The present invention is related to patent-related tools, and methodologies involving those tools, for assisting in all stages of the merger and acquisition process. The IPAM server may be used in conjunction with the tools and methodologies to aid in the merger and acquisition process. These tools or methods include, but are not limited to, a topographic map, a technology classification, a SIC classification, a radar diagram, a patent citation tree, a citation root tree, a citation count report, a citation frequency graph, a citation frequency report, a patent count/year, an application count/year, a patent aging graph, a U.S. primary class/subclass, an international patent class, an assignee patent count report by primary class/subclass, a patent count graph by number of patents, a top assignees primary class/subclass by percent of total, a months to issue patents, a features grouping, a document annotation, an inventor patent count/assignee, an inventor patent count graph, and inventor data.
|
29. An apparatus comprising:
a processor; and
a memory storing control logic, that when executed by the processor, causes the processor to:
receive identification of a target entity;
receive a request to invoke a technology classification tool;
perform technology classification processing including:
identifying intellectual property assets assigned to the target entity;
determining the number of intellectual property assets assigned to each technology class in a predetermined set of technology classes; and
graphically presenting the number of intellectual property assets per technology class;
receive a request to invoke a patent citation tool for a presented technology class; and
for each intellectual property asset in the requested technology class, perform patent citation processing in response to the request to invoke the patent citation tool, including:
identifying forward-cite intellectual property assets which cite the intellectual property asset being processed as a reference;
identifying backward-cite intellectual property assets cited by the intellectual property asset being processed;
color-coding the identified forward cite intellectual property assets and the identified backward-cite intellectual property assets according to a freedom-to-practice metric, thereby generating; and
graphically presenting the color-coded citation tree; and
determine, based on the technology classification processing, whether a strategic fit exists between the acquiring entity and the target entity, wherein criteria for determining a strategic fit includes one or more of:
level of overlap between intellectual property assets assigned to the acquiring entity and the target entity; and
number of complimentary intellectual property assets assigned to the target entity.
14. A computer-implemented system for facilitating merger and acquisition transactions for an acquiring entity, a merger and acquisition transaction having an identify potential targets stage, an evaluate/analyze stage, a due diligence stage, and a negotiation stage, the computer-implemented system comprising:
a plurality of tools, including a first tool comprising one or more computers configured to perform technology classification processing including:
identifying intellectual property assets assigned to an identified target entity;
determining the number of intellectual property assets assigned to each technology class in a predetermined set of technology classes; and
graphically presenting the number of intellectual property assets per technology class; and
a second tool comprising one or more computers configured to, for each intellectual property asset in the requested technology class, perform patent citation processing including:
identifying forward-cite intellectual property assets which cite the intellectual property asset being processed as a reference;
identifying backward-cite intellectual property assets cited by the intellectual property asset being processed;
color-coding the identified forward cite intellectual property assets and the identified backward-cite intellectual property assets according to a freedom-to-practice metric, thereby generating a color-coded citation tree; and
graphically presenting the color-coded citation tree;
an invoking means for invoking a tool from said plurality of tools upon receipt of a request for said tool; and
a third tool for determining whether a strategic fit exists between the acquiring entity and the target entity, wherein criteria for determining a strategic fit includes one or more of:
level of overlap between intellectual property assets assigned to the acquiring entity and the target entity; and
number of complimentary intellectual property assets assigned to the target entity.
1. A computer-implemented method for facilitating a merger and acquisition transaction for an acquiring entity, the merger and acquisition transaction having an identify potential targets stage, an evaluate/analyze stage, a due diligence stage, and a negotiation stage, the computer-implemented method comprising:
receiving identification of a target entity;
receiving a request to invoke a technology classification tool comprising one or more computers;
performing technology classification processing including:
identifying intellectual property assets assigned to the target entity;
determining, by a computer, the number of intellectual property assets assigned to each technology class in a predetermined set of technology classes; and
graphically presenting the number of intellectual property assets per technology class;
receiving a request to invoke a patent citation tool comprising one or more computers for a presented technology class; and
for each intellectual property asset in the requested technology class, performing patent citation processing in response to the request to invoke the patent citation tool, including:
identifying forward-cite intellectual property assets which cite the intellectual property asset being processed as a reference;
identifying backward-cite intellectual property assets cited by the intellectual property asset being processed;
color-coding the identified forward cite intellectual property assets and the identified backward-cite intellectual property assets according to a freedom-to-practice metric, thereby generating a color-coded citation tree; and
graphically presenting the color-coded citation tree; and
determining, based on the technology classification processing, whether a strategic fit exists between the acquiring entity and the target entity, wherein criteria for determining a strategic fit includes one or more of:
level of overlap between intellectual property assets assigned to the acquiring entity and the target entity; and
number of complimentary intellectual property assets assigned to the target entity.
28. A computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon, computer-executable instructions that if executed by an apparatus, causes the apparatus to facilitate a merger and acquisition transaction for an acquiring entity by a method, the merger and acquisition transaction having an identify potential targets stage, an evaluate/analyze stage, a due diligence stage, and a negotiation stage, the method comprising:
receiving identification of a target entity;
receiving a request to invoke a technology classification tool;
performing technology classification processing including:
identifying intellectual property assets assigned to the target entity;
determining the number of intellectual property assets assigned to each technology class in a predetermined set of technology classes; and
graphically presenting the number of intellectual property assets per technology class;
receiving a request to invoke a patent citation tool for a presented technology class; and
for each intellectual property asset in the requested technology class, performing patent citation processing in response to the request to invoke the patent citation tool, including:
identifying forward-cite intellectual property assets which cite the intellectual property asset being processed as a reference;
identifying backward-cite intellectual property assets cited by the intellectual property asset being processed;
color-coding the identified forward cite intellectual property assets and the identified backward-cite intellectual property assets according to a freedom-to-practice metric, thereby generating a color-coded citation tree; and
graphically presenting the color-coded citation tree; and
determining, based on the technology classification processing, whether a strategic fit exists between the acquiring entity and the target entity, wherein criteria for determining a strategic fit includes one or more of:
level of overlap between intellectual property assets assigned to the acquiring entity and the target entity; and
number of complimentary intellectual property assets assigned to the target entity.
30. A system for facilitating a merger and acquisition transaction for an acquiring entity, the merger and acquisition transaction having an identify potential targets stage, an evaluate/analyze stage, a due diligence stage, and a negotiation stage, the system comprising:
a first receiving means for enabling a computer to receive identification of a target entity;
a second receiving means for enabling a computer to receive a request to invoke a technology classification tool;
classification means for enabling a computer to perform technology classification processing including:
identifying intellectual property assets assigned to the target entity;
determining the number of intellectual property assets assigned to each technology class in a predetermined set of technology classes; and
graphically presenting the number of intellectual property assets per technology class;
a third receiving means for enabling a computer to receive a request to invoke a patent citation tool for a presented technology class; and
a processing means for enabling a computer to, for each intellectual property asset in the requested technology class, perform patent citation processing in response to the request to invoke the patent citation tool, including:
identifying forward-cite intellectual property assets which cite the intellectual property asset being processed as a reference;
identifying backward-cite intellectual property assets cited by the intellectual property asset being processed;
color-coding the identified forward cite intellectual property assets and the identified backward-cite intellectual property assets according to a freedom-to-practice metric, thereby generating a color-coded citation tree; and
graphically presenting the color-coded citation tree; and
a determining means for enabling a computer to determine, based on the technology classification processing, whether there is a strategic fit between the acquiring entity and the target entity, wherein criteria for determining a strategic fit includes one or more of:
level of overlap between intellectual property assets assigned to the acquiring entity and the target entity; and
number of complimentary intellectual property assets assigned to the target entity.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
upon receipt of a request, invoking a tool comprising one or more computers, during the evaluate/analyze stage, for generating a Standard Industrial classification (SIC) based classification, wherein said SIC based classification identifies a scope and magnitude of potential competitors and licensees of patents identified as intellectual property assets assigned to the target entity when performing technology classification processing.
5. The method of
upon receipt of a request, invoking a tool comprising one or more computers, during the due diligence stage, for generating a citation count report, wherein said report identifies the most valuable patents in a company's portfolio to further investigate in said due diligence stage.
6. The method of
upon receipt of a request, invoking a tool comprising one or more computers, during the negotiation stage, for generating a patent count/year report, wherein said report identifies companies who have continuously developed technology related to the patents identified as intellectual property assets assigned to the target entity when performing technology classification processing and who have competence to commercialize competing products in a proposed merger.
7. The method of
upon receipt of a request, invoking a tool comprising one or more computers, during the due diligence stage, for generating a patent application count/year report, wherein said report identifies the intensity of recent development efforts in the target entity.
8. The method of
upon receipt of a request, invoking a tool comprising one or more computers, during the negotiation stage, for generating a patent aging graph, wherein said graph identifies a number of years until expiration for the intellectual property assets identified as intellectual property assets assigned to the target entity when performing technology classification processing, thereby revealing technologies that are young and have capacity to bring value to a merger between the acquiring entity and the target entity.
9. The method of
upon receipt of a request, invoking a tool comprising one or more computers, during the due diligence stage, for generating an international class report, wherein said report identifies the international class of intellectual property assets identified as intellectual property assets assigned to the target entity when performing technology classification processing to depict an area of intellectual property concentration.
10. The method of
upon receipt of a request, invoking a tool comprising one or more computers, during the negotiation stage, for generating an assignee count report, wherein said report provides information relating to where the acquiring entity and the target entity rank in an overall competitive landscape in a primary class area based on number of issued patents and determines whether a proposed merger will broaden a patent portfolio of the target entity or the acquiring entity.
11. The method of
upon receipt of a request, invoking a tool comprising one or more computers, during the evaluate/analyze stage, for generating an inventor patent count/assignee report, wherein said report identifies possible joint development agreements/ventures whereby said report is used to determine if said possible joint development agreements/ventures pose a risk to a possible merger.
12. The method of
upon receipt of a request, invoking a tool comprising one or more computers, during the due diligence stage, for generating an inventor patent count graph, wherein said graph an indication of inventors with a majority of inventions in the identified intellectual property assets of the target entity to assist in determining key inventors of said target entity who should be retained by said acquiring entity to continue success obtained by said target entity in an acquisition.
13. The method of
wherein performing technology classification processing further comprises:
selecting a task related to determining an average number of inventors per patent; and
invoking a tool, during the negotiation stage, for generating inventor data, wherein said data is useful for determining whether a corporate culture of the acquiring entity will be a post-merger compatible fit for a corporate culture of the target entity.
15. The system of
a tool for generating a map;
a tool for generating a technology classification;
a tool for generating a Standard Industrial classification (SIC) based classification;
a tool for generating a diagram;
a tool for generating a report;
a tool for generating a graph;
a tool for generating a class;
a tool for generating a grouping;
a tool for generating an annotation; or
a tool for generating inventor data.
16. The system of
17. The system of
18. The system of
19. The system of
20. The system of
21. The system of
22. The system of
23. The system of
24. The system of
25. The system of
26. The system of
27. The system of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The present application is a continuation-in-part application to the following applications:
“Patent-Related Tools and Methodology for Use in Research and Development Projects,” invented by Germeraad et. al., application Ser. No. 09/545,564, Filed: Apr. 7, 2000, now pending (incorporated by reference in its entirety);
“Intellectual Property Asset Manager (IPAM) for Context Processing of Data Objects,” invented by Rivette et al., application Ser. No. 09/260,079, Filed: Mar. 2, 1999, now pending (incorporated by reference in its entirety); and
“Patent-Related Tools and Methodology for Use in the Merger and Acquisition Process,” invented by Germeraad et. al., application Ser. No. 09/560,889, Filed: Apr. 28, 2000, now pending (incorporated by reference in its entirety).
The present application is related to the following applications and patents:
“System, Method, and Computer Program Product for Patent-Centric and Group-Oriented Data Processing,” invented by Rivette et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,991,751, issued Nov. 23, 1999 from application Ser. No. 08/867,392; Filed: Jun. 2, 1997 (incorporated by reference in its entirety);
“Using Hyperbolic Trees to Visualize Data Generated by Patent-Centric and Group-Oriented Data Processing,” invented by Rivette et al., application Ser. No. 08/921,369; Filed: Aug. 29, 1997, now pending (incorporated by reference in its entirety);
“System, Method, and Computer Program Product for Managing and Analyzing Intellectual Property (IP) Related Transactions,” invented by Rivette et al., application Ser. No. 09/138,368; Filed: Aug. 21, 1998, now pending (incorporated by reference in its entirety);
“Method and Apparatus for Synchronizing, Displaying and Manipulating Text and Image Documents,” invented by Rivette et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,623,681, issued Apr. 22, 1997, from application Ser. No. 08/155,572, filed Nov. 19, 1993, issued (incorporated by reference in its entirety);
“System and Method and Computer Program Product for Using Intelligent Notes to Organize, Link, and Manipulate Disparate Data Objects,” invented by Rivette et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,806,079, issued Apr. 17, 1996 from application Ser. No. 08/632,801; Filed: Apr. 17, 1996 (incorporated by reference in its entirety);
“Method and Apparatus for Synchronizing, Displaying and Manipulating Text and Image Documents”, invented by Rivette et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,809,318, issued Sep. 15, 1998 from application Ser. No. 08/832,971; filed Apr. 4, 1997 (incorporated by reference in its entirety);
“System, Method, and Computer Program Product for Accessing a Note Database Having Subnote Information for the Purpose of Manipulating Subnotes Linked to Portions of Documents,” invented by Rivette et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,950,214, issued Sep. 7, 1999 from application Ser. No. 09/058,275; Filed: Apr. 10, 1998 (incorporated by reference in its entirety);
“System and Method for Developing and Maintaining Documents,” invented by Rivette et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,754,840, issued May 19, 1998, from application Ser. No. 08/590,082, filed Jan. 23, 1996 (incorporated by reference in its entirety);
“System, Method, and Computer Program Product for Generating Equivalent Text Files,” invented by Rivette et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,799,325, issued Aug. 25, 1998, from application Ser. No. 08/662,377, filed Jun. 12, 1996 (incorporated by reference in its entirety);
“System, Method, and Computer Program Product for Managing and Analyzing Intellectual Property (IP) Related Transactions,” invented by Rivette et al., application Ser. No. 09/138,368; Filed: Aug. 21, 1998, pending (incorporated by reference in its entirety); and
“System, Method, and Computer Program Product for Creating Subnotes Linked to Portions of Data Objects After Entering an Annotation Mode,” invented by Rivette et al., application Ser. No. 09/057,557; Filed: Apr. 9, 1998, pending (incorporated by reference in its entirety).
1. Field of the Invention
The invention is generally directed to methodologies related to the merger and acquisition process, and more particularly directed to patent-related tools and methodologies involving those tools for assisting in all stages of the merger and acquisition process.
2. Related Art
The merger and acquisition process typically goes through a variety of stages before Company A and Company B come to an agreement regarding the merger of the two, or the acquisition of one of the companies. A flowchart, as shown in
Prior to Company B even considering a merger and/or acquisition of another company, Company B determines that it needs growth and/or profits. Once this is determined, Company B may decide to consider a merger and/or acquisition of another company to satisfy its desired growth and/or profits. Management of Company B then sets relationship/selection criteria for any merger or acquisition of another company it will consider.
The first stage in the merger and acquisition process is the identify potential targets stage 102. Here, the management of Company B has set the relationship/selection criteria for any merger and/or acquisition of another company it will consider.
The second stage is the evaluate/analyze stage 104. Here, various companies are evaluated and analyzed for Company B to approach for possible mergers and/or acquisitions. The management of Company B will make one or more recommendations of other companies to approach for a merger and/or acquisition.
The next stage is the due diligence stage 106. Here, due diligence is conducted on each of the companies the management of Company B made a recommendation on in the evaluate/analyze stage 104.
The final stage is the negotiation stage 108. In this stage, Company B conducts negotiations and/or consummation and/or integration of one or more companies that passed due diligence in the due diligence stage 106. The outcome of this stage is the possible merger or acquisition of another company that Company A has determined will satisfy its desire for growth and/or profit.
It is possible to facilitate, expedite, and enhance the merger and acquisition process by building upon work that has been performed in the past. However, there are little if any automated tools for assisting in this process. There are even less automated tools that utilize patent-related tools for assisting in the merger and acquisition process.
The present invention is related to patent-related tools, and methodologies involving those tools, for assisting in the merger and acquisition process. In the present invention, the IPAM server may be used in conjunction with the tools and methodologies to aid in the merger and acquisition process. These tools or methods include, but are not limited to, a topographic map, a technology classification, a SIC classification, a radar diagram, a patent citation tree, a citation root tree, a citation count report, a citation frequency graph, a citation frequency report, a patent count/year, an application count/year, a patent aging graph, a U.S. primary class/subclass, an international patent class, an assignee patent count report by primary class/subclass, a patent count graph by number of patents, a top assignees primary class/subclass by percent of total, a months to issue patents, a features grouping, a document annotation, an inventor patent count/assignee, an inventor patent count graph, and an inventor data.
Further features and advantages of the invention, as well as the structure and operation of various embodiments of the invention, are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. The drawing in which an element first appears is typically indicated by the leftmost character(s) and/or digit(s) in the corresponding reference number.
The present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The present invention is related to patent-related tools, and methodologies involving those tools, for assisting in all stages of the merger and acquisition process.
The present invention provides patent-related tools and methodologies for the merger and acquisition process. This may be accomplished through an Intellectual Property Asset Management (IPAM) server, which is described in detail in the patent and applications referenced above in the section entitled “Cross-Reference to Other Patents and Applications.” The functionality of the present invention that is described herein as being performed by the IPAM server, is not limited to being performed by the IPAM server. For example, tools such as Excel spreadsheets, the IBM patent server, the USPTO public server, and Manning and Napier's search tools can all be used to perform some or most of the steps of the described methodologies. It is important to note that the exact platform used to perform the methodologies herein is not critical.
The IPAM server may be used in conjunction with the tools to aid in the merger and acquisition process. For convenience, the IPAM server will briefly be discussed herein, although the invention is not limited to this brief description.
Briefly stated, the IPAM server deals with context data processing. The IPAM server may be used to define and select one or more contexts. Each context includes one or more attributes, and a plurality of data objects that satisfy the attributes. A list of data objects contained in the selected contexts may be displayed. At least some of the data objects in the selected contexts may be processed. Such processing may involve generating hierarchical and/or directed acyclic graph data structures to represent relationships among the data objects. These data structures can then be displayed in a variety of well-known techniques including, but not limited to, hyperbolic trees. Examples of such hierarchical or directed acyclic graph structures include claim trees, citation trees, and data object families, which may be displayed using hyperbolic trees.
In an embodiment, the contexts are groups. In another embodiment, the contexts are each associated with a data object type. In this latter embodiment, the contexts include data objects of their respective data object types.
The IPAM server also supports the generation of annotations. The IPAM server supports a plurality of annotation types, including document annotations, group annotations, data object type annotations, case annotations, and enterprise annotations. The IPAM server also supports form-based annotations.
In an embodiment, the IPAM server has a plug-in manager coupled thereto. Also included may be at least one plug-in coupled to the plug-in manager, and at least one external data processing component coupled to the plug-in. In an embodiment, the external data processing component displays data using at least graphs. In another embodiment, the external data processing component displays data using at least maps. The plug-in manager has a first application programming interface (API), and each external data processing component has a second API. The plug-in translates messages from the plug-in manager to the external data processing component to a format conforming to the second API, and translates messages from the external data processing component to the plug-in manager to a format conforming to the first API.
Embodiments of the IPAM server can process, display, and otherwise operate with patent equivalent text files (EQV) (or other types of files or data) to aid in the merger and acquisition process in different stages, although the invention is not limited to this embodiment. Patent equivalent text files are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,623,681, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. A patent equivalent text file includes equivalency information that establishes an equivalency relationship between the text in the patent equivalent text file and the image in the patent image file. For example, this equivalency information may include pagination information that enables the patent equivalent text file to be displayed having the same pagination (line breaks, column breaks, page breaks) as the patent image file. In an embodiment, a pagination module generates the patent equivalent text file by comparing the patent text in the patent text file with the patent image file to detect equivalency information. This equivalency information is then embedded in the patent equivalent text file, along with the patent text. While the pagination module is capable of performing the pagination operation automatically, in some cases some manual intervention is required. In accordance, an operator is sometimes involved with the pagination process performed by the pagination module.
In the present invention, the IPAM server may be used in conjunction with the tools and methodologies to aid in the merger and acquisition process.
The following describes each tool or method and how it may be combined with the IPAM server to aid in the merger and acquisition process. As each of these tools or methods are described below, an exemplary graphical presentation may be used. It should be noted that the particular exemplary graphical presentation used is for convenience purposes only and the invention is not limited to that particular graphical presentation. For example, a bar chart can be also implemented as a pie chart, radar or spider charts, two or three dimensional graphs, etc., and vice versa.
At times the present invention relates to a portfolio. Although the present invention is described with reference to a patent portfolio, the present invention is not limited to patents. In fact, the present invention applies to any item that another party may take a license for, including trademarks, software programs, know-how (e.g., trade secrets) and so forth.
The same tool may be used in different ways to facilitate different stages in the merger and acquisition process. Other uses of tools will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art(s) based on the teachings contained herein.
Referring to
A. Tool 1 and the Identify Targets Stage and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage
In
In one embodiment of the present invention, Tool 1 uses Cartia's ThemeScape to create the topographic map 202 and thus create conceptual visualizations of dominance or area of focus. The x-y plane shows related concepts in relative proximity. In the z-axis, forming mountains and valleys, is the frequency of concepts represented in the patent group. How the IPAM server works in conjunction with the topographic map 202 to aid in the identify potential targets stage 102 and the evaluate/analyze stage 104 is described next with reference to
In
In step 402, in an embodiment of the present invention a user performs one or more searches on U.S. patents portfolio to identify products, uses and technologies covered in Company A's patent portfolio. Here, because the user is just pointing at a broad field, the abstract of each patent is typically the section that is searched, but is not limited to this. The present invention is not limited to doing the search on U.S. patents (this is also true for all of the searches discussed herein). Here, the search performed is typically, but is not limited to, a boolean and/or natural language search on the product, use and/or technology to produce a group of patents that identify products, uses and/or technologies covered in Company A's patent portfolio. The user interface of the IPAM server is described in detail in the patent and applications referenced above in the section entitled “Cross-Reference to Other Patents and Applications.” For illustration,
In step 404, the IPAM server is used to produce one or more of topographic map 202 (on desired search groups) having a map with contours and labels indicating areas related to the products, uses and/or technologies searched in step 402. Here, the group of patents produced in step 402 is further divided into subgroups, with each subgroup relating to a different product, use and/or technology. Typically, this is done by the user selecting a topographic map function on the computer screen. The topographic map 202 produced by Tool 1 (
In step 406, the user company studies the topographic map 202 produced by Tool 1 and determines whether the exact area of the product, use and/or technology is included in the topographic map 202. If the outcome to step 406 is positive, then control passes to step 410. Alternatively, control passes to step 408.
In step 408, an area related to the product, use and/or technology was not included in the topographic map 202. Here, the user can determine if another area that is shown in the topographic map 202 is worth further exploration. Control then passes to step 410.
In step 410, the user selects the contour (or label) of interest in the topographic map 202. This is typically done by the user “clicking” on the contour of interest. Control then passes to step 412.
In step 412, the IPAM server processes the subgroup of U.S. patents that are included in the contour of interest indicated by the user in step 410. Again, topographic map 202 is displayed with contours, but this time the topographic map 202 is more specific to exactly the user's contour (or area) of interest. Now, the topographic map 202 shows the different types of products, uses and/or technologies that are in the contour of interest. At this point, the user may use the IPAM server as described in detail in the applications and patents referenced above in the section entitled “Cross-Reference to Other Patents and Applications.” Here, flowchart 400 ends.
B. Tool 2 and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage and the Negotiation Stage
In
C. Tool 3 and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage and the Negotiation Stage
In
D. Tool 3a and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage and the Negotiation Stage
In
Referring to
In
In step 804, the IPAM server takes the group of patents produced in step 802 and further divides it into subgroups, with each subgroup having the same technology classification. When the search in step 802 is on the group of U.S. patents, the classification used is the U.S. Patent Classification designated by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. In a similar manner, if the search in step 802 is on the group of International patents, then the classification used would be the IPC classification. The IPAM server may store the U.S. Patent Classification (or IPC classification) in a meta-data field that will also need to be searched to determine the technology classification, but is not limited to this. Exemplary screen shots of the user interface of the IPAM server to assist the user company in searches relating to U.S. Patent Classifications are shown in
In step 806, the IPAM server is used in conjunction with a technology classification 204 to create a graphical representation of similar technologies. The technology classification 204 produced by Tool 17 (
Referring to
Referring to
In
In step 1004, the IPAM server takes the group of patents produced in step 1002 and further divides it into subgroups, with each subgroup having the same technology classification. When the search in step 1002 is on U.S. patents, the classification used is the U.S. Patent Classification designated by the U.S. patent and Trademark Office. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) classification codes are provided by the U.S. Department of Commerce. In a similar manner, if the search in step 1002 is on the International patents and applications, then the classification used would be the IPC classification. The IPAM server may store the U.S. Patent Classification and IPC classification each as a meta-data field that will also need to be searched to determine the technology classification, but is not limited to this. Control then passes to step 1006.
In step 1006, each U.S. and IPC classification determined by step 1004 is mapped (e.g., via a look-up table) to its related SIC classification. Control then passes to step 1008.
In step 1008, the IPAM server is used in conjunction with a SIC classification 206 to create a graphical representation of similar industrial markets. Typically, this is done by the user selecting a related market function on the computer screen. The SIC classification 206 produced by Tool 18 (
Referring to
In
In step 1204, the group of patents that resulted from step 1202 are sorted by assignee (to separate Company A's and Company B's patents). Control passes to step 1206.
In step 106, the IPAM server is used in conjunction with radar diagram 208 to create a graphical representation of technology synergy of merger. Flowchart 1200 ends at this point.
Referring to
A. Tool 8a and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage, the Due Diligence Stage, and the Negotiation Stage
In
In step 1404, the IPAM server takes the group of patents produced in step 1402 and further performs a forward citation on each of the patents, that has the same patent class (technology area) of the user company, to create a patent citation tree 210. Forward citations are described in detail in the patent and applications referenced above in the section entitled “Cross-Reference to Other Patents and Applications.” The nodes in the patent citation tree 210 may be color coded (or indicated by another means) by assignee to allow the user to pick out color patterns easily. Exemplary screen shots of the user interface of the IPAM server to assist the user company in searches relating to forward citation are shown in
B. Tool 8b and the Negotiation Stage
This is a powerful visualization tool for the negotiation team. It shows the other side the depth of the analysis and the value of the patent under discussion. The patent citation tree 210 also identifies for the negotiation team how fast the technical area is moving and how many companies are involved. In addition, it visually shows the uniqueness of the patent under discussion, and from the richness of the tree, how valuable it is. How the IPAM server works in conjunction with Tool 8b is similar to Tool 8a, as described above with reference to
C. Tool 8c and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage, the Due Diligence Stage, and the Negotiation Stage
In addition, the patent citation tree 210 produced by Tool 8c shows how unique, mature, expansive, and inner-related the technology is that stems from the patent being evaluated. When dates are put in the nodes, it also shows the merger and acquisition team how fast moving the various branches of the tree are growing. How the IPAM server works in conjunction with Tool 8c is similar to Tool 8a, as described above with reference to
Referring to
This tool utilizes a technique that involves going back one or more generations from a given patent, and then performing forward citations on the prior generations. This identifies a patent family that is a result of a unique combination of backwards and forwards citation processing. The resulting tree indicates who is involved, and which fields are probably around the base patent. It's an approach to look into the future of a given technology (how the technology may develop in the future). Date contours (or contours according to some other criteria) is also applicable with this tool (and with all hyperbolic trees generated by the invention).
A. Tool 10a and the Due Diligence Stage and the Negotiation Stage
In
In step 1804, the IPAM server determines the prior generation patent of each patent produced in step 1802 (e.g., goes back one citation for each patent). Exemplary screen shots of the user interface of the IPAM server to assist the user company in searches relating to reverse citation are shown in
In step 1806, the IPAM server takes the group of patents produced in step 1804 and further performs three forward citations on each of the patents to create a citation root tree 212. The nodes in the citation root tree 212 may be color coded by assignee to allow the user to pick out color patterns easily. Exemplary screen shots of the user interface of the IPAM server to assist the user company in searches relating to forward citation are shown in
B. Tool 10b and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage, the Due Diligence Stage and the Negotiation Stage
Referring to
In
In step 2104, one forward citation is performed on each patent produced in step 2102. Control passes to step 2106.
In step 2106, the patents are sorted by assignee to produce the citation count report 214 requested by the user. It is also useful to sort by citation count. Flowchart 2100 ends at this point.
Referring to
A. Tool 5 and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage and the Due Diligence Stage
In
In step 2304, the patents are sorted by year cited to produce the citation frequency graph 216 requested by the user. Flowchart 2300 ends at this point.
B. Tool 9 and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage and the Due Diligence Stage
Referring to
In addition,
A. Tool 6 and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage and the Due Diligence Stage
In
In step 2704, the patents from step 2702 are sorted by patent number. Control passes to step 2706.
In step 2706, the patents in each resulting subgroup are sorted by year to produce the citation frequency report 218 requested by the user. Flowchart 2700 ends at this point.
B. Tool 7 and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage and the Due Diligence Stage
Referring to
A. Tool 12a and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage, the Due Diligence Stage and the Negotiation Stage
In
In step 3004, the patents from step 3002 are sorted by year to produce the patent count/year 220 requested by the user. Flowchart 3000 ends at this point.
B. Tool 12b and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage and the Due Diligence Stage
C. Tool 13 and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage, the Due Diligence Stage and the Negotiation Stage
Referring to
In
In step 3404, the group of published applications that results from step 3402 is further divided into subgroups by assignee/company (the group may contain multiple assignees). Control then passes to step 3406.
In step 3406, the IPAM server is used in conjunction with recent patent applications chart 222 to create a chart that indicates the top assignees/companies in a related area to the product, use and/or technology searched in step 3402. Here, the group of patents produced in step 3402 may be further divided into subgroups, with each subgroup having published applications filed in the same year and related to the idea to produce the application count/year 222 requested by the user. At this point flowchart 3400 ends.
Referring to
A. Tool 15 and the Due Diligence Stage and the Negotiation Stage
In
In step 3604, the IPAM server sorts the patents in the resulting group from step 3602 by years to expire to produce the patent aging graph 224 requested by the user. At this point flowchart 3600 ends.
B. Tool 16 and the Due Diligence Stage and the Negotiation Stage
Referring to
In
In step 3904, the IPAM server sorts the patents in the resulting group from step 3902 by primary class/subclass to produce the U.S. primary class/subclass 226 requested by the user. At this point flowchart 3900 ends.
Referring to
In
In step 4104, the IPAM server sorts the patents in the resulting group from step 4102 by international class to produce the international patent class 228 requested by the user. At this point flowchart 4100 ends.
Referring to
A. Tool 20 and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage and the Negotiation Stage
In
In step 4304, the IPAM server sorts the patents in the resulting group from step 4302 by number of patents. In an embodiment of the present invention, the IPAM server may also sort each resulting subgroup by number of patents. At this point flowchart 4300 ends.
B. Tool 23 and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage and the Negotiation Stage
Referring to
A. Tool 24 and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage
In
In step 4704, the IPAM server sorts the patents in the resulting grouping (or in each resulting subgroup) from step 4704 by number of patents. Control passes to step 4706.
In step 4706, the IPAM server selects the top 15-20 assignees to produce the patent count graph by number of patents 232 requested by the user. At this point flowchart 4700 ends.
B. Tool 21 and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage
Referring to
A. Tool 22 and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage
In
In step 4904, the IPAM server sorts the patents in the resulting group from step 4902 by patent count. Control then passes to step 4906.
In step 4906, the IPAM server determines the percentage of total patents for the top 15-20 assignees produced in step 4904 to produce the top assignees primary class/subclass by percent of total 234 requested by the user. At this point flowchart 4900 ends.
B. Tool 25 and the Evaluate/Analyze Stage
Referring to
In
In step 5204, the IPAM server sorts the patents in the resulting group from step 5202 by year to create subgroups of patents. Control passes to step 5206.
In step 5206, the IPAM server, for each patent in each of the subgroups created in step 5204, subtracts the patent's issue date from its filing date. Control then passes to step 5208.
In step 5208, the IPAM server calculates, for each subgroup of patents, the average prosecution time for its patents and displays the results to the user to produce the months to issue 236 requested by the user. Flowchart 5200 ends at this point.
Referring to
In
In step 5404, the IPAM server is used in conjunction with the features grouping chart 204 to create a chart showing groupings of product and/or service features. Flowchart 5400 ends at this point.
Referring to
In
In step 5604, the IPAM server allows the user to make and store annotations on one or more of the patents and/or corporate documents in the group produced by step 5602. Flowchart 5600 ends at this point.
Referring to
A. Tool 27 and the Evaluate/analyze Stage, the Due Diligence Stage and the Negotiation Stage
In
In step 5804, the IPAM server sorts the group of resulting patents and/or corporate documents by inventor and number of patents to produce the inventor patent count/assignee 242 requested by the user. Flowchart 5800 ends at this point.
B. Tool 28 and the Evaluate/analyze Stage, the Due Diligence Stage and the Negotiation Stage
Referring to
In
In step 6104, the IPAM server generates an inventor patent count graph 244 that indicates the top inventors in Company A. Here, the group of patents produced in step 6102 are further subdivided into subgroups by inventor and number of patents. As with assignee information, the IPAM server may store the inventor information of patents in a meta-data field that will also need to be searched to determine the inventor information, but is not limited to this. Flowchart 6100 ends at this point.
Referring to
In
In step 6304, the IPAM server determines the number of inventors for each patent in the resulting group of patents from step 6302. As with assignee information, the IPAM server may store the inventor information of patents in a meta-data field that will also need to be searched to determine the inventor information, but is not limited to this. Flowchart 6300 ends at this point.
It is important to note that most, if not all, of the tools or methods described above may be combined to interactively go back and forth between different tools. The integration of tools discussed herein to facilitate the merger and acquisition process is limitless.
While various application embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments.
Germeraad, Paul B., Rivette, Kevin G., Rappaport, Irving S., Hohmann, Luke, Heaton, Sheryl A.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 10013726, | Aug 26 2009 | IVP HOLDINGS III, LLC | Acquiring intellectual property assets |
| 10262028, | Jun 29 2001 | Simultaneous intellectual property search and valuation system and methodology (SIPS-VSM) | |
| 10311085, | Aug 31 2012 | NETSEER, INC | Concept-level user intent profile extraction and applications |
| 10387892, | May 06 2008 | NETSEER, INC | Discovering relevant concept and context for content node |
| 10860619, | Aug 31 2012 | Netseer, Inc. | Concept-level user intent profile extraction and applications |
| 10984476, | Aug 23 2017 | IO STRATEGIES LLC | Method and apparatus for determining inventor impact |
| 10990893, | Aug 28 2001 | Search results based on a conformance analysis of analysis references that form a library of agreements, in which each analysis reference corresponds to an agreement and indicates intellectual property document | |
| 11069011, | Aug 26 2009 | IVP HOLDINGS III, LLC | Acquiring intellectual property assets |
| 11475465, | May 06 2008 | Netseer, Inc. | Discovering relevant concept and context for content node |
| 8090683, | Feb 23 2009 | AUTONOMY, INC | Managing workflow communication in a distributed storage system |
| 8103709, | Aug 28 2001 | Computer-implemented method and system for managing attributes of intellectual property documents, optionally including organization thereof | |
| 8103710, | Aug 28 2001 | Computer-implemented method and system for managing attributes of intellectual property documents, optionally including organization thereof | |
| 8145598, | Feb 23 2009 | AUTONOMY, INC | Methods and systems for single instance storage of asset parts |
| 8145634, | Jan 29 2002 | National Instruments Corporation | Patent marking system |
| 8397051, | Feb 23 2009 | AUTONOMY, INC | Hybrid hash tables |
| 8806175, | Feb 23 2009 | LONGSAND LIMITED | Hybrid hash tables |
| 8825654, | May 10 2005 | NETSEER, INC | Methods and apparatus for distributed community finding |
| 8838605, | May 10 2005 | NETSEER, INC | Methods and apparatus for distributed community finding |
| 8843434, | Feb 28 2006 | NETSEER, INC | Methods and apparatus for visualizing, managing, monetizing, and personalizing knowledge search results on a user interface |
| 8904306, | Jun 12 2008 | T-MOBILE INNOVATIONS LLC | Variable speed scrolling |
| 9110971, | Feb 03 2010 | Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH | Method and system for ranking intellectual property documents using claim analysis |
| 9110985, | Oct 16 2009 | NETSEER, INC | Generating a conceptual association graph from large-scale loosely-grouped content |
| 9280798, | Apr 02 2009 | Method and system for facilitating the review of electronic documents | |
| 9443018, | Jan 19 2006 | NETSEER, INC | Systems and methods for creating, navigating, and searching informational web neighborhoods |
| 9454731, | Aug 28 2001 | Computer-implemented method and system for automated patentability and/or design around claim charts with context associations | |
| 9460396, | Aug 28 2001 | Computer-implemented method and system for automated validity and/or invalidity claim charts with context associations | |
| 9547287, | Aug 28 2001 | System and method for analyzing library of legal analysis charts | |
| 9569721, | Aug 28 2001 | Computer-implemented method and system for automated infringement and non-infringement claim charts with context associations | |
| 9817902, | Oct 27 2006 | NETSEER, INC | Methods and apparatus for matching relevant content to user intention |
| 9858255, | Aug 28 2001 | Computer-implemented method and system for automated claim construction charts with context associations |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 4205780, | Mar 21 1977 | BANCTEC, INC | Document processing system and method |
| 4270182, | Dec 30 1974 | Automated information input, storage, and retrieval system | |
| 4486857, | Oct 06 1982 | QUICKVIEW SYSTEMS, INC | Display system for the suppression and regeneration of characters in a series of fields in a stored record |
| 4533910, | Nov 02 1982 | Cadtrak Corporation | Graphics display system with viewports of arbitrary location and content |
| 4555775, | Oct 07 1982 | UNIX SYSTEMS LABORATORIES, INC | Dynamic generation and overlaying of graphic windows for multiple active program storage areas |
| 4613946, | Jun 07 1984 | EXPERT CHOICE, INC | Method and apparatus for generating hierarchical displays |
| 4622545, | Sep 30 1982 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for image compression and manipulation |
| 4686590, | Jun 29 1984 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Apparatus for positioning a magnetic head |
| 4716476, | Feb 05 1985 | Sony Corporation | Tape recording apparatus |
| 4719523, | May 28 1985 | Sony Corporation | Synchronizing signal detecting circuit |
| 4736308, | Sep 06 1984 | QUICKVIEW SYSTEMS INCORPORATED | Search/retrieval system |
| 4748618, | May 21 1986 | Telcordia Technologies, Inc | Telecommunications interface |
| 4752889, | Aug 18 1986 | HNC SOFTWARE INC | Dynamic, interactive display system for a knowledge base |
| 4772882, | Jul 18 1986 | AD TECHNOLOGIES LLC | Cursor controller user interface system |
| 4785408, | Mar 11 1985 | Avaya Technology Corp | Method and apparatus for generating computer-controlled interactive voice services |
| 4788538, | Nov 17 1986 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining boundaries of graphic regions |
| 4812834, | Aug 01 1985 | Cadtrak Corporation | Graphics display system with arbitrary overlapping viewports |
| 4847604, | Aug 27 1987 | Method and apparatus for identifying features of an image on a video display | |
| 4868733, | Mar 27 1985 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Document filing system with knowledge-base network of concept interconnected by generic, subsumption, and superclass relations |
| 4873623, | Apr 30 1985 | TENCOR INSTRUMENTS A CA CORP | Process control interface with simultaneously displayed three level dynamic menu |
| 4884223, | Jul 05 1985 | Hybond, Inc. | Dynamic force measurement system |
| 4899136, | Apr 28 1986 | Xerox Corporation | Data processor having a user interface display with metaphoric objects |
| 4914732, | Oct 16 1985 | GE SECURITY, INC | Electronic key with interactive graphic user interface |
| 4931783, | Jul 26 1988 | Apple Inc | Method and apparatus for removable menu window |
| 4935865, | Jun 02 1988 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air | Computer controlled electropolishing system |
| 4939507, | Apr 28 1986 | Xerox Corporation | Virtual and emulated objects for use in the user interface of a display screen of a display processor |
| 4959769, | Oct 03 1983 | CASCABEL RESEARCH LLC | Structures and methods for representing and processing documents |
| 4977455, | Jul 15 1988 | STARSIGHT TELECAST, INC | System and process for VCR scheduling |
| 4985863, | Aug 23 1985 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Document storage and retrieval system |
| 4991087, | Aug 19 1987 | Method of using signature subsets for indexing a textual database | |
| 5008853, | Dec 02 1987 | XEROX CORPORATION, A CORP OF NY | Representation of collaborative multi-user activities relative to shared structured data objects in a networked workstation environment |
| 5021989, | Apr 28 1986 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Document browsing apparatus with concurrent processing and retrievel |
| 5029013, | Nov 26 1987 | Sony Corporation | Apparatus for editing video tapes |
| 5062060, | Jan 05 1987 | Motorola Inc | Computer human interface comprising user-adjustable window for displaying or printing information |
| 5072412, | Mar 25 1987 | Technology Licensing Corporation | User interface with multiple workspaces for sharing display system objects |
| 5120944, | Oct 10 1989 | Unisys Corporation | Image-based document processing system providing enhanced workstation balancing |
| 5142674, | Mar 08 1988 | International Business Machines Corporation | Interchange object data base index which eliminates the need for private copies of interchange documents files by a plurality of application programs |
| 5148154, | Dec 04 1990 | Sony Electronics INC | Multi-dimensional user interface |
| 5155806, | Mar 15 1989 | Sun Microsystems, Inc | Method and apparatus for displaying context sensitive help information on a display |
| 5157768, | Mar 15 1989 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for displaying context sensitive help information on a display |
| 5163104, | Feb 24 1988 | RECOGNITION INTERNATIONAL INC | Digital image processing technique including improved gray scale compression |
| 5179643, | Dec 23 1988 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method of multi-dimensional analysis and display for a large volume of record information items and a system therefor |
| 5183404, | Apr 08 1992 | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | Systems for connection of physical/electrical media connectors to computer communications cards |
| 5206830, | Jul 06 1988 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Refresh control circuit of pseudo static random access memory and pseudo static random access memory apparatus |
| 5222160, | Dec 28 1989 | PFU Limited | Document revising system for use with document reading and translating system |
| 5228123, | Jan 04 1990 | Interface and application development management system based on a gene metaphor | |
| 5237158, | Oct 10 1989 | Unisys Corporation | Image-based document processing system providing for priority document shipment |
| 5241671, | Oct 26 1989 | ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA, INC | Multimedia search system using a plurality of entry path means which indicate interrelatedness of information |
| 5251294, | Feb 07 1990 | WEBVENTION GROUP LLC | Accessing, assembling, and using bodies of information |
| 5253362, | Jan 29 1990 | Eclipsys Corporation | Method for storing, retrieving, and indicating a plurality of annotations in a data cell |
| 5276616, | Oct 16 1989 | SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA, 22-22 NAGAIKE-CHO, ABENO-KU, OSAKA-SHI, OSAKA-FU, JAPAN | Apparatus for automatically generating index |
| 5283894, | Apr 11 1986 | Lockless concurrent B-tree index meta access method for cached nodes | |
| 5319745, | Sep 16 1991 | Aerospatiale Societe Nationale Industrielle | Method and apparatus for processing alphanumeric and graphic information to create a data base |
| 5327235, | Feb 17 1992 | Sony United Kingdom Limited | Video conversions of video signal formats |
| 5334030, | Jun 01 1992 | National Semiconductor Corporation | PCMCIA bus extender card for PCMCIA system development |
| 5349170, | Oct 10 1989 | Unisys Corporation | Image-based document processing system providing enhanced transaction balancing |
| 5353059, | Jan 09 1992 | Sony United Kingdom Limited | Data error concealment |
| 5359428, | Jun 28 1991 | SONY CORPORATION A CORP OF JAPAN | Digital video recorder operable in standard and long play modes |
| 5359508, | May 21 1993 | Data collection and retrieval system for registering charges and royalties to users | |
| 5381175, | Apr 10 1992 | Sony Corporation | Apparatus for correcting for defective pixels in an image sensor |
| 5392428, | Jun 28 1991 | Text analysis system | |
| 5402336, | Jan 15 1993 | SS&D Corporation | System and method for allocating resources of a retailer among multiple wholesalers |
| 5404295, | Aug 16 1990 | Method and apparatus for utilizing annotations to facilitate computer retrieval of database material | |
| 5404514, | Dec 26 1989 | Method of indexing and retrieval of electronically-stored documents | |
| 5428778, | Feb 13 1992 | Oracle America, Inc | Selective dissemination of information |
| 5430681, | May 08 1989 | Hitachi Maxell, Ltd.; Hitachi, Ltd. | Memory cartridge and its memory control method |
| 5432897, | Apr 30 1992 | Intellectual Ventures I LLC | Method and an apparatus for editing tree structures in display |
| 5434962, | Sep 07 1990 | Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. | Method and system for automatically generating logical structures of electronic documents |
| 5440481, | Oct 28 1992 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | System and method for database tomography |
| 5442778, | Nov 12 1991 | XEROX CORPORATION, A CORP OF NY | Scatter-gather: a cluster-based method and apparatus for browsing large document collections |
| 5444615, | Mar 24 1993 | Engate LLC | Attorney terminal having outline preparation capabilities for managing trial proceeding |
| 5444779, | Oct 18 1993 | Xerox Corporation | Electronic copyright royalty accounting system using glyphs |
| 5452018, | Apr 19 1991 | Sony Electronics Inc. | Digital color correction system having gross and fine adjustment modes |
| 5481666, | Aug 25 1993 | Apple Inc | Object-oriented navigation system |
| 5511186, | Nov 18 1992 | MDL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC | System and methods for performing multi-source searches over heterogeneous databases |
| 5519857, | Jun 14 1989 | GOOGLE LLC | Hierarchical presearch type text search method and apparatus and magnetic disk unit used in the apparatus |
| 5530520, | Dec 15 1994 | Xerox Corporation | Method of allocating copyright revenues arising from reprographic device use |
| 5537526, | Nov 12 1993 | Apple Inc | Method and apparatus for processing a display document utilizing a system level document framework |
| 5540597, | Dec 15 1993 | LENOVO SINGAPORE PTE LTD | All flex PCMCIA-format cable |
| 5544302, | Jun 03 1993 | Apple Inc | Object-oriented framework for creating and using container objects with built-in properties |
| 5544352, | Jun 14 1993 | Software Rights Archive, LLC | Method and apparatus for indexing, searching and displaying data |
| 5550976, | Dec 08 1992 | NMETRIC, LLC | Decentralized distributed asynchronous object oriented system and method for electronic data management, storage, and communication |
| 5551055, | Dec 23 1992 | Apple Inc | System for providing locale dependent user interface for presenting control graphic which has different contents or same contents displayed in a predetermined order |
| 5553216, | Feb 26 1993 | Fujitsu Limited | Structured database system together with structure definition frame storing document body data |
| 5557722, | Jul 19 1991 | ENIGMA INFORMATION SYSTEMS LTD | Data processing system and method for representing, generating a representation of and random access rendering of electronic documents |
| 5557785, | Dec 03 1992 | Alcatel Alsthom Compagnie Generale D'Electricite | Object oriented multimedia information system using information and multiple classes to manage data having various structure and dedicated data managers |
| 5559942, | May 10 1993 | Apple Computer, Inc | Method and apparatus for providing a note for an application program |
| 5568639, | Nov 24 1993 | Menai Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing an object-oriented file structuring system on a computer |
| 5576954, | Nov 05 1993 | University of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc | Process for determination of text relevancy |
| 5581686, | Apr 15 1994 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Method and system for in-place interaction with contained objects |
| 5583982, | Dec 23 1992 | Apple Inc | Dialog system |
| 5584035, | Jul 31 1990 | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | Object based system comprising user interface permitting manipulation of objects by users |
| 5592607, | Oct 15 1993 | Xerox Corporation | Interactive method and system for producing address-correlated information using user-specified address zones |
| 5592608, | Oct 15 1993 | Xerox Corporation | Interactively producing indices into image and gesture-based data using unrecognized graphical objects |
| 5594837, | Nov 29 1993 | 7 DEGREES, INC | Method for representation of knowledge in a computer as a network database system |
| 5596700, | Feb 17 1993 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for annotating software windows |
| 5604901, | Apr 13 1992 | International Business Machines Corporation | Interrogation index file comparison |
| 5615112, | Jan 29 1993 | Arizona Board of Regents; Toshiba Corporation | Synthesized object-oriented entity-relationship (SOOER) model for coupled knowledge-base/database of image retrieval expert system (IRES) |
| 5615328, | Aug 30 1995 | LENOVO SINGAPORE PTE LTD | PCMCIA SRAM card function using DRAM technology |
| 5615362, | Aug 02 1993 | Progress Software Corporation | Method and apparatus for managing relational data in an object cache |
| 5619632, | Sep 14 1994 | SAP America, Inc | Displaying node-link structure with region of greater spacings and peripheral branches |
| 5623679, | Nov 18 1994 | DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | System and method for creating and manipulating notes each containing multiple sub-notes, and linking the sub-notes to portions of data objects |
| 5623681, | Nov 19 1993 | DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | Method and apparatus for synchronizing, displaying and manipulating text and image documents |
| 5628003, | Aug 23 1985 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Document storage and retrieval system for storing and retrieving document image and full text data |
| 5630125, | May 23 1994 | Method and apparatus for information management using an open hierarchical data structure | |
| 5632031, | Mar 28 1991 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and means for encoding storing and retrieving hierarchical data processing information for a computer system |
| 5634012, | Nov 23 1994 | CONTENTGUARD HOLDINGS, INC | System for controlling the distribution and use of digital works having a fee reporting mechanism |
| 5634051, | Oct 28 1993 | SOPHEON CORPORATION | Information management system |
| 5638519, | May 20 1994 | Thomas & Betts International LLC | Electronic method and system for controlling and tracking information related to business transactions |
| 5642502, | Dec 06 1994 | University of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc | Method and system for searching for relevant documents from a text database collection, using statistical ranking, relevancy feedback and small pieces of text |
| 5692176, | Nov 22 1993 | RELX INC | Associative text search and retrieval system |
| 5696963, | Nov 18 1994 | DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | System, method and computer program product for searching through an individual document and a group of documents |
| 5721910, | Jun 04 1996 | Exxon Research and Engineering Company | Relational database system containing a multidimensional hierachical model of interrelated subject categories with recognition capabilities |
| 5732216, | Oct 02 1996 | PERSONAL AUDIO LLC | Audio message exchange system |
| 5748956, | Jan 13 1995 | COMCAST MO GROUP, INC | Method and system for managing multimedia assets for proper deployment on interactive networks |
| 5754840, | Jan 23 1996 | F POSZAT HU, L L C | System, method, and computer program product for developing and maintaining documents which includes analyzing a patent application with regards to the specification and claims |
| 5761497, | Nov 22 1993 | RELX INC | Associative text search and retrieval system that calculates ranking scores and window scores |
| 5765152, | Oct 13 1995 | DIGIMARC CORPORATION AN OREGON CORPORATION | System and method for managing copyrighted electronic media |
| 5774833, | Dec 08 1995 | Motorola, Inc.; Motorola, Inc | Method for syntactic and semantic analysis of patent text and drawings |
| 5787424, | Nov 30 1995 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP | Process and system for recursive document retrieval |
| 5794257, | Jul 14 1995 | Siemens Corporation | Automatic hyperlinking on multimedia by compiling link specifications |
| 5799325, | Nov 18 1994 | DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | System, method, and computer program product for generating equivalent text files |
| 5806079, | Nov 18 1994 | DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | System, method, and computer program product for using intelligent notes to organize, link, and manipulate disparate data objects |
| 5808615, | May 01 1996 | ENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LP | Process and system for mapping the relationship of the content of a collection of documents |
| 5809318, | Nov 18 1994 | DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | Method and apparatus for synchronizing, displaying and manipulating text and image documents |
| 5826252, | Jun 28 1996 | General Electric Company | System for managing multiple projects of similar type using dynamically updated global database |
| 5832476, | Jun 29 1994 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Document searching method using forward and backward citation tables |
| 5848409, | Nov 18 1994 | DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | System, method and computer program product for maintaining group hits tables and document index tables for the purpose of searching through individual documents and groups of documents |
| 5870770, | Jun 07 1995 | GOOGLE LLC | Document research system and method for displaying citing documents |
| 5875431, | Mar 15 1996 | Legal strategic analysis planning and evaluation control system and method | |
| 5892900, | Aug 30 1996 | INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES CORP | Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection |
| 5918236, | Jun 28 1996 | Oracle International Corporation | Point of view gists and generic gists in a document browsing system |
| 5924090, | May 01 1997 | NORTHERN LIGHT TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC | Method and apparatus for searching a database of records |
| 5933841, | May 17 1996 | RPX Corporation | Structured document browser |
| 5950214, | Nov 19 1993 | DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | System, method, and computer program product for accessing a note database having subnote information for the purpose of manipulating subnotes linked to portions of documents |
| 5963941, | Sep 19 1990 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Information collection system connected to a communication network for collecting desired information in a desired form |
| 5990897, | Sep 12 1997 | Methods for automatically generating a three-dimensional geometric solid from two-dimensional view sets including automatic segregation of open, closed and disjoint curves into views using their center of gravity | |
| 5991751, | Jun 02 1997 | DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | System, method, and computer program product for patent-centric and group-oriented data processing |
| 5999907, | Dec 06 1993 | CALLAHAN CELLULAR L L C | Intellectual property audit system |
| 6003033, | Feb 28 1992 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for describing and creating a user defined arbitrary data structure corresponding to a tree in a computer memory |
| 6006257, | Sep 29 1995 | MAVENIR, INC | Multimedia architecture for interactive advertising in which secondary programming is varied based upon viewer demographics and content of primary programming |
| 6041323, | Apr 17 1996 | International Business Machines Corporation | Information search method, information search device, and storage medium for storing an information search program |
| 6067528, | Jun 21 1996 | CBEX, INC | Confidential market making system |
| 6078913, | Feb 12 1997 | KDDI Corporation | Document retrieval apparatus |
| 6151595, | Apr 17 1998 | Xerox Corporation | Methods for interactive visualization of spreading activation using time tubes and disk trees |
| 6169995, | Mar 17 1994 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Link information maintenance management method |
| 6175824, | Jul 14 1999 | CHI Research, Inc. | Method and apparatus for choosing a stock portfolio, based on patent indicators |
| 6279014, | Sep 15 1997 | FUJI XEROX CO , LTD ; Xerox Corporation | Method and system for organizing documents based upon annotations in context |
| 6282545, | Oct 28 1993 | International Business Machines Corporation | Mechanism for information extraction and traversal from an object base including a plurality of object classes |
| 6339767, | Jun 02 1997 | DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | Using hyperbolic trees to visualize data generated by patent-centric and group-oriented data processing |
| 6389434, | Nov 19 1993 | DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | System, method, and computer program product for creating subnotes linked to portions of data objects after entering an annotation mode |
| 6393406, | Oct 03 1995 | EDER, JEFFREY | Method of and system for valving elements of a business enterprise |
| 6460034, | May 21 1997 | Oracle International Corporation | Document knowledge base research and retrieval system |
| 6499026, | Jun 02 1997 | DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | Using hyperbolic trees to visualize data generated by patent-centric and group-oriented data processing |
| 6556992, | Sep 14 1999 | PatentRatings, LLC | Method and system for rating patents and other intangible assets |
| 6581039, | Nov 23 1999 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Report searching in a merger and acquisition environment |
| 6963920, | Nov 19 1993 | DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | Intellectual asset protocol for defining data exchange rules and formats for universal intellectual asset documents, and systems, methods, and computer program products related to same |
| 7437471, | Nov 19 1993 | DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | Intellectual asset protocol for defining data exchange rules and formats for universal intellectual asset documents, and systems, methods, and computer program products related to same |
| 7523126, | Jun 02 1997 | DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | Using hyperbolic trees to visualize data generated by patent-centric and group-oriented data processing |
| 20020007373, | |||
| 20020055924, | |||
| 20020077835, | |||
| 20020082778, | |||
| 20030204514, | |||
| 20070078886, | |||
| 20070136116, | |||
| 20070208669, | |||
| EP239884, | |||
| EP694829, | |||
| RE32632, | Jul 19 1982 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Display system |
| WO11575, | |||
| WO52618, | |||
| WO60495, | |||
| WO173657, | |||
| WO9325974, | |||
| WO9414122, | |||
| WO9500896, | |||
| WO9514280, | |||
| WO9816890, | |||
| WO9855945, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Jul 19 2001 | RAPPAPORT, IRVING S | AURIGIN SYSTEMS, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012123 | /0736 | |
| Jul 20 2001 | RIVETTE, KEVIN G | AURIGIN SYSTEMS, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012123 | /0736 | |
| Jul 23 2001 | GERMERAAD, PAUL B | AURIGIN SYSTEMS, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012123 | /0736 | |
| Aug 01 2001 | HEATON, SHERYL ANN | AURIGIN SYSTEMS, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012123 | /0736 | |
| Aug 10 2001 | HOHMANN, LUKE | AURIGIN SYSTEMS, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012123 | /0736 | |
| May 03 2002 | TRANSMERICA BUSINESS CREDIT CORPORATION | MicroPatent, LLC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ERRONEOUS EXCLUSION OF THE LAST PAGE OF THE JUDICIAL RELEASE DOCUMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 015056 FRAME 0512 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT | 027931 | /0388 | |
| May 03 2002 | TRANSMERICA BUSINESS CREDIT CORPORATION | MicroPatent, LLC | JUDICIAL RELEASE OF LIENS, CLAIMS, ENCUMBRANCES AND OTHER INTERESTS | 015056 | /0512 | |
| May 09 2002 | AURIGIN SYSTEMS, INC | MicroPatent, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013193 | /0854 | |
| Mar 23 2004 | MicroPatent, LLC | Rose Blush Software LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 014601 | /0883 | |
| Aug 12 2015 | Rose Blush Software LLC | F POSZAT HU, L L C | MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 037588 | /0355 | |
| Oct 31 2019 | F POSZAT HU, L L C | INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 151 LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 050915 | /0329 | |
| Nov 15 2019 | INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 151 LLC | DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 051409 | /0324 |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Oct 11 2013 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| Oct 16 2017 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
| Dec 27 2021 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
| Jun 13 2022 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| May 11 2013 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Nov 11 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| May 11 2014 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| May 11 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| May 11 2017 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Nov 11 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| May 11 2018 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| May 11 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| May 11 2021 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Nov 11 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| May 11 2022 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| May 11 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |