2017 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Aug 02 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 02 2018 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Feb 02 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Feb 02 2021 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Aug 02 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 02 2022 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Feb 02 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |