neural stimulation device with improved power consumption and/or effectiveness. The device is configured to recognize proposed stimuli which will be masked by earlier or simultaneous stimuli. Such masked stimuli are either deleted, or replaced by another stimuli.
|
8. A neural stimulation system, comprising:
means for determining a stimulus set comprising electrical stimuli;
processing means for analyzing said stimulus set to determine if any of said stimuli are likely to be masked upon delivery of the set to the recipient;
means for deleting at least one of said likely masked stimuli; and
means for presenting the stimulus set to the recipient.
1. A neural stimulator device for electrically stimulating a recipient, comprising:
a stimulus generation device configured to determine a stimulus set of electrical stimuli;
a processor configured to analyze said stimulus set to determine if any of said stimuli are likely to be masked upon delivery of the stimulus set to the recipient, and to delete one or more of said stimuli likely to be masked; and
an electrode array configured to deliver the stimulus set to the recipient.
16. A neural stimulator device for electrically stimulating a recipient, comprising:
a stimulus generation device configured to determine a stimulus set comprising one or more electrical stimuli;
a processor configured to analyze said stimulus set to determine if any of said one or more stimuli are likely to be masked upon delivery of the set to the recipient, and to delete at least one of said one or more stimuli in said stimulus set if masking effects are detected; and
an electrode array configured to deliver the stimulus set to the recipient.
2. The device of
3. The device of
4. The device of
5. The device of
6. The device of
7. The device of
9. The system of
means for adding at least one alternative stimuli to said stimulus if likely masked stimuli are deleted.
10. The system of
means for deleting at least one stimuli configured to be presented via a first electrode; and
means for adding a new stimuli corresponding to the deleted stimuli for presentation via a second electrode.
11. The system of
means for utilizing a look-up table to determine if any of said stimuli are likely to be masked.
12. The system of
means for utilizing a theoretical masking model to determine if any of said stimuli are likely to be masked.
13. The system of
means for determining a plurality of stimulus sets each comprising electrical stimuli.
14. The system of
means for analyzing a selected stimulus set with a previously determined stimulus set to determine if any of said stimuli are likely to be masked.
15. The system of
means for analyzing said plurality of stimuli in said determined stimulus set in relation to one another to determine if any of said plurality of stimuli are likely to be masked.
17. The device of
18. The device of
19. The device of
20. The device of
21. The device of
22. The device of
|
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/343,397, filed Feb. 21, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,272,446 which was a National Stage application of International Application PCT/AU01/01032, filed Aug. 21, 2001, and which claims the benefit of Australian Patent Application PQ 9528, filed Aug. 21, 2000, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
The present invention relates to devices and methods for neural stimulation, and particularly but not exclusively to auditory prostheses.
Wearable medical devices reliant upon stored power share a common dynamic. As the possible and desired functionality of the devices is improved, the power demands generally also increase. As a result, the life per charge or per cell is reduced, which has not only a cost impact for the user, but also increases the risk that a device will power down at an inconvenient time.
In the field of cochlear implants, this issue is exacerbated by the trend to a single, behind the ear unit to replace what was once a head mounted unit and a separate speech processor unit worn on the body. The available volume and weight for the power cell is accordingly reduced. Increased power demands to provide improved functionality create a need to consider the efficiency of speech processing schemes and stimulus sets in order to provide maximum battery life.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved processing method and device, in order to a better balance of power consumption and performance in neural stimulation systems, particularly auditory prostheses.
The present invention provides, broadly, for a scheme in which masking effects are taken into account when determining which stimuli are actually delivered to a patient. This may be implemented in various ways. In one approach, after a set of stimulus instructions is generated, the set is checked against a look-up table. This table contains combinations of stimuli which have previously been clinically determined for that patent to display a masking effect. The second stimulus is deleted in this case.
In another approach, a theoretical model of masking could be used in addition to or instead of a look up table.
According to one aspect, the present invention relates to a method of neural stimulation of the type in which successive stimuli are presented on an electrode array having one or more electrodes, said stimuli being generated by a stimulus generation device, the method including the steps of:
According to another aspect, the present invention provides a neural stimulator device, including a stimulus generation device for generating stimulus sets for one or more periods, said stimulus sets being intended for delivery at an electrode array for operatively presenting stimuli to neural structures,
wherein said device further includes processing means implementing a predetermined instruction set, said processing means analysing each stimulus set using said predetermined instruction set in order to locate factors indicative of a likely masking effect, and if it is determined that a masking effect is likely, altering said stimulus set.
The stimulus set may include a single stimulus in which case only the variable parameters relevant to that type of stimulation need to be specified. In suitable devices, this may include the timing, waveform, frequency, current, voltage, phase, amplitude and electrode location or further factors as required. The instruction set in this case preferably will consider the stimuli previously delivered in determining whether a masking effect is likely.
Alternatively, the stimulus set may include multiple stimuli, with variables as discussed above. If this case, in addition to or instead of previous stimulus sets, the instruction set will preferably analyse the various stimuli in relation to each other.
The stimulus generation device may be unitary or be made of physically distinct parts. For example, in the case of a cochlear implant, it may include both an external speech processor and an implanted device, only the speech processor, or only an implanted device, depending upon the desired location of processing capacity. The instruction set may be implanted as a separate procedure, or integrated within the processor which generates the stimulus set.
In a preferred form, if analysis indicates a likelihood of masking, the masked stimulus is simply omitted. However, in a system such as a cochlear implant, where stimuli are presented on multiple electrodes, an alternative stimuli—for example, on a different electrode—may be substituted. For example, the next most significant sound channel may be selected as the basis for stimulation.
In the case of the intra-cochlear implant, it has been observed that certain stimuli, when delivered simultaneously or in close succession, do not produce a patient percept significantly different from when only the first stimulus is delivered. For example, consider a conventional, multi-electrode intra-cochlear electrode array. If a large amplitude stimulus is delivered at one electrode, and simultaneously a smaller amplitude stimulus is delivered at the next electrode, then in many cases the user will not be able to perceive whether or not the smaller stimulus was delivered—it is said to be masked by the large stimulus. Other circumstances may give rise to masking of various neural percepts. Masking phenomena have been discussed in the technical literature.
The present invention arises from a recognition that masking effects can be considered as indicating a waste of stimulation power, as although the stimulus is presented to the patient, the patient does not receive any increased perception as a result of the stimulus. Accordingly, a proportion of the stimulus energy is simply wasted.
An implementation of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:
The present invention will be described with particular reference to a speech processor unit for a cochlear implant system. However, it will be appreciated that the present invention has application to other neural stimulation systems where the masking phenomenon may be relevant.
Referring to
The implanted component 5 includes a receiver coil 6 for receiving power and data from coil 3. A cable 7 extends from the implanted device 5 to the cochlea 12 and terminates in an electrode array 10. The signals thus received are applied by the array 10 to the basilar membrane 8 thereby stimulating the auditory nerve. The operation of the device shown in
Thus, the RF link, which is in turn powered by the speech processor 1, provides power and data to the implanted device 6. The speech processor also processes sound signals received by microphone 2, so as to send appropriate instructions for stimulation to the implanted device 6. The precise details of speech processing are not necessary for an understanding of the present invention, and are in any case well understood by those skilled in the art. Any suitable speech processing strategy could be used in conjunction with the present invention.
The block diagram of
Sound signals are detected by microphone 20, and processed into a predetermined number of frequency channels by filter 21. The output of filter 21 is a set of signal amplitudes per channel 22. Processor 23, in simple terms, selects certain channels as the basis for stimulation, based on amplitude or other factors. A set of stimulation instructions for implanted receiver stimulator unit 28 is thereby produced.
These instructions include at least the electrode or electrodes to be stimulated, and the amplitude of the stimulus to be applied. The process so far is conventional.
Masking check involves comparing each successive two or more stimuli with the look-up table to determine whether they match a predetermined masking rule in look-up table 26.
The table below sets out a set of minimum unmasked level—that is, for one electrode n, the level which will not be masked, as a function of the stimulus levels which have been applied to the other electrodes within the previous 2m5. The electrode column lists the electrodes in an array of n max electrodes. Each entry M gives the minimum stimulus level (amplitude) to electrode n which will elicit a response immediately following a stimulus to the relevant electrodes, expressed as values between threshold (T) and maximum comfortable (c) levels. It will be appreciated that T and C levels are routinely determined during set up of a speech processor.
Minimum Unmasked Level
Electrode
1
M1, T M1, T+1 - - - M1, c−1 M1, C
2
|
|
n − 1
Mn−1, T Mn−1, T+1 - - - Mn−1, C
n − 1
|
|
|
|
N max
The masking check output is thus the stimulation set, with masked stimuli excluded. This is then transmitted conventionally, for example via an RF link to the implanted receiver/stimulator unit, which operates conventionally.
Variations and additions will be apparent to those skilled in the art with the broad scope of the present invention.
Parker, John, Patrick, James F.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
9008786, | Aug 21 2000 | Cochlear Limited | Determining stimulation signals for neural stimulation |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4441202, | May 28 1979 | The University of Melbourne | Speech processor |
4515158, | Dec 12 1980 | The Commonwealth of Australia Secretary of Industry and Commerce | Speech processing method and apparatus |
4532930, | Apr 11 1983 | Commonwealth of Australia, Dept. of Science & Technology | Cochlear implant system for an auditory prosthesis |
4611596, | Oct 14 1980 | Purdue Research Foundation | Sensory prostheses |
4847617, | Aug 14 1987 | Pacesetter, Inc | High speed digital telemetry system for implantable devices |
5046242, | Jul 27 1982 | Commonwealth of Australia | Method of making feedthrough assemblies having hermetic seals between electrical feedthrough elements and ceramic carriers therefor |
5271397, | Sep 08 1989 | Cochlear Limited | Multi-peak speech processor |
5274711, | Nov 14 1989 | Apparatus and method for modifying a speech waveform to compensate for recruitment of loudness | |
5403262, | Mar 09 1993 | XOMED SURGICAL PRODUCTS, INC | Minimum energy tinnitus masker |
5412748, | Dec 04 1992 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Optical semiconductor module |
5601617, | Apr 26 1995 | Advanced Bionics AG | Multichannel cochlear prosthesis with flexible control of stimulus waveforms |
5609616, | Sep 22 1989 | ALFRED E MANN FOUNDATION FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH | Physician's testing system and method for testing implantable cochlear stimulator |
5626629, | May 31 1995 | Advanced Bionics AG | Programming of a speech processor for an implantable cochlear stimulator |
5649970, | Aug 18 1995 | Advanced Bionics AG | Edge-effect electrodes for inducing spatially controlled distributions of electrical potentials in volume conductive media |
5653742, | Sep 20 1995 | Cochlear Pty. Ltd. | Use of bioresorbable polymers in cochlear implants and other implantable devices |
5687282, | Jan 09 1995 | Pendragon Wireless LLC | Method and apparatus for determining a masked threshold |
5776179, | Oct 06 1995 | The University of Michigan | Method for evaluating inner ear hearing loss |
5786439, | Oct 24 1996 | MINIMED INC | Hydrophilic, swellable coatings for biosensors |
5824022, | Feb 28 1997 | Advanced Bionics AG | Cochlear stimulation system employing behind-the-ear speech processor with remote control |
5833714, | Jan 15 1997 | Advanced Bionics, LLC | Cochlear electrode array employing tantalum metal |
5853424, | Mar 13 1996 | Medtronic, Inc | Method of and apparatus for preventing tissue ingrowth in infusion catheters |
5895416, | Mar 12 1997 | Medtronic, Inc | Method and apparatus for controlling and steering an electric field |
5909497, | Oct 10 1996 | Programmable hearing aid instrument and programming method thereof | |
6115478, | Apr 16 1997 | K S HIMPP | Apparatus for and method of programming a digital hearing aid |
6116413, | Jan 23 1998 | Cochlear Limited | Coating for bioelectrical stimulation and recording electrodes |
6198971, | Apr 08 1999 | Cochlear Limited | Implantable system for rehabilitation of a hearing disorder |
6230057, | Jun 06 1995 | PIXIUM VISION SA | Multi-phasic microphotodiode retinal implant and adaptive imaging retinal stimulation system |
6304786, | Mar 29 1999 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Implantable lead with dissolvable coating for improved fixation and extraction |
6304787, | Aug 26 1998 | Advanced Bionics AG | Cochlear electrode array having current-focusing and tissue-treating features |
6321126, | Dec 07 1998 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Implantable connector |
6334072, | Apr 01 1999 | Cochlear Limited | Fully implantable hearing system with telemetric sensor testing |
6354299, | Oct 27 1997 | NEUROPACE, INC , A DELAWARE CORPORATION | Implantable device for patient communication |
6366863, | Jan 09 1998 | Starkey Laboratories, Inc | Portable hearing-related analysis system |
6421569, | May 21 1999 | Cochlear Limited | Cochlear implant electrode array |
6463328, | Feb 02 1996 | Adaptive brain stimulation method and system | |
6497729, | Nov 20 1998 | Connecticut, University of | Implant coating for control of tissue/implant interactions |
6537200, | Mar 28 2000 | Cochlear Limited | Partially or fully implantable hearing system |
6565503, | Apr 13 2000 | Cochlear Limited | At least partially implantable system for rehabilitation of hearing disorder |
6575894, | Apr 13 2000 | Cochlear Limited | At least partially implantable system for rehabilitation of a hearing disorder |
6594525, | Aug 26 1999 | MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERATE GES M B H | Electrical nerve stimulation based on channel specific sampling sequences |
6697674, | Apr 13 2000 | Cochlear Limited | At least partially implantable system for rehabilitation of a hearing disorder |
6751505, | Mar 03 1999 | Cochlear Limited | Method and apparatus for optimizing the operation of a cochlear implant prosthesis |
6778040, | Jul 17 2002 | Feed-through filter having improved shielding and mounting functions | |
6778858, | Sep 16 1999 | Advanced Bionics AG | Cochlear implant |
6879693, | Feb 26 2002 | Cochlear Limited | Method and system for external assessment of hearing aids that include implanted actuators |
6916291, | Feb 07 2001 | DIAGNOSTIC HEARING ASSESSMENT LLC | Systems, methods and products for diagnostic hearing assessments distributed via the use of a computer network |
7171272, | Aug 21 2000 | UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE, THE | Sound-processing strategy for cochlear implants |
7181297, | Sep 28 1999 | K S HIMPP | System and method for delivering customized audio data |
7218971, | Mar 29 1999 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Implantable lead with dissolvable coating for improved fixation and extraction |
7251530, | Dec 11 2002 | Advanced Bionics AG | Optimizing pitch and other speech stimuli allocation in a cochlear implant |
7272446, | Aug 21 2000 | Cochlear Limited | Power efficient electrical stimulation |
7317944, | Jul 08 2003 | Advanced Bionics AG | System and method for using a multi-contact electrode to stimulate the cochlear nerve or other body tissue |
7328151, | Mar 22 2002 | K S HIMPP | Audio decoder with dynamic adjustment of signal modification |
7822478, | Aug 21 2001 | Cochlear Limited | Compressed neural coding |
20010050837, | |||
20020176584, | |||
20030109903, | |||
20030199950, | |||
20030233133, | |||
20040098063, | |||
20040127968, | |||
20040147992, | |||
20060004432, | |||
20070127745, | |||
20090204177, | |||
20090292161, | |||
AU2005202733, | |||
EP124930, | |||
EP247649, | |||
EP282336, | |||
JP10508442, | |||
JP11513539, | |||
JP2000509566, | |||
JP61001200, | |||
JP63242252, | |||
JP8501241, | |||
WO103622, | |||
WO119304, | |||
WO199470, | |||
WO9324176, | |||
WO9501709, | |||
WO9612383, | |||
WO9709863, | |||
WO9743871, | |||
WO9748447, | |||
WO9965276, | |||
WO217679, | |||
WO9626673, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Sep 18 2007 | Cochlear Limited | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Nov 12 2007 | PARKER, JOHN | Cochlear Limited | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 020331 | /0201 | |
Nov 19 2007 | PATRICK, JAMES F | Cochlear Limited | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 020331 | /0201 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 15 2015 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Apr 18 2019 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 19 2023 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Dec 04 2023 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Nov 01 2014 | 4 years fee payment window open |
May 01 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 01 2015 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Nov 01 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Nov 01 2018 | 8 years fee payment window open |
May 01 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 01 2019 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Nov 01 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Nov 01 2022 | 12 years fee payment window open |
May 01 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 01 2023 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Nov 01 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |