A system is provided comprising a fabric coupling together a plurality of computing devices, wherein the fabric transfers a stream of packets between the computing devices. Each computing device comprises a quality of service (“QOS”) filter that monitors incoming packets to filter out packets of a maintenance type and permit transfer of packets of a transaction type.
|
9. A filtering apparatus, comprising:
means for monitoring a stream of packets between a plurality of computing devices by a fabric;
means for filtering out packets of a maintenance type; and
means for permitting transfer of packets of a transaction type.
16. A method, comprising:
transferring a stream of packets between a plurality of computing devices by a fabric;
monitoring the stream of incoming packets;
filtering out packets of a maintenance type; and
permitting transfer of packets of a transaction type.
1. A system, comprising:
a fabric coupling together a plurality of computing devices, wherein the fabric transfers a stream of packets between the computing devices;
each computing device comprising:
a quality of service (“QOS”) filter that monitors incoming packets to filter out packets of a maintenance type and permit transfer of packets of a transaction type.
2. The system according to
3. The system according to
4. The system according to
5. The system according to
6. The system according to
7. The system according to
8. The system according to
10. The filtering apparatus according to
11. The filtering apparatus according to
12. The filtering apparatus according to
13. The filtering apparatus according to
14. The filtering apparatus according to
means for assigning a predetermined amount of flow control credit; and
means for reallocating at least some of the predetermined amount of flow control credit to another computing device when predetermined amount of flow control credit is not consumed and returned.
15. The filtering apparatus according to
17. The method according to
18. The method according to
19. The method according to
20. The method according to
21. The method according to
22. The method according to
23. The method according to
assigning a predetermined amount of flow control credit; and
when predetermined amount of flow control credit is not consumed and returned, reallocating at least some of the predetermined amount of flow control credit to another computing device.
|
Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) is a parallel bus architecture that has become the predominant local bus for various computing platforms. The implementation of the PCI technology has come close to its practical limits of performance and is not easily scaled up in frequency or down in voltage. PCI Express is another architecture utilizing point-to-point transmission, having a higher speed, and which is scalable for future improvements.
A PCI Express link is built around dedicated unidirectional couples of serial (1-bit), point-to-point connections known as “lanes.” PCI Express is a layered protocol, consisting of a Transaction Layer, a Data Link Layer, and a Physical Layer. In addition to data packets transferred from one device to another via the PCI Express, various other packets are also transferred, such as configuration packets and flow control packets. Thus, some bandwidth allocated for data packet transfer is expended in transferring management configuration cycles and flow control update packets, which in some instances results in traffic blockages in critical data paths.
Additionally, bandwidth allocated for data transfer for a particular device coupled to the PCI Express link may go unused, further contributing to system inefficiency.
For a detailed description of exemplary embodiments of the invention, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings in which:
Certain terms are used throughout the following description and claims to refer to particular system components. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, computer companies may refer to a component by different names. This document does not intend to distinguish between components that differ in name but not function. In the following discussion and in the claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to . . . .” Also, the term “couple” or “couples” is intended to mean either an indirect, direct, optical or wireless electrical connection. Thus, if a first device couples to a second device, that connection may be through a direct electrical connection, through an indirect electrical connection via other devices and connections, through an optical electrical connection, or through a wireless electrical connection.
The following discussion is directed to various embodiments of the invention. Although one or more of these embodiments may be preferred, the embodiments disclosed should not be interpreted, or otherwise used, as limiting the scope of the disclosure, including the claims. In addition, one skilled in the art will understand that the following description has broad application, and the discussion of any embodiment is meant only to be exemplary of that embodiment, and not intended to intimate that the scope of the disclosure, including the claims, is limited to that embodiment.
A fabric, such as PCI Express fabric, delivers packets from multiple devices (i.e., blades), and also utilizes bandwidth to transfer management configuration cycles and flow control update packets. The present disclosure enables filtering out such maintenance packets to avoid blocking critical data paths. Such filtering may be accomplished without software changes at the I/O device driver level, and is transparent at the operating system level. Implementing such a filter lowers system costs.
Likewise, by filtering maintenance packets to identify flow control packets, monitoring may be accomplished to determine whether all allocated flow control credits are being consumed and returned, and the rate of return. When credits from a given computing device are not being returned, or not being returned at a desirable rate (as compared with other system devices), flow control credits may be reallocated to other devices, thereby making use of bandwidth which would otherwise go unused (for example, when the device to which it is allocated is down or no longer needs as much bandwidth).
Referring now to
Specifically, the filter 106 examines inbound header information to determine whether the packet is an ETLP, a BFCP, or a native configuration request. The filter 106 forwards configuration requests to a FIFO buffer 108 and onward to the Network Configuration module 110 for appropriate processing. The filter 106 intercepts BFCP, and encodes such information into an appropriate transmission (TX) credit limit update that is provided to the regulator 116, and thereby the encapsulator (not shown) at the other end of the fabric 100. The filter 106 allows ETLPs to pass to another FIFO buffer 112 to the decapsulator 114 associated with the destination buffer. Finally, at the conclusion of packet processing, the filter 106 performs error correction by verifying the End-to-End Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC) value (if present), and flagging an error if the value is incorrect.
In various embodiments, byte 12 stores a value reflective of whether the packet is a control flow packet (i.e., an internal packet) or an ETLP. By at least one vendor definition, byte 12 can indicate either a “Buffer Flow Control” packet or a “PCI-Express” packet.
In various embodiments, bytes 17, 18 and 19 stores a value reflective of the control flow credits allocated and used up with the transfer of the present packet. By examining each of the relevant bytes in the header for message type, the filter is operable to allow through ETLPs while culling out the BCFPs and configuration requests, thereby preventing such packets from impeding traffic of the ETLPs.
Referring now to
If the packet is a native configuration request, the request is removed from the incoming stream and redirected to the network configuration block 110 by way of the FIFO buffer 108 (block 304). Otherwise, another determination is made as to whether the packet is a transaction layer packet intended for a particular buffer (block 306). In various embodiments, this determination may be made by examining byte 8 for clarification of the message type in combination with examination of bytes 10 and 11, as a vendor identifier match, in combination with a non-control type byte 12 signifies when a packet is a transaction layer packet. When the packet is a transaction layer packet, the encapsulated packet is permitted to pass through the filter 106, and is written to the FIFO 112 (block 308), and then sent on to the decapsulator 114 for the buffer for which the packet is addressed (block 310).
If, at block 306, the packet is not a ETLP, another determination is made in order to evaluate whether the packet is a BFCP (block 312). In various embodiments, this determination may be made by examining bytes 17, 18 and 19, which indicate flow control credit information. Specifically, in various embodiments, each computing device in the system may have a predetermined number of flow control credits allocated for use, indicating the percentage of available bandwidth that may be used by the device. Such allocated number of credits may, in some embodiments, be advertised.
At block 306, when the packet is a BFCP, the information from the packet may be encoded into a transmission credit limit update at block 314, and forwarded to the regulator 316. The regulator may in turn advertise the transmission credit limit update, so that credits may be reallocated, as will be discussed further below with respect to
The filter 106 may, in some embodiments, additionally include error correction as described above (block 318). In the event that the packet under examination is some unsupported type other than those described herein, an error message is generated and the packet is discarded, thereby preventing the packet from blocking critical data paths (block 320).
Referring now to
The filter 106, as described above, monitors the incoming stream of packets for flow control packets (block 404). The filter 106 is operable to determine whether flow control packets are being returned at all (block 406), and whether flow control packets are being returned at the rate for which credits are apportioned for the device (block 408). If flow control packets are not being returned or are not being returned at the rate for which credits are apportioned for the device, the regulator forwards such information so that the flow control credits may be reallocated based on which device has the greatest demand for additional credits (block 408). If the flow control packets are being returned, and at an appropriate rate, the assignment of credits is maintained (block 410).
The above discussion is meant to be illustrative of the principles and various embodiments of the present invention. Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.
Riley, Dwight D., Chin, Kenneth T., Norden, Hahn Vo, Brinkmann, Hubert E., Brownell, Paul V., Dinh, James, Matthews, David L.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6631122, | Jun 11 1999 | BlackBerry Limited | Method and system for wireless QOS agent for all-IP network |
6636485, | May 14 1998 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP | Method and system for providing quality-of-service in a data-over-cable system |
6757521, | Jun 12 2000 | I O CONTROLS CORPORATION | Method and system for locating and assisting portable devices performing remote diagnostic analysis of a control network |
6768738, | Oct 05 1998 | Alaxala Networks Corporation | Packet forwarding apparatus with a flow detection table |
6781991, | Feb 26 1999 | Lucent Technologies Inc.; Lucent Technologies Inc | Method and apparatus for monitoring and selectively discouraging non-elected transport service over a packetized network |
6816903, | May 27 1997 | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS SUCCESSOR AGENT | Directory enabled policy management tool for intelligent traffic management |
7042848, | May 04 2001 | RPX Corporation | System and method for hierarchical policing of flows and subflows of a data stream |
7042992, | Feb 07 2003 | Securus Technologies, LLC | Systems and methods for account establishment and transaction management using interrupt messaging |
7076552, | May 24 2000 | Sony Deutschland GmbH | Universal QoS adaptation framework for mobile multimedia applications |
7206860, | May 11 2004 | GOOGLE LLC | Virtualization switch and storage system |
7286535, | Apr 08 2002 | Alaxala Networks Corporation | Device for flow classifying and packet forwarding device with flow classify function |
7333798, | Aug 08 2002 | GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION | Telecommunication call management and monitoring system |
7349340, | Jun 18 2003 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP | System and method of monitoring e-service Quality of Service at a transaction level |
7359364, | Dec 10 1997 | Intel Corporation | Monitoring in communication system with wireless trunk |
7474666, | Sep 03 2003 | Cisco Systems, Inc; Cisco Technology, Inc | Switch port analyzers |
7483379, | May 17 2002 | WSOU Investments, LLC | Passive network monitoring system |
7486614, | Jul 17 2002 | FIBERHOME TELECOMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES CO , LTD | Implementation method on multi-service flow over RPR and apparatus therefor |
7505567, | Dec 30 2005 | AT&T Corp | Method for providing detection of fault location for defect calls in a VoIP network |
7535845, | Oct 28 2004 | Alcatel Lucent | Intelligent selective flow-based datapath architecture |
7539132, | Jan 21 2005 | AT&T Intellectual Property II, L.P. | Methods, systems, and devices for determining COS level |
7558283, | Mar 12 2004 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Method, apparatus and computer program product providing quality of service support in a wireless communications system |
7664097, | Jun 26 1996 | Verizon Patent and Licensing Inc | Telephone service via networking |
20030115266, | |||
20040037269, | |||
20040153551, | |||
20040190553, | |||
20040193711, | |||
20050135387, | |||
20060007913, | |||
20060029096, | |||
20060104230, | |||
20070105589, | |||
20080159287, | |||
20080165702, | |||
20080192752, | |||
20090100014, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 30 2007 | NORDEN, HAHN VO | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019547 | /0142 | |
May 30 2007 | BRINKMANN, HUBERT E | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019547 | /0142 | |
May 30 2007 | BROWNELL, PAUL V | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019547 | /0142 | |
May 30 2007 | CHIN, KENNETH T | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019547 | /0142 | |
May 30 2007 | MATTHEWS, DAVID L | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019547 | /0142 | |
May 30 2007 | RILEY, DWIGHT D | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019547 | /0142 | |
Jun 20 2007 | DINH, JAMES | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019547 | /0142 | |
Jul 11 2007 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Oct 27 2015 | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 037079 | /0001 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 25 2014 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 21 2018 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 22 2022 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jan 25 2014 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jul 25 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 25 2015 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jan 25 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jan 25 2018 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jul 25 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 25 2019 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jan 25 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jan 25 2022 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jul 25 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 25 2023 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jan 25 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |