A digital content transmission and reception system that uses feedback and re-transmission of missing content is described. A content transmission system broadcasts a complete set of digital content to a plurality of content reception systems via a communication link. A content reception system receives a corresponding incomplete set of digital content, determines particular content portions that are missing, and provided feedback indicating the missing content portions to the content distribution system. The content distribution system the re-transmits content based on the feedback.
|
9. A method comprising:
transmitting a plurality of content portions representing a complete set of digital television data to each of a plurality of reception systems;
transmitting a manifest to each of the plurality of reception systems, wherein the manifest indicates the plurality of content portions representing the complete set of the digital television data;
receiving feedback from a reception system of the plurality of reception systems, the feedback indicating a content portion of the plurality of content portions that was not received by the reception system;
determining content portions to retransmit with an algorithm based on how strongly quality is affected by content portions that are missing; and
retransmitting the content portion based on the received feedback indicating the content portion.
2. A method comprising:
transmitting a plurality of content portions representing a complete set of digital television data to each of a plurality of reception systems;
transmitting a manifest to each of the plurality of reception systems, wherein the manifest indicates the plurality of content portions representing the complete set of the digital television data;
receiving feedback from a reception system of the plurality of reception systems, the feedback indicating a content portion of the plurality of content portions that was not received by the reception system;
determining content portions to retransmit with an algorithm based on how frequently a content portion is reported to be missing from a plurality of reception systems; and
retransmitting the content portion based on the received feedback indicating the content portion.
1. A method comprising:
transmitting a plurality of content portions representing a complete set of digital television data to each of a plurality of reception systems;
transmitting a manifest to each of the plurality of reception systems, wherein the manifest indicates the plurality of content portions representing the complete set of the digital television data;
receiving feedback from a reception system of the plurality of reception systems, the feedback indicating a content portion of the plurality of content portions that was not received by the reception system;
determining content portions to retransmit with an algorithm based on whether a predetermined run-length of sequential content portions are indicated to be missing in the received feedback; and
retransmitting the content portion based on the received feedback indicating the content portion.
15. A content transmission system comprising:
a transmitter to transmit a plurality of content portions representing a complete set of digital television data to each of a plurality of reception systems, and to transmit a manifest to each of the plurality of reception systems, the manifest to indicate the plurality of content portions that represent the complete set of the digital television data; and
a re-transmission system coupled with the transmitter, the re-transmission system to receive feedback from each of the plurality of reception systems, each feedback to indicate one or more content portions, of the plurality of content portions representing the complete set, that were not received by a corresponding reception system, the re-transmission system to determine content portions to re-transmit to the plurality of reception systems by using an algorithm based on how frequently content portions are reported to be missing from the plurality of reception systems in the feedback from the reception systems, the re-transmission system to re-transmit the determined content portions to the plurality of reception systems.
18. A content transmission system comprising:
a transmitter to transmit a plurality of content portions representing a complete set of digital television data to each of a plurality of reception systems, and to transmit a manifest to each of the plurality of reception systems, the manifest to indicate the plurality of content portions that represent the complete set of the digital television data; and
a re-transmission system coupled with the transmitter, the re-transmission system to receive feedback from each of the plurality of reception systems, each feedback to indicate one or more content portions, of the plurality of content portions representing the complete set, that were not received by a corresponding reception system, the re-transmission system to determine content portions to re-transmit to a given reception system by using an algorithm based on how strongly quality is affected by content portions that are missing from the given reception system as indicated in the feedback from the given reception system, and the re-transmission system to re-transmit the determined content portions to the given reception system.
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
6. The method of
7. The method of
8. The method of
10. The method of
11. The method of
12. The method of
13. The method of
14. The method of
16. The content transmission system of
17. The content transmission system of
19. The content transmission system of
20. The content transmission system of
21. The content transmission system of
22. The content transmission system of
23. The content transmission system of
|
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application No. 09/895,433, filed on Jun. 29, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,363,569, entitled “Correcting for Data Losses with Feedback and Response”. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/895,433 is hereby incorporated entirely herein by reference.
Contained herein is material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the United States Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all rights to the copyright whatsoever. The following notice applies to the software and data as described below and in the drawings hereto: Copyright © 2001, Intel Corporation, All Rights Reserved.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to data transmission and reception. More particularly, the invention relates to a system and method for transmitting digital content and receiving feedback indicative of the lost content that was not adequately received.
2. Background Information
Television data is frequently lost during transmission. The potential causes are numerous and include known causes, such as physical disturbances (e.g., buildings), weather, electromagnetic interference and other known causes and intangible or unknown causes. Such losses, regardless of the cause, may significantly reduce the quality and entertainment value of the television viewing experience.
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements. The invention itself, however, as well as a preferred mode of use, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings:
In the following description, for the purpose of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without some of these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form.
Content Transmission and Reception Systems
The digital content 210 may be any type of digital content desired for the particular implementation and is to be interpreted broadly. By way of example, the digital content 210 may be computer software, multimedia (e.g., movies, video on demand, video games), video, audio (e.g., MP3s), streaming audio video similar to television data, and other types of content (e.g., structured data). For example, the content 210 may be premier cached digital feature film content for delayed viewing. The digital content 210 has a digital format, which makes it possible to perform digital processing including electronic manipulation, compression, preservation, and perfect copying. For example, an identical copy of the digital content 210 may be created and a bit-wise comparison of the original and the copy may be used to verify that the two are identical.
The digital content 210 is in an electronically accessible format. Typically, the digital content 210 will exist as a computer file having a particular file format that is compatible, standard, or efficient for the type of content and will be stored in a memory. For example, in the case of an audio content, the file format may be an MP3 format and the content 210 may be stored in a memory representing an audio library. However, other embodiments are contemplated. For example, the digital content 210 may exist as a stream of digital data that is provided by a digital data generating device (e.g., a digital camera/recorder), an electronically connected source or provider (e.g., a news feed or a stock ticker), or another electronically connected entity. In any event, the digital content 210 is accessible to the content transmission system 220.
The content transmission system 220 accesses the digital content 210 and distributes it. The term “transmit” will be used broadly to refer to all transmission or transmission methods where a content containing machine-accessible signal is provided to content reception systems such as system 250. For example, transmitting may include broadcasting the signal simultaneously to multiple recipients (similarly to the way network television is broadcast) or narrowcast to specific recipients (similarly to cable television).
The content transmission system 220 may be any transmission system sufficient to transmit content and receive feedback including terrestrial, satellite, cable, and other transmission systems. The content transmission system 220 may contain hardware, firmware, and software, or any combination to access and transmit the digital content 210. The content transmission system 220 may have a processor to execute instructions, a memory to store content, an encoder to encode content, and a transmitter to transmit a content containing signal. According to one embodiment, conventional technologies may be used, together with any desirable modifications that will be apparent to those skilled in the art based on the discussion herein, to perform the actual transmission processing and transmission of the content. For example, as will be discussed in further detail elsewhere, in one embodiment, the digital content 210 may be divided into logical portions that are convenient for processing and transmission, converted to an MPEG-based format, and transmitted using a conventional data transmitter system.
According to one embodiment, the content transmission system 220 is a system to transmit the digital content 210 over a substantially one way communication link 230, in which the predominant or only direction of transmission is from the transmission system 220 to the reception system 250. In one case, the link 230 may be bidirectional, although typically, the link will be a substantially non-client-server link. A client server link would be typified by the reception system 250 issuing a request for content 210 and the transmission system 220 then issuing the content 210 in response, similarly to the way that web pages may be received using the Internet. In contrast, in a non-client-server link, the transmission system 220 may provide the digital content 210 without the request. That is, the content transmission system 220 may transmit content to the content reception system 250, and typically a plurality of other content reception systems simultaneously, without receiving a specific request that is processed and responded to or supplied.
Typically, the link 230 will be a link that is shared by multiple reception systems such as reception system 250. The link 230 may be based on a number of technologies, including satellite and dish, fiber optic, coaxial cable, and others. For example, the link 230 may be a one way electromagnetic radiation broadcast pipe in which the content 210 is simultaneously broadcast to all of the recipients connected with a network (e.g., having an antenna like rabbit ears or a satellite dish to receive the transmission) or narrowcast to a select group of recipients (e.g., having authorization to receive the transmission). The link 230 may carry a digital TV channel with a bandwidth of 19.39 megabits per second and may be partitioned among multiple channels such as four channels that each carry 4.85 megabits per second, which may carry either content or retransmitted content. For example, one of the four channels may be implemented as a regularly running low-bandwidth channel that constantly carries current resend missing packets.
The content reception system 250 typically adequately receives and stores only a subset of the transmitted content 210. The digital content 210 may comprise a totality of a plurality of ordered and sequenced portions and transmission or other losses may result in missing content which amount to holes or gaps in the received content. The term “missing content” is to be interpreted broadly as content that has not been adequately received. This includes content that has not been received, has not been received completely, or that has not been received without errors or other problems. Typically, a whole discrete portion of digital content will be lost or erroneous, although other embodiments are contemplated. These errors or losses result in content that has missing portions, holes, or gaps that may degrade the quality and reduce the usefulness of the content for many applications and uses.
The reception system 250 may attempt to correct for the missing portions by detecting, determining, or discovering the errors or missing portions and providing feedback identifying them to another system or component, typically belonging to or associated with the content transmission system 220, which in turn may provide at least some of the erroneous or missing portions to supplement the incomplete set of content. The content reception system 250 may be any system that is able to receive the content, determine when there is missing content, and provide feedback. The content reception system 250 may contain hardware, firmware, and software, or any combination to receive content and provide feedback. The content reception system 250 may have an interface to receive a content containing signal, a decoder to decode the signal, a memory to store the content, and a processor to execute instructions, such as missing content determination instructions. According to one embodiment, conventional technologies may be used, together with any desirable modifications that will be apparent to those skilled in the art based on the discussion herein, to receive the content and transmit feedback. By way of example, the content reception system 250 may comprise a personal computer coupled with a receiver (e.g., connected with an antenna), a digital television set having a memory and a processor, a television set with a set top box having a memory and a processor, a personal video recorder, and other computer systems. The content reception system 250 may have different levels of intelligence, as desired, such as intelligence to know to connect with the communication link (e.g., tune to a particular channel to receive a corresponding predetermined broadcast transmission) and to have intelligence to receive and use a schedule of content broadcasts (e.g., to use a conceptual TV guide of sorts).
The system 200 determines missing content. Determining missing content may include comparing information indicating a complete set of content with content that was adequately received to determine if any content indicated by the complete set has not been adequately received. The determination may be made by the content reception system 250 or by the content transmission system 220.
Consider an embodiment in which the content reception system 250 makes the determination of missing content. In this embodiment, the manifest is generated by the content transmission system 220, transmitted to and received by the content reception system 250, and used by the content reception system 250 to make the determination. Different types of manifests are contemplated, including manifests that list portions transmitted, portions before transmission, and others. The content reception system 250 may receive the manifest and implement a method that includes determining if any content portions indicated in the manifest have not been adequately received. Conceptually, and without limitation, the manifest may be a table of contents listing all the chapters in a book that the content reception system 250 may use to determine if all chapters listed in the table of contents have been adequately received. For example, a journaling agent of the reception system 250 uses a manifest indicating a complete set of content portions belonging to digital content 210 to determine what the missing or erroneous portions of a received incomplete set of digital content 210 are, and keeps a journal, record, or log of missing content, addresses of the missing content, sizes of the missing content, and other desired information.
The content reception system 250 provides feedback indicative of the missing content to the content transmission system 220. The phrase “indicative of the missing content” and related phrases will be used to refer to feedback indications that either directly indicate the missing content or that may be used to determine the missing content. In embodiments where the reception system 250 determines the missing content, the feedback will typically directly indicate the missing content. In embodiments in which the transmission system 220 determines the missing content, the feedback may include information that may be used by the transmission system 220 to determine the missing content. For example, the information may indicate all content portions that were adequately received by the reception system 250. With this information, the transmission system 220 may be able to determine missing content, such as by using a manifest, and by other approaches.
According to one embodiment, the feedback is provided by a second communication link 240. Typically, the second link 240 will communicate a smaller data load than the link 230, which results in reduced load at the transmission system 220. Accordingly, the link 240 may not need much bandwidth and may have less total bandwidth than the link 230. The link 240 may be such that the reception system 250 may provide the feedback affordably, without expensive, bulky, or otherwise undesirable transmission systems. The link 240 may be one way or bidirectional, as desired. Other desirable qualities for the link 240 of certain embodiments include existing availability to many residences and businesses, ease of installation or activation, low cost per unit bandwidth. According to one embodiment, the link 240 makes use of a wire-based link available at a business or residence associated with the reception system 250. For example, the link 240 may be based on a telephone line, coaxial cable, a cable line, all types of digital subscriber lines (xDSL), and others. The link may also be wireless, such as by cellular telephone, Very Small Aperture Terminal (VSAT), and others.
The content transmission system 220 is capable of receiving the feedback indicative of missing content and re-transmitting based on this feedback. Typically, the content will be re-transmitted on the communication link 230 to the content reception system 250, although re-transmission over the link 240 is also contemplated.
According to one embodiment, the content transmission system 220 includes novel software instructions to interpret the feedback and to re-transmit content based on the feedback. The software instructions may comprise retransmission instructions that interpret feedback indicative of content received or not received at the content reception system 250 and determine content to re-transmit to the content reception system 250.
The re-transmission instructions will typically depend on the business environment and objectives of the particular implementation. In one embodiment, the re-transmission instructions provide that all missing portions are resent. This may use the most bandwidth but may provide the best overall quality to the end consumer of the content. This may be preferred when the content is software programs, and in other situations. Alternatively, strategic subsets of content that is missing from the system 250 may be re-transmitted. The strategic subsets of the actual missing content may be determined based on weighting or ranking. The strategic subsets may also be determined based on how strongly the quality is affected. For example, missing content may be provided if a predetermined number or run-length of sequential portions are missing. The content distributor may also elect to determine content to re-transmit based on compliance with an acceptable or guaranteed level.
Determining content to re-transmit may also be based on feedback from multiple reception systems such as the content reception system 250. For example, in one embodiment, content is re-transmitted based on how frequently it is reported to be missing from multiple reception systems. For example, content may be re-transmitted if it is reported to be missing from N % of the multiple reception systems, where N % is a percentage that is suitable or desirable for the particular implementation. In this way, a majority of the missing content may be provided with a reduced bandwidth. This may be useful when broadcast errors are likely to effect the same missing content, such as by being dependent on the content, the time of transmission, the location of the reception system 250, and otherwise.
Alternatively, re-transmission may be performed according to numerous other motivations that are desired for the particular implementation and that will be apparent to those having an ordinary level of skill in the art based on the discussion contained herein. For example, the re-transmission of content may be based on user preferences indicated in the feedback.
Regardless of the particular implementation, bandwidth used to re-transmit data is of value to the transmission system 220, which may lease the bandwidth at great cost. The feedback loop provided by many embodiments permits missing data to be retransmitted according to instructions that take into consideration accurate knowledge of data that is actually missing from one or more receiving systems of users or clients. The transmission system 220 and the retransmission instructions may use this feedback to balance the bandwidth costs of re-transmission with its business objectives and motivations. This may provide better management and utilization of bandwidth than possible with systems that retransmit extra data due to a lack of knowledge of what data may be missing. Advantageously, this may allow improved revenue generation per bit of transmission bandwidth.
As desired, different re-transmission instructions may be used for different types of losses and for different types of content. For example, losses occurring predominantly over a period of time, such as due to signal interruption or due to a buffer filling up, may be processed differently compared with random or unordered losses dispersed chronologically throughout the content. Likewise, different processing may be used for audio compared to video. Accordingly, rules and policies may be developed with varying levels of sophistication, as desired.
The content reception system 250 receives the re-transmitted content and may use this content to reduce the amount of missing content. By way of example, if the content reception system 250 was initially missing content “A” and the re-transmitted content to system 250 included contents “A”, “B”, and “C”, the system 250 may determine that the recently received content included missing content “A” and may selectively combine received content “A” with the previously received contents. In this way, the reception system 250 may selectively fill missing content with re-transmitted content.
After receiving any retransmitted content and combining the re-transmitted content with the previously received incomplete set of content, the content reception system 250 may provide the supplemented content to the recipient 260. The recipient 260 may be a human or system recipient of the digital content 210. For example, in the case where the content reception system 250 is capable of presenting the digital content 210 in a human consumable format (e.g., as video presented on a display device), the recipient 260 may be a user, subscriber, viewer, or listener. Alternatively, in cases where the reception system 250 does not have this capability, the recipient 260 may be a system such as a presentation device. For example, the recipient may be a digital television, a personal video recorder, a stereo, an MP3 player, a CD ROM burner, and other digital content recipients. Typically, the end result of the transmission, feedback, and re-transmission will be entertainment data that is consumed by humans, however the invention is not so limited.
The discussion above has been provided to illustrate, without limitation, the invention according to exemplary embodiments. Other embodiments are contemplated. For example, the feedback and re-transmission may be performed repeatedly until the missing data has been sufficiently reduced. Also, feedback may be provided as a viewer consumes the content and may be prioritized based on the difference between current time and expected consumption time when the missing content is needed. Additionally, although the re-transmission rules have been described for the content transmission system 220, the content reception system 250 may have varying levels of control of what and how much data is re-transmitted. For example, according to one embodiment, the content reception system 250 may apply user preferences, such as through a user profile, to control or modify the feedback based on user preferences and quality standards (e.g., may prioritize feedback based on content type).
A content transmission system 305 accesses content 310 and includes a transmitter 315 that transmits the content to a content reception system 350 via a first communication link 320. By way of example, the first communication link 320 may be a satellite, microwave, cable, or other link. The content reception system 350 includes a receiver 355 that receives content 360. Typically content 360 includes some but not all of the content 310.
The content reception system 350 includes a reception verification system 365 functionally coupled with the receiver 355 that determines that missing content 370 is a part of content 310 that has not been received. The reception verification system 365 provides feedback indicative of missing content to the transmission system 305 over a second communication link 375. The second communication link 375 may be a link that is commonly found in houses or businesses or that is easily and affordably installed in the houses or businesses. By way of example, the second link 375 may be a telephone line link, an xDSL link, a cable link, the Internet, and other links.
The content transmission system 305 includes a re-transmission system 325 functionally coupled with the transmitter 315 that provides an interface to the second communication link 375 and that receives the feedback indicative of the missing content. The re-transmission system 325 interprets the feedback and includes re-transmission instructions 330 to determine missing content 335 to retransmit to the content reception system 350. By way of example, the following conditional logic may represent an exemplary re-transmission instruction: “if a content is indicated to be missing, then re-transmit said content portion”. The transmitter 315 transmits the missing content 335. The transmission of the missing content is indicated as a separate dashed line, for convenience and to indicate that typically the transmissions will be performed at different times, although frequently transmission of the content 310 and the missing content 335 will be performed in substantially the same way and over the same link 320.
The content reception system receives missing content 380, which may be different than missing content 335 due to losses. The content reception system may implement a method to combine missing content 380 with content 360. According to one embodiment, reception system 350 uses known identifiers of missing content portions, such as contained in missing content 370, to locate corresponding missing content portions in missing content 380, and extracts the corresponding content from 380 to fill missing content “holes” in content 360.
Although not a limitation of the invention, typically the content reception system 350 provides content 360 and at least some of missing content 380 to a recipient 385. Without limitation, consider an exemplary content reception system 350 having a display device and a memory (e.g., a cache) to store the content 360 (which may be multimedia video and audio corresponding to a feature film). Storage of the content 360 results in gaps due to missing content 370 that are at least partly filled by missing content 380. After sufficiently filling the gaps, to a desired extent, stored content is transferred from the memory to the display device for presentation to a viewing user recipient 385. Advantageously, the recipient 385 views improved multimedia content that benefits from a missing content feedback and re-transmission process that at least partly mitigates content losses due to data transmission.
Digital Television Reception Systems
The receiver 410 receives digital content and provides the digital content to the set top box 420. The receiver may be any conventional receiver. Typically, the receiver will be hardware, such as an antenna (e.g., rabbit ears, satellite dish, etc.) or a cable outlet that interfaces to a cable service system. The receiver is functionally and/or physically coupled with the set top box 420 to provide the digital content to the set top box 420.
The set top box 420 receives digital content from the receiver 410, provides feedback to a convenient residential communication link, such as a telephone jack, and provides digital content to the digital television 440. As shown, the set top box 420 may have a memory 422 to store digital content and a reception verification system 424 to generate the feedback 430 via a backchannel link.
The digital television 440 receives the digital content from the set top box 420. The television 440 and the box 420 are shown to be proximate, although this need not be the case. The television 440 includes a display 442 (and may additionally contain speakers and other features that are not shown) to present the digital content to a television viewer. Optionally, the digital television 440 may have a user interface capability 444 to allow the television viewer to interact with the television 440 and/or the set top box 420. For example, the interface 444 may allow the user to select content to receive, select content to view, select stored content to delete, turn off the feedback, adjust a priority indicated in the feedback, and make other indications that will be apparent to a person having an ordinary level of skill in the art, based on the discussion contained herein.
A Method for Correcting Digital Content for Losses
The method 500 commences at block 501, and then proceeds to block 505, where digital content is transmitted from a content transmission system to a content reception system. One way transmission 510 indicates that the content transmission may be performed over a substantially one way communication link, such as an electromagnetic broadcast or a satellite transmission, according to one embodiment. The digital content may include digital data indicative of a complete set of digital content. For example, a plurality of content portions may be indicated in the transmission and the chronological presentation sequence of the content portions may also be indicated.
The method 500 advances from block 505 to block 515 where digital content is received by a content reception system. According to one embodiment, the received digital content is substantially similar to, but different than, the transmitted digital content due to data transmission losses.
The method 500 advances from block 515 to block 520 where content reception verification is performed to determine if there is missing content. According to one embodiment, this includes comparing a received indication of a complete set of content portions with a set of content portions that were adequately received.
The method 500 advances from block 520 to block 525 where feedback indicative that content is missing is transmitted to the content transmission system. Feedback 530 indicates that this indication may be provided over a different communication link than the one way communication link. The feedback may be provided in different ways, including at a determined end of content transmission, according to a predetermined schedule, in real time, and by other ways.
The method 500 advances from block 525 to block 535 where the feedback is received by the content transmission system. For example, the content transmission system may receive a list of indicators corresponding to a plurality of content portions that were not received by the reception system and that have been determined to be missing.
The method 500 advances from block 535 to block 540 where missing content to be re-transmitted is determined based on the feedback. A number of such determinations have been described, and those having an ordinary level of skill in the art will appreciate that there are many additional ways and motivations to make this determination, based on the discussion contained herein.
The method 500 advances from block 540 to block 545 where the determined missing content is transmitted to the content reception system. Policy may drive determining and transmitting the missing content, rather than blindly transmitting all missing content. The transmission may be delayed and scheduled, rather than performing the transmission of missing content within a time period defined by a sliding window that moves relative to the initial transmission of a content portion. For example, feedback indicating missing content may be received, aggregated, missing content for re-transmission determined, and the determined content re-transmitted at a predetermined scheduled time, rather than during an exemplary three-minute window relative to when a content portion was initially transmitted. One way transmission 550 indicates that this missing content may be transmitted on the same one way communication link used to transmit the initial content.
The method 500 advances from block 545 to block 555 where missing content is received by the reception system. The content received may be different than the content transmitted due to transmission losses.
The method 500 advances from block 555 to block 560 where the received missing content is combined with previously received content. For example, the received missing content may be ordered in a memory according to an inherent and/or explicit order associated with the content. Since the received missing content may itself having missing content due to transmission losses during one way transmission 550, the method 500 may revisit blocks 520, 525, 535, 540, 545, 555, and 560 until the true amount of missing content has been reduced to an acceptable level.
The method 500 advances from block 560 to block 565 where the combined content is presented for consumption. For example, the content may be provided to a presentation device (e.g., television, stereo, etc.) for presentation to one or more users. The method terminates at block 570.
The method 505A commences at block 601, and then proceeds to block 610, where digital content is provided. This may include accessing the content from a memory, receiving the content from a networked entity (e.g., a server, a news feed, etc.), and other ways that content may be provided.
The method 505A advances from block 610 to block 620 where the content is divided into multiple content portions. Typically, the content portions will be conveniently sized, contiguous, sequentially ordered portions, such as packets. This may also include providing proper headers that contain descriptive information about the content portions including the content that the portions correspond to, an ordering, and other desired information. For example, the portion or packet may have a unique numerical identifier or a byte offset to indicate the ordering.
The method 505A advances from block 620 to block 630 where a manifest is created for the digital content. The manifest may represent a complete set of the content portions, such as through a list of identifiers of the complete set.
The method 505A advances from block 630 to block 640 where a transmission schedule for transmission of the manifest and the content portions is created. Creation of this schedule may take into consideration bandwidth, and other limitations.
The method 505A advances from block 640 to block 650 where transmission processing of the manifest and the content portions is performed according to the schedule. Transmission processing may include conventional pre-transmission processing including various forms of compression, encoding, encryption, checking, etc. In the case of video content, a number of digital video compression standards and file formats are contemplated, including Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG) and non-MPEG standards. In the case of MPEG, MPEG-1 may be used and MPEG-2 or MPEG-4 may be used when higher resolutions are desired. Other algorithms are contemplated. For example, an algorithm to create a zip format may be used. The method 505A terminates at block 660.
A Method for Performing Content Reception Verification
The method 520A commences at block 701 and then advances to block 710 where a manifest is accessed. The manifest may have been received with the digital content and stored. The method 520A advances from block 710 to block 720 where the manifest is parsed to locate an identifier of a content portion.
A determination is made at decision block 730 whether the identifier corresponds to an identifier of a received content portion. This may involve a bit wise comparison of identifiers in the manifest and in the received content. If no is the determination 750 then the method 520A advances to block 760. If yes is the determination 740 then the method advances to block 770.
The method 520A advances from decision 750 to block 760 where the content portion is recorded as missing. According to one embodiment, this recording is done in a data structure, such as a log, record, file, or other data structure, that may be transmitted and interpreted by the content transmission system. Accordingly, the format of the data structure may comply with and be compatible to the transmission system.
The method 520A advances from block 760 to decision block 770 where a determination is made whether the manifest contains an additional identifier. As stated above, this may include parsing and interpreting structured data of the manifest. If yes is the determination 780, then the method 520A revisits block 730. If no is the determination 790, such as might occur if an end of file flag is encountered, then the method 520A terminates at block 795.
A content transmission system 805 transmits a manifest 810 including indicators for N content portions (CP1, . . . CPN, where N is an integer) and a content 815 including N corresponding content portions to a content reception system 850. The content portions each have headers containing descriptive information and data.
The content reception system 850 receives an identical copy of the manifest 855 and a flawed non-identical copy of the content 860 in which a content portion 2 820 is absent as indicated by missing content 865. The reception system 850 contains reception verification logic to detect missing content 865, record the missing content 865 in a journal 875, and provide an indication that content portion 2 820 is missing.
The transmission system 805 receives the indication, interprets the indication, and includes re-transmission instructions 825 to determine missing content 830, which in this case happens to be only content portion 2 820, to re-transmit to the reception system 850. In this particular case, the reception system 850 receives an identical copy of the content portion 2 880.
The method 650A commences at block 901, and then proceeds to block 910, where streams are created for transmission of digital content. The method 650A advances from block 910 to block 920 where the streams are encapsulated inside MPEG elementary streams. The method 650A advances from block 920 to block 930 where elementary streams are multiplexed into an MPEG-2 stream. The method 650A advances from block 930 to block 940 where the MPEG-2 stream is modulated and transmitted (e.g., broadcast). The method 650A terminates at block 950.
A transmission system 1040 transmits the content and the manifest as scheduled. The transmission system may use MPEG processing that includes a payload stream generator/transmitter 1045 to create a payload stream, an MPEG stream encapsulator and inserter 1050 to create an encapsulated stream, an MPEG-2 multiplexer 1055 to create a multiplexed transport stream, and a modulator 1060. The transmission system 1040 provides the digital content to the transmission link.
Typically sometime later, a re-transmission system 1065 receives feedback from a feedback link. The re-transmission system 1065 may use re-transmission instructions 1070 predetermined for the particular implementation to determine re-transmission data 1075 based on the feedback. Typically, the data 1075 consists of a subset of the content 1005. The data 1075 may be transferred as described for the content 1005, or differently as desired.
The payload may be provided to a content storage system 1125 that stores metadata 1130, such as content descriptions and announcements, and content 1135. Either in real time or at the end of the transmission, a reception verification system 1140 may determine whether the content 1135 is an incomplete set of content, such as a subset of content 1005. In particular, the verification system 1140 may comprise reception verification logic 1145 to make this determination, such as by comparison of a manifest and received content as previously described, and to record missing content in missing content log 1150. Typically, if there is missing content, the system 1140 provides feedback to a feedback link. Content responsive to the feedback may be provided to the reception system 1105, and combined with content 1135, as previously described.
Correcting for Data Losses During Satellite Delivery of Multicast IP Data
To further illustrate the invention, according to one embodiment, consider without limitation an entity associated with a content transmission system that decides to broadcast a movie M to a plurality of remote and geographically distributed reception systems. The movie M is divided into three equal-sized chunks for transmission. Each chunk is given a unique identification: C1, C2, and C3. These chunks are grouped together, or “packaged,” with the unique identification P and stored in a memory.
At a predetermined and scheduled time, the transmission system accesses the package P from the memory. The transmission system may be a transmission system server S residing at a satellite uplink facility, such as a “head end”. The server may feed multicast IP data downstream to an inserter. Starting with C1, the server encodes the data as a series of UHTTP (Unidirectional HyperText Transport Protocol) packets that are subsequently placed on the head end's local network. By way of example, each of these packets may be 2 kilobytes in size.
The packets, UHTTP or otherwise may contain a prefacing header comprised of a sequence of bytes before the actual content bytes. Table 1 shows components of an exemplary UHTTP header.
Name
Size
Description
Version
5
bits
Describes the version of the protocol.
ExtensionHeader
1
bit
When set, this bit indicates that one
or more extension header fields are
present.
HTTPHeadersPrecede
1
bit
When set to 1, HTTP-style headers
precede the payload bytes.
CRCFollows
1
bit
When set to 1, a 32-bit CRC is
calculated on this packet.
PacketsInXORBlock
1
byte
If non-zero, defines the number of
packets present in the XOR block
used for forward error correction.
RetransmitExpiration
2
bytes
Time in seconds over which the
resource may be retransmitted.
TransferID
16
bytes
A Globally Unique ID for the
encoded resource.
ResourceSize
4
bytes
Size of the encoded resource.
SegStartByte
4
bytes
Start byte in the transfer for this data
segment.
Extension Headers
Any extension headers, if present.
Data payload
A segment of the resource's data.
Total length:
28
bytes
The data inserter watches the head end's network for multicast traffic and captures or extracts multicast IP data, such as the UHTTP packets, off the head ends network, and multiplexes them into an MPEG-2 compliant transport stream that already contains digital television elementary streams. This multiplexed stream is then fed to a modulator that is configured to take the MPEG-2 compliant transport stream and bounce if off a satellite.
A reception system in the field has a demodulator operable to convert a signal received from a satellite back into an MPEG-2 compliant transport stream. The system tunes the demodulator to an appropriate frequency and begins to receive P from the satellite. The system includes a decoder operable to extract IP data from an MPEG-2 compliant transport stream, and pipe it to a TCP/IP stack. A transmission receiver converts multicast IP data extracted from the receiver's TCP/IP stack back into a replica of the source data.
The reception system may comprise a reception verification system to identify any missing segments of the transmission. For example, based on information indicating a complete package P, the reception system may know that it needs to receive C1, C2, and C3 in order to successfully replicate P. One-by-one, it may examine the UHTTP-encoded packets for these identifiers, decoding and copying those containing the appropriate IDs to a data cache that is capable of holding data for local use by the reception system. After processing the entirety of P's encoded data, the reception system determines that it is missing data segments from C2. By examining the content already received, it notes that it is missing the 100th through 103rd segments.
This information is stored until a prearranged time when the receiver will make a connection to the head end. The reception system may use a system-resident telephone modem capable of connecting to the broadcast head end either on demand, or according to a predetermined schedule to send a brief message to the transmission server containing the following information: a tag identifying the message as a repair data request, P's unique identification, C2's unique Identification, and a list of missing segments: 100, 101, 102, and 103. For example, the reception system may send a message conveying this information that has the format indicated in Table 2.
Name
Size
Description
PackageID
16
bytes
The ID of the package containing the
damaged element.
ProtocolID
2
bytes
An ID describing the protocol used to
originally receive the resource.
BlockCount
1
byte
The number of element blocks contained
in this message.
ResourceID
16
bytes
The unique ID of the resource with
missing data.
SegmentCount
2
bytes
Total number of missing segments
SegmentID
4
bytes
The ID of the missing segment
In this format, BlockCount is used to determine the total number of resource identifications present in the message. Within the block started by ResourceID, SegmentCount is used to determine how many segment identifications will be present. The exact definition of segment identification varies by protocol, but may be determined by dividing SegStartByte by the packet size for UHTTP-encoded resources. Using this format, and assuming the protocol identification for UHTTP is “1”, the message sent in the preceding example may look something like: P, 1, 1, C2, 4, 100, 101, 102, 103.
The transmission system may receive the request for repair data from the reception system, and may comprise a re-transmission system to combine this information into an aggregate repair data set it's creating for P using requests received from multiple other reception systems. Once completed, the availability of this set and a scheduled broadcast time is transmitted over the broadcast network. The reception system knows it needs data to complete the reception of P and tunes in or listens for transmission of such information. For example, it may tune its demodulator to the appropriate frequency. The reception system may then receive the transmission, extract segments 100, 101, 102, and 103 from the transmission, and complete the reception of P.
Exemplary Computer Architecture
As discussed herein, a “system” or “computer system”, such as a system for transmitting content or receiving content, may be an apparatus including hardware and/or software for processing data. The system may include, but is not limited to, a computer (e.g., portable, laptop, desktop, server, mainframe, etc.), hard copy equipment (e.g., optical disk burner, printer, plotter, fax machine, etc.), and the like.
A computer system 1200 representing an exemplary workstation, host, or server in which features of the present invention may be implemented will now be described with reference to
The computer system 1200 may also be coupled via the bus 1201 to a display device 1221, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT) or liquid crystal display (LCD), to display information to an end user. Typically, a data input device 1222, such as a keyboard or other alphanumeric input device including alphanumeric and other keys, may be coupled with the bus 1201 to communicate information and command selections to the processor 1202. Another type of user input device is a cursor control device 1223, such as a mouse, a trackball, or cursor direction keys, to communicate direction information and command selections to the processor 1202 and to control cursor movement on the display 1221.
A communication device 1225 is also coupled with the bus 1201. Depending upon the particular implementation, the communication device 1225 may include a modem, a network interface card, or other well-known interface devices, such as those used for coupling to Ethernet, token ring, or other types of physical attachment for purposes of providing a communication link to support a local or wide area network, for example. In any event, in this manner, the computer system 1200 may be coupled with a number of clients or servers via a conventional network infrastructure, such as a company's intranet, an extranet, or the Internet, for example. The communication device may be used to present content to a transmitter device, such as an antenna, or to receive content from a receiver.
Embodiments of the invention are not limited to any particular computer system. Rather, embodiments may be used on any stand alone, transmitted, networked, or other type of computer system. For example, embodiments may be used on one or more computers compatible with NT, Linux, Windows, Macintosh, any variation of Unix, or others.
The present invention includes various operations, as described above. The operations of the present invention may be performed by hardware components or may be embodied in machine-executable instructions, which may be used to cause a general-purpose or special-purpose processor or logic circuits programmed with the instructions to perform the operations. The present invention may be provided as a computer program product that may include a machine-readable medium having stored thereon instructions that may be used to program a computer (or other electronic devices) to perform a process according to the present invention. The machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magneto-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnet or optical cards, flash memory, or other type of media or machine-readable medium suitable for storing electronic instructions. Moreover, the present invention may also be downloaded as a computer program product, wherein the program may be transferred from a remote computer to a requesting computer by way of data signals embodied in a carrier wave or other propagation medium via a communication link (e.g., a modem or network connection). Alternatively, the operations may be performed by a combination of hardware and software.
In conclusion, the present invention provides a system and method for transmitting and receiving content with feedback that indicates missing content. At least some of the missing content is typically re-transmitted, received, combined with the existing incomplete content, and used to improve the presentation of the content.
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Pendakur, Ramesh, Hallford, Jason C.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10819759, | Apr 30 2015 | AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Apparatus and method for managing events in a computer supported collaborative work environment |
11477250, | Apr 30 2015 | AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Apparatus and method for managing events in a computer supported collaborative work environment |
9007978, | Dec 07 2010 | Alcatel Lucent | Method and apparatus for improved multicast service |
9794306, | Apr 30 2015 | AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Apparatus and method for providing a computer supported collaborative work environment |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4602279, | Mar 21 1984 | CALOF, LAWRENCE, AGENT FOR NOLAN K BUSHNELL | Method for providing targeted profile interactive CATV displays |
5075771, | Aug 21 1987 | Hashimoto Corporation | Method of and apparatus for optimal scheduling of television programming to maximize customer satisfaction |
5155591, | Oct 23 1989 | GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION GIC-4 | Method and apparatus for providing demographically targeted television commercials |
5303234, | Jul 15 1991 | NEC Corporation | Random access data communication system with slot assignment capability for contending users |
5410344, | Sep 22 1993 | INTELLECTUAL VENTURES VIDEO PREFERENCES 3 LLC | Apparatus and method of selecting video programs based on viewers' preferences |
5426513, | Jun 16 1989 | HARRIS CORPORATION, | Prioritized image transmission system and method |
5444499, | Jan 08 1993 | Sony Corporation | Audio video apparatus with intelligence for learning a history of user control |
5446919, | Feb 20 1990 | 24 7 REAL MEDIA, INC | Communication system and method with demographically or psychographically defined audiences |
5457808, | Feb 04 1992 | NEC Corporation | Point-to-multipoint communication network capable of retransmitting a multicast signal |
5483278, | Jun 01 1993 | U S PHILIPS CORPORATION | System and method for finding a movie of interest in a large movie database |
5534911, | Nov 02 1994 | S F IP PROPERTIES 19 LLC | Virtual personal channel in a television system |
5559549, | Dec 09 1992 | Comcast IP Holdings I, LLC | Television program delivery system |
5563895, | Oct 30 1992 | 2011 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ASSET TRUST | Digital mobil E radio communication system |
5564088, | Jan 29 1993 | Sony Corporation | Broadcast signal receiver with means for prioritizing broadcast signals based on previous selections thereof |
5585838, | May 05 1995 | Rovi Technologies Corporation | Program time guide |
5594490, | May 23 1994 | ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC | System for distributing video/audio files from central location to a plurality of cable headends |
5600364, | Dec 09 1992 | Comcast IP Holdings I, LLC | Network controller for cable television delivery systems |
5664091, | Aug 31 1995 | NCR Corporation | Method and system for a voiding unnecessary retransmissions using a selective rejection data link protocol |
5680322, | May 30 1994 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for dynamic image data transmission |
5686954, | Sep 29 1994 | Sony Corporation | Program information broadcasting method program information display method, and receiving device |
5689439, | Mar 31 1995 | THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Switched antenna diversity transmission method and system |
5724345, | Dec 13 1995 | Alcatel Lucent | System and method for a scalable and reliable transmission of electronic software distribution |
5727002, | Jan 19 1995 | HANGER SOLUTIONS, LLC | Methods for transmitting data |
5751282, | Jun 13 1995 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | System and method for calling video on demand using an electronic programming guide |
5768681, | Aug 22 1995 | GOOGLE LLC | Channel conservation for anticipated load surge in video servers |
5778182, | Nov 07 1995 | AT&T Corp. | Usage management system |
5790935, | Jan 30 1996 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Virtual on-demand digital information delivery system and method |
5801747, | Nov 15 1996 | MIH Technology Holdings BV | Method and apparatus for creating a television viewer profile |
5801753, | Aug 11 1995 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Method and apparatus for providing an interactive guide to events available on an information network |
5838668, | Jun 13 1995 | Fujitsu Limited | Satellite broadcast communications system |
5838678, | Jul 24 1996 | DIGITAL VIDEO SYSTEMS, INC | Method and device for preprocessing streams of encoded data to facilitate decoding streams back-to back |
5845090, | Feb 14 1994 | GOOGLE LLC | System for software distribution in a digital computer network |
5867799, | Apr 04 1996 | HUDSON BAY MASTER FUND LTD | Information system and method for filtering a massive flow of information entities to meet user information classification needs |
5918002, | Jan 30 1997 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Selective retransmission for efficient and reliable streaming of multimedia packets in a computer network |
5918022, | Sep 28 1998 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Protocol for transporting reservation system data over a TCP/IP network |
5920700, | Sep 06 1996 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC | System for managing the addition/deletion of media assets within a network based on usage and media asset metadata |
5928330, | Sep 06 1996 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | System, device, and method for streaming a multimedia file |
5930493, | Jun 07 1995 | GOOGLE LLC | Multimedia server system and method for communicating multimedia information |
5937411, | Nov 21 1997 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for creating storage for java archive manifest file |
5940738, | May 26 1995 | ENTRIQ INC ; IRDETO USA, INC | Video pedestal network |
5945988, | Jun 06 1996 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Method and apparatus for automatically determining and dynamically updating user preferences in an entertainment system |
5963551, | Nov 18 1996 | Innomedia PTE LTD | System and method for dynamically reconfigurable packet transmission |
5973683, | Nov 24 1997 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic regulation of television viewing content based on viewer profile and viewing history |
5977964, | Jun 06 1996 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for automatically configuring a system based on a user's monitored system interaction and preferred system access times |
5991841, | Sep 24 1997 | Intel Corporation | Memory transactions on a low pin count bus |
5999526, | Nov 26 1996 | THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Method and apparatus for delivering data from an information provider using the public switched network |
6002393, | Aug 22 1995 | HBAC MATCHMAKER MEDIA INC | System and method for delivering targeted advertisements to consumers using direct commands |
6002852, | Jul 14 1995 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Method and system for confirming receipt of data opportunistically broadcast to client computer systems |
6005597, | Oct 27 1997 | Disney Enterprises, Inc. | Method and apparatus for program selection |
6006247, | Mar 21 1995 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for scheduling threads and handling exceptions within a multiprocessor data processing system |
6018768, | Mar 08 1996 | OPENTV, INC | Enhanced video programming system and method for incorporating and displaying retrieved integrated internet information segments |
6020883, | Nov 29 1994 | Pinpoint Incorporated | System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles |
6021433, | Jan 26 1996 | SIMPLEAIR, INC | System and method for transmission of data |
6025837, | Mar 29 1996 | Rovi Technologies Corporation | Electronic program guide with hyperlinks to target resources |
6055560, | Nov 06 1996 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method to provide interactivity for a networked video server |
6085252, | Apr 23 1996 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Device, system and method for real-time multimedia streaming |
6085253, | Aug 01 1997 | Rovi Guides, Inc; TV GUIDE, INC ; UV CORP | System and method for transmitting and receiving data |
6088722, | Nov 29 1994 | Fred Herz Patents, LLC | System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles |
6108645, | Nov 26 1997 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for efficient profile matching in a large scale webcasting system |
6111896, | Jan 14 1998 | SKYSTREAM NETWORKS INC | Remultiplexer for video program bearing transport streams with program clock reference time stamp adjustment |
6114376, | Apr 30 1997 | McGill University | Methods for using macrocyclic lactone compounds as multidrug resistance reversing agents in tumor and other cells |
6119189, | Sep 24 1997 | Intel Corporation | Bus master transactions on a low pin count bus |
6125259, | May 07 1996 | OKTV, Inc. | Intelligent and user friendly channel up/down control |
6131127, | Sep 24 1997 | Intel Corporation | I/O transactions on a low pin count bus |
6141785, | Oct 06 1997 | Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute | Error control method for multiparty multimedia communications |
6144376, | Nov 15 1996 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for merging, displaying and accessing personal computer content listings via a television user interface |
6148005, | Oct 09 1997 | RPX Corporation | Layered video multicast transmission system with retransmission-based error recovery |
6160989, | Dec 09 1992 | Comcast IP Holdings I, LLC | Network controller for cable television delivery systems |
6184918, | Sep 30 1997 | HANGER SOLUTIONS, LLC | Method and apparatus for monitoring viewing of broadcast data |
6233283, | Jun 23 1998 | WSOU Investments, LLC | Layered video coding using perceptual coding criteria for error resilience in packet networks |
6279040, | Dec 06 1995 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Scalable architecture for media-on demand servers |
6289012, | Aug 03 1998 | INSTATION CORPORATION | High concurrency data download apparatus and method |
6289510, | Mar 12 1998 | Fujitsu Limited | Online program-updating system and computer-readable recording medium storing a program-updating program |
6298482, | Nov 12 1997 | OATH INC | System for two-way digital multimedia broadcast and interactive services |
6304578, | May 01 1998 | WSOU Investments, LLC | Packet routing and queuing at the headend of shared data channel |
6317881, | Nov 04 1998 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for collecting and providing viewer feedback to a broadcast |
6349321, | Apr 30 1997 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Data processing system and scheduling method |
6357028, | Mar 19 1999 | Polycom, Inc | Error correction and concealment during data transmission |
6359557, | Jan 26 1998 | AT&T Corp | Monitoring and notification method and apparatus |
6359571, | Oct 13 1998 | Hitachi, Ltd.; Xanavi Informatics Corp. | Broadcasting type information providing system and travel environment information collecting device |
6374405, | Feb 17 1999 | OpenTV, Corp. | Module scheduling with a time interval and ending time |
6378036, | Mar 12 1999 | COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC | Queuing architecture including a plurality of queues and associated method for scheduling disk access requests for video content |
6389593, | Dec 12 1995 | Sony Corporation | Method of and apparatus for controlling transmission of information on programs |
6397387, | Jun 02 1997 | Sony Corporation; Sony Electronics, Inc. | Client and server system |
6424625, | Oct 28 1998 | HIGHBRIDGE PRINCIPAL STRATEGIES, LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Method and apparatus for discarding packets in a data network having automatic repeat request |
6430608, | Feb 09 1999 | BMC SOFTWARE, INC | Method and apparatus for accepting and rejecting files according to a manifest |
6434747, | Jan 19 2000 | Individual Network, Inc. | Method and system for providing a customized media list |
6449632, | Apr 01 1999 | SYNAMEDIA LIMITED | Apparatus and method for agent-based feedback collection in a data broadcasting network |
6449654, | Aug 01 1997 | UV CORP ; TV GUIDE, INC ; Rovi Guides, Inc | System and methods for retransmitting corrupted data |
6457010, | Dec 03 1998 | PRIME RESEARCH ALLIANCE E , INC , A CORPORATION OF BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS | Client-server based subscriber characterization system |
6460036, | Nov 28 1994 | Pinpoint Incorporated | System and method for providing customized electronic newspapers and target advertisements |
6467089, | Dec 23 1997 | Nielsen Media Research, Inc. | Audience measurement system incorporating a mobile handset |
6480783, | Mar 17 2000 | Makor Issues and Rights Ltd. | Real time vehicle guidance and forecasting system under traffic jam conditions |
6490722, | Mar 30 1999 | TIVO SOLUTIONS INC | Software installation and recovery system |
6513069, | Mar 08 1996 | OPENTV, INC | Enhanced video programming system and method for providing a distributed community network |
6516192, | Jan 03 1997 | Cellport Systems, Inc. | Communications channel selection |
6526455, | Feb 05 1996 | Object management method, apparatus and data structure | |
6529526, | Jul 13 1998 | THOMSON LICENSING S A | System for processing programs and program content rating information derived from multiple broadcast sources |
6557042, | Mar 19 1999 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Multimedia summary generation employing user feedback |
6570843, | May 22 1998 | KENCAST, INC | Method for minimizing the number of data packets required for retransmission in a two-way communication system |
6571389, | Apr 27 1999 | International Business Machines Corporation; IBM Corporation | System and method for improving the manageability and usability of a Java environment |
6574518, | Nov 29 1999 | General Electric Company | Method and apparatus for communicating operational data for a system unit in a medical diagnostic system |
6577599, | Jun 30 1999 | Oracle America, Inc | Small-scale reliable multicasting |
6578199, | Nov 12 1999 | Fujitsu Limited | Automatic tracking system and method for distributable software |
6587985, | Nov 30 1998 | Panasonic Corporation | Data transmission method, data transmission apparatus, data receiving apparatus, and packet data structure |
6594682, | Oct 28 1997 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Client-side system for scheduling delivery of web content and locally managing the web content |
6601237, | Dec 23 1998 | S I SV EL SOCIETA ITALIANA PER LO SVILUPPO DELL ELETTRONICA S P A | Apparatus and method for rescheduling program conflicts in a virtual channel scheduling gap |
6617980, | Oct 13 1998 | Hitachi, Ltd.; Xanavi Informatics Corporation | Broadcasting type information providing system and travel environment information collecting device |
6643322, | Sep 20 2000 | MONUMENT BANK OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC | Dynamic wireless link adaptation |
6662330, | Apr 07 2000 | MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC | Joint range reject automatic repeat request protocol |
6678890, | Mar 10 1999 | Sony Corporation | Bidirectional transmission/reception system and method and transmission apparatus |
6792470, | Mar 02 2000 | Sovereign Peak Ventures, LLC | Method and apparatus for communicating with data frames having priority levels |
6842461, | Mar 08 2002 | MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC | Method and apparatus for data retransmission within a communication system |
6850559, | Jun 28 1999 | AT&T Corp | System and methods for transmitting data |
6970127, | Jan 14 2000 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Remote control for wireless control of system and displaying of compressed video on a display on the remote |
7058027, | Sep 16 1998 | Scientific Research Corporation | Systems and methods for asynchronous transfer mode and internet protocol |
20010012299, | |||
20010013127, | |||
20010037507, | |||
20020156912, | |||
20030004955, | |||
EP902569, | |||
EP1028551, | |||
EP1043892, | |||
EP1089201, | |||
EP1089571, | |||
WO1149, | |||
WO59204, | |||
WO64165, | |||
WO105449, | |||
WO115451, | |||
WO117195, | |||
WO172042, | |||
WO193524, | |||
WO2103940, | |||
WO2103941, | |||
WO2104030, | |||
WO2104031, | |||
WO248863, | |||
WO3028381, | |||
WO3030540, | |||
WO3061245, | |||
WO9726729, | |||
WO9944159, | |||
WO9965237, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 25 2008 | Intel Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 05 2012 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Dec 09 2015 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Feb 17 2020 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Aug 03 2020 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jun 26 2015 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Dec 26 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 26 2016 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jun 26 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jun 26 2019 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Dec 26 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 26 2020 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jun 26 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jun 26 2023 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Dec 26 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 26 2024 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jun 26 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |