A semiconductor apparatus has a light-receiving element. The light-receiving element has a photodiode unit having a shield film for removing noise, at least two test pads, and a shield film pseudo pattern which is formed by the same membranous type as the shield film and connected to the two test pads. The photodiode unit and the shield film pseudo pattern are integrated in one semiconductor chip. A resistance value of the shield film pseudo pattern is measured using the test pads connected to the shield film pseudo pattern. CMR of a photocoupler can be evaluated according to the correlation relationship between the measurement result and the sheet resistance of the shield film.
|
1. A semiconductor apparatus comprising:
a photodiode unit having a shield film that removes electric noise;
at least two test pads; and
a shield film pseudo pattern, spaced apart from the photodiode lode unit, formed by a same membranous type as the shield film, the shield film pseudo pattern being connected to the two test pads,
wherein the photodiode unit and the shield film pseudo pattern are integrated in one semiconductor chip.
2. The semiconductor apparatus according to
3. The semiconductor apparatus according to
wherein the shield film pseudo pattern has a same pattern of a sheet resistance as the shield film included in the photodiode unit.
4. The semiconductor apparatus according to
wherein the shield film pseudo pattern has a same pattern of a sheet resistance as the shield film included in the photodiode unit.
5. The semiconductor apparatus according to
6. The semiconductor apparatus according to
7. The semiconductor apparatus according to
8. The semiconductor apparatus according to
9. A method of inspecting the semiconductor apparatus of
measuring a correlation relationship between a sheet resistance of the shield film and a common mode rejection beforehand;
measuring a resistance value of the shield film pseudo pattern; and
evaluating a common mode rejection of a photocoupler using the measured resistance value and the correlation relationship.
10. The method according to
11. The method according to
wherein the shield film pseudo pattern has a same pattern of a sheet resistance as the shield film included in the photodiode unit.
12. The method according to
13. The method according to
a voltage is applied from another test pad to the semiconductor apparatus.
14. The method according to
a voltage is applied from another test pad to the semiconductor apparatus.
15. The method according to
a voltage is applied from another test pad to the semiconductor apparatus.
16. The method according to
a voltage is applied from another test pad to the semiconductor apparatus.
17. The semiconductor apparatus according to
18. The semiconductor apparatus according to
a shield film;
an aluminum film disposed above the shield film; and
a via hole connecting the shield film to the aluminum film.
19. The semiconductor apparatus according to
a shield film;
a plurality of aluminum films disposed above the shield film; and
a plurality of via holes connecting the shield film to the aluminum films.
20. The semiconductor apparatus according to
|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a semiconductor apparatus and a method for inspection thereof, and particularly to a light-receiving element having a photodiode unit and a method for inspecting a common mode rejection thereof.
2. Description of Related Art
In a photocoupler, a light-emitting element and a light-receiving element are disposed to oppose each other. Usually, a photocoupler has a function to electrically insulates two circuits with different potentials and transmit a signal via light. On the other hand, a photocoupler can be considered as a capacitor which uses the light-emitting and light-receiving sides as electrodes. Therefore, the photocoupler has a stray capacitance Cf between the light-emitting side and the light-receiving side. If a rapidly changing voltage (noise) dv/dt is applied between an input and an output of the photocoupler, a displacement current (I=Cf·dv/dt) flows, thereby generating noise (hereinafter referred to as “electric noise” as appropriate) in the output of the photocoupler. This noise causes malfunction. As one of the indices to indicate the capability to maintain a correct output state, the Common Mode Rejection (CMR) is used. The higher the CMR, the noise resistance is evaluated to be higher. If a steep voltage is applied between the input and output depending on the user environment, a photocoupler of high CMR needs to be selected.
The mechanism to remove noise by the shield film is explained hereinafter.
As mentioned above, CMR is used as one of the indices to show the capability to maintain the correct output state, which is the capability to remove noise that causes the malfunction. As shown in
CMR of a photocoupler is generally required to be 10 kV/μs or more. Thus a pulse of 10 kV/μs or more must be applied to measure the CMR. CMR cannot be measured by a normal electrical properties evaluation equipment in an assembly line, and a special simple measuring device as shown in
The measuring method is that a photocoupler is mounted to a test board 61, a pulse is applied by a high-pressure equipment 62 while checking an oscilloscope 63 so as to check a change in the output waveform. However, for each of the photocoupler, this method requires tasks of mounting the photocoupler to the test board 61, applying a pulse, checking waveform, and demounting. Accordingly, this method takes time. Therefore, it is difficult to evaluate all photocouplers and necessary to manually check by sample. A dedicated automatic evaluation equipment can be implemented but it will be a large business investment.
As described so far, a photocoupler has a stray capacitance between the light-emitting and light-receiving side. Thus malfunctions caused by noise must be prevented. The quality of the photocoupler can be indicated by showing the capability to remove noise using the CMR properties. However, as a predetermined voltage is required to measure CMR of a photocoupler, it is difficult and also costly. Therefore, only a limited number of products can be measured.
As mentioned above, the present inventor has found a problem that it is difficult to measure all the CMR properties of a photocoupler.
An exemplary aspect of an embodiment of the present invention is a semiconductor apparatus that includes a light-receiving element. The light-receiving element includes a photodiode unit having a shield film that removes electric noise, at least two test pads, and a shield film pseudo pattern formed by a same membranous type as the shield film and connected to the two test pads. A resistance value of the shield film pseudo pattern is measured using the test pads connected to the shield film pseudo pattern. CMR of a photocoupler can be measured according to the correlation relationship between the measurement result and the sheet resistance of the shield film.
Another exemplary aspect of an embodiment of the present invention is a chip of a light-receiving element that includes a photodiode unit having a shield film for removing electric noise, at least two test pads, and a shield film pseudo pattern formed by a same membranous type as the shield film and connected to the two test pads.
Another exemplary aspect of an embodiment of the present invention is a method of inspecting the abovementioned semiconductor apparatus that includes measuring the resistance value of the shield film pseudo pattern and evaluating a common mode rejection according to the measured resistance value.
The present invention facilitates CMR measurement of a photocoupler.
The above and other exemplary aspects, advantages and features will be more apparent from the following description of certain exemplary embodiments taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Hereafter, an embodiment of the present invention is described with reference to the drawings. For clarity's sake, the following description and drawings are omitted and simplified as appropriate. In the drawings, components and corresponding sections having identical configurations or functions are denoted by reference numerals with detailed description omitted.
In this document, if there are multiple same components and if they need to be differentiated from each other, they are appended by the code of “−n” (n is an integer more than 1). For example,
The PD unit 11 may only be the configuration to remove noise by the shield film. For example, the PD unit 11 may have the cross-section configuration of
The shield film pseudo pattern 14 is formed by the same membranous film as the shield film used for the PD unit 11, and is electrically connected with the two different test pads 13. The shield film pseudo pattern 14 is minimized and placed in the free space. In
The resistance values of the shield film and the shield film pseudo pattern 14 of the PD unit 11 are proportional to each other according to the size of the shield film. The resistance value of the shield film pseudo pattern 14 can be measured by an electrical property evaluation equipment used in manufacturing process. The photocoupler is required of the quality having CMR more than a predetermined value. Therefore if the relationship between the shield film sheet resistance and CMR can be obtained in advance, CMR of the shield film formed in the PD unit 11 can be estimated according to the resistance value of the shield film pseudo pattern. From the above explanation, the method of calculating CMR of a photocoupler is explained hereinafter.
As explained above, CMR can alternatively be measured by measuring the resistance value using the shield film pseudo pattern 14. Therefore, the shield film pseudo pattern 14 is formed by the same process as the shield film of the PD unit 11 and in the same layer as the shield film of the PD unit 11. Specifically, same kind of the shield film as the shield film placed in the PD unit 11 is formed along with a pattern such as a GND connection etc. and electrical connections concerning the shield film. It is preferred to form a pattern in a range that the resistance value of the shield film pseudo pattern 14 can be correctly measured.
For example, in a cross-sectional diagram of
More specifically, if the GND connection of the shield film is made by raised by a VIA hole, it is preferable to develop the cross-sectional structure thereof also to the pseudo pattern.
Thus, in this embodiment, the correlation between the shield film formed in the PD unit 11 and CMR is obtained beforehand. Further, the shield film formed in the PD unit 11 is formed in the same process as the shield film pseudo patterns 14 and 14b. Both ends of the shield film pseudo patterns 14 and 14b are connected to the test pads 13. By using the same kind of film as the shield film of the PD unit 11 for the shield film pseudo patterns 14 and 14b, the shield film pseudo patterns 14 and 14b, which are correlated with CMR, are provided to each chip. The resistance value between the test pads 13 is measured using the electrical properties evaluation equipment of a related art. This enables to measure all the CMR by the electrical properties evaluation equipment before shipment. Moreover, there is another effect expected that anomalies associated with the shield film can be detected.
As described above, the present invention enables to measure CMR properties of all the products without new investment and more man-hour. The following effects are can be expected. For example, it is desirable to pull out the test pads from the both ends of the shield film that covers the upper part of the PD unit and directly measure the CMR properties by the electrical property evaluation equipment. However, by forming the shield film pseudo pattern, which is a minimized shield film, the shield film pseudo pattern can be placed in the free space. As the free space of the chip is utilized in this way, it is possible to evaluate CMR without increasing the chip size. More specifically, it can be realized by a smaller chip size as compared to the case of pulling out the test pads from the shield film of the PD unit. Further, by forming the shield film pseudo pattern, it is possible to find other anomalies associated with the shield film by the test pads, not only CMR, as described above.
While the invention has been described in terms of several exemplary embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with various modifications within the spirit and scope of the appended claims and the invention is not limited to the examples described above.
Further, the scope of the claims is not limited by the exemplary embodiments described above.
Furthermore, it is noted that, Applicant's intent is to encompass equivalents of all claim elements, even if amended later during prosecution.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
9379272, | Sep 13 2013 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Light receiving element and optically coupled insulating device |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6184521, | Jan 06 1998 | JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association | Photodiode detector with integrated noise shielding |
JP4354379, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jun 30 2009 | MATSUMAE, TOMOHIKO | NEC Electronics Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022970 | /0695 | |
Jul 08 2009 | Renesas Electronics Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Apr 01 2010 | NEC Electronics Corporation | Renesas Electronics Corporation | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 025193 | /0165 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
May 03 2013 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
May 01 2015 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Sep 20 2015 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 20 2014 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 20 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 20 2015 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 20 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 20 2018 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 20 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 20 2019 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 20 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 20 2022 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 20 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 20 2023 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 20 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |