An efficient class-G amplifier having multiple rails is configured with parallel class ab amplifiers powered by at least one rail supplying a voltage that can be varied in response to signal characteristics, typically as sensed at an output across a load. In a specific embodiment, an analog-to-digital converter is coupled to a digital signal processor that converts signals into a programmed voltage level for setting the voltage rail.
|
1. A linear signal amplifier for amplifying a signal at a load comprising:
a first power rail;
a second power rail
a first class ab amplifier having a first power supply at the first power rail;
a second class ab amplifier having a second power supply at the second power rail;
a level detector for sensing signal power;
an analog to digital converter for converting an analog output of the level detector to a digitized value representative of the signal power;
a digital signal processor coupled to receive the digitized value and to select a power rail;
a digital to analog converter for setting power level on the second power rail; and
switching means responsive to the power level and coupled to alternately switch input signal paths to output signal paths between the first class ab amplifier and the second class ab amplifier in response to said digital to analog converter.
2. The amplifier according to
3. The amplifier according to
4. The amplifier according to
|
The present application claims benefit under 35 USC 119(e) of U.S. provisional Application No. 60/992,224, filed on Dec. 4, 2007, entitled “Adaptive Rail Amplifier (ARA) Technology,” the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
This invention relates to analog signal amplification and particularly to high-efficiency power amplifiers.
A signal amplifier draws power from a fixed power supply, Vdd commonly referred to as a rail, which is provided by a power source such as battery or a battery followed by a voltage regulator provided for voltage stability. For portable amplifiers, the efficiency of power drawn from the source is very important since an inefficient usage of power can result in a rapid drain of the battery resulting in short operating times between recharging or replacement. The ratio of the power delivered to the load Pload, to the power drawn from the battery (Pbatt) is the measure of efficiency of the signal amplifier.
ξ=Pload/Pbatt (1)
Some types of amplification techniques (e.g., class D) that have been used to increase efficiency employ a switching device as the amplifier. The switching device typically places constraints on the type of signals for which such amplifiers can be used since the device operation is non-linear. However, the present invention is directed to classes of amplifiers for use for both linear and non-linear signal amplification. Class G amplifiers can be used for both linear and nonlinear applications. Class G amplifiers employ several amplifiers in parallel that operate off of different rail voltages, each of which contribute varying amounts of power to the load depending on the signal level. Such amplifiers are more efficient in power delivery and can be used for linear signal amplification. Class G amplifiers can approach 80-90% peak efficiency compared to class AB amplifiers (64% peak efficiency). In addition, they offer the benefit of better efficiencies at lower power levels, which is important where signals have high peak-to-average ratios.
Conventional implementation of class-G amplifiers fixes the number of parallel amplifiers and operating rail. The voltage rails (VRi, i=amplifier instance) required by the parallel amplifiers are usually provided through separate external power sources or are generated using a single power source employing reactive components (capacitor or inductor) as intermediate power stores for power delivery as required. A capacitive charge pump is one such power store. Reference is made to U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,061,327, 7,061,328, and 7,183,857 for background. The efficiency of a class-G amplifier depends on the number of rails as well as the input signal statistics, such as peak-to-average ratio. The actual value depends on the difference between the rail voltage and the signal threshold at which transitions between different amplifiers occur. Theoretical efficiency of a class-G amplifier approaches 80-90% independent of the load power when the number of rails approaches infinity. However, it is impractical to have large numbers of rails.
According to the invention, an efficient class-G amplifier having multiple rails is configured with parallel class AB amplifiers powered by at least one rail with a voltage that can be varied in response to signal characteristics, typically as sensed at an output across a load. In a specific embodiment, an analog-to-digital converter is coupled to a digital signal processor that converts signals into a programmed voltage level for setting the voltage rail.
The invention will be better understood by reference to the following detailed description in connection with the accompanying drawings.
The present invention can maximize amplifier efficiency over a wide-range of load powers by the technique described herein. Referring to
Referring to
A basic implementation comprises a comparator circuit for the ADC 12 and an accumulator with reset for the DSP 14 having internally a digital threshold comparator for generating a 1-bit signal to switch between two sets of rails 16,18 and 20, 22. Whereas more complexity would be needed to switch between a greater number of rails, in the present invention, only two sets of rails are needed for the voltage range that is determined by the signal conditions.
One of the main advantages of this approach compared to alternatives is the retention of the ability to handle signals which are temporarily higher than the intermediate rail at either voltage VR2 or VR3 without causing distortion, since the highest rail (VR1) amplifier takes over seamlessly, as selected by the DSP 14. Hence, this technique can realize the best efficiency possible with a linear amplifier at all load power levels.
The comparative efficiency of the adaptive rail amplifier according to the invention under various load power conditions is shown in
This invention has been explained with reference to specific embodiments. Other embodiments will be evident to those of ordinary skill in the art. It is therefore not intended that this invention be limited, except as indicated by the appended claims.
Delano, Cary L., North, Brian B., Jayaraman, Arun
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10523164, | Jul 18 2017 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Semiconductor integrated circuit |
8072266, | May 07 2009 | National Semiconductor Corporation | Class G amplifier with improved supply rail transition control |
8674760, | Mar 14 2012 | ANPEC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION | Dynamic power control method and circuit thereof |
9319495, | Aug 06 2013 | NINGBO AURA SEMICONDUCTOR CO , LIMITED | Power amplifier providing high efficiency |
9344102, | Feb 05 2013 | RAYCAN TECHNOLOGY CO , LTD SU ZHOU | Threshold correction method for multi-voltage threshold sampling digitization device |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4030045, | Jul 06 1976 | ITT Corporation | Digital double differential phase-locked loop |
4324950, | Jun 06 1977 | Rockford Corporation | Amplifier for driving electrostatic loudspeakers |
5038325, | Mar 26 1990 | Round Rock Research, LLC | High efficiency charge pump circuit |
5072171, | Jan 23 1990 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | High efficiency power converter employing a synchronized switching system |
5115203, | Jun 25 1990 | Rockwell International Corporation | Digital power amplifier |
5347171, | Oct 15 1992 | Promos Technologies Inc | Efficient negative charge pump |
5491839, | Aug 21 1991 | LS RESEARCH, LLC | System for short range transmission of a plurality of signals simultaneously over the air using high frequency carriers |
5694072, | Aug 28 1995 | DIODES INCORPORATED | Programmable substrate bias generator with current-mirrored differential comparator and isolated bulk-node sensing transistor for bias voltage control |
6107886, | Mar 31 1998 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | High-efficiency power amplifier |
6215356, | Jan 29 1999 | RPX Corporation | Power amplifier arrangement |
6256482, | Apr 07 1997 | Power- conserving drive-modulation method for envelope-elimination-and-restoration (EER) transmitters | |
6304138, | Mar 17 2000 | National Semiconductor Corporation | Audio-frequency power amplifier that utilizes a bridged amplified configuration |
6323729, | Dec 14 1998 | WSOU Investments, LLC | Amplifier arrangement with voltage gain and reduced power consumption |
6417736, | Nov 01 2000 | Lewyn Consulting, Inc.; LEWYN CONSULTING, INC | Multiple-voltage supply power amplifier with dynamic headroom control |
6486733, | Dec 27 2000 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Method and apparatus for high efficiency power amplification |
6504426, | Mar 28 2001 | PICHA, GUY | Methods and systems for power amplifying of signals |
6538514, | May 22 2001 | Elantec Semiconductor, Inc | Compensation method in a class-G amplifier output stage |
6614310, | Oct 31 2001 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Zero-overhead class G amplifier with threshold detection |
6636103, | Apr 18 2001 | ANALOG DEVICES INC | Amplifier system with on-demand power supply boost |
6815988, | Aug 16 2001 | ST Wireless SA | Differential charge pump |
6838942, | Jul 17 2003 | Microchip Technology Incorporated | Efficient class-G amplifier with wide output voltage swing |
6853244, | Jun 24 2003 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Multi-mode multi-amplifier architecture |
6975175, | Aug 16 2001 | III Holdings 6, LLC | Charge pump |
6982600, | Mar 02 2004 | Elantec Semiconductor, Inc. | Class G-amplifiers |
6987417, | Jun 24 2003 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Polar and linear amplifier system |
6993302, | Jan 15 2002 | Class-L power-output amplifier | |
6998914, | Nov 21 2003 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Multiple polar amplifier architecture |
7026868, | Nov 20 2003 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Variable supply amplifier system |
7034614, | Nov 21 2003 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Modified polar amplifier architecture |
7042284, | Sep 20 2002 | Alcatel | Operational amplifier arrangement |
7043213, | Jun 24 2003 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Multi-mode amplifier system |
7061327, | Jan 24 2002 | Maxim Integrated Products, Inc | Single supply headphone driver/charge pump combination |
7061328, | Jan 24 2002 | Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. | Integrated direct drive inductor means enabled headphone amplifier |
7106135, | Aug 26 2004 | CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY LTD | Amplifier system and method |
7183857, | Jan 24 2002 | Maxim Integrated Products, Inc | Single supply direct drive amplifier |
20100019843, | |||
WO983, | |||
WO9723005, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 02 2008 | Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Dec 04 2008 | DELANO, CARY L | LEADIS TECHNOLOGY, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022149 | /0753 | |
Dec 04 2008 | NORTH, BRIAN B | LEADIS TECHNOLOGY, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022149 | /0753 | |
Dec 04 2008 | JAYARAMAN, ARUN | LEADIS TECHNOLOGY, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022149 | /0753 | |
Mar 03 2009 | LEADIS TECHNOLOGY, INC | Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022427 | /0461 | |
Sep 16 2016 | Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation | DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT | 040075 | /0644 | |
Oct 27 2021 | DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH | Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 057969 | /0206 | |
Oct 28 2021 | Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC | DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 058871 | /0799 | |
Jun 22 2023 | DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC | RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS RECORDED AT REEL 040075, FRAME 0644 | 064070 | /0536 | |
Jun 22 2023 | DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation | RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS RECORDED AT REEL 040075, FRAME 0644 | 064070 | /0536 | |
Jun 22 2023 | DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC | RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS RECORDED AT REEL 058871, FRAME 0799 | 065653 | /0001 | |
Jun 22 2023 | DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation | RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS RECORDED AT REEL 058871, FRAME 0799 | 065653 | /0001 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 17 2010 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Dec 23 2013 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Dec 26 2017 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Dec 15 2021 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jul 06 2013 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jan 06 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 06 2014 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jul 06 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jul 06 2017 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jan 06 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 06 2018 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jul 06 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jul 06 2021 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jan 06 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 06 2022 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jul 06 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |