This invention provides a process for manufacturing a catalyst with a desired attrition index, comprising the steps of selecting at least one molecular sieve having a morphology and size index (MSI) of from 1 to about 1000 to secure said desired attrition index of said catalyst.
|
1. A process for manufacturing a catalyst with a desired attrition rate index, comprising:
combining at least two molecular sieves having different morphologies selected from a group consisting of cube morphology, stacked platelet and cube morphology, platelet morphology, and thin platelet morphology and adjusting the weight ratio of said molecular sieves to secure said desired attrition index of said catalyst.
11. A process of making a metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve catalyst having a desired attrition index, comprising:
a. combining at least two metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieves having different morphologies selected from a group consisting of cube morphology, stacked platelet and cube morphology, platelet morphology, and thin platelet morphology and adjusting the weight ratio of said molecular sieves to secure said desired attrition index of said catalyst;
and
b. mixing said metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve(s), clay and binder to a mixture at a breakage energy effective to break apart agglomerates and aggregates;
and
c. drying said mixture to produce a dried metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve catalyst having an attrition index of not greater than 0.69 wt. %/hr.
22. A process of making a metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve catalyst having a desired attrition index, comprising the steps of:
a. selecting at least two molecular sieves, each having a morphology and size index (MSI) of from 1 to about 1000 to secure said desired attrition index of said catalyst, wherein each molecular sieve comprises different morphologies;
b. mixing said metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve(s), clay and binder at a breakage energy effective to break apart agglomerates and aggregates; and
c. drying said mixture to produce a dried metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve catalyst having an attrition rate index (ARI) of not greater than 0.69 wt. %/hr; and wherein said mixture is dried by spray drying, said breakage energy is at least 10−5 cal cm−2, said clay is a natural or synthetic clay, said binder is an inorganic oxide sol of alumina or silica.
2. The process of
4. The process of
5. The process of
and mixtures thereof.
8. The process of
9. The process of
10. The process of
14. The process of
and mixtures thereof.
17. The process of
19. The process of
20. The process of
21. The process of
23. The process of
and mixtures thereof.
24. The process of
25. The process of
|
This application claims priority to Provisional application filed on Feb. 28, 2006, U.S. Ser. No. 60/777,333.
This invention concerns making a molecular sieve catalyst having a desired attrition index and processes for using the catalyst. In particular, this invention concerns methods of making a metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve catalyst, particularly silicoaluminophosphate, molecular sieve catalyst (e.g., formulated molecular sieve catalyst), including methods of making the formulated catalyst and processes for using the formulated catalyst.
Molecular sieve crystals are generally microporous structures composed of either crystalline aluminosilicate, belonging to a class of materials known as zeolites, or crystalline aluminophosphates, or crystalline metalloaluminophosphates such as silicoaluminophosphates. The crystals are conventionally made by hydrothermal crystallization from a reaction mixture comprising reactive sources of silicon and/or aluminum and/or phosphorous containing compounds, usually in the presence of one or several organic amine or quaternary ammonium salts.
Molecular sieve catalysts are compositions made of molecular sieve crystal particles bound together to form a formulated catalyst material. The formulated molecular sieve catalyst typically includes other components such as binders, fillers such as clay, and, optionally, other catalytically active agents such as rare earth metal oxides, transition metal oxides, or noble metal components.
Conventional methods of making molecular sieve catalysts include mixing together molecular sieve and binder, as well as other optional components such as fillers and other catalytic components. The mixture is typically stirred in solution to form a slurry, and the slurry is dried to form molecular sieve catalyst particles. Following drying, the particles are calcined to remove templates present in the molecular sieve, to harden, as well as to activate the catalyst.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,764,269 (Edwards) discloses conventional methods of making and using SAPO-37 molecular sieve catalyst that can be used in catalytic cracking operations. The catalyst was found to be adversely affected by moisture, but the crystalline structure and activity of the molecular sieve component was preserved by including a stabilizing amount of the organic template compound used in the manufacture of the molecular sieve within the pore structure thereof until such time as the catalyst was thermally activated during use.
Metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieves, such as the SAPO-37 molecular sieve described by Edwards, have a variety of uses. A desirable characteristic for many of the metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieves, regardless of the process of use, is that the finished or formulated catalyst be attrition resistant, which can refer to hardness as well as ability to absorb shock, since the catalyst will typically have to endure severe stress in commercial scale processes.
For example, WO 99/21651 describes a method for making molecular sieve catalyst that is considered relatively hard. The method includes the steps of mixing together a molecular sieve and an alumina sol, the alumina sol being made in solution and maintained at a pH of 2 to 10. The mixture is then spray dried and calcined. The calcined product is reported to be relatively hard, i.e., attrition resistant.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,334,994, incorporated herein by reference, discloses a silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve, referred to as RUW-19, which is said to be an AEI/CHA mixed phase composition. In particular, RUW-19 is reported as having peaks characteristic of both CHA and AEI framework type molecular sieves, except that the broad feature centered at about 16.9 (2θ) in RUW-19 replaces the pair of reflections centered at about 17.0 (2θ) in AEI materials and RUW-19 does not have the reflections associated with CHA materials centered at 2θ values of 17.8 and 24.8. DIFFaX analysis of the X-ray diffraction pattern of RUW-19 as produced in Examples 1, 2 and 3 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,334,994 indicates that these materials are characterized by single intergrown phases of AEI and CHA framework type molecular sieves with AEI/CHA ratios of about 60/40, 65/35 and 70/30, respectively. Throughout this description, the XRD reflection values are, referred to as (2θ), which is synonymous to the expression “degrees 2θ.”
U.S. Pat. No. 6,812,372, incorporated herein by reference, discloses a silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve, comprising at least one intergrown phase of molecular sieves having AEI and CHA framework types, wherein the intergrown phase has an AEI/CHA ratio of from about 5/95 to 40/60 as determined by DIFFaX analysis, using the powder X-ray diffraction pattern of a calcined sample of the silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,953,767 and US Patent Publication No. 2005-0096214 A1 disclose a silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve comprising at least one intergrown phase of molecular sieves having AEI and CHA framework types, wherein the intergrown phase has an AEI/CHA mass ratio of from about 5/95 to 40/60 as determined by DIFFaX analysis, using the powder X-ray diffraction pattern of a calcined sample of the silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve. It also relates to methods for its preparation and to its use in the catalytic conversion of methanol to olefins.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,153,552 describes another method for making molecular sieve catalyst. The catalyst is made by mixing together a silicon containing oxide sol as a binder material and a molecular sieve material. The pH of the mixture is adjusted prior to spray drying. Following spray drying, the catalyst material is calcined to form a finished catalyst product, which is reported to be relatively hard, i.e., attrition resistant.
A suitable attrition index continues to be a desirable characteristic in molecular sieve catalysts. As new process systems are developed, the ability to control a desired attrition index of a catalyst is particularly important so as to improve the catalytic process and process economics. A lower attrition index translates into lower catalyst loss rate, therefore, lower catalyst make-up rate and better process economics. Therefore, obtaining molecular sieve catalysts that have a desired degree of attrition index are still sought.
In one embodiment, this invention provides a process for manufacturing a catalyst with a desired attrition index, comprising the steps of:
a. selecting a molecular sieve having a morphology selected from a group consisting of cube morphology, stacked platelet and cube morphology, platelet morphology, and thin platelet morphology to secure the desired attrition index of the catalyst; or
b. combining at least two molecular sieves having different morphologies selected from a group consisting of cube morphology, stacked platelet and cube morphology, platelet morphology, and thin platelet morphology and adjusting the weight ratio of the molecular sieves to secure the desired attrition index of the catalyst.
In another embodiment, this invention relates to a process of making a metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve catalyst having a desired attrition index, comprising the steps of:
a. selecting a metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve having a morphology selected from a group consisting of cube morphology, stacked platelet and cube morphology, platelet morphology, and thin platelet morphology to secure the desired attrition index of the catalyst; or
b. combining at least two metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieves having different morphologies selected from a group consisting of cube morphology, stacked platelet and cube morphology, platelet morphology, and thin platelet morphology and adjusting the weight ratio of the molecular sieves to secure the desired attrition index of the catalyst; and
c. mixing the metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve(s), clay and binder at a breakage energy effective to break apart agglomerates and aggregates; and
d. drying the mixture to produce a dried metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve catalyst having an attrition index of not greater than 0.5 wt. %/hr.
In another embodiment, this application relates to a process for manufacturing a catalyst with a desired attrition index, comprising the steps of selecting at least one molecular sieve having a morphology and size index (MSI) of from 1 to about 1000 to secure said desired attrition index of said catalyst.
In yet another embodiment, this application relates to a process of making a metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve catalyst having a desired attrition index, comprising the steps of:
a. selecting at least one molecular sieve having a morphology and size index (MSI) of from 1 to about 1000 to secure said desired attrition index of said catalyst;
b. mixing said metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve(s), clay and binder at a breakage energy effective to break apart agglomerates and aggregates; and
c. drying said mixture to produce a dried metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve catalyst having an attrition rate index (ARI) of not greater than 0.5 wt. %/hr.
In yet another embodiment, this application relates to a process for manufacturing olefin product from oxygenate, comprising the steps of:
a. introducing a molecular sieve catalyst of any preceding paragraphs into a reaction system;
b. contacting the catalyst composition with oxygenate in the reaction system to form olefin product; and
c. withdrawing the olefin product.
This invention provides an attrition resistant metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve catalyst, methods of making the catalyst composition and processes for using the catalyst composition. The metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve catalyst is highly attrition resistant in dried as well as calcined forms.
According to this invention, attrition resistant refers to the ability to resist breaking apart as a result of physical impact. Since molecular sieve catalysts are often used in fluidized bed reaction systems or riser type reaction systems, the ability of such catalysts to avoid physical damage within the reaction systems is important. The catalyst of this invention is particularly attrition resistant. Attrition resistance, however, does not necessarily mean that the catalyst is hard, although hardness is a desirable characteristic. Attrition resistance can also be obtained through such characteristics as a catalyst's ability to absorb shock from impact as the catalyst is circulated through the reaction system. In some sense, the ability of the catalyst to absorb shock is similar to the ability of a ball to bounce off a hard surface without deforming the ball.
The catalyst of this invention exhibits high attrition resistance as a result of having a core composition that is substantially the same structure as its external surface. This means that the catalyst is substantially uniform in composition from the core region to the external surface of the catalyst. If the surface of the catalyst is substantially different from that of the core region, then there will be a tendency for the catalyst to break down or break apart as a result of physical stress. Thus, a relatively non-uniform catalyst structure results in a catalyst composition having reduced attrition resistance.
A preferred way of measuring surface composition is to measure the clay to alumina ratio at the surface of the catalyst. This can be accomplished using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). All clay to alumina ratio as used in the invention was measured by the EDS method, wherein the alumina is calculated based on the aluminum from both binder and molecular sieves (e.g., SAPOs).
In this invention, EDS was performed using a Hitachi S-4300 scanning 9 electron microscope equipped with a 30 mm2 PGT Prism energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer. The following microscope and collection parameters were used: accelerating, voltage=6 kV; objective aperture=1 (100 μm); C2 spot size=5; working distance=15 mm; sample-detector distance≈25 mm; collection time=100 s; detector resolution=10 eV/channel; and a detector dead time #10-20%. Under these collection conditions, the sampling depth for P Kα, Si Kα, Al Kα and O Kα X-rays is between≈2.2-2.5 μm (i.e., the maximum escape depth for X-rays) for a formulated catalyst sample having a bulk density of approximately 0.5 g/cm3. This escape depth can be calculated using the Anderson-Hasler X-ray range equation [1], which requires the average density (0.5 g/cm3 formulated catalyst) of the sample and the incident accelerating voltage (6 kV).
In equation [1], E0 is the incident accelerating voltage, Ec is the characteristic X-ray energy and ρ is the sample density.
Particles >50 μm in diameter were randomly selected to determine surface clay to alumina ratio. A 6×6 μm box was positioned on the crown of the particle and the beam rastered for 100 s across the 36 μm2 region to collect the EDS spectrum. Typically, a total of 20 particles was analyzed for each sample.
In order to quantify the composition of EDS spectra from the 20 particles from each sample, standard spectra were collected from each of the individual components (molecular sieve, binder and clay). Using microscope settings and collection conditions indicated above, 20 individual spectra were collected from each reference material. A single reference spectrum was generated from the 20 individual spectra by summing the 20 spectra and then dividing by 20 to from an average spectrum for the reference material.
A software package (IDL) was used to fit the entire spectra (0-6 keV) of each of the primary catalyst components (molecular sieve, binder and clay) against the 20 individual spectra that were collected from the 20 individual formulated catalyst particles. This allowed the relative concentrations of each of the three primary components in each particle to be determined. The fitting routine output as fractional components the relative contributions of the three reference spectra to the spectra collected from the particles.
In order to determine the degree of uniformity between the surface composition and the core composition of the catalyst, the clay to alumina ratio at the surface of the catalyst and at the core is compared. The clay to alumina ratio at the core region of the catalyst is determined by crushing a sample of the catalyst to form a bulk composition and using EDS to determine the clay to alumina ratio of the bulk composition in the same manner as for the surface samples.
Fractional amounts of crushed catalyst can be compared with known fractional components to develop a correction factor. For example, the deviation between measured and known catalyst components allowed for an X-ray absorption correction factor to be developed which was then applied to all of the spectra collected from the surface of the 20 particles analyzed per sample. This absorption corrected value of the original fractional components was then calculated and averaged for the 20 particles. The ratio of the average value measured from 20 particles provided the final clay/alumina ratio.
The catalyst of this invention is characterized by being highly uniform in composition, as well as attrition resistant. These characteristics are exhibited in all dried forms of the fully formulated catalyst compositions, including spray dried forms and calcined forms. The advantage is that the catalyst does not have to be completely calcined to be considered attrition resistant, which is particularly advantageous with regards to shipping or storage. For example, the catalyst can be dried but not so extensively to remove template material from the catalyst. Leaving in the template material will provide increased protection to avoid damage of the catalyst activity as a result of contact with moisture. Even low levels of moisture (i.e., water) contacting internal catalyst sites can cause significant decreases in catalytic activity.
A. Overall Composition
The catalyst of this invention is a metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve catalyst, which comprises metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve, clay and binder. Such a combination is generally referred to as a formulated catalyst. In one aspect, the formulated catalyst composition is characterized by being highly resistant to attrition.
B. Molecular Sieve Crystal Component
The metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve component can be represented by the empirical formula, on an anhydrous basis:
mR:(MxAlyPz)O2
wherein R represents at least one templating agent, preferably an organic templating agent; m is the number of moles of R per mole of (MxAlyPz)O2 and m has a value from 0 to 1, preferably 0 to 0.5, and most preferably from 0 to 0.3; x, y, and z represent the mole fraction of Al, P and M as tetrahedral oxides, where M is a metal selected from one of Group IA, IIA, IB, IIIB, IVB, VB, VIIB, VIIB, VIIIB and Lanthanide's of the Periodic Table of Elements, preferably M is selected from one of the group consisting of Si, Ge, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ga, Ge, Mg, Mn, Ni, Sn, Ti, Zn, Zr and mixtures thereof. In an embodiment, m is greater than or equal to 0.2, and x, y and z are greater than or equal to 0.01. In another embodiment, m is greater than 0.1 to about 1, x is greater than 0 to about 0.25, y is in the range of from 0.4 to 0.5, and z is in the range of from 0.25 to 0.5, more preferably m is from 0.15 to 0.7, x is from 0.01 to 0.2, y is from 0.4 to 0.5, and z is from 0.3 to 0.5.
Examples of metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieves which can be used in this invention are described in detail in numerous publications including for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,567,029 (MeAPO where Me is Mg, Mn, Zn, or Co), U.S. Pat. No. 4,440,871 (SAPO), European Patent Application EP-A-0 159 624 (ELAPSO where El is As, Be, B, Cr, Co, Ga, Ge, Fe, Li, Mg, Mn, Ti or Zn), U.S. Pat. No. 4,554,143 (FeAPO), U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,822,478, 4,683,217, 4,744,885 (FeAPSO), EP-A-0 158 975 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,935,216 (ZNAPSO, EP-A-0 161 489 (CoAPSO), EP-A-0 158 976 (ELAPO, where EL is Co, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ti or Zn), U.S. Pat. No. 4,310,440 (AlPO.sub.4), EP-A-0 158 350 (SENAPSO), U.S. Pat. No. 4,973,460 (LiAPSO), U.S. Pat. No. 4,789,535 (LiAPO), U.S. Pat. No. 4,992,250 (GeAPSO), U.S. Pat. No. 4,888,167 (GeAPO), U.S. Pat. No. 5,057,295 (BAPSO), U.S. Pat. No. 4,738,837 (CrAPSO), U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,759,919, and 4,851,106 (CrAPO), U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,758,419, 4,882,038, 5,434,326 and 5,478,787 (MgAPSO), U.S. Pat. No. 4,554,143 (FeAPO), U.S. Pat. No. 4,894,213 (AsAPSO), U.S. Pat. No. 4,913,888 (AsAPO), U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,686,092, 4,846,956 and 4,793,833 (MnAPSO), U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,345,011 and 6,156,931 (MnAPO), U.S. Pat. No. 4,737,353 (BeAPSO), U.S. Pat. No. 4,940,570 (BeAPO), U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,801,309, 4,684,617 and 4,880,520 (TiAPSO), U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,500,651, 4,551,236 and 4,605,492 (TiAPO), U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,824,554, 4,744,970 (CoAPSO), U.S. Pat. No. 4,735,806 (GaAPSO) EP-A-0 293 937 (QAPSO, where Q is framework oxide unit [QO2]), as well as U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,567,029; 4,686,093; 4,781,814; 4,793,984; 4,801,364; 4,853,197; 4,917,876; 4,952,384; 4,956,164; 4,956,165; 4,973,785; 5,241,093; 5,493,066; and 5,675,050; all of which are herein fully incorporated by reference.
Other metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieves include those described in EP-0 888 187 BI [microporous crystalline metallophosphates, SAPO4 (UIO-6)], U.S. Pat. No. 6,004,898 (molecular sieve and an alkaline earth metal), PCT WO 01/62382 published Aug. 30, 2001 (integrated hydrocarbon co-catalyst), PCT WO 01/64340 published Sep. 7, 2001 (thorium containing molecular sieve), and R. Szostak, Handbook of Molecular Sieves, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, N.Y. (1992), which are all herein fully incorporated by reference.
Most preferably, the metalloaluminophosphate molecular sieve present in the molecular sieve catalyst are selected from the group consisting of silicoaluminophosphate (SAPO) molecular sieves, aluminophosphate molecular sieves and metal substituted forms thereof. Non-limiting examples of SAPO and AlPO molecular sieves that may be present in the molecular sieve catalyst of the 9 invention include molecular sieves selected from the group consisting of SAPO-5, SAPO-8, SAPO-11, SAPO-16, SAPO-17, SAPO-18, SAPO-20, SAPO-31, SAPO-34, SAPO-35, SAPO-36, SAPO-37, SAPO-40, SAPO-41, SAPO-42, SAPO-44, SAPO-47, SAPO-56, AlPO-5, AlPO-11, AlPO-18, AlPO-31, AlPO-34, AlPO-36, AlPO-37, AlPO-46, metal containing molecular sieves thereof, and mixtures thereof. The more preferred molecular sieves include molecular sieves selected from the group consisting of SAPO-18, SAPO-34, SAPO-35, SAPO-44, SAPO-56, AlPO-18 AlPO-34, metal containing molecular sieves thereof, and mixtures thereof; even more preferably molecular sieves selected from the group consisting of SAPO-18, SAPO-34, AlPO-34, AlPO-18, metal containing molecular sieves thereof, and mixtures thereof; and most preferably molecular sieves selected from the group consisting of SAPO-34, AlPO-18, metal containing molecular sieves thereof, and mixtures thereof.
As used herein, the term mixture is synonymous with combination and is considered a composition of matter having two or more components in varying proportions, regardless of their physical state. With regard to the molecular sieve crystal components of the catalyst, the term further encompasses physical mixtures of crystalline and amorphous components, as well as intergrowths of at least two different molecular sieve structures, such as for example those described in PCT Publication No. WO 98/15496.
In one embodiment, the molecular sieve crystal is an intergrowth material having two or more distinct phases of crystalline structures within one molecular sieve composition. In another embodiment, the molecular sieve crystal comprises at least one intergrown phase of AEI and CHA framework-types. For example, SAPO-18, AlPO-18 and RUW-18 have an AEI framework-type, and SAPO-34 has a CHA framework-type. In a further embodiment, the molecular sieve crystal comprises a mixture of intergrown material and non-intergrown material.
Intergrown molecular sieve phases are disordered planar intergrowths of molecular sieve frameworks. Inventor refers to the “Catalog of Disordered Zeolite Structures”, 2000 Edition, published by the Structure Commission of the International Zeolite Association and to the “Collection of Simulated XRD Powder Patterns for Zeolites”, M. M. J. Treacy and J. B. Higgins, 2001 Edition, published on behalf of the Structure Commission of the International Zeolite Association for a detailed explanation on intergrown molecular sieve phases.
Regular crystalline solids are periodically ordered in three dimensions. Structurally disordered structures show periodic ordering in dimensions less than three, i.e., in two, one or zero dimensions. This phenomenon is called stacking disorder of structurally invariant Periodic Building Units. Crystal structures built from Periodic Building Units are called end-member structures if periodic ordering is achieved in all three dimensions. Disordered structures are those where the stacking sequence of the Periodic Building Units deviates from periodic ordering up to statistic stacking sequences.
The intergrowth molecular sieves of the present invention are disordered planar intergrowths of end-member structures AEI and CHA. We refer to A. Simmen et al. in Zeolites (1991), Vol. 11, pp. 654-661 describing the structure of molecular sieves with AEI and CHA framework types. For AEI and CHA, the Periodic Building Unit is a double six-ring layer. There are two types of layers “a” and “b”, which are identical except “b” is the mirror image of “a” (180° rotation about the plane normal or mirror operation perpendicular to the plane normal). When layers of the same type stack on top of one another, i.e., aaa or bbb, the framework type CHA is generated. When layers “a” and “b” alternate, i.e., abab, the framework type AEI is generated. The molecular sieves of the present invention are made of stacking of layers “a” and “b” which contain regions of CHA framework type and regions of AEI framework type. Each change of CHA to AEI framework type is a stacking disorder or planar fault.
Preferably, the intergrowth molecular sieves of the invention possess an AEI/CHA mass ratio of from about 7/93 to 38/62, more preferably from about 8/92 to 35/65, even more preferably from about 9/91 to 33/67, most preferably from about 10/90 to 30/70 as determined by DIFFaX analysis, using the powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of a calcined sample of the silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve.
The X-ray diffraction data referred to herein are collected with a SCINTAG X2 X-Ray Powder Diffractometer (Scintag Inc., USA), using copper K-alpha radiation. The diffraction data are recorded by step-scanning at 0.02 degrees of two-theta, where theta is the Bragg angle, and a counting time of 1 second for each step. Prior to recording of each experimental X-ray diffraction pattern, the sample must be in the anhydrous state and free of any template used in its synthesis, since the simulated patterns are calculated using only framework atoms, not water or template. Given the sensitivity of silicoaluminophosphate materials to water at recording temperatures, the molecular sieve samples are calcined after preparation and kept moisture-free according to the following procedure.
About 2 grams of each molecular sieve sample are heated in an oven from room temperature under a flow of nitrogen at a rate of 3° C./minute to 200° C. and, while retaining the nitrogen flow, the sample is held at 200° C. for 30 minutes and the temperature of the oven is then raised at a rate of 2° C./minute to 650° C. The sample is then retained at 650° C. for 8 hours, the first 5 hours being under nitrogen and the final 3 hours being under air. The oven is then cooled to 200° C. at 30° C./minute and, when the XRD pattern is to be recorded, the sample is transferred from the oven directly to a sample holder and covered with Mylar foil to prevent rehydration. It is also possible after cool-down to room temperature, to do a fast recording of the XRD pattern immediately after removal of the Mylar foil (e.g. by using a total scan time of less than 5 minutes).
In the case of crystals with planar faults, interpretation of XRD diffraction patterns requires an ability to simulate the effects of stacking disorder. DIFFaX is a computer program based on a mathematical model for calculating intensities from crystals containing planar faults (see M. M. J. Tracey et al., Proceedings of the Royal Chemical Society, London, A (1991), Vol. 433, pp. 499-520). DIFFaX is the simulation program selected by and available from the International Zeolite Association to simulate the XRD powder patterns for intergrown phases of zeolites (see “Collection of Simulated XRD Powder Patterns for Zeolites” by M. M. J. Treacy and J. B. Higgins, 2001, Fourth Edition, published on behalf of the Structure Commission of the International Zeolite Association). It has also been used to theoretically study intergrown phases of AEI, CHA, and KFI, as reported by K. P. Lillerud et al. in “Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis”, 1994, vol. 84, pp. 543-550. DIFFaX is a well-known and established method to characterize crystalline materials with planar faults such as the intergrown molecular sieves of the present invention.
As the ratio of AEI increases relative to CHA in the intergrown phase, one can observe a decrease in intensity of certain peaks, for example, the peak at about 2θ=25.0 and an increase in intensity of other peaks, for example the peak at about 2θ=17.05 and the shoulder at 2θ=21.2. Intergrown phases with AEI/CHA ratios of 50/50 and above (AEI/CHA≧1.0) show a broad feature centered at about 16.9 (2θ). Intergrown phases with AEI/CHA ratios of 40/60 and lower (AEI/CHA≦0.67) show a broad feature centered at about 18 (2θ).
The intergrowth molecular sieves of the present invention are characterized by powder XRD diffraction patterns obtained from samples after calcination and avoiding re-hydration after calcination, having at least the reflections in the 5 to 25 (2θ) range as shown in Table 1:
TABLE 1
2θ (CuKα)
9.3-9.6
12.7-13.0
13.8-14.0
15.9-16.1
17.7-18.1
18.9-19.1
20.5-20.7
23.7-24.0
The XRD diffraction patterns of the intergrown phases of AEI/CHA according to the present invention are also characterized by the absence of peaks in the 9.8 to 12.0 (2θ) range and the absence of any broad feature centered at about 16.9 (2θ). A further characteristic is the presence of a peak in the 17.7 to 18.1 (2θ) range. The reflection peak in the 17.7-18.1 (2θ) range has a relative intensity between 0.09 and 0.4, preferably between 0.1 and 0.35 with respect to the reflection peak at 17.9 (2θ) in the diffraction pattern of SAPO-34, all diffraction patterns being normalized to the intensity value of the reflection peak in the 20.5-20.7 (2θ) range.
The intergrowth molecular sieves of the present invention may comprise an intergrown phase of AEI and CHA molecular sieves. Preferably the CHA molecular sieve is SAPO-34 and the AEI molecular sieve is selected from SAPO-18, ALPO-18 or a mixture of SAPO-18 and ALPO-18. Preferably, the intergrowth molecular sieves of the present invention have a silica to alumina molar ratios (SiO2/Al2O3) ranging from 0.01 to 0.28, more preferably from 0.02 to 0.20, even more preferably from 0.03 to 0.19. The silica to alumina molar ratio (SiO2/Al2O3) is preferably determined by chemical analysis.
C. Clay Component
The clay component of the catalyst of this invention can be a natural or synthetic clay. Naturally occurring clays or modified natural occurring clays, e.g., partially dried or dehydrated, milled or micronized, or chemically treated are preferred. Such naturally occurring clays include clays from the kaolinite group, the mica group, the smectite group, and the chlorite group. Examples of kaolinite group clays include kaolinite, dickite and halloysite. Examples of the mica group clays include muscovite, illite, glauconite and biotite. Examples of the smectite group include montmorillonite and vermiculite. Examples of the chlorite group include penninite, clinochlore, ripidolite and chamosite.
Mixed layer clays can also be used. These clays are made of a regular or random stacking of layers composed of members of one or more groups of clay minerals. Chlorite may be seen as a regular alternation of mica and brucite layers. Random mixed layering of three layer clays is common, with examples being mixed layer mica/smectite and chlorite/vermiculite. In regular mixed layer structures such as chlorite, the basal spacing is a combination of that of the individual layers. In random mixed layering there is a non-integral series of reflections from the basal planes. This is shown as a composite reflection intermediate in position between those of the individual layers, or as a spreading of the reflection. Thus, when a significant amount of smectite is interlayered with mica in a random manner, the mica peak will not be sharp, but will be spread towards the lower angle smectite reflection. The amount of spreading depends on the amount of mixed layering that exists.
D. Binder Component
Binders that are used in this invention are materials that act like glue, binding together the molecular sieve crystals and other materials, to form a formulated molecular sieve catalyst. Non-limiting examples of binders that can be used in this invention include various types of inorganic oxide sols such as an inorganic oxide sol of alumina or silica, and in particular, aluminum chlorohydrate, hydrated aluminas, silicas, and/or other inorganic oxide sols.
E. Catalyst Composition Characteristics
One characteristic of the formulated catalyst composition of this invention is that it is substantially uniform in composition. The degree of uniformity from a core region of the catalyst to an external surface is preferably assessed by comparing the clay to alumina ratio of the catalyst at the core region and at the surface. A high degree of uniformity means that there are insubstantial differences between the clay to alumina ratio at the core and at the surface.
In one embodiment, the clay to alumina ratio at the surface is within ±20% of the clay to alumina ratio at the core.
In one embodiment, the catalyst composition has a core clay to alumina ratio of from 2.2:1 to 2.6:1. Preferably, the catalyst composition has a core clay to alumina ratio of from 2.3:1 to 2.5:1.
In another embodiment, the catalyst composition has a surface clay to alumina ratio of from 1.7:1 to 3.1:1. Preferably, wherein the catalyst composition has a surface clay to alumina ratio of from 1.8:1 to 3:1, more preferably from 1.9:1 to 2.9:1, and most preferably from 2:1 to 2.8:1.
Another characteristic of the catalyst of this invention is that it is highly attrition resistant, as measured by the Attrition index (ARI) method. The ARI is used over other measurement methods, since many other methods are not sufficient to measure very highly attrition resistant molecular sieve catalysts such as those made according to this invention.
The ARI methodology is similar to the conventional Davison Index method. The smaller the ARI is, the more resistant to attrition the catalyst is. The ARI is measured by adding 6.0±0.1 g of catalyst having a particles size ranging from 53 to 125 microns to a hardened steel attrition cup. Approximately 24,000 scc/min of nitrogen gas is bubbled through a water-containing bubbler to humidify the nitrogen. The wet nitrogen passes through the attrition cup, and exits the attrition apparatus through a porous fiber thimble. The flowing nitrogen removes the finer particles, with the larger particles being retained in the cup. The porous fiber thimble separates the fine catalyst particles from the nitrogen that exits through the thimble. The fine particles remaining in the thimble represent catalyst that has broken apart through attrition.
The nitrogen flow passing through the attrition cup is maintained for 1 hour. The fines collected in the thimble are removed from the unit. A new thimble is then installed. The catalyst left in the attrition unit is attrited for an additional 3 hours, under the same gas flow and moisture levels. The fines collected in the thimble are recovered. The collection of fine catalyst particles separated by the thimble after the first hour are weighed. The amount in grams of fine particles divided by the original amount of catalyst charged to the attrition cup expressed on per hour basis is the ARI, in wt %/hr.
ARI=C/(B+C)/D×100%
wherein
B=weight of catalyst left in the cup after the attrition test
C=weight of collected fine catalyst particles after the first hour of attrition treatment
D=duration of treatment in hours after the first hour attrition treatment.
In one embodiment, the formulated catalyst composition has an attrition resistance index of not greater than 0.0.69 wt. %/hr. Preferably, wherein the catalyst composition has an attrition resistance index (ARI) of not greater than 0.67 wt. %/hr, and more preferably not greater than 0.65 wt. %/hr.
The catalyst composition of the invention also has a relatively high density relative to conventional catalysts. In particular, the catalyst composition of the invention has a relatively high apparent bulk density (ABD) relative to conventional catalysts.
According to the invention, one way of measuring ABD was using the following procedure. A KIMAX graduated cylinder from KAMLE USA, accurate to 0.05 cc and having a 25 cc capacity, was used to weigh catalyst. The empty cylinder was weighed and the weight recorded as Wa. Approximately 25 cc of spray dried and calcined catalyst was poured into the cylinder, and the cylinder was tapped against a lab bench surface at a frequency of 160-170 times per minute for 30 seconds to pack the cylinder into the cylinder. The weight of the packed cylinder was weighed and recorded as Wb. The volume of the catalyst in the cylinder was determined by reading the level of the packed catalyst in the cylinder and recorded as Vc. ABD was then calculated as ABD=(Wb−Wa)Vc.
In one embodiment, the catalyst composition has an apparent bulk density (ABD) of at least 0.72 g/cc. Preferably, the catalyst composition has an ABD at least 0.73 g/cc, more preferably at least 0.74 g/cc, and most preferably at least 0.75 g/cc. Generally, the catalyst density is not significantly greater than water. In one embodiment, the catalyst composition has an ABD not greater than 1 g/cc. Preferably, the catalyst composition has an ABD not greater than 0.99 g/cc, and more preferably not greater than 0.98 g/cc.
The catalyst composition of this invention is a dried catalyst composition. It can be dried so that it retains a template within the pore structure of the molecular sieve component, such as by spray drying, or it can be further dried, such as by calcining, which removes the template from the pore structure. Because the dried catalyst is attrition resistant, it is not necessary to calcine the formulated composition prior to use. For example, the dried composition can be loaded into a reaction system so that conditions within the system remove the template to activate the catalyst for use during operation of the reaction process.
A. Making a Molecular Sieve Crystals
Generally, molecular sieves (i.e., molecular sieve crystals) are synthesized by the hydrothermal crystallization of one or more of a source of aluminum, a source of phosphorus, a source of silicon, water and a templating agent, such as a nitrogen containing organic compound. Typically, a combination of sources of silicon and aluminum, or silicon, aluminum and phosphorus, water and one or more templating agents, is placed in a sealed pressure vessel. The vessel is optionally lined with an inert plastic such as polytetrafluoroethylene, and heated under a crystallization pressure and temperature, until a crystalline material is formed, which can then recovered by filtration, centrifugation and/or decanting.
Non-limiting examples of silicon sources include silicates, fumed silica, for example, Aerosil-200 available from Degussa Inc., New York, N.Y., and CAB-O-SIL M-5, organosilicon compounds such as tetraalkylorthosilicates, for example; tetramethylorthosilicate (TMOS) and tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS), colloidal silicas or aqueous suspensions thereof, for example, Ludox-HS-40 sol available from E.I. du Pont de Nemours, Wilmington, Del., silicic acid or any combination thereof.
Non-limiting examples of aluminum sources include aluminum alkoxides, for example, aluminum isopropoxide, aluminum phosphate, aluminum hydroxide, sodium aluminate, pseudo-boehmite, gibbsite and aluminum trichloride, or any combination thereof. A convenient source of aluminum is pseudo-boehmite, particularly when producing a silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve.
Non-limiting examples of phosphorus sources, which may also include aluminum-containing phosphorus compositions, include phosphoric acid, organic phosphates such as triethyl phosphate, and crystalline or amorphous aluminophosphates such as AlPO4, phosphorus salts, or combinations thereof. A convenient source of phosphorus is phosphoric acid, particularly when producing a silicoaluminophosphate.
In general, templating agents or templates include compounds that contain elements of Group 15 of the Periodic Table of Elements, particularly nitrogen, phosphorus, arsenic and antimony. Typical templates also contain at least one alkyl or aryl group, such as an alkyl or aryl group having from 1 to 10 carbon atoms, for example from 1 to 8 carbon atoms. Preferred templates are nitrogen-containing compounds, such as amines, quaternary ammonium compounds and combinations thereof. Suitable quaternary ammonium compounds are represented by the general formula R4N+, where each R is hydrogen or a hydrocarbyl or substituted hydrocarbyl group, preferably an alkyl group or an aryl group having from 1 to 10 carbon atoms.
Non-limiting examples of templates include tetraalkyl ammonium compounds including salts thereof, such as tetramethyl ammonium compounds, tetraethyl ammonium compounds, tetrapropyl ammonium compounds, and tetrabutylammonium compounds, cyclohexylamine, morpholine, di-n-propylamine (DPA), tripropylamine, triethylamine (TEA), triethanolamine, piperidine, cyclohexylamine, 2-methylpyridine, N,N-dimethylbenzylamine, N,N-diethylethanolamine, dicyclohexylamine, N,N-dimethylethanolamine, choline, N,N′-dimethylpiperazine, 1,4-diazabicyclo(2,2,2)octane, N′,N′,N,N-tetramethyl-(1,6)hexanediamine, N-methyldiethanolamine, N-methyl-ethanolamine, N-methyl piperidine, 3-methyl-piperidine, N-methylcyclohexylamine, 3-methylpyridine, 4-methyl-pyridine, quinuclidine, N,N′-dimethyl-1,4-diazabicyclo(2,2,2) octane ion; di-n-butylamine, neopentylamine, di-n-pentylamine, isopropylamine, t-butyl-amine, ethylenediamine, pyrrolidine, and 2-imidazolidone. Preferred templates are selected from the group consisting of tetraethyl ammonium salts, cyclopentylamine, aminomethyl cyclohexane, piperidine, triethylamine, cyclohexylamine, tri-ethyl hydroxyethylamine, morpholine, dipropylamine (DPA), pyridine, isopropylamine, heated degraded forms thereof, and combinations thereof.
Generally, the synthesis mixture described above is sealed in a vessel and heated, preferably under autogenous pressure, to a temperature in the range of from about room temperature to about 250° C., such as from about 100° C. to about 250° C., for example, from about 125° C. to about 225° C., such as from about 150° C. to about 180° C.
In one embodiment, the synthesis of molecular sieve crystalline particles is aided by seeds from another or the same framework type molecular sieve.
The time required to form the crystalline particles is usually dependent on the temperature and can vary from immediately up to several weeks. Typically, the crystallization time is from about 30 minutes to around 2 weeks, such as from about 45 minutes to about 240 hours, for example from about 1 hour to about 120 hours. The hydrothermal crystallization may be carried out with or without agitation or stirring.
One method for crystallization involves subjecting an aqueous reaction mixture containing an excess amount of a templating agent to crystallization under hydrothermal conditions, establishing an equilibrium between molecular sieve formation and dissolution, and then, removing some of the excess templating agent and/or organic base to inhibit dissolution of the molecular sieve. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,296,208, which is herein fully incorporated by reference.
Other methods for synthesizing molecular sieves or modifying molecular sieves are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,879,655 (controlling the ratio of the templating agent to phosphorus), U.S. Pat. No. 6,005,155 (use of a modifier without a salt), U.S. Pat. No. 5,475,182 (acid extraction), U.S. Pat. No. 5,962,762 (treatment with transition metal), U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,925,586 and 6,153,552 (phosphorus modified), U.S. Pat. No. 5,925,800 (monolith supported), U.S. Pat. No. 5,932,512 (fluorine treated), U.S. Pat. No. 6,046,373 (electromagnetic wave treated or modified), U.S. Pat. No. 6,051,746 (polynuclear aromatic modifier), U.S. Pat. No. 6,225,254 (heating template), PCT WO 01/36329 published May 25, 2001 (surfactant synthesis), PCT WO 01/25151 published Apr. 12, 2001 (staged acid addition), PCT WO 01/60746 published Aug. 23, 2001 (silicon oil), U.S. patent application Publication No. 20020055433 published May 9, 2002 (cooling molecular sieve), U.S. Pat. No. 6,448,197 (metal impregnation including copper), U.S. Pat. No. 6,521,562 (conductive microfilter), and U.S. patent application Publication No. 20020115897 published Aug. 22, 2002 (freeze drying the molecular sieve), which are all herein fully incorporated by reference.
Once the crystalline molecular sieve product is formed, usually in a slurry state, it may be recovered by any standard technique well known in the art, for example, by centrifugation or filtration. The recovered crystalline particle product, normally termed the “wet filter cake”, may then be washed, such as with water, and then dried, such as in air, before being formulated into a catalyst composition. Alternatively, the wet filter cake may be formulated into a catalyst composition directly, that is without any drying, or after only partial drying.
B. Making Formulated Molecular Sieve Catalyst
1. Molecular Sieve Crystals
Molecular sieve crystals used in this invention have different morphologies. A molecular sieve crystal having a platelet morphology is exemplified in
The term “substantially all” used herein means at least 50 wt. %, preferably 52 wt. %, more preferably at least 54 wt. %, most preferably at least 55 wt. % of the molecular sieve crystals has the morphology as indicated in the SEM image.
We discovered that the catalyst made with a cube morphology molecular sieve has the lowest attrition index and the catalyst made with a thin platelets morphology molecular sieve has the highest attrition index. We discovered surprisingly that any catalyst made with a mixing morphology or mixing two or more molecular sieves having different morphologies (cube vs. platelet) can achieve an intermediate attrition index. We discovered that a desired attrition index can be achieved by selecting a molecular sieve having cube, platelet, thin platelet, or stacked platelet and cube morphologies or by mixing two or more molecular sieves having cube, platelet, thin platelet, or stacked platelet and cube morphologies. The weight ratio of the cube morphology molecular sieve over the platelets morphology molecular sieve used in make the catalyst has a range from about 0:100 to 100:0, preferably from 1:90 to 50:50.
Molecular sieve crystals made using hydrothermal synthesis processes often take different size and shape, or having different morphology and size depending synthesis conditions, composition. The catalytic performance and other characteristics, for example, its formability, depend strongly on size and morphology of the crystalline materials.
We have found that the formability and attrition performance of the formulated and spray dried products derived from the formulated slurries of SAPO molecular sieve and/or the molecular sieve having an XRD of Table 1 depend strongly on the size and morphology of the molecular sieve crystals.
For any crystal, its size can be determined using conventional imaging and size measurement techniques, for example, optical or electron microscope. However, crystals from any synthesis batch may have different size and/or morphology.
Properties, like surface area, which is measurement of external surface area and internal surface area (pore surface area) of all crystals or particulates, are readily obtained by conventional BET and t-plot methods.
External surface area (or geometric surface area) can be measured. This external surface area is a measurement of both crystal or particle size and morphology. Crystals of smaller sizes have higher external surface area. Crystals of similar size but having more symmetric three dimensions morphologies, e.g., cubes, spheres, short cylinders (length equals diameter) have higher geometric surface area than asymmetric morphology, e.g., thin platelets and needles.
Three dimension parameters, D1, D2, and D3 are used to best represent a crystal dimension. For a cube, D1=D2=D3. For simplicity, the maximal dimension of D1, D2, and D3 is normalized as 1, then, a cube has a geometric surface area of 6*(1×1)=6, its volume is 1*1*1=1, it has a surface area to volume ratio of 6. Similarly, for a sphere, it has a surface area to volume ratio of 6 and a cylinder with equal dimension (length equal to diameter) also has a surface area to volume ratio of 6. Therefore, any symmetric three-dimension object has a geometric surface area to volume ratio of 6. Asymmetric 3-dimension object has geometric surface area to volume ratio greater 6. Smaller crystals have a higher geometric surface area to volume ratio than 6 as shown in Table 2.
Crystals having different morphology and different size give a different surface area to volume ratio. For crystals whose largest dimension is normalized to unity provided that it is at or greater than one micron but smaller than 5 microns. It is defined that a crystal having a geometric surface area to volume ratio of 6 has a Morphology and Size Index (MSI) unity. Therefore, crystals of different morphology and size will have MSI ranging from 1 to approach infinity. Symmetric three-dimension crystals, e.g., cubes, spheres, and equal dimensional cylinders have a MSI of 1, while less symmetric crystals, e.g., platelets (half-cube, quarter-cube) and very thin platelets have a MSI significantly greater than 1. The closer to MSI of 1 the more symmetric of the crystal morphology and the bigger the crystals. Likewise, the greater the MSI, the more asymmetric of the crystal morphology and the smaller the crystals.
TABLE 2
Morphology & Size Index (MSI) of Different Crystal Sizes and Morphologies
Surface
Radius of
SA of
Area
Geometric
Sphere of
Sphere of
Morphology
to Volume
Morphology
Surface
Equal
Equivalent
Sphericity
Index
Ratio
and Size
Morphology Description
D1
D2
D3
Area
Volume
Volume
Volume
Value (SV)
(min/max)
(SAVR)
Index (MSI)
cube
1.00
1.00
1.00
6.00
1.00
0.62
4.84
0.81
1.00
6.00
1.00
half-cube
1.00
1.00
0.50
4.00
0.50
0.49
3.05
0.76
0.50
8.00
1.33
quarter-cube
1.00
1.00
0.25
3.00
0.25
0.39
1.92
0.64
0.25
12.00
2.00
tenth-cube
1.00
1.00
0.10
2.40
0.10
0.29
1.04
0.43
0.10
24.00
4.00
hundredth-cube
1.00
1.00
0.01
2.04
0.01
0.13
0.22
0.11
0.01
204.00
34.00
sphere
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.14
0.52
0.50
3.14
1.00
1.00
6.00
1.00
cylinder (equal
1.00
1.00
1.00
4.71
0.79
0.57
4.12
0.87
1.00
6.00
1.00
dimension)
cylinder (half-height)
1.00
1.00
0.50
3.14
0.39
0.45
2.59
0.83
0.50
8.00
1.33
cylinder (quarter-height)
1.00
1.00
0.25
2.36
0.20
0.36
1.63
0.69
0.25
12.00
2.00
cylinder (tenth-height)
1.00
1.00
0.10
1.88
0.08
0.27
0.89
0.47
0.10
24.00
4.00
cylinder (hundredth-height)
1.00
1.00
0.01
1.60
0.01
0.12
0.19
0.12
0.01
204.00
34.00
cube (smaller cubes)
1.00
1.00
1.00
6.00
1.00
0.62
4.84
0.81
1.00
6.00
1.00
smaller cube (½)
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.50
0.13
0.31
1.21
0.81
1.00
12.00
2.00
smaller cube (¼)
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.38
0.02
0.16
0.30
0.81
1.00
24.00
4.00
smaller cube ( 1/10)
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.06
0.00
0.06
0.05
0.81
1.00
60.00
10.00
smaller cube ( 1/100)
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.81
1.00
600.00
100.00
Crystals have a MSI close to 1, preferably lower than 4, more preferably lower than 2.3, are easier to formulate and their formulated slurries produce spray dried products having low attrition rate, while crystals having MSI greater than 4, especially, having MSI greater than 10, their formulated slurries result in spray dried products having poor attrition performance.
2. Components of Formulated Molecular Sieve Catalyst
Molecular sieve catalyst, which contains molecular sieve crystal product, binder and matrix materials, is also referred to as a formulated catalyst. It is made by mixing together molecular sieve crystals (which preferably includes template) and a liquid, with matrix material and binder, to form a slurry. The slurry is then dried (i.e., liquid is removed), without completely removing the template from the molecular sieve. Since this dried molecular sieve catalyst includes template, it has not been activated, and is considered a preformed catalyst. The catalyst in this form is resistant to catalytic loss by contact with moisture or water. However, the preformed catalyst must be activated before use, and this invention provides appropriate methods of activating, preferably by further heat treatment, to maintain a low water content within the activated catalyst.
The liquid used to form the slurry can be any liquid conventionally used in formulating molecular sieve catalysts. Non-limiting examples of suitable liquids include water, alcohol, ketones, aldehydes, esters, or a combination thereof. Water is a preferred liquid.
Matrix materials are included in the slurry used to make the formulated molecular sieve catalyst of this invention. Such materials are typically effective as thermal sinks assisting in shielding heat from the catalyst composition, for example, during regeneration. They can further act to densify the catalyst composition, increase catalyst strength such as crush strength and attrition resistance, and to control the rate of conversion in a particular process. Non-limiting examples of matrix materials include one or more of: rare earth metals, metal oxides including titania, zirconia, magnesia, thoria, beryllia, quartz, silica or sols, and mixtures thereof; for example, silica-magnesia, silica-zirconia, silica-titania, silica-alumina and silica-alumina-thoria.
One preferred type of matrix material used to make the catalyst of this invention is clay. Particularly preferred clays include kaolins such as, for example, Dixie, McNamee, Georgia and Florida clays. Optionally, the matrix material, preferably any of the clays, are calcined, acid treated, and/or chemical treated before being used as a slurry component.
In a particular embodiment, the clay has a low iron or titania content, and is most preferably kaolin clay. Kaolin has been found to form a pumpable, high solid content slurry; it has a low fresh surface area, and it packs together easily due to its platelet structure.
Preferably, the clay has an average particle size of from about 0.05 μm to about 0.75 μm; more preferably from about 0.1 μm to about 0.6 μm. It is also desirable that the clay material have a d90 particle size distribution of less than about 1.5 μm, preferably less than about 1 μm.
Binders are also included in the slurry used to make the formulated molecular sieve catalyst of this invention. In one embodiment of the invention, the binder is an alumina-containing sol, preferably aluminium chlorohydrate. Upon calcining, the inorganic oxide sol, is converted into an inorganic oxide matrix component, which is particularly effective in forming an attrition resistant molecular sieve catalyst. For example, an alumina sol will convert to an aluminium oxide matrix following heat treatment.
Aluminium chlorohydrate, a hydroxylated aluminium based sol containing a chloride counter ion, also known as aluminium chlorohydrol, has the general formula
AlmOn(OH)oClp.x(H2O)
wherein m is 1 to 20, n is 1 to 8, o is 5 to 40, p is 2 to 15, and x is 0 to 30. In one embodiment, the binder is Al13O4(OH)24Cl7.12(H2O) as is described in G. M. Wolterman et al., Stud. Surf. Sci. and Catal., 76, pages 105-144, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993, which is herein incorporated by reference. In another embodiment, one or more binders are present in combination with one or more other non-limiting examples of alumina materials such as aluminium oxyhydroxide, γ-alumina, boehmite and transitional aluminas such as α-alumina, β-alumina, γ*alumina, δ-alumina, ε-alumina, κ-alumina, and ρ-alumina, aluminium trihydroxide, such as gibbsite, bayerite, nordstrandite, doyelite, and mixtures thereof.
Aluminum chlorohydrate can prepared by dissolving either metallic aluminum or hydrated alumina in hydrochloric acid under controlled conditions, and is available commercially in different forms, such as solid products; for example, the solid of chemical formula Al2(OH)5Cl.n(H2O) or as pre-prepared, commercially available, aqueous solutions. Other non-limiting examples of useful aluminum oxide precursors that may be used according to this invention include aluminum hexahydrate, aluminum pentachlorohydrate (Al2(OH)Cl5), aluminum tetrachlorohydrate (Al2(OH)2Cl4), aluminum trichlorohydrate (Al2(OH)3Cl3), aluminum dichlorohydrate (Al2(OH)4Cl2), aluminum sesquichlorohydrate (Al2(OH)4.5Cl1.5).
Other non-limiting examples of binders useful according to this invention include precursors of aluminum-zirconium oxides. Such precursors include, but are not limited to, aluminum zirconium chlorohydrates; for example, aluminum zirconium trichlorohydrate, aluminum zirconium tetrachlorohydrate, aluminum zirconium pentachlorohydrate, aluminum zirconium octachlorohydrate, aluminum zirconium chlorohydrex, aluminum zirconium chlorohydrex glycine complexes (e.g., aluminum zirconium trichlorohydrex glycine complex, aluminum zirconium tetrachlorohydrex glycine complex, aluminum zirconium pentachlorohydrex glycine complex, and aluminum zirconium octachlorohydrex glycine complex). In the absence of glycine, these materials form gels in aqueous solutions. Reheis Chemicals Inc., Berkeley Heights, N.J. produces a variety of aluminum zirconium chlorohydrates. These materials can be prepared from a variety of zirconium starting materials such as zirconyl chloride (ZrOCl2), zirconyl hydroxychloride (ZrO(OH)Cl), zirconium hydroxy carbonate paste (ZrO(OH)(CO3)0.5), and combinations of these zirconium starting materials, with a hydrated aluminum solution, such as a solution of aluminum chlorohydrate, aluminum hexahydrate, aluminum sesquichlorohydrate or aluminum dichlorohydrate solution, or a solution obtained by combining one or several of these aluminum species solutions.
In another embodiment, the binders are alumina sols, predominantly comprising aluminium oxide, optionally including silicon. In yet another embodiment, the binders are peptised alumina made by treating alumina hydrates such as pseudobohemite, with an acid, preferably a non-halogen acid, to prepare sols or aluminium ion solutions. Non-limiting examples of commercially available colloidal alumina sols include Nalco 8676 available from Nalco Chemical Co., Naperville, Ill., and Nyacol available from the Nyacol Nano Technology Inc., Boston, Mass.
In a preferred embodiment, the amount of binder used to prepare the molecular sieve catalyst is at least 5 wt %, based on total weight of the material used to make the composition, excluding liquid (i.e., after drying), particularly excluding water. Preferably the amount of binder used to prepare the molecular sieve catalyst is at least 8 wt %, and more preferably at least 10 wt %, based on total weight of the material used in making the catalyst, excluding liquid (i.e., after drying). It is also preferred that the amount of binder used to prepare the molecular sieve catalyst is not greater than about 50 wt %, preferably not greater than 40 wt %, and more preferably not greater than 30 wt %, based on total weight of the material used in making the catalyst, excluding liquid (i.e., after drying).
3. Making a Slurry with Molecular Sieve Crystals
The molecular sieve crystals are mixed with clay and binder, as well as liquid solvent component, to form a slurry. The components can be mixed in any order, and the mixture is thoroughly stirred to form the slurry. The more thorough the stirring, the better the consistency of the slurry, and the more uniform will be the dried catalyst composition.
The molecular sieve crystals, clay and binder are mixed together at a breakage energy effective to break apart agglomerates and aggregates, as defined in Practical Dispersion, R. F. Conley, VCH, New York, p. 213, 1996, which is incorporated herein by reference. Mixers capable of mixing together components at the appropriate breakage energy include impeller mills, ball mills, stirred media mills, vibratory mills, multiple roll mills and ultrasonic dispersion devices. Further description of appropriate mixing equipment is described in Solid-Liquid Dispersions, B. Dobias et al., pp. 22-27, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999, which is incorporated herein by reference.
In one embodiment, the molecular sieve crystals, clay and binder are mixed together at the appropriate breakage energy using a bead mill mixer.
In one embodiment, the components used to make the molecular sieve catalyst are mixed at breakage energy of at least 10−5 cal cm−2. Preferably, the components used to make the molecular sieve catalyst are mixed at breakage energy of at least 5×10−4 cal cm−2, and more preferably at least 10−4 cal cm−2.
The breakage energy should high enough to obtain the desired characteristics of the invention. However, the breakage energy should not be so high as to break apart chemical bonds. In another embodiment, the components used to make the molecular sieve catalyst are mixed at breakage energy of not greater than 10−1 cal cm−2. Preferably, the components used to make the molecular sieve catalyst are mixed at breakage energy of not greater than 6×10−2 cal cm−2, and more preferably not greater than 5×10−2 cal cm−2. Bead mills typically generate a breakage energy of 6×10−5 to 6×10−2 cal cm2, whereas impeller mills typically generate a breakage energy of 10−5 to 2×10−4 cal cm−1, and ball mills generate a breakage energy of 10−5 to 6×10−3 cal cm−2.
In one embodiment, the slurry has a viscosity of at least 400 cP (0.4 Pa/sec), as measured using a Brookfield LV-DVE viscometer with a No. 3 spindle at 10 RPM. Preferably, the slurry has a viscosity of at least 500 cP (0.5 Pa/sec), more preferably at least 600 cP (0.6 Pa/sec), and most preferably at least 700 cP (0.7 Pa/sec), as measured using a Brookfield LV-DVE viscometer with a No. 3 spindle at 10 RPM. It is also preferred that the slurry have a viscosity that is not greater than 12,500 cP (12.5 Pa/sec), as measured using a Brookfield LV-DVE viscometer with a No. 3 spindle at 10 RPM. Preferably, the slurry has a viscosity not greater than 11,000 cP (11 Pa/sec), and more preferably not greater than 10,500 cP (10.5 Pa/sec), as measured using a Brookfield LV-DVE viscometer with a No. 3 spindle at 10 RPM.
In another embodiment, the slurry has a solids content of at least 40 wt %, based on total weight of the slurry mixture. Preferably, the slurry has a solids content of at least 41 wt %, more preferably at least 42 wt %, and most preferably at least 42.5 wt %, based on the total weight of the slurry. The solids content can be measured using any conventional means. However, a CEM MAS 700 microwave muffle furnace is particularly preferred to give results consistent with the values recited herein. It is also preferred that the slurry have a solids content of not greater than 60 wt %, based on total weight of the slurry. Preferably, the slurry has a solids content of not greater than 58 wt %, more preferably not greater than 56 wt %, and most preferably not greater than 54 wt % based on total weight of the slurry.
In another embodiment of the invention, the molecular sieve crystals, clay and binder are mixed together to form a slurry mixture at a binder to molecular sieve weight ratio of at least 0.20:1. Preferably, the molecular sieve crystals, clay and binder are mixed together at a binder to molecular sieve weight ratio of at least 0.22:1, more preferably at least 0.24:1, and most preferably at least 0.25:1. It is also preferred that the crystals, clay and binder be mixed together at a binder to molecular sieve weight ratio of not greater than 0.8:1, preferably not greater than 0.6:1.
In another embodiment, the molecular sieve crystals, clay and binder are mixed together to form a slurry mixture at a binder content of at least 5 wt %, preferably at least 8 wt %, and more preferably at least 10 wt %, based on total weight of the mixture, excluding liquid (e.g., water). It is also preferred in an embodiment that the molecular sieve crystals, clay and binder are mixed together to form a slurry mixture at a binder content of not greater than 30 wt %, preferably not greater than 25 wt %, based on total weight of the mixture, excluding liquid (e.g., water).
In one embodiment of the invention, the slurry is aged prior to drying. In this embodiment, aging means submitting the catalyst formulation slurry to a mild thermal treatment, with or without agitation and/or stirring and/or mixing. The duration of the thermal treatment should be sufficient to allow the generation of the reactive ionic species at a sufficient rate and in an amount sufficient to allow the best attrition resistance properties in the catalyst particles.
Conditions of duration and temperature that achieve this result include: maintaining the catalyst formulation slurry at a temperature of from 0° C. to 100° C., preferably of from 10° C. to 90° C., more preferably of from 15° C. to 80° C., most preferably of from 20° C. to 70° C. The duration of this mild thermal treatment can vary, depending on various factors such as the type of inorganic oxide precursor, the concentration of the inorganic precursor and the temperature. The higher the temperature and the lower the concentration in inorganic oxide precursor, the less time will be required to achieve the proper level of aging of the catalyst formulation slurry according to the invention. Periods of aging will typically be at least 2 hours, preferably at least 4 hours, more preferably at least 5 hours, and most preferably at least 6 hours. In a preferred embodiment, aging of the catalyst formulation slurry is performed for not more than 150 hours, preferably not more than 120 hours, most preferably not more than 100 hours. If aging takes place at a temperature of from 30° C. to 50° C., aging of the catalyst formulation preferably takes place for a period of from 4 hours to 80 hours, preferably of from 5 hours to 75 hours, more preferably of from 5.5 hours to 50 hours, most preferably of from 6 hours to 36 hours.
4. Drying the Slurry
In one embodiment, the slurry of the molecular sieve, binder and matrix materials is fed to a forming unit that produces a dried molecular sieve catalyst. Non-limiting examples of forming units include spray dryers, pelletizers, extruders, etc. In a preferred embodiment, the forming unit is spray dryer. Typically, the forming unit is maintained at a temperature sufficient to remove most of the liquid (e.g., water) from the slurry.
When a spray dryer is used as the forming (or drying) unit, typically, the slurry of the molecular sieve, matrix material and binder, is co-fed to the drying unit with a drying gas. In one embodiment the drying unit has an average inlet temperature ranging from 150° C. to 550° C., and an average outlet temperature ranging from 100° C. to about 250° C.
In one embodiment, the slurry is passed through a nozzle distributing the slurry into small droplets, resembling an aerosol spray, into a drying chamber. Atomization is achieved by forcing the slurry through a single nozzle or multiple nozzles with a pressure drop in the range of from 100 psia to 1000 psia (690 kPa-a to 6895 kPa-a). In another embodiment, the slurry is co-fed through a single nozzle or multiple nozzles along with an atomization fluid such as air, steam, flue gas, or any other suitable gas.
In yet another embodiment, the slurry described above is directed to the perimeter of a spinning wheel that distributes the slurry into small droplets, the size of which is controlled by many factors including slurry viscosity, surface tension, flow rate, pressure, and temperature of the slurry, the shape and dimension of the nozzle(s), or the spinning rate of the wheel. These droplets are then dried in a co-current or counter-current flow of air passing through a spray drier to form a partially, substantially or totally dried molecular sieve catalyst.
An example of a spray drying process that may be used to dry the slurry is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,946,814, the description of which is incorporated herein by reference.
In another embodiment of the invention, the slurry is dried in a drying unit and then calcined. In one embodiment, the slurry is dried to form a dried molecular sieve catalyst, and the dried catalyst composition is calcined. In general, calcination further hardens and/or activates the dried molecular sieve catalyst. An acceptable calcination environment is air that typically includes a small amount of water vapour. Typical calcination temperatures are in the range from about 400° C. to about 1,000° C., preferably from about 500° C. to about 800° C., and most preferably from about 550° C. to about 700° C., preferably in a calcination environment such as air, nitrogen, helium, flue gas (combustion product lean in oxygen), or any combination thereof.
The dried or formulated molecular sieve catalyst can be calcined in many types of devices, including but not limited to, rotary calciners, fluid bed calciners, batch ovens, and the like. Calcination time is typically dependent on the degree of hardening of the molecular sieve catalyst and the temperature.
In a preferred embodiment, the molecular sieve catalyst is heated in nitrogen at a temperature of from about 600° C. to about 700° C. Heating is carried out for a period of time typically from 30 minutes to 15 hours, preferably from 1 hour to about 10 hours, more preferably from about 1 hour to about 5 hours, and most preferably from about 2 hours to about 4 hours.
Other methods for calcining or activating a molecular sieve catalyst are described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,185,310 (heating molecular sieve of gel alumina and water to 450° C.), and PCT WO 00/75072 published Dec. 14, 2000 (heating to leave an amount of template), which are all herein fully incorporated by reference.
The molecular sieve catalyst product made according to this invention is useful in a variety of processes including cracking of, for example, a naphtha feed to light olefin(s) (U.S. Pat. No. 6,300,537) or higher molecular weight (MW) hydrocarbons to lower MW hydrocarbons; hydrocracking of, for example, heavy petroleum and/or cyclic feedstock; isomerization of, for example, aromatics such as xylene; polymerization of, for example, one or more olefin(s) to produce a polymer product; reforming; hydrogenation; dehydrogenation; dewaxing of, for example, hydrocarbons to remove straight chain paraffins; absorption of, for example, alkyl aromatic compounds for separating out isomers thereof; alkylation of, for example, aromatic hydrocarbons such as benzene and alkyl benzene, optionally with propylene to produce cumene or with long chain olefins; transalkylation of, for example, a combination of aromatic and polyalkylaromatic hydrocarbons; dealkylation; hydrodecyclization; disproportionation of, for example, toluene to make benzene and paraxylene; oligomerization of, for example, straight and branched chain olefin(s); and dehydrocyclization.
Preferred processes include processes for converting naphtha to highly aromatic mixtures; converting light olefin(s) to gasoline, distillates and lubricants; converting oxygenates to olefin(s); converting light paraffins to olefins and/or aromatics; and converting unsaturated hydrocarbons (ethylene and/or acetylene) to aldehydes for conversion into alcohols, acids and esters.
The most preferred process of the invention is a process directed to the conversion of a feedstock to one or more olefin(s). Typically, the feedstock contains one or more aliphatic-containing compounds such that the aliphatic moiety contains from 1 to about 50 carbon atoms, such as from 1 to 20 carbon atoms, for example, from 1 to 10 carbon atoms, and particularly from 1 to 4 carbon atoms.
Non-limiting examples of aliphatic-containing compounds include alcohols such as methanol and ethanol, alkyl mercaptans such as methyl mercaptan and ethyl mercaptan, alkyl sulfides such as methyl sulfide, alkylamines such as methylamine, alkyl ethers such as dimethyl ether, diethyl ether and methylethyl ether, alkyl halides such as methyl chloride and ethyl chloride, alkyl ketones such as dimethyl ketone, formaldehydes, and various acids such as acetic acid.
In a preferred embodiment of the process of the invention, the feedstock contains one or more oxygenates, more specifically, one or more organic compound(s) containing at least one oxygen atom. In the most preferred embodiment of the process of invention, the oxygenate in the feedstock is one or more alcohol(s), preferably aliphatic alcohol(s) where the aliphatic moiety of the alcohol(s) has from 1 to 20 carbon atoms, preferably from 1 to 10 carbon atoms, and most preferably from 1 to 4 carbon atoms. The alcohols useful as feedstock in the process of the invention include lower straight and branched chain aliphatic alcohols and their unsaturated counterparts.
Non-limiting examples of oxygenates include methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, isopropanol, methyl ethyl ether, dimethyl ether, diethyl ether, di-isopropyl ether, formaldehyde, dimethyl carbonate, dimethyl ketone, acetic acid, and mixtures thereof.
In the most preferred embodiment, the feedstock is selected from one or more of methanol, ethanol, dimethyl ether, diethyl ether or a combination thereof, more preferably methanol and dimethyl ether, and most preferably methanol.
The various feedstocks discussed above, particularly a feedstock containing an oxygenate, more particularly a feedstock containing an alcohol, is converted primarily into one or more olefin(s). The olefin(s) produced from the feedstock typically have from 2 to 30 carbon atoms, preferably 2 to 8 carbon atoms, more preferably 2 to 6 carbon atoms, still more preferably 2 to 4 carbons atoms, and most preferably are ethylene and/or propylene.
The catalyst composition of the invention is particularly useful in the process that is generally referred to as the gas-to-olefins (GTO) process or, alternatively, the methanol-to-olefins (MTO) process. In this process, an oxygenated feedstock, most preferably a methanol-containing feedstock, is converted in the presence of a molecular sieve catalyst into one or more olefin(s), preferably and predominantly, ethylene and/or propylene.
Using the catalyst composition of the invention for the conversion of a feedstock, preferably a feedstock containing one or more oxygenates, the amount of olefin(s) produced based on the total weight of hydrocarbon produced is greater than 50 weight percent, typically greater than 60 weight percent, such as greater than 70 weight percent, and preferably greater than 75 weight percent. In one embodiment, the amount of ethylene and/or propylene produced based on the total weight of hydrocarbon product produced is greater than 65 weight percent, such as greater than 70 weight percent, for example, greater than 75 weight percent, and preferably greater than 78 weight percent. Typically, the amount ethylene produced in weight percent based on the total weight of hydrocarbon product produced, is greater than 30 weight percent, such as greater than 35 weight percent, for example, greater than 40 weight percent. In addition, the amount of propylene produced in weight percent based on the total weight of hydrocarbon product produced is greater than 20 weight percent, such as greater than 25 weight percent, for example, greater than 30 weight percent, and preferably greater than 35 weight percent.
In addition to the oxygenate component, such as methanol, the feedstock may contains one or more diluent(s), which are generally non-reactive to the feedstock or molecular sieve catalyst and are typically used to reduce the concentration of the feedstock. Non-limiting examples of diluents include helium, argon, nitrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, water, essentially non-reactive paraffins (especially alkanes such as methane, ethane, and propane), essentially non-reactive aromatic compounds, and mixtures thereof. The most preferred diluents are water and nitrogen, with water being particularly preferred.
The diluent, for example water, may be used either in a liquid or a vapor form, or a combination thereof. The diluent may be either added directly to the feedstock entering a reactor or added directly to the reactor, or added with the molecular sieve catalyst.
The present process can be conducted over a wide range of temperatures, such as in the range of from about 200° C. to about 1000° C., for example from about 250° C. to about 800° C., including from about 250° C. to about 750° C., conveniently from about 300° C. to about 650° C., typically from about 350° C. to about 600° C. and particularly from about 350° C. to about 550° C.
Similarly, the present process can be conducted over a wide range of pressures including autogenous pressure. Typically the partial pressure of the feedstock exclusive of any diluent therein employed in the process is in the range of from about 0.1 kPa-a to about 5 MPaa, such as from about 5 kPa-a to about 1 MPaa, and conveniently from about 20 kPa-a to about 500 kPa-a.
The weight hourly space velocity (WHSV), defined as the total weight of feedstock excluding any diluents per hour per weight of molecular sieve in the catalyst composition, typically ranges from about 1 hr−1 to about 5000 hr−1, such as from about 2 hr−1 to about 3000 hr−1, for example from about 5 hr−1 to about 1500 hr−1, and conveniently from about 10 hr−1 to about 1000 hr−1. In one embodiment, the WHSV is greater than 20 hr−1 and, where feedstock contains methanol and/or dimethyl ether, is in the range of from about 20 hr−1 to about 300 hr−1.
Where the process is conducted in a fluidized bed, the superficial gas velocity (SGV) of the feedstock including diluent and reaction products within the reactor system, and particularly within a riser reactor(s), is at least 0.1 meter per second (m/sec), such as greater than 0.5 msec, such as greater than 1 msec, for example greater than 2 msec, conveniently greater than 3 msec, and typically greater than 4 msec. See for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,552,240, which is herein incorporated by reference.
The process of the invention is conveniently conducted as a fixed bed process, or more typically as a fluidized bed process (including a turbulent bed process), such as a continuous fluidized bed process, and particularly a continuous high velocity fluidized bed process.
The process can take place in a variety of catalytic reactors such as hybrid reactors that have a dense bed or fixed bed reaction zones and/or fast fluidized bed reaction zones coupled together, circulating fluidized bed reactors, riser reactors, and the like. Suitable conventional reactor types are described in for example U.S. Pat. No. 4,076,796, U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,522 (dual riser), and Fluidization Engineering, D. Kunii and O. Levenspiel, Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, New York, N.Y. 1977, which are all herein fully incorporated by reference.
The preferred reactor types are riser reactors generally described in Riser Reactor, Fluidization and Fluid-Particle Systems, pages 48 to 59, F. A. Zenz and D. F. Othmo, Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York, 1960, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,166,282 (fast-fluidized bed reactor), and U.S. Pat. No. 7,102,050 (multiple riser reactor), which are all herein fully incorporated by reference.
In one practical embodiment, the process is conducted as a fluidized bed process or high velocity fluidized bed process utilizing a reactor system, a regeneration system and a recovery system.
In such a process the reactor system conveniently includes a fluid bed reactor system having a first reaction zone within one or more riser reactor(s) and a second reaction zone within at least one disengaging vessel, typically comprising one or more cyclones. In one embodiment, the one or more riser reactor(s) and disengaging vessel are contained within a single reactor vessel. Fresh feedstock, preferably containing one or more oxygenates, optionally with one or more diluent(s), is fed to the one or more riser reactor(s) into which a molecular sieve catalyst or coked version thereof is introduced. In one embodiment, prior to being introduced to the riser reactor(s), the molecular sieve catalyst or coked version thereof is contacted with a liquid, preferably water or methanol, and/or a gas, for example, an inert gas such as nitrogen.
In an embodiment, the amount of fresh feedstock fed as a liquid and/or a vapor to the reactor system is in the range of from 0.1 weight percent to about 85 weight percent, such as from about 1 weight percent to about 75 weight percent, more typically from about 5 weight percent to about 65 weight percent based on the total weight of the feedstock including any diluent contained therein. The liquid and vapor feedstocks may be the same composition, or may contain varying proportions of the same or different feedstocks with the same or different diluents.
The feedstock entering the reactor system is preferably converted, partially or fully, in the first reactor zone into a gaseous effluent that enters the disengaging vessel along with the coked catalyst composition. In the preferred embodiment, cyclone(s) are provided within the disengaging vessel to separate the coked catalyst composition from the gaseous effluent containing one or more olefin(s) within the disengaging vessel. Although cyclones are preferred, gravity effects within the disengaging vessel can also be used to separate the catalyst composition from the gaseous effluent. Other methods for separating the catalyst composition from the gaseous effluent include the use of plates, caps, elbows, and the like.
In one embodiment, the disengaging vessel includes a stripping zone, typically in a lower portion of the disengaging vessel. In the stripping zone the coked catalyst composition is contacted with a gas, preferably one or a combination of steam, methane, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, or an inert gas such as argon, preferably steam, to recover adsorbed hydrocarbons from the coked catalyst composition that is then introduced to the regeneration system.
The coked catalyst composition is withdrawn from the disengaging vessel and introduced to the regeneration system. The regeneration system comprises a regenerator where the coked catalyst composition is contacted with a regeneration medium, preferably a gas containing oxygen, under conventional regeneration conditions of temperature, pressure and residence time.
Non-limiting examples of suitable regeneration media include one or more of oxygen, 03, SO3, N2O, NO, NO2, N2O5, air, air diluted with nitrogen or carbon dioxide, oxygen and water (U.S. Pat. No. 6,245,703), carbon monoxide and/or hydrogen. Suitable regeneration conditions are those capable of burning coke from the coked catalyst composition, preferably to a level less than 0.5 weight percent based on the total weight of the coked molecular sieve catalyst entering the regeneration system. For example, the regeneration temperature may be in the range of from about 200° C. to about 1500° C., such as from about 300° C. to about 1000° C., for example, from about 450° C. to about 750° C., and conveniently from about 550° C. to 700° C. The regeneration pressure may be in the range of from about 15 psia (103 kPa-a) to about 500 psia (3448 kPa-a), such as from about 20 psia (138 kPa-a) to about 250 psia (1724 kPa-a), including from about 25 psia (172 kPa-a) to about 150 psia (1034 kPa-a), and conveniently from about 30 psia (207 kPa-a) to about 60 psia (414 kPa-a).
The residence time of the catalyst composition in the regenerator may be in the range of from about one minute to several hours, such as from about one minute to 100 minutes, and the volume of oxygen in the regeneration gas may be in the range of from about 0.01 mole percent to about 5 mole percent based on the total volume of the gas.
The burning of coke in the regeneration step is an exothermic reaction, and in an embodiment, the temperature within the regeneration system is controlled by various techniques in the art including feeding a cooled gas to the regenerator vessel, operated either in a batch, continuous, or semi-continuous mode, or a combination thereof. A preferred technique involves withdrawing the regenerated catalyst composition from the regeneration system and passing it through a catalyst cooler to form a cooled regenerated catalyst composition. The catalyst cooler, in an embodiment, is a heat exchanger that is located either internal or external to the regeneration system. Other methods for operating a regeneration system are in disclosed U.S. Pat. No. 6,290,916 (controlling moisture), which is herein fully incorporated by reference.
The regenerated catalyst composition withdrawn from the regeneration system, preferably from the catalyst cooler, is combined with a fresh molecular sieve catalyst and/or re-circulated molecular sieve catalyst and/or feedstock and/or fresh gas or liquids, and returned to the riser reactor(s). In one embodiment, the regenerated catalyst composition withdrawn from the regeneration system is returned to the riser reactor(s) directly, preferably after passing through a catalyst cooler. A carrier, such as an inert gas, feedstock vapor, steam or the like, may be used, semi-continuously or continuously, to facilitate the introduction of the regenerated catalyst composition to the reactor system, preferably to the one or more riser reactor(s).
By controlling the flow of the regenerated catalyst composition or cooled regenerated catalyst composition from the regeneration system to the reactor system, the optimum level of coke on the molecular sieve catalyst entering the reactor is maintained. There are many techniques for controlling the flow of a catalyst composition described in Michael Louge, Experimental Techniques, Circulating Fluidized Beds, Grace, Avidan and Knowlton, eds., Blackie, 1997 (336-337), which is herein incorporated by reference.
Coke levels on the catalyst composition are measured by withdrawing the catalyst composition from the conversion process and determining its carbon content. Typical levels of coke on the molecular sieve catalyst, after regeneration, are in the range of from 0.01 weight percent to about 15 weight percent, such as from about 0.1 weight percent to about 10 weight percent, for example from about 0.2 weight percent to about 5 weight percent, and conveniently from about 0.3 weight percent to about 2 weight percent based on the weight of the molecular sieve.
The gaseous effluent is withdrawn from the disengaging system and is passed through a recovery system. There are many well-known recovery systems, techniques and sequences that are useful in separating olefin(s) and purifying olefin(s) from the gaseous effluent. Recovery systems generally comprise one or more or a combination of various separation, fractionation and/or distillation towers, columns, splitters, or trains, reaction systems such as ethylbenzene manufacture (U.S. Pat. No. 5,476,978) and other derivative processes such as aldehydes, ketones and ester manufacture (U.S. Pat. No. 5,675,041), and other associated equipment, for example various condensers, heat exchangers, refrigeration systems or chill trains, compressors, knock-out drums or pots, pumps, and the like.
Non-limiting examples of these towers, columns, splitters or trains used alone or in combination include one or more of a demethanizer, preferably a high temperature demethanizer, a deethanizer, a depropanizer, a wash tower often referred to as a caustic wash tower and/or quench tower, absorbers, adsorbers, membranes, ethylene splitter, propylene splitter and butene splitter.
Various recovery systems useful for recovering olefin(s), such as ethylene, propylene and/or butene, are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,960,643 (secondary rich ethylene stream), U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,019,143, 5,452,581 and 5,082,481 (membrane separations), U.S. Pat. No. 5,672,197 (pressure dependent adsorbents), U.S. Pat. No. 6,069,288 (hydrogen removal), U.S. Pat. No. 5,904,880 (recovered methanol to hydrogen and carbon dioxide in one step), U.S. Pat. No. 5,927,063 (recovered methanol to gas turbine power plant), and U.S. Pat. No. 6,121,504 (direct product quench), U.S. Pat. No. 6,121,503 (high purity olefins without superfractionation), and U.S. Pat. No. 6,293,998 (pressure swing adsorption), which are all herein fully incorporated by reference.
Other recovery systems that include purification systems, for example for the purification of olefin(s), are described in Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th Edition, Vol. 9, John Wiley & Sons, 1996, pages 249-271 and 894-899, which is herein incorporated by reference. Purification systems are also described in for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,271,428 (purification of a diolefin hydrocarbon stream), U.S. Pat. No. 6,293,999 (separating propylene from propane), and U.S. Pat. No. 6,593,506 (purge stream using hydrating catalyst), which are herein incorporated by reference.
Generally accompanying most recovery systems is the production, generation or accumulation of additional products, by-products and/or contaminants along with the preferred prime products. The preferred prime products, the light olefins, such as ethylene and propylene, are typically purified for use in derivative manufacturing processes such as polymerization processes. Therefore, in the most preferred embodiment of the recovery system, the recovery system also includes a purification system. For example, the light olefin(s) produced particularly in a MTO process are passed through a purification system that removes low levels of by-products or contaminants.
Non-limiting examples of contaminants and by-products include generally polar compounds such as water, alcohols, carboxylic acids, ethers, carbon oxides, sulfur compounds such as hydrogen sulfide, carbonyl sulfides and mercaptans, ammonia and other nitrogen compounds, arsine, phosphine and chlorides. Other contaminants or by-products include hydrogen and hydrocarbons such as acetylene, methyl acetylene, propadiene, butadiene and butyne.
Typically, in converting one or more oxygenates to olefin(s) having 2 or 3 carbon atoms, a minor amount hydrocarbons, particularly olefin(s), having 4 or more carbon atoms is also produced. The amount of C4+hydrocarbons is normally less than 20 weight percent, such as less than 10 weight percent, for example, less than 5 weight percent, and particularly less than 2 weight percent, based on the total weight of the effluent gas withdrawn from the process, excluding water. Typically, therefore the recovery system may include one or more reaction systems for converting the C4+ impurities to useful products.
Non-limiting examples of such reaction systems are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,955,640 (converting a four carbon product into butene-1), U.S. Pat. No. 4,774,375 (isobutane and butene-2 oligomerized to an alkylate gasoline), U.S. Pat. No. 6,049,017 (dimerization of n-butylene), U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,287,369 and 5,763,678 (carbonylation or hydroformulation of higher olefins with carbon dioxide and hydrogen making carbonyl compounds), U.S. Pat. No. 4,542,252 (multistage adiabatic process), U.S. Pat. No. 5,634,354 (olefin-hydrogen recovery), and Cosyns, J. et al., Process for Upgrading C3, C4 and C5 Olefinic Streams, Pet. & Coal, Vol. 37, No. 4 (1995) (dimerizing or oligomerizing propylene, butylene and pentylene), which are all fully herein incorporated by reference.
The preferred light olefin(s) produced by any one of the processes described above are high purity prime olefin(s) products that contain a single carbon number olefin in an amount greater than 80 percent, such as greater than 90 weight percent, such as greater than 95 weight percent, for example at least about 99 weight percent, based on the total weight of the olefin.
In one practical embodiment, the process of the invention forms part of an integrated process for producing light olefin(s) from a hydrocarbon feedstock, preferably a gaseous hydrocarbon feedstock, particularly methane and/or ethane. The first step in the process is passing the gaseous feedstock, preferably in combination with a water stream, to a syngas production zone to produce a synthesis gas (syngas) stream, typically comprising carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Syngas production is well known, and typical syngas temperatures are in the range of from about 700° C. to about 1200° C. and syngas pressures are in the range of from about 2 MPa to about 100 MPa. Synthesis gas streams are produced from natural gas, petroleum liquids, and carbonaceous materials such as coal, recycled plastic, municipal waste or any other organic material. Preferably synthesis gas stream is produced via steam reforming of natural gas.
The next step in the process involves contacting the synthesis gas stream generally with a heterogeneous catalyst, typically a copper based catalyst, to produce an oxygenate containing stream, often in combination with water. In one embodiment, the contacting step is conducted at temperature in the range of from about 150° C. to about 450° C. and a pressure in the range of from about 5 MPa to about 10 MPa.
This oxygenate containing stream, or crude methanol, typically contains the alcohol product and various other components such as ethers, particularly dimethyl ether, ketones, aldehydes, dissolved gases such as hydrogen methane, carbon oxide and nitrogen, and fuel oil. The oxygenate containing stream, crude methanol, in the preferred embodiment is passed through a well known purification processes, distillation, separation and fractionation, resulting in a purified oxygenate containing stream, for example, commercial Grade A and AA methanol.
The oxygenate containing stream or purified oxygenate containing stream, optionally with one or more diluents, can then be used as a feedstock in a process to produce light olefin(s), such as ethylene and/or propylene. Non-limiting examples of this integrated process are described in EP-B-0 933 345, which is herein fully incorporated by reference.
In one embodiment, the oxygenate has a flow rate of at least 100 kg/hr, preferably at least 1000 kg/hr.
In another more fully integrated process that optionally is combined with the integrated processes described above, the olefin(s) produced are directed to, in one embodiment, one or more polymerization processes for producing various polyolefins. (See for example U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/615,376 filed Jul. 13, 2000, which is herein fully incorporated by reference.)
Polymerization processes include solution, gas phase, slurry phase and a high pressure processes, or a combination thereof. Particularly preferred is a gas phase or a slurry phase polymerization of one or more olefin(s) at least one of which is ethylene or propylene. These polymerization processes utilize a polymerization catalyst that can include any one or a combination of the molecular sieve catalysts discussed above. However, the preferred polymerization catalysts are the Ziegler-Natta, Phillips-type, metallocene, metallocene-type and advanced polymerization catalysts, and mixtures thereof.
In a preferred embodiment, the integrated process comprises a process for polymerizing one or more olefin(s) in the presence of a polymerization catalyst system in a polymerization reactor to produce one or more polymer products, wherein the one or more olefin(s) have been made by converting an alcohol, particularly methanol, using a molecular sieve catalyst as described above. The preferred polymerization process is a gas phase polymerization process and at least one of the olefins(s) is either ethylene or propylene, and preferably the polymerization catalyst system is a supported metallocene catalyst system. In this embodiment, the supported metallocene catalyst system comprises a support, a metallocene or metallocene-type compound and an activator, preferably the activator is a non-coordinating anion or alumoxane, or combination thereof, and most preferably the activator is alumoxane.
The polymers produced by the polymerization processes described above include linear low density polyethylene, elastomers, plastomers, high density polyethylene, low density polyethylene, polypropylene and polypropylene copolymers. The propylene based polymers produced by the polymerization processes include atactic polypropylene, isotactic polypropylene, syndiotactic polypropylene, and propylene random, block or impact copolymers.
These and other facets of the present invention is exemplified from the examples followed.
The Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images were obtained on a JEOL JSM-6340F Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope, using a magnification at a voltage of 2 keV.
Molecular Sieve Preparation
Five synthetic mixtures were prepared (while keeping a temperature below 20° C. and stirring continuously) using de-mineralized water, phosphoric acid in water (85%), colloidal silica (Ludox AS40), TEAOH solution (Sachem, 35 wt. %), and pseudoboehmite (Condea Pural SB1) with the following molar formula:
0.10SiO2:Al2O3:P2O5:TEAOH: 34H2O
by adding phosphoric acid in water (85 wt. %) to de-mineralized water. Then colloidal silica (Ludox AS40) was added followed by TEAOH solution (Sachem, 35 wt. %) and pseudoboehmite (Condea Pural SB1). The five mixtures were then heated in autoclaves to the synthesis temperature as listed in the following table with a ramping rate as listed in the following table, while stirring. After the crystallization the autoclave was cooled to room temperature and the crystals were recovered, washed and dried.
Synthesis
Ramping Rate
Synthesis
Sample
Temperature (° C.)
(° C./Hr)
Time (hr)
MSI
A
175
13
50
2.33
B
170
13
100
1
C
175
13
100
1.22
D
175
6.4
60
1.14
E
175
13
50
4.1
The XRD of samples A to E after calcination and avoiding re-hydration after calcination, having at least the reflections in the 5 to 25 (2θ) range as shown in Table 1.
The SEM images showed sample A (
A slurry containing 45 wt. % solid was prepared according to this procedure: (A) adding 174.9 g of aluminum chlorohydrate MicroDry (ACH, from Reheis Inc., Berkeley Heights, N.J.) to 668.3 g of deionized water and mixed at 700 rotations per minute (RPM) for 10 minutes using a Yamato Model 2100 homogenizer (Yamato Scientific America Inc., Orangeburg, N.Y.) to give a solution having pH of 3.97 at 23.8° C.; (B) adding 348.7 g of molecular sieve A (dried at 120° C. for 16 hr) to the solution from step (A) and mixed at 700 RPM for 10 minutes using the Yamato homogenizer Model 2100 used in step (A), the slurry thus obtained having a pH of 3.88 measured at 30.8° C.; (C) adding 408.1 g of ASP Ultrafine kaolin clay (Engelhard Corporation, Iselin, N.J.) while under mixing at 700 RPM using the Yamato Model 2100 homogenizer, the resulting slurry having a pH of 3.87 at 24.7° C.; (D) passing the slurry from step (C) through a bead mill, Eiger MINI bead mill model M250 (Eiger Machinery, Inc., Grayslake, Ill.) having a ceramic chamber and using a high density and high purity yttria-stabilized zirconia microbeads of 0.6 mm in size at 3000 RPM for a single pass, the slurry produced had a pH of 3.70 measured at 23° C. This slurry now contains 45.22 wt. % solids, of which 40 wt. % being molecular sieve A, 12 wt. % Al2O3, and 48 wt. % clay. It was used for spray dry to produce a spray dried catalyst.
Spray dry of slurry of Example 1 was conducted using a Yamato DL-41 spray dryer (Yamato Scientific America, Orangeburg, N.Y.). An amount of 554.4 g of the slurry was spray dried. The spray dryer operated in a down spray mode using an atomization nozzle of 1 mm. The spray drying conditions are: feed rate: 40 g/min; inlet temperature: 350° C.; atomization pressure: 101.3 kPa-a; carrier gas (nitrogen) flow at 60% of full setting. Spray dry products were collected in a cyclone. They were calcined in a muffle furnace at 650° C. in air for 2 hours. The calcined samples were used for attrition and particle size analysis. Attrition resistance of the spray dry product was determined using a jet-cup attrition unit. The hourly fines generation as a result of attrition thus obtained is defined as ARI (Attrition Rate Index). A higher ARI means a higher attrition rate or a weaker product. The spray dried product derived from Example 1 gave an ARI of 0.69%/hr.
A slurry containing 44.85 wt. % solid was prepared according to this procedure: (A) adding 196.8 g of aluminum chlorohydrate MicroDry (ACH, from Reheis Inc., Berkeley Heights, N.J.) to 483.9 g of deionized water and mixed at 700 RPM for 10 minutes using a Yamato Model 2100 homogenizer (Yamato Scientific America Inc., Orangeburg, N.Y.) to give a solution having pH of 3.71 at 24.4° C.; (B) adding 660.3 g of the molecular sieve B to the solution from step (A) and mixed at 700 RPM for 10 minutes using the Yamato homogenizer Model 2100 used in step (A), the slurry thus obtained having a pH of 3.88 measured at 24.7° C.; (C) adding 459.1 g of ASP Ultrafine kaolin clay (Engelhard Corporation, Iselin, N.J.) while under mixing at 700 RPM using the Yamato Model 2100 homogenizer, the resulting slurry having a pH of 3.87 at 24.7° C.; (D) passing the slurry from step (C) through a bead mill, Eiger MINI bead mill model M250 (Eiger Machinery, Inc., Grayslake, Ill.) having a ceramic chamber and using a high density and high purity yttria-stabilized zirconia microbeads of 0.6 mm in size at 3000 RPM for a single pass, the slurry produced had a pH of 3.13 measured at 23° C. This slurry now contains 44.85 wt. % solids, of which 40 wt. % being molecular sieve B, 12 wt. % Al2O3, and 48 wt. % clay. It was used for spray dry to produce a spray dried catalyst.
Spray dry of slurry of Example-3 was conducted using a Yamato DL-41 spray dryer (Yamato Scientific America, Orangeburg, N.Y.). An amount of 450.5 g of the slurry was spray dried. The spray dryer operated in a down spray mode using an atomization nozzle of 1 mm. The spray drying conditions are: feed rate: 40 g/min; inlet temperature: 350° C.; atomization pressure: 101.3 kPa-a; carrier gas (nitrogen) flow at 60% of full setting. Spray dry products were collected in a cyclone. They were calcined in a muffle furnace at 650° C. in air for 2 hours. The calcined samples were used for attrition and particle size analysis. Attrition resistance of the spray dry product was determined using a jet-cup attrition unit. The hourly fines generation as a result of attrition thus obtained is defined as ARI (Attrition Rate Index). A higher ARI means a higher attrition rate or a weaker product. The spray dried product derived from Example 3 gave an ARI of 0.15%/hr.
A slurry containing 45 wt. % solid was prepared according to this procedure: (A) adding 201.4 g of aluminum chlorohydrate MicroDry (ACH, from Reheis Inc., Berkeley Heights, N.J.) to 744.6 g of deionized water and mixed at 700 RPM for 10 minutes using a Yamato Model 2100 homogenizer (Yamato Scientific America Inc., Orangeburg, N.Y.) to give a solution having pH of 3.94 at 16.1° C.; (B) adding 396 g of molecular sieve C to the solution from step (A) and mixed at 700 RPM for 10 minutes using the Yamato homogenizer Model 2100 used in step (A), the slurry thus obtained having a pH of 3.72 measured at 29.3° C.; (C) adding 458 g of ASP Ultrafine kaolin clay (Engelhard Corporation, Iselin, N.J.) while under mixing at 700 RPM using the Yamato Model 2100 homogenizer, the resulting slurry having a pH of 3.74 at 29° C.; (D) passing the slurry from step (C) through a bead mill, Eiger mini bead mill model M250 (Eiger Machinery, Inc., Grayslake, Ill.) having a ceramic chamber and using a high density and high purity yttria-stabilized zirconia microbeads of 0.6 mm in size at 3000 RPM for a single, the slurry produced had a pH of 3.77 measured at 23° C. This slurry now contains 45.01 wt. % solids, of which 60 wt. % being molecular sieve C, 12 wt. % Al2O3, and 48 wt. % clay. It was used for spray dry to produce a spray dried catalyst.
Spray dry of slurry of Example-5 was conducted using a Yamato DL-41 spray dryer (Yamato Scientific America, Orangeburg, N.Y.). An amount of 759.9 g of the slurry was spray dried. The spray dryer operated in a down spray mode using an atomization nozzle of 1 mm. The spray drying conditions are: feed rate: 40 g/min; inlet temperature: 350° C.; atomization pressure: 101.3 kPa-a; carrier gas (nitrogen) flow at 60% of full setting. Spray dry products were collected in a cyclone. They were calcined in a muffle furnace at 650° C. in air for 2 hours. The calcined samples were used for attrition and particle size analysis. Attrition resistance of the spray dry product was determined using a jet-cup attrition unit. The hourly fines generation as a result of attrition thus obtained is defined as ARI (Attrition Rate Index). A higher ARI means a higher attrition rate or a weaker product. The spray dried product derived from Example 5 gave an ARI of 0.25%/hr.
A slurry containing 45 wt. % solid was prepared according to this procedure: (A) adding 201.4 g of aluminum chlorohydrate MicroDry (ACH, from Reheis Inc., Berkeley Heights, N.J.) to 746.9 g of deionized water and mixed at 700 RPM for 10 minutes using a Yamato Model 2100 homogenizer (Yamato Scientific America Inc., Orangeburg, N.Y.) to give a solution having pH of 3.62 at 24° C.; (B) adding 393.7 g of molecular sieve D to the solution from step (A) and mixed at 700 RPM for 10 minutes using the Yamato homogenizer Model 2100 used in step (A), the slurry thus obtained having a pH of 3.54 measured at 26.6° C.; (C) adding 458 g of ASP Ultrafine kaolin clay (Engelhard Corporation, Iselin, N.J.) while under mixing at 700 RPM using the Yamato Model 2100 homogenizer, the resulting slurry having a pH of 3.64 at 25.3° C.; (D) passing the slurry from step (C) through a bead mill, Eiger mini bead mill model M250 (Eiger Machinery, Inc., Grayslake, Ill.) having a ceramic chamber and using a high density and high purity yttria-stabilized zirconia microbeads of 0.6 mm in size at 3000 RPM for a single, the slurry produced had a pH of 3.23 measured at 23° C. This slurry now contains 44.79 wt. % solids, of which 40 wt. % being molecular sieve D, 12 wt. % Al2O3, and 48 wt. % clay. It was used for spray dry to produce a spray dried catalyst.
Spray dry of slurry of Example-7 was conducted using a Yamato DL-41 spray dryer (Yamato Scientific America, Orangeburg, N.Y.). An amount of 626.1 g of the slurry was spray dried. The spray dryer operated in a down spray mode using an atomization nozzle of 1 mm. The spray drying conditions are: feed rate: 40 g/min; inlet temperature: 350° C.; atomization pressure: 101.3 kPa-a; carrier gas (nitrogen) flow at 60% of full setting. Spray dry products were collected in a cyclone. They were calcined in a muffle furnace at 650° C. in air for 2 hours. The calcined samples were used for attrition and particle size analysis. Attrition resistance of the spray dry product was determined using a jet-cup attrition unit. The hourly fines generation as a result of attrition thus obtained is defined as ARI (Attrition Rate Index). A higher ARI means a higher attrition rate or a weaker product. The spray dried product derived from Example 7 gave an ARI of 0.17%/hr.
A slurry containing 45 wt. % solid was prepared according to this procedure: (A) adding 89.8 g of aluminum chlorohydrate MicroDry (ACH, from Reheis Inc., Berkeley Heights, N.J.) to 328.6 g of deionized water and mixed at 700 RPM for 10 minutes using a Yamato Model 2100 homogenizer (Yamato Scientific America Inc., Orangeburg, N.Y.) to give a solution having pH of 4.19 at 18.3° C.; (B) adding 177.4 g of molecular sieve E to the solution from step (A) and mixed at 700 RPM for 10 minutes using the Yamato homogenizer Model 2100 used in step (A), the slurry thus obtained having a pH of 3.79 measured at 22.5° C.; (C) adding 204.2 g of ASP Ultrafine kaolin clay (Engelhard Corporation, Iselin, N.J.) while under mixing at 700 RPM using the Yamato Model 2100 homogenizer. The slurry became very thick, to further process, its solid content was reduced by 1% from 45% to 44%, the resulting slurry having a pH of 3.60 at 29.5° C.; (D) passing the slurry from step (C) through a bead mill, Eiger mini bead mill model M250 (Eiger Machinery, Inc., Grayslake, Ill.) having a ceramic chamber and using a high density and high purity yttria-stabilized zirconia microbeads of 0.6 mm in size at 3000 RPM for a single, the slurry produced had a pH of 3.39 measured at 23° C. This slurry now contains 43.74 wt. % solids, of which 40 wt. % being molecular sieve E, 12 wt. % Al2O3, and 48 wt. % clay. It was used for spray dry to produce a spray dried catalyst.
Spray dry of slurry of Example 9 was conducted using a Yamato DL-41 spray dryer (Yamato Scientific America, Orangeburg, N.Y.). An amount of 538.6 g of the slurry was spray dried. The spray dryer operated in a down spray mode using an atomization nozzle of 1 mm. The spray drying conditions are: feed rate: 40 g/min; inlet temperature: 350° C.; atomization pressure: 101.3° kPa-a; carrier gas (nitrogen) flow at 60% of full setting. Spray dry products were collected in a cyclone. They were calcined in a muffle furnace at 650° C. in air for 2 hours. The calcined samples were used for attrition and particle size analysis. Attrition resistance of the spray dry product was determined using a jet-cup attrition unit. The hourly fines generation as a result of attrition thus obtained is defined as ARI (Attrition Rate Index). A higher ARI means a higher attrition rate or a weaker product. The spray dried product derived from Example 9 gave an ARI of 1.24%/hr.
The ARI results of examples 1-10 were plotted in
Having now fully described this invention, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the invention can be performed within a wide range of parameters within what is claimed, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Vaughn, Stephen N., Chang, Yun-Feng, Mertens, Machteld Maria
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10737237, | Aug 12 2015 | UOP LLC | Composition and process for removing chlorides from a gaseous stream |
8884056, | Dec 14 2012 | UOP LLC | Anaerobic conversion of 4-carboxybenzaldehyde in ionic liquids |
9211530, | Dec 14 2012 | UOP LLC | Low silicon SAPO-42 and method of making |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4764269, | Jul 15 1985 | W R GRACE & CO -CONN , A CONN CORP ; W R GRACE & CO -CONN | Cracking catalyst |
6153552, | Oct 29 1997 | Exxon Chemical Patents INC | Methods for making catalysts |
6207872, | Dec 09 1997 | UOP LLC | Metallo aluminophosphate molecular sieve with cubic crystal morphology and methanol to olefin process using the sieve |
6303534, | May 26 1998 | ExxonMobil Chemical Patents INC | Silicoaluminophosphates having an AEL structure, and their preparation |
6334994, | Oct 09 1996 | Polymers Holding AS | Microporous crystalline silico-alumino-phosphate composition, catalytic material comprising said composition and use of these for production of olefins from methanol |
6534692, | Dec 09 1997 | UOP LLC | Methanol to olefin process with increased selectivity to ethylene and propylene |
6812372, | Mar 01 2001 | ExxonMobil Chemical Patents INC | Silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve |
6953767, | Mar 01 2001 | ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc. | Silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieve |
20040082825, | |||
20050009691, | |||
20070004950, | |||
WO2070407, | |||
WO3048084, | |||
WO2005063622, | |||
WO2005063623, | |||
WO9921651, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 10 2007 | CHANG, YUN-FENG | ExxonMobil Chemical Patents INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 018809 | /0845 | |
Jan 11 2007 | VAUGHN, STEPHEN N | ExxonMobil Chemical Patents INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 018809 | /0845 | |
Jan 12 2007 | ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jan 12 2007 | MERTENS, MACHTELD MARIA | ExxonMobil Chemical Patents INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 018809 | /0845 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 28 2014 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 16 2018 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jan 09 2023 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jun 26 2023 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
May 24 2014 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Nov 24 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 24 2015 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
May 24 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
May 24 2018 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Nov 24 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 24 2019 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
May 24 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
May 24 2022 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Nov 24 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 24 2023 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
May 24 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |