A process for stripping gases from catalyst material in which catalyst travels down baffles at a first acute angle and then at a second acute angle on the same baffle. Traveling down the baffle at the second angle assures the catalyst will cross a downcomer channel and land on an adjacent baffle.
|
11. A process for the stripping of entrained and/or adsorbed hydrocarbons from catalyst particles, said process comprising:
contacting catalyst particles with a hydrocarbon stream;
disengaging hydrocarbons from the catalyst particles after contact with said hydrocarbon stream to produce a stream of spent catalyst particles containing entrained and/or adsorbed hydrocarbons;
passing the spent catalyst particles downwardly over a pair of baffles defining a downcomer channel therebetween;
at least some of the spent catalyst particles traveling down a first face of a first baffle and then traveling down a second face of said first baffle at an acute angle with respect to vertical, said second face extending toward said downcomer channel into a vertical projection of a second baffle;
recovering stripping fluid and stripped hydrocarbons from the baffles; and
recovering stripped catalyst particles from said baffles.
1. A process for the stripping of entrained and/or adsorbed hydrocarbons from catalyst particles, said process comprising:
contacting catalyst particles with a hydrocarbon stream;
disengaging hydrocarbons from the catalyst particles after contact with said hydrocarbon stream to produce a stream of spent catalyst particles containing entrained and/or adsorbed hydrocarbons;
passing the spent catalyst particles downwardly over a plurality of baffles;
at least some of the spent catalyst particles traveling down a first face and a projecting edge of a first baffle at a first acute angle with respect to vertical and then traveling down a second face of said first baffle at a second acute angle with respect to vertical, said second face having a secured edge secured to said projecting edge of said first face and said second acute angle being different from the first acute angle;
recovering stripping fluid and stripped hydrocarbons from the baffles; and
recovering stripped catalyst particles from said baffles.
6. A process for the stripping of entrained and/or adsorbed hydrocarbons from catalyst particles, wherein the entrained and/or adsorbed hydrocarbons are from the fluid catalytic cracking (fcc) of an fcc feed with a particulate material comprising an fcc catalyst, said process comprising:
contacting an fcc feed with fcc catalyst to provide a mixture of fcc catalyst and fcc feed and to convert the fcc feed while depositing coke on the fcc catalyst;
separating converted fcc feed from the fcc catalyst to produce a stream of separated catalyst particles containing hydrocarbons;
passing the separated catalyst particle stream into a stripping vessel and passing the stream of catalyst particles downwardly over a plurality of baffles in the stripping vessel, at least some of the separated catalyst particles traveling down a first face and a projecting edge of a first baffle at a first acute angle with respect to vertical and then traveling down a second face of said first baffle at a second acute angle with respect to vertical, said second face having a secured edge secured to said projecting edge of said first face and said second acute angle being different from the first acute angle;
discharging a stripping fluid upwardly through a plurality of openings in said baffles;
recovering stripping fluid and stripped hydrocarbons that pass upwardly from the baffles;
recovering stripped fcc catalyst passing downwardly from the baffles;
passing stripped fcc catalyst to a regeneration vessel to remove coke from the fcc catalyst; and
returning fcc catalyst from the regeneration vessel for contact with the fcc feed.
3. The process of
8. The process of
12. The process of
13. The process of
16. The process of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This invention relates to processes for the fluidized contacting of catalyst with hydrocarbons. More specifically, this invention relates to processes for stripping entrained or adsorbed hydrocarbons from catalyst particles.
A variety of processes contact finely divided particulate material with a hydrocarbon containing feed under conditions wherein a fluid maintains the particles in a fluidized condition to effect transport of the solid particles to different stages of the process. Fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) is a prime example of such a process that contacts hydrocarbons in a reaction zone with a catalyst composed of finely divided particulate material. The hydrocarbon feed and inert diluent such as steam fluidize the catalyst and typically transports it in a riser as the catalyst promotes the cracking reaction. As the cracking reaction proceeds, substantial amounts of hydrocarbon, called coke, are deposited on the catalyst. A high temperature regeneration within a regeneration zone burns coke from the catalyst by contact with an oxygen-containing stream that again serves as a fluidization medium. Coke-containing catalyst, referred to herein as spent catalyst, is continually removed from the reaction zone and replaced by essentially coke-free catalyst from the regeneration zone.
A majority of the hydrocarbon vapors that contact the catalyst in the reaction zone are separated from the solid particles by ballistic and/or centrifugal separation methods within the reaction zone. However, the catalyst particles employed in an FCC process have a large surface area, which is due to a great multitude of pores located in the particles. As a result, the catalytic materials retain hydrocarbons within their pores, upon the external surface of the catalyst and in the spaces between individual catalyst particles. Although the quantity of hydrocarbons retained on each individual catalyst particle is very small, the large amount of catalyst and the high catalyst circulation rate which is typically used in a modern FCC unit results in a significant quantity of hydrocarbons being withdrawn from the reaction zone with the catalyst.
Therefore, it is common practice to remove, or strip, hydrocarbons from spent catalyst prior to passing it into the regeneration zone. Improved stripping brings economic benefits to the FCC process by reducing “delta coke”. Delta coke is the weight percent coke on spent catalyst less the weight percent coke on regenerated catalyst. Reducing delta coke in the FCC process permits a lowering of the regenerator temperature. Consequently, more of the resulting, relatively cooler regenerated catalyst is required to supply the fixed heat load in the reaction zone. The reaction zone may therefore operate at a higher catalyst-to-feed or catalyst-to-oil (C/O) ratio. The higher C/O ratio increases conversion which increases the production of valuable products. Accordingly, improved stripping results in improved conversion. Additionally, stripping hydrocarbons from the catalyst also allows recovery of the hydrocarbons as products.
The most common method of stripping the catalyst involves passing a stripping gas, usually steam, through a flowing stream of catalyst, counter-current to its direction of flow. Such steam stripping operations, with varying degrees of efficiency, remove the hydrocarbon vapors which are entrained with the catalyst and adsorbed on the catalyst. Contact of the catalyst with a stripping medium may be accomplished in a simple open vessel as demonstrated by U.S. Pat. No. 4,481,103.
The efficiency of catalyst stripping is increased by using vertically spaced baffles to cascade the catalyst from side to side as it moves down a stripping apparatus and counter-currently contacts a stripping medium. Moving the catalyst horizontally increases contact between the catalyst and the stripping medium across the active fluidized surfaces of the trays so that more hydrocarbons are removed from the catalyst. In these arrangements, the catalyst is given a labyrinthine path through a series of baffles located at different levels. Catalyst and gas contact is increased by this arrangement that leaves no open vertical path of significant cross-section through the stripping apparatus. Further examples of these stripping devices for FCC units are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 2,440,620; U.S. Pat. No. 2,612,438; U.S. Pat. No. 3,894,932; U.S. Pat. No. 4,414,100 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,364,905. These references show the typical stripping vessel arrangement having a stripping vessel, a series of outer baffles in the form of frusto-conical sections that direct the catalyst inwardly onto a series of inner baffles. The inner baffles are centrally located conical or frusto-conical sections that divert the catalyst outwardly onto the outer baffles. The stripping medium enters from below the lower baffles and continues rising upwardly from the bottom of one baffle to the bottom of the next succeeding baffle. The baffle design typically contains steam jet nozzles on the top baffle and drilled holes on the remaining lower baffles to distribute the steam across the annulus between baffles to help ensure complete circumferential distribution of steam and to achieve maximum contact of steam with the catalyst. The outer diameter of the inner baffles are typically made smaller than the inner diameter of the outer baffles to facilitate construction. Variations in the baffles include the addition of skirts about the trailing edge of the baffle as depicted in U.S. Pat. No. 2,994,659 and the use of multiple linear baffle sections at different baffle levels as demonstrated in FIG. 3 of U.S. Pat. No. 4,500,423. A variation in introducing the stripping medium is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 2,541,801 where a quantity of fluidizing gas is admitted at a number of discrete locations. Baffles can also include an upstanding weir on the edge of the baffle adjacent the downcomer.
Accordingly, it is desirable to increase the efficiency of stripping in a baffle style stripping vessel by ensuring catalyst encounters all baffles in the stripping vessel.
We have observed that catalyst can bypass baffles or portions of baffles in an FCC stripper vessels. Bypassing can occur when stripping fluid ascends along opposed walls of the stripping vessel while catalyst stays toward the middle between the opposed walls. The catalyst thus does not spread out on the baffles and is contacted with less stripping fluid diminishing stripping efficiency. This phenomenon is more prevalent in a larger stripping vessel because there is a greater distance between baffles and a greater horizontal distance across each baffle that the catalyst must traverse. The bypassing phenomenon may also be encountered when operating with lower catalyst flux due to insufficient momentum for cascading the catalyst stream from side to side. To prevent this bypassing we have invented a baffle with two faces. The second face extends into the downcomer channel between paired baffles. The second face directs the falling catalyst toward an adjacent baffle on the other side of the stripping vessel. The lower face facilitates transverse movement relative to the adjacent baffle to prevent baffle bypassing and increasing efficiency. Yet another advantage resulting from avoiding baffle bypassing is provision of a more uniform and higher bed density in the stripping vessel, which is particularly important to provide an adequate differential pressure across the slide valve in a conduit for transporting catalyst particles to a regenerator vessel.
Additional objects, embodiments, and details of this invention are given in the following detailed description of the invention.
The present invention will be described in the context of an FCC unit. However, other contexts may be applicable.
A conventional FCC feedstock or higher boiling hydrocarbon feedstock are suitable feeds. The most common of such conventional feedstocks is a “vacuum gas oil” (VGO), which is typically a hydrocarbon material having a boiling range of from 343 to 552° C. (649 to 1026° F.) prepared by vacuum fractionation of atmospheric residue. Such a fraction is generally low in coke precursors and heavy metal contamination which can serve to contaminate catalyst. Heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks to which this invention may be applied include heavy bottoms from crude oil, heavy bitumen crude oil, shale oil, tar sand extract, deasphalted residue, products from coal liquefaction, atmospheric and vacuum reduced crudes. Heavy feedstocks for this invention also include mixtures of the above hydrocarbon streams and the foregoing list is not comprehensive.
The resulting mixture of catalyst and feed continues upwardly through the reactor riser 20 as the catalyst cracks the feed to lighter hydrocarbons while coke is deposited on the catalyst. At a top of the reactor riser 20 at least two disengaging arms 22 tangentially and horizontally discharge the mixture of product gas and spent catalyst from a top of the reactor riser 20 through ports 24 (only one is shown) into a disengaging section 26 of a stripping vessel 40 that effects partial separation of gases from the catalyst. The stripping vessel 40 is partially disposed in the reactor vessel 10. A transport conduit 28 carries the hydrocarbon vapors, including stripped hydrocarbons, stripping media and entrained catalyst from the stripping vessel 40 to one or more cyclones 30 in the reactor vessel 10 which further separates spent catalyst from the hydrocarbon vapor stream. A collection plenum 34 in the reactor vessel 10 gathers the separated hydrocarbon vapor streams from the cyclones 30 for passage to an outlet nozzle 36 and eventually into a fractionation recovery zone (not shown). Diplegs 38 discharge catalyst from the cyclones 30 into a bed 32 in a lower portion of the reactor vessel 10. The catalyst and adsorbed or entrained hydrocarbons in bed 32 eventually passes into a stripping vessel 40 across ports 42 defined in a wall 41 of the stripping vessel 40. Catalyst separated in the disengaging section 26 passes directly into a bed 27 above a lower portion of the stripping vessel 40. The stripping vessel 40 contains pairs of baffles comprising first baffles 44 and second baffles 46 to promote mixing between a stripping gas and the catalyst. The stripping gas, typically steam, enters a lower portion of the stripping vessel 40 through at least one inlet 47 to one or more distributors (not shown). The stripping gas travels upwardly counter-current to the cascading catalyst. The stripped spent catalyst leaves the stripping vessel 40 through a particle outlet 49 through a spent catalyst conduit 48 and passes into the regenerator vessel 50 at a rate regulated by a slide valve.
The reactor riser 20 of the FCC process is maintained at high temperature conditions which generally include a temperature above about 425° C. (797° F.). In an embodiment, the reaction zone is maintained at cracking conditions which include a temperature of from about 480° to about 590° C. (896 to 1094° F.) and a pressure of from about 69 to about 517 kPa (ga) (10 to 75 psig) but typically less than about 275 kPa (ga) (40 psig). The catalyst-to-oil ratio, based on the weight of catalyst and feed hydrocarbons entering the bottom of the riser, may range up to 20:1 but is typically between about 4:1 and about 10:1. Hydrogen is not normally added to the riser, although hydrogen addition is known in the art. In an embodiment, a substantial absence of added hydrogen, other than derived from the hydrocarbon feed, exists in the riser 20. Steam may be passed into the reactor riser 20 and reactor vessel 10 equivalent to about 4-7 wt-% of feed. The average residence time of catalyst in the riser may be less than about 5 seconds. The type of catalyst employed in the process may be chosen from a variety of commercially available catalysts. A catalyst comprising a zeolite base material is preferred, but the older style amorphous catalyst can be used if desired.
The regenerator vessel 50 may be a combustor type of regenerator, which may use hybrid turbulent bed-fast fluidized conditions in a high-efficiency regenerator vessel 50 for completely regenerating spent catalyst. However, other regenerator vessels and other flow conditions may be suitable for the present invention. The spent catalyst conduit 48 feeds spent catalyst to a first or lower chamber 52 defined by outer wall through a spent catalyst inlet chute. The spent catalyst from the reactor vessel 10 usually contains carbon in an amount of from 0.2 to 2 wt-%, which is present in the form of coke. Although coke is primarily composed of carbon, it may contain from 3 to 12 wt-% hydrogen as well as sulfur and other materials. An oxygen-containing combustion gas, typically air, enters the first chamber 52 of the regenerator vessel 50 through a conduit and is distributed by a distributor 66. Openings in the distributor 66 emit combustion gas. As the combustion gas enters a combustion section 58, it contacts spent catalyst entering from chute and lifts the catalyst at a superficial velocity of combustion gas in the first chamber 52 of at least 1.1 m/s (3.6 feet/second) under fast fluidized flow conditions. In an embodiment, the combustion section 58 will have a catalyst density of from 48 to 320 kg/m3 (about 3 to 20 lb/ft3) and a superficial gas velocity of 1.1 to 2.2 m/s (3.6 to 7.2 feet/second). The oxygen in the combustion gas contacts the spent catalyst and combusts carbonaceous deposits from the catalyst to at least partially regenerate the catalyst and generate flue gas.
The mixture of catalyst and combustion gas in the first chamber 52 ascend from the combustion section 58 through a frustoconical transition section 56 to the transport, riser section 60 of the first chamber 52. The riser section is defined by an outer wall to define a tube which is preferably cylindrical and extends preferably upwardly from the first chamber 52. The mixture of catalyst and gas travels at a higher superficial gas velocity than in the combustion section 58. The increased gas velocity is due to the reduced cross-sectional area of the riser section 60 relative to the cross-sectional area of the first chamber 52 below the transition section 56. Hence, the superficial gas velocity will usually exceed about 2.2 m/s (about 7.2 ft/s). The riser section 60 will have a lower catalyst density of less than about 80 kg/m3 (5 lb/ft3).
The regenerator vessel 50 also includes an upper or second chamber 54. The mixture of catalyst particles and flue gas is discharged from an upper portion of the riser section 60 into the second chamber 54. Substantially completely regenerated catalyst may exit the top of the transport, riser section 60, but arrangements in which partially regenerated catalyst exits from the first chamber 52 are also contemplated. Discharge is effected through a disengaging device 62 that separates a majority of the regenerated catalyst from the flue gas. In an embodiment, catalyst and gas flowing up the riser section 60 impact a top elliptical cap 64 of the riser section 60 and reverse flow. The catalyst and gas then exit through downwardly directed discharge inlets of disengaging device 62. The sudden loss of momentum and downward flow reversal cause a majority of the heavier catalyst to fall to the dense catalyst bed 68 and the lighter flue gas and a minor portion of the catalyst still entrained therein to ascend upwardly in the second chamber 54. Cyclones 63, 65 further separate catalyst from gas and deposits catalyst into dense bed. Flue gas exits the cyclones 63, 65 and collects in a plenum for passage to an outlet nozzle 67 of regenerator vessel 50 and perhaps into a flue gas or power recovery system (not shown). Downwardly falling disengaged catalyst collects in the dense catalyst bed 68. Catalyst densities in the dense catalyst bed 68 are typically kept within a range of from about 640 to about 960 kg/m3 (about 40 to 60 lb/ft3). A fluidizing conduit delivers fluidizing gas, typically air, to the dense catalyst bed 59 through a fluidizing distributor 70. In a combustor-style regenerator, approximately no more than 2% of the total gas requirements within the process enters the dense catalyst bed 68 through the fluidizing distributor 70. In this embodiment, gas is added here not for combustion purposes but only for fluidizing purposes, so the catalyst will fluidly exit through the standpipe 12. The fluidizing gas added through the fluidizing distributor 70 may be combustion gas. In the case where partial combustion is effected in the first chamber 52, greater amounts of combustion gas will be fed to the second chamber 54 through fluidizing distributor 70. Regenerated catalyst is returned through regenerator conduit 12 back to the reactor riser 20.
An embodiment of an annular baffle configuration is shown in
We have observed that in certain cases, especially in larger diameter stripping vessels and/or operation with low catalyst flux rates, stripping fluid ascends along opposed walls of the stripping vessel while catalyst channels down the middle of the annulus between the opposed walls. The catalyst does not have enough momentum to spread out on the baffles but only hits the projecting end of the baffles. Hence, the catalyst is contacted with less stripping fluid thereby diminishing stripping efficiency. To prevent the catalyst from bypassing baffles, the baffles include a second face 44b, 46b secured to the projecting edge of the first face 44a, 46a, respectively, which extends into the downcomer channel 72 between adjacent baffles. The second face 44b, 46b directs descending catalyst across the downcomer channel 72 to a vertical position above the subjacent baffle, preferably above the first face 46a, 44a of the subjacent baffle 46, 44. This arrangement significantly inhibits baffle bypassing.
In an embodiment, a skirt 78 may extend downwardly from the baffles 44, 46 and optionally at an intersection 82 between a secured edge of the second face 44b, 46b and the projecting edge of the first face 44a, 46a. The skirt 78 is typically vertical and depends from the bottom of the baffle 44, 46. The skirt 78 is provided to increase the pressure drop across the openings. In the embodiment of an annular stripper as shown in
The second face 44b, 46b is angled with respect to the first face 44a, 46a, respectively, which means they define an angle α with each other that is other than 180°. Preferably, the second face 44b defines a greater acute angle β up from vertical than an acute angle θ that the first face 44a defines up from the vertical, and the second face 46b defines a greater acute angle ω up from vertical than an acute angle ε that the first face 46a defines up from the vertical. In
The baffles 44, 46 may be coated with a refractory.
In practice and referring to
Stripping fluid and stripped hydrocarbons are recovered from the stripping vessel 40 through transport conduit 28, cyclones 30 and outlet nozzle 36. Stripped, spent catalyst is recovered through outlet 49 for passage through spent catalyst conduit 48 to the regenerator vessel 50. In the regenerator, the catalyst is regenerated by coke combustion, and regenerated catalyst is sent via regenerator conduit 12 to the reactor riser 20.
Palmas, Paolo, Couch, Keith A., Spinelli, Giovanni, Lambin, Jason P.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 8877132, | Apr 20 2012 | UOP LLC | Baffles for improving riser hydrodynamics |
| 9238210, | Dec 20 2013 | Kellogg Brown & Root LLC | Baffle system for fluid catalytic cracking |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 2440620, | |||
| 2541801, | |||
| 2612438, | |||
| 2994659, | |||
| 3894932, | |||
| 4364905, | Nov 23 1979 | Standard Oil Company (Indiana) | Fluid catalytic cracking apparatus having riser reactor and improved means associated with the riser reactor for separating cracked product and entrained particulate catalyst |
| 4414100, | Dec 29 1981 | CHEVRON RESEARCH COMPANY, A CORP OF DE | Fluidized catalytic cracking |
| 4481103, | Oct 19 1983 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Fluidized catalytic cracking process with long residence time steam stripper |
| 4500423, | Feb 26 1981 | Chevron Research Company | Separation of reacted hydrocarbons and catalyst in fluidized catalytic cracking |
| 4689206, | Oct 22 1984 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Multistage stripper for FCC unit with improved catalyst separation |
| 4741883, | Jul 18 1984 | Mobil Oil Corp. | FCC catalyst separation apparatus |
| 5015363, | Sep 25 1987 | UOP | FCC stripping method |
| 5043055, | Apr 27 1990 | MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, A CORP OF NY | Process and apparatus for hot catalyst stripping above a bubbling bed catalyst regenerator |
| 5112576, | May 25 1990 | Amoco Corporation | Catalytic cracking unit with combined catalyst separator and stripper |
| 5391289, | Sep 04 1990 | Chevron Research and Technology Company | FCC process with rapid separation of products |
| 5910240, | Dec 23 1996 | Mobil Oil Corporation | FCC unit catalyst stripper |
| 6126905, | Feb 27 1998 | Phillips Petroleum Company | Baffles for a fluid to fluid contactor |
| 6162402, | Dec 05 1997 | UOP LLC | FCC apparatus with combined regenerator stripper and catalyst blending |
| 6740227, | Dec 29 1999 | UOP LLC | Stripping process with fully distributed openings on baffles |
| 7118715, | Nov 21 2001 | UOP LLC | Stripping process with disproportionately distributed openings on baffles |
| 7276210, | Aug 20 2003 | Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. -Petrobras | Stripping apparatus and process |
| 20050040075, | |||
| 20050205467, | |||
| WO2007094771, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Sep 23 2008 | COUCH, KEITH A | UOP LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 021594 | /0085 | |
| Sep 23 2008 | PALMAS, PAOLO | UOP LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 021594 | /0085 | |
| Sep 23 2008 | SPINELLI, GIOVANNI | UOP LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 021594 | /0085 | |
| Sep 24 2008 | LAMBIN, JASON P | UOP LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 021594 | /0085 | |
| Sep 25 2008 | UOP LLC | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Apr 24 2015 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| May 14 2019 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
| May 09 2023 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Nov 22 2014 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| May 22 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Nov 22 2015 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Nov 22 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Nov 22 2018 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| May 22 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Nov 22 2019 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Nov 22 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Nov 22 2022 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| May 22 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Nov 22 2023 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Nov 22 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |