A laminated wing structure includes at least one layer of metal material and at least one layer of a shape memory polymer (SMP) material. The SMP is heated to a temperature in its glass transition band tg to roll the wing around the air vehicle into a stored position. The metal layer(s) must be thin enough to remain below its yield point when rolled up. In preparation for launch, the SMP material is thermally activated allowing the strain energy stored in the layer of metal material to return the wing to its deployed position at launch. Once deployed, the SMP cools to its glassy state. The SMP material may be reinforced with fiber to form a polymer matrix composite (PMC). SMP may be used to provide shear strain relief for multiple metal layers. By offloading the motive force required to return the wing to its original deployed position from the SMP to the metal, the polymer does not acquire a permanent set and the wing may be deployed accurately.
|
14. A roll-up wing for an air vehicle, comprising:
at least one layer of a shape memory polymer (SMP) material;
a plurality of layers of metal material separated by said at least one layer of SMP material;
a thermal activation unit configured to heat the SMP material to a temperature in its glass transition band tg to roll the wing around the air vehicle to a stored position in which the layers of metal stores strain energy and to heat the SMP material to a temperature in or above its glass transition band tg allowing the strain energy stored in the layers of metal material to return the wing to a deployed position.
11. A roll-up wing for an air vehicle, comprising:
at least one layer of metal material;
at least one layer of a polymer matrix composite (PMC) including a shape memory polymer (SMP) matrix and fiber reinforcement in said matrix; and
a thermal activation unit configured to heat the SMP matrix to a temperature in its glass transition band tg to roll the wing around the air vehicle to a stored position in which the at least one layer of metal stores strain energy and to heat the SMP material to a temperature in or above its glass transition band tg allowing the strain energy stored in the at least one layer of metal material to return the wing to a deployed position.
1. A roll-up wing for an air vehicle, comprising:
at least one layer of metal material;
at least one layer of a shape memory polymer (SMP) material on said at least one layer of metal material, said SMP material characterized by a glass transition band tg above which the SMP material is in an elastomeric state and below which the material is in a glassy state;
a first means for heating the SMP material to a temperature in the glass transition band tg to roll the wing around the air vehicle to a stored position, said SMP material cooling to transition to its glassy state while in the stored position; and
second means for heating the SMP material to a temperature in or above the glass transition band tg allowing strain energy stored in the layer of metal material to return the wing to a deployed position.
16. A method of packaging, storing and deploying a roll-up wing for an air vehicle, comprising:
providing a wing in a deployed position from an air vehicle, said wing including a laminate of at least one layer of metal material and at least one layer of a shape memory polymer (SMP) material, said SMP characterized by a glass transition band tg above which the SMP material is in an elastomeric state and below which the material is in a glassy state;
heating the SMP material to a temperature in its glass transition band tg;
with the SMP material in its glass transition band, rolling the wing from the deployed position around the air vehicle into a stored position;
allowing the wing to cool whereby the SNIP material transitions to its glassy state for storage; and
heating the SMP material to a temperature in or above its glass transition band tg whereby at launch strain energy stored in the rolled up layer of metal material unrolls the wing to its deployed position.
2. The roll-up wing of
3. The roll-up wing of
4. The roll-up wing of
5. The roll-up wing of
6. The roll-up wing of
7. The roll-up wing, of
8. The roll-up wing for of
9. The roll-up wing of
10. The roll-up wing of
12. The toll-up wing of
13. The roll-up wing of
15. The roll-up wing of
17. The method of
once deployed, allowing the SMP material to cool and transition to its glassy state.
18. The method of
19. The method of
20. The method of
|
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to wings for fitment-constrained air vehicles, and more particularly to wings for tube and pylon launched missiles, projectiles and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or micro aerial vehicles (MAVs).
2. Description of the Related Art
Air vehicles such as missiles, projectiles and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or micro aerial vehicles (MAVs) are often launched from ground, air or sea based tube or pylon launch platforms. These vehicles range from a fraction of a pound for MAVs to upwards of 10,000 pounds for large cruise missiles and munitions, and fly with speeds ranging from a few miles per hour to transonic, i.e. around Mach 1. These launch platforms are “fitment” constrained in space and volume e.g. the limited volume of a tube or the limited volume inside or under an airframe. To utilize the available space and volume, these vehicles typically employ retractable wings that are stored inside the airframe and deploy at launch. As used herein a “wing” is any aerodynamic surface that provides flight control and/or lift generation including wings, fins and canards.
Retractable wings are typically formed of machined aluminum. Machined aluminum wings can withstand the heavy loads imparted by transonic flight and/or rapid maneuvering. Aluminum is easily machined to satisfy close tolerances on the “outer mold line” (OML) of the wing. A tight OML tolerance is critical to provide minimal disturbance in aerodynamic performance that could create roll/pitch moments, drag, etc. However, the wings are limited to have a ‘chord’ length “d” less than the diameter of the vehicle and a span length “l” less than the length of the air frame in order to fully retract inside the air frame for storage.
As customer demands on the performance of these types of air vehicles increases and the fitment constraints are restricted further, the limitations on chord and span lengths provide inadequate endurance (range) and control to fly desired missions. By comparison, commercial manned aircraft typically have a chord length that is 3×-4× the diameter of the airframe and a span length of 2× the length of the of the air frame to provide sufficient wing surface area to provide lift at low speeds for efficient flight and maneuverability.
The University of Florida has developed a bendable wing for MAVs (U.S. Pat. No. 7,331,546). The wing may be rolled up around the airframe and the MAV stored in a small cylindrical tube. Upon release, the wing returns to its original position for flight. MAVs are very small, lightweight vehicles that fly at relatively low speeds; hence the loading on the wings is fairly small. The wing is formed from one or more layers of resilient materials such that the wing is bendable from its original position. The resilient materials may include fiber reinforced laminates and fabrics such as carbon fiber reinforced polymers, glass reinforced polymers and aramid reinforced polymers; sheet metal such as spring steel, high strength aluminum, stainless steel and titanium; foam materials; and plastics. The wing returns to its original shape because the elastic characteristics of the wing causes the wing to remain under forces when bent from its original position. These forces abate only when the wing is returned to its original position. The materials used to form the wing have great flexibility and elasticity and bend rather than permanently yielding. Thus the MAV needs only to be removed from a storage container for the wing to return to its original shape. The wing returns to its original shape “without additional steps or use of mechanical mechanisms, such as servos, motors, piezoelectrics, or shape memory alloys.”
Polymers exhibit a glass transition temperature or band of temperatures Tg in which the transition from a glassy state below Tg to an elastomeric state above Tg. Many polymers are formulated for use exclusively in their elastomeric state. If the temperature is reduced below Tg the polymer becomes very brittle and not useful. Other polymers are formulated for use exclusively in their glassy state. If the temperature exceeds Tg, the polymers will decompose and oxidize. An important sub-class of polymers known as “Shape Memory Polymers” (SMPs) are stable (mechanically/chemically/thermally) above and below the glass transition. Virtually any polymer family can be made in an SMP formulation today. The choice as to which polymer is used will depend upon the application. In their elastomeric state the SMPs can be stretched and otherwise deformed. In their glassy state, the SMPs exhibit a high Young's Modulus (at least 10× that in the elastomeric state). The SMP can be deformed from its original shape to some desired shape while in the elastomeric state and then cooled to the glassy state to hold the desired shape. Microscopic strain energy is stored in the molecular strands that provide a small motive force. This sub-class of polymers gets their name from the fact that when the material is reheated to above Tg the SMP returns to its original or “memorized” shape. SMPs have been proposed for use as a deployment mechanism in space-based systems for antennas or solar arrays. In space, the “loads” are minimal because of the lack of atmosphere and gravity. Consequently the motive force of the “memory effect” albeit quite small may be sufficient to deploy certain systems. SMPs have also been proposed for use as a “skin” for reconfigurable wings in aircraft. The skin would be heated to above Tg, the wing reconfigured via actuators and a support structure and then the skin cooled to below Tg to provide a stiff skin. In this case, the motive force of the shape memory effect is negligible.
The following is a summary of the invention in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the invention. This summary is not intended to identify key or critical elements of the invention or to delineate the scope of the invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of the invention in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description and the defining claims that are presented later.
The present invention provides a roll-up wing for fitment constrained air vehicles.
This is accomplished with a laminated wing structure including at least one layer of metal material and at least one layer of a shape memory polymer (SMP) material. Each metal layer must be thin enough to remain below its yield point when rolled up. The SMP material is characterized by a glass transition band Tg above which the SMP material is in an elastomeric state and below which the material is in a glassy state. A first means is provided for heating the SMP material to a temperature in the glass transition band Tg to roll the wing around the air vehicle into a stored position. The SMP material cools to its glassy state for storage. By “packing” the SMP material while in its transition band minimal strain energy is stored in the material. As a result, the SMP material will not acquire a permanent set within the storage life of the vehicle and the wing may be accurately returned to the original deployed position. However, to avoid permanent set the SMP material will not store sufficient strain energy to return the wing to its deployed position. A second means heats the SMP material to a temperature in or above the glass transition band Tg softening the SMP, allowing the strain energy stored in the layer(s) of metal material to return the wing to its deployed position at launch. Once deployed, the SMP will typically cool and transition to its glassy state. The SMP material may be reinforced with fiber to form a polymer matrix composite (PMC). SMP may be used to provide shear strain relief for multiple metal layers.
These and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, taken together with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention describes a roll-up wing for fitment-constrained air vehicles, and more particularly to wings for tube and pylon launched missiles, projectiles and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or micro aerial vehicles (MAVs). The roll-up wing preferably occupies minimal storage volume while providing greater surface area (longer chord length or greater span) than would be achievable with conventional retractable wings. To be effective, the roll-up wing must accurately return to its original deployed position without additional mechanical actuation and be stiff enough to carry flight loads over the design envelope of the wing and air vehicle. Due to their mass, velocity and precision maneuvers, the flight loads associated with projectiles and certain missiles far exceeds those experienced by typical MAVs. These vehicles may reach transonic speeds (approximately Mach 0.8 to 1.2).
We considered both the “bendable wing” and a SMP wing structure as possible solutions but found both to be lacking for different reasons. Although conceptually attractive, the motive force provided by a SMP wing structure is simply too small to deploy a wing under normal flight loads (e.g. the gravitation and atmospheric loads are too large). In the ‘bendable wing’, if the resilient material is one or more metal layers if the metal is thick enough to carry the flight loads (except for the smallest MAVs) the metal will yield when rolled up around the air vehicle. If the resilient material is a polymer of the types taught in U.S. Pat. No. 7,331,546, when the layer is rolled up considerable macroscopic strain energy will be stored in the layer. This strain energy is required to return the wing to its original position. Unfortunately, the storage of such strain energy for even short periods of time e.g. a few days causes the polymer to acquire a “permanent set”. Consequently, when the wings are released they do not accurately return to the original position.
We then considered a simple laminate of metal and polymer layers. The metal layer may provide sufficient stored strain energy to return the wing to its original deployed position. The polymer layer reinforces the metal layer to carry flight loads. Unfortunately, this approach is still not effective. The polymer layer will acquire a permanent set, preventing the wing from being accurately returned to its original deployed position. If a polymer is to be used to reinforce the metal layer, a configuration and methodology in which the polymer does not acquire a permanent set during the storage life of the aerial vehicle is necessary.
The solution is accomplished with a laminated wing structure including at least one layer of metal material and at least one layer of a shape memory polymer (SMP) material. The metal layer(s) must each be thin enough to remain below the yield point when rolled up. The metal layer may be formed to have a curved surface in a deployed position to increase stiffness. The SMP material is characterized by a glass transition band Tg above which the SMP material is in an elastomeric state and below which the material is in a glassy state. A first means is provided for heating the SMP material to a temperature in the glass transition band Tg to roll the wing around the air vehicle into a stored position. The SMP material cools to its glassy state for storage. By “packing” the SMP material while in its transition band minimal strain energy is stored in the material. The stored energy is attributable only to the microscopic energy stored in the molecular strands. Macroscopic strain energy that would be stored if the SNAP were packed in either its glassy or elastomeric states is not present. As a result, the SMP material will not acquire a permanent set within the storage life of the vehicle and the wing may be accurately returned to the original deployed position. However, to avoid permanent set the SMP material will not have sufficient strain energy to return the wing to its deployed position under expected flight loads. In preparation for launch, a second means heats the SMP material to a temperature in or above the glass transition band Tg softening the SMP and allowing the strain energy stored in the layer(s) of metal material to return the wing to its deployed position at launch. The SMP's memorized state suitably corresponds to the wing's deployed position so that the SNIP does not resist deployment. Once deployed, the SMP material will typically cool and transition to its glassy state. The laminated wing is stiff enough to carry flight loads. The SMP material may be reinforced with fiber to form a polymer matrix composite (PMC) layer. The SMP may be used to provide shear strain relief for multiple metal layers. By offloading the motive force required to return the wing to its original deployed position from the SMP to the metal, the SMP does not acquire a permanent set and the wing may be deployed accurately.
An embodiment of a roll-up wing 10 is illustrated in
Wing 10 can be described by its length (“semi-span”) measured from the “root” where the wing attaches to the air vehicle to the tip, width (“chord length’) measured at the root from the leading edge to the trailing edge and cross-section as well as its taper, twist and camber. “Taper” indicates the rate of change of the chord length along the half-span of the wing from the root where the wing attaches to the airframe to the tip of the wing. Wings are tapered to control the distribution of lift along the wing span. “Twist” indicates the rotation of the cross-section along an axis through the half-span of the wing. Twist is provided to avoid stalling the aircraft along the entire span of the wing, allowing the pilot or control system time to recover. “Camber” is the asymmetry between the top and the bottom curves of the wing in cross-section. Camber affects the lift and pitching moment of the wing. Camber may vary from wing root to wing tip. The laminate of metal and SMP exhibits a stiffness of at least a specified minimum stiffness for the air vehicle and designed for flight conditions. Finally, roll-up wing 10 must accurately return to its original deployed position without additional mechanical actuation.
In the laminate, the number of metal layers 12 and layer thickness may be determined by a combination of the specified minimum stiffness for the wing, diameter of the air vehicle (i.e. required radius of curvature), and metal properties, i.e. yield strength. The metal may be selected from steel, stainless steel, titanium, nickel, aluminum or other suitable metals. The thickness of the individual layers of metal is less than the “yield point” for the radius of curvature. Simply stacking metal layers to increase stiffness poses the same problem as using a single thicker metal layer; thick metal will not roll without yielding. As will be described below, this problem can be overcome by using the SMP between metal layers to provide sheer strain relief. The metal layer or layers may be flat or curved. Curvature increases the bending stiffness of the layer. Different layers may have the same curvature (e.g. both downward) or opposite (e.g. downward and upward) and may have the same or different radius of curvature. The total thickness of the one or more layers is enough to store sufficient strain energy when rolled to unroll and deploy the wing.
In the laminate, the number of SMP layers 14 and layer thickness may be determined by a combination of aerodynamic requirements and available wing storage space. We assume the SMP layer can tolerate whatever bending strains occur, because polymers are naturally able to withstand much larger strains than metals (at least an order of magnitude more). The SMP layer(s) is suitably manufactured so that the original or “memorized” shape is that of the deployed wing. Consequently, when the SMP is in its transition band or elastomeric state it tends to relax to the deployed position.
Virtually any polymer family can be made in an SMP formulation today. SMPs are stable (mechanically/chemically/thermally) above and below the glass transition. In its glassy state, the SMP is stiff but not brittle. In its elastomeric state, the SMP is rubbery or malleable but does not lose its physical integrity. Young's Modulus quantifies the elasticity of the polymer. It is defined, for small strains, as the ratio of rate of change of stress to strain. A polymer's Young's Modulus in its glassy state is typically at least 2-3 orders of magnitude greater than in its elastomeric state e.g., the polymer is much stiffer or rigid.
Several known polymer types exhibit shape memory properties including but not limited to epoxy, styrene, polyurethane, bismolyimide and cyanate ester. SMP may or may not be cross-linked. One of the best known and best researched polymer types to date, that exhibits shape memory polymer properties is polyurethane polymers. Gordon, Proc of First Intl. Conf. Shape Memory and Superelastic Tech., 115-120 (1994) and Tobushi et al., Proc of First Intl. Conf. Shape Memory and Superelastic Tech., 109-114 (1994) exemplify studies directed to properties and application of shape memory polyurethanes. Another polymeric system based on crosslinking polyethylene homopolymer was reported by S. Ota, Radial. Phys. Chem. 18, 81 (1981). A styrene-butadiene thermoplastic copolymer system was also described by Japan Kokai, JP 63-179955 to exhibit shape memory properties. Polyisoprene was also claimed to exhibit shape memory properties in Japan Kokai JP 62-192440. Another known polymeric system, disclosed by Kagami et al., Macromol. Rapid Communication, 17, 539-543 (1996), is the class of copolymers of stearyl acrylate and acrylic acid or methyl acrylate. Other SMP polymers known in the art includes articles formed of norbornene or dimethaneoctahydronapthalene homopolymers or copolymers, set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 4,831,094. Additionally, styrene copolymer based SMPs are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,759,481 which is incorporated herein by reference.
At typical operating or environmental temperatures, the SMP is in its glassy state. Heat must be applied to thermally activate the SMP to enter its transition band or elastomeric state. For packaging, it is important that the SMP is in its transition band to minimize the strain energy that is stored when the wing is rolled around the fuselage of the aerial vehicle. For deployment, the SMP may be activated in either its transition band or elastomeric state. As shown in
An embodiment of a complete sequence of “packaging”, “storing” and “deploying” a roll-up wing 30 on an aerial vehicle 32 is depicted in
As shown in
As shown in
Once activated, the wing is “packaged” by rolling it up around the fuselage of the aerial vehicle as shown in
The aerial vehicle and packaged wing are then prepared for storage in a launch tube 40. As the storage life of these vehicles may be several years (e.g. 5-10 years or more), once packaged thermal activation is removed and the SMP cools and transitions to its glassy state. Some type of holding mechanism 42 such as a band around the wing or clips holding the tips of the wing may be used to hold the wings tightly around the fuselage. This may be done to keep the wings from rubbing on the inside of launch tube 40 as shown in
As shown in
Just prior to or possibly at launch, the SMP is thermally activated, either in transition band Tg or in the elastomeric state, to soften the SMP as shown in
The design of a particular laminate wing will depend on many factors including but not limited to the size and weight of the air vehicle, the size and shape of the wing, the deployment and terminal velocities, maneuverability, cost etc. The principle of using a laminate of metal and SMP materials and thermally activating the SMP to both “package” and accurately “deploy” the wing may be implemented in many different ways. Without toss of generality, a few exemplary cases will now be described. As shown in
The wing stiffness may be increased dramatically with a PMC layer including a SMP matrix reinforced with fibers. The fibers may, for example, be carbon or glass fibers and may be long strands or short fiber segments. PMC using conventional polymer matrices reinforced with fibers are well known. Fiber reinforcement lay-ups are commercially available. The process for introducing the fiber reinforcement lay-up into the SMP matrix would be the same, or at least very similar, to that used with standard polymer matrix composites.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
While several illustrative embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, numerous variations and alternate embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. Such variations and alternate embodiments are contemplated, and can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Sanderson, Terry M., Sar, David R., McCreery, Thomas P., Gowler, Brian J.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
9879959, | Oct 18 2013 | Raytheon Company | Shape memory alloy micro-aero control surfaces |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4485991, | Jul 01 1983 | Rollable airfoil | |
5114104, | Oct 01 1990 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | Articulated control surface |
5927643, | Nov 05 1997 | Aerojet-General Corporation | Self-deploying airfoil for missile or the like |
5934609, | Apr 01 1997 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | Deformable propeller blade and shroud |
6182929, | Sep 25 1997 | DaimlerChrysler AG | Load carrying structure having variable flexibility |
6872433, | Mar 27 2001 | Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC | Shape memory alloy/shape memory polymer tools |
7306187, | May 17 2005 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Inflatable endurance unmanned aerial vehicle |
7331546, | Dec 09 2002 | UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC | Bendable wing for micro air vehicle |
7550189, | Aug 13 2004 | HRL Laboratories, LLC | Variable stiffness structure |
7728267, | Feb 02 2007 | Raytheon Company | Methods and apparatus for adjustable surfaces |
7777165, | Feb 02 2007 | Raytheon Company | Methods and apparatus for adjustable surfaces |
7798443, | Dec 18 2006 | The Boeing Company | Composite material for geometric morphing wing |
7887734, | Mar 14 2009 | Raytheon Company | Method of manufacture of one-piece composite parts with a polymer form that transitions between its glassy and elastomeric states |
7892630, | Aug 13 2004 | HRL Laboratories, LLC | Variable stiffness structure |
7901524, | Feb 04 2005 | HRL Laboratories, LLC | Actuation concepts for variable stiffness materials |
7938923, | Jun 04 2004 | Spintech, LLC | Method of making and using shape memory polymer composite patches |
8007705, | Mar 14 2009 | Raytheon Company | Method of manufacture of one-piece composite parts using a two-piece form including a shaped polymer that does not draw with a rigid insert designed to draw |
8092188, | Jan 09 2008 | Rosati Fratelli S.r.l. | Variable geometry fan and method for manufacturing the blades thereof |
8201773, | Jul 02 2008 | The United States of America as represented by Secretary of the Navy | Flexible self-erecting substructures for sensor networks |
20020142119, | |||
20040245393, | |||
20060284005, | |||
20080314510, | |||
20090072094, | |||
20090175726, | |||
20090206192, | |||
20090235494, | |||
20100230850, | |||
20100230859, | |||
20110001018, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Apr 27 2009 | SANDERSON, TERRY M | Raytheon Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022661 | /0558 | |
Apr 27 2009 | MCCREERY, THOMAS P | Raytheon Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022661 | /0558 | |
Apr 27 2009 | GOWLER, BRIAN J | Raytheon Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022661 | /0558 | |
Apr 28 2009 | SAR, DAVID R | Raytheon Company | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022661 | /0558 | |
May 10 2009 | Raytheon Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 24 2013 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Feb 23 2017 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Feb 24 2021 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 10 2016 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 10 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 10 2017 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 10 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 10 2020 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 10 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 10 2021 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 10 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 10 2024 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 10 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 10 2025 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 10 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |