An operational amplifier includes a first stage and a second stage, the first stage for receiving two input signals and the second stage being coupled to the first stage, wherein the second stage includes a first part with a first output of the operational amplifier, and a second part with a second output of the operational amplifier. A method includes providing a first current to the first part of the second stage, and providing a second current to the second part of the second stage. The method further includes adjusting the first current based on a current consumption of the first part of the second stage, and adjusting the second current based on a current consumption of the second part of the second stage, wherein the sum of the first current and the second current is substantially constant.
|
1. A method for dynamic current compensation in an operational amplifier, wherein the operational amplifier includes a first stage and a second stage, the first stage for receiving two input signals and the second stage being coupled to the first stage, wherein the second stage includes a first part with a first output of the operational amplifier, and a second part with a second output of the operational amplifier, the method comprising:
providing a first current to the first part of the second stage;
providing a second current to the second part of the second stage;
adjusting the first current based on a current consumption of the first part of the second stage; and
adjusting the second current based on a current consumption of the second part of the second stage, wherein the sum of the first current and the second current is substantially constant.
6. An operational amplifier capable of dynamically compensating for varying current needs, comprising:
a first stage configured to receive two input signals;
a second stage coupled to the first stage, wherein the second stage includes a first part with a first output of the operational amplifier, and a second part with a second output of the operational amplifier;
a first current source configured to provide a first bias current for biasing the first part of the second stage, wherein the first bias current is adjusted based on a current consumption of the first part of the second stage; and
a second current source configured to provide a second bias current for biasing the second part of the second stage, wherein the second bias current is adjusted based on a current consumption of the second part of the second stage, and the sum of the first bias current and the second bias current is substantially constant.
20. An integrated circuit configured to dynamically compensate for varying current needs, comprising:
a first stage configured to receive two input signals;
a second stage coupled to the first stage, wherein the second stage includes a first part with a first output of the operational amplifier, and a second part with a second output of the operational amplifier;
a first set of transistors configured to form a first current source to provide a first bias current for biasing the first part of the second stage; and
a second set of transistors configured to form a second current source to provide a second bias current for biasing the second part of the second stage, wherein the first current source is configured to increase the first bias current when the first output of the operational amplifier has a signal that is increasing, and the second current source is configured to increase the second bias current when the second output of the operational amplifier has a signal that is increasing, and wherein the sum of the first bias current and the second bias current is substantially constant.
2. The method as in
3. The method as in
4. The method as in
5. The method as in
7. The operational amplifier as in
8. The operational amplifier as in
9. The operational amplifier as in
10. The operational amplifier as in
11. The operational amplifier as in
wherein an amount of the increase of the first bias current is determined, at least in part, by a voltage drop across the first resistance.
12. The operational amplifier as in
13. The operational amplifier as in
wherein the amount of the increase of the second bias current is substantially determined by a voltage drop across the second resistance.
14. The operational amplifier as in
15. The operational amplifier as in
16. The operational amplifier as in
17. The operational amplifier as in
18. The operational amplifier as in
19. The operational amplifier as in
21. The integrated circuit as in
|
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/960,987, filed Oct. 24, 2007, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for any purpose.
The present disclosure relates generally to circuits and methods for current compensation and, more particularly, to circuits and methods for dynamic current compensation.
Operational amplifiers (op-amps), are one of the most widely used electronic devices. Op-amps can be found in an array of commercial, consumer, and scientific devices. Op-amps may be used, for example, to perform logic operations, e.g., voltage comparisons, as well as mathematical calculations.
Typically, op-amps are direct current (DC) coupled electronic voltage amplifiers having a plurality of inputs and outputs, wherein only one of the outputs is used to drive a load. As illustrated in
In
In its typical use, an op-amp's output is controlled by feeding a portion of the output back to an inverting one of its inputs (negative feedback). In addition, an op-amp may be composed of a plurality of parts (stages), wherein the number of stages in an op-amp is dependent upon the desired application. For example, an op-amp may be composed of input stages, frequency shaping stages, and output stages. Alternatively, an op-amp may be composed of only input and output stages.
Op-amps may be differentiated into several classes based on their input voltage and output current relationships, e.g., class A, class B, class AB, and the like. The class A op-amp has a fixed static load current, resulting in relatively high power consumption and relatively high small-signal linearity. Conversely, the class B op-amp has a zero static load current under average loads, resulting in relatively low power consumption and relatively low small-signal linearity. The class AB op-amp falls between the class A and class B op-amps with regard to power consumption and small-signal linearity. However, the class AB op-amp may be unable to properly control static current at its output stage, resulting in it being prone to various effects from, e.g., manufacturing process, operating voltages, and/or temperature. Additionally, because of fixed bias current, the class AB op-amp's average current consumption cannot be clearly defined, resulting in difficulty estimating the average power consumption.
In one aspect, the present disclosure is directed to a method for dynamic current compensation in an operational amplifier, wherein the operational amplifier includes a first stage and a second stage, the first stage for receiving two input signals and the second stage being coupled to the first stage, wherein the second stage includes a first part with a first output of the operational amplifier, and a second part with a second output of the operational amplifier. The method includes providing a first current to the first part of the second stage and providing a second current to the second part of the second stage. The method further includes adjusting the first current based on a current consumption of the first part of the second stage and adjusting the second current based on a current consumption of the second part of the second stage, wherein the sum of the first current and the second current is substantially constant.
In another aspect, the present disclosure is directed to an operational amplifier capable of dynamically compensating for varying current needs. The operational amplifier includes a first stage configured to receive two input signals and a second stage coupled to the first stage, wherein the second stage includes a first part with a first output of the operational amplifier, and a second part with a second output of the operational amplifier. The operational amplifier further includes a first current source configured to provide a first bias current for biasing the first part of the second stage and a second current source configured to provide a second bias current for biasing the second part of the second stage.
An op-amp may have a characteristic such that the linearity in its output signal decreases when the amplitude of its output signal grows larger. For example, as the output signal amplitude increases, the amount of current consumed by a load coupled to the output stage of an op-amp also increases. At the same time, the output stage of the op-amp may also require higher bias current to match the current consumed by the load due to the increased output signal. A conventional op-amp may be unable to meet such increased current demands at an increased output signal amplitude and, as a result, the output signal may fail to reach a desired level. As a result, the linearity in the output signal may be degraded.
Op-amp 200 may be configured to dynamically compensate for the varying current needs at its output stages, referred to herein as second stages, while still maintaining total current consumption, thus resulting in relatively high large-signal linearity and relatively low average power consumption. The structure and operation of op-amp 200 are described in further detail below.
As shown in
As shown in
Op-amp 200 further includes a second stage for processing the output signals of the first stage, in which op-amp outputs 206 serve as a differential output. As shown in
Op-amp 200 further includes feedback loops comprising resistors 208 and capacitors 210 to facilitate the stable operation of op-amp 200. More specifically, resistor 208a and capacitor 210a are coupled between the drain terminal of transistor 212e and the gate terminal of transistor 212e for feeding back a portion of the output signal to the first stage of op-amp 200. Resistor 208b and capacitor 210b are coupled between the drain terminal of transistor 212f and the gate terminal of transistor 212f for feeding back a portion of the output signal to the first stage of op-amp 200. The feedback loops may facilitate stable operation by, for example, minimizing or preventing a phase margin and/or a gain margin.
The second stage of op-amp 200 also includes CSs 214a, 214b and IB1. Current source IB1 provides current to CSs 214a and 214b, while CSs 214a and 214b respectively provide bias currents to, and act as the loads of, the two common-source amplifiers comprised of transistors 212e and 212f.
After initiation of VDD 202, AC voltage signals may be applied to op-amp inputs 204, which will result in signals at the drain terminals of transistors 212a, 212b (in the form of voltage signals), and an adjustment of the division of the IB0 current between transistors 212a, 212b. For example, in one exemplary embodiment, the input signal at transistor 212a may be an AC voltage signal (S1), and the input signal at transistor 212b may be an inverted voltage signal of S1 (S2), i.e., the phase shift between S1 and S2 is 180 degrees.
As input signals 204a and 204b vary, the currents flowing through transistors 212a and 212b correspondingly vary. Through the load of the first stage, i.e., the common mode feedback loop comprised of transistors 212c and 212d, the current variations are output as voltage signals to the second stage of op-amp 200, i.e., transistors 212e, and 212f. The voltage signals provided to the common-source amplifiers comprised of transistors 212e and 212f, are amplified thereby to form output signals at op-amp outputs 206.
When the output signals at op-amp outputs 206 are relatively small in amplitude, a load coupled to op-amp outputs 206 is driven according to the amplitude of the output signal at op-amp outputs 206. When the output signals at op-amp outputs 206 are relatively large in amplitude, the load attempts to draw a correspondingly large amount of current. At the same time, the common-source amplifiers represented by transistors 212e and 212f also require relatively large amounts of currents. If CSs 214a and 214b cannot meet these current demands, the linearity of output signals at op-amp outputs 206 may be degraded.
Consistent with embodiments of the present invention, CSs 214a and 214b are configured such that when the amplitude of the output signals at op-amp outputs 206 increase, the amount of current provided by the respective CSs 214a or 214b also increases. As a result, the needs of increased current at the second stages of op-amp 200 are dynamically compensated corresponding to the input signals, thereby preserving the linearity of the output signals at op-amp outputs 206. That is, the increase in amplitude of the input signals results in an increase in the amount of current required at the respective second stage of op-amp 200. Additionally, the increase in amplitude of the input signals directs additional current to the output stage of op-amp 200 that requires additional current. In this way, CSs 214a and 214b dynamically compensate for the required current needs of op-amp 200 corresponding to the input signals, thereby preserving the linearity of the output signals at op-amp outputs 206.
In addition, consistent with op-amp outputs 206 serving as a differential output, when the current on op-amp output 206a increases, the current on op-amp output 206b decreases. Likewise, when the current on op-amp output 206b increases, the current on op-amp output 206a decreases. As a result, the total current consumption of op-amp 200 is substantially constant.
Also consistent with embodiments of the present invention, CSs 214a and 214b together provide a substantially constant amount of current, thereby preserving the total amount of current consumption. In one aspect, CS IB1 provides a constant current output, and CSs 214a and 214b share the constant current from IB1 between each other. CSs 214a and 214b are configured such that the currents provided to the common-source amplifiers, represented by transistors 212e and 212f, are the respective currents drawn from current source IB1 multiplied by a constant. The currents provided to transistors 212e and 212f are described in greater detail below.
As illustrated in
Additionally, resistor 302a is electrically coupled between the drain terminal of transistor 212b and the gate terminal of transistor 304c. Resistor 302b is electrically coupled to resistors 302a, 306b, VDD 202, and the source terminals of transistors 304a, 304b, 308a, 308b. Resistor 306a is electrically coupled between the drain terminal of transistor 212a and the gate terminal of transistor 308c. Additionally, the gate terminals of transistors 304a, 304b are both coupled to the drain terminal of transistor 304b.
The value of an IB1-1 current from the source to drain terminals of transistor 304a depends on the gate-to-source voltage drop (VGS) of transistor 304a, which is equal to VGS of transistor 304b. When both of transistors 304a, 304b operate in the saturation mode, the IB1-1 current from the source terminal to the drain terminal of transistor 304a is related to an IB1-2 current from the source terminal to the drain terminal of transistor 304b according to the following equation (1):
In the numerator of equation (1), W and L are the width and length, respectively, of a channel of MOS transistor 304a. In the denominator of equation (1), W and L are the width and length, respectively, of a channel of MOS transistor 304b.
Similarly, the value of an IB1-6 current from the source terminal to the drain terminal of transistor 308a is related to an IB1-5 current from the source terminal to the drain terminal of transistor 308b accordingly to the following equation (2):
In the numerator of equation (2), W and L are the width and length, respectively, of a channel of MOS transistor 308a. In the denominator of equation (2), W and L are the width and length, respectively, of a channel of MOS transistor 308b.
As shown in
In addition, a change in voltage across resistors 302, 306 results in a change in the potential at the gate terminals of transistors 304c, 308c. That is, the currents IB1-2 and IB1-5 are functions of the voltage drops across resistors 302, 306. Because the currents flowing through transistors 304a and 308a to op-amp outputs 206 are a function of the IB1-2 and IB1-5 currents, the IB1-1 and IB1-6 currents are also functions of the voltage drops across resistors 302 and 306. Additionally, as noted above, the amount of IB1-1 and IB1-6 currents directed to op-amp outputs 206 will be substantially determined by the width and length ratios of the channels of the respective transistors 304, 308. As a result, the range of the IB1-1 and IB1-6 currents may be adjusted for desired applications by designing the sizes of the transistors 304 and 308 appropriately.
The operation of the exemplary embodiment of
As shown in
Consistent with the embodiment shown in
When input signals S1 and S2 are relatively small in amplitude, the signals on respective op-amp outputs 206 are relatively small in amplitude as well. Therefore, the current fluctuation at the second stage is relatively small, and the linearity of the signals at op-amp outputs 206 is not a concern. As a result of negative feedback, when, for example, signal S1, i.e., the signal applied to op-amp input 204a, is at a higher potential than S2, i.e., the signal applied to op-amp input 204b, the signal at op-amp output 206b is at a lower potential than the signal at op-amp output 206a.
Under such conditions, the signal output of the first stage at the drain of transistor 212a, which is applied across resistors 306a and 306b, is also lower than the signal at the drain of transistor 212b which is applied across resistors 302a and 302b. As a result, a relatively low bias voltage is applied to the gate of transistor 308c, resulting in the current through transistor 308c, i.e., IB1-5, being relatively low. Because IB1-6 is proportional to IB1-5, IB1-6 is also relatively low. Therefore, the total current supplied to both the load at op-amp output 206b and the common-source amplifier comprised of transistor 212f is relatively low. Conversely, the current IB1-2 and IB1-3 are relatively large due to the relatively large gate voltage of transistor 304c.
Also, continuing this example, when S2 is at a lower potential than S1, the current provided by CS 214a, i.e., IB1-1, is larger than the current provided by CS 214b, i.e., IB1-6, because, as noted above, the sum of IB1-1 and IB1-6 remains constant. Additionally, the sum of the currents through transistors 304c and 308c, i.e., IB1-2 and IB1-5, respectively, remains equal to IB1. Therefore, as IB1-5 increases, IB1-2 correspondingly decreases. Because IB1-1 is proportional to IB1-2, IB1-1 also decreases, resulting in a lower potential signal at op-amp output 206a.
Therefore, the circuit shown in
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the disclosed operational amplifier. Other embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the disclosed apparatus and method. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope being indicated by the following claims and their equivalents.
Chen, Chih-Hung, Kuo, Ming-Ching, Kao, Shiau-Wen
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
8072268, | Jan 22 2009 | LAPIS SEMICONDUCTOR CO , LTD | Operational amplifier |
8207789, | Mar 29 2010 | ABLIC INC | Differential amplifier circuit |
8912849, | Apr 30 2013 | XUESHAN TECHNOLOGIES INC | Adaptive operational amplifier bias current |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
7215199, | Oct 15 2004 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and system for simplifying common mode feedback circuitry in multi-stage operational amplifiers |
20090108934, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jun 18 2008 | KAO, SHIAU-WEN | Industrial Technology Research Institute | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 021221 | /0324 | |
Jun 18 2008 | KUO, MING-CHING | Industrial Technology Research Institute | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 021221 | /0324 | |
Jun 25 2008 | CHEN, CHIH-HUNG | Industrial Technology Research Institute | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 021221 | /0324 | |
Jul 10 2008 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Dec 23 2013 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Dec 22 2017 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Feb 07 2022 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jul 25 2022 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jun 22 2013 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Dec 22 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 22 2014 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jun 22 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jun 22 2017 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Dec 22 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 22 2018 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jun 22 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jun 22 2021 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Dec 22 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 22 2022 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jun 22 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |