The present invention relates to a process for converting fischer-Tropsch wax to high quality lube basestocks using a molecular sieve beta catalyst followed by a unidimensional intermediate pore molecular sieve with near circular pore structures having an average diameter of 0.50 nm to 0.65 nm wherein the difference between the maximum diameter and the minimum is ≦0.05 nm. Both catalysts comprise one or more group VIII metals. For example, a cascaded two-bed catalyst system consisting of a first bed Pt/beta catalyst followed by a second bed Pt/ZSM-48 catalyst is highly selective for wax isomerization and lube hydrodewaxing with minimal gas formation.

Patent
   7704379
Priority
Oct 08 2002
Filed
Oct 08 2002
Issued
Apr 27 2010
Expiry
Aug 25 2024
Extension
687 days
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
1
104
EXPIRED
1. A process for converting a fischer-Tropsch wax having at least about 95% n-paraffins to an isoparaffinic lube basestock, consisting of:
first, passing the fischer-Tropsch wax and a hydrogen co-feed over a first catalyst selected from the group consisting of a beta catalyst consisting of a Zeolite beta and one or more group VIII metals, to form an intermediate product; and
second, passing the intermediate product over a second catalyst selected from the group consisting of a unidimensional molecular sieve catalyst consisting of a ZSM-48 unidimensional intermediate pore molecular sieve and one or more group VIII metals;
to form the isoparaffinic lube basestock in a yield which is about 10% higher at a given pour point than that obtained using the unidimensional molecular sieve alone or obtained using the unidimensional molecular sieve catalyst first and the beta catalyst second.
2. A process according to claim 1, wherein
the beta catalyst is kept at a temperature of 400 to 700° F. (204 to 371° C.);
the unidimensional molecular sieve catalyst is kept at a temperature of 500 to 800° F. (260 to 427° C.);
the wax is passed over the beta catalyst at a feed liquid hourly space velocity of 0.1 to 10 h−1;
the intermediate product is passed over the ZSM-48 unidimensional molecular sieve catalyst at a feed liquid hourly space velocity of 0.1 to 10 h−1; and
the process further comprises less than about 1,500 psig (102 atm) hydrogen, wherein the hydrogen is circulated at 100 to 10,000 scf/bbl (18 to 1780 n.L.L−1).
3. A process according to claim 2, wherein
the beta catalyst is kept at a temperature of 500-600° F. (260 to 316° C.);
the ZSM-48 unidimensional molecular sieve catalyst is kept at a temperature of 600-700° F. (316 to 371° C.);
the wax is passed over the beta catalyst at a feed liquid hourly space velocity of 0.5 to 2 h−1;
the intermediate product is passed over the ZSM-48 unidimensional molecular sieve catalyst at a feed liquid hourly space velocity of 0.5 to 2 h−1; and
the process further comprises less than about 1,500 psig (102 atm) hydrogen, wherein the hydrogen is circulated at 1,000 to 6,000 scf/bbl (178 to 1068 n.L.L−1).
4. A process according to claim 3, wherein the group VIII metal on said catalysts is at least one member selected from the group consisting of Pt and Pd; and the unidimensional molecular sieve catalyst is ZSM-48 with a Alpha value of 10 to 50.
5. A process according to claim 1, 2, 3 or 4, wherein
the Zeolite beta has an Alpha value less than about 15 prior to loading with the group VIII metal;
the Zeolite beta is loaded with about 0.5 wt % to about 1 wt % of the group VIII metal, based on the total weight of the Zeolite beta;
the ZSM-48 is loaded with about 0.5 wt % to about 1 wt % of the group VIII metal, based on the total weight of the ZSM-48; and
the group VIII metal is at least one member selected from the group consisting of Pt and Pd.
6. A process according to claim 5, wherein
the beta catalyst is Pt/beta; and
the Pt/ZSM-48 and the Pt/beta are in a cascaded two-bed catalyst system comprising a first bed followed by a second bed, wherein the first bed comprises the Pt/beta catalyst and the second bed comprises the Pt/ZSM-48 catalyst.
7. A process according to claim 6, wherein
the temperature of the first bed and the temperature of the second bed are controlled independently; and
the intermediate product is cascaded directly to the second bed.
8. The process of claim 1 wherein the isoparaffinic lube base stock has a pour point of −12 to −21° C.

The present invention relates to a process for converting Fischer-Tropsch wax to lube basestocks. More particularly, the present invention relates to converting Fischer-Tropsch waxes to lubes using a dual molecular sieve catalysts system.

There is significant economic incentive to convert Fischer-Tropsch (F-T) wax to high quality lube basestocks, especially base oils with properties and performance comparable to, or better than, those of polyalphaolefins (PAO). The upgrading of Fischer-Tropsch wax greatly relies on advanced wax isomerization technology that transforms linear paraffins to multi-branched isoparaffins with minimal cracking.

Processes for converting Fischer-Tropsch wax to paraffinic lube base-stocks are known. A typical process is a two-stage process that hydroisomerizes Fischer-Tropsch wax to a waxy isoparaffins mixture in the first step, followed by either solvent dewaxing or catalytic dewaxing the waxy isoparaffins mixture in the second step to remove residual wax and achieve a target lube pour point.

The hydroisomerization catalysts disclosed previously, such as Pt supported on amorphous aluminosilicate or Zeolite Beta (Beta), normally possess large pores that allow the formation of branch structures during paraffin isomerization. Examples of other large pore molecular sieves include ZSM-3, ZSM-12, ZSM-20, MCM-37, MCM-68, ECR-5, SAPO-5, SAPO-37 and USY. However, these large pore catalysts are not selective enough to preferentially convert normal and lightly branched paraffin waxes in the presence of multi-branched isoparaffin molecules. As a result, the isoparaffin products derived from Fischer-Tropsch wax often contain residual wax that needs to be dewaxed in order to meet target lube cloud points or pour points. The cloud point of a lube is the temperature at which the first trace of wax stalls to separate, causing the lube to become turbid or cloudy (e.g., ASTM D2500). The pour point of a lube is the temperature at which lube and wax crystallize together as a whole and will not flow when poured (e.g., ASTM D97). Dewaxing can be achieved by additionally using either a solvent dewaxing process or a catalytic dewaxing process.

Most selective dewaxing catalysts used in a catalytic dewaxing process have relatively small pore structures and catalyze lube pour point reduction by selectively cracking normal and lightly branched paraffin waxes. Such dewaxing catalysts usually have low paraffin isomerization selectivity.

Few catalysts have been reported to be efficient in catalyzing both hydroisomerization and dewaxing of paraffin wax to low pour point lubes. One example of such catalysts is a noble metal, such as Pt, supported on SAPO-11. It was previously assumed that oval-shaped pore structures are common feature of isomerization and dewaxing catalysts. See, for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,246,566.

There remains a need therefore and a higher isomerization selectivity to achieve a low enough pour point with minimal molecular weight changes.

The present invention relates to a process for converting Fischer-Tropsch wax to high quality lube basestocks by contacting the wax with a molecular sieve catalyst (e.g., Zeolite Beta) followed by a unidimensional molecular sieve catalyst with a near circular pore structure having an average diameter of 0.50 nm to 0.65 nm wherein the difference between the maximum diameter and the minimum is ≦0.05 nm (e.g., ZSM-48). Both catalysts comprise one or more Group VIII metals (i.e., Fe, Ru, Os, Co, Rh, Ir, Pd, Pt, Ni).

FIG. 1 is a plot of hydroisomerization yields versus lube pour point for lubes derived from SASOL™ C80 Fischer-Tropsch wax (C80) treated over Pt/Beta followed by Pt/ZSM-48.

FIG. 2 is a plot of lube yield versus lube pour point for isomerization of C80 wax over Pt/Beta followed by Pt/ZSM-48, Pt/ZSM-48 followed by Pt/Beta, and stand-alone Pt/ZSM-48 catalyst systems.

FIG. 3 is a plot of lube viscosity versus lube pour point for isomerization of C80 wax over Pt/Beta followed by Pt/ZSM-48, Pt/ZSM-48 followed by Pt/Beta, and stand-alone Pt/ZSM-48 catalyst systems.

FIG. 4 is a plot of viscosity index (VI) versus lube pour point for isomerization of C80 wax over Pt/Beta followed by Pt/ZSM-48, Pt/ZSM-48 followed by Pt/Beta, and stand-alone Pt/ZSM-48 catalyst systems.

FIG. 5 is a plot of light gas yields versus lube pour point for isomerization of C80 wax over Pt/Beta followed by Pt/ZSM-48, Pt/ZSM-48 followed by Pt/Beta, and stand-alone Pt/ZSM-48 catalyst systems.

FIG. 6 is a plot of naphtha yields versus lube pour point for isomerization of C80 wax over Pt/Beta followed by Pt/ZSM-48, Pt/ZSM-48 followed by Pt/Beta, and stand-alone Pt/ZSM-48 catalyst systems.

FIG. 7 is a plot of diesel yields versus lube pour point for isomerization of C80 wax over Pt/Beta followed by Pt/ZSM-48, Pt/ZSM-48 followed by Pt/Beta, and stand-alone Pt/ZSM-48 catalyst systems.

The invention provides high isomerization and dewaxing selectivity of a F-T wax with a molecular sieve catalyst followed by a unidimensional catalyst molecular sieve with near circular pore structure having an average diameter of 0.50-0.65 nm (5.0-6.5 angstroms) wherein the maximum diameter-minimum diameter ≦0.05 nm (0.5 angstroms), to form a lubricant. Group VIII metals on the two catalysts are preferred and platinum is the most preferred. The invention improves lube basestock products and their properties (e.g., pour point, cloud point).

There is a synergy between the two catalysts. It is believed that the first catalyst (e.g., Zeolite Beta) improves yield and pour point by creating the first few branches while the second catalyst (i.e., a unidimensional molecular sieve catalyst) does most of the dewaxing with minimal cracking. This method can easily improve yield of high viscosity index (VI) lubes at a target pour point by 10% over prior methods.

Preferably, F-T wax feed is first passed over a single Zeolite Beta catalyst. The resulting intermediate product is then passed over a unidimensional molecular sieve catalyst to form the final lube. These first and second stages can be separated or preferably are integrated process steps (e.g., cascaded).

Zeolite Beta catalysts are 12 ring acidic silica/alumina zeolites with or without boron (replacing some of the aluminum atoms). Zeolite Y (USY), though less preferred than Beta, is also contemplated in the scope of the invention. Pre-sulfided Zeolite Beta is preferred when some residual sulfur in the product is acceptable.

Zeolite Betas used in the invention preferably have an Alpha value below 15, more preferably below 10, at least prior to metal loading. Alpha is an acidity metric that is an approximate indication of the catalytic cracking activity of the catalyst compared to a standard catalyst. Alpha is a relative rate constant (rate of normal hexane conversion per volume of catalyst per unit time). Alpha is based on the activity of the highly active silica-alumina cracking catalyst taken as an Alpha of 1 in U.S. Pat. No. 3,354,078 (incorporated by reference) and measured at 538° C. as described in the Journal of Catalysis, vol. 4, p. 527 (1965); vol. 6, p. 278 (1966); and vol. 61, p. 395 (1980). The use of Fischer Tropsch waxes and waxy raffinates requires a low Alpha value of the Zeolite Beta catalyst due to minimal nitrogen content in the feeds. In comparison, catalysts with high Alpha values are used for cracking. Alpha values may be reduced by steaming.

The Beta catalyst (e.g., Pt/Beta), when contacting the feed, is most preferably kept at temperatures of 400-700° F. (204-371° C.), more preferably at 500-650° F. (260-343° C.), and most preferably at 520-580° F. (271-304° C.).

The unidimensional molecular sieve catalyst with near-circular pore structures does most of the dewaxing. The pores are smaller than in large pore molecular sieves thereby excluding bulkier (e.g., highly branched) molecules. Unidimentional means that the pores are essentially parallel to each other.

The pores of the second catalyst have an average diameter of 0.50 nm to 0.65 nm wherein the difference between a minimum diameter and a maximum diameter is ≦0.05 nm. The pores may not always have a perfect geometric circular or elliptical cross-section. The minimum diameter and maximum diameter are generally only measurements of an ellipse of an cross-sectional area equal to the cross-sectional area of an average pore. The average pore diameter can be defined by finding the center of the pore cross-section, and measuring the minimum diameter and the maximum diameter across the center, and calculating the average of the two diameters.

The preferred unidimensional molecular sieve catalyst is an intermediate pore molecular sieve catalyst of which the preferred version is ZSM-48. U.S. Pat. No. 5,075,269 describes the procedures for making ZSM-48 and is incorporated by reference herein. ZSM-48 is roughly 65% zeolite crystal and 35% alumina. Of the crystals, at least 90%, preferably at least 95%, and most preferably 98-99% are ideal crystals. The ZSM-48 is preferably in the protonated form though some sodium is acceptable. ZSM-48 is more robust than other catalysts with similar functions. However, ZSM-48 is preferably used with ultraclean feeds such as F-T wax to avoid deactivation.

In the second stage of the process, the unidimensional intermediate pore molecular sieve catalyst (e.g., Pt/ZSM-48) is preferably kept at 500-800° F. (260-427° C.), more preferably at 600-700° F. (316-371° C.), and most preferably at 630-660° F. (332-349° C.). ZSM-48 catalysts used in the invention preferably have an Alpha value of about 10 to about 50 prior to metal loading.

The temperature of each catalyst is preferably controlled independently. Temperature choice partly depends on the feed liquid hourly space velocity of which 0.1-20 h−1 is preferred, 0.5-5 h−1 is more preferred, and 0.5-2 h−1 is most preferred.

The contact time for both catalysts is preferably similar to each other. It is understood that the space velocity can be different. The pressure for both catalysts is preferably similar to each other. Hydrogen cofeed flow rate is 100-10,000 scf/bbl (17.8-1,780 n.L.L−1), more preferably 1,000-6,000 scf/bbl (178-1,068 n.L.L−1), and more preferably 1,500-3,000 scf/bbl (267-534 n.L.L−1).

Each catalyst comprises 0.01-5 wt % of at least one Group VIII metal (i.e., Fe, Ru, Os, Co, Rh, Ir, Pd, Pt, Ni). Platinum and palladium are most preferred. Platinum or palladium blended with each other or other group VIII metals follow in preference. Nickel may also be blended with group VIII precious metals and is included in the scope of the invention whenever group VIII blends, alloys, or mixtures are mentioned. Preferred metal loading on both catalysts are 0.1-1 wt % with approximately 0.6 wt % most preferred.

The feed is preferably F-T wax with a melting point over 50° C., less than 7,000 ppm sulfur, and less than 50 ppm nitrogen. The nitrogen is preferably significantly less than 50 ppm if hydrogen pressure is greater than 500 psig (34 atm).

The feed is converted by the Zeolite Beta catalyst to form an intermediate product which is then preferably passed directly from the Beta catalyst to the unidimensional intermediate pore molecular sieve catalyst. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, a cascaded two-bed catalyst system consisting of a first bed Pt/Beta (i.e., platinum on Zeolite Beta) catalyst followed by a second bed Pt/ZSM-48 catalyst allows a highly selective process for wax isomerization and lube hydrodewaxing with minimal gas formation. In cascading, the intermediate product preferably directly passes from the first bed to the second bed without inter-stage separation. Optionally, light byproducts (e.g., methane, ethane) can be removed between the Beta and unidimensional intermediate pore molecular sieve catalysts.

Feeds usually have at least about 95% n-paraffins and a boiling point distribution of at least 500-1300° F. (260-704° C.). Preferred feed contains C24-C60 with tail having a T5 of about 700° F. (371° C.) and a T95 of about 1100° F. (593° C.) with less than 1,000 ppm and preferably less than 200 ppm sulfur or nitrogen. More branching in feed structures facilitates the present invention and improves its yield. U.S. Pat. No. 6,090,989 describes typical branching indices and is incorporated by reference. The feed is preferably mixed with hydrogen and preheated before contacting it with the Beta catalyst. Preferably, at least 95% of the wax is in liquid form before contacting it with the Beta catalyst.

The preferred measurements, as taught by the specification, are described in this paragraph. Where there are two values, the value in parenthesis are approximate metric conversions of the first value. The weight percent of paraffins may be measured by high-resolution 1H-NMR, for example, by the method described in ASTM standard D5292, in combination with GC-MS. This approach may also be used to determine the weight percentage of unsaturates, alcohols, oxygenates, and other organic components. The iso- to normal-paraffin ratio may be measured by performing gas chromatography (GC) or GC-MS in combination with 13C-NMR. Sulfur may be measured by XRF (X-Ray Fluorescence), as described, for example, in ASTM standard D2622. Nitrogen may be measured by syringe/inlet oxidative combustion with chemiluminescence detection, for example, by the method described in ASTM standard D4629. Aromatics may be measured as described below. As taught by the specification, olefins may be measured by using a Bromine index determined by coulemetric analysis, for example, by using ASTM standard D2710. The weight percent of total oxygen may be measured by neutron activation in combination with high-resolution 1H-NMR. If necessary, the total oxygen content may be placed on a water-free basis by measuring water content. For samples having a water content known to be less than about 200 ppm by weight, one may use known derivitization methods (e.g., by using calcium carbide to form acetylene) followed by GC-MS. For samples having a water content known to be greater than about 200 ppm by weight, one may use the Karl-Fischer method, for example, by the method described in ASTM standard D4928. The total alcohol content may be determined by high-resolution 1H-NMR, and the percentage present primarily as C12-C24 primary alcohols may be determined by GC-MS. Cetane number may be determined by using, for example, ASTM standard D613. The level of aromatics may be determined by using high-resolution 1H-NMR, for example, by using ASTM standard D5292. Dioxygenates are measured by using infrared (IR) absorbance spectroscopy.

Branching characteristics of iso-paraffins may be measured by a combination of high-resolution 13C-NMR and GC with high-resolution MS.

A cascaded two-bed catalyst system consisting of a first stage Pt/Beta catalyst immediately followed by a second stage of Pt/ZSM-48 catalyst is shown to be highly active and selective for F-T wax hydroisomerization and dewaxing. A combination of Pt/ZSM-48 followed by Pt/Beta and stand-alone Pt/ZSM-48 were less effective. The use of the Beta catalyst in front of Pt/ZSM-48 has minimal effects on lube viscosity-pour point or viscosity index-pour point correlation. The isomerization of SASOL™ C80 F-T wax resulted in high lube yield and only small amount of gas over a wide range of processing severity. Detailed preferred operating conditions, material balance data, tube yields and properties are summarized in Table 1. TBP x % indicates temperature below which x wt % of hydrocarbon samples boils. The total product distribution at various processing severity is shown in FIG. 1. Time on stream (TOS) is the time during which the feed contacts the catalyst. IBP is initial boiling point. TBP is terminal boiling point. The best S.I. equivalent of standard cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel of feed (SCF/bbl) is normal liters of hydrogen gas per liter of feed (n.l.l−1. or n.L.L−1 or n.L (gas)/L (feed)). LHSV is defined as liquid hourly space velocity. WHSV is defined as weight hourly space velocity.

TABLE 1
Hydroisomerization of SASOL ™ C80 Fischer-Tropsch Wax Catalyzed by a Cascaded
Pt/Beta Followed by Pt/ZSM-48 (1.0 h−1 LHSV for Each Catalyst)
Run Number 401-
3-34 3-37 3-38 3-41 3-50 3-53 3-55
Time on Stream, Days 47.7 50.7 51.7 56.1 70.1 73.7 77.2
Beta Temperature, ° F. 580 560 540 560 540 520 520
Beta Temperature, ° C. approximate 304 293 282 293 282 271 271
ZSM-48 Temperature, ° F. 630 660 660 640 640 660 650
ZSM-48 Temperature, ° C. approximate 332 349 349 338 338 349 343
Pressure, psig 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
(Pressure, atm) approximate 68 68 68 68 68 68 68
H2 Cofeeding Rate, scf/bbl 5477 5188 5228 4965 5610 5790 5332
(H2 Cofeeding Rate, n.L.L−1) approximate 975 923 931 884 999 1031 949
700° F.+ (371° C.+) Conversion, wt % 22.0 60.9 65.3 28.6 38.2 75.2 48.8
H2 Consumption, scf/bbl 110 392 435 150 211 511 286
(H2 Consumption, n.L.L−1) approximate 18 70 77 27 38 91 51
Product Yield, wt % on Feed
C1—C4 Gas 1.4 5.5 6.0 2.1 2.4 7.7 4.0
C5−330° F. (166° C.) Naphtha 5.5 21.3 24.6 7.3 11.3 27.8 14.0
330-700° F. Diesel (166-371° C.) 15.2 34.8 35.5 19.5 24.9 40.6 31.4
700° F.+ Lube (371° C.+) 78.0 39.1 34.7 71.4 61.8 24.8 51.2
Total Hydrocarbon 100.2 100.7 100.8 100.3 100.4 100.9 100.5
700° F.+ (371° C.+) Lube Properties Feed
KV @ 40° C., cSt 35.0 33.6 35.9 29.7 30.2 25.6 23.5
KV @ 100° C., cSt 9.4 7.20 6.49 6.71 6.32 6.35 5.20 5.16
Viscosity Index 175.5 149.8 145.9 171.2 168.9 138.1 157.1
Pour Point, ° C. 82 3 −45 −51 −12 −21 −65 −33
Cloud Point, ° C. 25 −16 −51 12 9 −65
TBP 5%, ° F. 780 754 781 697 717 681 639
TBP 5%, ° C. approximate 416 401 416 366 380 360 337
TBP 50%, ° F. 926 896 903 915 907 852 855
TBP 50%, ° C. approximate 497 480 484 491 486 455 457
TBP 95%, ° F. 1056 1030 1030 1056 1051 1024 1014
TBP 95%, ° C. approximate 569 554 554 569 566 551 546
MB Closure, wt % 99.1 97.1 98.5 97.5 98.2 99.8 99.4

To obtain desirable wax isomerization results, a mild (e.g., 500-630° F. (260-332° C.)) first bed Pt/Beta temperature should be employed during lube hydroprocessing. The mild Pt/Beta temperature should be employed with varying Pt/ZSM-48 temperature to achieve a target lube pour point. At a constant Pt/ZSM-48 (second bed) temperature, a high Pt/Beta temperature was found to have negative effects on (i.e., increase) lube pour point. To achieve maximal lube yield, low operating pressure (<2,000 psi (136 atm) hydrogen pressure) should be used.

A cascaded Pt/ZSM-48 followed by Pt/Beta and stand-alone Pt/ZSM-48 were also evaluated and it was found that both catalyst systems were less selective in isomerizing and dewaxing C80 F-T wax to 700° F.+ (371° C.+) lube basestocks (Tables 2 and 3). Comparison of lube yields for the three catalyst systems tested is illustrated in FIG. 2. Pt/Beta followed by Pt/ZSM-48 gave approximately 10 wt % higher lube yield at a given pour point than Pt/ZSM-48 followed by Pt/Beta or Pt/ZSM-48 alone.

TABLE 2
Hydroisomerization of SASOL ™ C80
Fischer-Tropsch Wax Catalyzed by Pt/ZSM-48
Run Number, 401-
3-27 3-28 3-29 3-30 3-31
Time on Stream, Days 35.6 37.0 38.0 39.0 40.9
Temperature, ° F. 665 660 655 650 645
Temperature, ° C. approximate 352 349 352 343 341
Pressure, psig 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
(Pressure, atm) approximate 68 68 68 68 68
LHSV, hr−1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
WHSV, hr−1 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4
H2 Cofeeding Rate, scf/bbl 5656 5643 5603 5674 5657
(H2 Cofeeding Rate, n.L.L−1) approximate 1007 1004 997 1010 1007
700° F.+ (371° C.+) Conversion, wt % 78.0 70.6 60.0 49.9 44.2
H2 Consumption, scf/bbl 544 473 377 306 261
(H2 Consumption, n.L.L−1) approximate 97 84 67 54 46
Product Yield, wt % on Feed
C1—C4 Gas 8.3 6.8 5.4 4.4 3.5
C5−330° F. (C5-166° C.) Naphtha 30.0 26.1 19.6 15.6 13.7
330-700° F. (166-371° C.) Diesel 40.8 38.6 35.7 30.4 27.5
700° F.+ (371° C.+) Lube 22.0 29.4 40.0 50.1 55.8
Total Hydrocarbon 101.0 100.9 100.7 100.6 100.5
700° F.+ (371° C.+) Lube Properties Feed
KV @ 40° C., cSt 14.8 34.8 31.2 32.9 34.0
KV @ 100° C., cSt 9.4 3.65 6.59 6.29 6.66 6.90
Viscosity Index 135.5 147.4 156.9 163.8 168.6
Pour Point, ° C. 82 −54 −48 −33 −24 −12
TBP 5%, ° F. 570 778 753 766 770
(TBP 5%, ° C.) approximate 299 414 400 407 410
TBP 50%, ° F. 783 899 906 918 918
(TBP 50%, ° C.) approximate 417 482 485 492 492
TBP 95%, ° F. 998 997 1007 1014 1057
(TBP 95%, ° C.) approximate 537 536 542 546 569
MB Closure, wt % 99.6 98.8 98.8 97.9 97.1

TABLE 3
Hydroisomerization of SASOL ™ C80 Fischer-Tropsch Wax Catalyzed by a Cascaded Pt/ZSM-48
Followed by Pt/Beta (1.0 h−1 LHSV for Each Catalyst)
Run Number, 401-
3-3 3-11 3-16 3-20 3-22 3-24
Time on Stream, Days 3.6 15.1 21.6 26.5 28.6 31.1
ZSM-48 Temperature, ° F. 660 660 640 655 645 640
(ZSM-48 Temperature, ° C.) approximate 349 349 338 346 341 338
Beta Temperature, ° F. 560 560 540 560 560 560
(Beta Temperature, ° C.) approximate 293 293 282 293 293 293
Pressure, psig 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
(Pressure, atm) approximate 68 68 68 68 68 68
H2 Cofeeding Rate, scf/bbl 5786 6150 5575 5528 5607 5619
(H2 Cofeeding Rate, n.L.L−1) approximate 1030 1095 992 984 5607 1000
700° F.+ (371° C.) Conversion, wt % 83.5 79.4 34.6 60.7 47.7 40.4
H2 Consumption, scf/bbl 499 516 205 377 270 225
(H2 Consumption, n.L.L−1) approximate 89 92 36 67 48 40
Product Yield, wt % on Feed
C1—C4 Gas 4.0 6.2 3.2 5.7 3.4 2.8
C5-330° F. (C5-166° C.) Naphtha 33.4 31.2 9.6 18.2 13.2 11.4
330-700° F. (166-371° C.) Diesel 47.0 42.9 22.1 37.5 31.6 26.6
700° F.+ (371° C.+) Lube 16.5 20.6 65.4 39.3 52.3 59.6
Total Hydrocarbon 100.9 101.0 100.4 100.7 100.5 100.4
700° F.+ (371° C.+) Lube Properties Feed
KV @ 40° C., cSt 34.7 24.8 34.0 28.1 28.8 28.3
KV @ 100° C., cSt 9.4 6.31 5.06 6.91 5.77 5.98 6.00
Viscosity Index 133.5 136.0 168.7 153.4 159.8 165.2
Pour Point, ° C. 82 −60 −54 0 −33 −21 −9
Cloud Point, ° C. −60 −54 13 0 −10 4
TBP 5%, ° F. 754 702 783 723 719 716
(TBP 5%, ° C.) approximate 401 372 417 384 382 380
TBP 50%, ° F. 875 840 922 877 879 895
(TBP 50%, ° C.) approximate 468 449 494 469 471 479
TBP 95%, ° F. 1004 1006 1062 1030 1019 1028
(TBP 95%, ° C.) approximate 540 541 572 554 548 553
MB Closure, wt % 97.6 95.6 98.2 98.5 98.0 98.1

Approximately 5° F. (2.8° C.) less Pt/ZSM-48 temperature is required to achieve a target pour point when a cascaded Pt/Beta and Pt/ZSM-48 was used instead of stand-alone Pt/ZSM-48 (Tables 1 and 2). This resultant reduction of Pt/ZSM-48 severity should reduce the cracking activity of the catalyst and is assumed to be a primary contributor to the yield benefit for the dual catalyst system. The addition of Pt/Beta had minimal effects on the range of Pt/ZSM-48 operating temperature, which was also observed for the catalyst system Pt/ZSM-48 followed by Pt/Beta (Tables 2 and 3).

The viscosity and viscosity index of the nominal 700° F.+(371° C.+) C80 wax isomerates vs. hydroprocessing severity are plotted in FIGS. 3 and 4, respectively. The three sets of data compared in the two diagrams correspond to the F-T wax isomerates prepared using Pt/Beta followed by Pt/ZSM-48, Pt/ZSM-48 followed by Pt/Beta, and Pt/ZSM-48 alone. For products of the invention, a viscosity index of at least 160 at a −20° C. lube pour point and a viscosity index of at least 135 at a pour point of no more than −50° C. is preferred.

As shown in FIG. 3, the viscosity of the Pt/Beta-Pt/ZSM-48 F-T lubes changes only slightly vs. pour point and is very close to that of the Pt/ZSM-48 lubes. The small viscosity differences are also partially attributable to variation in the initial boiling point of the actual 700° F.+(371° C.+) distillation cuts. However, the Pt/ZSM-48-Pt/Beta F-T isomerates had lower viscosities presumably due to the relatively high cracking activity of Pt/Beta catalyst towards multi-branched isoparaffins. The cracking activity of Pt/Beta with pure wax or lightly branched paraffins should be low as in the case of C80 wax isomerization catalyzed by Pt/Beta followed by Pt/ZSM-48 system.

The viscosity index of the Pt/Beta-Pt/ZSM-48 F-T lubes is similar to that of the Pt/ZSM-48 isomerates except at an extremely low pour point (FIG. 4). For comparison, Pt/ZSM-48 followed by Pt/Beta yields a lower lube VI at a given pour point (e.g., 4-9 viscosity index numbers). The VI differences observed for the three catalyst systems could be attributable to the higher shape selectivity of ZSM-48 vs. Zeolite Beta towards multi-branched isoparaffins. During the wax hydroisomerization process, the smaller pore structure of ZSM-48 (0.53×0.56 nm, unidimensional) could effectively exclude highly branched, low pour, paraffins and selectively convert waxy normal paraffins or lightly branched paraffins, thus prohibiting the formation of excessively branched (or low VI) isomers. However, the large pore structure of Zeolite Beta (0.64×0.76 nm) is expected to be less shape-selective and possibly continue to transform highly branched paraffins to even more branched molecules, which would, of course, lower VI of the lube product and cause the catalyst being less effective in reducing lube pour point. The easy accessibility of Beta Zeolite's larger pore structure to highly branched isoparaffins also promotes cracking of these hydrocarbon molecules, resulting in a lower lube viscosity and yield. More details regarding the shape selectivity of ZSM-48 in lube isomerization and dewaxing will be discussed in the following sections.

The spread between the lube cloud and pour points for Pt/Beta-Pt/ZSM-48 and Pt/ZSM-48-Pt/Beta is typically less than 30° C. (Tables 1 and 3). In general, the spread between the lube cloud and pour points narrows with decreasing pour point.

A combination of Pt/Beta followed by Pt/ZSM-48 exhibited an unusual relationship between reaction temperature and lube product pour point during the wax hydroisomerization (Table 4). At constant Pt/Beta temperature, the lube pour point decreases with increasing Pt/ZSM-48 temperature. However, at constant Pt/ZSM-48 temperature, the lube pour point increases with increasing Pt/Beta temperature.

TABLE 4
Hydroisomerization of SASOL ™ C80 F-T Wax to Lubes
Catalyzed by Pt/Beta Followed by Pt/ZSM-48
(Conditions: 1000 psig (68 atm), 1.0 h−1 LHSV for Each Catalyst)
Beta Temp. (° F.) 560 560 560 520 540 560 580
Beta Temp. 293 293 293 271 282 293 304
(approx. ° C.)
ZSM-48 Temp. 630 645 660 660 645 645 645
(° F.)
ZSM-48 Temp. 332 341 349 349 341 341 341
(approx. ° C.)
Lube Properties
Pour Point, ° C. 15 −15 −45 −65 −18 −15 −9
KV @ 100° C., cSt 7.60 7.16 6.49 5.20 6.62 7.16 6.01
Viscosity Index 179.2 167.8 149.8 138.1 165.2 167.8 173.4

Since degree of branching of the Pt/Beta isomerates is anticipated to increase at high Beta temperature, this experimental result indicates that Pt/ZSM-48 is more effective in isomerizing and dewaxing less branched isoparaffins, and thus is shape selective. In case that a feed contains both lightly is branched and highly branched isoparaffins, it is likely that the ZSM-48 catalyst would preferentially convert/isoimerize the lightly branched molecules. This explains why Pt/ZSM-48 is an efficient catalyst for reducing lube pour point.

The shape selectivity of the catalyst is presumably due to its relatively small pore structure (0.53×0.56 nm, unidimensional) capable of differentiating different isoparaffins. The ability of ZSM-48 to preferentially convert normal paraffins or lightly branched paraffins and exclude highly branched isoparaffins reduces undesirable reactions such as cracking (leading to low lube yield) and excessive further isomerization (leading to low VI) of low pour, highly branched isomers. This is consistent with the low cracking activity, high lube yield, minimal viscosity loss, and high lube VI observed for Pt/ZSM-48 in isomerizing and dewaxing various waxy feeds including F-T waxes.

The correlation between reaction temperature and lube pour point was found to be normal for Pt/ZSM-48 followed by Pt/Beta (Table 5). The lube pour point decreases either with increasing Pt/ZSM-48 temperature and constant Pt/Beta temperature or with constant Pt/ZSM-48 temperature and increasing Pt/Beta temperature. This is not unexpected since the large pore Beta should be less selective than ZSM-48 in reacting with various branched isoparaffins, and would convert even highly branched paraffin isomers via cracking and additional isomerization.

TABLE 5
Hydroisomerization of SASOL ™ C80 F-T Wax to Lubes
Catalyzed by Pt/ZSM-48 Followed by Pt/Beta
(Conditions: 1000 psig (68 atm), 1.0 h−1 LHSV for Each Catalyst)
ZSM-48 Temp. (° F.) 640 640 640 640 655 660
ZSM-48 Temp. (approx. 338 338 338 338 346 349
° C.)
Beta Temp. (° F.) 530 560 590 560 560 560
Beta Temp. (approx. ° C.) 277 293 310 293 293 293
Lube Properties
Pour Point, ° C. 0 −18 −45 −18 −33 −54
KV @ 100° C., cSt 6.92 5.97 5.16 5.97 5.77 5.06
Viscosity Index 169.4 158.0 138.4 158.0 153.4 136.0

Pt/Beta-Pt/ZSM-48 system has superior isomerization selectivity and low cracking activity, and gives lower yields of light gases, naphtha, and diesel than Pt/ZSM-48-Pt/Beta and Pt/ZSM-48 alone (FIGS. 5-7). The overall light byproduct selectivity for the latter two catalysts is comparable. As expected, the yields of gases, naphtha, and diesel increase for all catalysts with increasing process severity (decreasing lube pour point) that promotes hydrocracking.

The following examples will serve to illustrate the invention.

Feedstock. The hydrotreated SASOL™ PARAFLINT™ C80 Fischer-Tropsch wax feed was obtained from Moore and Munger, Inc., (Shelton, Conn.) and used as received without additional pretreatment. The C80 wax was a mixture of predominantly linear paraffins with very low content of olefins and oxygenates. SASOL™ has been marketing three commercial grades of F-T waxes: PARAFLINT™ H1, a 700° F.+(371° C.+) full range Fischer-Tropsch wax; PARAFLINT™ C80 and C105, 700-1100° F. (371-593° C.) and 1100° F.+(593° C.+) distillate fractions, respectively. The molecular weight distribution (in terms of boiling point) of the waxes is illustrated briefly in Table 6.

TABLE 6
Molecular Weight Distribution of SASOL ™ Fischer-Tropsch Waxes
F-T Wax Feed H1 C80 C105
Pour Point, ° C. 99 82 106
IBP-700° F. (<C24), wt % 0 3 0
700-1100° F. (C24-C60), wt % 44 89 20
1100° F.+ (>C60), wt % 56 8 80

Preparation of Pt/Beta Catalyst. Pt/Beta catalyst was prepared by extruding a water-containing mull mix or paste containing 65 parts of Zeolite Beta with 35 pails of alumina (dry basis). After drying, the Zeolite Beta containing catalyst was calcined under nitrogen at 900° F. (482° C.) and exchanged at ambient temperature with a sufficient quantity of ammonium nitrate to remove residual sodium in the zeolite channels. The extrudate was then washed with de-ionized water and calcined in air at 1000° F. (538° C.). After air calcination, the 65% Zeolite Beta/35% Alumina extrudate was steamed at 1020° F. (549° C.) to reduce the Alpha value of the calcined catalyst to less than 10. The steamed, 65% low acidity Beta/35% Alumina catalyst was ion exchanged with a tetra-ammine platinum chloride solution under ion exchange conditions to uniformly produce a catalyst containing 0.6% Pt. After washing with de-ionized water to remove residual chlorides, the catalyst was dried at 250° F. (121° C.) followed by a final air calcination at 680° F. (360° C.).

Preparation of Pt/ZSM-48 Catalyst. Pt/ZSM-48 catalyst was prepared by extruding a water-containing mull mix or paste containing 65 pails of ZSM-48 with 35 pails of alumina (dry basis). After drying, the ZSM-48 containing catalyst was calcined under nitrogen at 900° F. (482° C.) and exchanged at ambient temperature with a sufficient quantity of ammonium nitrate to remove residual sodium in the zeolite channels. The extrudate was then washed with deionized water and calcined in air at 1000° F. (538° C.). After air calcination, the 65% ZSM-48/35% Alumina catalyst was impregnated with a tetraammine platinum nitrate solution under incipient wetness conditions to uniformly produce a catalyst containing 0.6% Pt. Finally, the catalyst was dried at 250° F. (121° C.) followed by air calcination at 680° F. (360° C.).

Wax Hydroprocessing. The wax hydroisomerization experiments were performed using a micro-unit equipped with two three-zone furnaces and two down-flow trickle-bed tubular reactors (½″ ID) in cascade (with option to bypass the second reactor). The unit was carefully heat-traced to avoid freezing of the high melting point C80 wax. To reduce feed bypassing and lower zeolite pore diffusion resistance, the catalysts extrudates were crushed and sized to 60-80 mesh. The reactors 1 and 2 were then loaded with 15 cc of the 60-80 mesh Pt/ZSM-48 catalyst and the 60-80 mesh Pt/Beta catalyst, respectively. 5 cc of 80-120 mesh sand was also added to both catalyst beds during catalyst loading to fill the void spaces. After pressure testing of the unit, the catalysts were dried and reduced at 400° F. (204° C.) for one hour under 1 atmosphere (atm.), 255 cc/min hydrogen flow. At the end of this period, the flow of pure hydrogen was stopped and flow of H2S (2% in hydrogen) was initiated at 100 cc/min. After H2S breakthrough, the reactors 1 and 2 were gradually heated to 700° F. (371° C.) and maintained at 700° F. (371° C.) for 1 h (hour). After the completion of catalyst pre-sulfiding, the gas flow was switched back to pure hydrogen at 255 cc/minute rate, and the two reactors were cooled down.

Hydroisomerization of the C80 Fischer-Tropsch wax over a cascaded Pt/ZSM-48 followed by Pt/Beta was conducted at 1.0 h−1 LHSV for each catalyst and 1000 psig (68 atm) with 5500 scf (979 n.L.L−1) hydrogen/bbl circulation rate. The wax isomerization experiments were started first by saturating the catalyst beds with the feed at 400° F. (204° C.) then heating the reactors to the initial operating temperatures. Material balances were carried out overnight for 16-24 h. Reactor temperatures were then gradually changed to vary pour point.

Performance of stand-alone Pt/ZSM-48 was evaluated by cooling and bypassing the Pt/Beta catalyst in the second reactor. The experiments were conducted under identical process conditions (1.0 LHSV, 1000 psig (68 atm), 5500 scf/bbl (979 n.L.L−1) H2) and according to similar procedures used for testing the cascade Pt/ZSM-48 and Pt/Beta combination.

Performance of Pt/Beta followed by Pt/ZSM-48 was evaluated after switching the two reactors, i.e. order of Pt/ZSM-48 and Pt/Beta catalysts. Process conditions and experimental procedures similar to those for testing the cascaded Pt/ZSM-48 and Pt/Beta combination were employed.

Product Separation and Analysis. Off-gas samples were analyzed by GC using a 60 m DB-1 (0.25 mm ID) capillary column with FID detection. Total liquid products (TLP's) were weighed and analyzed by simulated distillation (Simdis, such as D2887) using high temperature GC. TLP's were distilled into IBP-330° F. (IBP-166° C.) naphtha, 330-700° F. (166-371° C.) distillate, and 700° F.+(371° C.+) lube fractions. The 700° F.+(371° C.+) lube fractions were again analyzed by Simdis to ensure accuracy of the actual distillation operations. The pour point and cloud point of 700° F.+(371° C.+) lubes were measured by D97 and D2500 methods, and their viscosities were determined at both 40° C. and 100° C. according to D445-3 and D445-5 methods, respectively.

Hoglen, Larry E., Jiang, Zhaozhong, Helton, Terry Eugene, Partridge, Randall David

Patent Priority Assignee Title
11198114, Dec 16 2016 SHELL USA, INC Catalyst system for dewaxing
Patent Priority Assignee Title
2250410,
3711399,
4097364, Jun 13 1975 Chevron Research Company Hydrocracking in the presence of water and a low hydrogen partial pressure
4181597, Jul 03 1972 Mobil Oil Corporation Method of stabilizing lube oils
4335019, Jan 13 1981 Mobil Oil Corporation Preparation of natural ferrierite hydrocracking catalyst and hydrocarbon conversion with catalyst
4377469, Sep 30 1981 Mobil Oil Corporation Maintaining catalytic activity of sodium aluminosilicates
4388177, Jan 13 1981 Mobil Oil Corporation Preparation of natural ferrierite hydrocracking catalyst and hydrocarbon conversion with catalyst
4402866, Dec 16 1981 Mobil Oil Corporation Aging resistance shape selective catalyst with enhanced activity
4431516, Nov 13 1981 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Hydrocracking process
4431517, Nov 13 1981 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Process for mild hydrocracking of hydrocarbon feeds
4431519, Oct 13 1982 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for catalytically dewaxing oils
4431527, Nov 13 1981 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Process for hydrogen treating high nitrogen content hydrocarbon feeds
4436614, Oct 08 1982 Chevron Research Company Process for dewaxing and desulfurizing oils
4460698, Nov 13 1981 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Hydrocarbon conversion catalyst
4483764, Nov 13 1981 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Hydrocarbon conversion process
4490242, Aug 07 1981 MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, A NY CORP Two-stage hydrocarbon dewaxing hydrotreating process
4510045, May 28 1982 Mobil Oil Corporation Hydrocarbon dewaxing process using steam-activated alkali metal zeolite catalyst
4568449, Aug 16 1982 UOP Hydrotreating catalyst and process
4594146, Feb 08 1982 Mobil Oil Corporation Conversion with zeolite catalysts prepared by steam treatment
4599162, Dec 21 1984 Mobil Oil Corporation Cascade hydrodewaxing process
4601993, May 25 1984 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalyst composition dewaxing of lubricating oils
4610778, Apr 01 1983 Mobil Oil Corporation Two-stage hydrocarbon dewaxing process
4622130, Dec 09 1985 Shell Oil Company Economic combinative solvent and catalytic dewaxing process employing methylisopropyl ketone as the solvent and a silicate-based catalyst
4636299, Dec 24 1984 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Process for the manufacture of lubricating oils
4684756, May 01 1986 Mobil Oil Corporation Process for upgrading wax from Fischer-Tropsch synthesis
4767522, Nov 28 1984 Mobil Oil Corporation Distillate dewaxing process with mixed zeolites
4784747, Mar 22 1982 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalysts over steam activated zeolite catalyst
4810357, May 03 1984 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalytic dewaxing of light and heavy oils in dual parallel reactors
4911821, Nov 01 1985 Mobil Oil Corporation Lubricant production process employing sequential dewaxing and solvent extraction
4919788, Dec 21 1984 Mobil Oil Corporation Lubricant production process
4975177, Nov 01 1985 Mobil Oil Corporation High viscosity index lubricants
5017535, Jun 20 1990 AKZO N V , ARNHEM, THE NETHERLANDS, A CORP OF THE NETHERLANDS Process for the preparation of a presulfided and sulfided catalyst
5037528, Nov 01 1985 Mobil Oil Corporation Lubricant production process with product viscosity control
5059299, Dec 18 1987 Exxon Research and Engineering Company Method for isomerizing wax to lube base oils
5075269, Nov 09 1987 EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO Production of high viscosity index lubricating oil stock
5135638, Feb 17 1989 CHEVRON RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, SAN FRANCISCO, CA A DE CORP Wax isomerization using catalyst of specific pore geometry
5146022, Aug 23 1990 Mobil Oil Corporation High VI synthetic lubricants from cracked slack wax
5208403, Jan 09 1992 Mobil Oil Corporation High VI lubricant blends from slack wax
5232579, Jun 14 1991 EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO Catalytic cracking process utilizing a zeolite beta catalyst synthesized with a chelating agent
5246566, Feb 17 1989 Chevron Research and Technology Company Wax isomerization using catalyst of specific pore geometry
5275719, Jun 08 1992 EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO Production of high viscosity index lubricants
5276229, Aug 23 1990 Mobil Oil Corp. High VI synthetic lubricants from thermally cracked slack wax
5288395, Jul 24 1991 EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO Production of high viscosity index lubricants
5358628, Jul 05 1990 EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO Production of high viscosity index lubricants
5498821, Oct 13 1994 EXXON RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO Carbon dioxide addition in hydrocracking/hydroisomerization processes to control methane production
5516736, Mar 12 1992 Mobil Oil Corp. Selectivating zeolites with organosiliceous agents
5643440, Feb 12 1993 EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO Production of high viscosity index lubricants
5689031, Oct 17 1995 EXXON RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO Synthetic diesel fuel and process for its production
5730858, Apr 01 1996 FINA RESEARCH, S A Process for converting wax-containing hydrocarbon feedstocks into high-grade middle distillate products
5911874, Jun 28 1996 Exxon Research and Engineering Co.; EXXON RESEARCH & ENGINEERNG COMPANY Raffinate hydroconversion process
5935417, Dec 17 1996 EXXON RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO Hydroconversion process for making lubricating oil basestocks
5951848, Oct 31 1996 Mobil Oil Corporation Process for highly shape selective dewaxing which retards catalyst aging
5976351, Mar 28 1996 EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO Wax hydroisomerization process employing a boron-free catalyst
5993644, Jul 16 1996 CHEVRON U S A INC Base stock lube oil manufacturing process
6013171, Feb 03 1998 Exxon Research and Engineering Co. Catalytic dewaxing with trivalent rare earth metal ion exchanged ferrierite
6051129, Jul 24 1998 CHEVRON U S A INC Process for reducing haze point in bright stock
6080301, Sep 04 1998 ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company Premium synthetic lubricant base stock having at least 95% non-cyclic isoparaffins
6090989, Oct 20 1997 Mobil Oil Corporation Isoparaffinic lube basestock compositions
6096189, Dec 17 1996 EXXON RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO Hydroconversion process for making lubricating oil basestocks
6099719, Dec 17 1996 EXXON MOBILE RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO Hydroconversion process for making lubicating oil basestocks
6103101, Oct 01 1993 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.-Petrobras Process for producing lube base oils of high viscosity index and diesel oil of high cetaned number
6136181, Jul 15 1996 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Hydroconversion sulfur-containing lube feedstock using a sulfur resistant catalyst
6179994, Sep 04 1998 Exxon Research and Engineering Company Isoparaffinic base stocks by dewaxing fischer-tropsch wax hydroisomerate over Pt/H-mordenite
6190532, Jul 13 1998 EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO Production of high viscosity index lubricants
6231749, May 15 1998 EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO Production of high viscosity index lubricants
6264826, Jul 16 1996 Chevron U.S.A Inc. Base stock lube oil manufacturing process
6294077, Feb 02 2000 Mobil Oil Corporation Production of high viscosity lubricating oil stock with improved ZSM-5 catalyst
6310265, Nov 01 1999 EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO Isomerization of paraffins
6322692, Dec 17 1996 EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO Hydroconversion process for making lubricating oil basestocks
6337010, Aug 02 1999 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process scheme for producing lubricating base oil with low pressure dewaxing and high pressure hydrofinishing
6420618, Sep 04 1998 ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company Premium synthetic lubricant base stock (Law734) having at least 95% noncyclic isoparaffins
6652735, Apr 26 2001 ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company Process for isomerization dewaxing of hydrocarbon streams
6663768, Mar 06 1998 Chevron U.S.A. Inc.; CHEVRON U S A INC Preparing a HGH viscosity index, low branch index dewaxed
20010004972,
20010006154,
20020003102,
20020192156,
20030168379,
EP140468,
EP147873,
EP225053,
EP324528,
EP635557,
EP707057,
EP776959,
EP909304,
FR2805542,
FR2805543,
GB1582789,
GB2109402,
GB2311789,
GB772478,
SU1696391,
WO107538,
WO118156,
WO164339,
WO248283,
WO248291,
WO288279,
WO299014,
WO9607715,
WO9718278,
WO9920720,
WO9941336,
/////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Oct 08 2002ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company(assignment on the face of the patent)
Nov 22 2002JIANG, ZHAOZHONGEXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0139350713 pdf
Nov 25 2002HOGLEN, LARRY E EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0139350713 pdf
Dec 01 2002HELTON, TERRY EEXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0139350713 pdf
Dec 17 2002PARTRIDGE, RANDALL D EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0139350713 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Dec 06 2013REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Apr 27 2014EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Apr 27 20134 years fee payment window open
Oct 27 20136 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 27 2014patent expiry (for year 4)
Apr 27 20162 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Apr 27 20178 years fee payment window open
Oct 27 20176 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 27 2018patent expiry (for year 8)
Apr 27 20202 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Apr 27 202112 years fee payment window open
Oct 27 20216 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 27 2022patent expiry (for year 12)
Apr 27 20242 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)